1 Euclidean Vector Space and Euclidean Affi Ne Space

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Euclidean Vector Space and Euclidean Affi Ne Space Profesora: Eugenia Rosado. E.T.S. Arquitectura. Euclidean Geometry1 1 Euclidean vector space and euclidean a¢ ne space 1.1 Scalar product. Euclidean vector space. Let V be a real vector space. De…nition. A scalar product is a map (denoted by a dot ) V V R ! (~u;~v) ~u ~v 7! satisfying the following axioms: 1. commutativity ~u ~v = ~v ~u 2. distributive ~u (~v + ~w) = ~u ~v + ~u ~w 3. ( ~u) ~v = (~u ~v) 4. ~u ~u 0, for every ~u V 2 5. ~u ~u = 0 if and only if ~u = 0 De…nition. Let V be a real vector space and let be a scalar product. The pair (V; ) is said to be an euclidean vector space. Example. The map de…ned as follows V V R ! (~u;~v) ~u ~v = x1x2 + y1y2 + z1z2 7! where ~u = (x1; y1; z1), ~v = (x2; y2; z2) is a scalar product as it satis…es the …ve properties of a scalar product. This scalar product is called standard (or canonical) scalar product. The pair (V; ) where is the standard scalar product is called the standard euclidean space. 1.1.1 Norm associated to a scalar product. Let (V; ) be a real euclidean vector space. De…nition. A norm associated to the scalar product is a map de…ned as follows V kk R ! ~u ~u = p~u ~u: 7! k k Profesora: Eugenia Rosado, E.T.S. Arquitectura. Euclidean Geometry.2 1.1.2 Unitary and orthogonal vectors. Orthonormal basis. Let (V; ) be a real euclidean vector space. De…nition. A vector ~u V is said to be unitary if ~u = 1. 2 k k Given a vector ~u V , ~u = ~0, we can obtain a unitary vector ~v from ~u just considering the vector 2 6 1 ~v = ~u ~u k k as 1 1 ~v = ~u ~u = ~u ~u = 1: k k k k k k k k De…nition. Two vectors ~u;~v V are said to be orthogonal is if ~u ~v = 0. 2 Theorem. Let ~u;~v; ~w be three nonzero vectors in a 3-dimensional eucliden vector space (V; ). If the vectors ~u;~v; ~w are two by two orthogonal then B = (~u;~v; ~w) is a basis of (V; ). (The proof is left to the reader). De…nition. Let (V; ) be a real euclidean vector space. A basis B of (V; ) is said to be orthonormal if the vectors in B are unitary and two by two orthogonal. Example. Let (V; ) be the standard euclidean space and let ~u = (1; 0; 1), ~v = ( 1; 0; 1), ~w = (0; 3; 0). Let check that B = (~u;~v; ~w) is a basis of (V; ) and let obtain an orthogonal basis of (V; ). The vectors ~u;~v; ~w are two by two orthogonal: ~u ~v = (1; 0; 1) ( 1; 0; 1) = 0; ~u ~w = (1; 0; 1) (0; 3; 0) = 0; ~v ~w = ( 1; 0; 1) (0; 3; 0) = 0; hence B = (~u;~v; ~w) is a basis of V . As ~u = p2, ~v = p2 and ~w = 3, B is not an orthonormal basis. By considering the vectorsk k k k k k 1 1 1 ~u0 = ~u = ; 0; ; ~u p2 p2 k k 1 1 1 ~v0 = ~v = ; 0; ; ~v p2 p2 k k 1 ~w0 = ~w ~w = (0; 1; 0); k k we obtain an orthonormal basis B0 = (~u0;~v0; ~w0). Profesora: Eugenia Rosado, E.T.S. Arquitectura. Euclidean Geometry.3 1.1.3 Angle between two vectors. De…nition. Let ~u;~v be nonzero vectors in an eucliden vector space (V; ). The cosine of the angle given by the two vectors ~u;~v is de…ned as the real number satisfying ~u ~v cos(~u;~v) = ; ~u ~v k k k k d where ~u;~v denotes the angle given by the two vectors ~u;~v. d 1.1.4 Vector product. Let (V; ) be a 3-dimensional euclidean vector space with orthonormal basis B = (~u1; ~u2; ~u3). De…nition. We de…ne the vector product of two vectors ~u = (x1; y1; z1), ~v = (x2; y2; z2), and we denote it ~u ~v, as the vector with components ^ y z x z x y 1 1 ; 1 1 ; 1 1 y2 z2 x2 z2 y2 y2 respect to the basis B. Simbolically ~u ~v can be writen as folows ^ ~u1 ~u2 ~u3 ~u ~v = x1 y1 z1 ^ x2 y2 z2 y1 z1 x1 z1 x1 y1 = ~u1 ~u2 + ~u3: y2 z2 x2 z2 y2 y2 Remark. The norm of the vector product of two vector ~u, ~v satis…es ~u ~v = ~u ~v sin ~u;~v : k ^ k k k k k Properties. The most important propeties of the vectord product are: 1. Anticommutativity ~u ~v = ~v ~u ^ ^ 2. ( ~u) ~v = (~u ~v) ^ ^ 3. ~u (~v + ~w) = ~u ~v + ~u ~w ^ ^ ^ 4. The vector product ~u ~v is orthogonal to ~u and to ~v. ^ 5. The vector product of two vector ~u, ~v is zero if and only if the two vectors are linearly dependet. (The proof is left to the reader). Profesora: Eugenia Rosado, E.T.S. Arquitectura. Euclidean Geometry.4 1.1.5 Mixed product. Let (V; ) be a 3-dimensional euclidean vector space with orthonormal basis B = (~u1; ~u2; ~u3). De…nition. The map V V V R ! (~u;~v; ~w) ~u (~v ~w) ; 7! ^ is called the mixed product. Remark. If ~u = (x1; y1; z1), ~v = (x2; y2; z2) and ~w = (x3; y3; z3) and taking into account that B = (~u1; ~u2; ~u3) is an orthonormal basis, we have y2 z2 x2 z2 x2 y2 ~u (~v ~w) = (x1~u1 + y1~u2 + z1~u3) ~u1 ~u2 + ~u3 ^ y3 z3 x3 z3 y3 y3 y2 z2 x2 z 2 x2 y 2 = x1 y1 + z1 y3 z3 x3 z3 y3 y3 x 1 y1 z1 = x y z : 2 2 2 x3 y3 z3 Remark. Geometrically, the absolute value of the mixed product represents the volume of the parallelepiped whose edges concur in the same vertex are the three vectors. 