DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes on the Biology of Battus Philenor (Papilionidae) in Centre County, Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notes on the Biology of Battus Philenor (Papilionidae) in Centre County, Pennsylvania VOLUME 33, NUMBER 4 267 above the ground. When sunlight touched resting sites, individuals moved around the trunk to shade. Observing and collecting was facilitated in these moths as they rested on the same side of all trees at a given time. Forewing markings, showing the consid­ erable variation common in many Catocala species, blended well with the grey bark of the oaks. It would be difficult to estimate the number of underwing moths in this aggregation, or to know how extensive the population was. But certainly many hundreds of speci­ mens were congregated within the park that afternoon. It is likely this phenomenon occurred in this area in other years as well, but this was my first observation of such a remarkable event. While C. palaeogama was the predominate species represented, single specimens of C. lacrymosa Guenee and C. amica Hubner were collected. A large series of C. palaeogama was taken, and a number of these, deposited in the collection of Mr. Bryant Mather, Clinton, Mississippi, were subsequently positively identified by Mr. Eric Quinter, American Museum of Natural History. Specimens of the same catch were also deposited in the collections of Dr. Clifford D. Ferris (Laramie, Wyoming), Mr. Patrick J. Conway (Downers Grove, Illinois), Mr. Mogens C. Nielsen (Lansing, Michigan), and the Illinois Natural History Survey (Urbana, Illinois). It is interesting to note that a collecting trip during the following weekend to the same locality yielded no additional specimens of C. palaeogama after the supera­ bundance of the previous week. The area which had been alive with activity at that time was now dead, so far as that species was concerned. However, specimens of other Catocala species were collected during the second visit. IRWIN LEEuw, 1219 Crystal Lake Road, Cary, Illinois 60013. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 33(4), 1979,267-268 NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY OF BATTUS PHILENOR (PAPILIONIDAE) IN CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Centre County occupies parts of two geographic provinces. The northwestern third lies in the Allegheny Plateau Province, while the southeastern two thirds belongs to the Ridge and Valley Province (Westerfeld, 1959, Pa. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 647: 6-17). The configuration of land surface in the latter is due to the folding of the rocks into parallel mountain chains. These sandstone ridges are oriented from southwest to north­ east and average from 550-730 m in elevation. Separated by these ridges are limestone valleys averaging about 310 m above sea level. Battus philenor (L.) is largely confined to the stream trenches of these valleys. One such area is along Spring Creek adjacent to the Benner Springs Fish Hatchery about 8.5 km northeast of State College. A small but rather stable population has existed here since at least 1974. B. philenor is bivoltine with flight periods from 13 May to 16 June and 6 July to 26 August. Fresh adults occasionally observed in September and early October represent a partial third brood. However, these individuals, mostly males, are probably lost to the population since it is doubtful that their progeny would have sufficient time to reach the pupal (overwintering) stage prior to the onset of cold weather. Males are frequently observed visiting mud puddles, or flying rapidly along the creek and woodland trails and in adjacent meadows. Females are more secretive and are best sought along woodland trails or in open woods. Both sexes prefer pink to purplish flowers such as Hesperis matronalis L., Dipsacus sylvestris Huds., and various thistles (Cirsium spp.). Associated butterflies of special note include Asterocampa clyton (Boisduval and LeConte), Calephelis borealis (Grote and Robinson), and Erynnis lu­ cilius (Scudder and Burgess). 