Abazians (Abazins; Abaza; Apswa; Ashvy) Abricantes (Abricanti

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abazians (Abazins; Abaza; Apswa; Ashvy) Abricantes (Abricanti A 7 Abazians (Abazins; Abaza; Apswa; and 19th centuries the Russian SLAVS and TURKS competed for the region, and many Ashvy) ABAZIANS Abazians were relocated to Russia and Turkey. The Abazians are a Caucasic-speaking people, location: who live for the most part in the northwestern Many SLAVS settled in their homeland. The tra- ditional Abazian way of life, raising livestock North Caucasus in south- Caucasus region of southwestern Russia. The western Russia majority inhabit the foothills along the Big and (sheep, cattle, and horses, the latter for which Little Zelenchuk, Kuban, and Kuma Rivers in they were renowned) in the highlands and cul- time period: Second millennium B.C.E. the Karachay-Cherkessia Republic, but some tivating the lowlands (originally millet, then to present have settled in neighboring regions as well. maize), was disrupted. Their language is classified as part of the In the 20th century the Abazians came ancestry: North-West (Abkhazo-Adygheian) branch of under further pressure. During the civil war Caucasian that followed the Soviet rise to power, North Caucasic and closely related to the lan- language: Abazians fought for both the Red Guards and guage of the Abkhazians (Abkhaz; Absua), Abazin (Caucasic) most of whom live to the south in the Asian the White Guards. During the existence of the nation of Georgia. Abazin, as the language is Soviet Union (USSR), the Abazians faced fur- b known, is divided into two dialects correspon- ther deportations, collectivization, and the ding to two kinship communities, Tapanta and suppression of traditional customs and their Shkaraua. Islamic religion. Like the Abkhazians the Abazians are See also RUSSIANS: NATIONALITY. descended from proto-Abkhaz tribes, who, possibly as early as the second millennium B.C.E., inhabited lands near the Black Sea. By Abricantes (Abricanti; Abricantui) the ninth century C.E. they had separated into The Abricantes are classified as a Celtic tribe. the two distinct tribes, Tapanta and Shkaraua. They lived in Gaul around present-day In the 13th century the Tapanta moved south- Avranches in northwestern France and are dis- ward to the northern Caucasus, followed by cussed as CELTS or GAULS. The ROMANS referred the Shkaraua the next century, although some to them along with other tribes as Armoricans, of the Shkaraua were assimilated by that is, tribes living between the Seine and Abkhazians and other CAUCASIANS known as Loire on or near the Atlantic Ocean in the CIRCASSIANS. The Abazians reached their peak region of Armorica (roughly present-day of power in the 15th and 16th centuries but Brittany and eastern Normandy), occupied by were subject to the Kabardians, a subgroup of forces under Julius Caesar in 55 B.C.E. Legedia the Circassians in the 17th century. In the 18th on the site of Avranches became a capital of a 1 2 Abrincatui civitas (self-governed region) in Roman Gaul; before the time of the Trojan War. Various Avranches takes its name from the tribal name. groups of Indo-European speakers first ACHAEANS appeared in Greece perhaps as early as the location: fourth millennium B.C.E., long before this time. Southern Greece; Abrincatui See AMBIBARII. From at least 1600 B.C.E. peoples in southern Cycladic Islands; Cyprus; Greece were highly influenced by the MINOANS Asia Minor on Crete. By the end of the Greek Dark Ages, Abrodrites See OBODRITES. time period: from the demise of Mycenaean civilization to 12th century to 146 B.C.E. about the eighth century B.C.E., a people living ancestry: Achaeans (Achaioi) in a region called Achaea in the northern Hellenic The name Achaeans appears in the epic poem Peloponnese spoke a dialect, called Arcado- Cypriot, that resembled Mycenaean Greek language: the Iliad—presumably written by the poet more than any other in Greece. Achaean/Mycenaean Homer of the ninth or eighth century B.C.E.— (Greek); then perhaps in reference to one group of the GREEKS who other Greek dialects, were said to have sacked Troy, an event that ORIGINS such as Arcadian, may have occurred in 1184 B.C.E. or a century It is debated as to whether the Achaeans were Cypriot, and Attic earlier. Before archaeological discoveries of the the direct ancestors of the three main ethnic 20th century that dramatically realigned the divisions of the later Greeks, the AEOLIANS, b chronology of Greek prehistory, it was assumed IONIANS,and DORIANS, or whether these repre- the Achaeans were the first Hellenic people, sent the product of new Indo-European migra- that is, the first of the ancient Greeks who tions into Greece. After the mysterious collapse spoke Greek. It is now known that Indo- of the Mycenaean civilization in the 13th centu- European speakers of an early form of Greek ry