Uhtay DMRWARE FUEL OIL the Bantly
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Babadzhanian, Hamazasp
Babadzhanian, Hamazasp Born: February 18th, 1906 Died: November 1st, 1977 (Aged 71) Ethnicity: Armenian Field of Activity: Red Army Brief Biography Hamazasp Khachaturi Babadzhanian was a Russian military general who served during multiple wars for the Soviet Union, rising to prominence during the Great Patriotic War. He was born in 1906 into an impecunious Armenian family in Chardakhlu, Azerbaijan. He attended a secondary school in Tiflis in 1915 but due to familial financial difficulties was forced to return home and toil in the fields on his family’s plot of land, later working as a highway worker during 1923-24. Babadzhanian joined the Red Army in 1925 and later attended a Military School in Yerevan in 1926, graduating as an officer in 1929, as well as joining the Soviet Communist Party in 1928. He received various postings, mopping up armed gangs in the Caucasus region in 1930 and aided in liquidating the Kulak revolt. Babadzhanian moved around frequently, generally within the Transcaucasus and Baku regions, until 1939-1940, when he served in the Finno-Soviet war. He played a pivotal role in numerous battles in World War 2, participating in the battle of Smolensk, as well as contributing a fundamentally in Yelnya, where he overcame a far superior German force. For his efforts in recapturing Stanslav he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. He provided support in Poland, as well fighting in Berlin, contributing to the capture of the Reichstag. After the Great Patriotic War Babadzhanian would prove crucial in quelling the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and some time after in 1975 became Chief Marshal of the Tank and Armoured Troops, a rank only he and one other attained. -
The Soviet Critique of a Liberator's
THE SOVIET CRITIQUE OF A LIBERATOR’S ART AND A POET’S OUTCRY: ZINOVII TOLKACHEV, PAVEL ANTOKOL’SKII AND THE ANTI-COSMOPOLITAN PERSECUTIONS OF THE LATE STALINIST PERIOD by ERIC D. BENJAMINSON A THESIS Presented to the Department of History and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts March 2018 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Eric D. Benjaminson Title: The Soviet Critique of a Liberator’s Art and a Poet’s Outcry: Zinovii Tolkachev, Pavel Antokol’skii and the Anti-Cosmopolitan Persecutions of the Late Stalinist Period This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts degree in the Department of History by: Julie Hessler Chairperson John McCole Member David Frank Member and Sara D. Hodges Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded: March 2018 ii © 2018 Eric D. Benjaminson iii THESIS ABSTRACT Eric D. Benjaminson Master of Arts Department of History March 2018 Title: The Soviet Critique of a Liberator’s Art and a Poet’s Outcry: Zinovii Tolkachev, Pavel Antokol’skii and the Anti-Cosmopolitan Persecutions of the Late Stalinist Period This thesis investigates Stalin’s post-WW2 anti-cosmopolitan campaign by comparing the lives of two Soviet-Jewish artists. Zinovii Tolkachev was a Ukrainian artist and Pavel Antokol’skii a Moscow poetry professor. Tolkachev drew both Jewish and Socialist themes, while Antokol’skii created no Jewish motifs until his son was killed in combat and he encountered Nazi concentration camps; Tolkachev was at the liberation of Majdanek and Auschwitz. -
Soviet Youth on the March: the All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965–87
This is a repository copy of Soviet Youth on the March: The All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965–87. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/96606/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Hornsby, R (2017) Soviet Youth on the March: The All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965–87. Journal of Contemporary History, 52 (2). pp. 418-445. ISSN 0022-0094 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009416644666 © 2016, The Author. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Journal of Contemporary History. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Soviet Youth on the March: the All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965-87 ‘To the paths, friends, to the routes of military glory’1 The first train full of young people pulled into Brest station from Moscow at 10.48 on the morning of 18 September 1965. -
German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941
University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2018 German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941 David Sutton University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1 University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Sutton, David, German Defeat/Red Victory: Change and Continuity in Western and Russian Accounts of June-December 1941, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2018. -
How Did the Red Army of the Soviet Union So Fiercely and Victoriously
