DOCSLIB.ORG

Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment Jackson Harvest Farms Aggregate Extraction Site 1 (AiHd-171), Site 2 and Review of Recommendations for Site 3 (AiHd-172) 1894 Witmer Road, Township of Wilmot Regional Municipality of Waterloo Lot 10, German Block South of Bleams Road Geographic Township of Wilmot Waterloo County, Ontario Submitted to Jackson Harvest Farms c/o Rick Esbaugh 2819 Herrgott Road St. Clements, Ontario N0B 2M0 and The Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Prepared by @ the Museum of Ontario Archaeology 1600 Attawandaron Road, London, ON N6G 3M6 Phone: (519) 641-7222 Fax: (519) 641-7220 Archaeological License: James Taylor Sherratt, M.A., P074 Our File: 2018-158 PIF Numbers: P074-0017-2018 (Site 1 AiHd-171), P074-0018-2018 (Site 3 AiHd-172), P074-0049-2019 (Site 2) September 2019 Original Report submitted to Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 13 September 2019 TMHC Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment, Jackson Harvest Farms Site 1 (AiHd-171), Site 2 and Site 3 (AiHd-172), Wilmot Twp., Waterloo County, ON ii ____________________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary In the fall of 2018, Timmins Martelle Heritage Consultants Inc. (TMHC) was contracted by Jackson Harvest Farms to complete a Stage 3 archaeological assessment of the two Indigenous archaeological sites (Site 1 AiHd-171) and Site 2 within a proposed new aggregate pit and found during the Stage 1 and 2 assessment of the subject property completed by Archaeological Research Associates (ARA) Ltd. earlier the same year. In addition, TMHC was asked to review the Stage 3 recommendations for Site 3 (AiHd- 172), a 19thcentury archaeological site associated with an extant farm lot on the property. The Stage 3 assessment was carried out in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act R.S.O. 1990 and to meet the provisions of the Aggregate Resources Act R.S.O. 1990 as required by Policy No. 2.01.08 of the Aggregate Resources Policies and Procedures Manual (MNRF 2015). Stage 3 assessment for Site 1 (AiHd-171) consisted of a controlled surface pick- up (CSP) and the excavation of 27 1 m2 test units over an area approximately 25 m2. A total of 39 artifacts were recovered of which 15 are Indigenous. Two potential cultural features were also identified. The Indigenous component of Site 1 dates to the Woodland Period and has further Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI). The historic component of Site 1 is interpreted to be associated with Site 3 which dates to the late-19th to 20th century domestic site. It does not have further CHVI under the provincial framework. The Stage 3 assessment of Site 2 consisted of a CSP and the excavation of nine 1 m2 units over an area approximately 10 m2. A total of two Indigenous artifacts were recovered. Site 2 is an isolated Indigenous find spot for which a more specific cultural or temporal affiliation cannot be assigned. It has no further CHVI under the provincial framework. Site 1 (AiHd-171) contained both a 19th century and Indigenous component. The 19th century component has no further CHVI and no further work is recommended. The Indigenous component of Site 1 (AiHd-171) meets provincial criteria for Stage 4 assessment based on the recovery of Indigenous ceramics and identification of a possible culture feature. Two options are available: 1) long-term protection and avoidance; and 2) excavation. Avoidance and long-term protection is always the preferred mitigation strategy. In this case, the proponent has indicated that the site falls within the extraction area for the proposed aggregate pit and cannot be avoided. As such, excavation is the only viable mitigation strategy. The Stage 4 excavation strategy for Site 1 (AiHd-171) was developed in consultation with the participating Indigenous communities. The recommended Stage 4 excavation strategy entails: ______________________________________________________________________________________ TMHC Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment, Jackson Harvest Farms Site 1 (AiHd-171), Site 2 and Site 3 (AiHd-172), Wilmot Twp., Waterloo County, ON iii ____________________________________________________________________________________ • a small block excavation shall be undertaken around the two units (300N 495E:1 and 300N 495E:3) containing possible features, using standards established in Section 4.2.2 for hand excavation (MTC 2011:76). Unit excavation must continue until the per-unit count is less than 10, with fewer than two formal tools, diagnostic artifacts, burnt artifacts, and fire-cracked rock (Section 4.3 Standard 1 Table 4.1). If subsurface features are identified the excavation should be extended 2 m beyond the edge of the feature; features must be