DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected European Oil Spill Policies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selected European Oil Spill Policies Chapter 5 Selected European Oil Spill Policies INTRODUCTION authority to use whatever means are deemed most appropriate to fight the spill. Oil that In order to investigate oil spill technologies has reached the shoreline is the responsibility in use abroad and to learn how the United of local authorities. States might benefit from the oil spill experi- For fighting oil spills at sea, the offshore ences and policies of some other countries, area surrounding France has been divided OTA staff visited four countries bordering the into three maritime regions. Oil spill re- North Sea in September, 1989: France, the sponses within each region are directed by the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Nor- responsible Maritime Prefect, a senior Navy way. OTA’s trip was coordinated by the Inter- officer who is also responsible for the defense national Petroleum Industry Environmental of the area.1 The Maritime Prefect’s first pri- Conservation Association and included visits ority is to prevent maritime accidents by en- to a number of government and industry or- forcing navigation regulations. Traffic separa- ganizations in these countries. The four coun- tion lanes have been established in some tries selected represent a wide range of tech- areas, and large, ocean-going tugs are used as nologies and countermeasures policies. Below both “watch dogs” and rescue ships. In the are some of the highlights of our findings. event of a spill, the Maritime Prefect func- tions as onscene commander rather than on- scene coordinator, and hence has considerably FRENCH OIL SPILL POLICY more authority than his U.S. Coast Guard counterpart. (If a similar arrangement were in The French seriously began to consider a effect in the United States, at least 4 “mari- comprehensive approach to fighting oil spills time prefects, ” possibly U.S. Coast Guard offi- in the aftermath of the Torrey Canyon cers, would be required, one each for the East, grounding off England in 1967, but French Gulf, West, and Alaskan coasts). Relatively policy evolved significantly as a consequence minor spills are handled with local equip- of France’s unfortunate experience with the ment. If a spill occurs that is larger than local Amoco Cadiz spill in 1978. This accident, in resources can handle, an offshore marine pol- which approximately 223,000 tons (68 million lution plan, POLMAR MER, is invoked, and gallons) of oil were spilled along the Brittany the Maritime Prefect can then draw on the coast, was about 6.5 times as large as the Ex- equipment and expertise of other regions, xon Valdez spill, making it the fourth largest and, if necessary, of private stocks. in history (table 5-l). Local civil authorities are responsible for Notably, the French have assigned respon- containment and cleanup when an oil spill sibility for fighting oil spills at sea to the reaches or threatens to reach land. Each of French Navy, whose responsibilities are gen- France’s 26 coastal departments (states) pre- erally the equivalent of those of both the U.S. pares its own POLMAR TERRE response Navy and U.S. Coast Guard. Although em- plan, which the prefect (governor) of each de- phasis is placed on spill prevention, once a partment can invoke in the event of a major spill has occurred the French Navy has the threat. The plans identify priority areas to be ‘G. Marchand, G. Bergot, M. Melguen, and G. Peigne, “French Know-How in the Prevention and Fight Against Accidental Oil Spills, ” 1987 Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, Apr. &9, 1987, Baltimore, MD, pp. 15-22. 39 40 . Coping With an Oiled Sea: An Analysis of Oil Spill Response Technologies protected and specify how booms will be in- zation to be an impressive element of its oil stalled in these areas, what public and private spill cleanup plans. There is no comparable equipment is available, and where storage emphasis on defensive beach protection sites and treatment centers for recovered measures in the United States. products are located.2 Small spills are handled Stocks of equipment for fighting offshore by commune officials (mainly by fire depart- ments) with local equipment stocks. The spills are maintained at POLMAR centers in Army may be called for major spills and used Brest, Cherbourg, and Toulon, the headquar- to clean beaches with material and equipment ters of each of the three maritime regions, and from the POLMAR stocks. Having experi- also in Le Havre, Lorient, Port de Bouc, and enced major beach pollution and having rec- Ajaccio. Purchase and maintenance of this ognized that a significant proportion of any equipment is the responsibility of the French major spill may reach the coastline no matter Ministry of Defense. Booms for the protection what measures are taken, the French have put of sensitive nearshore and onshore areas are much effort into research and development of located in eight POLMAR centers around the beach cleaning equipment and into planning country, so that no part of the coastline is fur- and training for beach cleanup. OTA found ther than 250 kilometers from a boom storage French beach cleaning technology and organi- center. Equipment for land cleaning opera- PhoEJ cnxfit Jim Mieh French sand washing machine. 