New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual IND 1 NEW ZEALAND HANSARD PRECEDENT MANUAL Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL The Precedent Manual shows how procedural events in the House appear in the Hansard report. It does not include events in Committee of the whole House on bills; they are covered by the Committee Manual. This manual is concerned with structure and layout rather than text - see the Style File for information on that. NB: The ways in which the House chooses to deal with procedural matters are many and varied. The Precedent Manual might not contain an exact illustration of what you are looking for; you might have to scan several examples and take parts from each of them. The wording within examples may not always apply. The contents of each section and, if applicable, its subsections, are included in CONTENTS at the front of the manual. At the front of each section the CONTENTS lists the examples in that section. Most sections also include box(es) containing background information; these boxes are situated at the front of the section and/or at the front of subsections. The examples appear in a column format. The left-hand column is an illustration of how the event should appear in Hansard; the right-hand column contains a description of it, and further explanation if necessary. At the end is an index. Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 3 INDEX Absence of Minister see Minister not present Amendment/s to motion Abstention/s ..........................................................VOT3-4 Address in reply ....................................................OP12 Acting Minister answers question.......................... QUE5 Adjournment debate .............................................DEB7 Address in Reply Appointment of Deputy Speaker.............................AP2 Amendment/s Budget Statement .................................................... FP8 to motion ......................................................... OP12 Business carried forward....................................OPB16 voted on at ending of debate ........................... OP12 Imprest Supply Bill ................................................. FP4 Debate resumes..................................................... OP11 Referral of S.O.P. to select committtee ................ SC13 Ending Sittings ...............................................................OPB14 for each day’s debate....................................... OP11 Vote—primary motion ........................................ VOT5 for primary motion.......................................... OP12 Vote—more than one.......................................... VOT5 First speaker.......................................................... OP11 Amendments to resolutions..................................... RES3 Heading................................................................. OP11 Amendments to Standing Orders .......................... STO2 Motion that address in reply be presented to Answer to question Governor-General ........................................... OP12 Acting Minister ................................................... QUE5 Queen.............................................................. OP15 Amended ................ see Amended answer to question Reply entered in Journals..........................OFF4, OP13 Associate Minister ..............................................QUE5 Seconder ............................................................... OP11 Editing................................................................. QUE1 Speaker announces address in reply presented to Minister warned about answer ............................ QUE6 Governor-General ........................................... OP13 On behalf of Minister .......................................... QUE5 Queen.............................................................. OP17 On behalf of member........................................... QUE5 Speaker reads text of address in reply to Question to member ............................................ QUE5 Governor-General .......................................... OP12 Standard format................................................... QUE4 Queen.............................................................. OP17 Supplementary question...................................... QUE4 Vote/s on amendment/s......................................... OP12 ruled out of order ........................................... QUE6 Address—Officers of Parliament Applause .................................................................... VIS2 ..................................... see Officers of Parliament Appointments (see also Membership) Address—Special...............see Special address to Queen Assistant Speaker ....................................................AP2 Adjournment debate Auditors (Officers of Parliament)......................... OFF4 Amendment ......................................................... DEB7 Deputy Speaker .......................................................AP2 No valedictories................................................... DEB8 Governor-General—mentioned in House................AP4 Resumption date not specified............................. DEB8 Intelligence and Security Committee ......................AP4 Resumption date specified................................... DEB7 More than one motion at same time ........................AP3 Valedictories........................................................ VAL2 Officer/s of Parliament........................................ AP2-3 Vote on amendment............................................. DEB7 Other body associated with Parliament ...................AP3 Vote on motion .................................................... DEB7 Parliamentary Service Commission ............ OP10; AP5 Adjournment of debate Select committee/s............................................... SC3-5 Agreed to............................................................. DEB9 Standing Orders Committee ................................. STO2 At end of urgency ................................................ DEB9 Appropriation Bill Not agreed to ....................................................... DEB9 and Imprest Supply debate ...................................... FP5 Vote ..................................................................... DEB9 Budget Statement ...................... see Budget Statement Adjournment of House..................... see House adjourns Estimates .................................................see Estimates Admission to Chamber, lobbies, and galleries ......GR2 Financial Reviews .....................see Financial Reviews Adoption Supplementary Estimates Address in reply.................................................... OP12 ................................see Supplementary Estimates Standing Orders amendments ...............................STO2 Appropriations—Officers of Parliament Amended answer to question ......................................see Officers of Parliament Leave declined................................................... QUE13 Assistant Speaker Ministerial statement ......................................... QUE13 Appointment.......................................AP2; OP9; SPK4 Personal explanation......................... PEX7; QUE13-14 References to........................................................ SPK6 Point of order..................................................... QUE14 Associate Minister answers question..................... QUE5 Amendments recommended by select committee Authority to administer oath .....................................OP8 Agreed to Not agreed to ........................................................LEG8 Vote ......................................................................LEG7 Ballot for members' bills .......................................OPB15 Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 4 Beginning of day Bill to go through more than one stage .........LEG19-20 On ringing of bell ...................................................BD2 Business of the House Standard..................................................................BD2 Business Statement..................see Business Statement Urgency ..................................................................BD2 Carried forward .............see Business carried forward Bell not rung Debate interrupted..............................................OPB10 Chairperson raises question ................................. MSP2 House debates procedure....................................OPB13 Member raises question ....................................... MSP2 Members' bills ................................ see Members’ bills Presence of Minister ............................................ MSP2 Leave to vary order of business Bill bill.............................................................. OP11-12 Committee stage.. see Committee of the whole House more than three bills .......................................OPB9 Committee stage omitted other than bill...................................................OP10 ....................... see Committee of the whole House separately re two bills .....................................OPB9 Consideration of report...see Consideration of reports up to three bills ...............................................OPB9 Discharge........................................LEG10, 22; OPB12 Order of business Divided by Committee motion to vary.................................................OPB8 into up to three bills ......................................LEG14
Recommended publications
  • Adapting to Institutional Change in New Zealand Politics
    21. Taming Leadership? Adapting to Institutional Change in New Zealand Politics Raymond Miller Introduction Studies of political leadership typically place great stress on the importance of individual character. The personal qualities looked for in a New Zealand or Australian leader include strong and decisive action, empathy and an ability to both reflect the country's egalitarian traditions and contribute to a growing sense of nationhood. The impetus to transform leaders from extraordinary people into ordinary citizens has its roots in the populist belief that leaders should be accessible and reflect the values and lifestyle of the average voter. This fascination with individual character helps account for the sizeable biographical literature on past and present leaders, especially prime ministers. Typically, such studies pay close attention to the impact of upbringing, personality and performance on leadership success or failure. Despite similarities between New Zealand and Australia in the personal qualities required of a successful leader, leadership in the two countries is a product of very different constitutional and institutional traditions. While the overall trend has been in the direction of a strengthening of prime ministerial leadership, Australia's federal structure of government allows for a diffusion of leadership across multiple sources of influence and power, including a network of state legislatures and executives. New Zealand, in contrast, lacks a written constitution, an upper house, or the devolution of power to state or local government. As a result, successive New Zealand prime ministers and their cabinets have been able to exercise singular power. This chapter will consider the impact of recent institutional change on the nature of political leadership in New Zealand, focusing on the extent to which leadership practices have been modified or tamed by three developments: the transition from a two-party to a multi-party parliament, the advent of coalition government, and the emergence of a multi-party cartel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromley Cemetery Guide
