8Th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet 8Th Grade Social

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8Th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet 8Th Grade Social 8th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet Teacher: _______________ _____________ School: ______________________ Virtual Office Hours: 9:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m. & 1:00 p.m.- 3:00 p.m. Conference Call Dial-in Number: __________ Dial-in Access Code: Online Meeting URL: __________________________________ Online Meeting ID: ______________________________ April 13 April 14 April 15 April 16 April 17 Standard: 8.2.CO Standard: 8.2.CO Standard: 8.2.CO Standard: 8.2.CO Standard: 8.2.CO Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Explaining (Continued from April Reading and writing to Compare the motives Revolutionary Parliamentary 13th) compare the motives and demographics of Leaders Taxation. and demographics of Loyalists and Patriots Learning Task: Photo Explaining Loyalists and Patriots within South Carolina Analysis Document analysis, Parliamentary within South Carolina and the colonies using vocabulary matching, Taxation. and the colonies. a chart. and writing prompts. Document analysis, vocabulary matching, and writing prompts. Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Video: Quick Write: In 3-5 https://www.youtube.com/ sentences discuss the watch?v=Rx4uV2Ret2w response of the colonists to the Stamp Act. Did the Interview your parents or law contribute to the other adults to see if they like to pay taxes. eventual Revolutionary War? April 20 April 21 April 22 April 23 April 24 Standard: 8.2.CO Standard: 8.2.CC, 8.2.P Standard: 8.2.CC Standard: 8.2.CC Standard: 8.2.CC Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Period Learning Tasks: Long Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: of Salutary Neglect Term Effects of of Slavery T-Chart Document analysis, vocabulary matching, Learning Task: Short Learning Task: Text constructed response document analysis, answer question Analysis answers, writing constructed response prompt answers, writing prompt Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Write 3-5 Sentences Video: Quick Write (Video: Quick Write: Use explaining How did https://www.pbs.org/wn evidence from the text to 8th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet https://www.youtube.co et/african-americans- explain the effects of the contribution lead to the m/watch?v=sdAyZHAtVLk many-rivers-to- cotton gin on slaves. success of the patriots cross/video/the-cotton- during the Revolutionary economy-and-slavery/) War? April 27 April 28 April 29 April 30 May 1 Standard: 8.2.P Standard: 8.2.P Standard: 8.2.P Standard: 8.2.P Standard: 8.2.P Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Learning Tasks: Reading, document Entry Slip Entry Slip Entry Slip analysis, constructed Learning Task: Reading, response questions document analysis, Founding Principles: Founding Founding Principles/ constructed response Federalism Reading Principles/Checks and Republicanism: Analyze questions, quick write and constructed balances and the Preamble and response questions separation of powers: identify ways the Compare and contrast government performs Exit Slip the principle the duties in society. Exit Slip Exit Slip Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Extension Activities Create your own Watch the video: Watch the following videos: amendment: Quick Write https://www.youtube.com/ https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=HuFR5XBYLfU watch?v=j7jxVwcwnqw Use the information from https://www.youtube.com/ the video to assist you with watch?v=eqlaFRevf5Q the comparison activity. Summarize the origin of Republicanism and it looks in America today. Explain Republicanism as a government system. 8th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet April 13, 2020 Indicator: 8.2.CE Explain the economic, political, and social factors surrounding the American Revolution. Topic: Parliamentary Taxes -Reading and writing Entry Slip: Review the terms below, then draw a picture that you will use to help you remember the term. Stamp Act: A tax that put an expensive tax on all legal documents, newspapers, colanders, and almanacs. Townshend Act: A tax that taxed things colonist couldn’t make for themselves like paint, glass, lead, paper, and tea. Quartering Act: This Act forced colonist to allow British soldiers to live in their homes. Intolerable Acts: This act imposed a series of laws that cracked down on rebellious activity in the Massachusetts Colony. Directions: Explain using the definitions above: 1. Why do you believe these Act were put into place by the British? 