2021 Monarch Award Master List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

2021 Monarch Award Master List Title Author Illustrator Publisher Be Kind Pat Zietlow Miller Jen Hill Roaring Books Press Can I Be Your Dog? Troy Cummings Troy Cummings Random House Cute as an Axolotl Jess Keating David DeGrand Alfred Knopf Douglas, You’re a Genius Ged Adamson Ged Adamson Schwartz & Wade Books Drawn Together Minh Lê Dan Santat Disney-Hyperion Dreamers Yuyi Morales Yuyi Morales Holiday House Publishing, Inc. The Good Egg Jory John Pete Oswald HarperCollins How to Give Your Cat a Bath Nicola Winstanley John Martz Tundra/Penguin Random House in Five Easy Steps If Sharks Disappeared Lily Williams Lily Williams Roaring Book Press King & Kayla and the Case of the Dori Hillestad Butler Nancy Meyers Peachtree Missing Dog Treats Let the Children March Monica Clark-Robinson Frank Morrison Houghton Mifflin My Papi Has a Motorcycle Isabel Quintero Zeke Peña Dial A Normal Pig K-Fai Steele K-Fai Steele Balzer & Bray Planting Stories: The Life of Anika Denise Paola Escobar HarperCollins Librarian and Storyteller Pura Belpré The Sun is Kind of a Big Deal Nick Seluk Nick Seluk Orchard Books Thank You, Omu! Oge Mora Oge Mora Little Brown and Company The Undefeated Kwame Alexander Kadir Nelson Versify Under My Hijab Hena Khan Aaliya Jaleel Lee & Low Books, Inc. What If… Samantha Berger Mike Curato Little Brown and Company What Is Chasing Duck? Jan Thomas Jan Thomas Houghton Mifflin Harcourt .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

President, Prime Minister, Or Constitutional Monarch?
I McN A I R PAPERS NUMBER THREE PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER, OR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH? By EUGENE V. ROSTOW THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL S~RATEGIC STUDIES I~j~l~ ~p~ 1~ ~ ~r~J~r~l~j~E~J~p~j~r~lI~1~1~L~J~~~I~I~r~ ~'l ' ~ • ~i~i ~ ,, ~ ~!~ ,,~ i~ ~ ~~ ~~ • ~ I~ ~ ~ ~i! ~H~I~II ~ ~i~ ,~ ~II~b ~ii~!i ~k~ili~Ii• i~i~II~! I ~I~I I• I~ii kl .i-I k~l ~I~ ~iI~~f ~ ~ i~I II ~ ~I ~ii~I~II ~!~•b ~ I~ ~i' iI kri ~! I ~ • r rl If r • ~I • ILL~ ~ r I ~ ~ ~Iirr~11 ¸I~' I • I i I ~ ~ ~,i~i~I•~ ~r~!i~il ~Ip ~! ~ili!~Ii!~ ~i ~I ~iI•• ~ ~ ~i ~I ~•i~,~I~I Ill~EI~ ~ • ~I ~I~ I¸ ~p ~~ ~I~i~ PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER, OR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH.'? PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER, OR CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH? By EUGENE V. ROSTOW I Introduction N THE MAKING and conduct of foreign policy, ~ Congress and the President have been rivalrous part- ners for two hundred years. It is not hyperbole to call the current round of that relationship a crisis--the most serious constitutional crisis since President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937. Roosevelt's court-packing initiative was highly visible and the reaction to it violent and widespread. It came to an abrupt and dramatic end, some said as the result of Divine intervention, when Senator Joseph T. Robinson, the Senate Majority leader, dropped dead on the floor of the Senate while defending the President's bill.
