DOCSLIB.ORG

The Manchu Way: the Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China Free Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Manchu Way: the Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China Free Download THE MANCHU WAY: THE EIGHT BANNERS AND ETHNIC IDENTITY IN LATE IMPERIAL CHINA FREE DOWNLOAD Mark C. Elliott | 608 pages | 01 Jul 2001 | Stanford University Press | 9780804746847 | English | Palo Alto, United States Eight Banners By the late 19th century, the Qing Dynasty began training and creating New Army units based on Western training, equipment and organization. Jurchen, as it happens, had not been translated into Manchus. A system arising out The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China the Manchu conquest of China, the banners The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China to organize the dynasty's military forces and preserve their elite status. Anne Walthall. Popular curiosity about this odd custom in Qing was partly satisfied by the nineteenth-century bannerman-writer Fu-ge, who explained in his book of "jottings" that naming children for their grandparents' ages was a way of wishing longevity to the newly born. Without proper rendering supportyou may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Manchu alphabet. Bannermen were segregated from Han civilians in their own garrisons. Kimberly Kagan. Although the banners were instrumental in the Qing Empire takeover of China proper in the 17th century from the Ming Empirethey began to fall behind rising Western powers in the 18th century. These Han Chinese infiltrators were said to be good military troops and their skills at marching and archery were up to par so that the Zhapu lieutenant general couldn't differentiate them from true Manchus in terms of military skills. A subject matter that includes the eight banners that Manchus and some others were classified and the larger but subordinate purely Han Green Standard, the importance of hunts, the strength of a bow that a soldier should be able to pull, the less formal communications between Manchu officials and emperors sometimes with the emperor going so far as to refer to "us" -- shocking for a Chinese emperorthe walled garrisons where Manchu bannermen lived and which were, in theory, only temporary postings for people whose true home was Beijing causing much conflict about where people should be buried for proper ritesand more Their last name was changed to the Manchu sounding "Tohoro". Since Han bannermen were treated as semi-Manchus according to the law, Manchu bannerwomen were allowed to marry Han bannermen. After defeats inflicted by the Chinese General Yuan Chonghuan upon the Manchus, [9] [10] the Manchu then decided to absorb Chinese prisoners who knew how to use guns into their army to supplement their forces. A Military History of China. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. The great victories of and had placed eastern Manchuria under the Latter Chin's rule. The actual sizes often varied substantially from these standards. Han bannermen also adopted Manchu naming practices such as naming their offspring with numbers. Many bannermen forged genealogies of their origin since they did not have any, and then these decided whether or not they were in a Chinese or a Jurchen banner. Johns Hopkins University Press. To win the support and cooperation of Ming generals in Liaodong, Nurhaci gave them Aisin Gioro women as wives. One definition of Manchu was the "Old Manchu" including the Aisin Gioro clan, of the original founding populations who spoke Manchu and who were the basis of the banner system. The three "upper" banners both Yellow Banners and the Plain White Banner were under the nominal command of the emperor himself, whereas the five "lower" banners were commanded by others. Peter Lang. Authority control NDL : Koxinga's rattan shield troops became famous for fighting and defeating the Dutch in Taiwan. University Press of Kentucky. Kommissionverlag O. People from both sides moved between Liaodong and Nurgan. Han Chinese in the Manchu Banners became Manchucized. Bordered Yellow Banner. One of their descendants was the Manchu Duanfangan official in late Qing dynasty China. This is the first academic treatment written from the perspectice of the Manchu themselves, and the first work in English to draw extensively from Manchu-language original sources. The majority who did not have them had to concoct them. Han Chinese in Ming-ruled Liaodong who defected to the Jurchens after they conquered Liaoding were called "frontiersmen" since they had lived on the frontiers of Ming territory. Spence In Xi'an during the Xinhai Revolutionimpoverished Han soldiers took young Manchu women as wives after seizing the banner garrison. In the Qianlong Emperor's celebrated Ten Great Campaignsthe banner armies fought alongside troops of the Green Standard Army, expanding the Qing empire to its greatest territorial extent. Ferrara Those who were considered Jurchen adopted a Jurchen lifestyle, spoke the Jurchen language, and inhabited the eastern part of present-day Jilin Province. The term niru means "arrow" in the Manchu