The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia Attiq-Ur-Rehman Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America Qu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia Attiq-Ur-Rehman Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America Qu The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia By Attiq-ur-Rehman Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan 2019 The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia By Attiq-ur-Rehman Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan 2019 The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia A dissertation submitted to Area Study Centre in partial fulfilment for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in American Studies By Attiq-ur-Rehman Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan 2019 Plagiarism Undertaking I declare that the research work done in the dissertation titled The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia is solely my research work, with no major contribution from any other person. The thesis has been written by me, however, small contribution taken has been duly acknowledged. I comprehend the strict rules and regulations of the HEC, Quaid-i-Azam University and Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America, Islamabad regarding plagiarism. I, therefore, as an author of the thesis declare that no portion of the dissertation has been plagiarized and any material used as reference is properly referred/ cited. I undertake that if I found guilty for any formal plagiarism in my dissertation even after the award of Ph. D Degree, the university has the right to suspend my degree. _________________________ Attiq ur Rehman PhD Student, Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. Dedicated To My Mother ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am grateful to Dr. Nauman Sattar, Area Study Centre for Africa, North & South America, whose kind suggestions and encouragement enabled me to accomplish this dissertation. I cannot find the appropriate words to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Professor Dr. Zafar Nawaz Jaspal, School of Politics and International Relations (SPIR), Quaid-i-Azam University, for providing continuous guidance and encouragement. His appreciation and supervision made the completion of this task possible. I would also like to thank Dr. Zafar Iqbal Cheema, Dr. Zulfqar Khan, Brig. (R) Tughral Yamin, whose suggestions and support enabled me to complete this study. Moreover, I am highly thankful and show my immense respect to my colleagues, Dr. Sarwat Rauf and Mr. Ghazanfar Ali Grewal, for supporting me morally and academically during my research and accommodating me in my professional engagements for the completion this task. I am also grateful to my family, especially Mr. & Mrs. Adnan Munir Baig and all of my friends. They provided me moral support and stood by me whenever I needed them. Attiq-ur-Rehman July 2019 The United States and Nuclear Politics of South Asia Attiq-ur-Rehman CONTENTS ABSTRACT i Introduction 01 1. Significance of Study 06 2. Statement of Problem 26 3. Hypothesis 28 4. Research Methodology 29 5. Organization of the Study 30 CHAPTER.1 Theoretical Framework 33 1. Philosophical Contextualization 38 2. Defining Anarchy 40 3. Other Assumptions 43 4. Power Politics 49 5. Security in an Anarchical World 51 6. Anarchy in a Nuclear World 57 7. Nuclear Arms in South Asia 62 8. International System and Regional Sub-Systems 68 9. Regional Sub-Systems and South Asia 70 CHAPTER.2 Pak-US Strategic Nexus: Inception, Evolution, and Continuity 75 1. Exploring of US Alliance 79 1.1. Ideological Cohesions 86 1.2. Territorial Politics 92 1.3. Military Aid 96 1.4. Economic Assistance 100 2. Geostrategic Interests 102 3. Cooperative Foundations of Bilateralism 107 4. Beijing-Islamabad-Washington Axis 111 5. Smiling Buddha: Responses from Islamabad and Washington 114 6. Shadows of the Afghan War 119 7. Bilateral Values in the Post-Cold War Era 122 8. US Dilemma during Sanctions 125 9. War against Terrorism 132 10. Afghanistan Conundrum 138 11. Post-Nuclearized South Asia 143 12. Indo-US Nuclear Deal and Pakistan 145 13. Estranged Pak-US Ties 148 14. Post-Nuclearized Indo-Pak Hostility 153 15. The US and South Asian Regional Order 160 16. Concluding Analysis 164 CHAPTER.3. Indo-US Strategic Nexus: Inception, Evolution, and Continuity 168 1. Indian Strategic Thinking 179 2. Evolution of Indo-US Bilateralism 185 3. India’s Concern on Pak-US Relations 191 4. Indian Non-Alignment Policy 196 5. The Regional Belligerence of India 202 6. Indo-China Border Clash 208 7. Indo-Pak Wars and the US Role 215 8. Smiling Buddha: An Irritant in Indo-US Relations 219 9. Aftermaths of Smiling Buddha 224 10. India-United States in the Post-Cold War Era 230 11. Post-Nuclearized South Asia 235 12. Post Nuclearized Indo-Pak Hostility 240 13. Indo-US Nuclear Deal 243 14. Two-sided Strategic Bilateralism 246 15. Strengthening of Multidimensional Rations 251 16. India and World Politics 257 17. Modi and Global Power Politics 261 18. US, India and World Politics 266 19. Concluding Analysis 271 CHAPTER.4. The Evolving Contours of US South Asia Policy 276 