268 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY One of the reported foodplants of B. philenor, Asarum canadense L. (Howe, 1975, The Butterflies of North America: 390), is locally abundant on moist, rocky hillsides along Spring Creek. It was assumed that the larvae were utilizing this resource, al­ though none could be located. A similar observation is made by Harris (1972, Butter­ flies of Georgia: 158) for Bibb County where larvae used only cultivated Aristolochia even though Asarum was present. On 2 June 1978, a female was confined with potted A. canadense. She died after 10 days without oviposition. Internal examination re­ vealed that she was mated and had numerous mature ova. We then began a more intensive search for the specific host. On 4 August at about 1700 h, a female B. philenor was observed ovipositing on Aristolochia serpentaria L. This is the only Aristolochia species in the county and is rare and confined to the Ridge and Valley Province (Westerfeld, 1961, Castanea 26: 34). Additional small plants (about 30 cm in height) were subsequently located growing singly or in small groups on the rocky, open-wooded hillsides adjacent to the creek. Numerous ova and first to fourth instar larvae were found on these plants. Most ova were laid on the petioles and/or margins of the upper leaves with up to four individuals per plant. Plants growing in moist, brushy, shaded areas were larger and more luxu­ riant: however, ova and/or larvae were present in significantly lower numbers. A female captured on 8 August and confined with potted A. serpentaria oviposited within hours of confinement. The resulting ova plus 11 field-collected larvae were reared to pupa using potted plants. Enormous quantities of these plants were required to complete larval development and several field trips were needed to collect additional food. On one of these trips several late-instar larvae were observed wandering apparently in search of food. Ehle (1951, Lepid. News 5: 103) noted for Lancaster Co., Pennsylvania that the required food (A. serpentaria) far exceeded the quantity available at the orig­ inal site. The last instar larvae consumed the leaves, seed capsules, and stems to within about 5 cm above ground level. Several first ins tar larvae were transferred to A. ca­ nadense immediately after emergence and all died without eating. In addition, last instar larvae temporarily confined with this species refused to eat. Saunders (1932, Butterflies of the Alleghany State Park: 234) remarked that he was able to get B. phi­ lenor larvae to eat only Aristolochia and not Asarum except for one larva which "ate a little Wild Ginger, but did not seem to like it." Of the 25 larvae reared to pupa, 60% diapaused and were refrigerated. Conclusions which may be drawn from these observations are as follows: The use of Asarum qanadense as a larval food source is to be seriously questioned if not com­ pletely discounted. At the Spring Creek site, the amount, distribution, and availability of the host plant, Aristolochia serpentaria, appears to be a significant factor in regu­ lating population size. Selection pressure toward producing adult females and larvae with maximum search capabilities would be necessary to maintain a stable population in the absence of immigration. Larval parasitism (or predation) was not investigated, however, all of the field collected larvae (third and fourth ins tars) ~ere successfully rearedto pupae. FRANK D. FEE, 308 S. Carl St., State College, Pennsylvania 16801 and RICHARD BOSCOE, 150 Ridge Pike, Apt. 201, Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania 19444. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 33(4), 1979, 268-269 BOOK REVIEW BUTTERFLIES OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, by Robert H . Fisher, 1978. One of the series "Handbooks of the Flora and Fauna of South Australia," issued by the Handbooks Committee for the South Australian Government, 8vo, soft cover, [iii] + 272 pp., 83 text figures, 16 color plates. Price $9.50 Australian (approximately $11.00 U.S.). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aristolochia Serpentaria L
    New England Plant Conservation Program Aristolochia serpentaria L. Virginia Snakeroot Conservation and Research Plan for New England Prepared by: Dorothy J. Allard, Ph.D. Analytical Resources, LLC P.O. Box 279 East Montpelier, VT 05651 For: New England Wild Flower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508/877-7630 e-mail: [email protected] • website: www.newfs.org Approved, Regional Advisory Council, 2002 SUMMARY Aristolochia serpentaria L., commonly known as Virginia Snakeroot, is a perennial herb in the Aristolochiaceae. Several varieties have been described in the past, but they are no longer recognized in most taxonomic manuals. Aristolochia serpentaria occurs in 26 eastern states and is common in the southern and central part of its range, while becoming rare along its northern periphery. It is listed as a Division 2 species in Flora Conservanda (Brumback and Mehrhoff et al. 1996). Connecticut is the only New England state in which it is found, where it occurs at 12 known sites in ten towns. It grows in a variety of upland forest communities, but is more likely to be found in dry, somewhat rich, rocky, deciduous or mixed deciduous-coniferous woods in Connecticut. Farther south, it also has broad environmental requirements, occupying many upland soil and forest types. Population trends for the species in Connecticut are unclear. One new population was discovered in 2001. Monitoring in 2001 of eight extant sites found that two populations had decreased, three had increased, and one had stayed the same. Several known populations are threatened by habitat modification, invasive species, or site fragility. Two extant populations have not been surveyed for several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristolochic Acids Tract Urothelial Cancer Had an Unusually High Incidence of Urinary- Bladder Urothelial Cancer
