DOCSLIB.ORG

The Victorian Transport Plan and Melbourne's Population Boom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Victorian Transport Plan and Melbourne's Population Boom N e w s Public Transport Users Association www.ptua.org.au ISSN 0817–0347 Volume 33 No. 5 December 2009 The Victorian Transport Plan and Melbourne's Population Boom It has taken barely two years for one of the biggest shifts in trains, and not a broader vision to make our transport sus- the Victorian public transport debate to occur. tainable. Sure enough, much of our population growth is to As recently as 2007, the State government was shoring up be accommodated in new suburbs on Melbourne’s fringe, ar- its opposition to public transport expansion with a do-little eas which the VTP says are to be provided with new motor- plan—Meeting Our Transport Challenges—that was chiefly ways on the one hand, and hourly bus services on the other. about hosing down expectations of major public transport Clearly, ongoing car dependence for the vast majority of Mel- improvements. The attitude of the government was most burnians is “all part of the plan”: not just today but also in clearly expressed by Director of Public Transport Jim Betts 2030, and indeed in 2100 if the laws of physics permit. in a widely-reported statement in October 2005, that there The good news, however, is that desire for better public trans- was no intention to build any new urban rail lines in the next port, and awareness of the need to change old habits, is not decade. So, while the ‘MOTC’ plan released in 2006 did restricted to peak-hour commuters. This attitude shift has promise new orbital bus routes and some catch-up work on not yet bitten the government, which has yet to sustain polit- the existing rail system, there were few actual additions to ical damage on this wider front, thanks to its ability to hold public transport services. expectations at a miserably low level. But next year’s State Since 2007, however, the government has been seriously election will be the first to take place in this new ‘growth wrong-footed by train and tram patronage growth that it did era’ for public transport. Voters, many of whom have lived not expect, did not plan for, and in fact actively planned in other places and know good public transport when they against (by scrapping surplus Hitachi trains and Z class trams see it, will not let do-little bureaucrats and politicians off the between 2001 and 2005). Faced with substantial political hook forever. damage at the hands of angry commuters, the government has Shoring up car use on the Peninsula =) Page6 had to rethink—if ever so slightly—its stance against service expansion. The Victorian Transport Plan, released in Jan- In this issue uary this year, was its response. Outwardly, it signalled a new era of major rail construction and expansion of service. Victorian Transport Plan, one year on....... 1 Keeping in touch................... 2 Yet behind the spin and glamour of its big project announce- AGM report...................... 2 ments, the old do-little attitude remains. The main benefi- Members' meeting.................. 2 ciaries of the big projects are peak-hour commuters to the Climate action heats up............... 3 CBD—the one ‘market segment’ where the mode-share bat- Summer trains..................... 3 tle is already won. Virtually nothing is said about boosting Clearways vs. real tram priority........... 4 off-peak services, or improving the network that connects Myki update...................... 5 people to places other than the city centre. One of the orbital Buy another ticket.................. 5 Smartbus routes promised in MOTC in 2006 has been qui- Periodicals left for dead............... 5 etly cancelled, and another shortened. And six months after Geelong branch.................... 6 the Regional Rail Link gained Federal funding, its supposed Frankston / Peninsula campaign........... 6 users still do not know how it is supposed to operate. In brief......................... 6 Recently, a new dimension has been added to the debate: the Henry Tax Review.................. 7 question of how to accommodate the huge forecast growth in Movember at the PTUA............... 7 Melbourne’s population. But it is this question that reveals Volunteers sought.................. 