Revolt of 1857 : the First War of Independence
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
International Journal of Engineering, Management, Humanities and Social Sciences Paradigms (IJEMHS) (Volume 20, Issue 01) Publishing Month: April 2016 An Indexed and Referred Journal with Impact Factor: 2.75 ISSN: 2347-601X www.ijemhs.com Revolt of 1857: The First War of Independence? Dr. Parduman Singh Assistant Professor of History Govt. College for Women, Rohtak, Hr (India) Publishing Date: April 22, 2016 Abstract to induction of Sikhs into the Bengal regiment The dictionary meaning of Uprising is “an act of that created a sense of fear among the soldiers resistance or rebellion or a revolt." Most scholars as a position in the army had become a status have used Mutiny and insurrection interchangeably. symbol for the soldiers which they did not Whether the revolt of 1857 was just another revolt want to lose at any cost.1 “Cantonment after in the long series of revolts against British authority cantonment rebelled. When the soldiers or was it rightly called by some as a war of independence? Before we discuss that let us first refused to acknowledge British authority, the examine the causes that led to this revolt. Reasons way was left open for disaffected princes and for the mutiny are still debatable in academic circles aristocrats, and for village and town people and politico-history discussions. However, it was with grievances, to revolt alongside the not the first revolt against the established authority soldiers.”2Apparently, religion seems to be of the British, yet the impact it left on the masses playing the pivot role in flaring up the revolt. makes it a topic of great deliberation. But there were many other reasons of Keywords: Revolt of 1857, Independence, discontent simmering among the masses. „The British. revolt of 1857 was much more than a mere product of sepoy discontent. The civil rebellion of the pre-mutiny and the mutiny periods were Introduction linked because these were "primarily anti- British, anti-colonial movements running A careful study of the programs and objectives through feudal channels.”3 of the revolt reveals its nature and character. It was in reality a product of the The revolt of 1857 is a controversial subject in character and policies of colonial rule, of the the historical studies. The programs and accumulated grievances of the people against objectives of the revolt reveal that it was an the Company's administration and of their attempt to overthrow British rule and attain dislike for the foreign regime.‟4 Few of those freedom, but it did not conceive regarding who provided leadership to this revolt at local making of a nation. The end of British rule was and regional level were: Mangal Pandey, a not linked with nation building process neither sepoy of the 34th Native Infantry fired the did it contain any futuristic progressive vision. bullet that marked the beginning of the great The initial phase of revolt started as a uprising of 1857; Rani Laxmibai of Jhansi sepoy mutiny with only a handful of sepoys of boldly opposed the expansionist policies of Bengal regiment standing up against the British concerning Indian states. The British British raj. The spark that ignited the fear of did not allow her adopted son to succeed her the sepoys was the rumour concerning the use late husband, Raja Ganagadhar Rao, instead of pig and cow fat as a lubricant in the newly they annexed the kingdom. She actively introduced Enfield rifle. According to participated in the revolt; Kunwar Singh was Professor Peter Marshall, the failure of the yet another important leader from Bihar who soldiers of Bengal regiment to imbibe the played an important role in the Revolt of changes and on the other hand the availability 1857;Abdul Muzaffar Muhammad Siraj-ud-din of soldiers from Nepal and Punjab who were Bahadur Shah, the last Mughal Emperor was ready to serve the British interests overseas led IJEMHS www.ijemhs.com 9 International Journal of Engineering, Management, Humanities and Social Sciences Paradigms (IJEMHS) (Volume 20, Issue 01) Publishing Month: April 2016 An Indexed and Referred Journal with Impact Factor: 2.75 ISSN: 2347-601X www.ijemhs.com proclaimed the Emperor of Hindustan shared a common purpose or objective? The following outbreak of revolt in Meerut in answer is No. The rebellion on the part of few 1857; Nana Saheb, the adopted son of Peshwa cannot be called as a first war of independence. Baji Rao II assumed the leadership of troops at According to Dr R C Majumdar, Kanpur and played a critical role in war against “though there was no love lost between the British; Ramchandra Pandurang Tope, a close British Government in India and the various friend of Nana Saheb led the campaign against local chiefs, the