    Report on Carcinogens, Fourteenth Edition For Table of Contents, see home page: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc Aristolochic Acids tract urothelial cancer had an unusually high incidence of urinary- bladder urothelial cancer. CAS No.: none assigned Additional case reports and clinical investigations of urothelial Known to be human carcinogens cancer in AAN patients outside of Belgium support the conclusion that aristolochic acids are carcinogenic (NTP 2008). The clinical stud- First listed in the Twelfth Report on Carcinogens (2011) ies found significantly increased risks of transitional-cell carcinoma Carcinogenicity of the urinary bladder and upper urinary tract among Chinese renal- transplant or dialysis patients who had consumed Chinese herbs or Aristolochic acids are known to be human carcinogens based on drugs containing aristolochic acids, using non-exposed patients as sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity from studies in humans and the reference population (Li et al. 2005, 2008). supporting data on mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Evidence of car- Molecular studies suggest that exposure to aristolochic acids is cinogenicity from studies in experimental animals supports the find- also a risk factor for Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) and up- ings in humans. per-urinary-tract urothelial cancer associated with BEN (Grollman et al. 2007). BEN is a chronic tubulointerstitial disease of the kidney, Cancer Studies in Humans endemic to Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia, Bulgaria, and Romania, that has The evidence for carcinogenicity in humans is based on (1) findings morphology and clinical features similar to those of AAN. It has been of high rates of urothelial cancer, primarily of the upper urinary tract, suggested that exposure to aristolochic acids results from consump- among individuals with renal disease who had consumed botanical tion of wheat contaminated with seeds of Aristolochia clematitis (Ivic products containing aristolochic acids and (2) mechanistic studies 1970, Hranjec et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Museum Associates Richard S
    New York Flora Association - New York State Museum Associates Richard S. Mitchell, Editor, New York State Museum Correspondence to NYFA, 3140 CEC, Albany, NY 12230 Vol. 13 No. 4 - Sept. 2002 e-mail: [email protected] Join $15 - Dues $10/Yr Skirting Schunnemunk – by Richard Mitchell, N.Y. State Museum Please forgive the high degree enthusiasm that prompted me to devote the lead article to the same old mountain for two issues in a row. But, trust me, this is mostly not about Schunnemunk, but some fascinating botanical areas we visited in the immediate vicinity – alkaline sites such as Round Hill and Moodna Creek. Round Hill - Perhaps the oddest but most productive of our days of exploration was the one spent on Round Hill. Located on the west side of Schunnemunk, this hill is marked by gently ascending slopes that face abrupty on a steep knob of conglomerate rock, apparently high in alkaline pebbles and sand. First visited by David Werrier weeks before, the slope offered little of interest until the ascent increased sharply at the base of the knob; then, we noticed quite a bit of a white boneset in the open-canopy woods – nearly all Eupatorium sessilifolium. The chalky-looking talus was weathering to a fine, grayish-brown soil on which just a few plants of serpentary, Aristolochia serpentaria (a State Arabis drummondii A. Gray DRUMMOND’S ROCK-CRESS A New York endangered species now known Endangered species) lurked. Other indicators of the from Orange County near Schunnemunk Mountain alkaline aspect of the slope were hop hornbeam (Ostrya virginica), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis slippery and circuitous journey around the steepest and sweet pignut (Carya ovalis) occurring in some cliffs below the summit, some of which were sheer, abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Robinson State Park Species Count: 544
