REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN
REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, October 8, 2020 ZOOM / Conference Room - 9848 Aberdeen Road Coldstream, BC 6:00 p.m.
REGULAR AGENDA
A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
1. That in accordance with the Order of the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General Emergency Program Act, Ministerial Order No. M192 section 8(1), a board or a board committee established under section 218 [appointment of select and standing committees] of the Local Government Act may conduct all or part of a meeting of the board, board committee or body by means of electronic or other communication facilities; and further,
That in accordance with Ministerial Order No. M192 section 8(2) a member of a board or board committee who participates in a meeting by means of electronic or other communication facilities under this section is deemed to be present at the meeting.
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
1. Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - October 8, 2020
(Opportunity for Introduction of Late Items) (Opportunity for Introduction of Late Items - In Camera)
RECOMMENDATION 1 That the Agenda of the October 8, 2020 regular meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be approved as presented.
C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
1. Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - September 3, 2020
RECOMMENDATION 2 Page 5 - 9 That the Minutes of the September 3, 2020 regular meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be adopted as circulated.
Page 1 of 57
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Agenda October 8, 2020
D. DELEGATIONS
1. Okanagan Bioregion Food Systems Project Update Kristi Tatebe, Research Associate, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, Kwantlen Polytechnic University • Project Update – Summer 2020 • PowerPoint Presentation
Page 10 - 26
E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Kwantlen Polytechnic University - Institute for Sustainable Food Systems
At the September 3, 2020 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee meeting. Director Shatzko gave an overview regarding the opportunity to partner with Kwantlen Polytechnic University to create a sustainable agriculture education facility within the North Okanagan.
The Committee discussed possible partnerships with local sustainable farmers and questioned if small scale forestry could also be considered.
The Regional Planning Projects Manager asked the Committee for feedback on what programs, skills and training are required in the region and to forward on their feedback so it can be considered during the feasibility study.
2. Agricultural Land Commission Application LODGED INN LTD. c/o LING-ALLEN, P., [File No. 20-0773-C-ALR] 5657 Malim Road, Electoral Area "C" • Verbal update from the Regional Planning Projects Manager
F. NOTICE OF MOTION
Page 2 of 57
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Agenda October 8, 2020
G. NEW BUSINESS
1. Agricultural Land Commission Application MOYLE, W. & D., [File No. 20-1056-C-ALR] 5686 Malim Road, Electoral Area "C" • Agricultural Land Commission Application
Introduction of Agricultural Land Commission Application by Planning Staff
FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
1. Is the proposal good for agriculture? 2. What is the effect of the proposal on adjacent ALR properties and surrounding agricultural production? 3. Where appropriate, are there alternatives to the proposal? 4. Identify any issues relating to the protection of the ALR land specific to the application, including the use of appropriate buffering techniques aimed at enhancing land use compatibility.
Page 27 - 35
2. Upcoming Changes to Meat Regulations • Ministry of Agriculture Information Bulletin dated September 14, 2020 • Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: Rural Slaughter Modernization
FOR INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION
Page 36 - 50
3. Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch – Temporary Expanded Service Area Extension • Policy Directive No. 20-26
FOR INFORMATION
Page 51 - 53
4. REACH Agricultural Accelerator Pilot Program • REACH Agricultural Accelerator Pilot Program Information Document
FOR INFORMATION
Page 54 - 57
Page 3 of 57
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Agenda October 8, 2020
H. REPORTS
I. RESOLUTION TO GO IN CAMERA
J. ADJOURNMENT
Page 4 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN
REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING September 3, 2020 ZOOM / Conference Room - 9848 Aberdeen Road, Coldstream, BC 6:00 p.m.
REGULAR MINUTES
Members: D. Lapierre Agricultural Producer Chair T. Boeve Agricultural Producer (electronic) Vice Chair Director R. Fairbairn Electoral Area "D" Director H. Cameron Electoral Area “E" (electronic) Director D. Delisle Electoral Area "F" Director S. Fowler City of Armstrong (electronic) Director D. Nahal City of Vernon (electronic) Director B. Schreiner City of Enderby (electronic) Councillor G. Popoff Township of Spallumcheen I. Eggen Agricultural Producer P. Wendt Agricultural Producer M. Witt Agricultural Producer (electronic) J. Pilon Member at Large (electronic) *L. French Member at Large (electronic) T. Frisk Member at Large (electronic)
Staff: R. Smailes General Manager, Planning and Building L. Frank Regional Planning Projects Manager D. Kimberley Executive Assistant, Planning and Building
Also *Director A. Shatzko Electoral Area "C" (electronic) Present: Public
*Denotes presence for part of the meeting
CALL MEETING TO ORDER That in accordance with the Order of the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General Emergency Program Act, Ministerial Order No. M192 section 8(1), a board or a board committee established under section 218 [appointment of select and standing committees] of the Local Government Act may conduct all or part of a meeting of the board, board committee or body by means of electronic or other communication facilities; and further,
Page 1 of 5
Page 5 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - Regular September 3, 2020
That in accordance with Ministerial Order No. M192 section 8(2) a member of a board or board committee who participates in a meeting by means of electronic or other communication facilities under this section is deemed to be present at the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m.
The Chair introduced Lindsay Benbow, North Okanagan Regional Agrologist.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - September 3, 2020
Moved and seconded That the Agenda of the September 3, 2020 regular meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be approved with the following addition: • Item D.2 - Kwantlen Polytechnic University - Institute for Sustainable Food Systems CARRIED
ADOPTION OF MINUTES Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - July 8, 2020
Moved and seconded That the Minutes of the July 8, 2020 regular meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be adopted as circulated. CARRIED
DELEGATIONS Letter of Support Request - Okanagan Feed Mill Group Jon Couch and Paul Wendt
Jon Couch gave an overview of the Okanagan Feed Mill Group and requested a letter of support from the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee.
Moved and seconded That it be recommended to the Board of Directors, a letter of support be provided to the Okanagan Feed Mill Group for the development of a feed mill on ALR land within the North Okanagan. CARRIED
Kwantlen Polytechnic University - Institute for Sustainable Food Systems
Director Shatzko gave an overview regarding the opportunity to partner with Kwantlen Polytechnic University to create a sustainable agriculture education facility within the North Okanagan.
The Committee discussed possible partnerships with local sustainable farmers and questioned if small scale forestry could also be considered.
The Regional Planning Projects Manager asked the Committee for feedback on what programs, skills and training are required in the region and to forward on their feedback so it can be considered during the feasibility study. NEW BUSINESS
Page 2 of 5
Page 6 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - Regular September 3, 2020
Agricultural Land Commission Application MAZU, G. & T., [File No. 20-0721-D-ALR] 1562 Trinity Valley Road, Electoral Area "D"
The General Manager, Planning and Building introduced the Agricultural Land Commission Application.
The Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee provided the following comments: • Compassionate decision to let the parents stay at home. • Good for agriculture, family wants to continue farming. • Can build outside the ALR but due to topography and lay of the land this is not feasible.
