DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2005 A.2 Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2005 Parliamentary Service Commission Te Komihana O Te Whare Paremata Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Schedule 2, Clause 11 of the Parliamentary Service Act 2000 Report of the Parliamentary Service Commission Membership and Committees The Parliamentary Service Commission comprises representatives from all parties represented in Parliament. The membership of the Parliamentary Service Commission from 1 July 2004 was: Rt. Hon Jonathan Hunt, MP (Chairperson) until March 2005 Hon Margaret Wilson, MP (Chairperson) from March 2005 Peter Brown, MP (representing the NZ First party) Gerry Brownlee, MP (representing the Leader of the Opposition, and the National party) until August 2004 Hon Mark Burton, MP (representing the Leader of the House, and the Labour party) John Carter, MP (representing the National party) Rod Donald, MP (representing the Green party) Hon Peter Dunne, MP (representing the United Future New Zealand party) Jill Pettis, MP (representing the Labour Party) Simon Power, MP (representing the National party) from August 2004 Hon Matt Robson, MP (representing the Progressive Coalition party) Hon Richard Prebble, MP (representing the ACT New Zealand party) until July 2005 Rodney Hide, MP (representing the ACT New Zealand party) from July 2005 Tariana Turia, MP (representing the M7ori party) The House Committee was a committee of the Commission and its members comprised: Ann Hartley, MP (Chair) Marc Alexander, MP Deborah Coddington, MP Darren Hughes, MP Sue Kedgley, MP Pita Paraone, MP Pansy Wong, MP Sub-committees Security John Carter, MP (Chair) Ron Mark, MP Jill Pettis, MP Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2005 Parliamentary Service Commission 2 Te Komihana O Te Whare Paremata Arts Purchasing Hon David Benson-Pope, MP Rt. Hon Jonathan Hunt, MP (until March 2005) John Key, MP Members' Services Hon David Benson-Pope, MP John Carter, MP Ron Donald, MP Hon Peter Dunne, MP The Hon Mark Burton, MP, and John Carter, MP, were the Parliamentary Service Commission appointees to the Parliamentary Corporation pursuant to section 29(1)(c) of the Parliamentary Service Act 2000. Ten meetings of the Parliamentary Service Commission were held throughout the year ending 30 June 2005. Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2005 Parliamentary Service Commission 3 Te Komihana O Te Whare Paremata Making monthly financial information public In the interests of openness and accountability, the Commission decided that monthly financial information concerning the six Parliamentary Service departmental appropriations and the 11 non-departmental (including members' communications and travel and party and support budgets for the parliamentary parties) would be put on the Speaker's website. Financial information is also included for the Executive Wing refurbishment and for members' salaries and expenses. The information can be accessed at: www.speaker.parliament.govt.nz/Publications.htm. Parliamentary appropriations review The Parliamentary Service Act 2000 stipulates that a review of the parliamentary appropriations will take place at least once in each parliamentary session. The second review committee, chaired by John Goulter and with committee members Hon Doug Kidd and Hon Margaret Shields, published their report, Resourcing Parliament: Parliamentary Appropriations Review, in November 2004. The Commission discussed in detail the recommendations of the report, which centred on out-of-Parliament offices, information and communications technology and training and development opportunities for members' support staff. While some recommendations need further work at this point, progress has been made concerning training for support staff and guidelines for out-of-Parliament offices, which is discussed in more detail below. Progress has also been made by the five parliamentary agencies on collaborative ICT arrangements for the complex. Advertising paid for by Vote Parliamentary Service Media and public interest concerning advertising by members and parties paid for out of Vote Parliamentary Service prompted the Commission to reconsider the current guidelines. It was considered that there was a lack of clarity in the guidelines and the Commission spent a considerable amount of time discussing how to best amend the guidelines to ensure advertising guidelines, particularly newspaper advertising, would be clear to members and parties. However, given that the Auditor General's office was conducting its own investigation into Government and parliamentary publicity and advertising, the Commission decided to defer making any final decisions on guidelines until that report had been received. As the report was released 17 June 2005, the Commission has yet to study its recommendations. Out-of-Parliament office specification As mentioned above, the appropriations review report made a series of recommendations concerning the quality of out-of-Parliament offices leased by members. Most importantly, it was considered that the standard of office Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2005 Parliamentary Service