7 how limited the ‘VTP’ really is—that it’s really just a polit- ical response to angry peak-hour commuters in overcrowded PTUA News—December 2009—Page 1 Keeping in touch: Committee Member Meetings Daniel Bowen—President Melbourne PTUA Office Tony Morton—Secretary Dates / times as advised Ross House Kerryn Wilmot—Treasurer Ross House 247 Flinders Lane, Melbourne Michael Galea 247 Flinders Lane, City Telephone (03) 9650 7898 Ian Hundley More details: see below Email: [email protected] Mark Johnson Eastern Suburbs Membership Enquiries Jason King Third Tuesday of every month, 7pm Call or email the office (see above). Tim Long ‘The Barn’ (behind Box Hill Baptist Rob Meredith Church) Commuter Club Tim Petersen PTUA members can obtain cheap 3 Ellingworth Parade (off Station St) David Robertson Box Hill yearly Metcards. See www.ptua. Vaughan Williams org.au/members/offers. Geelong Branch convenors Internet First Saturday of every month (except Paul Westcott—Geelong Jan), 10:30am Our website is at www.ptua.org.au. Jeremy Lunn—Eastern Suburbs The PTUA runs email lists for mem- Multimedia Room ber discussions, and to stay up to date Courthouse Youth Arts Centre with PTUA events. Members can Contact Corner Gheringhap and Little Malop also view archived newsletters online. All committee members can be Streets, Geelong See: www.ptua.org.au/members/ emailed using the format firstname. resources. [email protected]. PTUA Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting of the members (listed above), Paul Westcott PTUA took place at Ross House on will continue as convenor of the Gee- Members' Monday 9 November. The highlight long Branch, and Jeremy Lunn will con- meeting: of the meeting was a video montage of tine to convene our Eastern Suburbs news clips and other media coverage of branch. 14 December the PTUA’s activities. Members were Following the formal business of the Our final members’ meeting for the invited to count the number of times the AGM, there was a period of general year takes place on Monday 14 De- ‘Myki machine falls apart’ clip was re- discussion in which the Committee an- cember, at 6pm at Ross House. In used in the year’s news bulletins! swered questions from members. Most keeping with the spirit of the season As the number of nominations for member questions focussed on the new there will be light refreshments, and PTUA Committee was equal to the Myki system, about which there is the opportunity to discuss issues of number of positions available, there clearly a lot of uncertainty—see articles concern to members. was no election held this year. The on page5 of this issue. Meetings are open to PTUA financial Committee welcomed two new mem- members only, but we encourage you bers, Michael Galea and Ian Hundley, Ample finger food and drinks rounded to bring a friend and sign them up on and farewelled retiring members Myles out the evening. Many thanks to our the night! Green, Bronwen Merner and Fiona Rae. dedicated Committee caterers for help- The meeting schedule will be chang- ing make this a success. ing for 2010: more details next issue. In addition to the elected Committee PTUA News—December 2009—Page 2 Climate action heats up A few short days after this newsletter is and internationally. Kevin Rudd was tile Senate. On one hand the Greens of- published, world leaders will gather in named personally by the G77 group of fered to support the bill provided that Copenhagen to thrash out a new global developing nations who criticised the emission targets were strengthened to agreement to curb greenhouse gas emis- failure of developed nations to commit bring them into line with those recom- sions. At the time of writing, expecta- to an emissions reduction target “that mended by scientists. On the other tions are being actively managed down- saves the world,”—that is, at least 40% hand, those Liberals who want a CPRS wards, with leaders at the recent APEC below 1990 levels by 2020. at all have demanded additional com- meeting in Singapore suggesting only pensation for polluting industries (on Australia’s ‘unconditional’ offer of only a “political agreement” many emerge top of proposed reductions in fuel ex- 5% compares very poorly to pledges of from Copenhagen, with legally-binding cise) and a permanent exemption for up to 40% by 2020 by European nations details to follow in 2010—perhaps. agriculture. The Nationals, and many such as Norway. Meanwhile, our ‘con- Liberal Senators, continue to show lit- According to some commentators, fail- ditional’ offer of up to 25% contains so tle inclination to support the CPRS in ure to conclude a binding agreement many escape clauses that many analysts any form. Amid the farce playing out in in December 2009 may be a blessing suggest it is meaningless. For example, Canberra, science-based targets seem to in disguise. Author of the landmark the offer is conditional upon (among be all but forgotten. 2006 report for the British government other things) “global action which mo- on the economics of climate change, bilises greater financial resources;” yet Australians who are concerned Nicholas Stern, told the Financial Times development agencies such as Oxfam about the lack of commitment to that he would “much prefer a frame- accuse the Australian government itself ensuring a safe climate will have work that had to be filled in [next year] of holding back on financing climate an opportunity to show their frus- than something agreed with weak tar- change adaptation in developing coun- tration at the Walk against Warm- gets that would be difficult to unravel.” tries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Transport Planning