    Trip Report for: Don Robinson State Park Species Count: 544 Date: Multiple Visits Jefferson County Agency: MODNR Location: LaBarque Creek Watershed - Vascular Plants Participants: Nels Holmberg, WGNSS, MONPS, Justin Thomas, George Yatskievych This list was compiled by Nels Holmbeg over a period of > 10 years Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha gracilens slender three-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha monococca (A. gracilescens var. monococca) one-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha rhomboidea rhombic copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 1 3 Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry Ranunculaceae 8 5 Adiantum pedatum var. pedatum northern maidenhair fern Pteridaceae Fern/Ally 6 1 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia parviflora swamp agrimony Rosaceae 5 -1 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Agrostis perennans upland bent Poaceae/Aveneae 3 1 * Ailanthus altissima tree-of-heaven Simaroubaceae 0 5 * Ajuga reptans carpet bugle Lamiaceae 0 5 Allium canadense var. undetermined wild garlic Liliaceae 2 3 Allium stellatum wild onion Liliaceae 6 5 * Allium vineale field garlic Liliaceae 0 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia bidentata lanceleaf ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 4 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Amorpha canescens lead plant Fabaceae/Faboideae 8 5 Amphicarpaea bracteata hog peanut Fabaceae/Faboideae 4 0 Andropogon gerardii var.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited By
    New York Natural Heritage Program Rare Plant Status List May 2004 Edited by: Stephen M. Young and Troy W. Weldy This list is also published at the website: www.nynhp.org For more information, suggestions or comments about this list, please contact: Stephen M. Young, Program Botanist New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 518-402-8951 Fax 518-402-8925 E-mail: [email protected] To report sightings of rare species, contact our office or fill out and mail us the Natural Heritage reporting form provided at the end of this publication. The New York Natural Heritage Program is a partnership with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and by The Nature Conservancy. Major support comes from the NYS Biodiversity Research Institute, the Environmental Protection Fund, and Return a Gift to Wildlife. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... Page ii Why is the list published? What does the list contain? How is the information compiled? How does the list change? Why are plants rare? Why protect rare plants? Explanation of categories.................................................................................................................... Page iv Explanation of Heritage ranks and codes............................................................................................ Page iv Global rank State rank Taxon rank Double ranks Explanation of plant
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plant Species Occurring at Kingsland Prairie Conservation Area - Updated 23 September 2017 - 447 Taxa
    List of plant species occurring at Kingsland Prairie Conservation Area - Updated 23 September 2017 - 447 taxa. Scientific name Common name Strata Frequency Habitat Source PTERIDOPHYTES Asplenicaceae Asplenium platyneuron ebony spleenwort herb 2 D 3 Dennstaedtiaceae Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern herb 3 D 6 Dryopteridaceae Polystichum acrostichoides Christmas fern herb 2 E 3 Onocleaceae Onoclea sensibilis sensitive fern herb 2 E 12 Ophioglossaceae Botrychium virginianum rattlesnake fern herb 1 D 14 Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern herb 1 C 9 Osmunda regalis var. spectabilis American royal fern herb 1 D 7 Polypodiaceae Pleopeltis polypodioides var. michauxiana resurrection fern herb 2 C, D 3 Thelypteridaceae Phegopteris hexagonoptera southern beech fern herb 2 E 13 Woodsiaceae Athyrium filix-femina var. asplenioides southern lady fern herb 2 E 12 GYMNOSPERMS Cupressaceae Juniperus virginiana eastern red cedar tree, sap, shrub 1 B 3 Pinaceae Pinus echinata shortleaf pine tree, sap 3 B, C 2 Pinus taeda loblolly pine tree, sap 5 B, C, D, F 1 ANGIOSPERMS – MAGNOLIOPSIDA (Dicots) Acanthaceae Justicia ovata var. lanceolata lance-leaf water-willow herb F Ruellia humilis wild petunia herb 3 A 19 Ruellia strepens smooth wild petunia herb 3 D, E 7 Adoxaceae Sambucus canadensis common elderberry shrub 3 C, F 4 Viburnum nudum possum haw tree, shrub 2 D, E 37 Altingaceae Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum tree, sap 4 D,E 3 Anacardiaceae Rhus copallinum winged sumac shrub 2 C 2 Toxicodendron radicans eastern poison ivy woody vine, herb 4 C,