1.2 Euclidean a¢ ne space De…nition. An a¢ ne space (A; V; ) is said to be euclidean if the associated vector space V is an euclidean vector space. Usually an euclidean a¢ ne space is denoted E. De…nition. In an euclidean a¢ ne space E we de…ne the distance of two ponts as follows: d(P; Q) = !PQ We will cosider orthonormal a¢ ne references; that is, references = O; B = (~u1; ; ~un) such that the basis B is an orthonormal basis. R f g Property. The change of coordinates matrix of two orthonormal references , 0, R R 1 0:::0 b1 M( 0; ) = 0 . 1 R R . A B C B bn C B C t 1 t @ A satis…es A = A (where A denotes the transpose matrix of A). That is, the matrix A is orthogonal. Profesora: Eugenia Rosado, E.T.S. Arquitectura. Euclidean Geometry.5 1.3 Metric problems. Let E be an euclidean a¢ ne space. De…nition. A vector ~v V is said to be orthogonal to a¢ ne subspace L E if ~v is orthogonal to the vector in2L~ . 1.3.1 Normal plane equation. Let A be a point in an a¢ ne plane and let ~v V be orthogonal to . Hence, a point X is in the plane if and only if 2 !AX ~v = 0: A vector ~u satisfaying !AB ~u = 0 for all A; B is said to be a normal vector to the plane. 2 If ~v V be orthogonal to is a unitary vector, then !AX ~v = 0 is called the normal plane equation2 . 1.3.2 Angle between two lines. Let r1 be the line containing a point A and with director vector ~u, and let r2 be the line containing a point B and with director vector ~v. The angle between the lines r1 and r2 is the angle between the vectors ~u and ~v. 1.3.3 Angle between two planes. Let 1 be the plane containing a point A and with normal vector ~u, and let 2 be the plane containing a point B and with normal vector ~v. The angle between the planes 1 and 2 is the angle between the normal vectors ~u and ~v. 1.3.4 Angle between a line and a plane. Let r be the line containing a point A and with director vector ~u, and let be the plane containing a point B and with normal vector ~v. The angle between the line r and the plane is the complementary of the angle between the vectors ~u and ~v; that is, sin = cos( ) = cos(~u;~v): 2 d Profesora: Eugenia Rosado, E.T.S. Arquitectura. Euclidean Geometry.6 1.3.5 Distance between a point and a line. The distance between a point P0 and a line r is the minimum of the distances between P0 and P where P r. Let P r and2 let ~v be a director vector of r, hence 2 \ !P0P ~v = !P0P ~v sin(!P0P ;~v) ^ k k = ~v d( P0; r); k k and, therefore !P0P ~v d(P ; r) = ^ : 0 ~v k k Example. Let compute the distance between the point A = (2; 3; 0) and the line r x 1 y z+2 1 = 1 = 2 . We have P = (1; 0; 2) r and ~v = ( 1; 1; 2) ~r hence 2 2 !AP = ( 1; 3; 2) ~u1 ~u2 ~u3 !AP ~v = 1 3 2 = (8; 4; 2) ^ 1 1 2 ~v = p1 + 1 + 4 = p 6; k k therefore !AP ~v p82 + 42 + 22 p4222 + 2222 + 22 d(A; r) = ^ = = ~v p6 p6 k k 22 (42 + 22 + 1) 2p21 = = : p p6 p6 Profesora: Eugenia Rosado, E.T.S.
Recommended publications
  • Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)
    1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Linear Algebra Terms
    INNER PRODUCT SPACES AND THE GRAM-SCHMIDT PROCESS A. HAVENS 1. The Dot Product and Orthogonality 1.1. Review of the Dot Product. We first recall the notion of the dot product, which gives us a familiar example of an inner product structure on the real vector spaces Rn. This product is connected to the Euclidean geometry of Rn, via lengths and angles measured in Rn. Later, we will introduce inner product spaces in general, and use their structure to define general notions of length and angle on other vector spaces. Definition 1.1. The dot product of real n-vectors in the Euclidean vector space Rn is the scalar product · : Rn × Rn ! R given by the rule n n ! n X X X (u; v) = uiei; viei 7! uivi : i=1 i=1 i n Here BS := (e1;:::; en) is the standard basis of R . With respect to our conventions on basis and matrix multiplication, we may also express the dot product as the matrix-vector product 2 3 v1 6 7 t î ó 6 . 7 u v = u1 : : : un 6 . 7 : 4 5 vn It is a good exercise to verify the following proposition. Proposition 1.1. Let u; v; w 2 Rn be any real n-vectors, and s; t 2 R be any scalars. The Euclidean dot product (u; v) 7! u · v satisfies the following properties. (i:) The dot product is symmetric: u · v = v · u. (ii:) The dot product is bilinear: • (su) · v = s(u · v) = u · (sv), • (u + v) · w = u · w + v · w.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Differential Calculus