    Bromley Cemetery Tour Compiled by Richard L. N. Greenaway June 2007 Block 1A Row C No. 33 Hurd Born at Hinton, England, Frank James Hurd emigrated with his parents. He worked as a contractor and, in 1896, in Wellington, married Lizzie Coker. The bride, 70, claimed to be 51 while the groom, 40, gave his age as 47. Lizzie had emigrated on the Regina in 1859 with her cousin, James Gapes (later Mayor of Christchurch) and his family and had already been twice-wed. Indeed, the property she had inherited from her first husband, George Allen, had enabled her second spouse, John Etherden Coker, to build the Manchester Street hotel which bears his name. Lizzie and Frank were able to make trips to England and to Canada where there dwelt Lizzie’s brother, once a member of the Horse Guards. Lizzie died in 1910 and, two years later, Hurd married again. He and his wife lived at 630 Barbadoes Street. Hurd was a big man who, in old age he had a white moustache, cap and walking stick. He died, at 85, on 1 April 1942. Provisions of Lizzie’s will meant that a sum of money now came to the descendants of James Gapes. They were now so numerous that the women of the tribe could spend their inheritance on a new hat and have nothing left over. Block 2 Row B No. 406 Brodrick Thomas Noel Brodrick – known as Noel - was born in London on 25 December 1855. In 1860 the Brodricks emigrated on the Nimrod. As assistant to Canterbury’s chief surveyor, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Kaipātiki Local Board
    Kaipātiki Local Board OPEN MINUTES Minutes of a meeting of the Kaipātiki Local Board held in the Kaipātiki Local Board Office, 90 Bentley Avenue, Glenfield on Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 04:05pm. PRESENT Chairperson John Gillon Deputy Chairperson Danielle Grant Members Paula Gillon Ann Hartley, JP Kay McIntyre, QSM Anne-Elise Smithson Adrian Tyler Lindsay Waugh ALSO PRESENT Councillor Richard Hills 5.40pm, from Item 19 to 5.36pm, Item 21. Kaipātiki Local Board 16 May 2018 1 Welcome 2 Apologies There were no apologies. Secretarial note: Apology from Councillor Chris Darby for absence was noted. 3 Declaration of Interest Member A Hartley declared an interest in the North Shore Centres of Mutual Aid Incorporated funding application. (LG1802-203) under item 21 – Kaipatiki Local Grants, Round Three 2017/2018 grant applications and left the meeting during this item. Member A Smithson declared an interest in the Children’s Autism Foundation funding application (LG1808-328) under item 21 – Kaipātiki Local Grants, Round Three 2017/2018 grant applications and left the meeting during this item. 4 Confirmation of Minutes Resolution number KT/2018/78 MOVED by Chairperson J Gillon, seconded by Member A Hartley: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 and the extraordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 9 May 2018, as a true and correct record. CARRIED 5 Leave of Absence There were no leaves of absence. 6 Acknowledgements 6.1 David Mitchell, Architect Resolution number KT/2018/79 MOVED by Member L Waugh, seconded by Member K McIntyre: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) acknowledge the passing of David Mitchell and express its condolences to his family.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Partners: the Future of US-New Zealand Relations
    Pacific Partners Pacific a report of the csis southeast asia program and the new zealand institute of international affairs Pacific Partners the future of u.s.–new zealand relations 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Principal Authors Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Ernest Z. Bower E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Brian J. Lynch Contributors Bower/Lynch Robert Ayson John Ballingall David Capie Ai Ghee Ong Roberto Rabel Suse Reynolds Jon Tanner February 2011 ISBN 978-0-89206-623-0 Ë|xHSKITCy066230zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS a report of the csis southeast asia program and the new zealand institute of international affairs Pacific Partners the future of u.s.–new zealand relations Principal Authors Ernest Z. Bower Brian J. Lynch Contributors Robert Ayson John Ballingall David Capie Ai Ghee Ong Roberto Rabel Suse Reynolds Jon Tanner February 2011 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and Inter- national Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmak- ers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Tapsell (New Zealand Politician)
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search Wikipedia Peter Tapsell (New Zealand politician) Main page From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contents Sir Peter Wilfred Tapsell Featured content The Honourable Current events KNZM MBE FRCS FRCSEd (21 Sir Peter Tapsell Random article January 1930 – 5 April 2012) KNZM MBE FRCS FRCSEd Donate to Wikipedia was Speaker of the New Wikipedia store Zealand House of Interaction Representatives from 1993 to 1996. He was notable for being Help [2] About Wikipedia the first Māori Speaker, and Community portal for being the first Speaker since Recent changes Bill Barnard in 1943 to hold Contact page office while not a member of the governing party. Tools What links here He was an orthopaedic surgeon Related changes before entering politics.[3][4] Upload file Special pages Contents [hide] Permanent link 1 Early life Page information 2 Member of Parliament Wikidata item 2.1 Speaker of the House Cite this page of Representatives 24th Speaker of the House of 3 Retirement Representatives Print/export 4 References In office Create a book 1993–1996 Download as PDF Prime Minister Jim Bolger Printable version Early life [ edit ] Preceded by Robin Gray In other projects Tapsell was born and raised in Succeeded by Doug Kidd Wikimedia Commons Rotorua, and went to Rotorua 30th Minister of Defence Boys' High School. With the In office Languages help of a scholarship, he 9 February 1990 – 2 November 1990 Français Prime Minister Geoffrey Palmer Edit links studied medicine at the University of Otago,[5] Preceded by Bob Tizard graduating in 1952.