1. Cold War and Soviet Union 281 2. Cold War Geopolitics and Soviet Union 287 3. The Perplexing Bilateralism of the US 294 4. What is De-Hyphenation in World Politics 303 5. Washington’s De-Hyphenation Policy 304 6. Indo-US Civil Nuclear Cooperation 310 7. The Efforts to Uphold India in World Politics 314 8. Balancing Rising China 317 9. Pakistan-China Relations under CPEC 321 10. Indian Global Outreach 327 11. The US Restructuring in Asian Context 333 12. South Asian Politics and United States 341 13. Options for Re-Hyphenation Policy 349 14. Concluding Analysis 354 CHAPTER.5. Conclusion 359 BIBLIOGRAPHY 381 Annexures 433 Abstract The nuclear politics of South Asia – in the context of the protracted India-Pakistan conflict – has become one of the most debated topic of contemporary international systems analysis. During the four decades long US-USSR Cold War rivalry, South Asia was an epicentre of great power politics. The standing of New Delhi and Islamabad and their hostile relationship proved centrally important in the wider context of extra-regional power between the United States and Soviet Union. The importance of both India and Pakistan in the Cold War resulted in the US active involvement in the region and placed eventually both India and Pakistan with the United States. The proliferation of overt nuclear weapons in South Asia further intensified the role of United States in the politics of nuclearized subcontinent. The opening of complex bilateral relations by President Bill Clinton and initiation of a global war on terror by President George W. Bush marked a new chapter in the history of subcontinent for both of the principal contestants of South Asia. Subsequently, the administrations of Obama and Trump continued the policy of bilateralism and generated a plan of de-hyphenation for New Delhi and Islamabad by establishing separate relations with India and Pakistan. The strategic consequences of the US bilateral policy intensified the American role in South Asia, moving India closer to the US, while critically re-examining and re-evluating the standing of Pakistan in the region simultaneously. Hence, the trilateral strategic relations between the United States, India, and Pakistan structured an American South Asian policy that proved ultimately to be perplexing. Indo-US and Pak-US complex relations have proven to be complex and, in past, reflect a dichotomy in American South Asian relations. Now, it is difficult to separate the American role from strategic competition of India and Pakistan. This dissertation is an effort to provide a scholarly dimension to the American South Asian engagement, which encompasses a complex and an extensive record of cooperative and estranged diplomatic interaction. Moreover, this study is an attempt to comprehend the triangular relationship of i power between these. The theoretical conception of neorealism is applied to understand the South Asian nuclear arms race and its persistent growth in the presence of extra-regional powers. The interconnectedness of South Asian regional sub-system to greater international system carried the debate in this research which attempted to emphasize particularly the US engagement with India and Pakistan. In the end, the research endeavoured to craft a proposed the future scenarios of US South Asian engagement. ii Introduction The presence of nuclear weapons in South Asia amidst the vicious strategic competition between India and Pakistan has made the region a nuclear flash point. The overt nuclearization in 1998, with the proclamation of nuclear weapon capabilities by New Delhi and Islamabad, further intensified the already fragile regional security environment of the region. Coupled with the rapidly growing strategic contest between India and Pakistan, the nuclear weapons dramatically altered intricate dynamics of the regional strategic equilibrium. According to the Realist, security continues to be the primary imperative behind the nuclear race in South Asia. However, the Neorealist school of thought factors in the structural foundations of international system, which expounds that India acquired the nuclear weapons to deter China which escalated into an endless nuclear race in the region by heightening the threat perception for Pakistan. Pakistan’s quest for acquiring nuclear armed status after the 1971 Indo-Pakistan War led to the fall of East Pakistan. The tragedy of 1971 shaped the strategic preferences of Pakistan’s security establishment vis-à-vis malicious Indian ambitions towards the territorial integrity of Pakistan. Indira Gandhi’s ‘peaceful’ nuclear explosions, conducted on May 18 1974, became a strong stimulus for Pakistan to achieving nuclear status. Consequently, the South Asian nuclear arms race began to unfold which attracted the attentions of international strategic community. The prevailing trends in the South Asian nuclear arms race occurred and forced a competitive strategic environment. The Indo-Pak hostility cemented in inflexible national standings, incompatible bilateral positions on several issues of regional and international significance along with several conflicting claims against each other continuously stirring a strategic competition.