21bid. Chapter 5–Selected European Oil Spill Policies ● 41 tions (e.g., sand washing equipment and hot water pumps) is stationed at two of these eight centers.3 The Secretary of State for the Sea is responsible for the purchase of equip- ment for onshore activities. Unlike the three other countries OTA vis- ited, the French do not rely primarily on one countermeasure technique. Both mechanical equipment and dispersants are at their dis- posal, and the technique or techniques best suited to the circumstances will be employed. While recovery at sea is preferable, the Navy may use dispersants without conferring with others if the spill is seaward of environmen- Ptwfo credit Jim Midke tally sensitive areas (as a rule of thumb, where the water depth is greater than 30 meters). French Egmolap skimmers stockpiled at the POLMAR center in Brest. Egmolap skimmers were used to recover oil French mechanical cleanup equipment is in nearshore areas of Prince William Sound. not radically different from that available in the United States. Some French technology, CEDRE’s missions are spread around various including the Egmolap skimmers successfully U.S. Executive Branch agencies. CEDRE is a used in nearshore operations in Prince Wil- key element in the French oil spill counter- liam Sound, is available in the United States. measures approach. Its existence ensures that Beach cleaning technology (e.g., sand wash- at least some attention is devoted to oil spill ers) is innovative and deserves some attention issues in the sometimes long periods between for use in the United States. Also, the French major spills. have been experimenting with biodegradation accelerating agents. They supplied one of the products (Inipol eap 22) for bioremediation DUTCH OIL SPILL POLICY experiments in Prince William Sound. In the wake of the Amoco Cadiz oil spill the The Dutch rely entirely on mechanical re- French government established CEDRE, the covery for fighting spills as they have no confi- Center for Documentation, Research, and dence in the effectiveness of chemical disper- Experimentation on accidental pollution. sants. The most notable aspect of Dutch Among other things CEDRE advises authori- reliance on mechanical means is their use of ties responsible for pollution control about large dual purpose vessels. Large skimming state-of-the-art techniques, assists and ad- vessels have advantages over small skimmers vises authorities during crises, trains person- because they can simultaneously skim and nel, conducts research to improve existing store much more oil than a small vessel and methods, and tests equipment (including oc- because they can operate in heavier seas. Nev- casional testing in small, deliberate oil spills ertheless, large, dedicated spill vessels are ex- at sea). The organization has a permanent pensive to maintain and operate and slow to staff of 26 and a budget of 10 million francs respond to distant spill sites. The Dutch argue per year. There is no equivalent U.S. organiza- that a large vessel built purely for pollution tion, although counterparts of many of control purposes would be idle for the greater %entre POLMAR de Brest, “The Fight Against Oil Pollution on the Coastline: Missions and Methods of the POLMAR Centers,” May 1987. ——. 42 . Coping With an Oiled Sea: An Analysis of Oil Spill Response Technologies part of its life and is therefore economically The Dutch system is intended (perhaps op- difficult to justify.4 However, vessels that can timistically) to be able to cope with a 30,000 be put to use in periods between oil spills are cubic meter spill (about the size of the Exxon much more attractive. Hopper dredges are es- Valdez spill) in 3 days. Assuming that about pecially suitable for dual use purposes in the 50 percent of a spill evaporates, mechanical Netherlands: the country is small, has a sandy equipment must be able to recover 15,000 cu- coastline, and has significant dredging needs bic meters. In all, 7 units, each unit containing in important ports and waterways. These 200 meters of boom, 2 sweeping arms, a recov- dredges can be equipped with recovery equip- ery vessel, and an assistant vessel, are avail- ment and can hold sizable amounts of recov- able to meet this goal. ered oil. Dredges normally operate in areas where the risk of oil spills is high– the ap- Dual use dredges could prove useful in the proach channels to ports. Moreover, it takes United States. Although no single approach is only a few minutes for a hopper dredge to dis- likely to be the magic solution for all situ- charge its cargo and to be available for spill ations, major port areas where dredges are op- cleanup duties.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benin's Maritime Security Challenges in the Gulf of Guinea