    Integrated Transport Planning Transport Integrated | August 2021 August Integrated Transport Planning August 2021 Independent assurance report to Parliament 2021–22: 01 Level 31, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne Vic 3000, AUSTRALIA 2021–22: T 03 8601 7000 E [email protected] 01 www.audit.vic.gov.au This report is printed on Monza Recycled paper. Monza Recycled is certified Carbon Neutral by The Carbon Reduction Institute (CRI) in accordance with the global Greenhouse Gas Protocol and ISO 14040 framework. The Lifecycle Analysis for Monza Recycled is cradle to grave including Scopes 1, 2 and 3. It has FSC Mix Certification combined with 99% recycled content. ISBN 9781921060151 Integrated Transport Planning Independent assurance report to Parliament Ordered to be published VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER August 2021 PP no 248, Session 2018–21 The Hon Nazih Elasmar MLC The Hon Colin Brooks MP President Speaker Legislative Council Legislative Assembly Parliament House Parliament House Melbourne Melbourne Dear Presiding Officers Under the provisions of the Audit Act 1994, I transmit my report Integrated Transport Planning. Yours faithfully Dave Barry Acting Auditor-General 4 August 2021 The Victorian Auditor-General’s Office acknowledges Australian Aboriginal peoples as the traditional custodians of the land throughout Victoria. We pay our respect to all Aboriginal communities, their continuing culture and to Elders past, present and emerging. Integrated Transport Planning | Victorian Auditor-General´s Report Contents Audit snapshot .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service Reform in Melbourne – the Last 5 Years Peter Parker
    Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University World Transit Research World Transit Research 9-1-2011 Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker Follow this and additional works at: http://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research Recommended Citation Parker, P. (2011). Bus service reform in Melbourne - the last 5 years. Conference paper delivered at the 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) Proceedings held on 28 - 30 September 2011 in Adelaide, Australia. This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by World Transit Research. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Transit Research by an authorized administrator of World Transit Research. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 28 – 30 September 2011, Adelaide, Australia Publications website: www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx Bus service reform in Melbourne – the last 5 years Peter Parker1 1 Metlink Melbourne, Level 8, 575 Bourke Street, Melbourne, 3000 Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract After fifteen years of little change, Melbourne’s bus services have altered significantly in the last five years. Underpinned by policy that supports greater public transport use, reform was driven by three major government programs; SmartBus, minimum standards upgrades and local area service reviews. This paper briefly compares the distribution of each service initiative. Minimum standards upgrades were most widespread, benefiting many middle and outer suburbs. Middle suburbs gained most from SmartBus, especially the City of Manningham where it operates on city as well as orbital routes. And the service reviews were most influential in fringe areas to the west, north and south east.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria's Project Prioritisation Submission to Infrastructure Australia
    2008 VICTORIA’S PROJECT PRIORITISATION SUBMISSION TO INFRASTRUCTURE AUSTRALIA Published by State of Victoria www.vic.gov.au © State Government of Victoria 31 October 2008 Authorised by the Victorian Government, Melbourne. Printed by Impact Digital, Units 3-4 306 Albert Street, Brunswick VIC 3056. This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Victoria Supports the Commonwealth’s Five Key 4 Platforms for Productivity Growth 3. Victoria’s Leading Role in the National Economy 6 4. Transport Challenge Facing Victoria 8 5. Victoria’s Record in Regulatory and Investment Reform 12 6. Victoria’s Strategic Priority Project Packages 14 7. Linkages Table 28 8. Indicative Construction Sequencing 30 Victoria’s Project Prioritisation Submission to Infrastructure Australia 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 AUDIT SUBMISSION These projects will help build Victoria lodged its submission to the National Infrastructure Audit with Infrastructure a stronger, more resilient, and Australia (IA) on 30 June 2008. The Audit Submission provided a strategic overview of sustainable national economy, Victoria’s infrastructure needs in the areas of land transport, water, sea ports, airports, energy and telecommunications. It detailed the key infrastructure bottlenecks and able to capture new trade constraints that need to be addressed to optimise Victoria’s and Australia’s future opportunities and reduce productivity growth. greenhouse gas emissions. Following the lodgement of Victoria’s submission, IA wrote to all States and Territories requesting further input on ‘Problem and Solution Assessment.’ In response to this request, the Victorian Government gave IA offi cials a detailed briefi ng and background paper in September 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy Refresh
