Appendix a Public Consultation Record

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Public Consultation Record Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Appendix A Public Consultation Record TMIG | THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD _____________________________________________________________________________ CITY OF PICKERING Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study COMMUNICATIONS PLAN▪ FEBRUARY 2015 TMIG | The Municipal Infrastructure Group Ltd 8800 Dufferin Street, Suite 200 Vaughan ON CA L4K 0C5 t 905.738.5700 f 905.738.0065 www.tmig.ca this report has been formatted for double-sided printing Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study CITY OF PICKERING _______________________________________________________________________________________ COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ▪ FEBRUARY 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................... 1 2 Mandatory Public Consultation under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment .................... 2 2.1 Notice of Commencement ......................................... 2 2.2 PIC # 1 ...................................................................... 2 2.3 PIC # 2 ...................................................................... 3 2.4 Notice of Completion ................................................. 4 2.5 Tracking .................................................................... 4 3 Committee Meetings ............................................................ 5 3.1 Technical Committee ................................................. 5 3.2 Steering Committee ................................................... 6 Appendices Appendix A: Stakeholder Contact Documentation Appendix B: Notice of Commencement Appendix C: Public Information Centre # 1 Appendix D: Public Information Centre # 2 Appendix E: Notice of Completion Appendix F: Technical Committee Meeting Minutes Appendix G: Steering Committee Meeting Minutes THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE i Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study CITY OF PICKERING COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ▪ FEBRUARY 2015 ________________________________________________________________________________________ PAGE ii _____________________________________________________________________________ THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study CITY OF PICKERING _______________________________________________________________________________________ COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ▪ FEBRUARY 2015 1 Introduction This document briefly describes the communications planned throughout the Downtown Stormwater Management and Diversion Study. The communications plan covers the required public and agency consultation required for the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, as well as the Technical Committee and Steering Committee meetings planned for the project. This is intended to be a ‘living document’, and will be continuously updated to record all relevant communications delivered and received over the course of the study. THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD ____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE 1 Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study CITY OF PICKERING COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ▪ FEBRUARY 2015 ________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Mandatory Public Consultation under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment The Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) requires contact with the public at certain points during the EA study. The study was initiated as a Schedule C project under the Class EA, as it was anticipated that the preferred solution could involve a diversion of flow from the Krosno Creek watershed to the Pine Creek watershed. During the evaluation of alternatives, it became apparent that the preferred solution would not involve a diversion of flow between watersheds and would instead have minimal adverse environmental impacts. The study has therefore been completed as a Schedule B project under the Class EA. Regardless, the public consultation program was maintained from the original Schedule C work plan, and therefore two public information centres (PICs) for the project were held. The public was also notified of the project through the notices of commencement and completion. 