    ISSUE 12 | MAY 2015 West Africa Report Benin’s maritime security challenges in the Gulf of Guinea Summary Benin is confronted with various maritime threats. This includes piracy, which reached a worrying level in 2011. However, the country is now taking steps to preserve its maritime industry; particularly the port of Cotonou, on which the national economy largely depends. The latest initiative is the adoption of a new strategy, which is aimed at improving the coordination of state action at sea. However, the effective implementation of this strategy is a key challenge. Introduction DESPITE A SHORT coastline of 121 km, Benin has a relatively large maritime area that is equivalent to 40% of its land surface. Like many littoral West African countries, Benin derives most of its revenue from its maritime sector, which constitutes more than half of its gross domestic product (GDP).1 This important asset, after having suffered indirectly from the negative impacts of the initially localised piracy along the Nigerian coastline, was then targeted by pirates, armed robbers and illegal fishing vessels. The attacks in Benin’s waters reached alarming levels in 2011 and 2012, when the country recorded 21 cases of piracy,2 making it a high-risk maritime country. As a result of these attacks, as well as those perpetrated in the same period in the maritime areas of Togo, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire and, on a much larger scale, Nigeria, the United Nations (UN) Security Council passed resolutions 2018 (2011) and 2039 (2012) to support the countries bordering the Gulf of Guinea.3 Internationally, these resolutions showed awareness of the extent of maritime insecurity in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • An Example from the Amoco Cadiz Oil Spill
    THE IMPORTANCE OF USING APPROPRIATE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS IN OIL SPILL IMPACT STUDIES: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE AMOCO CADIZ OIL SPILL IMPACT ZONE Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/iosc/article-pdf/1987/1/503/2349658/2169-3358-1987-1-503.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 Edward S. Gilfillan, David S. Page, Barbara Griffin, Sherry A. Hanson, Judith C. Foster Bowdoin College Marine Research Laboratory and Bowdoin College Hydrocarbon Research Center Brunswick, Maine 04011 ABSTRACT: On March 16, 1978, the tanker Amoco Cadiz ran factors as possible in a sampling program to look at oil spill effects. aground off the coast of North Brittany. Her cargo of 221,000 tons of When using non-specific stress responses, it is important to be sure light crude oil was released into the sea. More than 126 miles of coast- just which Stressors are producing any observed responses. Multi- line were oiled, including a number of oyster (Crassostrea gigas j grow- variate statistical methods appear to be useful in associating body ing establishments. The North Brittany coastline already was stressed burdens of multiple Stressors with observed physiological effects. by earlier additions of oil and metals. In a field study by Gilfillan et al.,6 it was shown, using multivariate In December 1979, 21 months after the oil spill, measurements of techniques, that in populations of Mytilus edulis from a moderately glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, aspartate aminotransfer- polluted estuary the animals were responding to Cu, Cr, and Cd at the ase activity, and condition index were made in 14 populations of C.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421
    An Ambiguous Partnership: Great Britain and the Free French Navy, 1940-19421 Hugues Canuel On se souvient aujourd’hui des forces de la France libre en raison de faits d’armes tels que leur courageuse résistance à Bir Hakeim en 1942 et la participation du général Leclerc à la libération de Paris en 1944. Par contre, la contribution antérieure de la marine de la France libre est moins bien connue : elle a donné à de Gaulle, dont l’espoir était alors bien mince, les moyens de mobiliser des appuis politiques au sein de l’empire colonial français et d’apporter une contribution militaire précoce à la cause des Alliés. Cette capacité s’est développée à la suite de l’appui modeste mais tout de même essentiel du Royaume-Uni, un allié qui se méfiait de fournir les ressources absolument nécessaires à une flotte qu’il ne contrôlait pas complètement mais dont les actions pourraient aider la Grande- Bretagne qui se trouvait alors presque seule contre les puissances de l’Axe. Friday 27 November 1942 marked the nadir of French sea power in the twentieth century. Forewarned that German troops arrayed around the Mediterranean base of Toulon were intent on seizing the fleet at dawn, Admiral Jean de Laborde – Commander of the Force de Haute Mer, the High Seas Force – and the local Maritime Prefect, Vice Admiral André Marquis, ordered the immediate scuttling of all ships and submarines at their berths. Some 248,800 tons of capital ships, escorts, auxiliaries and submarines was scuttled as the Wehrmacht closed in on the dockyard.2 The French “Vichy navy” virtually ceased to exist that day.