Commission 4 Te Komihana O Te Whare Paremata accommodation was unsatisfactory for the member and their staff. As a response, the Commission assisted the Parliamentary Service to develop office specification guidelines to ensure health and safety issues for staff were considered when members were leasing premises. An office specification guideline was agreed to by the Commission in June this year. My predecessor, the Rt Hon Jonathan Hunt, left his position of Speaker in early March 2005, so I have come to the chair of the Parliamentary Service Commission somewhat late in the yearly cycle. However, I would like to pay a tribute to the good work done by Jonathan during his time as Chairperson of the Commission and to Commission members for their contributions. HON MARGARET WILSON, MP Speaker of the House of Representatives and Chairperson of the Parliamentary Service Commission Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2005 Parliamentary Service Commission 5 Te Komihana O Te Whare Paremata .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Woman Warns Others After House Burgled
    SOUTH ISLAND EDITION press.co.nz MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2010 Retail $1.40 MPs want Break-in drives family from home travel perk scrapped Andrea Vance WHAT THEY GET MPs across the political Backbench MPs are paid $131,000 a year before allowances. spectrum are calling for their The Remuneration Authority sets the base rate of their wage private travel perks to be and the Speaker decides on other entitlements such as scrapped after the resignation travel and office expenses. They are entitled to: of cabinet minister Pansy ■ Domestic travel, but this is not restricted to work-related Wong. trips. The Remuneration Authority considers 5 per cent of this Prime Minister John Key as a benefit and so deducts $1500 from each MP’s salary. said yesterday there was ‘‘a ■ Domestic travel for spouses/partners – as long as they are time and a place’’ for looking not conducting business. As this is also a benefit, a further at the travel perks. $3400 comes out of each MP’s salary. Speaking from Japan ■ Four free flights a year between Wellington and their home where he is attending the base for children of MPs. It is unlimited for under fives. Apec summit he said: ‘‘It’s ■ Discounted international travel for MPs, as long as they are possible there may need to be not conducting private business. some change but today’s not ■ Discounted international travel for their spouses, who must the day to make those not be travelling on business. comments. ‘‘It’s tripped up a number of MPs and that’s very unfor- ing a free travel privilege as a not sure that will ever mollify tunate.
    [Show full text]
  • 'About Turn': an Analysis of the Causes of the New Zealand Labour Party's
    Newcastle University e-prints Date deposited: 2nd May 2013 Version of file: Author final Peer Review Status: Peer reviewed Citation for item: Reardon J, Gray TS. About Turn: An Analysis of the Causes of the New Zealand Labour Party's Adoption of Neo-Liberal Policies 1984-1990. Political Quarterly 2007, 78(3), 447-455. Further information on publisher website: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com Publisher’s copyright statement: The definitive version is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00872.x Always use the definitive version when citing. Use Policy: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not for profit purposes provided that: A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source A link is made to the metadata record in Newcastle E-prints The full text is not changed in any way. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Robinson Library, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1 7RU. Tel. 0191 222 6000 ‘About turn’: an analysis of the causes of the New Zealand Labour Party’s adoption of neo- liberal economic policies 1984-1990 John Reardon and Tim Gray School of Geography, Politics and Sociology Newcastle University Abstract This is the inside story of one of the most extraordinary about-turns in policy-making undertaken by a democratically elected political party.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Political Influence Activities Under Xi Jinping Professor
    Magic Weapons: China's political influence activities under Xi Jinping Professor Anne-Marie Brady Global Fellow, Wilson Center, Washington, DC; Department of Political Science and International Relations University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand In September 2014 Xi Jinping gave a speech on the importance of united front work— political influence activities—calling it one of the CCP’s “magic weapons”. The Chinese government’s foreign influence activities have accelerated under Xi. China’s foreign influence activities have the potential to undermine the sovereignty and integrity of the political system of targeted states. Conference paper presented at the conference on “The corrosion of democracy under China’s global influence,” supported by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, and hosted in Arlington, Virginia, USA, September 16-17, 2017. Key points: • CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping is leading an accelerated expansion of political influence activities worldwide. • The expansion of these activities is connected to both the CCP government’s domestic pressures and foreign agenda. • The paper creates a template of the policies and modes of China’s expanded foreign influence activities in the Xi era. • The paper uses this template to examine the extent to which one representative small state, New Zealand, is being targeted by China’s new influence agenda. Executive Summary In June 2017 the New York Times and The Economist featured stories on China's political influence in Australia. The New York Times headline asked "Are Australia's Politics too Easy to Corrupt?,"1 while The Economist sarcastically referred to China as the "Meddle Country."2 The two articles were reacting to an investigation by Fairfax Media and ABC into the extent of China's political interference in Australia,3 that built on internal enquiries into the same issue by ASIO and Australia's Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet in 2015 and 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Our Children: Services for Children in Care
    The Treasury Budget 2011 Information Release Release Document June 2011 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2011 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: [1] 9(2)(a) - to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people [2] 9(2)(f)(iv) - to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality of advice tendered by ministers and officials [3] 9(2)(g)(i) - to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions [4] 9(2)(b)(ii) - to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information or who is the subject of the information [5] 9(2)(k) - to prevent the disclosure of official information for improper gain or improper advantage [6] 9(2)(j) - to enable the Crown to negotiate without disadvantage or prejudice [7] 6(a) - to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the international relations of the government [8] 9(2)(h) - to maintain legal professional privilege [9] 6(c) - to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial [10] 9(2)(d) - to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand [11] 9(2)(i) - to enable the Crown to carry out commercial activities without disadvantage or prejudice. Where information has been withheld, a numbered reference to the applicable section of the Official Information Act has been made, as listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Presence: Political Representation and New Zealand’S Asian Members of Parliament
    THE POLITICS OF PRESENCE: POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND NEW ZEALAND’S ASIAN MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT By Seonah Choi A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science at Victoria University of Wellington 2014 2 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 5 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter I: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II: Literature Review .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Representative Democracy ........................................................................................ 11 2.2 Theories of Political Representation .......................................................................... 12 2.3 Theories of Minority Representation ......................................................................... 27 2.4 Formulating a Framework ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 45(1): 14-30 Minor parties, ER policy and the 2020 election JULIENNE MOLINEAUX* and PETER SKILLING** Abstract Since New Zealand adopted the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) representation electoral system in 1996, neither of the major parties has been able to form a government without the support of one or more minor parties. Understanding the ways in which Employment Relations (ER) policy might develop after the election, thus, requires an exploration of the role of the minor parties likely to return to parliament. In this article, we offer a summary of the policy positions and priorities of the three minor parties currently in parliament (the ACT, Green and New Zealand First parties) as well as those of the Māori Party. We place this summary within a discussion of the current volatile political environment to speculate on the degree of power that these parties might have in possible governing arrangements and, therefore, on possible changes to ER regulation in the next parliamentary term. Keywords: Elections, policy, minor parties, employment relations, New Zealand politics Introduction General elections in New Zealand have been held under the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) system since 1996. Under this system, parties’ share of seats in parliament broadly reflects the proportion of votes that they received, with the caveat that parties need to receive at least five per cent of the party vote or win an electorate seat in order to enter parliament. The change to the MMP system grew out of increasing public dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the previous First Past the Post (FPP) or ‘winner-take-all’ system (NZ History, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Our Voices Sound Risky Business See More Seymour
