DOCSLIB.ORG

Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report Issued for Use Prepared for: Hamlet of Tulita Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 4910 – 53rd Street Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P4 Project Number: 144930036 December 23, 2016 Revision Date Notes 0 2016 Dec 23 Submitted to SLWB for approval Sign-off Sheet This document entitled Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Hamlet of Tulita (the “Client”). The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Prepared by (signature) Jamie Davignon, EIT Reviewed by (signature) Walter Orr, P.Eng Approved by (signature) Erica Bonhomme, P.Geo Sign-off Sheet Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 1 2.0 TULITA POPULATION PROJECTION ................................................................................ 1 3.0 SOLID WASTE FACILITY CAPACITY ................................................................................ 1 3.1 SOLID WASTE FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 1 3.2 PROJECTED LIFESPAN OF CURRENT SWF ........................................................................ 1 3.3 FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OF SWF ..................................................................................... 1 4.0 SEWAGE LAGOON CAPACITY ...................................................................................... 3 4.1 SEWAGE LAGOON DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 3 4.2 PROJECTED CAPACITY OF SEWAGE LAGOON ............................................................. 3 4.3 FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY OF SEWAGE LAGOON ........................................................... 4 4.3.1 Sewage Flows and Future Requirements .................................................... 4 4.3.2 Sludge Accumulation and Future Requirements ....................................... 4 5.0 NEW SOLID WASTE FACILITY ACTION PLAN ................................................................. 5 5.1 TIMELINES FOR PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ......................................... 5 5.2 PLANNING .......................................................................................................................... 5 5.3 DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 6 5.4 PERMITTING / REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 6 5.5 SITE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................... 6 5.6 CAPACITY AND AREA REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 9 5.7 SITING CRITERIA ................................................................................................................. 9 5.8 EARTH MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................... 11 5.9 CLIMATE CHANGE .......................................................................................................... 11 6.0 TIMELINES ..................................................................................................................... 13 7.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................7.1 i TULITA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES REPORT Introduction December 23, 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND Water License S16L3-001 Part E, Item 2 requires that the Hamlet submit a Waste Disposal Facilities Report. The Waste Disposal Facilities Report is to determine the functional capacity and projected lifespan of the current Waste Disposal Facilities, and contain an action plan for the establishment of new Facilities, that includes timelines for planning, design and construction and identifies the triggers that will prompt the planning and construction of the new Facilities. This document fulfills the requirements of the Waste Disposal Facilities Report for the Hamlet. 1.2 SETTING The Hamlet of Tulita (Hamlet) is located in the Sahtu region of the Northwest Territories at the confluence of the Great Bear and Mackenzie Rivers (64º54’N, 125º34’W). The closest Environmental Canada meteorological station (Station 2202800) is in Norman Wells, approximately 75 km northwest of Tulita (Government of Canada, 2016). Based on the meteorological data, the average precipitation in the area is 294.4 mm including 171.7 mm of rain and 161.5 cm of snow. The average temperature for January is -26.1ºC and July is 17.1ºC (Government of Canada, 2016). In 2015, the population of the Hamlet of Tulita was estimated at 516 residents representing less than two percent of the population of the Northwest Territories. The population growth of the Hamlet was estimated at 0.2% for the past 11 years (Government of the Northwest Territories, 2015). The Hamlet operates two waste disposal facilities: • Solid Waste Facility (SWF) • Sewage Lagoon The SWF is located approximately 2.2 km northeast of the community and the Sewage Lagoon is located within Taylor Lake, approximately 500 m north of the SWF (Figure 1). 