DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Transport Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Transport Planning Integrated Transport Planning Transport Integrated | August 2021 August Integrated Transport Planning August 2021 Independent assurance report to Parliament 2021–22: 01 Level 31, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne Vic 3000, AUSTRALIA 2021–22: T 03 8601 7000 E [email protected] 01 www.audit.vic.gov.au This report is printed on Monza Recycled paper. Monza Recycled is certified Carbon Neutral by The Carbon Reduction Institute (CRI) in accordance with the global Greenhouse Gas Protocol and ISO 14040 framework. The Lifecycle Analysis for Monza Recycled is cradle to grave including Scopes 1, 2 and 3. It has FSC Mix Certification combined with 99% recycled content. ISBN 9781921060151 Integrated Transport Planning Independent assurance report to Parliament Ordered to be published VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER August 2021 PP no 248, Session 2018–21 The Hon Nazih Elasmar MLC The Hon Colin Brooks MP President Speaker Legislative Council Legislative Assembly Parliament House Parliament House Melbourne Melbourne Dear Presiding Officers Under the provisions of the Audit Act 1994, I transmit my report Integrated Transport Planning. Yours faithfully Dave Barry Acting Auditor-General 4 August 2021 The Victorian Auditor-General’s Office acknowledges Australian Aboriginal peoples as the traditional custodians of the land throughout Victoria. We pay our respect to all Aboriginal communities, their continuing culture and to Elders past, present and emerging. Integrated Transport Planning | Victorian Auditor-General´s Report Contents Audit snapshot ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Audit context ..............................................................................................................................10 1.1 Victoria's transport system and legislation .......................................................................... 11 1.2 Transport planning requirements and guidance .............................................................. 12 1.3 Victoria's published transport plans ........................................................................................ 15 1.4 Changes in institutional arrangements since 2010 .......................................................... 18 1.5 Previous attempts at integration .............................................................................................. 19 1.6 Past VAGO audits of transport planning ............................................................................... 19 2. Transport plans ......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Do transport plans meet legislative requirements? ......................................................... 21 2.2 Absence of a single document .................................................................................................. 23 2.3 Transparency about the transport plan ................................................................................. 24 2.4 The Network Development Strategy ...................................................................................... 26 2.5 DoT's current transport planning work .................................................................................. 28 3. Integration challenges and progress ............................................................................... 34 3.1 Barriers and challenges identified in external reviews .................................................... 35 3.2 Governance and accountability ................................................................................................. 41 3.3 Informing investment priorities ................................................................................................. 45 APPENDIX A. Submissions and comments .............................................................................. 52 APPENDIX B. Acronyms and abbreviations ............................................................................. 57 APPENDIX C. Scope of this audit .................................................................................................. 58 APPENDIX D. Relevant VAGO performance audits since 2010 ........................................ 59 APPENDIX E. DoT's transport plans and strategies ............................................................... 62 Integrated Transport Planning | Victorian Auditor-General´s Report Audit snapshot Is the Department of Transport (DoT) demonstrably integrating its transport planning? Why this audit is important Who and what we However, DoT’s assertion that its 40 separate plans and strategies Transport Integration Act 2010 examined The presently meet the Act's integrated (the Act) requires DoT to prepare We examined whether DoT: transport plan requirements does and periodically revise the transport • not withstand scrutiny. plan for Victoria. meets the Act's requirements for the transport plan The absence of a transport plan The Act seeks integrated planning • is integrating its transport as required by the Act, during and management of the many planning. a decade of unprecedented transport modes, networks and investment in transport services that make up the state's What we concluded infrastructure, creates risks of transport system, so they best meet DoT and its predecessors have not, missed opportunities to sequence user needs. over the past decade, demonstrably and optimise the benefits of these integrated transport planning and investments to best meet Victoria's are yet to meet the Act’s transport needs. requirements for the transport plan. Since DoT’s establishment in 2019 though, it is evidently committed to realising these aims, and is making steady progress towards them. Key facts Source: VAGO from DoT information. 