Recommended publications
  • What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's U.S. Visit
    What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s U.S. Visit By Caroline Wadhams and Aarthi Gunasekaran September 25, 2013 Despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East, the Obama administration continues its steady pursuit of a foreign policy makeover, reorienting its attention and resources to the Asia-Pacific—specifically India. Following a number of high-level visits by American officials to India, including Vice President Joe Biden’s trip in July and Secretary of State John Kerry’s trip in June, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will meet with President Barack Obama tomorrow during his second official trip to Washington as prime minister.1 During the meeting, President Obama and Prime Minister Singh will likely focus on the following six issues in the U.S.-India relationship: • Trade and investment • Defense cooperation • The U.S.-India civil nuclear deal • Climate change and clean energy • Immigration reform • Security issues and the strategic partnership 1 Center for American Progress | What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s U.S. Visit For the Obama administration, underlying these discussions will be the unmet expecta- tions of the U.S.-India relationship, a relationship envisioned as the cornerstone of the U.S. rebalance to the Asia-Pacific. While there were high hopes following the U.S.-India civil nuclear deal in 2008 and Prime Minister Singh’s 2009 visit to Washington, many U.S. policymakers have been disappointed by the Indian government’s failure to deepen the partnership by implementing the civil nuclear deal, making India more open to investment opportunities for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reemergence of Legacy Threats to Europe: Nato Needs to Change Its Focus
    THE REEMERGENCE OF LEGACY THREATS TO EUROPE: NATO NEEDS TO CHANGE ITS FOCUS Maj Kendra Hartery JCSP 43 DL PCEMI 43 AD Exercise Solo Flight Exercice Solo Flight Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs do not represent Department of National Defence or et ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used Ministère de la Défense nationale ou des Forces without written permission. canadiennes. Ce papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2018. le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2018. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 43 DL – PCEMI 43 AD 2017 – 2018 EXERCISE SOLO FLIGHT – EXERCICE SOLO FLIGHT THE REEMERGENCE OF LEGACY THREATS TO EUROPE: NATO NEEDS TO CHANGE ITS FOCUS Maj Kendra Hartery “This paper was written by a student “La présente étude a été rédigée par un attending the Canadian Forces College stagiaire du Collège des Forces in fulfilment of one of the requirements canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une des of the Course of Studies. The paper is a exigences du cours. L'étude est un scholastic document, and thus contains document qui se rapporte au cours et facts and opinions, which the author contient donc des faits et des opinions alone considered appropriate and que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et correct for the subject. It does not convenables au sujet.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friends and Supporters of the Cold War Museum, We Are Pleased
    Dear Friends and Supporters of The Cold War Museum, We are pleased with our advancements and look forward to locating at the Lorton Nike Missile Base upon approval from Fairfax County Park Authority later this year. Our site feasibility study, which was recently completed by George Mason University Professor Steven Fuller, indicates that The Cold War Museum located at the Lorton Nike site would draw over 300,000 visitors per year. I would like to thank Delegate Vince Callahan for submitting a 2004 Bill to support the Cold War Museum through a Nonstate Agency Grant. If you live in Virginia, call your legislators and let them know they should support the Cold War Museum. It saddens me to inform you of the passing of two of our supporters, Earl E. Myers and Commander Lloyd "Pete" Bucher. Earl was involved with the early RB-29 overhead and related reconnaissance programs and Commander Bucher was in charge of the USS Pueblo when captured by North