B.C.E. there is a long dark period in Greece, had been in Greece for well over 1,000 years during which writing was lost, cities vanished, before the Trojan War. This period saw the rise, and civilization stagnated or went into retreat. In flowering, and collapse of an entire civilization, the Iliad by Homer from the ninth or eighth cen- of which Homer and later Greeks of the classi- tury B.C.E., based on oral histories dating from cal period knew very little—that of the these earlier Greek Dark Ages, the Achaeans are MYCENAEANS—that lasted for almost 400 years said to be the principal Greeks who sacked Troy (1600–1200 B.C.E.). Thus is makes little sense (Homer also mentions Argives—people from to apply the name Achaean to people much Argos—and Danaans as taking part). By the beginning of the Archaic period in 750 B.C.E., however, only a small group of Greeks on the Achaeans time line Peloponnese called themselves Achaeans; they lived in a small area of the northern B.C.E. Peloponnese, bordered on one side by high 12th century Movement of warrior groups with non-Mycenaean culture mountains and on the other by the Gulf of (possibly people later called Achaeans) across Aegean Sea and Greek Corinth. mainland in wake of collapse of Mycenaean civilization The origin of the Achaeans is clouded with uncertainty due to a lack of historical eighth century Greeks rise out of Dark Ages, begin to found city-states, redis- evidence from the Greek Dark Ages and the cover writing with Phoenician alphabet; Homeric poems mention Achaeans as principal Greeks. period before it and a relatively incomplete archaeological record (in part caused by the seventh century First Achaean League is founded in Achaea; Achaeans from unscientific, treasure-hunting style of 19th- Patras take part in a migration to Sicily; poems of Hesiod detail origin century excavators of Greek sites, particularly myth of Hellenes. those of the Mycenaeans). It has also been fourth century First Achaean League dissolves. somewhat controversial because of the associ- 336–335 Alexander the Great unites Greece by conquest. ation of the Hellenes with the roots of Western culture. For this reason the ancestors 280 Second Achaean League is founded to oppose Macedonian conquerors. of the Hellenes were avidly sought by schol- 247 Achaean League in strife with Sparta; Macedonians invited back to ars, on the assumption that the progenitors of help them; Macedonians regain control. so great a race as the Greeks, the first bearers 198 Achaean League sides with Rome against Macedonia; granted control of Western civilization, must be very special. of nearly all the Peloponnese. The early attempts to understand their origin 146 Romans conquer Achaea, making it a Roman province. resorted to interpreting the mythical story of the sons of Hellen, to whom Greece was Achaeans 3 parceled out as their inheritance, and who point in its history, but evidence for this before migrated with their people throughout historical times (when the CELTS invaded, for Greece, warring and allying among them- example)—when it happened and whence they selves, until they finally produced the ethnic might have come—is lacking at present. divisions found during the Archaic period. At that time these myths found their voice in the LANGUAGE Boeotian poet Hesiod, who probably lived in The Achaeans spoke perhaps the earliest form the eighth century B.C.E. of Greek, referred to as Achaean. It is thought These myths seemed to fit in well with to be related to Mycenaean. Later in their his- 19th-century linguistic analysis of the origins tory some among them probably spoke other of Greek as an Indo-European tongue. In this Greek dialects, depending on location, such as interpretation the Achaeans were a tall, fair- Arcado-Cypriot (Arcadian and Cypriot) and skinned people who migrated from central Attic. Europe and encountered a shorter dark- skinned Mediterranean people, related to the HISTORY Minoans of Crete. By a process of conquest, Around 1450 B.C.E. the Minoan civilization col- these people came to inhabit Greece sometime lapsed, and the Mycenaean civilization that had between 1600 and 1500 B.C.E. emerged on Greece during the Minoan New What archaeological evidence there is, Palace period (from 1600 B.C.E.) took over the however, combined with the presence of a large Minoan trading network in the Aegean and number of non-Indo-European place-names eastern Mediterranean. This civilization was and roots in Greek, indicates that intermixing, located primarily on the Peloponnese and and not conquest, was the rule. Moreover, other called Mycenaean after the city of Mycenae, analyses place the appearance of Indo-European which was excavated in the 19th century, pro- speakers in Greece much earlier, as far back as viding the first glimpses of the riches of this the fourth millennium B.C.E., and paint the pic- second Aegean civilization.