    Where Our Voices Sound Risky Business See More Seymour Helen Yeung chats with Mermaidens (not the Jordan Margetts takes on Facebook, the Herald Meg Williams delves deep on a dinner date with Harry Potter kind) and that office sex scandal the ACT Party Leader [1] ISSUE ELEVEN CONTENTS 9 10 NEWS COMMUNITY NORTHLAND GRAVE A CHOICE VOICE ROBBING? An interview with the strong Unfortunately for Split Enz, it women behind Shakti Youth appears that history does repeat 13 14 LIFESTYLE FEATURES SHAKEN UP MORE POWER TO THE PUSSY Milkshake hotspots to bring more than just boys to your A look into the growing yard feminist porn industry 28 36 ARTS COLUMNS WRITERS FEST WRAP-UP BRING OUT THE LIONS! Craccum contributors review Mark Fullerton predicts the some literary luminaries outcomes of the forthcoming Lions Series [3] 360° Auckland Abroad Add the world to your degree Auckland Abroad Exchange Programme Application Deadline: July 1, 2017 for exchange in Semester 1, 2018 The 360° Auckland Abroad student exchange programme creates an opportunity for you to complete part of your University of Auckland degree overseas. You may be able to study for a semester or a year at one of our 130 partner universities in 25 countries. Scholarships and financial assistance are available. Come along to an Auckland Abroad information seminar held every Thursday at 2pm in iSPACE (level 4, Student Commons). There are 360° of exciting possibilities. Where will you go? www.auckland.ac.nz/360 [email protected] EDITORIAL Catriona Britton Samantha Gianotti The F-Word Margaret Atwood’s 1985 dystopian novel The in a later interview that the show is “obvious- ain’t about race, man.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Design and Māori Development in Aotearoa New Zealand
    Accounting for Diversity: Policy Design and Māori Development in Aotearoa New Zealand Prepared by Dena Ringold With funding from the sponsors of the Ian Axford Fellowship in Public Policy July 2005 © Fulbright New Zealand 2005 ISBN 0-437-10213-7 i The Ian Axford Fellowships in Public Policy We acknowledge and thank the following corporate and government sponsors that support the programme: • ERMA New Zealand • LEK Consulting • The Department of Internal Affairs • The Department of Labour • The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet • The Ministry for the Environment • The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry • The Ministry of Economic Development • The Ministry of Education • The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade • The Ministry of Health • The Ministry of Justice • The Ministry of Research, Science and Technology • The Ministry of Social Development • The State Services Commission • The Treasury The Ian Axford Fellowships were named in honour of Sir Ian Axford, a New Zealand astrophysicist and space scientist. Since his education in New Zealand, England and later at Cornell University and the University of California, Sir Ian has been closely involved in the planning of several space missions, notably the Voyager probes to the outer planets. Since 1974, Sir Ian has been director of the Max Planck Institute of Aeronomy in Germany. He is the recipient of many notable science awards and was named “New Zealander of the Year” for 1995. In the world of space science, Sir Ian has emerged as one of the great thinkers and communicators, and a highly respected and influential administrator. Currently, he is working to create the first mission to interstellar space with the Voyager spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Relating Maori and Pakeha : the Politics of Indigenous and Settler
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Relating Maori and Pakeha: the politics of indigenous and settler identities A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology at Massey University Palmerston North New Zealand Avril Bell 2004 Abstract Settler colonisation produced particular colonial subjects: indigene and settler. The specificity of the relationship between these subjects lies in the act of settlement; an act of colonial violence by which the settler physically and symbolically displaces the indigene, but never totally. While indigenes may be physically displaced from their territories, they continue to occupy a marginal location within the settler nation-state. Symbolically, as settlers set out to distinguish themselves from the metropolitan ‘motherlands’, indigenous cultures become a rich, ‘native’ source of cultural authenticity to ground settler nationalisms. The result is a complex of conflictual and ambivalent relations between settler and indigene. This thesis investigates the ongoing impact of this colonial relation on the contemporary identities and relations of Maori (indigene) and Pakeha (settlers) in Aotearoa New Zealand. It centres on the operation of discursive strategies used by both Maori and Pakeha in constructing their identities and the relationship between them. I analyse ‘found’ texts - non-fiction books, media and academic texts - to identify discourse ‘at work’, as New Zealanders make and reflect on their identity claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Questions Network News December 2011 May 2011 Kia Ora, Advent and Christmas Greetings Friends