    Transport Strategy refresh Background paper Public Transport Network March 2018 Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) 1 This report has been prepared by Dr John Stone (University of Melbourne) and Dr Ian Woodcock (RMIT) as independent advice for the City of Melbourne. The aim of the report is to encourage public conversation and to inform the City of Melbourne’s forthcoming Transport Strategy refresh. 2 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Current performance ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Mode share ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Overcrowding ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.3. Reliability and speed ..................................................................................................................... 9 3. Better public transport for the City of Melbourne: Key issues in brief ............................................... 10 4. Public transport issues & options ...................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Significant growth is expected in public transport demand ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 34A. North East Link Project
    NORTH EAST LINK INQUIRY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF THE NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF DRAFT AMENDMENT GC98 TO THE BANYULE, MANNINGHAM, BOROONDARA, YARRA, WHITEHORSE, WHITTLESEA AND NILLUMBIK PLANNING SCHEMES IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKS APPROVAL APPLICATION MADE IN RESPECT OF THE NORTH EAST LINK TUNNEL VENTILATION SYSTEM SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT PART A 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Outline ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Part 1: Overview ............................................................................................................................ 4 The Project’s Environmental Effects .......................................................................................... 4 The Assessment Approach Adopted in the EES ......................................................................... 8 The Reference Project and the Consideration of Alternative Design Options ............................ 9 The Proposed Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................... 12 Stakeholder Consultation and Ongoing Engagement ................................................................ 14 Part 2: The Project ...................................................................................................................... 15 The Project’s Rationale ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submission: Inquiry Into the Investment of Commonwealth And
    land useuse----transporttransport integration in melbourne as if 20/2020 mattered Submission by Dr Jan Scheurer, RMIT-AHURI Research Centre, RMIT University to Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee – Public Transport Inquiry March 2009 background Melbourne’s public transport network faces a fundamental challenge. After 25 years of stagnating demand, 1 there is now substantial growth in the number of passengers using the network. 2 This trend has a number of causes. These range from growing traffic congestion, rising petrol prices, increasing activities in Melbourne’s inner suburbs and rail corridors, to greater awareness of the long-term social, economic and environmental wellbeing of the city. In 2002, the Victorian Government set a policy goal to increase the proportion of public transport out of all motorised trips made within metropolitan Melbourne from 9 percent in 2001 to 20 percent in 2020 (the ‘20/2020 goal’). 3 Allowing for population growth, this is an increase in the absolute number of public transport trips by a factor of 2-3, or from 370 million trips in 2004/05 to more than 1 billion per year by 2020. In the early years since the Melbourne 2030 strategy, work to achieve this goal concentrated on soft measures such as TravelSmart programs for residential communities and businesses, improved passenger information systems and modernisation of station facilities and rolling stock. But in the face of unprecedented growth in passenger numbers and resulting congestion effect on a network not structurally equipped for the task, it has now become obvious that hard measures are needed as well.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Link Project Environment Effects Statement