language, and was originally the Manchu name for a hunting party, which would be armed with bows and arrows. No evidence suggests that aftermost of the booi were Han Chinese. Daniel Burton-Rose rated it really liked it May 03, For the best writing in the book, you should look through the notes at its end. Drawing on recent critical notions of ethnicity, the author explores the evolution of the "Eight Banners, a unique Manchu system of social and military organization that was instrumental in the conquest of the Ming. Servants of the dynasty: palace women in world history. Huangtaiji included Han Chinese in his government and adopted the Han style of government. The banner system was established by Nurhaci in the early seventeenth century. It will also be stimulating for readers interested in ethnicity, identity, and the creation of empires. On the contrary, Manchu, Mongol, and Nikan identities had all emerged from mutually contradictory identifiers such as genealogies, language preferences, and occupation, and all under the pressure of Hung Taiji's drive to complete and emperorship between and There are clear references to military units called "banners" in Korean sources in and sources dating from describe the "banner" The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China structure. Li was made a banner general, was given gifts of slaves and serfs, and was betrothed to a young woman of the Aisin Gioro clan. The victor was Nurhaci's eighth The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China, Hong Taiji, who had been the general commanding the palin yellow and bordered yellow banners. Over time, the Eight Banners became synonymous with Manchu identity even as their military strength vanished. Under Hong Taiji, the banner armies participated in two invasions of Korea under the Joseon dynasty, first in and again in China consisted of multiple ethnic groups, primarily HanMongol and Manchu. The Eight Banners were then created from the old black Chinese banners and Jurchen banners The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China made equal to each other. The Forgotten Christians of Hangzhou. Banner membership depended on the primary language of the bannermen. The Mongol banners were also created around this time. Manchu Bannermen who needed money helped falsify registration for Han Chinese servants being adopted into the Manchu banners and Manchu families who lacked sons were allowed to adopt their servant's sons or servants themselves. He also handles economic aspects of the Eight Banners system in a way which is both meaningful and accessible--casual readers can skim the tables on military expenditure, but specialists will appreciate the care he takes with estimates and his awareness of limitations in our sources..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manchus: a Horse of a Different Color
    History in the Making Volume 8 Article 7 January 2015 Manchus: A Horse of a Different Color Hannah Knight CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the Asian History Commons Recommended Citation Knight, Hannah (2015) "Manchus: A Horse of a Different Color," History in the Making: Vol. 8 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol8/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Manchus: A Horse of a Different Color by Hannah Knight Abstract: The question of identity has been one of the biggest questions addressed to humanity. Whether in terms of a country, a group or an individual, the exact definition is almost as difficult to answer as to what constitutes a group. The Manchus, an ethnic group in China, also faced this dilemma. It was an issue that lasted throughout their entire time as rulers of the Qing Dynasty (1644- 1911) and thereafter. Though the guidelines and group characteristics changed throughout that period one aspect remained clear: they did not sinicize with the Chinese Culture. At the beginning of their rule, the Manchus implemented changes that would transform the appearance of China, bringing it closer to the identity that the world recognizes today. In the course of examining three time periods, 1644, 1911, and the 1930’s, this paper looks at the significant events of the period, the changing aspects, and the Manchus and the Qing Imperial Court’s relations with their greater Han Chinese subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Did the Imperially Commissioned Manchu Rites for Sacrifices to The