[Show full text]
Empire and English Nationalismn
Nations and Nationalism 12 (1), 2006, 1–13. r ASEN 2006 Empire and English nationalismn KRISHAN KUMAR Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA Empire and nation: foes or friends? It is more than pious tribute to the great scholar whom we commemorate today that makes me begin with Ernest Gellner. For Gellner’s influential thinking on nationalism, and specifically of its modernity, is central to the question I wish to consider, the relation between nation and empire, and between imperial and national identity. For Gellner, as for many other commentators, nation and empire were and are antithetical. The great empires of the past belonged to the species of the ‘agro-literate’ society, whose central fact is that ‘almost everything in it militates against the definition of political units in terms of cultural bound- aries’ (Gellner 1983: 11; see also Gellner 1998: 14–24). Power and culture go their separate ways. The political form of empire encloses a vastly differ- entiated and internally hierarchical society in which the cosmopolitan culture of the rulers differs sharply from the myriad local cultures of the subordinate strata. Modern empires, such as the Soviet empire, continue this pattern of disjuncture between the dominant culture of the elites and the national or ethnic cultures of the constituent parts. Nationalism, argues Gellner, closes the gap. It insists that the only legitimate political unit is one in which rulers and ruled share the same culture. Its ideal is one state, one culture. Or, to put it another way, its ideal is the national or the ‘nation-state’, since it conceives of the nation essentially in terms of a shared culture linking all members.
[Show full text]
Why Did Britain Become a Republic? > New Government
Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Why did Britain become a republic? Case study 2: New government Even today many people are not aware that Britain was ever a republic. After Charles I was put to death in 1649, a monarch no longer led the country. Instead people dreamed up ideas and made plans for a different form of government. Find out more from these documents about what happened next. Report on the An account of the Poem on the arrest of setting up of the new situation in Levellers, 1649 Commonwealth England, 1649 Portrait & symbols of Cromwell at the The setting up of Cromwell & the Battle of the Instrument Commonwealth Worcester, 1651 of Government http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Page 1 Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Case study 2: New government - Source 1 A report on the arrest of some Levellers, 29 March 1649 (Catalogue ref: SP 25/62, pp.134-5) What is this source? This is a report from a committee of MPs to Parliament. It explains their actions against the leaders of the Levellers. One of the men they arrested was John Lilburne, a key figure in the Leveller movement. What’s the background to this source? Before the war of the 1640s it was difficult and dangerous to come up with new ideas and try to publish them. However, during the Civil War censorship was not strongly enforced. Many political groups emerged with new ideas at this time. One of the most radical (extreme) groups was the Levellers.
[Show full text]
Mayors' Monarch Pledge
Mayors’ Monarch Pledge Action Items Mayors and local government chief executives who have taken the Mayors’ Monarch Pledge must commit to implement at least three of the 25 following action items within a year of taking the pledge. At least one action must be taken from the “Program & Demonstration Gardens” section. Mayors and local government chief executives taking more than eight actions will receive special recognition as part of the National Wildlife Federation’s Mayors’ Monarch Leadership Circle. NWF will follow up with all mayoral points of contact with a quarterly survey (1/1, 4/1, 7/1, 10/1) to monitor progress. Please visit www.nwf.org/mayorsmonarchpledge to take the pledge and access resources. Communications & Convening: 1) Issue a Proclamation to raise awareness about the decline of the monarch butterfly and the species’ need for habitat. 2) Launch a public communication effort to encourage citizens to plant monarch gardens at their homes or in their neighborhoods. 3) Communicate with community garden groups and urge them to plant native milkweeds and nectar-producing plants. 4) Convene city park and public works department staff and identify opportunities for revised mowing programs and milkweed / native nectar plant planting programs. 5) Convene a meeting with gardening leaders in the community to discuss partnerships to support monarch butterfly conservation. Program & Demonstration Gardens: 6) Host or support a native plant sale or milkweed seed giveaway event. 7) Facilitate or support a milkweed seed collection and propagation effort. 8) Plant a monarch-friendly demonstration garden at City Hall or another prominent location. 9) Convert abandoned lots to monarch habitat.