cleaned, mapped, photo- documented and excavated according to Section 4.2.2. Standard 7. • following block excavation, mechanical topsoil stripping should be undertaken for the portion of the site containing cultural features. This should follow Section 4.2.3 of the Standards and Guidelines (MTC 2011:78-79) and involve the use of an excavator with a flat-edged ditching bucket to expose the ploughzone/subsoil interface. Stripping should extend a minimum of 10 m beyond any confirmed cultural feature. The subsoil surface should be shovel shined to assist in the identification of cultural features. Any identified cultural features should be documented and excavated following Section 4.2.2., Standard 7 (MTC 2011:77). Jackson Harvest Farms Site 2 is a small, low-yielding Indigenous site for which a more specific age or cultural affiliation can be attributed due to a lack of diagnostic artifacts. As the Stage 3 per-unit excavations did not identify any units containing 10 or more artifacts, diagnostic artifacts, Indigenous ceramic sherds, or cultural features (MTC 2011:58, Section 3.4.1.1), Site 2 does not have further CHVI under the provincial framework. Therefore, the site does not meet provincial criteria for Stage 4 mitigation and no further assessment is recommended. Jackson Harvest Farms Site 3 (AiHd-172) was subject to additional background research to contextualize the site and identify its occupants. After further background research and a re-evaluation of the overall date for the artifact collection using an assemblage-based approach in keeping with The Archaeology of Rural Historical Farmsteads Bulletin (MTCS 2014), Site 3 (AiHd-172) is determined to be a ca. 1855 or 1862-1900 domestic site related to the occupation of the property largely by the Wilhelm family. Given the above and the fact that less than 80% of the site occupation pre-dates 1870, AiHd-172 has no further CHVI within the provincial framework. As such, the site does not meet provincial standards for further Stage 3 assessment and no additional work is recommended. These recommendations are subject to the conditions laid out in Section 5.0 of this report and to Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport review and acceptance of this report into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports. ______________________________________________________________________________________ TMHC Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment, Jackson Harvest Farms Site 1 (AiHd-171), Site 2 and Site 3 (AiHd-172), Wilmot Twp., Waterloo County, ON iv ____________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. iv Project Personnel…………………………………………………………………….. vii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... vii List of Images ....................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. List of Maps ....................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... v Indigenous Territorial Acknowledgements ................................................................. viii 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Development Context ........................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Purpose and Legislative Context .................................................................. 1 1.2 Archaeological Context ........................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Site Areas: Overview and Physical Setting ................................................... 2 1.2.2 Summary of Registered or Known Archaeological Sites .............................. 3 1.2.3 Summary of Past Archaeological Investigations within 50 Metres .............. 4 1.2.4 Dates of Archaeological Fieldwork .............................................................. 6 1.3 Historical Context ................................................................................................ 7 1.3.1 Indigenous Settlement in Waterloo County ................................................... 7 1.3.2 19th Century and Municipal Settlement......................................................... 7 2.0 SITE 3 (AiHd-172)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 27 October 2020