    [Show full text]
  • States of Emergency
    STATES OF EMERGENCY Technological Failures and Social Destabilization Patrick Lagadec Contents Introduction PART ONE Technical Breakdown, Crisis and Destabilization Framework of Reference 1. The weapons of crisis ........................................................................................ 11 1. An unusual event in a metastable context .......................................................... 12 2. Crisis dynamics................................................................................................... 21 2. Organizations with their backs to the wall...................................................... 23 1. Classic destabilization scenarios ......................................................................... 24 2. Slipping out of control ....................................................................................... 35 PART TWO Technological Crisis and the Actors Involved 3- In the thick of things ....................................................................................... 43 - Marc Becam ....................................................................................................... 45 The oil spill from the "Amoco Cadiz", March - May, 1978 - Richard Thornburgh........................................................................................... 55 Three Mile Island, March - April, 1979 - Douglas K. Burrows .......................................................................................... 66 The great Mississauga evacuation, November 10-16. 1979 - Péter-J.Hargitay ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Reaction and Response
    Volume 3 Issue 2 Article 2 1992 The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Reaction and Response Michael P. Donaldson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael P. Donaldson, The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Reaction and Response, 3 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 283 (1992). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol3/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Donaldson: The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Reaction and Response 19921 THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990: REACTION AND RESPONSE MICHAEL P. DONALDSONt TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................... 283 II. PRE-OPA OIL SPILL LIABILITY ..........................284 III. THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990 .................... 288 IV. PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED APPROACHES ................ 301 A. International Liability and Compensation Conventions ..................................... 301 B. Approaches Suggested by Congress .............. 305 V. CONCERNS AND REACTIONS TO THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990 ............................................. 3 13 A. Reaction by Industry ............................ 313 B. International Reactions .......................... 317 VI. CONCLUSION ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • France and Security Indo Pacific
    COUVASIE2018_DEF-EN copie.pdf 1 09/05/2018 15:51:16 C M FRANCE AND SECURITY J CM IN THE INDOPACIFIC MJ CJ CMJ N Foreword by the Minister for the Armed Forces France pays particular attention to the Indo-Pacific region. Its stability is paramount for international security, as stated in the 2017 Defence and National Security Strategic Review. In the Indo-Pacific area, North Korea challenges the international community by conducting nuclear trials and ballistic missile tests, thereby breaching the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council. The military assertiveness of a growing number of established or emerging powers presents many challenges to multilateralism and increases the instability and unpredictability we are confronted with. Terrorism, which has severely struck Europe over the last few years, is reshaping and spreading to the Indo-Pacific. This worrying evolution requires a joint mobilisation of the international community. The maritime domain remains an area of tensions due to the challenging behaviour of some States with regards to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the persistence of acts of piracy. Finally, the effects of climate change and environmental degradations represent a major issue in the Indo-Pacific, and as far as in the Antarctic, exacerbating security risks. These major challenges can only be overcome through cooperation. Upholding stability in the Indo-Pacific, which is a source of overall prosperity thanks to its economic dynamism, demographic growth and technological innovation, is essential. This has to be set within the framework of an international order based on dialogue and the respect of multilaterally set rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Brittany & Its Byways by Fanny Bury Palliser
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of Brittany & Its Byways by Fanny Bury Palliser This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.guten- berg.org/license Title: Brittany & Its Byways Author: Fanny Bury Palliser Release Date: November 9, 2007 [Ebook 22700] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BRITTANY & ITS BYWAYS*** Brittany & Its Byways by Fanny Bury Palliser Edition 02 , (November 9, 2007) [I] BRITTANY & ITS BYWAYS SOME ACCOUNT OF ITS INHABITANTS AND ITS ANTIQUITIES; DURING A RESIDENCE IN THAT COUNTRY. BY MRS. BURY PALLISER WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS London 1869 Contents Contents. 1 List of Illustrations. 7 Britanny and Its Byways. 11 Some Useful Dates in the History of Brittany. 239 Chronological Table of the Dukes of Brittany. 241 Index. 243 Transcribers' Notes . 255 [III] Contents. CHERBOURG—Mont du Roule—Visit of Queen Victoria—Har- bour, 1—Breakwater—Dock-Yard, 2—Chantereyne—Hôpi- tal de la Marine, 3—Castle—Statue of Napoleon I.—Li- brary—Church of La Trinité, 4—Environs—Octeville, 5—Lace- school of the Sœurs de la Providence, 11. QUERQUEVILLE—Church of St. Germain, 5—Château of the Comte de Tocqueville, 6. TOURLAVILLE—Château, 7—Crêpes, 11. MARTINVAST—Château, 12. BRICQUEBEC—Castle—History, 12—Valognes, 14. ST.SAUVEUR-le-Vicomte—Demesne—History, 15—Cas- tle—Convent—Abbey, 16. PÉRI- ERS, 17—La Haye-du-Puits, 17—Abbey of Lessay—Mode of Washing—Inn-signs, 18—Church, 19.