    religions Article Did the Imperially Commissioned Manchu Rites for Sacrifices to the Spirits and to Heaven Standardize Manchu Shamanism? Xiaoli Jiang Department of History and Culture, Jilin Normal University, Siping 136000, China; [email protected] Received: 26 October 2018; Accepted: 4 December 2018; Published: 5 December 2018 Abstract: The Imperially Commissioned Manchu Rites for Sacrifices to the Spirits and to Heaven (Manzhou jishen jitian dianli), the only canon on shamanism compiled under the auspices of the Qing dynasty, has attracted considerable attention from a number of scholars. One view that is held by a vast majority of these scholars is that the promulgation of the Manchu Rites by the Qing court helped standardize shamanic rituals, which resulted in a decline of wild ritual practiced then and brought about a similarity of domestic rituals. However, an in-depth analysis of the textual context of the Manchu Rites, as well as a close inspection of its various editions reveal that the Qing court had no intention to formalize shamanism and did not enforce the Manchu Rites nationwide. In fact, the decline of the Manchu wild ritual can be traced to the preconquest period, while the domestic ritual had been formed before the Manchu Rites was prepared and were not unified even at the end of the Qing dynasty. With regard to the ritual differences among the various Manchu clans, the Qing rulers took a more benign view and it was unnecessary to standardize them. The incorporation of the Chinese version of the Manchu Rites into Siku quanshu demonstrates the Qing court’s struggles to promote its cultural status and legitimize its rule of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Palace Machine Work Palace Machine the Making
    11 ASIAN HISTORY Siebert, (eds) & Ko Chen Making the Machine Palace Work Edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko Making the Palace Machine Work Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire Making the Palace Machine Work Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hågerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Roger Greatrex, Lund University David Henley, Leiden University Ariel Lopez, University of the Philippines Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University Making the Palace Machine Work Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire Edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Artful adaptation of a section of the 1750 Complete Map of Beijing of the Qianlong Era (Qianlong Beijing quantu 乾隆北京全圖) showing the Imperial Household Department by Martina Siebert based on the digital copy from the Digital Silk Road project (http://dsr.nii.ac.jp/toyobunko/II-11-D-802, vol. 8, leaf 7) Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6372 035 9 e-isbn 978 90 4855 322 8 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789463720359 nur 692 Creative Commons License CC BY NC ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) The authors / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2021 Some rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, any part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise).
    [Show full text]
  • The Diary of a Manchu Soldier in Seventeenth-Century China: “My
    THE DIARY OF A MANCHU SOLDIER IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY CHINA The Manchu conquest of China inaugurated one of the most successful and long-living dynasties in Chinese history: the Qing (1644–1911). The wars fought by the Manchus to invade China and consolidate the power of the Qing imperial house spanned over many decades through most of the seventeenth century. This book provides the first Western translation of the diary of Dzengmeo, a young Manchu officer, and recounts the events of the War of the Three Feudatories (1673–1682), fought mostly in southwestern China and widely regarded as the most serious internal military challenge faced by the Manchus before the Taiping rebellion (1851–1864). The author’s participation in the campaign provides the close-up, emotional perspective on what it meant to be in combat, while also providing a rare window into the overall organization of the Qing army, and new data in key areas of military history such as combat, armament, logistics, rank relations, and military culture. The diary represents a fine and rare example of Manchu personal writing, and shows how critical the development of Manchu studies can be for our knowledge of China’s early modern history. Nicola Di Cosmo joined the Institute for Advanced Study, School of Historical Studies, in 2003 as the Luce Foundation Professor in East Asian Studies. He is the author of Ancient China and Its Enemies (Cambridge University Press, 2002) and his research interests are in Mongol and Manchu studies and Sino-Inner Asian relations. ROUTLEDGE STUDIES
    [Show full text]
  • Bannerman and Townsman: Ethnic Tension in Nineteenth-Century Jiangnan
    Bannerman and Townsman: Ethnic Tension in Nineteenth-Century Jiangnan Mark Elliott Late Imperial China, Volume 11, Number 1, June 1990, pp. 36-74 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/late.1990.0005 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/late/summary/v011/11.1.elliott.html Access Provided by Harvard University at 02/16/13 5:36PM GMT Vol. 11, No. 1 Late Imperial ChinaJune 1990 BANNERMAN AND TOWNSMAN: ETHNIC TENSION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY JIANGNAN* Mark Elliott Introduction Anyone lucky enough on the morning of July 21, 1842, to escape the twenty-foot high, four-mile long walls surrounding the city of Zhenjiang would have beheld a depressing spectacle: the fall of the city to foreign invaders. Standing on a hill, looking northward across the city toward the Yangzi, he might have decried the masts of more than seventy British ships anchored in a thick nest on the river, or