Rapid Assessment Report on IDPS Settled in Gursum Woreda, Fafan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rapid Assessment Report On IDPS settled in Gursum Woreda, Fafan zone, Somali region December, 2017 1 Contents Acronyms………………………………………………………………………….3 Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………4 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....4 Objective of the assessment………………………………………………………...........4 Assessment Methodology……………………………………………………………......5 Profile of Assessed Sites………………………………………………………………....7 Ethical Consideration…………………………………………………………………….7 Limitations of the assessment………………………………………………………….....8 Findings…………………………………………………………………………………..8 Major Findings in Gursum town……………………………………………………….....8 Major Findings in Dhagahle……………………………………………………………..12 Findings in KubiJare…………………………………………………………………. …14 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….18 Recommendation…………………………………………………………………………19 2 I. Acronyms BOWCA Bureau of Women, and Children Affairs CFS Child Friendly Space DRC Danish Refugee Council CP Child protection DTM Displacement Tracking Matrix DPPB Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Bureau BOWCA Bureau of Women and Children Affairs GBV Gender Based Violence IDP Internally Displaced Person IOM International Organization for Migration KM Kilometer KII Key Informant Interview MAM Moderate Acute Malnutrition NFI Non Food Item NGO Non-Governmental Organization SAM Severe Acute Malnutrition SC Separated Children UAM Unaccompanied Minors WFS Women Friendly Space 3 II. Executive Summary The Ethiopia Somali National Regional State is hosting the largest IDP population in the country. The major causes of displacement are drought, conflict and flash floods. Most of the IDPs displaced in Somali region are internally displaced within the region, while 33 % are displaced from Oromia region and the remaining 1% are displaced from Afar region. According to round VII DTM report data from IOM, there are 683,221 IDPs in the region, while the population number being probably higher since DTM didn’t manage to cover all the sites in Somali region due to the security situation. From the total number around 281,472 (41 %) of the IDPS are displaced in Fafan and Liben Zones, where DRC is operational. In response to this huge crisis DRC has designed an intervention to enhance the safety, protection and access to appropriate essential services for the most vulnerable IDPs residing in Liben and Fafan zone. The purpose of this assessment is to identify operational sites in Fafan Zone, GursumWoreda and to determine the scale of the needs and protection risk for IDPs as well as to assess the potential/actual capacities to respond to the existing risks and needs within the communities and stakeholders. The assessment team (MPT, DPPB, BOWCA & WOWCA) has utilized key informant interviews, observation, structured interviews with women/girls, and structured interviews with IDP communities in order to get the required information from selected three sites(Gursum town, Dhagahle and Kubijare) of Gursum Woreda. The findings of the assessment revealed a snapshot of urgent protection issues and needs of the IDPs and also helped to create an evidence base to complement with information from other stakeholders (government, humanitarian organizations, etc.). They also point to where the main gaps are, and pave the way for sustainable responses. III. Introduction DRC’s Mobile protection team in Jijiga has undertaken site assessment of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Gursum woreda from November 29-1 December 2017, under the project, “Improving safety and access to services for IDPs in Somali region’’. The aim of this assessment report is to present the current protection concerns for IDP’s in Gursum Woreda and in particular the factors that increase their vulnerability as identified by the population themselves. IV. Objective of the assessment The main objective of this assessment is to determine the scale of the needs and protection risks for IDPs and to determine the potential/actual capacities to respond within the communities and stakeholders. The specific objectives are: 4 To enable DRC and partners to have a better understanding of the protection risks for IDPs, To identify appropriate responses to protection issues and concerns identified To provide recommendations for strengthening protection services for IDP’s. V. Assessment Methodology Primary data collection tools have been employed for the assessment. These include KII, semi structured interviews with women and girls, semi-structured interviews with displaced persons and site observation. The assessment was conducted jointly with DPPB, BOWCA and Woreda/Kebele Chair persons. The assessment team comprises of 3 MPT members, 1 person from DPPB and 1 person from WOWCA from Gursum Woreda. Assessment Tools Administered : 6 KI interviews conducted, 45 structured interviews with girls and women, 38structured interviews with IDP community (men and women) and 3 site observation checklists. Assessment Tools Administered 1% 10% Structured Interview with girls and women- Structured interview 48% with IDP