native numbers were almost the British in Bundelkhand following capture invariably passive onlookers and in many of Kanpur by the British forces when his friend cases, openly against the movement. Those was deprived of his father‟s pension; The natives who ultimately joined the revolt were Begum of Awadh, Hazrat Mahal was the wife forced by the actions of private Englishmen of of Nawab Wajid Ali Shah of Lucknow, who the Government, and often by the threats of was exiled to Calcutta by the Company, rose in mutineering sepoys.”11He shows how even revolt at Lucknow with the support of Nana then, jealousy and mutual suspicion among Saheb and others; Nahar Singh, a staunch rival chiefs, feudal interests and communal advocate of hindu-muslim unity was the ruler feelings hampered a union of the 'rebel' of Ballabgarh who played an important role in forces.12 “The character of the sepoy risings the revolt.5 and the disturbance among the civil population There were many historians and were largely excited by religious sentiments, scholars who called this revolt the first war of fanned by miscreants and goondas.”13V.D. independence. The most prominent among Savarkar called it “a planned and organised them is Karl Marx who without any hesitation political and military rising aimed at construed the struggle of Indians during 1857 destroying the British power in India.”14 as the first Indian war of independence.6 To S.B. Chaudhuri, the revolt of 1857 Likewise S.B. Chaudhury, an eminent was “a curious coming together of old feudal historian of modern history has conceptualised instincts and anti-alien patriotism. The latter the revolt as „the first combined attempt of was not yet of the pure advanced political type, many classes of people to challenge a foreign as the leaven of feudal discontent was still power. This is a real, if remote, approach to the strong. Yet the yearning for freedom, which freedom movement of India of a later age.‟7 was latent in these instincts stood out as the J.L. Nehru in his work „The outward emblem of a national outburst against Discovery of India‟ writing about the Great foreign rule."15When he raised the question Revolt of 1857 wrote, "It was much more than that "Who knows that the inception of the a military mutiny and it spread rapidly and nationalist movement was not contained in the assumed the character of a popular rebellion rising of 1857 after the fashion of the oak in and a war of Indian independence."8But at the the acorn?"16 he probably meant that the revolt same time calling it “a feudal outburst” if not a war of independence at the least contradicts his own statement of calling the provided a base for national movements later revolt of 1857 a war of independence. While on. speaking about the role of feudal chiefs in the Dr Sen, on the other hand, accepts revolt Nehru spoke of “the lack of unity among that the rising of 1857 assumed a national the feudal chiefs and their lack of any character at least at certain places. He rightly constructive ideal or community of interest points out that diverse factors operated in the which is why he said that they had already growth of this feeling of national unity, such as played their role in history and there was no feudal loyalty, religious feeling etc. Hut in place for them in the future".9 many cases, this national movement assumed a Savarkar asserts that “the Revolution very low character, disfigured by communal of 1857 was a test to see how far India had riots, unnecessary cruelties and excesses. He come towards unity, independence and popular concluded that "nowhere did the sepoy's power.”10 How did the question of conduct conform to a common pattern.” The independence come up when there were no native chiefs were led by motives of personal organised efforts by all the sections of the gain not by the nationalistic and democratic society? Did all those who stood up in revolt ideals of 19th century Liberal Europe and the IJEMHS www.ijemhs.com 10 International Journal of Engineering, Management, Humanities and Social Sciences Paradigms (IJEMHS) (Volume 20, Issue 01) Publishing Month: April 2016 An Indexed and Referred Journal with Impact Factor: 2.75 ISSN: 2347-601X www.ijemhs.com sepoys and their peasant associates often War of Independence‟. Likes of Kunwar Singh betrayed a medieval spirit in their demands on fought for the local interest where few like the British Government.17 Both Sen and Rani Lakshmibai had a regional interest. Thus, Chaudhari agreed that the revolt was not pre- the inter-connectedness among the leaders of planned or concerted. the revolt seems to be missing. Though anti- British sentiments provided a common ground of threat, misery, extermination, etc., yet there Conclusion were few sections of the society that stayed away from the revolt.