    KAMIWAAI – INTERACTIVE 3D SKETCHING WITH JAVA BASED ON Cl(4,1) CONFORMAL MODEL OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE Submitted to (Feb. 28,2003): Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, http://redquimica.pquim.unam.mx/clifford_algebras/ Eckhard M. S. Hitzer Dept. of Mech. Engineering, Fukui Univ. Bunkyo 3-9-, 910-8507 Fukui, Japan. Email: [email protected], homepage: http://sinai.mech.fukui-u.ac.jp/ Abstract. This paper introduces the new interactive Java sketching software KamiWaAi, recently developed at the University of Fukui. Its graphical user interface enables the user without any knowledge of both mathematics or computer science, to do full three dimensional “drawings” on the screen. The resulting constructions can be reshaped interactively by dragging its points over the screen. The programming approach is new. KamiWaAi implements geometric objects like points, lines, circles, spheres, etc. directly as software objects (Java classes) of the same name. These software objects are geometric entities mathematically defined and manipulated in a conformal geometric algebra, combining the five dimensions of origin, three space and infinity. Simple geometric products in this algebra represent geometric unions, intersections, arbitrary rotations and translations, projections, distance, etc. To ease the coordinate free and matrix free implementation of this fundamental geometric product, a new algebraic three level approach is presented. Finally details about the Java classes of the new GeometricAlgebra software package and their associated methods are given. KamiWaAi is available for free internet download. Key Words: Geometric Algebra, Conformal Geometric Algebra, Geometric Calculus Software, GeometricAlgebra Java Package, Interactive 3D Software, Geometric Objects 1. Introduction The name “KamiWaAi” of this new software is the Romanized form of the expression in verse sixteen of chapter four, as found in the Japanese translation of the first Letter of the Apostle John, which is part of the New Testament, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 ANGULAR MOMENTUM and ROTATIONS
    Chapter 5 ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND ROTATIONS In classical mechanics the total angular momentum L~ of an isolated system about any …xed point is conserved. The existence of a conserved vector L~ associated with such a system is itself a consequence of the fact that the associated Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) is invariant under rotations, i.e., if the coordinates and momenta of the entire system are rotated “rigidly” about some point, the energy of the system is unchanged and, more importantly, is the same function of the dynamical variables as it was before the rotation. Such a circumstance would not apply, e.g., to a system lying in an externally imposed gravitational …eld pointing in some speci…c direction. Thus, the invariance of an isolated system under rotations ultimately arises from the fact that, in the absence of external …elds of this sort, space is isotropic; it behaves the same way in all directions. Not surprisingly, therefore, in quantum mechanics the individual Cartesian com- ponents Li of the total angular momentum operator L~ of an isolated system are also constants of the motion. The di¤erent components of L~ are not, however, compatible quantum observables. Indeed, as we will see the operators representing the components of angular momentum along di¤erent directions do not generally commute with one an- other. Thus, the vector operator L~ is not, strictly speaking, an observable, since it does not have a complete basis of eigenstates (which would have to be simultaneous eigenstates of all of its non-commuting components). This lack of commutivity often seems, at …rst encounter, as somewhat of a nuisance but, in fact, it intimately re‡ects the underlying structure of the three dimensional space in which we are immersed, and has its source in the fact that rotations in three dimensions about di¤erent axes do not commute with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity: Some Personal History