Moved and seconded That the Agricultural Land Commission application of G. & T. Mazu for the property located at 1562 Trinity Valley Road, Electoral Area "D" for approval of a third residence for family be supported and that the application be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. CARRIED
Agricultural Land Commission Application LODGED INN LTD. c/o LING-ALLEN, P., [File No. 20-0773-C-ALR] 5657 Malim Road, Electoral Area "C"
The General Manager, Planning and Building introduced the Agricultural Land Commission Application.
The Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee provided the following comments: • Questions were raised if Pilates studio is considered home occupation use. • February to November seems like a long time for farm help in an orchard, is it necessary? • Agri-tourism building could be repurposed for farm help.
Moved and seconded That the Agricultural Land Commission application of Lodged Inn Ltd. c/o P. Ling-Allen for the property located at 5657 Malim Road, Electoral Area "C" for an additional residence for farm help be postponed until more information is provided by the applicant. CARRIED
Agricultural Land Commission Application LONE PINE RANCH, c/o LOOF-KOEHLER, E., [File No. 20-0822-B-ALR] 315 Commonage Road, Electoral Area "B"
The General Manager, Planning and Building introduced the Agricultural Land Commission Application.
The Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee provided the following comments: • Does not appear to be beneficial to agriculture. • Land doesn't have agricultural capabilities. • Application is lacking details regarding the proposed use of the property. • Grazing livestock is likely the only agriculture that could exist on the property due to the slope. • Property not being actively farmed, supportive of leaving it for grassland and grazing. Moved and seconded
Page 3 of 5
Page 7 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - Regular September 3, 2020
That the Agricultural Land Commission application of Lone Pine Ranch c/o E. Loof-Koehler for the property located at 315 Commonage Road, Electoral Area "B" to be excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve not be supported. DEFEATED Opposed: Director Nahal, Director Shreiner, Director Cameron, Director Fowler, Director Fairbairn, Councillor Popoff, Julie Pilon, Paul Wendt
Moved and seconded That the Agricultural Land Commission application of Lone Pine Ranch c/o E. Loof-Koehler for the property located at 315 Commonage Road, Electoral Area "B" to be excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve be supported and that the application be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. CARRIED Opposed: Director Delisle, Dennis Lapierre, Toby Frisk, Ian Eggen, Mike Witt, Tom Boeve
Lani French joined the meeting.
Agricultural Land Commission Application TOP VIEW DAIRY LTD. INC. NO. BC0396668 VAN DALFSEN, N. & S., c/o BROWNE JOHNSON LAND SURVEYORS, [File No. 20-0859-F-ALR] 3028/3218 Trinity Valley Road, Electoral Area "F"
The Regional Planning Projects Manager gave an overview of the Agricultural Land Commission application.
The Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee provided the following comments: • Questions about subdivision and allowed number of dwellings. • Questions about who currently farms the land.
Moved and seconded That the Agricultural Land Commission application of Top View Dairy c/o Browne Johnson Land Surveyors for the property located at 3028 & 3218 Trinity Valley Road, Electoral Area "F" for a boundary adjustment not be supported. CARRIED
Shuswap-North Okanagan (Sicamous to Armstrong) Rail Trail - Agricultural Land Reserve Update
The Regional Planning Projects Manager gave an update on the status of the Sicamous to Armstrong Rail Trail.
Ministry of Agriculture Announcement Changes to Class "D" and "E" Licensed Slaughter Facilities
The Regional Planning Projects Manager gave an update on the Ministry of Agriculture announcement regarding the changes to licensed slaughter facilities. The Ministry of Agriculture will administer Class D & E Licenses effective December 1, 2020, rather than local health authorities.
Page 4 of 5
Page 8 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee - Regular September 3, 2020
Upcoming Changes to Agricultural Land Reserve Commission Regulations
The General Manager, Planning and Building gave an update of the upcoming changes to the Agricultural Land Commission Act regulations.
Board Policy No. BPOL005 - Request for Exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve
The General Manager, Planning and Building outlined the upcoming changes and steps necessary for considering exclusion applications from the Agricultural Land Reserve and introduced the updated draft policy that was revised at the Electoral Area Advisory Committee.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
CERTIFIED CORRECT
Chair General Manager, Planning and Building
Dennis Lapierre Rob Smailes
Page 5 of 5
Page 9 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
The Okanagan Bioregion Food System Project Project Update - Summer 2020
Why Regional Food Systems? The food system is the network of activities, people, and resources that provide food and sustain communities. It includes activities across the food supply chain such as production, processing, distribution, retailing, consumption, and the management of waste. The food system plays a significant role in community health and wellbeing. Currently, the dominant food system is characterized by highly concentrated supply chains and export-oriented production. A singular focus on the global industrial food system can stifle local economic development, externalize environmental and social costs, and present vulnerabilities when faced with both global and local shocks. Strengthening regional food systems has the potential to address these challenges while contributing to local economic development.
What are bioregions and why are they important for food systems? Bioregions are areas that share similar ecology, climate, and human culture. Bioregions take into account the ecological and cultural characteristics of a place. Planning and collaboration at the bioregional scale have the potential to build a food system that prioritizes the needs of local communities, while respecting the ecological capacity of a place.
For the purposes of this project, the Okanagan Bioregion is defined as the three contiguous Regional Districts in the Okanagan (North Okanagan, Central Okanagan, and Okanagan-Similkameen), including the traditional territories of the Syilx and Splatsin nations.
Project Update - Summer 2020 Institute for Sustainable Food Systems I 1
Page 10 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
The Project This 3 year project uses a suite of economic, environmental, and food self-reliance indicators to assess the trade offs and outcomes associated with different food system choices, or “what-if” scenarios. Scenarios are illustrative, not predictive. The food system model combines three sub-models that collectively examine the trade-offs and opportunities associated with establishing a food system that prioritizes meeting local demand: 1) a food self-reliance model to estimate the proportion of bioregional food need that can be satisfied by agricultural production in the bioregion, 2) an environmental conservation model that examines the impacts of dedicating land to conservation uses such as hedgerows and riparian buffers, and 3) an economic input/output model that assesses the economic potential of different agricultural production scenarios. For each scenario, these combined models generate comparable data on food production, food self-reliance, GDP, total employment, tax revenue, agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, ecological footprint, agricultural water demand, and habitat connectivity, among other indicators.
Scenarios, predicated on achievable levels of food self-reliance, were selected to reflect local priorities. Scenarios are based on input from stakeholders in the bioregion. For example, scenarios highlight the economic, environmental and food self-reliance impacts of changes in productive agricultural land, strategically producing food to maximize food self-reliance, maintaining production of dominant export commodities, reserving land for habitat protection, or local diet choices.
In addition, complementary studies will present information about potential post-production sector development, nutrient supply and demand balances within the bioregion, and the social capital implications of food system choices. The results are still pending finalization and dissemination (targeted for late 2020). The information should prove valuable to policy and decision-makers in the region who seek to facilitate economic and community development by strengthening the bioregional food system.