The Story behind the Battle: How did the Red Army of the Soviet Union so fiercely and victoriously defend Stalingrad in 1942-43 despite the lack of trained officers, equipment, preparation, and morale in 1941? Carol Ann Taylor Student No. 30620882 Thesis for Honours Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History School of Social Sciences and Humanities Murdoch University 2012 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bachelor of Arts in History with Honours at Murdoch University, 2 November 2012 I declare that this thesis is a true account of my own work, unless indicated Signed: Carol Ann Taylor Date: 2 November 2012 Copyright Acknowledgement Form I acknowledge that a copy of this thesis will be held at Murdoch University Library. I understand that, under the provisions s51.2 of the Copyright Act 1968, all or part of this thesis may be copied without infringement of copyright where such a reproduction is for the purpose of study, and research. This statement does not signal any transfer of copyright away from the author. Signed: ................................................................................................ Full Name of Degree: Bachelor of Arts with Honours in History Thesis Title: The Story behind the Battle: How did the Red Army of the Soviet Union so fiercely and victoriously defend Stalingrad in 1942-43 despite the lack of trained officers, equipment, preparation, and morale in 1941? Author: Carol Ann Taylor Year: 2002 Abstract The victory over Axis forces by the Red Army during the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942-1943 is considered one of the major turning points of World War Two. -
Cold War 1949 — USSR Chair: Faris Omar JHUMUNC 2018
Quadrumvirate: Pacific Theater of the Cold War 1949 — USSR Chair: Faris Omar JHUMUNC 2018 Quadrumvirate: Pacific Theater of the Cold War- USSR Topic A: Preparing the USSR Against International Resistance to the Communist Movement Topic B: Strengthening Relations with Asian Nations and Establishing Communist Dominance Committee Overview every delegate represents a character, or historical individual, rather than a specific It is June 1949. The Cold War is well under country. Every directive, communiqué, press way and the Soviet Union is strong, but we are release, and portfolio request must accurately seeing threats from our western counterparts. reflect the viewpoints of the character. Truman’s Doctrine and blatant attempt to buy European loyalties with a “Marshall Plan” position the U.S. as a clear enemy of the Soviet Union. There Quadrumvirate is no better time than now to ally with our comrades in China and support Communist revolutions in the Organization Far East in order to maintain a position of power in China, Japan, South Korea, and USSR will this growing war. be functioning as a group of four committees, with It remains in the hands of our leader, Joseph interconnected crisis elements, in which all Stalin, and his 20 closest officials to push the Soviet debate in the individual committee rooms will Union ahead of the U.S. in this silent war. The impact the other three committees. While there constant threat brought about by the Atomic Era is are specific concerns that affect each room ever-looming, and the USSR and her allies must individually and with which delegates must remain steadfast in their beliefs, loyalty, and concern themselves, just as important is the courage. -
In March 1945, British Field Mar- Shal Bernard L. Montgomery Stood on the Rhine with Visions of a Triumphal Entry Into Berlin Da
n March 1945, British Field Mar- value. Except for a token presence, the the Allied powers would share control of shal Bernard L. Montgomery Reich ministries had moved out already. the city. Eisenhower was not willing to stood on the Rhine with visions The Soviet army was camped on the Oder, expend tens of thousands of lives for the of a triumphal entry into Berlin 35 miles from Berlin, with more than a prestige of taking territory that would be dancing in his head. It was Mont- million troops in position to attack. turned over to the Soviets as soon as the gomery’s expectation that in ad- The Battle of the Bulge in December war ended. Idition to his own 21st Army Group, he had sapped German strength in the west, Eisenhower also wanted an orderly would have command of the US Ninth but 61 divisions remained, with additional linkup with the Soviet forces, whose Army and an absolute priority on fuel pockets of strength in the Baltic states. emotions were running high as they swept and supplies. He would then make a Eisenhower’s plan was to advance on a through Germany. “What are your ideas 250-mile dash across the north German broad front, capture the industrial heart- on control and coordination to prevent plain to capture Berlin. land of the Ruhr, split Germany down the unfortunate incidents and to sort out the Prime Minister Winston Churchill middle, and consolidate Allied gains on two advancing forces?” Gen. George C. agreed with Montgomery’s assumptions the fl anks. -
Read Book Red Storm Over the Balkans: the Failed Soviet Invasion
RED STORM OVER THE BALKANS: THE FAILED SOVIET INVASION OF ROMANIA, SPRING 1944 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Colonel David M. Glantz | 424 pages | 15 Dec 2006 | University Press of Kansas | 9780700614653 | English | Kansas, United States Red Storm Over the Balkans: The Failed Soviet Invasion of Romania, Spring 1944 PDF Book For any other proposed use, contact the Reviews editorial staff at hbooks mail. Germany's Eastern Front in World War II saw many campaigns and battles that have been forgotten by a Soviet Union that tried to hide its military failures. Although Konev's and Malinovsky's offensives ultimately failed, the Red Army managed to inflict heavy losses on Axis forces, exacerbating the effects of Germany's defeats in the Ukraine and making it more difficult for the Wehrmacht to contain the Soviet juggernaut's ultimate advance toward Berlin. Liquidlasagna rated it really liked it Sep 18, He discloses General Ivan Konev's strategic plan as the 2nd Ukrainian Front prepared its Iasi offensive and fought a climactic battle with the German Eighth Army and its Romanian allies in the Tirgu-Frumos region in early May, then the regrouping of General Rodion Malinovsky's 3rd Ukrainian Front for its decisive offensive toward Kishinev, which aborted in the face of a skillful counterstroke by a threadbare German Sixth Army. Community Reviews. Glantz traces the 2nd Ukrainian Front's offensive along the Tirgu-Frumos, Iasi, and Dnestr River axes and the 3rd Ukrainian Front's simultaneous advance to the Dnestr River and dramatic struggle to seize bridgeheads across the river and capture Kishinev. -