    history-st-cuba-slides 8:31 May 27, 2008 1 SCALAR-TENSOR THEORIES OF GRAVITY: SOME PERSONAL HISTORY Cuba meeting in Mexico 2008 Remembering Johnny Wheeler (JAW), 1911-2008 and Bob Dicke, 1916-1997 We all recall Johnny as one of the most prominent and productive leaders of relativ- ity research in the United States starting from the late 1950’s. I recall him as the man in relativity when I entered Princeton as a graduate student in 1957. One of his most recent students on the staff there at that time was Charlie Misner, who taught a really new, interesting, and, to me, exciting type of relativity class based on then “modern mathematical techniques involving topology, bundle theory, differential forms, etc. Cer- tainly Misner had been influenced by Wheeler to pursue these then cutting-edge topics and begin the re-write of relativity texts that ultimately led to the massive Gravitation or simply “Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler. As I recall (from long! ago) Wheeler was the type to encourage and mentor young people to investigate new ideas, especially mathe- matical, to develop and probe new insights into the physical universe. Wheeler himself remained, I believe, more of a “generalist, relying on experts to provide details and rigorous arguments. Certainly some of the world’s leading mathematical work was being done only a brief hallway walk away from Palmer Physical Laboratory to Fine Hall. Perhaps many are unaware that Bob Dicke had been an undergraduate student of Wheeler’s a few years earlier. It was Wheeler himself who apparently got Bob thinking about the foundations of Einstein’s gravitational theory, in particular, the ever present mysteries of inertia.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Electrical Machines and Antennas Via Scalar and Vector Magnetic Potentials; an Approach for Enhancing Undergraduate EM Education
    Integrating Electrical Machines and Antennas via Scalar and Vector Magnetic Potentials; an Approach for Enhancing Undergraduate EM Education Seemein Shayesteh Maryam Rahmani Lauren Christopher Maher Rizkalla Department of Electrical and Department of Electrical and Department of Electrical and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Computer Engineering Computer Engineering Computer Engineering Indiana University Purdue Indiana University Purdue Indiana University Purdue Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis University Indianapolis University Indianapolis University Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—This Innovative Practice Work In Progress paper undergraduate course. In one offering the course was attached presents an approach for enhancing undergraduate with a project using COMSOL software that assisted students Electromagnetic education. with better understanding of the differential EM equations within the course. Keywords— Electromagnetic, antennas, electrical machines, undergraduate, potentials, projects, ECE II. COURSE OUTLINE I. INTRODUCTION A. Typical EM Course within an ECE Curriculum Often times, the subject of using two potential functions in A typical EM undergraduate course requires Physics magnetism, the scalar magnetic potential function, ܸ௠, and the (electricity and magnetism) and Differential equations as pre- vector magnetic potential function, ܣ (with zero current requisite
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Four-Momentum Kinematics As