1 | Integrated Transport Planning | Victorian Auditor-General´s Report What we found and recommend We consulted with DoT and considered its views when reaching our conclusions. DoT's full response is in Appendix A. Victoria's Integrated Transport Plan Compliance with the Transport Integration Act 2010 The Act requires DoT to prepare and periodically revise the transport plan for Victoria. It specifies mandatory content and considerations for this plan, as Figure A sets out. Legislative requirements of the transport plan Transport plan requirements specified in section 63 of the Act Sets the planning framework for transport bodies to operate in Sets out the strategic policy context for transport Includes medium- or long-term strategic directions or actions Prepared with regard to the Act’s vision statement, transport system objectives and decision-making principles Prepared with regard to national transport and infrastructure priorities Demonstrates an integrated approach to transport and land-use planning Identifies the challenges the transport plan seeks to address Includes a regularly updated short-term action plan Source: VAGO from the Act. DoT asserted to Parliament and to VAGO that it meets the Act's requirements through multiple plans and strategies taken together, rather than in a single transport An integrated transport system provides users with convenient plan. In advice to the Parliament's Public Accounts and Estimates Committee (PAEC) access to timely, efficient services in June 2019, DoT listed 11 published documents as evidence of its integrated that are coordinated and linked within and across transport modes transport planning work, and as part of the transport plan required by the Act. for seamless and reliable end-to-end journeys. 2 | Integrated Transport Planning | Victorian Auditor-General´s Report We assessed these 11 published documents and a further 21 documents that DoT identifies as part of the transport plan against the specific requirements of section 63 of the Act. The documents we assessed comprise: • two broad whole-of-government plans relevant for transport: Plan Melbourne, Metropolitan Planning Strategy (2017) and the Victorian Infrastructure Plan (2017) • 18 plans for specific transport modes including train, tram, bus, road and cycling • nine location-specific plans covering regional Victoria and two of six metropolitan Melbourne sub-regions • three miscellaneous plans and strategies. We could not assess more than 10 other plans and strategies DoT identifies as part of the transport plan as it is yet to finalise them. The documents DoT identifies as comprising the transport plan do not fully meet legislative requirements. This collection of documents does not provide a coherent and comprehensive transport plan because: • the plans have been developed over a nine-year period and do not explain or demonstrate how they are part of a collection of documents that form the transport plan as required by the Act, or how they are related to, link with, or build on other plans • the collection is yet to include completed plans that address all areas of Victoria and all transport modes • modal plans were largely developed before, rather than after, area-based plans, which runs counter to integrated planning principles and is inconsistent with A modal plan is a plan for a particular mode of transport, while national transport planning guidance an area-based plan should • individual plans are highly varied in detail and focus, ranging from high-level consider all modes of transport in a certain area. strategies to single-mode or location-based plans and policy documents communicating initiatives underway or committed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Victorian Transport Plan and Melbourne's Population Boom
    N e w s Public Transport Users Association www.ptua.org.au ISSN 0817–0347 Volume 33 No. 5 December 2009 The Victorian Transport Plan and Melbourne's Population Boom It has taken barely two years for one of the biggest shifts in trains, and not a broader vision to make our transport sus- the Victorian public transport debate to occur. tainable. Sure enough, much of our population growth is to As recently as 2007, the State government was shoring up be accommodated in new suburbs on Melbourne’s fringe, ar- its opposition to public transport expansion with a do-little eas which the VTP says are to be provided with new motor- plan—Meeting Our Transport Challenges—that was chiefly ways on the one hand, and hourly bus services on the other. about hosing down expectations of major public transport Clearly, ongoing car dependence for the vast majority of Mel- improvements. The attitude of the government was most burnians is “all part of the plan”: not just today but also in clearly expressed by Director of Public Transport Jim Betts 2030, and indeed in 2100 if the laws of physics permit. in a widely-reported statement in October 2005, that there The good news, however, is that desire for better public trans- was no intention to build any new urban rail lines in the next port, and awareness of the need to change old habits, is not decade. So, while the ‘MOTC’ plan released in 2006 did restricted to peak-hour commuters. This attitude shift has promise new orbital bus routes and some catch-up work on not yet bitten the government, which has yet to sustain polit- the existing rail system, there were few actual additions to ical damage on this wider front, thanks to its ability to hold public transport services.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting
    Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday 13 August 2019 Hobsons Bay City Council 13 August 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes THE COUNCIL’S MISSION We will listen, engage and work with our community to plan, deliver and advocate for Hobsons Bay to secure a happy, healthy, fair and sustainable future for all. OUR VALUES Respectful Community driven and focused Trusted and reliable Efficient and responsible Bold and innovative Accountable and transparent Recognised Council acknowledges the peoples of the Kulin nation as the Traditional Owners of these municipal lands and waterways, and pay our respects to Elders past and present. Chairperson: Cr Jonathon Marsden (Mayor) Strand Ward Councillors: Cr Angela Altair Strand Ward Cr Peter Hemphill Strand Ward Cr Tony Briffa Cherry Lake Ward Cr Sandra Wilson Cherry Lake Ward Cr Colleen Gates Wetlands Ward Cr Michael Grech (Deputy Mayor) Wetlands Ward Aaron van Egmond Chief Executive Officer Hobsons Bay City Council Hobsons Bay City Council 13 August 2019 Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes CONTENTS 1 Council Welcome ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Apologies ........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Disclosure of Interests ................................................................................................... 3 4 Minutes Confirmation ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne) Annual Report 2017-18
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne) Street address Level 5, 530 Collins Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Postal address GPO Box 261 Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia Tel: +61 3 8347 8300 Fax: +61 3 8347 8301 www.vicports.vic.gov.au Annual Report Ports Corporation (Melbourne) 2017-18 Victorian Authorised by the Victorian Government. This publication is produced by Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne). Proudly designed and produced by abCreative productions www.abCreative.com Printed on 100% recycled paper. Responsible Body’s declaration The Hon. Luke Donnellan MP Minister for Ports 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 The Hon. Tim Pallas MP Treasurer 1 Treasury Place East Melbourne Victoria 3002 Dear Ministers, Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne) 2017-18 Annual Report I have much pleasure in submitting to you the Annual Report of Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne) for the period 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018, in accordance with the provisions of the Transport Integration Act 2010 (Vic) and the Financial Management Act 1994 (Vic). Yours sincerely, James Cain Chairman 29 August 2018 Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne) 2017-18 Annual Report 1 2 Victorian Ports Corporation (Melbourne) 2017-18 Annual Report Contents Responsible Body’s declaration 1 Section 1: Year in review 5 From the Chairman 6 From the Chief Executive Officer 7 Mission, vision and values 8 An overview of VPCM 9 Manner of establishment 9 Purpose and responsibilities 9 Functions, objects and powers 10 Significant legislative changes
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT Accessibility 2017 – 2018 If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, such as large print or audio, phone 03 9619 5958 or email [email protected] Unless indicated otherwise, this work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au It is a condition of this Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence that you must give credit to the original author who is the State of Victoria. ANNUAL REPORT 2017 – 2018 – 2017 REPORT ANNUAL V/LINE Authorised by Transport for Victoria, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne. MSR01744 Annual Report 2017-18_4pp Cover.indd 1 3/12/2018 3:24 PM V/Line Corporation ABN 91 273 289 190 GPO Box 5343 Melbourne VIC 3001 Head Office / Administration Level 9, 750 Collins Street Docklands VIC 3008 Telephone (03) 9619 5900 Facsimile (03) 9619 5000 vline.com.au Customer information, reservations, sales and feedback Freecall 1800 800 007 Project team Rebecca Northeast Scheree Mularczyk Les Lovell Denis Grigolato Printed by Finsbury Green, Port Melbourne. MSR01744 Annual Report 2017-18_4pp Cover.indd 2 3/12/2018 3:24 PM Table of Contents Responsible Body’s declaration 2 Section One: Year in review 3 Section Two: Governance and organisational structure 21 Section Three: Workforce data 31 Section Four: Other disclosures 39 Financial Statements 57 Disclosure Index 134 MSR01744 Annual Report 2017-18_2.indd 1 3/12/2018 3:40 PM 2 V/Line | Annual Report | 2017 – 2018 Responsible Body’s declaration 4 September 2018 The Hon Jacinta Allan MP Minister for Public Transport Level 20, 1 Spring Street Melbourne VIC 3000 The Hon Tim Pallas MP Treasurer Level 4, 1 Treasury Place East Melbourne VIC 3002 Dear Ministers In accordance with the Financial Management Act 1994, I am pleased to present the Annual Report of V/Line Corporation (and its subsidiary V/Line Pty Ltd) for the year ending 30 June 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 04 PRODUCTIVITY the Western Metro Region Has a Legacy of Transport, Logistics and Manufacturing Industries
    CHAPTER 04 PRODUCTIVITY The Western Metro Region has a legacy of transport, logistics and manufacturing industries. It continues to be home to significant areas of unfragmented industrial land, Plan Melbourne Outcome 1: including the Western Industrial Melbourne is a productive Precinct which is one of the largest city that attracts investment, state-significant industrial precincts supports innovation and creates (SSIPs) in metropolitan Melbourne. jobs The considerable amount of unfragmented industrial land in the region is an advantage. 17 DRAFT WESTERN METRO LAND USE FRAMEWORK PLAN Complementing industrial land and activity, are • State-significant health and/or education the Sunshine and Werribee National Employment precincts at Footscray Hospital (known as and Innovation Clusters (NEICs), which include Western Hospital in Plan Melbourne), Victoria major education and health precincts, a network University (Footscray), Sunshine Hospital and of activity centres and access to extensive air, road Victorian University Precinct (St Albans), and rail infrastructure, reaching local, regional, Werribee Health and Education Precinct, Melton interstate and international markets. Health and Victoria University (Sunshine) Key transport gateways in the Western Metro • A network of 25 existing and five future major Region include the Melbourne Airport, Avalon activity centres that are based around larger Airport and Australia’s busiest container port, freestanding shopping centres and strip-based the Port of Melbourne. Further investment in road centres that vary in size, role and function and rail infrastructure such as the Melbourne • Western Growth Corridor consisting of growth Airport Rail, SRL, the proposed Outer Metropolitan areas in Wyndham and Melton Ring/E6 Transport Corridor (OMR), the proposed • Significant waste and recovery facilities including Western Interstate Freight Terminal (WIFT) and the Melbourne Regional Landfill at Ravenhall, the potential Bay West container port will further Western Treatment Plant, and the Werribee enhance transport connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service Reform in Melbourne – the Last 5 Years Peter Parker
    Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University World Transit Research World Transit Research 9-1-2011 Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker Follow this and additional works at: http://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research Recommended Citation Parker, P. (2011). Bus service reform in Melbourne - the last 5 years. Conference paper delivered at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) Proceedings held on 28 - 30 September 2011 in Adelaide, Australia. This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by World Transit Research. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Transit Research by an authorized administrator of World Transit Research. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 28 – 30 September 2011, Adelaide, Australia Publications website: www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker1 1 Metlink Melbourne, Level 8, 575 Bourke Street, Melbourne, 3000 Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract After fifteen years of little change, Melbourne’s bus services have altered significantly in the last five years. Underpinned by policy that supports greater public transport use, reform was driven by three major government programs; SmartBus, minimum standards upgrades and local area service reviews. This paper briefly compares the distribution of each service initiative. Minimum standards upgrades were most widespread, benefiting many middle and outer suburbs. Middle suburbs gained most from SmartBus, especially the City of Manningham where it operates on city as well as orbital routes. And the service reviews were most influential in fringe areas to the west, north and south east.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria's Project Prioritisation Submission to Infrastructure Australia
    2008 VICTORIA’S PROJECT PRIORITISATION SUBMISSION TO INFRASTRUCTURE AUSTRALIA Published by State of Victoria www.vic.gov.au © State Government of Victoria 31 October 2008 Authorised by the Victorian Government, Melbourne. Printed by Impact Digital, Units 3-4 306 Albert Street, Brunswick VIC 3056. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Victoria Supports the Commonwealth’s Five Key 4 Platforms for Productivity Growth 3. Victoria’s Leading Role in the National Economy 6 4. Transport Challenge Facing Victoria 8 5. Victoria’s Record in Regulatory and Investment Reform 12 6. Victoria’s Strategic Priority Project Packages 14 7. Linkages Table 28 8. Indicative Construction Sequencing 30 Victoria’s Project Prioritisation Submission to Infrastructure Australia 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 AUDIT SUBMISSION These projects will help build Victoria lodged its submission to the National Infrastructure Audit with Infrastructure a stronger, more resilient, and Australia (IA) on 30 June 2008. The Audit Submission provided a strategic overview of sustainable national economy, Victoria’s infrastructure needs in the areas of land transport, water, sea ports, airports, energy and telecommunications. It detailed the key infrastructure bottlenecks and able to capture new trade constraints that need to be addressed to optimise Victoria’s and Australia’s future opportunities and reduce productivity growth. greenhouse gas emissions. Following the lodgement of Victoria’s submission, IA wrote to all States and Territories requesting further input on ‘Problem and Solution Assessment.’ In response to this request, the Victorian Government gave IA offi cials a detailed briefi ng and background paper in September 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy Refresh
    Transport Strategy refresh Background paper Public Transport Network March 2018 Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) 1 This report has been prepared by Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) and Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) as independent advice for the City of Melbourne. The aim of the report is to encourage public conversation and to inform the City of Melbourne’s forthcoming Transport Strategy refresh. 2 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current performance ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Mode share ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Overcrowding ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Reliability and speed ..................................................................................................................... 9 3. Better public transport for the City of Melbourne: Key issues in brief ............................................... 10 4. Public transport issues & options ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Significant growth is expected in public transport demand ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 34A. North East Link Project