    [Show full text]
  • C3 Primitive Angiosperms
    Magnoliids & other Primitive Angiosperms Revised 5th of May 2015 Angiosperm, pl angiosperms; Angiospermae n (Greek anggeion (angeion), vessel, small container, & Greek σπέρµα, sperma, seed) A major division of the plant kingdom, commonly called flowering plants as their reproductive organs are in flowers, having seeds which develop in a closed ovary made of carpels, a very reduced gametophyte, & endosperm develop from a triple fusion nucleus; flowering plant producing seeds enclosed in a structure derived from the ovary; flowering plant, plants with ovules enclosed in ovary. A division of the seed plants (spermatophytes) that bear ovules & seeds in closed megaspores (carpels) in contrast to gymnosperms, which have exposed ovules & seeds, born “naked” on the megasporophylls. Angiosperms are distinguished by a unique process of sexual reproduction called “double fertilization”. According to the number of leaves (cotyledons) present in the embryo, two major groups are distinguished, the Monocotyledons & the Dicotyledons. Angiosperms are commonly referred to as “flowering plants: even though the reproductive organs of some gymnosperms are also borne in structures that fulfill the definition of a flower. Cf gymnosperm. Angiosperms have traditionally been split into monocotyledons & dicotyledons, or plants with one or two seed leaves respectively. One group of plants that have two seeds leaves was problematic, as it also had primitive flowers & some traits in common with monocots. This group is the Magnoliids, or primitive angiosperms. The remainder of the dicots are called Eudicots, the prefix eu-, from Greek ἐὐς, eus, good, meaning the good dicots. Magnoliids (Eumagnoliids?) About 8,500 (5,000-9,000) spp in 20 angiosperm families, of large trees, shrubs, vines, lianas, & herbs that are neither eudicotyledons nor monocotyledons, distributed in tropical & temperate areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidgo Rigida Var Rigida (Stiff Flat-Topped Goldenrod)
    Solidgo rigida var. rigida L. Stiff flat-topped goldenrod Asteraceae CC Daniel McClosky Wikimedia Commons Solidago rigida var. rigida Rare Plant Profile New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Parks and Forestry New Jersey Forest Service Office of Natural Lands Management New Jersey Natural Heritage Program 501 East State Street P.O. Box 420 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 Prepared by: Lee Minicuci [email protected] January 8, 2020 This report should be cited as follows: Minicuci, Lee. 2020. Solidago rigida var. rigida Rare Plant Profile. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Parks and Forestry, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Trenton, NJ. 8 pp. Solidago rigida var. rigida Plant Profile, Page 2 of 8 Life History Solidago rigida var. rigida, known by the common names stiff goldenrod or stiff flat-topped goldenrod, is a showy perennial in the aster family, Asteraceae. S. rigida is divided into 3 varieties or subspecies (depending on the source). All S. rigida populations found in the northeast belong to the var. rigida designation, but var. rigida and humilis populations begin to overlap in the Midwest where the species is much more common (Brown, 2002). S. rigida, in general, is uncommon in the Eastern United States (Kartesz, 2015). Furthmore, S. rigida appears most often in scientific literature as a member of species lists and is rarely differentiated down to the level of variety. As such, it is difficult to draw conclusions concerning the biology of S. rigida var. rigida (Brown, 2002). S. rigida var.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant Selection by Battus Philenor Butterflies: Evidence for Individual Differences in Foraging Behaviour
    Anim. Behav., 1983, 31, 341-347 HOST PLANT SELECTION BY BATTUS PHILENOR BUTTERFLIES: EVIDENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN FORAGING BEHAVIOUR BY MARK D. RAUSHER & DANIEL R. PAPAJ Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706 Abstract. A previous study reported that individual females of the pipevine swallowtail butterfly, Battus philenor, exhibit different search modes when searching for host plants on which to oviposit. However, an alternative explanation for the results of that study exists: apparent differences in searching behaviour may simply represent differences in the composition of the vegetation over which females fly. The results from the present study rule out this alternative explanation and indicate that