2. How do you think this made the American colonist feel and what do you think will happen in the future? Context: To help better understand the people and locations involved, write a sentence using each term below. Key Term Sentence Stamp Act Townshend Act Quartering Act Intolerable Acts April 14, 2020 Document Analysis: Read the attached document. Underline or highlight the following: Stamp Act, Townshend Act, Quartering Act, and Intolerable Acts. Entry Slip: 1. How did the Stamp Act, Townshend Act, Quartering Act, and Intolerable Acts effect the lives of the Colonists? SCB AW RNL 8th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet Hey, King: Get off our Backs! A Raw Deal But then times got tough, and the British government went looking for money. Great Britain, which now included both England and Scotland, saw its colonies around the world as a source of profit. Colonies were places to cut timber, grow This is SO not crops such as cotton and coffee, and mine for valuable going to work. minerals. The king forced the colonists to sell these raw materials back to England at really cheap prices. People in England would use the materials to make finished products. But did the colonists get a bargain on these items because they provided the materials? No way! The king forced the colonists to buy the finished products at extra high prices. Hmm... What about t axing the American Looking for a Fast Buck? colonists? That was only the beginning. In the mid-1700’s, Britain fought two expensive wars. Britain had taken out a lot of debt to pay for the war, so it went looking for a way to make money fast. Taxing the American colonists seemed like the perfect idea. So, in 1765, Britain passed the Stamp Act, which forced colonists to put expensive tax stamps on all legal documents, as well as newspapers, calendars, and almanacs. The colonists had an answer for that: They quit buying British goods! But this boycott didn’t work for long. Britain repealed the Stamp Act after A stamp King George III one year, but things did not get better. From Bad to Worse As soon as the Stamp Act was gone, the British passed the Declaratory Act saying that the colonies were dependent on the king and declaring that all laws passed in the colonies had no effect. As if that weren’t bad enough, Britain also passed the Townshend Revenue Act, taxing things it knew the colonists couldn’t make for themselves: paint, glass, paper, lead, and tea. This Act also allowed British government workers to search peoples’ houses and even break down doors to seize items the homeowner hadn’t paid taxes for. On top of that, the Quartering Acts of 1765 and 1774 forced certain colonists to let British troops live in their houses. The soldiers didn’t even have to pay rent! Then, in the 1770s, a series of laws cracked down on rebellious activity in Massachusetts colony. Colonists called these the Intolerable Acts. SCB AW RNL 8th Grade Social Studies Distance Learning Packet April 15, 2020 Topic: How physical location influenced people of South Carolina to support Loyalists or Patriots -Reading and writing 1. Entry Slip: Review the terms below and write a description of what you will use to help remember the term. Loyalist (Also called Tories): A person who remained loyal to Britain in the American Revolution Patriot: The name was given to an American who fought the British in the American Revolution Backcountry (Also called Upcountry): The region containing the Piedmont and Blueridge Regions Lowcountry: The region from the coast to the Sandhills. Explain using the definitions above: A. Why do you believe Loyalists and Patriots did not get along? B. Why do you believe people in the Low Country and Backcountry often did not agree? 2. Context: Cover the answers above, match the term to the definition. Key Term Definition Loyalist The name given to an American who fought the British in the American Revolution Patriot The region containing the Piedmont and Blueridge Regions Backcountry A person who remained loyal to Britain in the American Revolution Lowcountry The region from the coast to the Sandhills. 3. Directions for Document Analysis: Read the Article below. (1.) Circle Backcountry each time it occurs. (2.) Put a box around Low Country each time it occurs. (3.) Underline the word that describes the topic or subject of each sentence. Answer the following questions after you read and mark up the document: A. Where did most people settle in South Carolina before the mid-1700s? B. What stopped settlers from moving to the Backcountry? Before the mid-1700s, South Carolina nearly entirely settled near the coast in the Low Country. The Backcountry of the colony was open to attack and largely controlled by Native Americans. No settlers dared to venture out into the unknown for fear of attack or from becoming lost in the wilderness. There were very few paths or trails leading to the Backcountry and most of the territory was unsettled (Johnson, pg. 10). Conditions of the rivers and streams were also very challenging, as most were wild rapids that were too treacherous to cross. The land that many settlers found was often barren and unable to settle. Other areas covered with swamplands were unsuitable for agriculture and infested by dangerous creatures (Johnson, pg. 11). The few that did dare to venture out into the Upcountry struggled mightily to survive.