2.1 Notice of Commencement The notice of commencement was published in the Pickering News Advertiser for two consecutive weeks starting February 13, 2013, and posted on the City of Pickering website shortly thereafter. Copies of the notice were also distributed to all addresses in the Study Area (Krosno Creek watershed) using the Canada Post flyer service. A copy of the Notice of Commencement is included in Appendix B. In addition, copies of the notice of commencement were mailed to all relevant agencies and key stakeholders that were previously identified through the public consultation for the Pickering City Centre visioning exercise. Copies of the notice letter and fax-back form are included in Appendix B. A number of residents and agency contacts replied to the notice of commencement, requesting to be included on the project mailing list. The full annotated contact list is provided Appendix A. The Federal Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development provided a list of First Nations contacts that may have an interest in the study. A copy of the Notice of Commencement was subsequently mailed to all suggested First Nations contacts. A total of thirteen (13) agency contacts replied to the mailing, indicating their desire to be contacted over the course of the study. Five (5) of the stakeholders from the Downtown Pickering visioning study responded to the notice, and four (4) of the First Nations contacts responded to the subsequent First Nations mailing. In addition, ten (10) residents responded to the Notice of Commencement flyer, primarily via phone and e-mail. The Contact List included in Appendix A is annotated with responses to the notices. 2.2 PIC # 1 The first Public Information Centre (PIC) was held on Wednesday, February 19, 2014. The PIC was first advertised in the Pickering News Advertiser for two consecutive weeks starting February 5, 2014, and flyers with information on the PIC were distributed to all addresses in the Study Area (Krosno Creek watershed). A copy of the Notice of PIC # 1 was also mailed to all of the stakeholders who responded to the Notice of Commencement. A copy of the Notice of PIC # 1 and the letter issued to interested stakeholders are included in Appendix C. One person contacted TMIG in response to the Notice who indicated that they could not attend but requested to be added to the project mailing list. PAGE 2 _____________________________________________________________________________ THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LTD Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Study CITY OF PICKERING _______________________________________________________________________________________ COMMUNICATIONS PLAN ▪ FEBRUARY 2015 The PIC was hosted at the City of Pickering Civic Complex from 6:30 pm to 8:30 pm. A total of 15 display panels were set up around the lobby outside the Council Chambers, and TMIG delivered a presentation in the Council Chambers at 7:00 pm. Copies of the display panels are included in Appendix C. A total of 17 attendees were recorded on the sign-in sheet. One person completed and deposited a Comment Form at the meeting, and four additional Comment Forms were received via fax, e-mail and traditional mail before the cut-off date of March 1, 2014. Copies of the completed comment forms are included in Appendix C. The following key issues were raised at PIC # 1. Maintenance: A number of attendees raised concerns regarding debris in the Krosno Creek channel, obstructing flow and potentially blocking culverts. The majority of these concerns related to the more natural sections of Krosno Creek from upstream of Alyssum Street to downstream of the northern Sandy Beach Road culvert. Complete Elimination of Flooding: Some attendees expressed an interest in ‘making the water go away’, or at least completely containing the flow to the existing channel block. These residents have had their property flooded from Krosno Creek in the past, and are concerned anytime that water levels in Krosno Creek rise. Flooding at and Downstream of Sandy Beach Road: The owners of the property on the east side of Sandy Beach Road north of Streamside Court were concerned that flooding impacts at and downstream of Sandy Beach Road were not properly addressed, particularly relating to the capacity and potential obstruction of the culverts for the sanitary sewer crossing of Krosno Creek east of Sandy Beach Road. It was acknowledged that the homes on the west side of Sandy Beach Road were not impacted by flooding in the August 2005 storm event, but there was flooding at Streamside and Willowside Courts due to floodwater from Krosno Creek spilling southward down Sandy Beach Road. Confusion with Study Title: Several attendees suggested that the study name (Krosno Creek Diversion Project) was misleading, as the diversion of flow to Pine Creek is not the recommended solution. These attendees had interests in the impacts of the diversion to Pine Creek. TMIG and City staff committed to providing answers to the first three items listed above at PIC # 2. 2.3 PIC # 2 The second PIC was held on Wednesday, May 28, 2014. The PIC was advertised in the Pickering News Advertiser for two consecutive weeks starting