apparent differences in search mode reflect underlying differences among females in response to leaf shape. Introduction Consequently, the frequency distribution of the A basic tenet of behavioural ecology is that proportion of broad-leaved plants among all animals alter their searching behaviour when non-hosts on which females alight is bimodal. either the relative abundances or qualities of food Rausher (1978) demonstrated that the host plant items change (MacArthur & Pianka 1966; species more often discovered by a female is Pulliam 1974; Charnov 1976; Estabrook & correlated with the search mode exhibited by that Dunham 1976; Hughes 1979). While such altera- female: broad-leaf searchers alight primarily on tion in response to changes in abundance have the broad-leaved A. reticulata, while narrow-leaf been well documented, both in the laboratory searchers alight primarily on the narrow-leaved (Murdoeh 1969a, b; Manly et al. 1972; Werner A. serpentaria. Rausher (1978, 1980) also showed & Hall 1974; Murdoch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Njplantlist.Pdf
    List of Endangered Plant Species and Plant Species of Concern June 2016 Scientific Name Common Name G Rank S Rank Federal Status State Status Other Status Abies balsamea Balsam Fir G5 S1 E LP, HL Acorus americanus American Sweetflag G5 S1? HL Actaea rubra var. rubra Red Baneberry G5T5 S2 HL Adlumia fungosa Climbing Fumitory G4 S2 HL Aeschynomene virginica Sensitive Joint-vetch G2 S1 LT E LP, HL Agalinis auriculata Ear-leaf False Foxglove G3 SX HL Agalinis fasciculata Pine Barren Foxglove G5 S3 HL Agalinis paupercula var. paupercula Small-flower False Foxglove G5T5 S2 HL Agastache nepetoides Yellow Giant-hyssop G5 S2 HL Agastache scrophulariifolia Purple Giant-hyssop G4 S2 HL Agrimonia microcarpa Small-fruit Grooveburr G5 S2 HL Agrostis geminata Ticklegrass G5 S1? HL Alisma triviale Large Water-plantain G5 S1 E LP, HL Alopecurus aequalis var. aequalis Short-awn Meadow-foxtail G5T5 S2 HL Alopecurus carolinianus Tufted Meadow-foxtail G5 S3 HL Amaranthus pumilus Seabeach Amaranth G2 S1 LT E LP, HL Amelanchier humilis Low Service-berry G5 S1S2 HL Amelanchier nantucketensis Nantucket Service-berry G3Q S1 HL Amelanchier sanguinea var. sanguinea Round-leaf Service-berry G5T5 S1.1 E LP, HL Amelanchier stolonifera Running Service-berry G5 S3 HL Amianthium muscitoxicum Fly Poison G4G5 S2 HL Ammannia latifolia Koehn's Toothcup G5 S1 E LP, HL Andromeda polifolia var. glaucophylla Bog Rosemary G5T5 S1 E LP, HL Andropogon glomeratus var. hirsutior Hairy Beardgrass G5T5 SH.1 HL Andropogon gyrans Elliott's Beardgrass G5 S2 HL Andropogon ternarius var. ternarius Silvery Beardgrass G5T5? S2 HL Anemone canadensis Canada Anemone G5 SX HL Anemone cylindrica Long-head Anemone G5 S1 E LP, HL Anemone virginiana var.
    [Show full text]
  • Polydamas Swallowtail, Gold Rim, Tailless Swallowtail, Battus Polydamas Lucayus (Rothschild & Jordan) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionidae: Troidini)1 Donald W
    EENY-062 Polydamas Swallowtail, Gold Rim, Tailless Swallowtail, Battus polydamas lucayus (Rothschild & Jordan) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionidae: Troidini)1 Donald W. Hall2 Introduction The name Battus is from Battus I, founder of the ancient Greek colony Cyrenaica and its capital, Cyrene, in Africa. The Polydamas swallowtail is one of only two US swal- The specific epithet polydamas is from Polydamas, a charac- lowtails of the genus Battus. It is our only US swallowtail ter from Greek mythology (Opler and Krizek 1984). without tails (Figure 1). Larvae of the Polydamas swallowtail and those of the other swallowtails belonging to the tribe Troidini feed exclusively on plants in the genus Aristolochia and are commonly referred to as the Aristolochia swallowtails. Distribution In the United States, Battus polydamas lucayus occurs as a regular resident in peninsular Florida and the Florida Keys, and occasional strays wander to other Gulf states and as far north as Missouri and Kentucky (Scott 1986). Subspe- cies polydamas occurs in southern Texas (Figure 2) (dos Figure 1. Polydamas swallowtail (Battus polydamas lucayus [Rothschild Passos 1940). & Jordan]). Credits: Donald W. Hall, UF/IFAS Nomenclature The Polydamas swallowtail was originally described and named Papilio polydamas by Linnaeus but was later transferred to the genus Battus (Scopoli 1777) and selected as type species of the genus by Lindsey (1925). 1. This document is EENY-062, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 1998. Revised July 2010, August 2011, October 2015, August 2016, March 2017 and March 2020. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
    [Show full text]