Recommended publications
  • The Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon
    The Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon Standards Addressed: Social Studies 3-3: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the American Revolution and South Carolina’s role in the development of the new American nation. 3-3.1 Summarize the causes of the American Revolution, including Britain’s passage of the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and the Intolerable Acts; the rebellion of the colonists; and the writing of the Declaration of Independence. 3-3.3 Summarize the course of the American Revolution in South Carolina, including the role of William Jasper and Fort Moultrie; the occupation of Charles Town by the British; the partisan warfare of Thomas Sumter, Andrew Pickens, and Francis Marion; and the battles of Cowpens, Kings Mountain, and Eutaw Springs. Visual Arts Standard 1: The student will demonstrate competence in the use of ideas, materials, techniques, and processes in the creation of works of visual art. Indicators VA3-1.1 Use his or her own ideas in creating works of visual art. VA3-1.3 Use and combine a variety of materials, techniques, and processes to create works of visual art. Objectives: 1. Students will demonstrate their understanding of four historical, South Carolina figures and how their roles during the Revolution contributed to Charleston history. 2. Students will make a connection between the four historical accounts and the history/role of the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon. Materials: Teacher lesson: Write-up- “History of the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon” Pictures- Labeled A, B, C, D, and E Online virtual
    [Show full text]
  • Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict Along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City
    Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City by Craig Thomas Marin BA, Carleton College, 1993 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Craig Thomas Marin It was defended on December 4, 2007 and approved by Dr. Seymour Drescher, University Professor, Department of History Dr. Van Beck Hall, Associate Professor, Department of History Dr. John Markoff, Professor, Department of Sociology Dissertation Director: Dr. Marcus Rediker, Professor, Department of History ii Copyright © by Craig Thomas Marin 2007 iii Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City Craig Thomas Marin, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2007 This dissertation argues that the economic demands of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world made Charleston, South Carolina, a center of significant sailor, slave, and servant resistance, allowing the working people of the city’s waterfront to permanently alter both the plantation slave system and the export economy of South Carolina. It explores the meanings and effects of resistance within the context of the waterfront, the South Carolina plantation economy, and the wider Atlantic World. Focusing on the period that began with the major slave rebellion along the Stono River in 1739 and culminated with the 1785 incorporation of Charleston, this dissertation relies on newspapers, legislative journals, court records, and the private correspondence and business papers of merchants and planters to reveal the daily activities of waterfront workers as they interacted with each other, and with their employers and masters.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Congaree National Park
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Congaree National Park GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Congaree National Park cong_geology.pdf Version: 1/27/2014 I Congaree National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Congaree National Park Table of Contents Geolog.i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .M...a..p.. .D..o..c..u..m...e..n..t....................................................................... 1 About th..e.. .N...P..S.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .P...r.o..g..r.a..m........................................................... 2 GRI Dig.i.t.a..l. .M...a..p.. .a..n..d.. .S..o..u..r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C..i.t.a..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................. 4 Map Un.i.t. .L..i.s..t.......................................................................................................................... 5 Map Un.i.t. .D..e..s..c..r.i.p..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................................................. 7 Qme - M...o..v..e..d.. .e..a..r.t.h.. .(..H..o..l.o..c..e..n..e..).................................................................................................................................... 7 Qfw - F..r..e..s..h..w...a..t.e..r. .m...a..r.s..h.. .a..n..d.. .s..w....a..m..p.. .d..e..p..o..s..i.t.s.. .(.H...o..lo..c..e..n..e..)........................................................................................ 7 Qslk - S..a..n..d..h..i.l.ls.