    [Show full text]
  • Rjffitrt51;&~~JI11-J~Fl1~~5(R(~~Ri1j
    UNIVERSITY OF tJAWAII LIBRARY arianas %riety;;~ Micronesia's Leading Newspaper Since 1972 ~ ~ mess FY 1997 outstanding advances totaled $83,576.55. preliminary findings on the fi­ "We will monitor the imple­ accounting division, which "is The public auditor said the fi­ nancial and compliance audit of mentation of our recommenda­ working on it (the update)." nance department had "failed to the I 0th legislature for fiscal year tions and should the advances re­ The Department of Finance, or collect or make salary deductions I 996·showed. main uncollected or unliquidated DOF, received LaMotte 's letter when the traveler did not return The outstanding travel ad­ by the completion of our field­ and report last Oct. 10, and it unused advances or submit travel vances, according to Public Au­ work, the same findings will be hasn 'tdrafted a reply yet, the lady liquidation reports on time." ditor Leo L. LaMotte, were as of included in our audit report," staffer said. "Our review also showed that Aug. 21 this year. LaMotte told Camacho. "Some of the information are DOF allowed some travel ad­ These outstanding advances Contacted, Camacho's office outdated," she said, adding that vances for canceled trips to be included those that have remained tQld the Variety that some of the some of the legislators had been returned by a series of salary de­ unliquidated and advances that involved senators and congress­ "cleared alrea~y." ductions instead of requiring the were unreturned after trip cancel­ men had been cleared. Of the total advances, accord­ traveler to return the full amount of the travel advance at one time," Leo L.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium on Retirement Income Policy
    Symposium on Retirement Income Policy Looking back and looking forward Wednesday, 16 April 2008 TASK FORCES IN THE 1990s AND THE POLITICAL ACCORD Task Force on Private Provision for Retirement Politics, not economics or demographics, was the key driver of the retirement policy debate of the nineties. The appointment of the Task Force on Private Provision for Retirement on 10 October 1991 by Prime Minister Jim Bolger was, for me, the first step on a fascinating journey of research, education, consultation and consensus which extended through the decade. During the 1990s New Zealand re-constructed and developed its simple two part system for providing income in retirement based on public provision of a basic pension (New Zealand Superannuation) and voluntary private savings. Retirement savings were tax-neutral compared with other forms of financial savings. The 1990s began with radical changes to national super announced in the 1991 budget that would have converted the pension into a welfare benefit. The government was forced to backtrack and was left wondering what to do. Announcing the formation of the 1991 Task Force, the New Zealand Herald’s Simon Collins, under the heading Task force to study compulsory super, reported that the eight-member task force “will consider requiring New Zealanders to contribute to compulsory private pension schemes. The eight-member task force will also consider tax incentives for retirement saving, regulation of superannuation schemes and compulsory retirement ages. The group would report to a joint cabinet-caucus committee chaired by the Prime Minister, Mr Bolger.” In fact, the Hon WF (Bill) Birch was our principal government contact.
    [Show full text]
  • "Unfair" Trade?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Garcia, Martin; Baker, Astrid Working Paper Anti-dumping in New Zealand: A century of protection from "unfair" trade? NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, No. 39 Provided in Cooperation with: New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), Wellington Suggested Citation: Garcia, Martin; Baker, Astrid (2005) : Anti-dumping in New Zealand: A century of protection from "unfair" trade?, NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, No. 39, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), Wellington This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66072 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • Election Will Be Crush Vs Smile It Was Fashionable at One Point in the Last Generation and a Half for Some Men to Refer to Their Inner Feminism
    JT col for July 18 2020 - Crush v smile Election will be crush vs smile It was fashionable at one point in the last generation and a half for some men to refer to their inner feminism. I was one. But past performance not withstanding, I must still be viewed as a male chauv…or worse, an old male chauv. There, I’ve said it. The risk in what follows seems less: I’m delighted the leadership of the country will be contested by two women, Jacinda Ardern versus Judith Collins. How appropriate, given we were the first to “allow” women to vote. Not- withstanding further accidents, we’re headed into an election in which a woman is guaranteed to be Prime Minister. I must have had an inkling about this, because last week I went along to see Collins for myself. A self-declared good mate of Johnathan Young’s, she turned up in Taranaki to speak at his election launch, visit around, promote her recently published memoirs, et cetera. I was one of 110 people keen enough to brave a freezing night to observe this politician with a long game; good sense told us she was probably positioning for a post-election leadership run after Todd Muller was sacrificed on the altar of Ardern. Even if Collins can't out-Ardern her opponent come September, she'll hold on. Her strategy is one based on people's short memories for her missteps since she got into parliament 18 years ago. The National Party also seems temporarily to have lost its appetite for the youngish and the novel.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 9 8.5 8 8 7 Roll Call