perhaps have noticed the strange shapes of the four armored steamships that, contrary to expecta- tions, had successfully penetrated the treacherous lower stretches of China's main waterway. Might have seen this, indeed, except that his view most likely would have been screened by the black clouds of smoke swirling up from one, then two, then three of the city's five gates, as fire spread to the guardtowers atop them. His ears dinned by the report of rifle and musket fire and the roar of cannon and rockets, he would scarcely have heard the sounds of panic as townsmen, including his own relatives and friends, screamed to be allowed to leave the city, whose gates had been held shut since the week before by order of the commander of * An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Manchu Studies (Manzokushi kenkyùkai) at Meiji University, Tokyo, in November 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinax Course Notes
    Part 6: The Manchus and the Qing 23: The Qing Vision of Empire Professor Mark Elliot taught most of this section, allowing us to benefit from his personal focus on the Qing and the Manchus. Professor Bol stepped in for one week to teach The Scholars and Prosperous Suzhou, which must have been his special interest. It was one of the most fascinating weeks of the course129 and by far the toughest. Historical Overview The origins of the Qing dynasty date back to the 1630s with a peasant rebellion led by Li Zicheng, a former postal official. Indeed, this may be the first recorded instance of an individual 'going postal.' 130 Li's rebellion spread through central China, drawing upon the anger of farmers, clerks, and soldiers who were devastated by, among other things, the inflation of copper currency against the silver required for tax payments.131 By the 1640s, the rebel army was moving toward Beijing. Meanwhile, the Manchus, descendents of the Jurchens of the Jin dynasty, were uniting tribal groups northeast of China, forging alliances with the eastern Mongols and raiding the Ming, all under the leadership of Nurhaci. By the late 1620s, the Ming had lost control of the northeast. Hong Taiji, Nurhaci's son and successor, re-organized and strengthened the Jin state, and in the 1630s conquered Korea, bolstering Manchu security and prestige. In 1636, Hong renamed his dynasty the Great Qing (da qing). In 1644, Li's rebels captured Beijing, leading the Ming emperor to hang himself. Shortly after that, the Ming general Wu Sangui, who was guarding the Great Wall at the Shanhai Pass, allied with the Manchus against Li Zicheng, deciding that he preferred the organized armies of the Manchus to the pillaging forces of the rebellion.
    [Show full text]
  • "Making Mongols" Pamela Kyle Crossley of the Diverse Processes
    "Making Mongols" Pamela Kyle Crossley Of the diverse processes of identity formation in very late Ming and early Qing eras, the emergence of the "Mongols" bears a striking resemblance to the emergence of the "Manchus," in this way: It shows, more overtly than many other cases examined in this volume, the persistent and deliberate imprint of the state. To a certain degree this is an artifact of the documentation. The Mongols, like the Manchus but unlike the Yao, Dan or She, were the objects of direct historicizing by the Qing, with extensive narrative, linguistic and geographical treatises devoted to them written and published under imperial sponsorship in the later seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. These projects and the administrative programs that paralleled them could be influential in the identity choices of the individuals to whom they applied. Nevertheless the evidence is manifest that in the instances of the Manchus and the Mongols the pressures exerted by the Qing court were not decisive in determining affiliation, sentiment or behavior. "Ethnicity," for these groups, was in the end a product of dynamics that can be compared to the processes producing the same kinds of phenomena among the less directly documented peoples of central and southern China: stability of affective connection to the institutions of the state, local scenarios promoting greater or lesser degrees of integration, and coherence of communities.1 Thus making a distinction between the peoples sponsored by, or incorporated into the conquest elite of, the Qing empire (that is, the Manchus, Mongols, hanjun primarily) and other peoples of the early Qing era should be recognized as primarily an invention of the empire, for its own purposes.2 Becoming bannermen, or objects of state historiography, cannot be shown to have produced more enduring or more consolidated concepts of identities among these groups; perhaps, on the contrary, it only subjected them to more systematic cultural stereotyping and social fragmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicola Di Cosmo, University of Canterbury
