May 20, 2021 Public Safety Notice GNWT's Response to Flooding In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
October 16, 2020
TD 187-19(2) TABLED ON OCTOBER 19, 2020 October 16, 2020 MS. LESA SEMMLER MLA, INUVIK TWIN LAKES OQ 274-19(2) Support for Residents Impacted by Flooding This letter is in follow up to the Oral Question you raised on June 2, 2020, regarding support for residents impacted by flooding in the Beaufort Delta. I committed to providing an update on the resources available for residents of the Northwest Territories (NWT) in dealing with floods. In the NWT, flood risk is considered to be one of the most destructive natural hazards, second to wildfires. There are nine communities considered flood risk areas; including Hay River, Fort Simpson, Fort Liard, Nahanni Butte, Tulita, Fort Good Hope, Fort McPherson, Aklavik, and Tuktoyaktuk. As part of its mandate, Municipal and Community Affairs (MACA), through the Emergency Management Organization (EMO), works with communities to mitigate, prepare for, respond to and recover from emergencies including flooding events. Starting in April each year, the EMO monitors seasonal breakup and high-water conditions across the territory and advises communities of high-risk conditions. MACA Regional staff work with flood risk communities to ensure community awareness and the updating of emergency plans to support community preparedness activities. When flood situations occur, the local emergency plan is enacted, and the EMO activates the community’s NWT Emergency Plan, at the level required to provide the support and resources required. Should the event cause wide spread damage to a community, the Government of the Northwest Territories’ (GNWT) Disaster Assistance Policy may apply to assist the recovery of residents, businesses and the community. -
Small Community Youth Employment Support Brochure
We are Contact Us Youth Employment - Here to Help Regional ECE Service Centres: Small Community How do you apply? Fort Simpson (867) 695-7338 Dehcho Regional Education Centre Employment Support Contact your regional ECE Service Centre Developing workplace skills for more information. Fort Smith (867) 872-7425 Sweetgrass Building The Small Community Employment Support program provides wage subsidies to organizations in small NWT Hay River (867) 874-5050 communities who offer training in the workplace Courthouse Building to unemployed youth. Inuvik (867) 777-7365 GNWT Multi-use Building Norman Wells (867) 587-7157 Edward G. Hodgson Building Yellowknife (867) 766-5100 Nova Plaza www.ece.gov.nt.ca If you would like this information in another official language, call us. Am I Eligible? Eligible Communities Financial Assistance Employers must be: Only organizations in the following communities Wage subsidies are available for a 4 – 40 week • Licensed to operate in the Northwest Territories are eligible to apply for funding: employment period. • Located in an eligible community • Aklavik • Kakisa Wage subsidies are available only for fulltime positions (minimum of 30 hours per week). • In operation for at least 6 months • Colville Lake • Łutselk’e • Délįne • Nahanni Butte Wage subsidies apply only to regular hours worked by the • In good standing with the Workers’ Safety and trainee. All overtime, vacation, statutory holidays, sick and Compensation Commission • Dettah • Paulatuk special leave is the responsibility of the employer. • One of the following: • Enterprise • Sachs Harbour Employers must contribute a minimum of 20% of the trainee’s • Business or Corporation • Fort Good Hope • Trout Lake wage and pay at least minimum wage, including other benefits • Aboriginal Government or Organization • Fort Liard • Tsiigehtchic and dues found in the Employment Standards Act. -
Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report
Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report Issued for Use Prepared for: Hamlet of Tulita Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 4910 – 53rd Street Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P4 Project Number: 144930036 December 23, 2016 Revision Date Notes 0 2016 Dec 23 Submitted to SLWB for approval Sign-off Sheet This document entitled Tulita Solid Waste Facilities Report was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Hamlet of Tulita (the “Client”). The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Prepared by (signature) Jamie Davignon, EIT Reviewed by (signature) Walter Orr, P.Eng Approved by (signature) Erica Bonhomme, P.Geo Sign-off Sheet Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 -
Grants and Contributions