    ROLL CALL – How Our MPs Performed In 2011 Trans Tasman’s Editors have once again run their rule over NZ’s MPs and rated their performance in 2011. Roll Call looks at how they’ve performed in Caucus, Cabinet, Committee, the House, their electorate and the influence they bring, or are likely, to bring to bear in their various forums. This year being election year, there are some MPs who are no longer with us, and a host of newcomers and some better known returnees, who are not rated, but on whom we have commented regarding what we know of them, and what to expect from them. As we are rating MPs for their 2011 performances, new Cabinet or shadow Cabinet roles are not included. Cabinet Ministers This 2010 Year’s Name Seat/list Responsibilities Comments Rating Rating Key, John Helensville Prime Minister, Minister of Tourism, As one of NZ’s most popular ever PMs, Key did Ministerial Services, Minister in Charge what was needed by his party and delivered of the NZ Security, Intelligence Service, National a second term based almost entirely Minister Responsible for the GCSB upon “Brand Key.” Some of the Teflon armour flaked off over the year and some of his strongest supporters wonder whether he has a plan beyond careful political management 9 9 and upsetting as few people as possible. In the House Key was comfortable most of the time, though once or twice he showed a mean streak. He took a bit of a battering during the campaign itself, but a win is a win is a win.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVONPORT-TAKAPUNA LOCAL BOARD.20101215.Minutes
    Devonport-Takapuna Local Board OPEN MINUTES Minutes of a meeting of the Devonport-Takapuna Local Board held in the Council Chamber, Takapuna Service Centre Level 3, 1 The Strand, Takapuna, on Wednesday 15 December 2010 at 6.05pm. PRESENT Chairperson Chris Darby Deputy Chairperson Kevin Schwass Members Joseph Bergin Mike Cohen, QSM Dianne Hale, QSO, JP Jan O'Connor ALSO PRESENT Councillor George Wood (North Shore Ward) Councillor Ann Hartley (North Shore Ward) Kaipatiki Local Board Chairperson Lindsay Waugh Kaipatiki Local Board Member Kay McIntyre Devonport-Takapuna Local Board 15 December 2010 1 Prayer The meeting commenced with a minute of quiet reflection. 2 Apologies There were no apologies. 3 Declaration of interest Members were reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. Member Schwass declared an interest in Item 21 : “Auckland Council's submission on the Alcohol Reform Bill”. Item 9: Public Forum and Item 7 : Petitions, were taken at this time. 9 Public Forum Ms Judy Grieve a resident of 13 Second Avenue, Stanley Point, made Members aware of the pohutakawa trees in Stanley Point that had been hard trimmed, just prior to flowering in early December. Ms Grieve felt that this had desecrated the avenue of pohutakawa trees, and was seeking information on who had given the authority for the trees to be trimmed. Members sought clarification on what jurisdiction the power company has in relation to street trees that are interfering with power lines; whether the street tree trimming in Second Avenue, Stanley Point, was driven by the utility company, Auckland Council, or had been undertaken by Auckland Transport to remove the tree branches that had been over the road; and whether the NSCC undergrounding policy would continue under the Auckland Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Kaipātiki Local Board
    Kaipātiki Local Board OPEN MINUTES Minutes of the meeting of the Kaipātiki Local Board held in the Kaipātiki Local Board Office, 90 Bentley Avenue, Glenfield on Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 4.00pm. PRESENT Chairperson Danielle Grant Deputy John Gillon Chairperson Members Paula Gillon Ann Hartley, JP Kay McIntyre, QSM Anne-Elise Smithson Adrian Tyler Lindsay Waugh ALSO PRESENT Councillor Chris Darby Kaipātiki Local Board 15 November 2017 1 Welcome 2 Apologies There were no apologies. 3 Declaration of Interest There were no declarations of interest. 4 Confirmation of Minutes Resolution number KT/2017/161 MOVED by Member P Gillon, seconded by Member A Smithson: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Wednesday, 18 October 2017, as a true and correct record. CARRIED 5 Leave of Absence There were no leaves of absence. 6 Acknowledgements 6.1 Recipients of Kaipatiki Local Board Secondary School Scholarship grant The Kaipātiki Local Board acknowledged the recipients of the 2017 Kaipātiki Local Board Secondary Schools Scholarship. Resolution number KT/2017/162 MOVED by Member L Waugh, seconded by Member A Hartley: That the Kaipātiki Local Board: a) acknowledge Denzil Whitcombe and Memory Tuitupou of Northcote College, Stefania Cotos of Glenfield College, and Denise Jarry and Sherry Ng of Birkenhead College as recipients of the 2017 Kaipātiki Local Board Secondary Schools Scholarship and wish them all the very best for their futures. CARRIED 7 Petitions There were no petitions. Minutes Page 3 Kaipātiki Local Board 15 November 2017 8 Deputations There were no deputations. 9 Public Forum There was no public forum.
    [Show full text]