    University of Waterloo BOARD OF GOVERNORS Tuesday 27 October 2020 Meeting 1:30 p.m. Teams Videoconference Please convey regrets to Emily Schroeder at [email protected]. Time MEETING Page Action OPEN SESSION 1:30 1. Conflict of Interest Oral Declaration 2. Remarks from the Chair Oral Information 3. Agenda/Additional Agenda Items Oral Input 1:35 Consent Agenda Motion: To approve or receive for information by consent items 4-8 below. 4. Minutes of the 2 June 2020 Meeting 4 Decision 5. Report of the President a. Promotion to Professor 11 Information b. Sabbatical and Administrative Leaves/Administrative 12 Decision/Information Appointments c. Recognition and Commendation 20 Information 6. Report of the Vice-President, Administration & Finance a. Incidental Fee Changes 29 Decision/Information 7. Reports from Committees a. Building & Properties 30 Information b. Executive 33 Information c. Finance & Investment 34 Information d. Governance 37 Information e. Pension & Benefits 38 Information 8. Report of the Vice-President, Academic & Provost a. Undergraduate/Graduate Admissions Update 39 Information Regular Agenda 1:40 9. Business Arising from the Minutes Input 1:45 10. Report of the Waterloo Undergraduate Student Association 42 Information 1 of 208 Board of Governors 27 October 2020 page 2 Time OPEN SESSION Page Action 1:55 11. Divestment and Carbon-Neutral Investment Discussion 44 Discussion a. James Schlegel, Chair, Finance & Investment Committee b. Olaf Weber, Representative of Faculty and Staff Signatories to Call for Divestment Letter; Truzaar Dordi, Representative of Students, and Fossil Free UW c. Discussion 2:10 12. Report of the President1 a. Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Accountability Update Oral Information b.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo Wellington Local Health Integration Network Rural Health Care Review Final Report January 19, 2010
    Waterloo Wellington Local Health Integration Network Rural Health Care Review Final Report January 19, 2010 Prepared by the Rural Health Working Group Waterloo Wellington LHIN Rural Health Care Review January 19, 2010 Table of Contents Section Page # Executive Summary 4 - 5 1.0 Introduction 6 -11 1.1 Rural Health Working Group 1.2 Overview and Context 1.3 Format of this Report 2.0 Proposed Framework for Rural Health Services in the WWLHIN 12 - 25 2.1 Vision for Rural Health Services 2.2 Proposed Framework for Enhanced and Integrated Rural Health Services 3.0 Demographic and Health Status Profile of Rural Areas in the WWLHIN 26-41 3.1 Defining ‘Rural’ and Measuring Rurality 3.2 Demographic and Socio-economic Indicators 3.3 Health Status Indicators 4.0 Rural Community Health Needs 42-50 4.1 Community Consultation Highlights 4.2 Local Rural Health Reports 5.0 Availability and Utilization of Health Services 51-69 5.1 Hospital Utilization 5.2 CCAC Utilization 5.3 Primary Care Services 5.4 Mental Health Services 5.5 Long-term Care and Community Support Services 6.0 Applying the Framework to Rural Communities in the WWLHIN 69-77 6.1 Future Scenarios 6.2 Current vs. Future Service Configuration 6.3 Recommendations for the WWLHIN References 78-82 Page 2 Waterloo Wellington LHIN Rural Health Care Review January 19, 2010 Appendices (Separate Document) Appendix A - Rural Health Working Group Mandate, Objectives and Membership Apppendix B – The Rural Health Challenge B.1 National/international Research B.2 Provincial Rural Health Reports B.3 Rural
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act E-Register, Which Is Accessible Through the Website of the Ontario Heritage Trust At
    This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act e-Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre électronique. tenu aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. ' ' The Corporation Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee P.O. Box 669, of the City Cambridge, Ontario N1 R 5W8 of Cambridge Telephone: (519) 623-1340 ___:----- FEB 9122) February 3, 1989 AC-65 Ontario Heritage Foundation Ministry of Culture and Communications • 2nd Floor • 77 Bloor Street W. Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Attention: Nancy Smith Dear Ms. Smith: The City of Cambridge recently enacted by-laws for the following properties under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. R.S.O., 1980. Property By-law i • 1. 71 Bruce Street 25-89 2. 63 Grand Avenue N. 275-88 3. 58-76 St. Andrews St. 12-89 A copy of each by-law is enclosed. Should you have any further questions, please call me at (519) 740-4580. Yours truly, • • • Valerie Spring, VS/pd LACAC Co-ordinator. Encl. ' Cambridge City Council benefits from the Advice and Guidance it receives from Advisory Committees and Boards ------,-.------,-_ ----,,_,---_,,.------~--~---- ' ,-~--- - -" - - ,;, - ' ~- C" • BY-LAW NO. 25-89 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Being a by-law of the City of Cambridge to designate the exterior of 71 BRUCE STREET, Cambridge, Ontario as a property of architectural significance. WHEREAS the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O., 1980, c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
    NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Draft Notes (356.5Kb)