Recommended publications
  • Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study
    i Kretan cult and customs, especially in the Classical and Hellenistic periods: a religious, social, and political study Thesis submitted for degree of MPhil Carolyn Schofield University College London ii Declaration I, Carolyn Schofield, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been acknowledged in the thesis. iii Abstract Ancient Krete perceived itself, and was perceived from outside, as rather different from the rest of Greece, particularly with respect to religion, social structure, and laws. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the bases for these perceptions and their accuracy. Krete’s self-perception is examined in the light of the account of Diodoros Siculus (Book 5, 64-80, allegedly based on Kretan sources), backed up by inscriptions and archaeology, while outside perceptions are derived mainly from other literary sources, including, inter alia, Homer, Strabo, Plato and Aristotle, Herodotos and Polybios; in both cases making reference also to the fragments and testimonia of ancient historians of Krete. While the main cult-epithets of Zeus on Krete – Diktaios, associated with pre-Greek inhabitants of eastern Krete, Idatas, associated with Dorian settlers, and Kretagenes, the symbol of the Hellenistic koinon - are almost unique to the island, those of Apollo are not, but there is good reason to believe that both Delphinios and Pythios originated on Krete, and evidence too that the Eleusinian Mysteries and Orphic and Dionysiac rites had much in common with early Kretan practice. The early institutionalization of pederasty, and the abduction of boys described by Ephoros, are unique to Krete, but the latter is distinct from rites of initiation to manhood, which continued later on Krete than elsewhere, and were associated with different gods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 20 (2013): 57–76 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.13.004.1433 PTOLEMAIC FOUNDATIONS IN ASIA MINOR AND THE AEGEAN AS THE LAGIDS’ POLITICAL TOOL Tomasz Grabowski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków Abstract: The Ptolemaic colonisation in Asia Minor and the Aegean region was a signifi cant tool which served the politics of the dynasty that actively participated in the fi ght for hegemony over the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea basin. In order to specify the role which the settlements founded by the Lagids played in their politics, it is of considerable importance to establish as precise dating of the foundations as possible. It seems legitimate to acknowledge that Ptolemy II possessed a well-thought-out plan, which, apart from the purely strategic aspects of founding new settlements, was also heavily charged with the propaganda issues which were connected with the cult of Arsinoe II. Key words: Ptolemies, foundations, Asia Minor, Aegean. Settlement of new cities was a signifi cant tool used by the Hellenistic kings to achieve various goals: political and economic. The process of colonisation was begun by Alex- ander the Great, who settled several cities which were named Alexandrias after him. The process was successfully continued by the diadochs, and subsequently by the follow- ing rulers of the monarchies which emerged after the demise of Alexander’s state. The new settlements were established not only by the representatives of the most powerful dynasties: the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Antigonids, but also by the rulers of the smaller states. The kings of Pergamum of the Attalid dynasty were considerably active in this fi eld, but the rulers of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia were also successful in this process.1 Very few regions of the time remained beyond the colonisation activity of the Hellenistic kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxim M. KHOLOD1
    Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 26(2): 199–211 On the Ionian League in the Fourth Century BC Maxim M. KHOLOD1 Abstract. The author argues that the revival of the Ionian League, most likely dissolved by the Persians right after 494, happened ca. 373 BC. The sLeague seems to have been refounded then as a purely religious association. Its life was very long this time: the League most probably did not cease to exist not only during the rest of the 4th century BC but it was the same one which functioned almost interruptedly throughout further several centuries and disappeared only at a moment after the mid-3rd century AD. Rezumat. Autorul susține că renașterea Ligii Ionice, cel mai probabil dizolvată de perși imediat după 494, s-a produs aprocimativ în 373 î.H. Liga pare să fi fost reîntemeiată atunci ca o asociație pur religioasă. Existența sa a fost foarte îndelungată: Liga nu numai că nu a încetat cel mai probabil să existe pe parcursul secolului al IV-lea î.Hr., ci a funcționat aproape neîntrerupt în secolele care au urmat și a dispărut imediat după mijlocul secolului al III-lea d.Hr. Keywords: Ionian League, Panionion, Panionia, Persian Empire, Alexander the Great. The evidence for the Ionian League (also named the Panionian League) in the Classical period, after the suppression of the Ionian revolt by the Persians in 4942, is scarce. It is absolutely absent for the rest of the 5th century, a fact speaking, in all likelihood, that the League did not exist at this time3. Furthermore, it is significant that Herodotus describing the Panionion, a sacred place of the Ionians at Mycale in the territory of Priene, writes about a festival of the Ionian League in honour of Heliconian Poseidon held at this place, the Panionia, as if it is no longer celebrated in his time (I, 148)4.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76904-4 - Art in the Era of Alexander the Great: Paradigms of Manhood and their Cultural Traditions Ada Cohen Index More information INDEX Abdalonymus, 120, 122–123, 320n6. Aeschylus Alexander Romance, 14, 312n185 See also Alexander Agamemnon, 116 Alexander Sarcophagus, figs. 52–56 Sarcophagus Oresteia,4 analogy and program on, abduction, 51–55, 162, 301 Persians, 170, 172 119–129 abductor dressed as warrior, 175 Seven against Thebes, 181 description of, 119–120 death and, 9–10 Aesop, 4 ideology of, 123, 140 of male by female, 323n42 Agamemnon, 44, 52, 113, 116, 150, parallels to, 126–127 as metaphor for marriage, 207, 181 style and composition of, 120–123 216–217, 223, 229–230, 233, Agamemnon (Aeschylus), 116 Alexander the Great 332nn163–164. See also Agatharchus, 247, 336n43 Amazon connection, 60–61, 167 individual abductions; rape Agios Athanasios, tomb, 5, 28, 244, education of, 131 absolutism, link with rape, 301 262 gaze and, 40 absorption and theatrically, 38–39 Agora of Athens, relief bowls with hunt at Bazaira, 76, 263–264, Abu Ghraib prison, 173 abduction of Persephone, 210, 281–282 Abukir medallions, 23 figs. 98, 99 as lion, 114, 116 Acanthus, animal attacks on coins hunting scene, 263–264, fig. 119 as rider in lion vignette in Tomb II, from, 96, 108, 318n135 Agrigento, red-figure calyx krater, Vergina, 262–264 Achaean, 113–114 Coghill Painter, 219–220 Scythians and, 92 Achaemenid cylinder seal, 84, fig. 29 Agrigento Painter, Attic red-figure sexual restraint of, 166–168, 182, Achaemenid motif, in Attic art, 105 dinos, 274, fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divinity of Hellenistic Rulers
    OriginalverCORE öffentlichung in: A. Erskine (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World,Metadata, Oxford: Blackwell citation 2003, and similar papers at core.ac.uk ProvidedS. 431-445 by Propylaeum-DOK CHAPTKR TWENTY-FIVE The Divinity of Hellenistic Rulers Anßdos Chaniotis 1 Introduction: the Paradox of Mortal Divinity When King Demetrios Poliorketes returned to Athens from Kerkyra in 291, the Athenians welcomed him with a processional song, the text of which has long been recognized as one of the most interesting sources for Hellenistic ruler cult: How the greatest and dearest of the gods have come to the city! For the hour has brought together Demeter and Demetrios; she comes to celebrate the solemn mysteries of the Kore, while he is here füll of joy, as befits the god, fair and laughing. His appearance is majestic, his friends all around him and he in their midst, as though they were stars and he the sun. Hail son of the most powerful god Poseidon and Aphrodite. (Douris FGrH76 Fl3, cf. Demochares FGrH75 F2, both at Athen. 