community- KI- 41% Site Observation Report- 5 Structured Interviews with girls and women 33 12 WOMEN GIRLS Structured Interviews with IDP Communities 32 6 MEN WOMEN KII Respondents 4 2 MALE FEMALE Administered Tools The team had utilized the four tools in the selected sites of the Woreda. Site observation was conducted in each site. The other three tools were used accordingly: 6 Administered Tools Per site 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Bombas Dhagahle Kubi jaare Strucured Interview with 15 15 15 girls and women Strucurd Interview with IDP 13 10 15 Community KII 2 2 2 VI. Profile of Assessed Sites The team assessed three sites in Gursum woreda. These are Gursum town, Dhagahle, and Kubijare. The cause of the displacement in all three sites is conflict. The IDPs in Kubijare, Gursum town and Dhagahle are displaced within the host community. Profile of Assessed Site Gursum Dhagahle Kubi jaare # of HHs(IDP) 1200 675 515 # of Individuals(IDP) 7200 4050 3090 #HH(HC) 60 3000 655 # of Individuals(HC) 420 18000 3930 Distance from Jijiga( KM) 50 37 70 When did IDPs start to live in each site? Kubi jaare Dhagahle IDP IDP Name Bombas Mar-17 Apr-17 Jun-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Nov-17 Month/ Year VII. Ethical considerations Do no harm principle 7 Consideration was given to stigma arising from open discussion of sensitive issues. Confidentiality assured Purpose of the assessment and use of information shared Informed consent was secured by all participants. VIII. Limitation of the Assessment The security situation in Gursum woreda particularly in Kubijare site was volatile since it is located near the border of Oromia region. IX. Summary of Key Findings A. Findings in Gursum town Concerns among Children According to the KII, there are 20 separated children that are cared for by extended families and their clan but support is needed in terms of reunification with their family. These children are at high risk and they are not satisfied living with their extended family because they didn’t receive care and support like other children who are living with their biological parents and they always seems themselves as daily workers as the site chairman mention. Children from 13-15 years are exposed to environmental risks, mostly while searching for work. Children are travelling long distances more than 62 KM into Jijiga town to search for work. No recreational activities or psychosocial support are organized by communities for distressed children. Children show psychological distress and change in behavior due to inability to attend school. There is a school in Gursum town but the families can’t afford the school fees, the uniform and learning materials costs. Age distribution of SC 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Between 5 to 14 Older than 14 8 Sex of SC separated children according to gender More boys have been More girls than separated than boys are girsl separated 45% 55% The main causes of psychological distress among Children According to the KII, the major causes of psychological distress among children are : Un able toGoing far attend Loosing Lack of from their Lack of school food Lack of home for parents Cloth work shelter Concerns among Girls and Women Women and girls are exposed to domestic violence and mainly physical abuse, while in their houses. Due to lack of livelihood opportunities for women, men are expected to contribute to the family income. 9 What are the places where Women/girls feel unsafe? At home In the camp/out side of home On the way to water point On the way to market 13% 40% 13% 34% When women and girls feel unsafe where do they go to seek help? 6 5 5 5 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 Family/friend Religious Commmunity Kebele chief Police leader leader Services available for girls and women in Gursum town 4 3.5 Avaialble 3 2.5 2 1.5 Not avaialble 1 0.5 0 Avaialbel but not enough( every three months) Reporting and referral mechanisms for GBV 10 16 14 12 10 8 Yes 6 No 4 2 I don't know 0 unwilling to respond Are ther any Do you know Are you If GBV cases GBV incident where to aware of the reported , in your report SGBV refferal where there community case? mechanism? any measures taken? Concerns among the general IDP Population Access to Water and Sanitation The interview participants have stated they have access to portable water. The water point is accessible and near to them but there is a lack water storage materials. People aren’t getting sufficient amount of water due to lack of WASH NFI (Jeri-cans) for their household consumption but so far no AWD case was reported due these issues. Even though overcrowded there are latrines in the site Access to Health Care The interview participants stated there is no problem of accessing the health services. The health center is usually overcrowded by patients but the IDPs are getting treatment equally to the rest of the kebele community. Shelter Related Issues Most people in Gursum town are living in deteriorated tents. The sizes of the tents are very small and couldn’t accommodate one house hold (on average 5-6 individuals) and so far no shelter NFIs were distributed to IDPs.