    [Show full text]
  • French Guiana
    COUNTRY & TERRITORY PROFILES A Summary of Oil Spill Response Arrangements & Resources Worldwide FRENCH GUIANA SPILL NOTIFICATION POINT CROSS AG - MRCC Tel: + 596 596 70 92 92 (24hr) (AG : Antilles – Guyane) Fax: + 596 596 63 24 50 BP 621 - 97261 Fort de France cedex Martinique FWI For spills in port, the relevant port authority should be notified COMPETENT NATIONAL AUTHORITY Officier Operations Marine Tel: +594 594393000(24 hrs) Base Navale Fax: +594 594393005 Dégrad des Cannes In addition, the French Navy continuously monitors the Marine Tel: +594 594395670 Rescue Service Centre Fax: +594 594395589 Incidents in port or port approaches should be reported to: Préfecture - Protection Civile Tel: +594 594394546 Rue Fiedmont +594594394500(24-hrs) 97307 Cayenne Cedex Fax: +594 594 30 02 77 RESPONSE ARRANGEMENTS French Guiana constitutes an overseas administrative unit (Departement d'Outremer) of France headed by a prefect (Préfet de Region) who also acts as the chief executive for maritime affairs (Préfet Maritime) and would oversee any spill response mounted in its waters. Arrangements for response are based on the French POLMAR system - POLMAR-Mer for the maritime regions and POLMAR-Terre for the shoreline which were joined into the “Plan Polmar Guyane” in 2004. The designated agency through which the Prefect may exercise civil authority is the Regional Board for Maritime Affairs (Direction Regionale des Affaires Maritime) whilst his military authority flows through Le Commandant de la Marine (COMAR). In the event of an oil spillage within the jurisdiction of a port or harbour, the port authority would be responsible for overseeing and/or executing anti-pollution measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Amoco Cadi2 Litigation: Summary of the 1988 Court Decision
    Gundlach, E. R. (1989). Amoco Cadiz Litigation: Summary of the 1988 Court Decision. Proceedings of the 1989 Oil Spill Conference, Washington, D.C., American Petroleum Institute. 503-508. AMOCO CADI2 LITIGATION: SUMMARY OF THE 1988 COURT DECISION Erich R. Gundlach E-Tech Inc. 70 Dean Knalcss Drive Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 ABSTRACT: In January 1988, Judge Frank McGarr of the United ment and Quality of Life. The commune consortium rcpmcntd States Dismct Coun in Chicago presented the decision concerning all a total of 90 communes located within, and adjacent to, the spill- claim by the French government, local communes, fisheries groups, affected area. The miscellaneous claim category consisted of &- and other pam'es, concerning the financial liability of the Amoco par- tively small suits brought by certain hotel owners, property owners, ties for damages related to the Amoco Cadi oil spill of March 1978. fishermen, and environmental associations. Several categories of claims, including lost image, lost enjoyment, and ecological &magi were eliminate8 as being uncognizable under French law. Claim for un~aidvolunteers who worked on thes~illwere also eliminated. ~dstothk categories were substantially reduced for a Summary of judgment: Republic of fiance variety of factors including exaggeration, lack of evidence, double billing of certain claims against Amoco Cadiz and the Tanio spill of two The Republic of France claim included a total of eight ministries years later, and the inability to attribute hmage directly to Amoco (Table 1). Claims for the ministries of Defense, Transportation, and Cadiz. Environment and Quality of Life represented more than 85 percent This paper summarizes the major claims and awards, and discusses of the total Republic of France claim and are discussed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Offshore Oil and Gas Development: a Current Awareness Bibliography