Project Update - Summer 2020 Institute for Sustainable Food Systems I 2
Page 11 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Policy Research This project also includes a thorough Scenario Example: review of food system policy in the What if, by 2050, we prioritize food production to satisfy Okanagan bioregion. The review local food need, while protecting critical habitat for im- determined to what extent food portant species, such as salmon? What are the associated system objectives, prioritized by economic, environmental and food self-reliance impacts Okanagan stakeholders during previous and trade-offs? engagement sessions, were represented in local government policy. The policy For this scenario, we model how much of the food review identified the following gaps and consumed by the local population in 2050 can be resultant priority areas for strengthening met with the bioregion’s agricultural land base if the sustainable, regional food systems to bioregion were to strategically grow crops and raise meet stakeholder priorities: livestock to prioritize feeding the local population. Agricultural land overlapping with critical habitat and ● Increasing agricultural use of floodplain areas are removed from production to protect farmland and land access for salmon populations in the bioregion. Food self-reliance farmers is presented as the percentage of the total local diet that can be satisfied by local production. We then estimate the ● Prioritizing ecological integrity in economic and environmental implications associated with water policy this ‘what if’ scenario by reporting on indicators such as GDP, employment, GHG emissions from agriculture, ● Strengthening the bioregional post- habitat connectivity, ecological footprint, and other production sector metrics.
● Mitigating climate change through food system activities
● Adopting a systems approach to addressing food waste
Context and rationale for each priority area is outlined below. A suite of policy tools and existing precedents for each area will be shared for further exploration as part of the final project deliverables.
Increasing agricultural use of farmland and land access for farmers Currently, 50% of protected farmland in BC is used for agriculture.1 A primary reason for this underutilization of farmland is the inability of farmers to access land.2 Farmland protection is a strong policy focus in the Okanagan, however there are few policies aimed at facilitating access to farmland for bona-fide farmers. The ability of farmers to access land and establish farm businesses is fundamental to maintaining agricultural capacity and a functioning regional food system. As such, the analysis provides examples of policy tools and programs aimed at increasing access to agricultural land for farmers.
Prioritizing ecological integrity in water policy The food system is a primary water user in the Okanagan Bioregion, and agriculture represents 55% of all water used by humans in the region.3 Competing demand for limited water resources exerts pressure on freshwater ecosystems. Climate change, population growth and urban development introduce additional uncertainties for future water demand and availability.4 As such, there is a need to prioritize the ecological integrity of freshwater ecosystems in water policy in order to effectively steward these systems for the protection of both ecologies and livelihoods into the future. The policy analysis provides examples of policy actions and frameworks at multiple jurisdictions, applied broadly as well as to agriculture, aimed at improving freshwater stewardship.
Project Update - Summer 2020 Institute for Sustainable Food Systems I 3
Page 12 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Strengthening the bioregional post-production sector Post-production refers to the conversion of raw agricultural products into different forms of consumable goods. This includes activities such as processing, grading, packaging, and distribution. Consolidation across global supply chains has led to decreased post-production capacity in some regions, including the Okanagan bioregion, and limited access to these critical services for smaller producers. While the value and potential of post-production activities is recognized within the existing Okanagan policy landscape, operational support for strengthening this component of the food system is relatively limited. As such, the policy analysis brings forward examples of initiatives to strengthen the bioregional post-production sector, including land use planning, economic development strategies, and networking events for post production sector actors.
Mitigation of climate change through food system activities The food system accounts for up to 35% of global GHG emissions, and is a significant driver of global climate change.5 At the same time food system sectors, particularly agriculture, are increasingly vulnerable to climate change impacts. Within the Okanagan bioregion, as in many other regions, there is an increasing focus on climate change adaptation planning at the local government level. The policy analysis highlights strategies for local governments to help mitigate climate change impacts, while building stronger, more resilient local food systems.
Adopting a systems approach to addressing food waste Food loss and waste is a pressing policy issue for local governments, with complex social, environmental and economic implications. In Canada, it is estimated 40% of food is lost or wasted, at a cost of $31 billion dollars annually.6 In the Okanagan, policy addressing food waste is narrowly focused on the reduction and diversion of household food waste because of the impacts it can have on municipal waste management systems, and local GHG reduction targets. Local governments are often primarily responsible for solid waste management, including the development and operation of waste management facilities and services. The policy analysis presents examples of systems approaches to addressing food waste at the local level, including considerations of tradeoffs between food waste reduction, health, equity, and sustainability in the food system.
In summary, the Okanagan Bioregion Food System Project aims to provide data-driven information about the potential outcomes of a shift toward a bioregional food system for the Okanagan. The project uses ‘what-if’ scenarios to explore the trade-offs between different food system decisions and trajectories. The accompanying policy review identifies key gaps in the existing policy landscape, and brings forward policy tools for further consideration to address these gaps. The final project results will be available at the end of 2020 and will provide valuable information to local government decision makers who seek to support a more sustainable, resilient food system that benefits our communities. For additional information please contact ISFS Research Associate, Kristi Tatebe: [email protected]
Project Update - Summer 2020 Institute for Sustainable Food Systems I 4
Page 13 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Endnotes
1 BC Ministry of Agriculture (2016). Agriculture in Brief, Census of Agriculture, British Columbia Provincial Profile. Retrieved from https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/agriculture-seafood/ statistics/census-of-agriculture
2 Tatebe, K., Robert, N., Mulinix, K. (2018a) Protection Is Not Enough: Policy Precedents to Increase the Agriculture Use of British Columbia Farmland - White Paper. Accessed online: https://www.kpu.ca/ isfs/agricultural-land-use-in-the-alr
3 Summit Environmental Consultants Inc. (2010). Okanagan Water Supply and Demand Project: Phase 2 Summary Report. Retrieved from https://www.obwb.ca/wsd/about/project-reports
4 Okanagan Basin Water Board (2008) Okanagan sustainable water strategy: action plan 1.0. Okanagan Water Stewardship Council, Kelowna, BC.
5 Niles, M. T., Ahuja, R., Barker, T., Esquivel, J., Gutterman, S., Heller, M. C., Mango, N., Portner, Di., Raimond, R., Tirado, C., & Vermeulen, S. (2018). Climate change mitigation beyond agriculture: A review of food system opportunities and implications. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170518000029
6 Gooch, M., Bucknell, D., Laplain, D., Dent, B., Whitehead, P., Felfel, A., Glasbey, C. (2019). The Avoidable Crisis of Food Waste: Technical Report. Value Chain management International, Second Harvest, Ontario Canada. Accessed online: https://secondharvest.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ Avoidable-Crisis-of-Food-Waste-Technical-Report-January-17-2019.pdf
Project generously funded by:
Project Update - Summer 2020 Institute for Sustainable Food Systems I 5
Page 14 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Okanagan Bioregion Food System Design Project RDNO Agriculture Advisory Committee Presentation October 8, 2020
Acknowledgement
Page 15 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Institute for Sustainable Food Systems
Applied research and extension unit investigates and supports regional food systems as key elements of sustainable communities.