    Contact: Betsan Martin Email: [email protected] Ph: 04 473-2627/ 021-388-337 Public Questions Network News December 2011 May 2011 Kia ora, Advent and Christmas greetings friends Contents: Methodist Conference Inequality Elections and Public Questions media release Environment - fracking Green Paper and Welfare Reform Item for Parish newsletters Methodist Conference President John Roberts gave a very strong lead on social and environmental justice in his induction address. He re-ignited the ‘preferential option for the poor’ as a gospel based focus on justice, and highlighted that the growing inequality in Aotearoa-New Zealand is an affront to growing a fair society. Council of Conference Mission Priority, which was agreed to at Conference is: ‘let the Children Live, ending child poverty, child abuse and youth suicide in New Zealand.’ During the Public Questions session at Conference we asked for discussion on two questions: 1. What would you like to say to political leaders about poverty and inequality? 2. What do you suggest that churches can do about poverty and inequality? We produced a resource for parish discussions from the Conference discussion. This is on the Public Questions website< www.methodist.org.nz/public_questions_network > Elections and Public Questions Media Release Elections have delivered us a National led government in coalition with the Māori Party, United Future and Act. This gives the Government 64 seats – a little more than the majority of 61 needed for the Government to pass legislation. Some portfolios are the same, such as Bill English as Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister. Paula Bennett as Minister of Social Development is promoted to the front bench.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Issue As a PDF File
    The Jobs Letter No. 171 30 August 2002 Essential Information on an Essential Issue • The Jobs Letter editors admit being as surprised as anyone when KEY watching the spectacular crumbling of support for the National Party in the last election and the consequent rise in popularity of the smaller WORK / LIFE BALANCE parties New Zealand First (10.38% of the vote and 13 seats) and United WHOS WHO 2002 Future (6.69% of the votes and 8 seats). A common question asked in the weeks following the election was: Just what do these parties really NZ FIRST AND UNITED FUTURE believe in? THE FAMILY With NZ First, we did contact the party before the election to ask them WINZ AND THE INTERNET to fill out their policy platform in terms of employment issues (see FUTURE OF WORK RESEARCH special issue of The Jobs Letter No.168), but — unlike every other party YOUTH EMPLOYMENT — they never got back to us. NZ First really only campaigned on three RESEARCH issues during the election —”fixing up” the immigration mess, the FUNDING TO THE COMMUNITY Treaty of Waitangi “industry”, and law and order. SECTOR Given their thirteen parliamentary seats, we thought we would try again REFUGEES AND MIGRANTS for this issue ... but unfortunately, despite our phonecalls and emails, we got the same lack of response. DIARY • For our special election issue, The Jobs Letter editors completely ignored United Future in terms of asking them our standard employ- ment policy questions ... yes, we certainly got that wrong! So, as with NZ 6 August 2002 First, we thought we’d give the party a chance to flesh out their policies Air NZ is advertising to attract 150 more aircraft engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders' Debate – Don Brash and Helen Clark 22Nd
    LEADERS’ DEBATE – DON BRASH AND HELEN CLARK 22ND AUGUST 2005, TVONE PRESENTER: MARK SAINSBURY MARK SAINSBURY: Good evening. Welcome to this One News special – the Leaders’ Debate. I’m Mark Sainsbury. In less than four weeks, one of our two guests tonight will be destined to lead the country as Prime Minister for the next three years. They are, of course, Helen Clark, Labour’s leader and current Prime Minister – welcome. And welcome also to National’s Don Brash, currently Leader of the Opposition. Tonight for the first time, they meet in a televised debate. We’re here in our Auckland studios in front of an audience made up of an equal number of Labour supporters on one side, and on the other, those backing National this election. Before we begin, just a few rules – this will be a debate. We hope that the two leaders will engage with each other and not have to wait for me to invite them in, but I am here to moderate the discussion, to discourage overly lengthy answers and to make sure we hear from both. Now, we’ll be giving you at home a chance to participate in this debate as well. Go to the website www.tvnz.co.nz and type in the word ‘debate’ and you can email us till 9 o’clock tonight with your thoughts. We’ll be reporting that reaction later in the evening on Tonight and tomorrow on One News and Close Up at 7. Well, let’s get started. We’ve tossed a coin and the first speaker will be Don Brash.
    [Show full text]