    Surrender No. 40: draft 15 A Lecture/Performance Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Fine Arts (Special Case) in Theatre University of Regina By Kenneth Clayton Wilson 26 April 2017 © 2017: K.C. Wilson Acknowledgements Many people generously gave me advice and encouragement and assistance during the Muscle and Bone and Surrender No. 40 performances. I want to acknowledge their contributions here. In particular, I am grateful to Dr. Jesse Rae Archibald-Barber; Dr. Mary Blackstone; Professor Kathryn Bracht; Dr. Daniel Coleman; Dr. Edward Doolittle; Professor David Garneau; Norma General; Richard Goetze; Liz Goetze; Professor William Hales; Professor Kelly Handerek; Tom Hill; Dr. Andrew Houston; Dr. Kathleen Irwin; Naomi Johnson; Amos Key, Jr.; Rob Knox; Janice Longboat; Dr. Dawn Martin- Hill; Dr. Sophie McCall; Janis Monture; Professor Wes D. Pearce; Wendy Philpott; Jessica Powless; Dr. Brian Rice; Dr. Kathryn Ricketts; Dr. Dylan Robinson; Wanda Schmöckel; Michael Scholar, Jr.; Noel Starblanket; Ara Steininger; Dr. Michael Trussler; Bonnie Whitlow; Marilyn Wilson; Pamela Wilson McCormick; Maggie Wilson-Wong; Calvin Wong-Birss; and Dr. Tom Woodcock. I couldn’t have completed these performances without their help. Many others also helped out, and I am thankful for their assistance as well. The Department of English and the Lifelong Learning Centre, both at the University of Regina, and Dr. Kathryn Ricketts gave me opportunities to read the text before an audience, for which I am grateful. And, of course, I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to Dr. Christine Ramsay for her continuing love, support, and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • MHBC CV Document
    CURRICULUMVITAE Ian F. MacNaughton, MA, FCIP, RPP EDUCATION Ian MacNaughton has practiced planning and resource management since 1968, and founded MHBC in 1973. He was inducted as a Fellow of the Canadian Institute 1971 of Planners in 1998. Mr. MacNaughton’s experience covers a broad range of Masters of Arts, Regional Planning interests including facilitation / mediation, resource management, local and Resource Development government reform, economic strategies, commercial planning and University of Waterloo development, downtown revitalization, housing studies, waste management, expropriation, and land development of all types and scales. He has advised 1968 senior levels of government, local municipalities, and the private sector on issues Honours Bachelor of Arts relating to planning and resource management. He has served as a member of Urban and Regional Planning the Provincial Smart Growth Central Ontario Strategy Sub-Panel and alternate on University of Waterloo the Greenbelt Task Force. Mr. MacNaughton also specializes in aggregate planning and resource management, and has been qualified as an expert witness on future trends in the aggregate resource field. He has been involved in numerous hearings before the Ontario Municipal Board and other tribunals relating to aggregate issues. Mr. MacNaughton is experienced in the management of complex multi- disciplinary and municipal projects, as illustrated by his extensive project experience, and by his appointment as Chairman of the 1995 Mayor’s Task Force on Downtown Revitalization in Kitchener. Mr. MacNaughton also provides specializes services relating to local government reform including amalgamations, boundary adjustments, county restructuring, and service reorganization. He has participated in restructuring processes in Oxford County, Essex County, Sarnia-Lambton, and Perth County.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Imagining Niagara: a Spatial Study of Economic Development (1783-1812)
    Re-imagining Niagara: A Spatial Study of Economic Development (1783-1812) by Jessica Linzel, B.A. Department of History Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Humanities, Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © 2020 Abstract The end of the American Revolution marked a turning point in the history of Niagara. In the span of three decades, this Upper Canadian district evolved as the territory of nomadic groups of Mississauga and Haudenosaunee nations into the post-war settlement of approximately 15,000 white, black, and British-allied Indigenous nations. Some arrived immediately as refugees of the late war, while other families came later in hopes of securing a brighter future. Historians generally discuss this period of Niagara’s history in terms of its socio-political developments, while economic histories of the “Loyalist Era” are most often assigned a broader lens focusing on trade and commerce in Upper Canada. To fill this historiographical gap, this paper investigates the economic developments within the Niagara region from 1783-1812, using geographic information systems (GIS) to analyze the role of geography alongside human agency in commodity production and the formation of local trade networks. This thesis includes an interactive webmap used to analyze a carefully compiled geospatial database of commodity sales gathered from primary sources. Historical GIS sets this project apart from others by bringing the investigations back to the land, showing how farmers and merchants responded to natural barriers like distance, wetlands, elevation and soil type, inciting individuals to adapt according to their personal circumstances. Ultimately, this project illustrates Niagara’s post-war transition from its role as a transshipment point in a larger transatlantic trade system into a productive agrarian economy by the early 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo South Renewal