Recommended publications
  • Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14
    Stage 4: Aurora 5 Site - 24 Hour Testing 14 14 Stage 5: Recommend a Preferred Solution 15 •Rehabilitate Aurora Well No. 5, Aurora Well No. 6 and Newmarket Well No. 15 •Construct new wells at: • Green Lane • Aurora Well No. 5 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution – Green Lane 16 Green Lane Well Construction: • Aquifer Thickness – 31 m • Transmitting Capacity – 104 L/s • Available Drawdown – 33 m • Completion Date – July 27th, 2016 • Diameter – 0.30 m (12”) • Step Test – July 28, 2016 • Depth – 93 m • 72 hour Test - August 2-5, 2016 • Screen Length – 10.7 m Parameter Step-Test 72 Hour Test Pumping Rate 18/36/55 55 (L/s) Drawdown (m) 0.14/0.37/0.77 3.8 Specific Capacity 71 (at 55 L/s) 15 (L/s/m) Water Quality Hardness and iron Hardness and iron Results above ODWQS above ODWQS 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution - Green Lane 17 Monitoring Wells 17 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution - Aurora 18 Aurora Well Construction: • Aquifer Thickness – 30 m • Completion Date – September 7th, • Available Drawdown – 45 m 2016 • Diameter – 0.30 m (12”) • Step Test – September 7, 2016 • Depth – 97.5 m • 72 hour Test – Sept 12-15, 2016 • Screen Length – 7.9 m (underway) • Transmitting Capacity – 75 L/s Parameter Step-Test 72 Hour Test Pumping Rate (L/s) 20/40/55 55 Drawdown (m) 0.45/0.95/1.51 TBD Specific Capacity 36 (at 55 L/s) TBD (L/s/m) Water Quality TBD TBD Results 19 Stage 6: Confirm Preferred Solution – Aurora 19 Monitoring Wells 19 LSRCA Regulation Area – Green Lane 20 19 LSRCA Regulation Area – Aurora 5 21 19 Source Water Protection 22 •Class
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10: Consultation Record
    Environmental Assessment chapter 10. consultation record Table of Contents page 10. Consultation Record ............................................................................................................. 10-1 10.1 Environmental Assessment Consultation Activities and Results (June 2005 – August 2011) ...... 10-2 10.1.1 Public Consultation Activities and Results ........................................................................ 10-2 10.1.1.1 Notices ............................................................................................................ 10-2 10.1.1.2 Mailing Lists .................................................................................................... 10-3 10.1.1.3 Public Forums ................................................................................................. 10-3 10.1.1.4 Community Liaison Committee....................................................................... 10-8 10.1.1.5 Newsletters and Flyers ................................................................................. 10-11 10.1.1.6 Web-Based Information ................................................................................ 10-12 10.1.1.7 Community Workshops and Events ............................................................. 10-12 10.1.1.8 Lower Don Lands Planning Process Public Consultation ............................ 10-14 10.1.1.9 Other Public Feedback ................................................................................. 10-15 10.1.1.10 Summary of Public Issues and Responses
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Powwowguide.Pdf
