SF Commentary 55/56
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
® S F COMMENTARY the independent magazine about science fiction JANUARY/OCTOBER 1979 Australia $2 USA/Canada $3 SFC 55/56 TENTH anniversary EDITION AUSTRALIAN SCIENCE FICTION: A NEW BOOM? pages 5 to 45 REGISTERED FOR REGISTERED POSTING AS A PUBLICATION-CATEGORY B' S F C O M M E N T A R Y 5 5 / 5 6 January/October 1979 Australia: $2.00 (double issue) 68 pages $5/5 subscription USA/Canada: $3.00 (double issue) newsstand $6/5 subscription Elsewhere: Australian equivalent I MUST BE TALKING TO MY FRIENDS Editor John Berry Don Ashby Rick Stooker Alexander Doniphan Wallace George Turner Cy Anders 4, 46 and includes I MUST BE TALKING TO OUR FRIENDS, TOO Elaine Cochrane 48 AUSTRALIAN SCIENCE FICTION: A NEW BOOM? A MEATY BOOK FOR INTELLECTUAL CARNIVORES Sneja Gunew discusses Beloved Son, by George Turner 5 SCIENCE FICTION IN AUSTRALIA A complete survey by George Turner 7 ROOMS OF PARADISE-. TW O V IE W S Bruce Gillespie and Henry Gasko 9 THE MAN WHO FILLED THE VOID Bruce Gillespie discusses Envisaged Worlds, Other Worlds, and Alien Worlds, edited by Paul Collins 16 BY OUR FRUITS... Bruce Gillespie discusses The View from the Edge, edited by George Turner 22 TOO MUCH POWER FOR THE IMPOTENT Bruce Gillespie discusses Moon in the Ground, by Keith Antill 25 WHY DID THE SKY WEEP? Rob Gerrand, John Foyster, Lee Harding, and Bruce Gillespie discuss The Weeping Sky, by Lee Harding 30 LIGHT IN THE GREYWORLD Rob Gerrand discusses Displaced Person, by Lee Harding 36 GENTLE ESCAPISM IN PRETTY PASTEL COLOURS Henry Gasko discusses The Luck o f Brin’s Five, by Cherry Wilder 38 AUSTRALIAN SCIENCE FICTION: IS THAT ALL THERE IS? Andrew Whitmore discusses Walkers on the Sky, by David Lake and Future Sanctuary, by Lee Harding 42 Editor and Publisher: Bruce Gillespie, GPO Box 5195AA, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. (03) 419 4797. Subscriptions: Australia: $5 for 5, or $10 for 10. USA & Canada: $6 for 5 or $12 for 10 from Hank and Lesleigh Luttrell, 525 West Main, Madison, WI 53703, USA. Elsewhere: Equivalent of Australian subscription rate. Please submit in equivalent of Australian currency (ie, get cheques converted to Australian dollars first). Registered for posting as a publication—Category ‘B’. Final stencil typed 17 September 1979. I MUST BE TALKING TO MY FRIENDS TEN YEARS! with me on what SFC was good at... and I was 1 always surprised when people 'Why bother with a Tenth Anniversary praised it. I've published SFC for Edition?' was said to me recently. ten years because it was enjoyable - Why indeed? Because we got here. I met many new people, and writers Touch and go, and all that. Plant a kept sending me great articles. I've flag halfway up Everest, even if the published less frequently during re summit is still a long way off (twenty- cent years because rising postage one years? twenty-five?). rates have made the whole job less A Tenth Anniversary Edition is enjoyable. (Rates tripled overnight needed to thank everybody who made it in 1974.) SFC =? Instant Poverty these possible. Sometimes I think that is days. But the magazine will continue almost everybody in science fiction because producing it -is still a lot except me. If I mention names, then more enjoyable than anything I do to somebody will be left out and get make a living. offended. So I won't unroll the long 1969 does not seem too far away, ! list of people who have been indis when I think about it. Prices were pensable to every issue of SFC- much lower. Melbourne fans were get Some people, however, were there ting used to the heady idea of bidding right at the beginning: George Turner, for a World Convention in 1975. I was who contributed to the first issue, stuck up at Ararat. The world's worst and is still here; Lee Harding, who teacher. My own life became more and collated and produced the first more desolate until the beginning of : two issues, and.who has written a lot 1971. To compensate (I suppose), I of books since then; John Bangsund, turned out 18 issues of SFC in its Whose Fault It All Is; Leigh Edmonds, first two years-. I don't have as much who also helped a lot on the first energy as I had in 1969. My enthu issue; Stephen Campbell', who . drew siasm was fed by marvellous letters covers for and collated many of the and fanzines from nearly everybody early issues; John Foyster-, whose (whatever happened to Barry Gillam? writings for ASFR were an inspiration, Sandra Miesel? Philip Dick?). and who edited six issues of SFC; 1971 saw my return to Melbourne, to Barry Gillam, who wrote