1.3 GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION Tulita is located within the Norman Range Low Subarctic Ecoregion. The geology of this ecoregion consists of dolomite and limestone bedrock overlain by fine to medium textured tills. Brunisolic and Luvisolic soils are most common in the Tulita area. Vegetation is dominated by trembling aspen, paper birch and spruce (white and black). Moist areas have dwarf black spruce, Labrador tea, ericaceous shrubs, and mosses (Ecological Stratification Working Group Solid Waste Facilities Report 1 TULITA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES REPORT Introduction December 23, 2016 1995). The ground condition at the Solid Waste Facility (SWF) and Sewage Lagoon location is extensive discontinuous permafrost. In the first 10 to 20 meters below the ground surface, 50 to 90% of the ground contains a volume of approximately 15% ice (Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), 2016). Solid Waste Facilities Report 2 TULITA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES REPORT Introduction December 23, 2016 Figure 1: Location of Waste Disposal Facilities Hamlet of Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report 1 TULITA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES REPORT Tulita Population Projection December 23, 2016 2.0 TULITA POPULATION PROJECTION Historical and predicted population values were obtained from the NWT Bureau of Statistics. In 2015, the population of the Hamlet of Tulita was estimated at 516 residents representing less than two percent of the population of the Northwest Territories (GNWT, 2016). The population growth of the Hamlet was estimated at 0.2 % for the past 11 years. Any upgrades to the solid waste management system are to be designed for a 40-year planning horizon. Population projections were available up to 2031, and values were extrapolated from this data and used to estimate the population up to 2054, as illustrated in Figure 2. Tulita Population 700 y = 1.96x - 3389 600 R² = 0.9772 500 400 Population History 300 Population Population Projection 200 Linear (Population Projection) 100 0 2001 2011 2021 2031 2041 2051 Year Figure 1 Population History and Projections Though the population of Tulita has been increasing, it is currently lower than projected, such that the GNWT Bureau of Statistics’ projection of 637 in 2054 may overestimate the population growth. Solid Waste Facilities Report 1 TULITA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES REPORT Solid Waste Facility Capacity December 23, 2016 3.0 SOLID WASTE FACILITY CAPACITY 3.1 SOLID WASTE FACILITY DESCRIPTION The Hamlet’s SWF is located approximately 2 km northeast of the community center. The SWF was commissioned in 1983 and has been in use since that time. The SWF accepts hazardous waste, active and inactive household domestic waste, vehicles and and bulky wastes (i.e., vehicles, fuel tanks, other waste metal) (Figure 3). Except for a recycling program for aluminum beverage containers, the Hamlet of Tulita does not employ any waste diversion. The SWF does not have an engineered containment system, except for a portion of the Hazardous Waste Area. Drainage ditches are located along the east and west sides of the access road to the SWF. In addition, site perimeter ditching is present, draining towards the south. The SWF was designed as a modified landfill operated based the cell disposal method, with a new cell being added each year (Dillon Consulting Limited, 2005). In this method, wastes are deposited into cells which are excavated during the summer months. The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 16, 2020
    TD 187-19(2) TABLED ON OCTOBER 19, 2020 October 16, 2020 MS. LESA SEMMLER MLA, INUVIK TWIN LAKES OQ 274-19(2) Support for Residents Impacted by Flooding This letter is in follow up to the Oral Question you raised on June 2, 2020, regarding support for residents impacted by flooding in the Beaufort Delta. I committed to providing an update on the resources available for residents of the Northwest Territories (NWT) in dealing with floods. In the NWT, flood risk is considered to be one of the most destructive natural hazards, second to wildfires. There are nine communities considered flood risk areas; including Hay River, Fort Simpson, Fort Liard, Nahanni Butte, Tulita, Fort Good Hope, Fort McPherson, Aklavik, and Tuktoyaktuk. As part of its mandate, Municipal and Community Affairs (MACA), through the Emergency Management Organization (EMO), works with communities to mitigate, prepare for, respond to and recover from emergencies including flooding events. Starting in April each year, the EMO monitors seasonal breakup and high-water conditions across the territory and advises communities of high-risk conditions. MACA Regional staff work with flood risk communities to ensure community awareness and the updating of emergency plans to support community preparedness activities. When flood situations occur, the local emergency plan is enacted, and the EMO activates the community’s NWT Emergency Plan, at the level required to provide the support and resources required. Should the event cause wide spread damage to a community, the Government of the Northwest Territories’ (GNWT) Disaster Assistance Policy may apply to assist the recovery of residents, businesses and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants and Contributions