    Waterloo South Renewal Waterloo South Population and Demographic Study Final Report March 2020 1 Waterloo South Renewal Table of contents 1. Executive summary ....................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Waterloo Estate ............................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Waterloo South ................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Renewal Vision ................................................................................................................ 14 2.5 Purpose of this report ...................................................................................................... 16 2.6 Waterloo South planning proposal ................................................................................. 17 3. Baseline analysis - Strategic context for the Waterloo Precinct ................................. 20 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Strategic context .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waterloo South Social Sustainability Report
    Waterloo South Social Sustainability Report Client: Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) Date: 04 September 2020 Contact: Steve Rossiter [email protected] 02 9387 2600 SYDNEY 02 9387 2600 Level 6, 332 - 342 Oxford Street Bondi Junction NSW 2022 www.elton.com.au [email protected] Sydney | Brisbane | Canberra | Darwin | Melbourne | Perth ABN 56 003 853 101 Prepared by Sophie Le Mauff, Alexander Iping, Jessica Noyes, Sarah Jones and Nash Condran Reviewed by Steve Rossiter and Lucy Greig Date 04 September 2020 Version FINAL draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 14 1.1 Overview 14 1.2 Waterloo Estate 14 1.3 Waterloo South 15 1.4 Redevelopment Vision 17 1.5 Purpose of this report 18 1.6 Study approach and methodology 18 1.7 Report structure 20 2 EXISTING AND FUTURE WATERLOO 21 2.1 Existing context and community profile 21 2.2 Future Waterloo 27 3 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 35 3.1 NSW Government plans and policies 35 3.2 City of Sydney plans and policies 38 3.3 A framework for social sustainability in Waterloo 40 3.4 Social sustainability issues and opportunities 42 4 PLACE DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 43 4.1 Housing 43 4.2 Access and connectivity 46 4.3 Public domain 47 4.4 Community infrastructure 52 4.5 Summary of place findings and recommendations 66 5 PEOPLE DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 69 5.1 Social mix and integration 69 5.2 Community identity and connections 71 5.3 Affordability 72 5.4 Services and support systems 73 5.5 Employment and training
    [Show full text]
  • Brantford Asks Confederacy to Meet
    , LIBRARY ARCHIVES CANADA rchs Canada 1`.1c, oRINA,I,S IIIfflIi/»hI IIIIIII III IIII isi1III I II5002 to. t i r,ia 5002 7 Ìffee ......m Canada Archives 1 Library and Turtle Is anaß Collection North America's #1 Native Weekly Newspapi Newspaper Wellington ON 4 $1.39 395 K 1 A Okarahshona kenh Onkwehonwene, Six Nations of the Grant Ottawa, ON Reg No 10963-- ...viar2li:i. 4O01630y WEDNESDAY, ONERAHTOKKO:WA/MAY 11, 2011 WWW. theturtleislandnews.CUll_Pub'No ç Inside: -Brantford asks Confederacy to meet 2 r Moms get a on development PAGE treat ... PAGE 5 ri INAC red tape stops lit r education superintende hiring ... PAGE 4 e.-"_ r r. i SPORTS: Team Ontario takes . bronze ` K o . ... PAGE 9 Jr - t. r ford î tit ayor D...*CONTENTS Chris r . ` Local 2 Editorial 6 y with Onondaga Sports 8 I íthief Pete Skye Careers 18 Notices 19 OMá Classified 22 Business Directory 23 Saturday (Photo Price $1.25 I\ o by Lynn! ówless) (plus taxes where applicable) !R 01. , I .-r' r, J. --...legislU1t'ofti t)4J?:oj1o a 74470 04551 9 Ciou'd Çost $i( t4 ids ,iPAGE 2.. "° , ' - . 24 HOUR SURVEILLANCE WARNING take" you're not? vjateiniv3v,l Serving our community, t .. s ..-- a " I with over 30 Years Experience! ' t 4 Brad & Lorrie Hootun I Th BUSINESS HOME INDUSTRIAL Security System Services Systems 24 RI 1 C Burglar Alarms C Camera c Hour Monitoring NIiI11 11NI> c & more L t , : C Access Control C Fire & Sprinkler Monitoring 519.751.2255 www.owl-tech.ca 1.866.684.2226 x .