for many of a congenial job in the Education De the early issues, and who edited SFC partment's Publications Branch. It also saw the closure of the old Mel 16; Brian Aldiss and Philip Dick, who bourne Science Fiction Club, and the wrote to a fan of theirs; ...and ... beginning of Space Age Books, pro now I've left out your name, I'll bet. prietor Merv Binns, who is the centre of Melbourne fandom whatever else A Tenth Anniversary Edition is a happens. fit occasion for self-congratulation. But I can never find anyone who agrees (Continued on Page 46) 4 SFC 5 5 /5 6 A MEATY BOOK FOR INTELLECTUAL CARNIVORES Sneja Gunew discusses: Beloved Son by George Turner (Faber £ Faber; 1978; 375 pp; $15 Pocket Books 81696.9; 1979; 371 pp; $US2.25 Sphere Books; 1979) To call Beloved Son a thesis novel is On the face of it, we get several to praise it, when you recall that narrative voices, intended, I presume, Brian Aldiss derives one major area to provide several perspectives on the of s f from the eighteenth-century new society, and leave the final (Age of Reason) philosophical tale. estimate to the reader. The trouble Because that is where its strengths is that, in the long run, they all lie; it is a novel of ideas rather sound alike. Ultimately, the voice is than characters. the same, even though it issues from The ideas themselves, concerning apparently quite different figures, the possible evolution of a post-holo all with very different axes to grind. caust society, are fascinating. The They range from the old Ombudsman f ramework is respectably inside that Jackson (Turner has challengingly re tradition which sees the chief end of defined this term) to the DP psychiat s f as being the removal of the reader rist Lindley, to the police-chief- from a known world of empirical experi turned-demagogue Campion, and even to ence in order to return him to that the psychotic clone-progenitor Raft. world with a new objective awareness. So the evidence the reader is given The leading characters of this story, does not in fact allow him to judge in the first interstellar travellers from any substantial way, because he is too Earth, gain their importance from aware of the deceptive nature of the their return rather than their journey source. As I said, each outward. The space voyage is impor narrator's credibility is undercut in tant only insofar as it transforms some way but, at the same time, what them into the standard 'observer' of they say is sometimes to be taken as any utopian or dystopian tale - their an objective and dispassionate account main purpose is not to tell of their of the society they encounter. It is own journey but to report on their en this 'sometimes' that is hard to counter with an Earth which has suf figure out. fered a rich change. Given all this, the extrapolations About the nature of this change, Turner comes up with are extremely Turner is highly ambivalent. Like Le suggestive ones. Quite credibly, he Guin in The Dispossessed, he too is unseats the old bogeyman, the psychi describing an extremely qualified atrist (the mind engineer), and re utopia, if indeed it can be called that places him with the biologist (the at all. Nov; it is, of course, his genetic engineer) and a. new Dr Fran right as novelist to insist on these kenstein is engendered. What makes qualifications (he is not duty-bound it all the worse (as is the case with to give answers to the questions he Dr F) is the inherent idealism of raises), but it is the way he raises these people. Turner puts it so much them that bothers me, and this has to better: do with the (to my mind) weakness of Psychiatric practice taught me the book - the characterisation. long ago that the sentimentalist, SFC 5 5 /5 6 5 *BRG: The two qualities which George Turner shows most obviously are generosity and modesty. When SEC was beginning, George contributed articles to the first issue, and still provides support whenever needed. And...ir George's article, which follows this review, you will find no mention of his own novel, Beloved Son. Yet, in terms of both critical acclaim and financial success, it has been the most successful book of Australian science fiction yet to appear: Britiah hardback and paperback; US paparback; translated editions. Caorgs won’t mention himself, so I'll get in first and praise him. What does it take to become so successful? Look at George's career and you will see: nearly thirty years of published fiction, including one Miles Franklin Award; five years of work spent on Beloved Son itself; twelve years of critical writing about the science fiction field.