Multidisciplinary team • Agroecology • Planning & Policy • Natural resource management • Education • Resource economics • Farm business management • Community and household nutrition/ health
RDNO / ISFS Timeline
• RDNO AAC Delegation Sept. 21, 2017; Board Oct. 18, 2017
• Okanagan Bioregion Food System Design Project
Spring 2018 – Winter 2020/2021
RDNO AAC/Board Delegations / Project Stakeholder Projected Funding Requests Begins Workshops End
Sept/Oct May Jan. Oct. Dec 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020
2017 2018 2019 2020
Page 16 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Funders
Other partners
• First Nations & local governments • Producer organizatioorganizations
Page 17 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Project Background
Second of its kind
Project Background: Okanagan Bioregion
Areas that share similar topography, plant and animal life, and human culture.
Page 18 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Project Goals
Potential for regional food systems to
• increase food self-reliance
• contribute to local economic growth and jobs
• reduce negative environmental impacts
Describe
• Post-production business need/ opportunity *NEW* • Social capital development potential *NEW* • Policy gaps and avenues for support *NEW* • Utility of data for decision-making *NEW*
Method: Scenario Modelling
Scenarios are data-driven stories to explore trade-offs between Baselinefood self-reliance, modeling economic well-being and ecological integrity ● Baseline scenario: describes current food system outcomes ● Future scenarios: describes potential food system outcomes based on stakeholder feedback
● Indicator measurement: illustrates trade-offs between food self-reliance, economy, and environment
Page 19 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Supporting Studies:
● Critical habitat
Baseline● Social modeling capital
● Post-production
● Nutrient management
● Policy context
Progress update: Completed
• Background research
• Institutional procurement study
• Stakeholder workshops
• Scenario selection and Modelling
• Social capital assessment
Page 20 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Progress update: Completed
• Agricultural water requirements assessment
• Farm to Restaurant study
• Post-production study
• Policy analysis
Progress update: Pending
• Final nutrient analysis
• Critical habitat assessment
• Final water supply-demand case studies
• Economic impact assessment
• Final report and briefs – available early 2021
Page 21 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Preliminary Results
Food Self-Reliance: Baseline and future
33% 39% 69% 73%
Theoretical 2050 2016 0% 50% maximum 100% Business Baseline As Usual 2050 Optimized
Page 22 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Water Domain
• Incorporate agricultural water requirements into model output (complete)
• Supply-demand case studies to assess water availability (pending) • assessment of streamflow, demand, ecological flows • uses latest (2020) data from Okanagan Basin Water Board
Post-Production Sector: Preliminary Results
The post-production sector includes the people, infrastructure and networks involved in the aggregation, processing, and distribution of food and agricultural products.
• Locally oriented post-production infrastructure required to realize food self-reliance and economic outcomes of a regionalized food system • Outline key challenges and required support local post- production sector
Page 23 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Social Capital: Preliminary Results
Survey of 105 participants • Demonstrated positive relationship between local food system participation and social capital • Participants felt stronger local food systems = increased social capital
23 Interviews • Strong support for local/regional food system development • Local/regional food systems facilitate social connection and building networks – especially among producers
Policy & Planning
Scan of local government food system policy (summer 2019)
Identify 5 key areas for policy precedent research
1. Support use of farmland for food production
2. Develop post-production sector to support primary food production
3. Adopt whole supply chain consideration of food waste
4. Increase climate change mitigation capacity in the food system
5. Prioritize ecological integrity in water policy
Page 24 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Applications of the Research
• Data provides better understanding of decision outcomes Baseline• Underscores modeling importance of protecting agriculture lands • Feeds into upcoming processes (eg. Regional food system plans, OCP’s, farmer training initiatives etc.) • Contributes to local indicator measurement (eg. Vital Signs) • Advocating for funding/support from other levels of government
Next Steps
• Continuing to seek funding as the project completes Baseline• Dissemination modeling of results early in 2021
Page 25 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Questions?
http://www.kpu.ca/isfs/okanagan-bioregion
Page 26 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Provincial Agricultural Land Commission Applicant Submission
Application ID: 61330 Application Status: Under LG Review Applicant: Wayne Moyle , Diane Moyle Agent: Rhys Moyle Local Government: North Okanagan Regional District Local Government Date of Receipt: 09/29/2020 ALC Date of Receipt: This application has not been submitted to ALC yet. Proposal Type: Non-Adhering Residential Use - Additional Residence for Farm Use Proposal: Our purpose is to get approval for an additional dwelling to be built on my families property. My partner and I will live in the dwelling permanently as we plan to expand the current gardens and begin a viable agriculture business.
Our proposal for an additional dwelling allows us the affordability of utilizing the agricultural land to its full potential as we work towards our future agri-business. Although my partner and T are cunently living in the primary residence with my parents and brother (we moved back to B.C. this spring), this is a temporary option as there isn't enough space, long-term for everyone. The additional residence would let us live and work in close proximity to support my aging parents and my brother who is on disability, all of whom live in the primary residence and can no longer maintain the property let alone pursue any farming.
Agent Information
Agent: Rhys Moyle Mailing Address:
Parcel Information
Parcel(s) Under Application
1. Ownership Type: Fee Simple Parcel Identifier: 017-655-226 Legal Description: LA SEC 7 TP 5 OSOYOOS DIVISION YALE DISTRICT PL KAP46597 Parcel Area: 2.2 ha Civic Address: 5686 Malim Road Vernon BC VIB3J8 Date of Purchase: 01/05/1990
Page 27 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Land Use Type: Agricultural/Farm Specify Activity: House and haskups
West
Land Use Type: Residential Specify Activity: House on acerage
Proposal
1. What is the purpose of the proposal? Our purpose is to get approval for an additional dwelling to be built on my families property. My partner and I will live in the dwelling permanently as we plan to expand the current gardens and begin a viable agriculture business.
Our proposalfor an additional dwelling allows us the affordability ofutilizing the agricultural land to its full potential as we work towards our future agri-business. Although my partner and I are currently living in the primary residence with my parents and brother (we moved back to B. C. this spring), th;s is a temporary option as there isn't enough space, long-term for everyone. The additional residence would let us live and work in close proximity to support my aging parents and my brother who is on disability, all of whom live in the primary residence and can no longer maintain the property let alone pursue any farming.
2. Describe the necessity for an additional residence for farm use and how it will support agriculture in the short or long term. Currently this property isn't being utilized as an agriculturalfarm, and all production ofproduce has been for personal consumption only. My parents are now over 70 years old and with my brother unable to assist enough to keep the property maintained, even with the small scale ofthese gardens there is no hope for it to be properly utilized as a farm without our help. Our proposal to build a dwelhng allows my partner and I to start a.farm on the property and live alongside my family. We feel this is imperative to the property being appropriately used in the ALR.
For the past few years, we have been moving towards our goal o,f living and workingfull-time on this property. As o,f September we are now in. a financial and personal position to take this on.
My partner and I are committed to turning this into an active farm, while also living back on the property I grew up on and starting a family ofour own. With the proper care and attention the current gardens and existingfruit trees have the potential to be a starting point for our farm production. Our intent is to expand and grow these gardens, and to utilize the useable land available on the property. While my family has done a lot ofimprovements over the years including: soil amendment; irrigation; rock and shrub removal, etc., without our ability to live and help on this property we will not be able to expand this into a viable agricultural business.