    NORTH EAST LINK INQUIRY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF THE NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF DRAFT AMENDMENT GC98 TO THE BANYULE, MANNINGHAM, BOROONDARA, YARRA, WHITEHORSE, WHITTLESEA AND NILLUMBIK PLANNING SCHEMES IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKS APPROVAL APPLICATION MADE IN RESPECT OF THE NORTH EAST LINK TUNNEL VENTILATION SYSTEM SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT PART A 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Outline ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Part 1: Overview ............................................................................................................................ 4 The Project’s Environmental Effects .......................................................................................... 4 The Assessment Approach Adopted in the EES ......................................................................... 8 The Reference Project and the Consideration of Alternative Design Options ............................ 9 The Proposed Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................... 12 Stakeholder Consultation and Ongoing Engagement ................................................................ 14 Part 2: The Project ...................................................................................................................... 15 The Project’s Rationale ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submission: Inquiry Into the Investment of Commonwealth And
    land useuse----transporttransport integration in melbourne as if 20/2020 mattered Submission by Dr Jan Scheurer, RMIT-AHURI Research Centre, RMIT University to Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee – Public Transport Inquiry March 2009 background Melbourne’s public transport network faces a fundamental challenge. After 25 years of stagnating demand, 1 there is now substantial growth in the number of passengers using the network. 2 This trend has a number of causes. These range from growing traffic congestion, rising petrol prices, increasing activities in Melbourne’s inner suburbs and rail corridors, to greater awareness of the long-term social, economic and environmental wellbeing of the city. In 2002, the Victorian Government set a policy goal to increase the proportion of public transport out of all motorised trips made within metropolitan Melbourne from 9 percent in 2001 to 20 percent in 2020 (the ‘20/2020 goal’). 3 Allowing for population growth, this is an increase in the absolute number of public transport trips by a factor of 2-3, or from 370 million trips in 2004/05 to more than 1 billion per year by 2020. In the early years since the Melbourne 2030 strategy, work to achieve this goal concentrated on soft measures such as TravelSmart programs for residential communities and businesses, improved passenger information systems and modernisation of station facilities and rolling stock. But in the face of unprecedented growth in passenger numbers and resulting congestion effect on a network not structurally equipped for the task, it has now become obvious that hard measures are needed as well.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 258 Wednesday 26 June 2019 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Transport Integration Act 2010 TRANSPORT RESTRUCTURING ORDER (ROADS CORPORATION) NO. 1/2019 Order in Council This Order may be cited as the Transport Restructuring Order (Roads Corporation) No. 1/2019. The Governor in Council under Division 2 of Part 4A of the Transport Integration Act 2010 orders that: 1. Commencement This Order comes into operation on 1 July 2019. 2. Definitions 2.1 In this Order – ‘conferred functions’ means the functions conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria by paragraph 3 of this Order. 2.2 Terms used in this Order have the same meaning as that term has in the Transport Integration Act 2010, unless the context otherwise requires. 3. Conferred functions The functions specified in Part A of Schedule 1 are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria. 4. Ongoing and concurrent conferral 4.1 The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria on an ongoing basis. 4.2 The conferred functions are to be performed or exercised concurrently by the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation (meaning that each of the Head, Transport for Victoria and the Roads Corporation may exercise the functions independently of the other). 5. Effect of conferral on the Head, Transport for Victoria The conferred functions are conferred on the Head, Transport for Victoria only to the extent that the exercise or performance of the function does not require the exercise of a function, power or duty conferred exclusively on another person or body by or under another Act.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Link Project Environment Effects Statement
    North East Link Project Environment Effects Statement Submission No. 709 Presentation to Inquiry and Advisory Committee Hearing Marianne Richards, President 9 September 2019 Town & Country Planning Association Inc. (TCPA) • Established in 1914 as the Victorian Town Planning and Parks Association – To give the town a bit of the country, and the country a bit of the town, to secure better housing, to protect existing parks, to safeguard native animals and plants and to erect memorials to explorers • TCPA advocates integrated planning of land use and transport for ecological sustainability and a healthy living environment – Processes that respond to the needs and views of the community and that provide for public participation and on-going scrutiny at all stages. • Awards the Sir James Barrett Memorial Medal to recognise the best contribution each year to town planning 2 TCPA activities • TCPA submissions on urban planning matters include – House of Representatives Standing Committee on Infrastructure, Transport and Cities Inquiry into the Australian Government’s role in the development of cities, July 2017 – City of Melbourne, Draft Transport Strategy 2030, June 2019 • TCPA advocacy has evolved and grown since 1960s – 1960s: Preservation of the Yarra Valley – 1970s: More pro-public transport and anti-roads – 1980s: Actively promoting bicycle paths – 1990s: Sustainability; Need for integrated land use and transport planning across the state – 2000s: Walking and cycling to maintain health → older age cohort • TCPA support for research on
    [Show full text]