    TABLED DOCUMENT 287-18(3) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2017 – 2018 Subventions et Contributions Le present document contient la traduction française du résumé et du message du ministre Rapport 2017 – 2018 October 2018 | Octobre 2018 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree Tłı̨chǫ yatı k’ę̀ę̀. Dı wegodı newǫ dè, gots’o gonede. Tłı̨chǫ Ɂerıhtł’ıś Dëne Sųłıné yatı t’a huts’elkër xa beyáyatı theɂą ɂat’e, nuwe ts’ën yółtı. Chipewyan Edı gondı dehgáh got’ı̨e zhatıé k’ę́ę́ edatł’éh enahddhę nıde naxets’ę́ edahłı.́ South Slavey K’áhshó got’ı̨ne xǝdǝ k’é hederı ɂedı̨htl’é yerınıwę nı ́dé dúle. North Slavey Jii gwandak izhii ginjìk vat’atr’ijąhch’uu zhit yinohthan jì’, diits’àt ginohkhìi. Gwich’in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Indigenous Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ............................................................. i MESSAGE DU MINISTRE .......................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mackenzie Highway Extension, for Structuring EIA Related Field Investigations and for Comparative Assessment of Alternate Routes
    D. Mackenzie Valley Highway Extension D.1 Consultations An initial Stakeholder Workshop was held in Norman Wells on June 8, 1998. The workshop was attended by approximately 60 stakeholders and generated considerable discussion on the need-for, and benefits-of, an all-weather road. A meeting with the Sahtu Secretariat and the Sahtu Regional Land Corporation Presidents was held on November 12, 1998. The group reviewed the Terms of Reference for Environmental Scoping and Benefit Cost Studies. The Terms of Reference were also sent to other stakeholders invited to participate on the Advisory Committee. In December the Department established an Advisory Committee for this project consisting of 25 individuals representing a wide variety of interest groups and organizations. The Department has kept this committee informed of the status of projects, and held a meeting on March 17, 1999 in Norman Wells. A list of the committee members is provided below. C Sahtu Secretariat Incorporated, Ruby McDonald, C Deline Land Corporation, Raymond Taniton, C Fort Good Hope Metis Nation Local #54 Land Corporation, Wilfred McNeely Jr., C Ayoni Keh Land Corporation (Colville Lake), Wilbert Kochon, C Yamoga Land Corporation (Fort Good Hope), John Louison, C Tulita Land and Tulita District Land Corporation, Gordon Yakeleya, C Fort Norman Metis Local #60 Land Corporation, Eddie McPherson Jr., C Ernie McDonald Land Corporation (Norman Wells), Winter Lennie, C Gwich=in Tribal Council, Richard Nerysoo, C Town of Inuvik, George Roach, C Charter Community of Arctic Red
    [Show full text]
  • Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim
    Annual Report of the Implementation Committee April 1, 2000–March 31, 2001 Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement 2001 Annual Report Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2001 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca QS-5354-021-BB-A1 Catalogue No. R31-10/2001 ISBN 0-662-66189-3 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada foreword The Implementation Committee is pleased to provide its annual report describes achievements and developments seventh annual report on the implementation of the Sahtu during the year. Information is contributed by various federal Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement. The and territorial departments, the SSI and other bodies estab- report covers the fiscal year from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. lished under the Agreement. The Implementation Committee comprises a senior official from We are committed to strengthening the partnerships that are each of the parties: the Sahtu Secretariat Incorporated (SSI), key to the successful implementation of this Agreement. Our the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) and achievements to date are the product of partners working the Government of Canada. It functions by consensus and together to recognize Aboriginal rights in an atmosphere of serves as a forum where parties can raise issues and voice mutual respect, and the commitment of the parties to fulfil obli- their concerns. gations pursuant to this Agreement. The role of the Implementation Committee is to oversee, direct and monitor implementation of the Agreement. This John Tutcho Mark Warren Aideen Nabigon Sahtu Secretariat Government of the Government of Incorporated Northwest Territories Canada 2000–2001 Annual Report | i table of contents Foreword .