    North East Link Project Environment Effects Statement Submission No. 709 Presentation to Inquiry and Advisory Committee Hearing Marianne Richards, President 9 September 2019 Town & Country Planning Association Inc. (TCPA) • Established in 1914 as the Victorian Town Planning and Parks Association – To give the town a bit of the country, and the country a bit of the town, to secure better housing, to protect existing parks, to safeguard native animals and plants and to erect memorials to explorers • TCPA advocates integrated planning of land use and transport for ecological sustainability and a healthy living environment – Processes that respond to the needs and views of the community and that provide for public participation and on-going scrutiny at all stages. • Awards the Sir James Barrett Memorial Medal to recognise the best contribution each year to town planning 2 TCPA activities • TCPA submissions on urban planning matters include – House of Representatives Standing Committee on Infrastructure, Transport and Cities Inquiry into the Australian Government’s role in the development of cities, July 2017 – City of Melbourne, Draft Transport Strategy 2030, June 2019 • TCPA advocacy has evolved and grown since 1960s – 1960s: Preservation of the Yarra Valley – 1970s: More pro-public transport and anti-roads – 1980s: Actively promoting bicycle paths – 1990s: Sustainability; Need for integrated land use and transport planning across the state – 2000s: Walking and cycling to maintain health → older age cohort • TCPA support for research on
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Over a New Franchise: Assessing the Current Health of Public Transport Management in Melbourne Dr John Stone
    Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University World Transit Research World Transit Research 1-1-2010 Turning over a new franchise: assessing the current health of public transport management in Melbourne Dr John Stone Follow this and additional works at: http://www.worldtransitresearch.info/research Recommended Citation Stone, J. (2010). Turning over a new franchise: assessing the current health of public transport management in Melbourne. Paper delivered at the 33rd Australasian Transport Research Forum Conference held in Canberra, on 29 September - 1 October, 2010. This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by World Transit Research. It has been accepted for inclusion in World Transit Research by an authorized administrator of World Transit Research. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2010 Proceedings 29 September – 1 October 2010, Canberra, Australia Publication website: http://www.patrec.org/atrf.aspx Turning over a new franchise: assessing the current health of public transport management in Melbourne Dr John Stone1 1 GAMUT Centre, PO Box PO Box 4191, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3052 Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Melbourne‟s unique franchise model for public transport management and service delivery, now a decade old, is a subject of international interest for practitioners and scholars of transport planning. In December 2009, two new franchisees, under reworked eight-year contract arrangements, took over the operation of Melbourne‟s train and tram systems ending the ten-year run of the two survivors of the first decade of public transport privatisation – Connex (Veolia) and the Transdev/Transfield consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project—Phase 1: Early Works Tunnel 1: Early Metro Project—Phase Melbourne
    Melbourne Project—Phase Metro Early Tunnel 1: Works Victorian Auditor -General’s Office — Level 31 / 35 Collins Street Melbourne Vic 3000 T 03 8601 7000 [email protected] www.audit.vic.gov.au — Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project— June 2019 Phase 1: Early Works June 2019 2018–19: 28 Independent assurance report to Parliament 2018–19: 28 24022 VAGO_Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project-Phase 1-Early Works_Cover_r2.pdf | Page 1 of 1 24022 VAGO_Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project-Phase 1-Early Works_Cover_r2.pdf | Page 1 of 1 Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project— Phase 1: Early Works Independent assurance report to Parliament Ordered to be published VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER June 2019 PP no 38, Session 2018–19 This report is printed on Monza Recycled paper. Monza Recycled is certified Carbon Neutral by The Carbon Reduction Institute in accordance with the global Greenhouse Gas Protocol and ISO 14040 framework. The Lifecycle Analysis for Monza Recycled is cradle to grave including Scopes 1, 2 and 3. It has FSC Mix Certification combined with 99% recycled content. ISBN 978 1 925678 50 5 The Hon Shaun Leane MLC The Hon Colin Brooks MP President Speaker Legislative Council Legislative Assembly Parliament House Parliament House Melbourne Melbourne Dear Presiding Officers Under the provisions of section 16AB of the Audit Act 1994, I transmit my report Melbourne Metro Tunnel Project—Phase 1: Early Works. Yours faithfully Andrew Greaves Auditor-General 6 June 2019 Contents Audit overview ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to Infrastructure Victoria's 30 Year Draft Strategy