6.253b-f; trans. as Austin 35) Had only the first lines of this ritual song survived, the modern reader would notice the assimilaüon of the adventus of a mortal king with that of a divinity, the etymo- logical association of his name with that of Demeter, the parentage of mighty gods, and the external features of a divine ruler (joy, beauty, majesty). Very often scholars reach their conclusions about aspects of ancient mentality on the basis of a fragment; and very often - unavoidably - they conceive only a fragment of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverpage Final
    Symbols and Objects on the Sealings from Kedesh A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Paul Lesperance IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Professor Andrea Berlin August 2010 © Paul Lesperance, 2010 Acknowledgements I have benefitted greatly from the aid and support of many people and organizations during the writing of this dissertation. I would especially like to thank my advisor, Professor Andrea Berlin, for all her help and advice at all stages of the production process as well as for suggesting the topic to me in the first place. I would also like to thank all the members of my dissertation committee (Professor Susan Herbert of the University of Michigan, as well as Professors Philip Sellew and Nita Krevans of the University of Minnesota) for all their help and support. During the writing process, I benefitted greatly from a George A. Barton fellowship to the W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem in the fall of 2009. I would like to thank the fellowship committee for giving me such a wonderful and productive opportunity that helped me greatly in this endeavour as well as the staff of the Albright for their aid and support. I would also like to thank both Dr. Donald Ariel of the Israel Antiquities Authority for his aid in getting access to the material and his valuable advice in ways of looking at it and Peter Stone of the University of Cincinnati whose discussions on his work on the pottery from Kedesh helped to illuminate various curious aspects of my own.
    [Show full text]
  • Iver Nestos. According to Greek Mythology, the Foundation of the City
    (Avdira). A city in Thrace (northern Greece); situated on Cape ra (a corruption of the medieval Polystylon), eleven miles northeast of iver Nestos.According to Greek mythology, the foundation of the city went to Heracles,whose eighth labor was the capture of the man-eatinghorses iomedes,king of the neighboringBistonians. However, the first attempt to Abdera, accordingto Herodotus,was made in the seventhcentury nc by ists from Clazomenae(Klazumen) in Ionia led by Tynisias,but they were n backby the Thracians.In 545nc the peopleof anotherIonian city, Teos rk), frnding Persiandomination intolerable,placed settlers on the site (in- ing the poet Anacreon)and reconstructedthe town. It controlled an exten- 2pgs-6s6veredwith vineyards and fertile,' accordingto Pindar. An ear of in is shownon its fine coins.However, the Abderanswere constantly at pains protect their territory from Thracian incursions.Nevertheless, their city was a centerfor trading with the Thracian (Odrysian)rulers of the hinterland, d provided a harbor for the commerce of upper Thrace in general. \\'hen the Persians came to Thrace in 5131512they took control of Abdera, did so once againtn 492.In 480 it was one of the halting placesselected Xerxesas he marchedthe Persianarmy along the northern shoresof the Ae- n toward Greece. As a member of the first Athenian Alliance (Delian ue) establishedafter the end of the PersianWars, it contributed (from 454 a sum of betweenten and fifteen talents,indicating its position as the third- hestcity in the League.ln 431,at the beginningof the PeloponnesianWar inst Sparta, tltook the lead in an endeavor to enroll Thrace (under the Odry- ruler Sitalces)and Macedoniain the Athenian cause.Although'Abderite' becamea synonym for stupidity, Abdera producedtwo fifth-century think- of outstandingdistinction, Democritusand Protagoras.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Printing 600