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14
    Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14 14 Stage 5: Recommend a Preferred Solution 15 •Rehabilitate Aurora Well No. 5, Aurora Well No. 6 and Newmarket Well No. 15 •Construct new wells at: • Green Lane • Aurora Well No. 5 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution – Green Lane 16 Green Lane Well Construction: • Aquifer Thickness – 31 m • Transmitting Capacity – 104 L/s • Available Drawdown – 33 m • Completion Date – July 27th, 2016 • Diameter – 0.30 m (12”) • Step Test – July 28, 2016 • Depth – 93 m • 72 hour Test - August 2-5, 2016 • Screen Length – 10.7 m Parameter Step-Test 72 Hour Test Pumping Rate 18/36/55 55 (L/s) Drawdown (m) 0.14/0.37/0.77 3.8 Specific Capacity 71 (at 55 L/s) 15 (L/s/m) Water Quality Hardness and iron Hardness and iron Results above ODWQS above ODWQS 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution - Green Lane 17 Monitoring Wells 17 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution - Aurora 18 Aurora Well Construction: • Aquifer Thickness – 30 m • Completion Date – September 7th, • Available Drawdown – 45 m 2016 • Diameter – 0.30 m (12”) • Step Test – September 7, 2016 • Depth – 97.5 m • 72 hour Test – Sept 12-15, 2016 • Screen Length – 7.9 m (underway) • Transmitting Capacity – 75 L/s Parameter Step-Test 72 Hour Test Pumping Rate (L/s) 20/40/55 55 Drawdown (m) 0.45/0.95/1.51 TBD Specific Capacity 36 (at 55 L/s) TBD (L/s/m) Water Quality TBD TBD Results 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution – Aurora 19 Monitoring Wells 19 LSRCA Regulation Area – Green Lane 20 19 LSRCA Regulation Area – Aurora 5 21 19 Source Water Protection 22 •Class
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations
    Brant North Women's Institute set up a recycling display at the Lynden Park Mall in Brantford. A lot of interest was indicated in the material the women had available. Recently appointed Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Deputy Minister Rita Burak, left, visited the Federated Women's Institutes of Ontario Board meeting in August. She is pictured here with FWIO President Margaret Munro, centre, and FWIO President Elect Peggy Knapp. Ms. Burak came to OMAF finm the Ministry of Housing. Prior to that she was Assistant Deputy Minister with OMAF. Congratulations . Congratulations to the following groups on the recent celebration of anniversaries . Burford WI, Brant South . 90 Branchton WI, Waterloo South . 85 Kintore WI, Oxford North . .85 Moorefield WI, Wellington North . .85 Wellington Centre WI . 85 Cavan WI, Durham East . .75 Dungannon WI, Huron West . 75 Jarratt-Cre igton WI, Simcoe North . .75 Maple Valley WI, Simcoe West . .75 Rushview WI, Dufferin North . .75 Gleneden WI, Grey South . 70 Princeton-Woodbury WI , Brant South . .70 Fairfield WI, Leeds East . 65 Pittsburgh WI, Fro ntenac . .. 65 Derry West WI, Peel South . 60 Summerville WI, Oxford South . .60 Tyendinaga East WI . 60 South Line Brant WI, Bruce East . .55 Bolsover WI, Victoria West . 40 Palmyra WI, Kent East . 40 Since 1985, the Tweedsmuir Committee of the Magnetawan Women's Institute has Lookout Bay WI, Prescott . .35 collected photos and histories on all the houses and buildings in the village. This Gillies Hill WI, Bruce East . .30 summer, the work culminated in a community display of the information . Pictured North Emily WI, Victo ria West .
    [Show full text]