    [Show full text]
  • Charleston Through the Eighteenth Century: Archaeology at the Heyward- Washington House Stable
    Charleston through the Eighteenth Century: Archaeology at the Heyward- Washington House Stable By Martha A. Zierden And Elizabeth J. Reitz With contributions from John Jones John E. Fosse Bruce L. Manzano Prepared for The Charleston Museum Archaeological Contributions 39 The Charleston Museum May 2007 ii Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction . 1 Introduction . 1 Previous Research . 3 Role of the Present Project . 4 Research Issues . 5 Chapter II: Historical Development . 11 The Settling of Charles Town . 11 Development of the Heyward-Washington Property . 13 The Revolutionary Era . 15 The Heyward Property before and after the Revolution . 17 Agricultural Prosperity . 22 The Civil War . 25 Church Street in the 19th Century . 27 Chapter III: Fieldwork . 29 Fieldwork . 29 Description of Excavated Proveniences . 30 Construction Monitoring . 40 Features from the 1970s Project . 45 Chapter IV: Material Culture . 49 Laboratory Methods . 49 Analysis . 50 1730-1740: John Milner, Gunsmith . 52 1740-1760s: the 1740 Fire and John Milner Jr. 59 1770-1820: the Heyward and Grimke periods . 68 Late 19th century Assemblage . 76 Materials from the 1970s excavations . 81 Chapter V: Interpretation of the Site . 93 Site Formation Processes . 94 Construction and Evolution of the Stable . 98 The late Colonial Landscape . 101 The early Landscape . 111 Chapter VI: Interpretation of the Artifacts . 115 Temporal Analysis . 115 Refinement and the Consumer Revolution . 127 Chapter VII: Interpretation of the Animals . 133 Animal Remains from the Heyward-Washington Stable . 133 iii Animal Use and the Urban Environment . 152 References . 169 Appendicies I. Data tables, Animal Remains from the Heyward Washington Stable . 201 Elizabeth J. Reitz and Carol Colaninno II.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine
    THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL M AGAZINE PUBLISHED Q UARTERLY BY THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CHARLESTON, S. C. EDITEDY B A.. S SALLEY, JR., SECRETARY A ND TREASURER OF THE SOCIETY. VOLUME I I. Printed f or the Society by THE WALKER. EVANS & COGSWELL CO., Charleston, S. C. I90I. OFFICERS OFHE T South C arolina Historical Society President, G en. Edwakd McChauy. 1st V ice-President, Hon. Joseph W. Barnwell. %nd V 'u-e- President, Col. Zimmerman Davis. 3rd V ice • President , Henry A. M. Smith, Esy. -i-th V ice-President, Hon. F. H. Weston. Secretary a nd Treasurer and Librarian, A. S. Salley, Jr. Curators : Langdon C heves, D.. E IIuger Smith, S. P rioleai: Ravenel, Theodore I). Jervey, Charles. W Kollock, M. D. Rev. C. S. Vedder, I). D., Rev. John Johnson, D. D. Rev. Robkrt Wilson, D D. Boardf o Managers. kAll o the korkgoino offioeks. Publication Committee. Joseph. W Barnwell, Henry. A M. Smith, A.. S Salley, Jr, THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL M AGAZINE PUBLISHED Q UARTERLY BY THE SOUTH C AROLINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CHARLESTON, S. C. VOL.I— I NO. 1. JANUARY. lQOl. Entered a t the Postoffice at Charleston, S. C, as Second-class Matter. Printed f or (he Society by THE WALkER. EVANS & COGSWELL CO., Charleston, S. C 1901. .Joseph W Barnwell, Henry A. M. Smith, A. S S alley, Jr. EDITORF O THE MAGAZINE. A. S. S.vi.i.kv. .Ik. CONTENTS fPapers o the First Council of Safety 3 The M ission of Col.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES in SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015
    AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES IN SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015 State Historic Preservation Office South Carolina Department of Archives and History should be encouraged. The National Register program his publication provides information on properties in South Carolina is administered by the State Historic in South Carolina that are listed in the National Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Register of Historic Places or have been Archives and History. recognized with South Carolina Historical Markers This publication includes summary information about T as of May 2015 and have important associations National Register properties in South Carolina that are with African American history. More information on these significantly associated with African American history. More and other properties is available at the South Carolina extensive information about many of these properties is Archives and History Center. Many other places in South available in the National Register files at the South Carolina Carolina are important to our African American history and Archives and History Center. Many of the National Register heritage and are eligible for listing in the National Register nominations are also available online, accessible through or recognition with the South Carolina Historical Marker the agency’s website. program. The State Historic Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History welcomes South Carolina Historical Marker Program (HM) questions regarding the listing or marking of other eligible South Carolina Historical Markers recognize and interpret sites. places important to an understanding of South Carolina’s past. The cast-aluminum markers can tell the stories of African Americans have made a vast contribution to buildings and structures that are still standing, or they can the history of South Carolina throughout its over-300-year- commemorate the sites of important historic events or history.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Rutledge • John Rutledge