    [Show full text]
  • Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical
    CIMFP Exhibit P-02332 Page 1 Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical Brian has over 40 years of specialized experience in mechanical engineering with over 25 years of working in Northern Canada. He has designed mechanical systems for apartments, hospitals, labs, offices, schools, warehouses, office buildings and apartments throughout Yukon, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. Brian’s experience includes high and low pressure steam systems; central plants; piping stress analysis; direct bury and utilidor type distribution systems; plumbing systems; medical gas systems; fire protection systems; heating systems using radiant ceiling panel, perimeter radiation and slab heating system; site storm, sanitary and water services; water treatment and waste treatment facilities; ventilation and cooling systems of all types; dust collection and exhaust systems; EDUCATION fully computerized DDC controls, pneumatic and electric controls. He has worked Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering with Distinction, 1974 on a number of refrigeration systems from liquid ammonia beer cooling systems in University of Saskatchewan a brewery to brine/ammonia systems for hockey and curling arenas. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Except for Yellowknife, Hay River, Inuvik and Norman Wells almost all projects in AFFILIATIONS the North include some work on a fuel system for the buildilng. Brian has worked NAPEG, Former President, Life on fuel systems across the Arctic from small single tank systems feeding housing Member through to tank farms and dispensing systems serving communiteis and mine ASHRAE Life Member APEGS Life Member sites. APEY ACEC-NWT, Former President RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE PROGESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP AIRPORT FACILITIES NAPEG P.Eng. 1407 CERTIFICATIONS Combined Services Building; Yellowknife, NT Fundamentals of Infection Control Senior Mechanical Engineer for this design & field services project for the vehicle during Construction, Renovation or maintenance building at the YK Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1: Overview and Impact Summary
    Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Overview and Impact Summary Submitted to: National Energy Board and the Joint Review Panel Submitted by: Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited IPRCC.PR.2004.07 August 2004 Cover photograph courtesy of the Government of the Northwest Territories EIS FOR MACKENZIE GAS PROJECT VOLUME 1: OVERVIEW AND IMPACT SUMMARY CONTENTS Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Overview and Purpose ....................................................1-1 1.1.1 Background ......................................................................1-1 1.1.2 Environmental Impact Statement ....................................1-1 1.1.3 Project Purpose and Need ................................................1-2 1.1.4 Project Overview .............................................................1-2 1.1.5 Project Alternatives .........................................................1-3 1.2 Proponent Ownership ..................................................................1-7 1.2.1 Commercial Agreements .................................................1-7 1.3 Project Schedule ..........................................................................1-7 1.3.1 Regulatory Review and Approvals ..................................1-7 1.3.2 Project Phases ..................................................................1-8 1.4 Major Project Components ..........................................................1-9
    [Show full text]
  • Central Mackenzie Surface Water and Groundwater Baseline Assessment
    May 21, 2015 Central Mackenzie Surface Water and Groundwater Baseline Assessment REPORT 2: PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Submitted to: Bruce Hanna Regional Science Coordinator Government of the Northwest Territories 867-920-6520 [email protected] Report Number: 1401835 Final Report 2 Distribution: REPORT GNWT - 5 copies Golder - 1 copy CENTRAL MACKENZIE SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER BASELINE ASSESSMENT - PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.1 Surface Water Quantity (Hydrology) .................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Line 21 Little Smith Creek Maintenance Project Application
    Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc. Little Smith Creek Maintenance Project (KP 158) Line 21 Little Smith Creek Maintenance Project Application Indigenous and Stakeholder Engagement Enbridge has engaged with local Indigenous groups and stakeholders regarding the proposed work for the Line 21 Little Smith Creek Maintenance Project (“the Project”) for more than a year. Enbridge has been providing these groups with information with the goal of initiating early and ongoing dialogue and listening and responding to any interests and concerns regarding the Project in a timely manner. Ongoing discussions have been tailored to the specific interests of each group with a strong focus on creating opportunities for local participation in the Project. A detailed summary of the engagement program is provided as Schedule A. Engagement Objectives Enbridge is committed to creating processes that support meaningful engagement with potentially affected parties. Enbridge works to build an understanding of Project related interests, ensure regulatory requirements are met, mitigate or avoid Project effects, and provide mutually beneficial opportunities. The objectives for undertaking engagement for the Project include the following: • Ensure the procedural aspects of the duty to consult that are delegated to Enbridge are met and all regulatory requirements for consultation and engagement have been achieved. • Build and maintain positive long-term relationships with Indigenous and local communities. • Ensure consultation and engagement activities for the Project are coordinated and aligned with other regional community engagement activities. • Ensure consultation and engagement activities contribute to and align with Enbridge’s Regional Engagement Plan and Indigenous Engagement Policy http://www.enbridge.com/about- us/indigenous-communities/indigenous-peoples-policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together to Create Nááts'ihch'oh National Park
    PROPOSED CREATION OF NÁÁTS’IHCH’OH NATIONAL PARK RESERVE Sahtu Community Update #1 Februar y 200 9 WORKING TOGETHER TO CREATE NÁÁTS’IHCH’OH NATIONAL PARK RESERVE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS THE STORY SO FAR... 1. Why are the Nahanni Headwaters Important? For countless generations, the South Nahanni River headwaters area, in the southwest corner of the Sahtu Settlement Area, has been an In addition to its importance to the Dene and Métis of the important traditional area for the Shuhtagot’ine (Mountain) Dene. Sahtu and Dehcho, the South Nahanni River watershed is Today, its importance extends to the Dene and Métis of Tulita and an incredibly beautiful and ecologically important area for Norman Wells. Canada and indeed the world. On June 15, 2007, Parks Canada requested the support of the three The upper part of the watershed within the Sahtu Settlement land corporations that represent the Dene and Métis living in Tulita area accounts for about 1/6th of the Greater Nahanni and Norman Wells for the creation of a national park reserve in this Ecosystem, and it is important as the source of the river area. and as habitat for grizzly bear, Dall’s sheep and woodland caribou and many other important wildlife and plant species. On October 25, 2007, the Tulita Land Corporation, the Fort Norman Métis Land Corporation, the Norman Wells Land Corporation and the The headwaters area is the launching area for adventurous Tulita District Land Corporation unanimously passed a resolution to visitors to the wilderness. Visitors from the rest of Canada support an interim land withdrawal for the possible creation of a new, and the world will have the opportunity to see the spectacular stand-alone national park reserve in the South Nahanni headwaters landscapes and to hike, canoe, and climb in these new park area.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Court Circuits – 2021 Page 1