    L4:1 Basic four-momentum kinematics Rindler: Ch5: sec. 25-30, 32 Last time we intruduced the contravariant 4-vector HUB, (II.6-)II.7, p142-146 +part of I.9-1.10, 154-162 vector The world is inconsistent! and the covariant 4-vector component as implicit sum over We also introduced the scalar product For a 4-vector square we have thus spacelike timelike lightlike Today we will introduce some useful 4-vectors, but rst we introduce the proper time, which is simply the time percieved in an intertial frame (i.e. time by a clock moving with observer) If the observer is at rest, then only the time component changes but all observers agree on ✁S, therefore we have for an observer at constant speed L4:2 For a general world line, corresponding to an accelerating observer, we have Using this it makes sense to de ne the 4-velocity As transforms as a contravariant 4-vector and as a scalar indeed transforms as a contravariant 4-vector, so the notation makes sense! We also introduce the 4-acceleration Let's calculate the 4-velocity: and the 4-velocity square Multiplying the 4-velocity with the mass we get the 4-momentum Note: In Rindler m is called m and Rindler's I will always mean with . which transforms as, i.e. is, a contravariant 4-vector. Remark: in some (old) literature the factor is referred to as the relativistic mass or relativistic inertial mass. L4:3 The spatial components of the 4-momentum is the relativistic 3-momentum or simply relativistic momentum and the 0-component turns out to give the energy: Remark: Taylor expanding for small v we get: rest energy nonrelativistic kinetic energy for v=0 nonrelativistic momentum For the 4-momentum square we have: As you may expect we have conservation of 4-momentum, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory of Scalar Field in De Sitter Space-Time
    ANNALES DE L’I. H. P., SECTION A N. A. CHERNIKOV E. A. TAGIROV Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 9, no 2 (1968), p. 109-141 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1968__9_2_109_0> © Gauthier-Villars, 1968, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam. org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Section A : Vol. IX, n° 2, 1968, 109 Physique théorique. Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time N. A. CHERNIKOV E. A. TAGIROV Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, USSR. ABSTRACT. - The quantum theory of scalar field is constructed in the de Sitter spherical world. The field equation in a Riemannian space- time is chosen in the = 0 owing to its confor- . mal invariance for m = 0. In the de Sitter world the conserved quantities are obtained which correspond to isometric and conformal transformations. The Fock representations with the cyclic vector which is invariant under isometries are shown to form an one-parametric family. They are inequi- valent for different values of the parameter. However, its single value is picked out by the requirement for motion to be quasiclassis for large values of square of space momentum.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalar Wave Transponder
    Konstantin Meyl Scalar wave transponder Field-physical basis for electrically coupled bi- directional far range transponder With the current RFID -Technology the transfer of energy takes place on a chip card by means of longitudinal wave components in close range of the transmitting antenna. Those are scalar waves, which spread towards the electrical or the magnetic field pointer. In the wave equation with reference to the Maxwell field equations, these wave components are set to zero, why only postulated model computations exist, after which the range is limited to the sixth part of the wavelength. A goal of this paper is to create, by consideration of the scalar wave components in the wave equation, the physical conditions for the development of scalar wave transponders which are operable beyond the close range. The energy is transferred with the same carrier wave as the information and not over two separated ways as with RFID systems. Besides the bi-directional signal transmission, the energy transfer in both directions is additionally possible because of the resonant coupling between transmitter and receiver. First far range transponders developed on the basis of the extended field equations are already functional as prototypes. Scalar wave transponder 3 Preface Before the introduction into the topic, the title of the book should be first explained more in detail. A "scalar wave" spreads like every wave directed, but it consists of physical particles or formations, which represent for their part scalar sizes. Therefore the name, which is avoided by some critics or is even disparaged, because of the apparent contradiction in the designation, which makes believe the wave is not directional, which does not apply however.