Spring2018 Issue-All
SPRING 2018 - Volume 65, Number 1 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations. -
Report Forgive but Not Forget Pdf 0.5 MB
Valdai Discussion Club Report Forgive but Not Forget? The Image of War in Culture and Historical Memory Oleg Barabanov, Konstantin Pakhalyuk, Matthias Uhl valdaiclub.com #valdaiclub May 2020 The views and opinions expressed in this position paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Valdai Discussion Club, unless explicitly stated otherwise. ISBN 978-5-907318-04-5 © The Foundation for Development and Support of the Valdai Discussion Club, 2020 42 Bolshaya Tatarskaya st., Moscow, 115184, Russia About the Authors Oleg Barabanov Doctor of Political Science, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Programme Director at the Valdai Discussion Club, Professor of MGIMO University Konstantin Pakhalyuk Lecturer at MGIMO University, Chief Specialist and Supervisor on Educational Projects at the Russian Military History Society Matthias Uhl PhD in History, Research Fellow at Deutsches Historisches Institut, Moscow Contents Oleg Barabanov 3 Foreword: Memory of War and Wars of Memory Konstantin Pakhalyuk 7 Images of War in Modern Culture Images of war: Between historical memory and political pragmatism Heroic vs non-heroic societies Russia’s special path Matthias Uhl 28 May 8 in German Historical Memory May 8 as Liberation Day in the German Democratic Republic under Walter Ulbricht Shifting gears under Erich Honecker May 8 and the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1950s May 8 and the Federal Republic of Germany in the 1960s and 1970s 1980s: May 8 as Liberation Day in the Federal Republic of Germany May 8 in united Germany Forgive but Not Forget? The Image of War in Culture and Historical Memory 3 Oleg Barabanov Foreword: Memory of War and Wars of Memory Historical memory and how it is understood play a major role in forming civic solidarity, creating links between generations and making citizens feel like they have a personal stake in the state affairs. -
Fighting for Tyranny: How State Repression Shapes Military Performance
Fighting for Tyranny: How State Repression Shapes Military Performance Arturas Rozenas Roya Talibova Yuri M. Zhukov New York University University of Michigan University of Michigan [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] A state’s military power ultimately rests on the efforts of ordinary citizens in battle. But what if people see the state they are defending as unjust or even tyrannical? To investigate this question, we assemble a novel dataset from over 100 million declassified personnel records of Red Army conscripts in the Second World War, and detailed data on Stalin’s mass repression before the war. Results from three empirical designs show that soldiers from places with more pre-war repression were more likely to fight until death and less likely to flee, but they also displayed less initiative in battle. This finding underscores an overlooked negative externality of repression: past exposure to repression induces con- formity, which may help solve some principal agent problems associated with fighting, but it comes at the expense of military effectiveness and higher wartime casualties. October 2020 11,924 words When Soviet troops raised the red victory banner atop the Reichstag in 1945, they marked an end to the costliest military campaign in history. During the Great Patriotic War – the eastern front of World War II – the Soviet Union lost over 11.2 million military personnel and 17.9 million civilians (Surinov and Oksenoyt, 2015). Almost 40% of the battlefield losses comprised soldiers who were captured, surrendered, deserted, or went missing (Krivosheev, 1997). Incentives to avoid fighting were compelling. -
Russian Battles Over Historical Narratives: the Case of Prague’S Konev Statue
REPORT RUSSIAN BATTLES OVER HISTORICAL NARRATIVES: THE CASE OF PRAGUE’S KONEV STATUE 2020 EUROPEAN VALUES CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY European Values Center for Security Policy is a non-governmental, non-partisan institute defending freedom and sovereignty. We protect liberal democracy, the rule of law, and the transatlantic alliance of the Czech Republic. We help defend Europe especially from the malign influences of Russia, China, and Islamic extremists. We envision a free, safe, and prosperous Czechia within a vibrant Central Europe that is an integral part of the transatlantic community and is based on a firm alliance with the USA. Our work is based on individual donors. Use the form at: http://www.europeanvalues.net/o-nas/support- us/, or send your donation directly to our transparent account: CZ69 2010 0000 0022 0125 8162. www.europeanvalues.net [email protected] www.facebook.com/Evropskehodnoty Author David Stulík, Senior Analyst of the Kremlin Watch Program, European Values Center for Security Policy Acknowledgment to contributing authors: Zuzana Činčerová, Marco Cardinali This report has been prepared as a background paper for the second Czech-Polish workshop related to countering Russian disinformation & manipulation of historical facts. This workshop is to be held under the project supported by the Czech-Polish Forum. Image Copyright: Page 1: WikiPedia / Gampe Page 5: WikiPedia / gette 2 1. CONTEXT The recent escalation in relations between the Czech Republic and Russia, relating to the removal of a Marshal Konev statue, is just another case of Russia waging a “battle” with a post-Communist country over historical narratives. This certainly won’t be the last clash over the interpretation of historical events and presentation of the Soviet Union and its leaders.