Although the produce has never been sold commercially, this property has proven to be productive for fruit, vegetables, and garlic. My partner and I have already begun to plan and implement expansions to the current useable land areas. Our initial investment(s) are to build a new shed, continue to prepare new gardens, expand the current irrigation, and plant large crops ofgarlic and raspberr;es. Long term goals include developing products which utilize the produce that we will grow.
Our intent in doing this turns the property into a producingfarm, supports my partner and lfinandal!y, keeps the property in the family for the next generation(s), and provides a secure and desired living situat;onfor my parents and brother, who would all continue to remain on the property they have lived on for the past 30 years.
Page 28 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP AG RIC ULTURAL LAND COMMISSION
File: 20-1056-C-ALR Owner/Applicant: Wayne & Diane Moyle c/o Rhys Moyle Location: 5686 Malim Road
,,------··, :; , 3 it Rc.M 1fJ
5800 109 KAP29178 KAP352 ..3 .... 107 KAPti1005 5835
~ I 8 96 97 KAf-'1864 102 KAP352 i -i1 KAl"'J!i2 KA a B Sr:,JI KAP69408 :: ..~J , ------·- --- fAP 52 -5050 l - KA, '>2308 )5 li'i 5659 04 56300:: 2 5717 KAP2782 (AP~4274 . 5681 ~,, S 1651 KAP74E•' 5633 5 5632 559 5597 58 At351 5586
44;,,- >N?. 7 __56 495f f • _!jEJL 5620 5
2 P31" t9 KAI~ 2 KAF-~
KAP
"
Page 29 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
- I it'(O ~~~~ ------..... ---- _...... - 7 ;-----~--,-~------.... -. ·t f ":'r •
~' ...I I I I I' I I • I •I I I 15659 I r • J I ) I; a 2 I I I I I I I f · PLAN 27825 I I l I I I [ . r I l I l . • • f I I I' I 1 ' I I I I . J• ' CR • t ·1 I CI • -11 I l j I I ' I ' 5597 J I I I I 'I I J I • I. • 60 5453· i J ii>.>",C, OI
Page 30 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Regional District of North Okanagan Mapping Site ,.;j1,,~-- :-t-• IF~ N, Ii f ...,., l ,~;
Legend Page 31 of 57
1: 2,500 0 Notes 2016 photo 127.0 0 63.50 127.0 Meters This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliab:e. NAD_ 1983_LJTM_Zone_ 11N © Regional District of North Okanagan Date and Time Printed: 3/29/2018 9:27 AM THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Page 32 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Page 33 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Page 34 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Regional District of North Okanagan
Property Information Report
Folio: 722.00088.002 Sep 30, 2020 4:09:46 PM Site Address: 5686 MALIM RD Page: 1 of 1
Legal: LOT A, PLAN KAP46597, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 5, OSOYOOS DIV OF YALE LAND DISTRICT
PID: 017-655-226
BCAA Parcel Size: 5.51 ACRES
Additional Parcel Information: Value Description ALR SIZE (HA.) 2.23
LOT SIZE (HA.) 2.23
O.C.P. DESIGNATION 1 (HA.) AG 2.23
ZONING DESIGNATION 1 (HA.) CR 2.23
** IT IS RECOMMENDED that a Title Search be done to verify the existence of Easements and Statutory Right-of-Ways.
PUBLIC ADVICE: The Regional District of North Okanagan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the above information which has been compiled from several sources. These original sources should be checked to verifiy this information. Under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act this report is available for public distribution.
\\rdnofile\tempestapp$\TempestLive\INHOUSE\PROPRPT.QRP
Page 35 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
9/22/2020 Supporting rural ranchers, abattoirs to boost food security | BC Gov News
Supporting rural ranchers, abattoirs to boost food security https://news.gov.bc.ca/23064 Monday, September 14, 2020 11:45 AM
Victoria - Ranchers and abattoir operators in British Columbia are contributing to improve rural food supply and food security in the province, as part of ongoing government efforts to increase livestock production and processing in rural communities.
The Ministry of Agriculture has released an intentions paper with suggested policy changes to meat processing in rural areas of the province that prioritize food safety and animal welfare. The policy changes will also increase economic opportunities and strengthen B.C.’s provincial food system.
Policy changes being shared with ranchers, abattoirs, local governments and health authorities for consideration include:
increasing the amount of meat that can be processed annually by Class D and E licence holders, and expanding the criteria of who and where their meat can be sold to; developing alternative models of licensing mobile abattoirs to improve service for smaller-scale producers; exploring a pilot program for conducting certain inspection components virtually; and renaming the current “Class A, B, D and E licenses” to more intuitive categories.
The ministry is also collecting input on a number of topics to support public health and a safe meat supply, such as:
updating licensee training on slaughter practice, animal welfare and food safety to ensure provincially consistent and effective learning opportunities for rural producers; revising the code of practice for abattoir operators with required standard operating procedures to bring consistent practices and improved clarity for administrators and operators; and increasing the frequency of government inspector visits to rural abattoirs to an annual basis to ensure awareness and compliance with all requirements.
More details about the possible changes are included in a Ministry of Agriculture intentions paper at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/agriculture-seafood/food-safety/meat-inspection-licensing
Comments are being accepted from stakeholders and the public until Oct. 19, 2020.
Learn More:
Information on meat inspection in B.C., including licence types: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/agriculture-seafood/food-safety/meat-inspection-licensing
For the new consolidated process for provincial meat inspection licences under the Ministry of Agriculture, visit: https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2020AGRI0045-001549
The Select Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fish and Food’s public consultation on local meat production: https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2019AGRI0045-001135
A backgrounder follows. Media Contacts https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2020AGRI0051-001713 1/2
Page 36 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
9/22/2020 Supporting rural ranchers, abattoirs to boost food security | BC Gov News
Dave Townsend Government Communications and Public Engagement Ministry of Agriculture 250 356-7098 250 889-5945 (cell)
Backgrounders
Recent B.C. government changes to support rural meat production, processing
Allowing Class E establishments within one-hour travel time of a licensed Class A or B facility, instead of the two-hour limit that was in place before May 2019. Designating three new areas for Class D rural slaughter licensing: Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District, Electoral Area D in Regional District of Central Kootenay and Electoral Area H in Regional District of Fraser-Fort George. All slaughter activity licensed under the Meat Inspection Regulation for Class, A, B, D and E meat- slaughter licences will be regulated under the Ministry of Agriculture effective Dec. 1, 2020. Previously, regional health authorities had responsibility for Class D and E licences. Acting on recommendations made by the Select Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fish and Food in September 2018 in its report, Local Meat Production and Inspection in British Columbia. Delivering a series of food safety and animal welfare training workshops for rural producers. Highlighting local meat products through the Buy BC program. Funding food safety and traceability programs for meat producers.
https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2020AGRI0051-001713 2/2
Page 37 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper:
RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION
September 4, 2020
Page 38 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Contents
Introduction ...... 2 Background ...... 3 Statistics ...... 3 Recent Consultations ...... 5 Opportunities ...... 6 1. Public Health & Safety ...... 6 2. Innovation ...... 8
3. Regulatory Efficiency ...... 9 4. Provincial Food Supply Security ...... 9 Providing Comment on Rural Slaughter modernization ...... 11 Appendix A: B.C. Graduated Slaughter Licensing System ...... 11 Appendix B: Designated Regional Districts in Schedule 2 under the Meat Inspection Regulation ...... 13
Introduction
British Columbia’s provincial meat inspection program aims to provide a credible regulatory system that is effective in ensuring food safety and animal welfare, while also providing sufficient flexibility to enable a competitive slaughter industry, and slaughter capacity for livestock producers across B.C. Changes to the program will advance the Ministry’s over-arching goals to strengthen our provincial food system and will be complimentary to the Buy BC, Grow BC and Feed BC initiatives.