    Submission to Infrastructure Victoria’s 30 Year Draft Strategy Rail Freight Alliance The Rail Freight Alliance is made up of rural, regional, and metropolitan Councils across Victoria. The Alliance membership strongly believes that more freight on rail will add to the efficiency, productivity, and prosperity of the nation. Our Membership includes the Councils of Ararat City, Buloke, Central Goldfields, Ballarat City, City of Melbourne, East Gippsland, Latrobe City, Loddon, Gannawarra, Glenelg, Greater City of Bendigo, Greater Shepparton, Hindmarsh, Horsham Rural City, Maribyrnong City, Melton City, Mildura Rural City, Moyne, Northern Grampians, Pyrenees, Southern Grampians, Strathbogie, Swan Hill Rural City, Warrnambool, West Wimmera, Wyndham City and Yarriambiack. Victoria 2021 Victoria is at a pivotal time in its history. By 2050 the freight task is predicted to triple, and Melbourne is forecast to be the biggest city in Australia. The freight task is not unique to Victoria or Australia, globally countries are investing in rail freight to meet this challenge, it is disappointing this is not the direction the Victorian Government is taking. The Port of Melbourne is expected to increase its freight task three-fold from today’s freight task. The task of moving this freight throughout Victoria, keeping people safe, providing a livable state and keeping within designated emissions and air quality will be a challenge over the next decades. Congestion within Melbourne is now a major issue and the cost of using Victoria’s toll road system continues to climb well above CPI. One in five vehicles on Melbourne’s toll roads is now a heavy vehicle and this trend is not predicted to decrease.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Major Road Projects
    Management of Major Road Projects Management of Major Road Projects June 2011 Victorian Auditor-General’s Report June 2011 2010-11:34 2010-11:34 Level 24 Telephone 61 3 8601 7000 35 Collins Street Facsimile 61 3 8601 7010 Melbourne Vic. 3000 www.audit.vic.gov.au V I C T O R I A Victorian Auditor-General Management of Major Road Projects Ordered to be printed VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT PRINTER June 2011 PP No 38, Session 2010–11 This report has been produced to ISO14001 environmental standards. It is printed on FSC credited Novatech Satin paper. The print supplier, Blue Star PRINT has initiated an EMS promoting minimisation of environmental impact through the d eployment of efficient technology, rigorous quality management procedures and a philosophy of reduce, re-use and recycle. ISBN 978 1 921650 78 9 The Hon. Bruce Atkinson MLC The Hon. Ken Smith MP President Speaker Legislative Council Legislative Assembly Parliament House Parliament House Melbourne Melbourne Dear Presiding Officers Under the provisions of section 16AB of the Audit Act 1994, I transmit my performance report on the Management of Major Road Projects. Yours faithfully D D R PEARSON Auditor-General 1 June 2011 Victorian Auditor-General’s Report Management of Major Road Projects iii Contents Audit summary............................................................................................vii Background.............................................................................................................vii Conclusions ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction: WGTP Project Goals
    1. Introduction: WGTP Project goals Victorian Transport Action Group (VTAG) acknowledges that the goals of the proposed West Gate Tunnel Project (WGTP) are to: 1. address the growing congestion needs of the West and remove congestion on the M1 2. provide alternatives to the West Gate Bridge 3. remove 9,300 trucks from local roads 4. improve travel times and provide resilience in the transport system 5. increase transport access and connectivity of the West with the Port of Melbourne, as well as with the north-west, central city and south of the city. WGTP is thus intended to contribute to the expected growth of the economy and jobs in the decades ahead. 2. Introduction: WGTP has Major Flaws 1. VTAG’s argument is that the project will achieve very few of these goals. 2. VTAG is concerned that instead of addressing congestion and improving access to the north and central city, the WGTP will shift congestion from the West to the inner city and destroy the character and liveability of those areas. 3. VTAG believes the objectives and decision-making principles of the Victorian Transport Integration Act 2010 (the Act) are not being met. 3. Introduction: WGTP is not supported by the Transport Integration Act We believe the Transport Integration Act 2010 (the Act) is not being fulfilled: 1. Victoria’s Transport Plan has NOT been prepared and periodically revised. 2. Major projects (inc the WGTP) are being proposed and assessed without reference to an agreed planning framework . 3. These projects cannot be accurately assessed against the objectives of the Act.
    [Show full text]