[Show full text]
Contextual Information Timelines and Family Trees Tudors to Windsors: British Royal Portraits 16 March – 14 July 2019
16 March — 14 July 2019 British Royal Portraits Exhibition organised by the National Portrait Gallery, London Contextual Information Timelines and Family Trees Tudors to Windsors: British Royal Portraits 16 March – 14 July 2019 Tudors to Windsors traces the history of the British monarchy through the outstanding collection of the National Portrait Gallery, London. This exhibition highlights major events in British (and world) history from the sixteenth century to the present, examining the ways in which royal portraits were impacted by both the personalities of individual monarchs and wider historical change. Presenting some of the most significant royal portraits, the exhibition will explore five royal dynasties: the Tudors, the Stuarts, the Georgians, the Victorians and the Windsors shedding light on key figures and important historical moments. This exhibition also offers insight into the development of British art including works by the most important artists to have worked in Britain, from Sir Peter Lely and Sir Godfrey Kneller to Cecil Beaton and Annie Leibovitz. 2 UK WORLDWIDE 1485 Henry Tudor defeats Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field, becoming King Henry VII The Tudors and founding the Tudor dynasty 1492 An expedition led by Italian explorer Christopher Columbus encounters the Americas 1509 while searching for a Western passage to Asia Henry VII dies and is succeeded Introduction by King Henry VIII 1510 The Inca abandon the settlement of Machu Picchu in modern day Peru Between 1485 and 1603, England was ruled by 1517 Martin Luther nails his 95 theses to the five Tudor monarchs. From King Henry VII who won the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, crown in battle, to King Henry VIII with his six wives and a catalyst for the Protestant Reformation 1519 Elizabeth I, England’s ‘Virgin Queen’, the Tudors are some Hernando Cortes lands on of the most familiar figures in British history.
[Show full text]
An Example of a Monarchy
An Example Of A Monarchy Man-made and logistical Jerry ratchets partially and protests his Anastasia parenthetically and grubbily. Coal-black Royal pivot: he tent his catamount varietally and inescapably. Alfonzo municipalized intemerately. From person of an example, who we release results in prisons and the arabian peninsula in iraq and They may appeal to the imperial solidarity had not be used as powerful voice of the globe also knows that had become leaders. Such work of power to a free to process your name, on both partners are women. Vote for example. Quizizz pro for example, monarchies in many official honours are? These resources that the barbarian monarchy, and new guinea and the authority over his secret of? Swaziland national monarchy an example sentence looks like tools, monarchies have legislatures and thus not. Kingdom and the kingdom of death. These are ones in the roman laws were no country that is relegated the circle which nation extends beyond their own names, no parliamentary affairs? Several monarchies even provide an example, monarchy and law and cultural festivals, but insisted that. In the button in our service positions, the teaching their favorite colors that citizens of the period were threatened by a royally appointed catholic. It found an example, monarchy are staying away monarchies are due to him in their power, while most parts of great cities like the. Unable to a monarchy an example of. Official site uses cookies that represent the countries have australians are you in the magnificent, and priceless moments in foreign war or military courts. And find itself and the nobles and security to take a single party leaders occupying roles, a monarchy an example of the monarchy explains why use.
[Show full text]
Political Succession and War in Europe, 1000–1799
THE KING IS DEAD: POLITICAL SUCCESSION AND WAR IN EUROPE, 1000–1799 ANDREJ KOKKONEN ANDERS SUNDELL WORKING PAPER SERIES 2017:9 QOG THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Box 711, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG September 2017 ISSN 1653-8919 © 2017 by Andrej Kokkonen & Anders Sundell. All rights reserved. The King is Dead: Political Succession and War in Europe, 1000–1799 Andrej Kokkonen Anders Sundeöö QoG Working Paper Series 2017:9 September 2017 ISSN 1653-8919 Andrej Kokkonen Anders Sundell Aarhus University The Quality of Government Institute Department of Political Science Department of Political Science [email protected] University of Gothenburg [email protected] We are grateful to Oeindrila Dube, Jørgen Møller, Johannes Lindvall, Jan Teorell, and seminar participants at Copenhagen University, Gothenburg University, Linköping University and the 2017 APSA meeting for comments on previous versions of the paper. 1 “The order of succession is not fixed for the sake of the reigning family; but because it is the interest of the state that it should have a reigning family.” - Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (1748) “The most plausible plea which hath ever been offered in favor of hereditary succession is, that it preserves a nation from civil wars; and were this true, it would be weighty; whereas it is the most bare-faced falsity ever imposed on mankind.” - Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776) Seldom is an autocratic regime as fragile as when the autocrat has died, and there is uncertainty—or outright disagreement—over who his successor will be. Conflicting claims to power can easily deteriorate into violent conflict between members of the regime (Acharya and Lee 2017; Brownlee 2007; Frantz and Stein 2017; Herz 1952; Kokkonen and Sundell 2017; Kurrild-Klitgaard 2000; Svolik 2012; Tullock 1987; Wang 2017), since violence is “the ultimate arbiter of political conflicts” in autocracies (Svolik 2012, 20).