Korea in 1968. Earl helped promote The Cold War Museum to a variety of Cold War veterans. Commander Bucher donated several items associated with the USS Pueblo Incident to the Museum, which we will proudly display in the near future. If you wish to become acquainted with Earl Myers life story, go to www.rb-29.net/HTML/biomaster/bioeemyers/00.25eemyerscvr.htm. For more information on Commander Bucher visit www.usspueblo.org and www.coldwar.org/articles/60s/pueblo.html. I am please to announce that Scott L'Ecuyer has agreed to be our Cold War Times editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Facing Diplomacy: Asian American and Pacific Islander Diplomats
    Facing Diplomacy: United States Asian American and Pacific Islander Diplomats Sources Stories and resources centered around the unique experiences, challenges, and achievements of diverse American diplomats. *This resource will be periodically updated* Amemiya Kikuchi, Yuriko (Principal Dancer, Martha Graham Company) Primary Sources ● Charles KiKuchi Papers, University of California Secondary Sources ● Briones, Matthew M. Jim and Jap Crow: A Cultural History of 1940s Interracial America. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2012. Media Sources ● Image, UC Berkeley, Bancro Library ● Martha Graham in Performance ● Online Computer Library Center: Yuriko Additional Online Resources ● Hayakawa, Mana. 2018. “Dancing Alien, Enemy, and Ally: Yuriko Amemiya’s Negotiations of Race, Gender, and Citizenship.” PhD. diss. University of California, Los Angeles ● McGehee, Helen. Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 11, no. 1 (1993): 99-103. Arvizu, Alexander A. Overseas Diplomatic Service ● U.S. Ambassador to Albania (2010-2015) ● Deputy Chief of Mission ○ Thailand (2004-2007) ○ Cambodia (2000-2003) 1 Deputy Assistant Policy for East Asia and Pacific ○ Korea and Japan (2007-2009) Primary Sources ● Ambassador Arvizu Article “Time to End Modern Slavery in Albania”, 2014 ● ThePolitic.org interview Media Resources ● Ambassador Alexander A. Arvizu Additional Online Resources ● State Department Archives ● Foreign Service Journal, May 2018 ● U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian Bloch, Chang, Julia, First U.S. Ambassador of Asian American Pacific Islander Descent Overseas Diplomatic Service ● U.S. Ambassador to Nepal (1989-1993) Primary Sources ● Julia Chang Bloch’s “Whole of Mission Approach in Nepal” ● Oral history 1993, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training ● Dept. of State 2016, Interview with first Asian American Ambassador Secondary Sources ● “Julia Chang Bloch: Breaking Barriers, Building Bridges,” China Daily, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Powers Slide
    95th ERAU Prescott Aviation History Presentation THE U-2 INCIDENT: A SON'S SEARCH FOR THE Spy Pilot TRUTH Francis Gary Powers Jr. is the son of Francis Gary and Claudia “Sue” Powers. Gary holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Philosophy from California State University, Los Angeles, and a Master’s Degree in Public Administration / Certification in Non-profit Management from George Mason University (GMU), Fairfax, Virginia. He will graduate this year with his Master’s Degree in U.S. History from Adams State University, Alamosa, CO. Gary is the Founder and Chairman Emeritus of The Cold War Museum, a 501(c) (3) charity located at Vint Hill, VA 45 minutes west of Washington, DC. He founded the museum in 1996 to honor Cold War veterans, preserve Cold War history, and educate future generations about this time period. As Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee for the Cold War Theme Study he works with the National Park Service and leading Cold War experts to identify historic Cold War sites for commemorating, interpreting, and preservation. Recently, he consulted for a JOIN US AS WE HEAR FRANCIS GARY Steven Spielberg Cold War thriller, Bridge of Spies, about James Donovan who brokered the 1962 spy exchange POWERS, JR. DISCUSS SPIELBERG’S MOVIE between KGB spy Rudolph Abel and CIA U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers, Sr. BRIDGE OF SPIES, THE CONTROVERSERY THAT SURROUNDED THE U-2 INCIDENT, AND WHAT IT WAS LIKE TO BE HELD IN SOVIET Gary is the author of Letters from a Soviet Prison (2017) and Spy Pilot (2019) CAPTIVITY DURING THE COLD WAR NOV.