    South Carolina’s Founding Fathers www.carolana.com © 2018 – J.D. Lewis Little River, SC Terms of Use: Any or all parts of this slideshow may be used by anyone for any purpose free of charge – with one stipulation. The user must cite “www.carolana.com” as the source and may not alter any material used. 2 Table of Contents Topic Slide No. Quick Lookback at Representative Gov’t 4 SC Quick Lookback (1629 to 1775) 10 The American Revolution (1775 to 1783) 32 SC Joins the United States (1783 to 1790) 92 Sources 140 Appendix A – Founding Fathers From 143 Each District / Parish 3 Quick Lookback at Representative Government 4 Ancient Democracies, Republics & Constitutions • Athenian democracy developed around the fifth century BC in the Greek city-state of Athens. Spread to other city-states. • It was a system of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted directly on legislation and executive bills. This was not considered to be a “representative government,” however. • To vote one had to be an adult, male citizen, i.e., not a foreign resident, a slave, or a woman. • Leaders elected at random by citizens. • Solonian Constitution drafted in 594 BC. Greek Senate c. 450 BC • Indian City State of Vaishali functioned as what would be called a Republic. There were other similar city-states, all in northern India. • Decision making by voting of two primary groups: Martial or warrior class Trade guilds/agriculturists class • Code of Manu issued in 3rd Century BC. North Indian Assembly c.400 BC • Two Consuls – executive leaders • Senate comprised of 300 upper class citizens • Tribune comprised of 10 lower class citizens • Citizen Assemblies (adult males only) • Two-party system – Patricians & Plebians • Leaders elected lower members • Considered to be a Republic • 12 Tables (constitution-like) codified in 450 BC.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina in the American Revolution
    South Carolina in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati South Carolina in the American Revolution An Exhibition from the Library and Museum Collections of The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Washington, D. C. October 21, 2004 – April 9, 2005 his catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the Texhibition South Carolina in the American Revolution on display from October 21, 2004, to April 9, 2005, at Anderson House, Headquarters, Library and Museum of the Society of the Cincinnati, 2118 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20008. The exhibition is the eighth in a series focusing on the eft mainly to her own resources, contributions to the American Revolution made by the original it was through bloodshed thirteen states and the French alliance. L and devastation and the depths Generous support for this exhibition was provided by the of wretchedness that [South Carolina’s] Society of the Cincinnati of the State of South Carolina. citizens were to bring her back to her place in the republic by their own heroic courage Also available: and self devotion, having suffered more, Massachusetts in the American Revolution: “Let It Begin Here” (1997) New York in the American Revolution (1998) and dared more, and achieved more New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) than the men of any other state. Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) — George Bancroft, (2002) Delaware in the American Revolution History of the United States (1857) Georgia in the American Revolution (2003) Text by Ellen McCallister Clark Front cover illustration: Captain Jacob Shubrick by Henry Benbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Lead Shot from Fort Motte, 2004-2012: Assessing Combat Behavior in Terms of Agency Stacey Renae Whitacre University of South Carolina - Columbia