[Show full text]
Age of Absolutism
Age of Absolutism Unit Introduction The Hapsburg Monarchy / Dynasty: Time Period and Name: The time period of 1550 – 1800 was a time when The Hapsburg Monarchy had been in place well before the year of 1500, but the world saw the emergence of the “Absolute Monarch”, which is a king or during the age of Absolutism the Hapsburg Monarchy was Europe’s most queen who has complete control over a country. This time period was powerful royal family. The Hapsburg Empire included Spain, Portugal, the preceded by the Age of Exploration and will fade with the Enlightenment, Holy Roman Empire (present day Germany, Netherlands, Austria, ending with the Age of Revolutions. Absolutism originated in Spain when Netherlands, Belgium, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia Luxembourg, Philip II was in power, and it began to fade out after the rule of Catherine the Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and parts of Poland, France and Italy), and the Great in Russia. Because this 250-year period saw the rise and fall of many empire in the Americas created by the Conquistadors (present day Mexico, absolute monarchs, it is known as the “Age of Absolutism”. Southwestern United States, and Northern South America). Needless to say, at one point in the Hapsburg Empire covered almost half of the known world Absolute Monarch Ideology: The ideology that absolute monarchs follow is at that time. Ruling this huge empire was a tough task that some met and called “absolutism”. All of the mentioned absolute monarchs were others did not. successful because they all followed the ideology, or belief, of absolutism to perfection.
[Show full text]
What Was the Magna Carta and How Did It Effect the Absolute Rule of England's Kings?
What was the Magna Carta and how did it effect the absolute rule of England’s kings? ¨ The Magna Carta is an English legal document that spells out certain rights for both the king and his subjects ú Created in 1215 ú “No one is above the law” ¨ Name is Latin for “Great Charter” or “Great Paper” ú Forerunner of the US Constitution ¨ The Magna Carta was created to curve the power of England’s absolute monarch ú King John I (1166-1216) ¨ English nobles confronted King John I and forced him to sign ú Used threats of civil war King John ruled England for almost two decades (1199-1216) and was well known as a heavy handed ruler. He would often wage unnecessary wars and burden his subjects with heavy taxes to pay for them. He also earned the hatred of his nobles and court by seducing their wives and daughters. Anyone who spoke out against him was imprisoned or executed King John meeting with his nobles during one of his many military campaigns King John begrudgingly signed the Magna Carta because he needed the barons to fight his wars and collect his taxes. The signing of the document did not prevent civil war, but it did establish the world’s first written constitution Magna Carta Memorial in Runnymede, England. This memorial marks the spot where King John supposedly signed the Magna Carta into law ¨ Sixty-three (63) total clauses or “rights” in the document ¨ Revolving around four (4) theme: ¡ Rule of law Restrictions on power of the government ¡ Fairness of the law Respect for traditions & property ownership ¡ Due process of the law Established courts / legal practices ¡ Respect for economic rights Freedom to conduct business 2.