    [Show full text]
  • USSYP 2010 Yearbook.Pdf
    THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS DIRECTORS William Randolph Hearst III UNTED STATE PESIDENTR James M. Asher Anissa B. Balson David J. Barrett S Frank A. Bennack, Jr. SE NAT E YO John G. Conomikes Ronald J. Doerfler George R. Hearst, Jr. John R. Hearst, Jr. U Harvey L. Lipton T Gilbert C. Maurer H PROGR A M Mark F. Miller Virginia H. Randt Paul “Dino” Dinovitz EXCUTIE V E DIRECTOR F ORT Rayne B. Guilford POAR GR M DI RECTOR Y - U N ITED S TATES SE NATE YOUTH PROGR A M E IGHT H A N N U A L WA S H INGTON WEEK 2010 sponsored BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM FUNDED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL WASHINGTON WEEK H M ARCH 6 – 1 3 , 2 0 1 0 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET · SUITE 1212 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504 WWW.USSENATEYOUTH.ORG Photography by Jakub Mosur Secondary Photography by Erin Lubin Design by Catalone Design Co. “ERE TH IS A DEBT OF SERV ICE DUE FROM EV ERY M A N TO HIS COUNTRY, PROPORTIONED TO THE BOUNTIES W HICH NATUR E A ND FORTUNE H AV E ME ASURED TO HIM.” —TA H O M S J E F F E R S ON 2010 UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGR A M SENATE A DVISORY COMMITTEE HONOR ARY CO-CH AIRS SENATOR V ICE PRESIDENT SENATOR HARRY REID JOSEPH R. BIDEN MITCH McCONNELL Majority Leader President of the Senate Republican Leader CO-CH AIRS SENATOR SENATOR ROBERT P.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Race and Arms Race in the Western Media and the Czechoslovak Media
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION Department of English Language and Literature Space Race and Arms Race in the Western Media and the Czechoslovak Media Bachelor thesis Brno 2017 Thesis Supervisor: Author: Mgr. Zdeněk Janík, M.A., Ph.D. Věra Gábová Annotation The bachelor thesis deals with selected Second World War and Cold War events, which were embodied in arms race and space race. Among events discussed are for example the first use of ballistic missiles, development of atomic and hydrogen bombs, launching the first artificial satellites etc. The thesis focuses on presentation of such events in the Czechoslovak and the Western press, compares them and also provides some historical facts to emphasize subjectivity in the media. Its aim is not only to describe the period as it is generally known, but to contrast the sources of information which were available at those times and to point out the nuances in the media. It explains why there are such differences, how space race and arms race are related and why the progress in science and technology was so important for the media. Key words The Second World War, the Cold War, space race, arms race, press, objectivity, censorship, propaganda 2 Anotace Tato bakalářská práce se zabývá některými událostmi druhé světové a studené války, které byly součástí závodu ve zbrojení a závodu v dobývání vesmíru. Mezi probíranými událostmi je například první použití balistických raket, vývoj atomové a vodíkové bomby, vypuštění první umělé družice Země atd. Práce se zaměřuje na prezentaci těchto událostí v Československém a západním tisku, porovnává je a také uvádí některá historická fakta pro zdůraznění subjektivity v médiích.