    Nicola Di Cosmo, University of Canterbury European Technology and Manchu Power: Reflections on the "Military Revolution" in Seventeenth Century China Paperfor the International Congress ofHistorical Sciences, Oslo 2000 DRAFT COPY - NOT FOR CITATION "The rebel soldiers, positioned at the entrance of the mountain pass were not ready [for our attack]. As our troops advanced, we could hear the incessant sound of artillery. On the road we came across some shields that had been dropped by our own troops [during the charge]. Carrying a large flag, I ran forward. As we entered the mountain pass, we saw the rebel army which, rushing out of the encampment, was lining up abatises, shield-bearing troops and elephants. Our Green Standard (Chinese) soldiers charged. The fire from cannons and muskets sounded like frying beans, the earth itself was shaking." This battle scene is described in the eyewitness account of Zengshou, a Manchu officer who served in the Qing army during the war to suppress the rebellion of the so-called "Three Feudatories," which inflamed southern China from 1673 to 1681. In the end, the government forces won, ensuring the continuing rule of the Manchu dynasty in China (1644-1912). The cannons mentioned in the description of the battle, whether fired from the government or from the rebel side, are likely to owe a considerable debt to European military technology. In fact, it is commonly acknowledged that the war effort was heavily conditioned by the willingness of one Belgian Jesuit, Ferdinand Verbiest, to design and cast "modem" cannons, light and easily transportable, which could be deployed on the rugged terrain of southwest China in order to pound the mountain strongholds of the rebel forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Qing Lifanyuan and the Solon People of the 17Th-18Th Centuries
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 1, Issue 4 – Pages 253-266 The Qing Lifanyuan and the Solon People of the 17th-18th Centuries By Chia Ning The exploration of the newly published Manchu tiben leads to this first dedicated study of the relationship between the hunting Solon people in Heilongjiang and the Qing Inner Asian governing institution, the Lifanyuan. The discoveries impact our understanding of Manchu statecraft through its interaction with a small hunting minority. Introduction The relationship between the Solon people, natives of Heilongjiang, and the Lifanyuan, a Qing (1636-1911) frontier governing institution, has remained an understudied subject.1 This research explores the newly published Qingchao qianqi lifanyuan manmengwen tiben (Early Qing Manchu and Mongolian Lifanyuan Tiben2 or EQMMLT later), and develops the first study on this important subject in Western scholarship. The name of the Lifanyuan in Manchu, Tulergi golo be dasara jurgan, means the ministry that governs the outer (namely the non-Chinese) regions. All the 1,613 tiben3 under investigation were written by the Lifanyuan minister, or vice minister occasionally, to the emperor during 1653-1795. Among them fourteen provide the archival evidence4 that the Qing frontier administration cannot be understood properly if the full story of the Solon is not considered in the study of the Lifanyuan, and Qing empire-building cannot be comprehended integrally if the examination of Qing statecraft continues to overlook the Solon-Lifanyuan relationship. The Heilongjiang General, appointed in 1683 as a split from the Ninggutai General in Eastern Heilongjiang,5 played a key role in the Solon-Lifanyuan Professor, History Department, Central College, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Structure and Function of Chengdu's Manchu City at the End of the Qing Dynasty and the Beginning of the Republic of China
    2020 3rd International Workshop on Advances in Social Sciences (IWASS 2020) Changes in the Structure and Function of Chengdu's Manchu City at the End of the Qing Dynasty and the Beginning of the Republic of China Aiqing Yu School of History and Culture, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China Keywords: Qing dynasty, Chengdu, Manchu city, Xinhai revolution Abstract: In the last year of Kangxi, the Qing government moved the Jingzhou Eight Banner Soldiers to station in Chengdu. In order to strengthen the control of the western Sichuan ethnic area and to shield Tibet and other places, after the Manchu and Mongolian Eight Banner Soldiers were stationed in Chengdu, the building was “ Manchu City “. After the Revolution of 1911, the city walls were demolished one after another, and were no longer military camps. The original closed urban spatial pattern was broken, and the function of the urban area gradually changed. 1. Introduction “Manchu City” is also known as Less City in Chengdu. The ancient Less City was first established around 307 BC. Emperor Qin Huiwang sent Zhang Yi to build Chengdu City, which was the beginning of Chengdu's city. For thousands of years, the city site has not changed and the city name has not been changed. It is known as “the oldest cultural city in the world's megacities”. [1] After the war in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, the city buildings in Chengdu were basically destroyed. The years of Shunzhi and Kangxi were the initial stages of the reconstruction of Chengdu City. The Qing court recruited immigrants from other provinces to reclaim the wasteland in Sichuan, and then Chengdu city was rebuilt.