    TERRITORIAL COURT CIRCUITS – 2021 PAGE 1 Week YELLOWKNIFE – YELLOWKNIFE - BEAUFORT DELTA SAHTU REGION, HAY RIVER, DEHCHO HOLIDAYS/OTHER Mon-Fri 1ST 2ND REGION TŁĮCHǪ REGION & & (Courtroom #202) (Courtroom #101) ŁUTSELK'E SOUTH OF THE LAKE YK * Mandatory Leave (23rd-24th) December *Christmas (25th) Stat 2020 Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only *Boxing Day (26th) Stat 21 – 25* YK *Boxing Day Stat (28th) Dec 28 – *Mandatory Leave (29th - 31st) Jan 1, Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only Urgent Matters Only *New Year’s Day (1st) Stat 2021* YK 4 – 8 Wellness/DVTO (7th) YK YK 2nd 11 – 15 13th, 14th, 15th YK Inuvik (19th, 20th+) Délįne (18th) Fort Smith (18th-20th) No Out-of-Custody Docket on Jan. Fort McPherson (21st, Tulita (19th) 19, 2021 18 – 22 Wellness/DVTO (21st) 22nd) Fort Good Hope (20th) Remote Circuit Norman Wells (21st) Held by Teleconference YK YK 2nd Inuvik (26th, 27th+) Behchoko (26th-29th+) Tuktoyaktuk (28th, 29th) 25 – 29 27th, 28th, 29th * indicates short week. ** see HOLIDAYS/OTHER column for further information. SCHEDULE UPDATED: September 21, 2021 PUBLIC - 2021 TERRITORIAL COURT CIRCUITS – 2021 PAGE 2 Week YELLOWKNIFE – YELLOWKNIFE - BEAUFORT DELTA SAHTU REGION, HAY RIVER, DEHCHO HOLIDAYS/OTHER Mon-Fri 1ST 2ND REGION TŁĮCHǪ REGION & & (Courtroom #202) (Courtroom #101) ŁUTSELK'E SOUTH OF THE LAKE YK Inuvik (2nd-5th) Whatì (2nd) Hay River (1st, 2nd) No Out-of-Custody Docket on Feb. 2, February Łutselk’e (3rd) DVTO (1st) 2021 1 - 5 Wellness/DVTO (4th) C.P. Hearing YK YK 2nd Inuvik (9th-12th) Hay River (8th, 9th) DVTO (8th) 8 – 12 10th, 11th, 12th C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • MTS Cargo Rates
    Marine Transportation Services 2021 Cargo Rates General Cargo Ship to Hay River Lutsel K'e Tulita Norman Wells Fort Good Hope Inuvik Aklavik Tuktoyaktuk Sachs Harbour Paulatuk Ulukhaktok Kugluktuk Hay River $356 $287 $287 $344 $411 $435 $462 $524 $524 $524 $551 Lutsel K'e $231 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tulita $187 N/A $124 $181 $248 $272 $299 $438 $438 $438 $456 Norman Wells $187 N/A $81 $181 $248 $272 $299 $438 $438 $438 $456 Fort Good Hope $187 N/A $117 $117 $191 $217 $243 $426 $426 $426 $445 Inuvik $268 N/A $161 $161 $124 $182 $119 $398 $398 $398 $417 Aklavik $284 N/A $177 $177 $141 $119 $150 $420 $420 $420 $438 Tuktoyaktuk $300 N/A $195 $195 $158 $77 $99 $319 $319 $319 $333 Sachs Harbour $341 N/A $285 $285 $277 $259 $272 $206 Call Call Call Paulatuk $341 N/A $285 $285 $277 $259 $272 $206 Call Call Call Ulukhaktok $341 N/A $285 $285 $277 $259 $272 $206 Call Call Call Ship From Ship Kugluktuk $359 N/A $298 $298 $289 $271 $285 $217 Call Call Call 1. Rates presented are in metric: One revenue tonne will apply per metric tonne (1000 kilograms) of gross weight OR per 2.5 cubic meters which ever produces the highest revenue per piece. 2. All shipments are subject to a minimum charge equal to 0.5 revenue ton at the above applicable rates. 3. The extreme overall dimensions (length, width and height) of each piece shall be utilized to determine the volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Pop and Dwelling Co#3BBAEE
    February 8, 2012 2011 Census Population and Dwelling Counts Statistics Canada has released the population and dwelling counts from the 2011 Census of Canada. In the Northwest Territories, the census took place last February for early enumeration areas and in May 2011 for regular enumeration areas. The national census is conducted every five years to provide a portrait of Canada and its people. This report presents the first in a series of data releases based on the 2011 census. The population count of the Northwest Territories was 41,462 persons at the time of the 2011 census, virtually no change from the 2006 count. Results indicate that the count of occupied private dwellings in the Northwest Territories was 14,700 in 2011, an increase of 3.3% since 2006. For Canada, the population count increased by 5.9%, while the occupied private dwelling count rose by 7.1% between the 2006 and 2011 censuses. Yukon had the largest percentage increase in both the population and dwelling counts, followed by Alberta. All other provinces and territories also showed an increase in the population and dwelling counts since the last census. Table 1 Census Population and Occupied Private Dwelling Counts, by Province and Territory Census Years, 2006 and 2011 ------------- Population Counts ------------ ---- Occupied Private Dwellings ---- 2011 2006 Percent 2011 2006 Percent Census Census Change Census Census Change Canada 33,476,688 31,612,897 5.9 13,320,614 12,435,520 7.1 Northwest Territories 41,462 41,464 0.0 14,700 14,224 3.3 Nunavut 31,906 29,474 8.3
    [Show full text]