    [Show full text]
  • 1000+ Question Series PDF -Jklatestinfo
    JKLATEST INFO https://jklatestinfo.com/ Q1) The kashmir Valley was originally a huge lake called ? a) Manesar b) Neelam c) Satisar d) Both ‘b’ & ‘c’ Q2) Kalhana , a famous historian wrote ? a) Nilmatpurana b) Rajtarangini c) Both d) None of these Q3) The First king mentioned by Kalhana is ? a) Gonanda I b) Durlabha Vardhana c) Ashoka d) Jalodbhava Q4) The outer plains doesn’t cover which of the following ? a) RS Pura b) Kathua c) Akhnoor d) Udhampur Q5) When J&K became Union Territory ? a) August 5, 2019 b) October 31, 2019 c) September 5, 2019 d) October 1 , 2019 JKLATEST INFO https://jklatestinfo.com/ Q6) Which among the following is the welcome dance for spring season ? a) Bhand Pathar b) Dhumal c) Kud d) Rouf Q7) Total number of districts in J&K ? a) 22 b) 21 c) 20 d) 18 Q8) On which hill the Vaishno Devi Mandir is located ? a) Katra b) Trikuta c) Udhampur d) Aru Q9) The SI unit of charge is ? a) Ampere b) Coulomb c) Kelvin d) Watt Q10) The filament of light bulb is made up of ? a) Platinum b) Antimony c) Tungsten d) Tantalum JKLATEST INFO https://jklatestinfo.com/ Q11) Battle of Plassey was fought in ? a) 1757 b) 1857 c) 1657 d) 1800 Q12) Indian National Congress was formed by ? a) WC Bannerji b) George Yuli c) Dada Bhai Naroji d) A.O HUme Q13) The Tropic of cancer doesn’t pass through ? a) MP b) Odisha c) West Bengal d) Rajasthan Q14) Which of the following is Trans-Himalyan River ? a) Ganga b) Ravi c) Yamuna d) Indus Q15) Rovers cup is related to ? a) Hockey b) Cricket c) Football d) Cricket JKLATEST INFO https://jklatestinfo.com/
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-Us Strategic Partnership Implications for Pakistan
    INDO-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by ASHFAQ AHMED MAILK SCHOOL OF POLITICS AND INTERNTIONAL RELATIONS QUAID-I-AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD SEPTEMBER 2018 i APPROVAL The PhD thesis titled “INDO-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN” has been carried out by Ashfaq Ahmed Malik, under my supervision. The work is approved for evaluation by the foreign referees. Dr. Nazir Hussain Professor/Supervisor ii DECLARATION The PhD thesis “INDO-US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP: IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN” is based on the original research. No part of the thesis is copied or plagiarized; all sources are properly documented as per the guidance provided by the QAU/HEC. Ashfaq Ahmed Malik iii DEDICATION To my mother who is my everything iv CONTENTS ABSTRACT vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii ABBREVIATIONS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 15 1.1 A Balance of Power Approach 1.2 Statist/Unitary Actor Approach 1.3 Sovereignty 1.4 National interest 1.5 Rational Choice 1.6 Hegemonic Stability and Consolidation 1.7 Theoretical Construct 1.8 Application of Theoretical Construct CHAPTER 2: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS 37 2.1 Evolution of Indio-US Strategic Partnership 2.2 Post Independence: 1960-1974 2.3 1974 till End of Cold War Era 2.4 Post Cold War Era 2.5 Nuclear Explosions by India and Pakistan 2.6 Bush Transformation Era 2.7 India-US Defense Deal 2.8 India-US Defense Trade 2.9 Other Areas of Interests between
    [Show full text]
  • Waging Peace: an Eisenhower Exhibit for the Classroom
    NATIONAL EISENHOWER MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS LESSON Waging Peace: An Eisenhower Exhibit for the Classroom Duration One 45-minute period Grades 7–12 Cross-curriculum Application U.S. History, World History NATIONAL EISENHOWER MEMORIAL LESSON: WAGING PEACE | 1 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS Historical Background Dwight Eisenhower believed that the post-World War II world had an opportunity to enjoy an era of peace and prosperity following the ravages of depression and world war. However, just a few months after his election as president in 1952, he faced the complications of a rapidly chang- ing world. The long-time leader of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin, died, and no one knew who the next leader would be or whether their attitude toward the United States might be less cooper- ative. The United States had developed a new and vastly more destructive weapon, the hydrogen bomb, in November 1952, and the Soviet Union would also develop its own hydrogen bomb the following year. Within the context of these events, President Eisenhower outlined his views on the role of the United States in the world in a speech entitled “A Chance for Peace.” In it, Eisenhower stressed that Americans and other free nations had chosen one road and the Soviet Union had chosen another. As a result, fear and mistrust created the need for arms, armies, and nuclear weapons when all of the money spent for these items could be used to give the neediest people of the world necessities such as food, housing, and health care. Eisenhower believed that “all people want peace” (as he stated in a speech at a People to People Conference) and that the average person could make a real difference toward ensuring world peace.