    [Show full text]
  • The Velocity and Momentum Four-Vectors
    Physics 171 Fall 2015 The velocity and momentum four-vectors 1. The four-velocity vector The velocity four-vector of a particle is defined by: dxµ U µ = =(γc ; γ~v ) , (1) dτ where xµ = (ct ; ~x) is the four-position vector and dτ is the differential proper time. To derive eq. (1), we must express dτ in terms of dt, where t is the time coordinate. Consider the infinitesimal invariant spacetime separation, 2 2 2 µ ν ds = −c dτ = ηµν dx dx , (2) in a convention where ηµν = diag(−1 , 1 , 1 , 1) . In eq. (2), there is an implicit sum over the repeated indices as dictated by the Einstein summation convention. Dividing by −c2 yields 3 1 c2 − v2 v2 dτ 2 = c2dt2 − dxidxi = dt2 = 1 − dt2 = γ−2dt2 , c2 c2 c2 i=1 ! X i i 2 i i where we have employed the three-velocity v = dx /dt and v ≡ i v v . In the last step we have introduced γ ≡ (1 − v2/c2)−1/2. It follows that P dτ = γ−1 dt . (3) Using eq. (3) and the definition of the three-velocity, ~v = d~x/dt, we easily obtain eq. (1). Note that the squared magnitude of the four-velocity vector, 2 µ ν 2 U ≡ ηµνU U = −c (4) is a Lorentz invariant, which is most easily evaluated in the rest frame of the particle where ~v = 0, in which case U µ = c (1 ; ~0). 2. The relativistic law of addition of velocities Let us now consider the following question.
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Linear Algebra
    Basics of Linear Algebra Jos and Sophia Vectors ● Linear Algebra Definition: A list of numbers with a magnitude and a direction. ○ Magnitude: a = [4,3] |a| =sqrt(4^2+3^2)= 5 ○ Direction: angle vector points ● Computer Science Definition: A list of numbers. ○ Example: Heights = [60, 68, 72, 67] Dot Product of Vectors Formula: a · b = |a| × |b| × cos(θ) ● Definition: Multiplication of two vectors which results in a scalar value ● In the diagram: ○ |a| is the magnitude (length) of vector a ○ |b| is the magnitude of vector b ○ Θ is the angle between a and b Matrix ● Definition: ● Matrix elements: ● a)Matrix is an arrangement of numbers into rows and columns. ● b) A matrix is an m × n array of scalars from a given field F. The individual values in the matrix are called entries. ● Matrix dimensions: the number of rows and columns of the matrix, in that order. Multiplication of Matrices ● The multiplication of two matrices ● Result matrix dimensions ○ Notation: (Row, Column) ○ Columns of the 1st matrix must equal the rows of the 2nd matrix ○ Result matrix is equal to the number of (1, 2, 3) • (7, 9, 11) = 1×7 +2×9 + 3×11 rows in 1st matrix and the number of = 58 columns in the 2nd matrix ○ Ex. 3 x 4 ॱ 5 x 3 ■ Dot product does not work ○ Ex. 5 x 3 ॱ 3 x 4 ■ Dot product does work ■ Result: 5 x 4 Dot Product Application ● Application: Ray tracing program ○ Quickly create an image with lower quality ○ “Refinement rendering pass” occurs ■ Removes the jagged edges ○ Dot product used to calculate ■ Intersection between a ray and a sphere ■ Measure the length to the intersection points ● Application: Forward Propagation ○ Input matrix * weighted matrix = prediction matrix http://immersivemath.com/ila/ch03_dotprodu ct/ch03.html#fig_dp_ray_tracer Projections One important use of dot products is in projections.
    [Show full text]