    [Show full text]
  • BR The-Eight-Nation-Alliance.Pdf
    Welcome Letter Dear Delegates, Welcome to the 32nd annual North American Model United Nations Conference at the University of Toronto! I, and the rest of the NAMUN staff, look forward to working with you and seeing your impressive skills in negotiation, military strategy, political maneuvering, historical research and any other talents you may bring to the table. It is with my pleasure that I invite you to be a delegate in the 8 Nations Alliance Committee of the Boxer Rebellion Historical Crisis. You will be working closely with the NAMUN Crisis staff, as well as communicating with our fellow Boxer Rebellion Committee, the Qing court. As we turn back to the beginning of the 20th century, you will be able to influence not only China’s future, but also those of the international community. I look forward to discussing such topics as imperialism, clashing ideologies, religious differences, anti-foreign sentiments and much more. As for a bit of background on myself, I intend to pursue a double major in neuroscience and either history or international relations (I am a tad bit indecisive). This will be my fourth in Model United Nations, and my second year chairing a historical crisis committee. Since I’ve acted as a delegate in a previous Boxer Rebellion Historical simulation, I know what it is like to be in your shoes, and I am excited to be your committee chair this year! Below, you will find the background guide which briefly covers the historical background of the Boxer Rebellion, the main issues we will be dealing with in committee, and the state of affairs before our first committee meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Council of the Qing Dynasty, 1853
    VMUN 2019 Grand Council of the Qing Dynasty, 1853 CRISIS BACKGROUND GUIDE Vancouver Model United Nations The Eighteenth Annual Session | January 25–27, 2019 Proclaimed in the fourth year of the Xianfeng Era: Jerry Xu Secretary-General To my loyal subjects, I welcome you all to the Grand Council. You are my most loyal and trusted servants, as well as the delegates from Western nations that China has seen fit to recognize. You will have the Nick Young privilege and honour of serving the Emperor, and through me, the heavens. Chief of Staff For centuries, China was the undisputed centre of the world, our lands the envy of all Angelina Zhang civilizations. Yet, our power is no longer unchallenged. Having opened up our culture to the Director-General rest of the world, China now faces chaos of an unprecedented scale since the Great Qing restored order to China two centuries ago—long-haired savages sweep through central China and Western nations exploit our markets with their gunboats. A great flood at the Yellow River has displaced many who live along its banks. Allan Lee Director of Logistics Yet, I have faith that these problems are fleeting and will be resolved swiftly. China endures; China has always endured, with the Mandate of Heaven surviving for thousands of years. Thus Katherine Zheng I entrust to you, my subjects, the fate of the Qing dynasty and China herself. Beijing readies USG General Assemblies itself for defence against imminent attack. I have faith in your ingenuity and ability to restore prosperity to the Empire.
    [Show full text]