    REVUE BELGE DE. NUMISMATIOUE ET DE SIGILLOGRAPHIE. PUBLU:.E. so~s LES A~SPICES nE LA snCIÉTÉ ROYALE nE NI,IM1SMAT lOUE AVEC LE CONCOURS DU GOUVERNEMENT DIRECTEURS: MM. MARCEL HOC, Dr JULES DESNEUX ET PAUL NASTER 1956 TOME CENT DEUXIÈME BRUXELLES 5, RUE DU MUSÉE 1956 KûINON Ir II()AEQN A Study of the Coinage of the ~ Ionian League)) (*) The coins which specifically refer to the thirteen cities of the Ionian Federation, KOINON 1r no/\ EON, bear the portraits of three emperors: Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelîus and Commodus, It is this series to which this article is devoted. There are two later issues of coins from the City of Colophon during the reigns ,ofTrebonianus Gallus and Valerian which have lîttle direct con- ....... ,,' :neèthm with the Ionian Federation as such. An example of the \\~.~~m.~p~~~:~;:d.P::~~;:~:~::~~i~eW;:~~ieD~ :>\Ve:are::d~ePiYlndebted: ACI{NOWLEDGEMENTS To the fpllowingfor valuable suggestions and assistance in ohtainlng material for thtsartfcle: Colin M~ Ki"aay, Ashmolean Museum, Oxford. Dr. T. O. Mahbott, Hunter College, New York. Sydney P. Noe, American Nunùsmatic Society, New York. Dr. David Magie) Princeton University. Edward Gans, Berkeley, California. H. Von Aulock, Istanbul. To the following for furnishing casts and photographs and assistance in procuring them: Dr. Karl Pink and Dr. Eduard Holzmair, National Collection, Vienna. Dr. W. Schneewind, Historlcal Museum, Basel. Miss Anne S. Robertson, Hunterian Museum, University of Glasgow. M. Jean Babelon, Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris. P. K. .Ienkins, British Museum, London. Dr. G. Erxleben, National Museum, Berlin. Sr. Gian Guido Belloni, Sforza Museum, Milan. And to tlle following dealers for their generons cooperation: 32 .r.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced – Preliminary Round 1 Th 1
    Yale Certamen 2019 Written by Samir Al-Ali, Nestoras Apodiakos, Margot Armbruster, Aspen Bombardo, Skylar Cobbett, Andres Cook, Ram Gollapudy, Noah Harris, Connor Harrison, Michael Howard, Minyoung Hwang, David Jackson, David Jaffe, Lina Kapp, Michael Kearney, John Kim, Carina Layfield, Joshua Lomasney, Mindren Lu, Noah McThenia, Gabriel Molina, Ali Murray, Matt Nelson, Ben Ream, Henry Schott, Jason Tan, Matthew Thomas, and Jonathan Yuan. Edited by Michael Kearney. Advanced – Preliminary Round 1 th 1. Welcome to the 9 ​ annual Yale Certamen! Translate the following sentence into Latin: ​ We hope that you will enjoy this competition! SPĒRĀMUS VŌS/TĒ HŌC CERTĀMINE FRUCTŪRŌS/-ĀS/-UM/-AM ESSE! or SPĒRĀMUS FORE UT HŌC CERTĀMINE FRUĀMINĪ! ​ B1: Bene factum! Now translate this sentence into Latin: We encourage you to use both ​ ​ knowledge and speed. HORTĀMUR (VŌS/TĒ) (UT) SCIENTIĀQUE CELERITĀTEQUE ŪTĀMINĪ/ŪTĀRIS or ET SCIENTIĀ ET CELERITĀTE ​ ​ B2: Finally, using potior , say in Latin: If you play well, you will obtain a wonderful ​ ​ reward. SĪ BENE LUDĒS/LUDĒTIS/LŪSERIS/LŪSERITIS, PRAEMIŌ MĪRĀBILĪ/MĪRŌ/MĪRANDŌ POTIĒMINĪ/POTIĒRIS (or PRAEMIĪ MĪRĀBILIS/MĪRĪ/MĪRANDĪ) ​ ​ 2. Zeus Katachthonios was an epithet of what god, who snatched up Persephone as she was picking flowers and carried her down to the Underworld? adHADES B1: What epithet of Hades meant “The Unseen One”? AÏDONEUS B2: At what lake near Naples did Aeneas enter the Underworld? AVERNUS 3. Which of the following verbs, if any, has a reduplicated third principal part: cēdō, pergō, ​ pellō, stertō? PELLŌ B1: Define the verb pellō and provide all principal parts. ​ ​ PELLŌ, PELLERE, PEPULĪ, PULSUS / PULSUM = (TO / I) BEAT / DRIVE ​ B2: Define the verb pergō and provide all principal parts.
    [Show full text]