    B:9.5” T:8.5” B:12” T:11” Simply worth celebrating Enjoy a seamless stay at Delta Hotels by Marriott Sault Ste. For reservations, call 888.236.2427 Marie Waterfront. or visit Marriott.com/YAMDS. Located in the heart of Sault Ste. Marie, take in life’s simple Delta Hotels by Marriott® pleasures from the city’s only hotel offering genuine waterfront Sault Ste. Marie Waterfront views. Our welcoming guest rooms are furnished with the bare 208 St. Mary’s River Drive maximum—ultra-comfortable beds, clean, stylish showers with Sault Ste. Marie P6A 5V4 just the right pressure and spacious work areas. Choose from Canada 13 versatile meeting and event spaces with state-of-the-art 70 5.9 4 9.0 611 equipment or host your social event on the seasonal outdoor patio to meet up, wind down or just to enjoy a casual bite. Celebrate the simple made perfect with Delta Hotels. DeltaHotels DeltaHotels DeltaHotelsLTD © 2018 Marriott International, Inc. All rights reserved. 1013875 File Name: 1013875_5203_DLT_GreatLakesGuide_FP_8.5inWx11inH_v3.1.indd Option: QC/QA Client: Marriott Field Marketing Media:Magazine Publication: MFM Marsha #: YAMDS-2018-CCOE Links: Fonts: Inks: Account Mgr DE_YAMDS_Exterior_SWOP.tif (CMYK; 914 ppi; Lettera Pro (Regular) Cyan Title: DLT_GreatLakesGuide_FP_8.5inWx11inH 32.8%; 173.2MB) Basic Commercial LT Com Magenta Studio Artist YAMDS_Logo_DH_white_cmyk.eps (21.15%; 2.0MB) (Light, Bold, Roman) Yellow Black Q.C. Trim: 8.5” x 11” Client Bleed: 0.5” x 0.5” Safety: 0” x 0” Artist: Lania Yu / Michael Liebergot ICC: SWOP2006_Coated3v2.icc Station: OMG-USNY-OSX-008 / Lania Yu Saved: 4-16-2018 10:53 AM Workflow: CMYK Current: 4-16-2018 10:53 AM Message from Grand Council Chief Aaniin, pride and belonging” – we are all on her legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNE 2009 Madahbee Seeks Unity on Rights AAMJIWNAANG FN – Patrick Years
    Page 1 Volume 21 Issue 5 Published monthly by the Union of Ontario Indians - Anishinabek Nation Single Copy: $2.00 JUNE 2009 Madahbee seeks unity on rights AAMJIWNAANG FN – Patrick years. Madahbee’s first official act as Hare was elected over Alder- Grand Council Chief of the An- ville Chief J.R. Marsden and Greg ishinabek Nation was to stage a Plain of Aamjiwnaang FN near ceremony calling for unity among Sarnia, host community for the the 42 member communities. 2009 assembly. Madahbee and re-elected Dep- Serpent River FN Chief Isa- uty Grand Chief Glen dore Day, assisting in Hare distributed squares the Unity Ceremony, of burgundy cloth bear- said the Governance ing the image of the An- Cloths were intended to ishinabek Thunderbird, symbolize “the work we along with tobacco ties, have to do together to to representatives of clarify the relationship each member First Na- we have with the British tion at the annual general Grand Council Chief Crown and the govern- assembly to remind del- Patrick Madahbee ment of Canada.” egates of their collective The ceremony began Protest growing against dump proposal responsibility “to move the rights- with the Governance Cloths placed Lorna Murray is one of a growing number of landowners supporting a group of women from Beausoleil First based agenda forward.” in a pile on the floor between fold- Nation who are protesting a proposal to create a garbage dump in Simcoe County directly above one of the The traditional stand-up elec- ed British and Canadian flags. One purest sources of drinking water on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Demonstration (Npd) Indigenous Engagement Report
    GENERAL, REPORT NUCLEAR POWER DEMONSTRATION (NPD) INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT NPD DECOMMISSIONING 64-513130-REPT-001 Revision 3 Prepared by: 2020/03/31 Margot Thompson Date Communications Officer Reviewed by: 2020/03/31 Brian Wilcox Date Director, NPD and WR-1 Reactor Decommissioning Approved by: 2020/03/31 Mitch MacKay Date Manager, ERM Stakeholder Relations Effective date: 2020/03/31 UNRESTRICTED © Canadian Nuclear Laboratories This page is for Content Controls that apply to this document. If no Content Controls apply, none will be listed. Choose all content controls that apply before saving as a docx. UNRESTRICTED GENERAL, REPORT UNRESTRICTED NUCLEAR POWER DEMONSTRATION (NPD) INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT 64-513130-REPT-001 REV. 3 REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Details of Rev. Prepared By Reviewed By Approved By No. 3 2020/03/31 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson B. Wilcox M. MacKay 2 2017/10/27 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn 1 2017/09/15 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn R1D1 2017/08/21 Issued for “Review and Comment”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn M. Vickerd 0 2016/08/08 Issued as “Approved for Use”. M. Thompson P. Daly P. Quinn D2 2016/08/08 Issued for “Review and Comment”. C. Donak P. Daly P. Quinn J. Luiz M. Vickerd N. Stack T. Butz D1 2016/06/30 Issued for “Review and Comment”. C. Donak P. Daly P. Quinn J. Luiz M. Vickerd N. Stack T. Butz GENERAL, REPORT UNRESTRICTED NUCLEAR POWER DEMONSTRATION (NPD) INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT 64-513130-REPT-001 REV.
    [Show full text]