    [Show full text]
  • AMCHAM India Sectoral Committees 2017-18 Keeping the Members’ Interest Foremost, the Committees Focus on the Following
    AMCHAM 1 AMCHAM 2 AMCHAM indexIndex 1. Chairman’s Message 02 2. Director General CEO’s Report 04 3. National Executive Board 2017 - 18 07 4. Sectoral Committees 2017 - 18 10 5. Membership 2017 - 18 12 6. Analysis of Events Organized by AMCHAM during 2017 - 18 13 7. New Members 2017 - 18 14 8. Highlights of the Year 2017 - 18 16 AMCHAM Chairman’s Message The world economy has been showing signs of growth notwithstanding the rising trade protectionism and financial market volatility. The Indian economy, on the other hand, continues to be one of the fastest growing. In the last 3 to 4 years, the Indian government has unveiled a string of reforms including two big bang reforms like the GST and demonetization which allowed the Indian economy to move into a cashless economy. Early this year, the Indian government raised FDI caps in several sectors and eased FDI rules for single brand retail (allowing 100% FDI in single brand under automatic route), non - banking financial companies and construction. These measures will enable India to increase its share in the global FDI inflow. Foreign investors have responded positively by bringing new investments or expanding their existing investments and remain optimistic of India’s growth story. Thus, 2018 will be a year of consolidation and it is predicted that the economy will grow by more than 7%. The U.S. - India strategic partnership continues to grow. This relationship has seen many pluses in the recent past. • Bilateral trade has more than doubled since 2006 and is estimated to reach $ 140 billion in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • India–US Relations in the Age of Uncertainty: an Uneasy Courtship
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 19:57 02 December 2016 India–US Relations in the Age of Uncertainty In the initial phase of the Obama administration, India’s ruling class and strategic community formed a perception that the spirit of strategic partnership between the two countries might be diluted on account of China looming large in the priorities of this administration. Despite occasional hiccups in their relationship, this perception was overshadowed by the administration’s recognition of India’s role as counterweight to China in the Asia-Pacific region. This book addresses and re-evaluates the perceptions, policies and perspectives of public policy makers and bureaucratic elites in both India and the US in setting and articulating the tone, tenor and substance of the multi-faceted ties between the two countries. The scope of the book is not exclusively limited to the bilateral relationship in the critical areas such as the Indo-US nuclear deal, defence, security, and strategic partnership. Its concerns and ramifications are much wider in global and regional contexts, covering security architecture in the Asia-Pacific region, the interface between terrorism and weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), China as a factor in India-US relations, and the fallout of the New Delhi-Washington partnership on South Asia. B.M. Jain is a former Senior Fellow at the Indian Council of Social Sciences Research (ICSSR, New Delhi) in India, and was Visiting Professor in the Departments of Political Science at both Cleveland State University and Binghamton University, USA. Previously he was Professor of Political Science at the University of Rajasthan at Jaipur, India, and Editor-in-Chief of the Indian Journal of Asian Affairs.
    [Show full text]