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 10-3-1994 Effects of Offshore Oil and Gas Development: A Current Awareness Bibliography Sue Ann Gardner University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] D. Landry LUMCON Marine Center J. Riley LUMCON Marine Center Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Gardner, Sue Ann; Landry, D.; and Riley, J., "Effects of Offshore Oil and Gas Development: A Current Awareness Bibliography" (1994). Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries. 114. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/114 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, UNL Libraries by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Home Site Map & Search Online at http://www.lumcon.edu//library/eoogd/default.asp aphy ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ EFFECTS OF OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT A CURRENT AWARENESS BIBLIOGRAPHY October 1994 This bibliography is a quarterly compilation of current publications (citations with abstracts) from a wide variety of electronic and print information sources relating to offshore oil and gas development. It is compiled and edited by Sue Ann Lewandowski, and is published at the LUMCON Marine Center, 8124 Hwy 56, Chauvin, LA 70344-2124, 985-851-2875, 985- 851-2874 FAX, www.lumcon.edu/library. All inquiries and requests to receive past or future issues of this publication should be directed to the editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Environmental Protection & Safety At
    EU INITIATIVES IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE ERIKA CASUALTY IUMI WORKSHOP ON LIABILITY 12 SEPTEMBER, LONDON WILLEM DE RUITER HEAD, MARITIME SAFETY UNIT EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENERGY & TRANSPORT DG EUROPEAN COMMISSION - ENERGY & TRANSPORT DG - Maritime Safety Unit 1 Seaborne Oil Trade • In 1998 the total crude oil and refined products transported by sea amounted to > 2,000 million tons • The EU oil trade is the largest in the world - crude oil imports represent 27% of total world trade (US 25%) • Oil demand in the EU is around 640 million tons p.a., but approx. 800 million tons p.a. is transported to, from and between EU ports • 90% of the total oil trade with the EU is seaborne EUROPEAN COMMISSION - ENERGY & TRANSPORT DG - Maritime Safety Unit 2 The World Oil Tanker Fleets • The world oil tanker fleet on 1 January 1999 comprised 7,030 ships totaling 289 million tdwt. This represented 38.5% of world merchant tonnage. • The average age of the world tanker fleet in 1999 was 18 years (compared to 16.7 years in1995). • Of the total 1999 fleet, 41% (2,939 ships) were built before 1979, i.e. are now over 20 years old. In tonnage terms these represent 36% of the total tanker tonnage. • The EU registered oil tanker fleet of 855 tankers 9 totaling 43.2 million tdwt represents14.9% of the world total. • but it is estimated that companies established within the EU control about 35% of the world’s oil tanker fleet. EUROPEAN COMMISSION - ENERGY & TRANSPORT DG - Maritime Safety Unit 3 Brief History of Tanker Safety Regulation 1859 Oil Discovered 1861 First Oil Shipped in Barrels 1896 First Bulk Oil Ship (GLUCKAUF) 1926 International Maritime Conference Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Chemical Spills at Sea and Lessons Learnt
    REVIEW OF CHEMICAL SPILLS AT SEA AND LESSONS LEARNT a technical appendix to the INTERSPILL 2009 Conference White Paper “Are HNS spills more dangerous than oil Spills?” compiled by Cedre (1) from Bonn Agreement and Helcom reports and other miscellaneous sources 1 Auhors: Emina Mamaca, Michel Girin, Stéphane le Floch, Rawad el Zir. Contact : [email protected] FOREWORD This appendix to the White Paper cited above was prepared with a view to providing additional background information on existing international experience on the response to HNS spills and the related response tools and techniques. It successively delivers: In Chapter I, a summary of available global information on HNS incidents, with a table of the 47 recorded incidents and their primary causes. In Chapter 2, a review of all 47 incidents, including the risks incurred and the response measures undertaken, followed by a summary of the identified risks to human health and the environment. In Chapter 3, several short case studies of the 24 best‐documented incidents, identified by type of pollutant, with the main lessons learned with regard to the type of pollutant concerned. In Chapter 4, the general lessons learnt with regard to the dangers, consequences and response tips. Cover photo : The chemical tanker Ece sinking in the English Channel in 2000, with a cargo of styrene, methyl‐ethyl‐ketone and phosphoric acid 1. INFORMATION ON INCIDENTS 1.1. Background During the last 30 years, there have been considerable developments in the maritime transport of chemical products, both in bulk and in packaged form. Incidents have followed. Some were well documented, while most remained poorly documented or basically ignored.
    [Show full text]