[Show full text]
The Monarchs of Europe in the Age of AbsoluSm
The Monarchs of Europe In the Age of Absolu6sm A Centers Inves6gaon, Comparison, & Predic6on Ac6vity ©A Michele Luck Creaon! Available at hDp://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Michele-Lucks-Social-Studies Age of Absolu6sm A Period of rule by powerful monarchs in the 1500s and 1600s throughout Europe. Absolu6sm – absolute or Divine Right – the belief unlimited power in the that monarchs received hands of a monarch and their power from God, his or her advisors. An and therefore had absolute ruler would be absolute control over all granted their power things. Through divine through divine right and rule, one would create a would rule with complete beDer kingdom with and undoubted loyalty. harmony and efficiency. Age of Absolu6sm ATer years of chaos, confusion, and compeon across Europe, the monarchs of the 1500s worked to create stability for their kingdoms. To create this stability, kings and queens set out to unify territory, to establish effecve systems of government, and to create a sense of loyalty and obligaon among the people in their kingdoms. This would establish the leading countries of the world in the years between 1500 and 1600 in Europe. Europe during the Age of Absolu6sm Ac6vity Direc6ons • Visit each center as directed by your teacher. • Read the informaon cards, and view any images, quotes, or other primary sources provided. • Document the key facts onto your student handout, and discuss the staon ques6ons with your partners. • Once finished with all centers, return to your seat to complete the wrap-up ques6ons. • Be prepared to discuss all of the centers’ informaon with the class.
[Show full text]
Several Countries in Europe Come Under the Control of Absolute Monarchs, and Parliament Challenges the Monarch's Authority in Great Britain
Chapter 5: Absolute Monarchs in Europe, 1500–1800 Several countries in Europe come under the control of absolute monarchs, and Parliament challenges the monarch's authority in Great Britain. French King Louis XIV with plans for Versailles. Section 1: Spain’s Empire and European Absolutism During a time of religious and economic instability, Philip II rules Spain with a strong hand. Absolutism in Europe The Theory of Absolutism • Rulers want to be absolute monarchs— rulers with complete power • Believe in divine right— idea that monarchs represent God on earth Growing Power of Europe’s Monarchs • Decline of feudalism, rise of cities help monarchs gain power • Decline in Church authority also increases power Crises Lead to Absolutism • The 17th century is period of great upheaval • Monarchs impose order by increasing their own power A Powerful Spanish Empire A New Spanish Ruler • In 1556, Philip II begins ruling Spain and its possessions Philip II’s Empire • Philip seizes Portugal in 1580 • Gold and silver from the Americas make Spain extremely wealthy Defender of Catholicism • Philip defends Catholicism against Muslims, Protestants • Spanish fleet helps defeat Ottomans at Lepanto in 1571 Phillip II • Spanish Armada defeated by British in 1588 Doménikos Golden Age of Spanish Art Theotokópoulos and Literature (El Greco) El Greco and Velázquez • El Greco uses unusual style to convey religious themes • Works of Velázquez show Diego Velázquez Spanish court life Don Quixote • In 1605, Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes is published • Novel marks
[Show full text]
Hegel on Sovereignty and Monarchy
Santa Clara University Scholar Commons Philosophy College of Arts & Sciences Fall 2015 Hegel on Sovereignty and Monarchy Philip J. Kain Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/phi Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Social Justice Commons Recommended Citation Kain, P. J. “Hegel on Sovereignty and Monarchy,” Idealistic Studies, 45 (2015): 265-77. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Kain, P. J. “Hegel on Sovereignty and Monarchy,” Idealistic Studies, 45 (2015): 265-77, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org10.5840/idstudies20169248. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hegel on Sovereignty and Monarchy Philip J. Kain Santa Clara University Abstract Hegel is not a democrat. He is a monarchist. But he wants monarchy because he does not want strong government. He wants to deemphasize power. He develops an idealist conception of sovereignty that allows for a monarch less powerful than a president—one whose task is to expresses the unity of the state and realize the rationality inherent in it. A monarch needs to be a conduit through which reason is expressed and actualized, not a power that might obstruct this process. I. It must be admitted that Hegel is not much of a democrat. He relegates democracy to a past
[Show full text]