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2013 An Analysis of Lead Shot from Fort Motte, 2004-2012: Assessing Combat Behavior in Terms of Agency Stacey Renae Whitacre University of South Carolina - Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Whitacre, S. R.(2013). An Analysis of Lead Shot from Fort Motte, 2004-2012: Assessing Combat Behavior in Terms of Agency. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/2479 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF LEAD SHOT FROM FORT MOTTE, 2004-2012: ASSESSING COMBAT BEHAVIOR IN TERMS OF AGENCY by Stacey R. Whitacre Bachelor of Arts Georgia State University, 2008 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2013 Accepted by: Charles Cobb, Director of Thesis Steven D. Smith, Co-Director of Thesis Carlina De La Cova, Reader Terrance Weik, Reader Lacy Ford, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Stacey R. Whitacre, 2013 All Rights Reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thanks to my advisors Dr. Steven D. Smith and Dr. Charles Cobb for their patience and encouragement as I wrote this thesis. Their comments and suggestions were both insightful and supportive and this thesis would not be what it is without them.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Commission Searches SC Swamps for Gen. Francis Marion
    Vol. 4 No. 1_____________________________________ ________________January – March 2007 Trail Commission Searches SC Swamps for Gen. Francis Marion The oil on canvas painting, General Marion Inviting a British Officer to Share His Meal, by Eutaw Springs artist John Blake White (1781 - 1859), memorializes the “Swamp Fox” sharing his sweet potato dinner with a British officer reported by “Parson” Mason Locke Weems in his highly romanticized The Life of General Francis Marion: A Celebrated Partisan Officer, in the Revolutionary War, Against the British and Tories in South Carolina and Georgia. This painting was presented to the United States Senate in 1899. According to the artist’s son, Octavius A. White: “the figure of Marion is a portrait from memory, as my father, when a boy, knew him well. Marion’s farm adjoined the plantation of my grandfather.” If this is true, this is the closest any artistic representation of Marion is to the artist having painted a contemporaneous image of the partisan. For more information on this painting, see the catalogue write-up at http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/art/artifact/Painting_33_00002.htm. For recent “news” on Oscar Marion, see http://fusilier.wordpress.com/2006/12/17/oscar-marion-is-anonymous-no-longer. The Francis Marion Trail Commission will seek out the documentation and archaeology to sort the myth from the man and to accurately depict the story of the Revolution in the Pee Dee and Lowcountry of South Carolina on those hallowed grounds. 1 Editor / Publisher’s Notes Academicians have many academic journals in which to publish articles, but the lay writers are much more limited.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Norfolk, Charleston and Alexandria, 1763-1800
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1992 Artisans of the South: A comparative study of Norfolk, Charleston and Alexandria, 1763-1800 Mary Catherine Ferrari College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ferrari, Mary Catherine, "Artisans of the South: A comparative study of Norfolk, Charleston and Alexandria, 1763-1800" (1992). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623819. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-qpqy-6h57 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Carolina Assembly, 1783-1800 Christopher Frank
    ESTABLISHING A REPUBLIC: THE SOUTH CAROLINA ASSEMBLY, 1783-1800 CHRISTOPHER FRANK LEE San Antonio, Texas B.A., Rice University, 1977 M.A., University of Virginia, 1982 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia May 1986 © Copyright by Christopher Frank Lee All Rights Reserved May, 1986 This study examines how South Carolina--the most aristocratic American state--created republican government in the wake of the American Revolution. In 1783, state authorities confronted enormous problems--debt, a ravaged economy, and the legacy of internecine guerilla war. In addition, long-standing conflicts between lowcountry and backcountry awaited resolution. Finally, a representative government had to supersede a monarchical one. Solving these problems was the task, and the accomplishment, of the General Assembly between 1783 and 1800. Acting mostly in response to citizen's petitions, the Assembly addressed everything from slave behavior and lawyers' qualifications to legal structure and debt. An expanded judicial system for the first time gave people throughout the state convenient access to the courts. A modified tax structure reduced disproportionate levies on the backcountry. The postwar Assemblymen improved transportation to allow the backcountry equal access to markets. They established a dozen colleges and seminaries to educate essential to a virtuous republican citizenry. The result was that, by 1800, white men throughout the state believed that they all stood on equal terms before iii iv the law, and that the laws favored no one section or interest. Over rather formidable odds, the Assembly had succeeded in establishing a republic.
    [Show full text]