Food safety at rural slaughter establishments is a high priority for the Province of British Columbia. Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Health consider food safety as critical for controlling foodborne illnesses in B.C., public confidence in the B.C. food system, and a sustainable food industry in B.C.
The Ministry of Agriculture, with the support of the Ministry of Health, wants to improve rural meat inspection to realize efficiencies, minimize risks, ensure opportunity, and simplify practices for producers and processers while maintaining consumer confidence in meat products produced in B.C.
Simply put, we want to ensure that British Columbia has a client responsive and resource efficient regulatory approach that works for everyone to ensure economic opportunities and enhance safety of meat products around the province.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 2
Page 39 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Background
In British Columbia, regulatory frameworks have developed in the meat production and processing industries with attention to a variety of factors specific to the province like sparse populations spread over large distances, unique geography and weather patterns, and economic drivers such as the availability of agricultural land (see Appendix A: B.C. Graduated Slaughter Licensing System).
This intentions paper is part of the ongoing work to assess opportunities for improvement and positive change that will strengthen our provincial food system and ensure a strong and growing local meat industry in B.C. for many years to come.
Statistics
Livestock Farms in B.C. In 2016 there were 15,867 farms producing livestock and poultry in B.C.
Animal Type # of Farms in B.C. # of Animals in B.C. Poultry 6,710 22,048,072 Cattle 5,126 659,441 Sheep & Lamb 1,693 59,249 Hog 904 88,862 Other (Goats, Bison, Deer, Rabbits) 1,434 26,873 Total 15,867 22,882,497 source: Statistics Canada Census of Agriculture
Demand for Meat Products 2018 provincial meat consumption
Meat Type Provincial Consumption (kg)
Chicken, boneless weight 102,224,383
Beef 90,321,130
Pork 82,369,270
Turkey, boneless weight 16,903,955
Mutton and Lamb 4,751,112
source: Statistics Canada
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 3
Page 40 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Other Jurisdictions
British Columbia, along with Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador are the only provinces in Canada where consumer sales of uninspected meat products are permitted. British Columbia’s system of licensed and inspected Class A and B abattoirs along with uninspected Class D and E rural establishments is unique and has evolved to meet our unique circumstances.
Number of Licenced Slaughter Facilities in B.C. (map)
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 4
Page 41 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Recent Consultation
From 2016-2019 consultation initiatives focused on rural meat production and inspection, and gathered comprehensive input from: the general public including farmers, producers and processors; current and former Class D and E licensees; industry associations across the livestock sector; regional health authorities; and local governments.
Many of the concerns and opinions expressed about local slaughter to both the Ministry of Agriculture and the Select Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fish and Food (the “Committee”) were also articulated during town hall engagement sessions focused on the Agricultural Land Reserve in fall 2019.
On September 28, 2018, the Committee released a report “Local Meat Production and Inspection in British Columbia.” The report made 21 recommendations, all of which were accepted by the Province.
Progress on implementing the recommendations continues, including a significant change to allow Class E establishments within one-hour travel time of a licensed Class A or B facility, instead of the more restrictive two-hour limit that was in place before May 2019.
Ministry of Agriculture has also: delivered a series of food safety and animal welfare training workshops for rural producers; launched a comprehensive provincial slaughter capacity study that will serve as a baseline for future reviews of the B.C. Meat Inspection Program; highlighted local meat products as part of government’s Buy B.C. campaign; and provided funding through the federal-provincial Canadian Agricultural Partnership (CAP) program for food safety and traceability program development.
On June 11, 2020, the Province designated three new areas for Class D rural slaughter licensing: Alberni- Clayoquot Regional District, Electoral Area D in Regional District of Central Kootenay, and Electoral Area H in Regional District of Fraser-Fort George.
One of the dominant themes of recent consultation is that administration of all provincial slaughter should be consolidated under the Ministry of Agriculture. On August 19, 2020, the Ministry announced that responsibility for administration of rural slaughter (Class D and E licences), which is overseen by regional health authorities currently, will be returning to the Ministry of Agriculture effective December 1, 2020.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 5
Page 42 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Opportunities
1. Public Health & Safety
Food safety at rural slaughter establishments is a priority for the Provincial Government. We heard repeatedly from farmers, producers and those involved in production and the sale of B.C. meat who all want the food safety system to deliver high levels of food safety for consumers.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 6
Page 43 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Updated Risk Assessment Ministry of Agriculture will undertake a risk assessment project to support development options for rural meat production. The work will update an assessment from 2009 and will inform all aspects of food safety policy to lower risk and improve efforts to prevent food-borne illnesses such as those related to salmonella in poultry.
Updated Training Other opportunities include developing updated training materials to improve guidance on slaughter practice, animal welfare and food safety. This improved training would provide provincially consistent and effective learning opportunities for rural producers.
Updated Rural Code of Practice In addition to training, an updated rural code of practice with a requirement for standard operating procedures in rural facilities would build on current practices to establish higher standards and provide improved clarity about requirements for administrators and operators.
Oversight More comprehensive, more frequent and more consistent oversight of food safety plans, standard operating procedures, record-keeping by rural operators and operational practices by Ministry of Agriculture inspectors with experience and training in slaughter practice, animal welfare and food safety will also contribute to improved public health outcomes.
Increased Frequency of Rural Inspections Ministry of Agriculture’s resumption of responsibility for rural slaughter administration comes with a commitment to increasing the frequency of government inspector visits to rural abattoirs. Public reporting on inspections and compliance results will support consumer confidence that controls are in place for ensuring adherence to regulations.
Increased inspection frequency by Ministry of Agriculture inspectors will improve food safety and animal welfare outcomes, while offering protection for small-scale producers and the industry from unsafe practices and criticism, and potential negative impacts to communities of a food-borne illness event.
Education Before Enforcement The Ministry acknowledges that rural operators play a vital role in feeding their regions, and have a vested interest in providing only the safest meat to their customers. Every effort will be made to work with operators to inform them about implementing an updated rural code of practice with an emphasis on ensuring compliance.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 7
Page 44 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
2. Innovation
The Ministry of Agriculture is reviewing the entire slaughter licensing framework for opportunities to innovate and improve standards and simplify administration in a way that maintains all the high standards of food safety and animal welfare expected by B.C. consumers.