TABLED DOCUMENT 287-18(3) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2017 – 2018 Subventions et Contributions Le present document contient la traduction française du résumé et du message du ministre Rapport 2017 – 2018 October 2018 | Octobre 2018 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree Tłı̨chǫ yatı k’ę̀ę̀. Dı wegodı newǫ dè, gots’o gonede. Tłı̨chǫ Ɂerıhtł’ıś Dëne Sųłıné yatı t’a huts’elkër xa beyáyatı theɂą ɂat’e, nuwe ts’ën yółtı. Chipewyan Edı gondı dehgáh got’ı̨e zhatıé k’ę́ę́ edatł’éh enahddhę nıde naxets’ę́ edahłı.́ South Slavey K’áhshó got’ı̨ne xǝdǝ k’é hederı ɂedı̨htl’é yerınıwę nı ́dé dúle. North Slavey Jii gwandak izhii ginjìk vat’atr’ijąhch’uu zhit yinohthan jì’, diits’àt ginohkhìi. Gwich’in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Indigenous Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ............................................................. i MESSAGE DU MINISTRE .......................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 RÉSUMÉ ................................................................................. -
Mackenzie Highway Extension, for Structuring EIA Related Field Investigations and for Comparative Assessment of Alternate Routes
D. Mackenzie Valley Highway Extension D.1 Consultations An initial Stakeholder Workshop was held in Norman Wells on June 8, 1998. The workshop was attended by approximately 60 stakeholders and generated considerable discussion on the need-for, and benefits-of, an all-weather road. A meeting with the Sahtu Secretariat and the Sahtu Regional Land Corporation Presidents was held on November 12, 1998. The group reviewed the Terms of Reference for Environmental Scoping and Benefit Cost Studies. The Terms of Reference were also sent to other stakeholders invited to participate on the Advisory Committee. In December the Department established an Advisory Committee for this project consisting of 25 individuals representing a wide variety of interest groups and organizations. The Department has kept this committee informed of the status of projects, and held a meeting on March 17, 1999 in Norman Wells. A list of the committee members is provided below. C Sahtu Secretariat Incorporated, Ruby McDonald, C Deline Land Corporation, Raymond Taniton, C Fort Good Hope Metis Nation Local #54 Land Corporation, Wilfred McNeely Jr., C Ayoni Keh Land Corporation (Colville Lake), Wilbert Kochon, C Yamoga Land Corporation (Fort Good Hope), John Louison, C Tulita Land and Tulita District Land Corporation, Gordon Yakeleya, C Fort Norman Metis Local #60 Land Corporation, Eddie McPherson Jr., C Ernie McDonald Land Corporation (Norman Wells), Winter Lennie, C Gwich=in Tribal Council, Richard Nerysoo, C Town of Inuvik, George Roach, C Charter Community of Arctic Red -
Deh Cho First Nations Interim Resource Development Agreement
DEH CHO FIRST NATIONS INTERIM RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DUH GOGHA NDEH TS;EH SAAMBA HOLEH TS'EHK'EH ELEH SEEGOTS'ELEH DEH CHO FIRST NATIONS — GOVERNMENT OF CANADA INTERIM RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Canada Duh Gogha Ndeh ts;eh Saamba Holeh Ts'ehk'eh Eleh Seegots'eleh Interim Resource Development Agreement Between: THE DEH CHO FIRST NATIONS as represented by the Deh Cho First Nations Grand Chief (Deh Cho First Nations) and THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA as represented by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (Canada) WHEREAS the Deh Cho First Nations, Canada, and the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT), have agreed to negotiate agreements on land, resources and governance; and WHEREAS the Deh Cho First Nations, Canada, and the GNWT entered into an Interim Measures Agreement on May 23, 2001 in order to advance their negotiations; and WHEREAS the Deh Cho First Nations and the Crown disagree with respect to the interpretation of Treaties 8 & 11, including issues with respect to land ownership; WHEREAS clause 44 of the said Interim Measures Agreement commits Canada and the Deh Cho First Nations to enter negotiations for the purpose of concluding an interim resource development agreement, Now therefore the Parties agree as follows: Objective The objective of this Agreement is to foster resource development in the Deh Cho territory and to accrue benefits to the Deh Cho First Nations from Canada in the interim of a Deh Cho Final Agreement. Definitions In this Agreement, "Agreement" means this Agreement and "the date of this Agreement" means the date on which it is signed. -
Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim
Annual Report of the Implementation Committee April 1, 2000–March 31, 2001 Sahtu Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement 2001 Annual Report Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2001 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca QS-5354-021-BB-A1 Catalogue No. R31-10/2001 ISBN 0-662-66189-3 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada foreword The Implementation Committee is pleased to provide its annual report describes achievements and developments seventh annual report on the implementation of the Sahtu during the year. Information is contributed by various federal Dene and Metis Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement. The and territorial departments, the SSI and other bodies estab- report covers the fiscal year from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001. lished under the Agreement. The Implementation Committee comprises a senior official from We are committed to strengthening the partnerships that are each of the parties: the Sahtu Secretariat Incorporated (SSI), key to the successful implementation of this Agreement. Our the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) and achievements to date are the product of partners working the Government of Canada. It functions by consensus and together to recognize Aboriginal rights in an atmosphere of serves as a forum where parties can raise issues and voice mutual respect, and the commitment of the parties to fulfil obli- their concerns. gations pursuant to this Agreement. The role of the Implementation Committee is to oversee, direct and monitor implementation of the Agreement. This John Tutcho Mark Warren Aideen Nabigon Sahtu Secretariat Government of the Government of Incorporated Northwest Territories Canada 2000–2001 Annual Report | i table of contents Foreword . -
GNWT Infrastructure Plan: Industry Update, December 2020
GNWT Infrastructure Plan Industry Update – December 2020 Presentation Overview • GNWT Infrastructure Planning and Acquisition – 2021/22 GNWT Infrastructure Plan – 2021/22 Department of Infrastructure Capital Plan • Projects in Planning/Design • Transportation Projects • Infrastructure Corridor Projects • Municipal and Community Affairs/Communities • NWT Housing Corporation • Capital Projects Anticipated Tenders *Project budgets in this presentation include all costs to deliver the projects such as planning, design, construction and close-out costs. 2 GNWT Infrastructure Planning and Acquisition • The GNWT's 2021/22 Infrastructure Plan totals $451.2M. • The plan continues to leverage significant federal infrastructure dollars. – For copies of the 2021/22 Capital Estimates, reference the following GNWT website: – https://www.fin.gov.nt.ca/sites/fin/files/resources/2021- 22_capital_estimates.pdf – For GNWT Tendering and Contracting information, reference the following GNWT website: – https://www.fin.gov.nt.ca/en/services/contracting 3 Infrastructure Acquisition Plan Budget Trends $M Total Infrastructure Budgets by Fiscal Year $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 4 2021/22 GNWT Infrastructure Plan SUMMARY LARGE CAPITAL $424.1M SMALL CAPITAL $20.6M IM/IT $6.5M TOTAL $451.2M Large Capital Projects – budget oF $600,000 and above. Small Capital Projects - budget From $50,000 to 600,000. IM/IT – InFormation Management and InFormation Technology Projects. 5 2021/22 GNWT Infrastructure Plan SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT LEG $0.11M ECE $30.15M ENR $2.16M FIN $9.25M HSS $61.12M ITI $14.25M INF $292.77M JUS $1.54M LANDS $0.23M MACA $29.00M NWTHC $10.63M TOTAL $451.21M 6 2021/22 Department of Infrastructure Capital Plan • 2021/22 Capital Budget - $292,766,000. -
Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical
CIMFP Exhibit P-02332 Page 1 Brian George, P.Eng., FEC Mechanical Brian has over 40 years of specialized experience in mechanical engineering with over 25 years of working in Northern Canada. He has designed mechanical systems for apartments, hospitals, labs, offices, schools, warehouses, office buildings and apartments throughout Yukon, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories. Brian’s experience includes high and low pressure steam systems; central plants; piping stress analysis; direct bury and utilidor type distribution systems; plumbing systems; medical gas systems; fire protection systems; heating systems using radiant ceiling panel, perimeter radiation and slab heating system; site storm, sanitary and water services; water treatment and waste treatment facilities; ventilation and cooling systems of all types; dust collection and exhaust systems; EDUCATION fully computerized DDC controls, pneumatic and electric controls. He has worked Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering with Distinction, 1974 on a number of refrigeration systems from liquid ammonia beer cooling systems in University of Saskatchewan a brewery to brine/ammonia systems for hockey and curling arenas. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Except for Yellowknife, Hay River, Inuvik and Norman Wells almost all projects in AFFILIATIONS the North include some work on a fuel system for the buildilng. Brian has worked NAPEG, Former President, Life on fuel systems across the Arctic from small single tank systems feeding housing Member through to tank farms and dispensing systems serving communiteis and mine ASHRAE Life Member APEGS Life Member sites. APEY ACEC-NWT, Former President RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE PROGESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP AIRPORT FACILITIES NAPEG P.Eng. 1407 CERTIFICATIONS Combined Services Building; Yellowknife, NT Fundamentals of Infection Control Senior Mechanical Engineer for this design & field services project for the vehicle during Construction, Renovation or maintenance building at the YK Airport. -
Restrictions on Seismic Cut Lines and Cash Bonus Bidding. These Discussions with Canada Have Not Pro Gressed
restrictions on seismic cut lines and cash bonus bidding. These discussions with Canada have not pro gressed. On February 16, 2009, the Grand Chief received a letter from INAC which threatens to terminate the IRDA, along with the annual royalty payouts to the DFN, if there is no agreement by September 2009 to allow a new cycle of petroleum exploration. If agreement cannot be reached with Canada on terms and conditions for new exploration licenses the DFN may consider moving on their own to initiate a competitive bidding process to determine appropri ate terms and conditions for new exploration. In April. 2009 the Leadership passed a resolution calling for a renewed effort by both the DFN and Can ada to find agreement on terms and conditions for a new petroleum exploration cycle. DFN representa tives then held a meeting with INAC officials in September. 2009. At that meeting we confirmed that: • the DFN remain committed to the objective of having a new petroleum exploration rights issu ance cycle as soon as possible: • as set out in the IRDA, in order to meet this objective it is necessary for INAC and the DFN to jointly develop terms and conditions for the right issuance: and • DFN remain committed to working in good faith to find common ground on terms and condi tions. We also asked INAC to provide us with a written response to DFN concerns regarding: - exploration parcel sizes: - air and water emission standards: and - restrictions on seismic cut lines. Following the September. 2009 meeting the Grand Chief wrote to Minister Strahl confirming that the DFN are prepared to hold discussions on terms and conditions for new exploration. -
Volume 1: Overview and Impact Summary
Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Overview and Impact Summary Submitted to: National Energy Board and the Joint Review Panel Submitted by: Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited IPRCC.PR.2004.07 August 2004 Cover photograph courtesy of the Government of the Northwest Territories EIS FOR MACKENZIE GAS PROJECT VOLUME 1: OVERVIEW AND IMPACT SUMMARY CONTENTS Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Overview and Purpose ....................................................1-1 1.1.1 Background ......................................................................1-1 1.1.2 Environmental Impact Statement ....................................1-1 1.1.3 Project Purpose and Need ................................................1-2 1.1.4 Project Overview .............................................................1-2 1.1.5 Project Alternatives .........................................................1-3 1.2 Proponent Ownership ..................................................................1-7 1.2.1 Commercial Agreements .................................................1-7 1.3 Project Schedule ..........................................................................1-7 1.3.1 Regulatory Review and Approvals ..................................1-7 1.3.2 Project Phases ..................................................................1-8 1.4 Major Project Components ..........................................................1-9 -
Central Mackenzie Surface Water and Groundwater Baseline Assessment
May 21, 2015 Central Mackenzie Surface Water and Groundwater Baseline Assessment REPORT 2: PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Submitted to: Bruce Hanna Regional Science Coordinator Government of the Northwest Territories 867-920-6520 [email protected] Report Number: 1401835 Final Report 2 Distribution: REPORT GNWT - 5 copies Golder - 1 copy CENTRAL MACKENZIE SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER BASELINE ASSESSMENT - PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.1 Surface Water Quantity (Hydrology) .................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................................................