Alternatives to Traditional Inspection To support rural slaughter and improve oversight, Ministry of Agriculture is exploring opportunities to expand the use of agri- technologies, such as virtual inspections, as alternatives to the traditional model of having an inspector present during slaughter.
The Ministry is investigating technical, policy and legal aspects of ideas like remote ante-mortem inspection, delayed “cold” post- mortem inspection, and how third parties can be engaged to efficiently provide cost-effective inspection in remote communities. We are also developing a new approach to encourage mobile slaughter businesses.
Regulatory Changes Consideration will be given to aspects of rural slaughter regulation such as: volume of production; available markets for local meat products (farmgate vs. commercial retail and restaurants), and the geographic scope of where producers can sell their product. It is important to balance risk with other administrative changes to increase frequency of inspection oversight, ensure compliance with new improved operating standards, and improve training and education for operators.
Innovation is important not only for consideration of high-level frameworks but also for fundamental details such as re-defining regulatory terminology in a way that makes sense to all users of the system. For example, rather than Class A, B, D and E labels more intuitive licence type labels could help the public understand the service a licence holder can provide. Different types of licences might also be considered.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 8
Page 45 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
3. Regulatory Efficiency
Realizing Efficiencies Review of government roles and responsibilities indicates that single agency administration by Ministry of Agriculture for all provincial slaughter will improve efficiency, reduce stakeholder confusion and improve oversight. Ministry of Agriculture is also exploring the opportunity of working with FrontCounter BC to improve the licensing application process and promote better accessibility across the province.
Transferring administration of rural slaughter to Ministry of Agriculture also supports health authorities who may be unable to accommodate the demands of an increasing number of rural slaughter licences, especially during a global pandemic when their priority is addressing front line public health challenges.
Collaboration The transfer of responsibility for slaughter administration to Ministry of Agriculture will require ongoing collaboration with health authorities on food safety matters related to the food premises where meat products are processed and sold to the public. Improving collaboration between Ministry of Agriculture and health authorities will remain as important as ever to both partners and their shared interests in maintaining high standards for public health.
Animals raised for food must be treated humanely. Legislation is in place to require compliance with food safety and animal protection standards. Improved training as a component of the licensing requirements for rural operators and increased inspection oversight by Ministry of Agriculture inspectors along with ongoing training and education opportunities could further support good practices already being followed.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 9
Page 46 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
4. Strengthening our Provincial Food Supply
Local food supply security is an important matter
for British Columbians that has been highlighted
by the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting impacts
to the entire agriculture sector.
Increased Access to Local Meat Local producers depend on their reputation to maintain the viability of their business. Consumer demand has increased for local meat due to meat supply chain disruptions and the increased awareness of the importance of a resilient local food system. With increased demand for local supply, retailers will also seek sufficient reliable local supply where it is available. Increased inspection and compliance monitoring for rural operators to confirm that they are continuing to uphold standards will support food supply security and sustain high public confidence in the local meat supply.
Developing a resilient and diverse food supply chain for British Columbia can help to mitigate large scale production disruption. A change to rural slaughter administration at this time must highlight local food supply security, support for recovery of the agriculture sector, and consideration of evolving public health issues, including freeing up health resources needed to focus on front-line efforts.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 10
Page 47 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
This Intentions Paper is the latest step the B.C. Government is taking to create opportunities for livestock producers in rural parts of the province, and contributes to larger efforts to increase overall food production and security. The B.C. Government is strengthening our provincial food system and supporting economic activity through programs and policies like Grow BC, which connects farmers to the resources they need to farm, and Feed BC which results in more B.C. grown and processed foods served in public institutions like hospitals. The B.C. Government is also making it easier for consumers to identify products with a Buy BC label so they can enjoy trusted, local foods while supporting our communities and economy. To learn more about the programs and resources available to help farmers, fishers and food processors in B.C. please visit https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/agriculture- seafood/programs or contact the Ministry of Agriculture at 1-888-221-7141.
Providing Comment on Rural Slaughter Modernization
The Ministry of Agriculture will develop and finalize approaches suggested in this intentions paper and begin regulatory and policy change by late fall 2020.
Following review of comments and submissions, the Ministry of Agriculture will complete an action plan for implementation. Those interested are invited to submit comments by email to [email protected], or in writing to:
Ministry of Agriculture c/o B.C. Meat Inspection program PO Box 9120 Stn Prov Gov’t Victoria B.C. V8W 9B4
Comments should be made on or before October 19, 2020.
All submissions will be reviewed for inclusion in a summary report. Comments received will be treated with confidentiality and collected under section 26(c) of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA). Please note that comments you provide and information that identifies you as the source of those comments may be publicly available if a Freedom of Information request is made under FOIPPA. If you have questions about the collection of this information, please contact the Food Safety and Inspection Branch Policy and Project Analyst at 778 974-3349, or at the address provided above.
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 11
Page 48 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Appendix A: Graduated Slaughter Licensing System
# of Activities Sales Geographic AGRI Health Authority Licence Type Animal Permitted Permitted Scope Oversight Oversight Units Pre and post • Cut-and-wrap Slaughter Yes, retail slaughter (processing) Class A and cut-and- and direct to All of B.C. Unlimited inspection • Retail sales wrap consumer of each • Water testing animal Pre and post Yes, retail Slaughter slaughter Class B and direct to All of B.C. Unlimited Water testing only inspection consumer of each animal Licences restricted to prescribed • Periodic site N/A Slaughter regional districts assessments and (NOTE Dec only (own in the rural area audit of operational Yes, retail 1, 2020: animals and of B.C. slaughter records. Class D and direct to 1 - 25 slaughter other • Cut and wrap consumer administrat producers’ Sales restricted (processing) ion to animals) within the • Retail sales AGRI) regional district • Water testing where meat is produced • Periodic site N/A Direct to assessments and (NOTE Dec consumer audit of operational Slaughter Sales restricted 1, 2020: only slaughter records. Class E only (own within the 1 - 10 slaughter (farmgate • Cut and wrap animals only) regional district administrat and farm (processing) where meat is ion to market) • Retail sales produced AGRI) • Water testing Personal use - Slaughter For producer No licence None Unlimited N/A N/A only only required Note: “Animal unit" means a combined animal weight, when measured alive, of 455 kg (1 000 lbs).
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 12
Page 49 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Appendix B: Designated Regional Districts in Schedule 2 under the Meat Inspection Regulation
1. Central Coast Regional District 2. Kitimat-Stikine Regional District 3. Mount Waddington Regional District 4. qathet Regional District 5. North Coast Regional District 6. Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 7. Strathcona Regional District, other than the land located on Vancouver Island 8. Sunshine Coast Regional District 9. Northern Rockies Regional Municipality 10. Stikine Region 11. Alberni-Clayoquot Regional District 12. Regional District of Fraser-Fort George (Electoral Area ‘H’ only) 13. Regional District of Central Kootenay (Electoral Area ‘D’ only)
Ministry of Agriculture Intentions Paper: RURAL SLAUGHTER MODERNIZATION 13
Page 50 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch POLICY DIRECTIVE No: 20 - 26
Date: September 18, 2020
To: All Licensees All LCRB Staff All Industry Associations All local government, First Nations and police agencies
Re: Temporary Expanded Service Area, extension
Current Policy
Under the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation (LCLR), s.109.1, the General Manager (GM) of the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch (LCRB) may issue a Temporary Expanded Service Area (TESA) authorization to Food Primary, Liquor Primary, and Manufacturer licensees.
Under LCLR, s. 109.4 all TESA authorizations expire at the end of the day on October 31, 2020. Further, under LCLR s. 109.5, the TESA provisions in the LCLR will be repealed on October 31, 2020.
See Policy Directive 20-13 for further information.
New Policy
In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Province’s March 2020 declaration of a state of emergency and the Provincial Health Officer’s (PHO) March 2020 declaration of a public health emergency, this time-limited measure is being amended to support the PHO’s direction and recommendations.
The TESA provisions in the LCLR will now expire on October 31, 2021. Licensees may apply for new TESA authorizations up to this date.
The GM’s authority to extend existing approved TESA authorizations up to this date, without first requiring the licensee to make an application, has also been made explicit.
The LCRB is reaching out to local authorities with approved TESAs in their jurisdiction to confirm their support for extending the TESAs to October 31, 2021. To limit the risk of disruptions in service, local authorities must confirm their position with the LCRB by October 16, 2020.
Page 1 of 3
Page 51 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
If concerns related to public safety and public interest are raised regarding the TESA authorizations or the operation of particular TESAs, the LCRB will work with licensees and local authorities to ensure TESAs operate in a manner that balances the interests of licensees, municipalities and the general public.
If the local authority is supportive, the LCRB will reissue authorization letters to licensees with existing TESAs in that jurisdiction prior to October 31, 2020. The new authorization letter will provide an extended expiry date of the TESA. Unless a new authorization letter has been issued, the existing TESA will expire on October 31, 2020.
Licensees will not need to apply to the LCRB for an extension, and there will be no fee charged.
All other requirements relating to TESA authorizations remain the same. To meet the intent of this temporary authorization, licensees will not be permitted to increase or exceed their currently approved person/patron capacities or occupant loads. All means of access to the service area must also be supervised to the satisfaction of the GM. Finally, licensees must comply with all local bylaws and health and fire regulations.
Approved TESAs must be in compliance with local bylaws and requirements. If the local authority bylaws or requirements change and prevent the operation of TESAs in that jurisdiction, the local authority should advise the LCRB.
For licensees who are applying for new TESA authorizations, an expedited online application is available at no charge. Please check our website for a link to the application.
Explanation
The new policy is provided in the context of the provincial state of emergency and public health emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Extending TESA authorizations, which increase the size of existing service areas, is expected to support licensees in complying with requirements under the PHO and recommendations, in particular with respect to social/physical distancing.
Further Information
Further information regarding liquor and cannabis regulation and licensing in British Columbia is available on the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch website at http://www.gov.bc.ca/liquorregulationandlicensing
If you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch toll free in Canada at 1-866-209-2111 or 250 952-5787 if calling from the Victoria area.
Page 2 of 3
Page 52 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Disclaimer
This communication is intended to be used only for general informational purposes and may not apply to all situations. This communication does not constitute legal advice nor is it a comprehensive statement of the legal obligations that arise under the Liquor Control and Licensing Act, regulations, or any other applicable laws. When interpreting and applying the information contained in this communication, you are encouraged to seek specific advice from your professional advisors as appropriate in the circumstances.
Original signed by Mary Sue Maloughney, Assistant Deputy Minister and General Manager
Page 3 of 3
Page 53 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
REACH – Agricultural Accelerator Pilot Program
What If You Could Take Your Farm or Operation To The Next Level?
Do you…
• feel ready to grow your farm or operation but you’re not sure where to start? • need support finding your place in emerging markets? • look for a way to pivot day-to-day operations? • want support in developing a labour-attraction strategy? • wish you had one-to-one guidance for business coaching and accountability?
We hear you.
We are thrilled to announce our new business accelerator program created especially for agricultural businesses. With so many possibilities ahead, REACH provides you, the owners of North Okanagan farms and operations, with a resource to analyze your business and find new opportunities in our new economic reality.
Our first intake is set for October 2020. Apply now.
Page 54 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
Take Charge Of Your Agricultural Business With REACH
REACH is a business accelerator program designed to help farmers and processors like you gain the unique skills and opportunities needed to reach your goals.
REACH may be for you if you:
• have been running your farm or operation for more than two years • see opportunities for growth but need support to pursue them • are ready to take a deep dive into your operations to evaluate your Ag business’s strengths, weakness, gaps and needs • are motivated to commit the time to work on your Ag business An Action-Driven Program For Farmers and Processors
REACH – Agricultural Accelerator Pilot Program offers opportunities to:
• access specialized professionals to help you overcome knowledge gaps • achieve your goals through a structured business analysis process and custom action planning • receive targeted support and establish accountability through ongoing one-to-one professional coaching
For more information, please call 250-545-2215 ext 204.
Page 55 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
REACH Agricultural Accelerator Pilot FAQ
REACH: Home Program Application
Who is eligible for the REACH – Agricultural Accelerator Pilot Program?
REACH is an accelerator program designed for farmers and meat operators who have been operating in the North Okanagan region for a minimum of 2 years. The program is best suited to growth-minded agricultural business owners who are motivated to improve their operations and are open to new approaches.
Are there any types of agricultural businesses that are not eligible?
Yes. Businesses that are not eligible:
• franchises • multi-level marketing businesses • businesses that are not registered in British Columbia • businesses that are not operating in the North Okanagan Region
What is the application process?
Applicants will submit an application form which will be followed up with an in-person interview. During the interview we will be seeking more information about the applicant’s agricultural business and may discuss topics such as opportunities for growth, current operational priorities of the business, and the applicant’s capacity to fully engage with the program.
Unfortunately, not all applications will necessarily be accepted.
Page 56 of 57 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee
How much of my time will the program require?
You will engage in a detailed analysis of your operations as well as action planning and ongoing business development activities. The time spent on these activities will vary depending on the complexity of the business. You can expect anywhere from 20 to 60 hours of activity in the first 3 months as you complete the business analysis and action planning phase and then up to 10 hours per month on an ongoing basis.
Much of the business development work will be client-driven so the amount of time each client spends and the scheduling of business development activities will vary based on individual needs.
How long is the program?
The program runs until March 12, 2021.
What can I expect if I am accepted into the program?
The program is focused on providing support and resources to help agricultural businesses grow and improve. Key phases of the program include:
• comprehensive analysis of your business operations • action planning • exploration of market expansion opportunities • one-to-one coaching • connection with specialized professionals and mentors
Is there any funding available through the program?
Access to customized professional services (e.g.: accountants, lawyers, marketing experts, etc.), as well as training, workshops, and other opportunities for learning will be provided under the program.
REACH: Home Program Application
Page 57 of 57