DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Writings of Robert K. Merton in the Sociology of Science Books (listed in order of publication) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. In Osiris: Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science. Bruges, Belgium: Saint Catherine Press, Ltd., 1938. With new preface. New York: Howard Fertig, Inc., 1970; paperback edition, New York: Harper & Row, 1970. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press, 1949. Revised edition, 1957. Enlarged edition, 1968. The Student-Physician: Introductory Studies in the Sociology of Medical Educa­ tion. [Coedited with G. G. Reader and P. L. Kendall] Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957. On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. New York: The Free Press, 1965; paperback edition, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1967. On Theoretical Sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1967. Papers (listed in order of publication) Papers marked with an * are included in this volume. “The Course of Arabian Intellectual Development, 700-1300 A.D.” [With P. A. Sorokin] Isis 22 (February 1935): 516—24. “Fluctuations in the Rate of Industrial Invention.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 49 (May 1935): 454—70. ^“Science and Military Technique.” Scientific Monthly 41 (December 1935): 542-45. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1 (1936): 894—904. “Puritanism, Pietism, and Science.” Sociological Review 28 (January 1936): 1-30. “Civilization and Culture.” Sociology and Social Research 21 (November-De- cember 1936): 103-13. 562 Bibliography “Some Economic Factors in Seventeenth Century English Science.” Scientia: Revista di Scienza 62 (1937): 142-52. “Science, Population and Society.” The Scientific Monthly 44 (February 1937): 165-71. “Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis.” [With Pitirim A. Sorokin] The American Journal of Sociology 42 (March 1937): 615-29. “Sociological Aspects of Invention, Discovery and Scientific Theories.” [With P. A. Sorokin] In P. A. Sorokin, Social and Cultural Dynamics. New York: American Book Company, 1937, “The Sociology of Knowledge.” Isis, 27 (November 1937): 493-503. “Social Structure and Anomie.” American Sociological Review 3 (1938): 672-82. *“Science and the Social Order.” Philosophy of Science 5 (1938): 321-37. “Science and the Economy of Seventeenth Century England.” Science and So­ ciety 3 (Winter 1939): 3-27. “Karl Mannheim and the Sociology of Knowledge.” The Journal of Liberal Religion 2 (Winter 1941): 125-47. *“Znaniecki’s The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge." American Sociologi­ cal Review 6 (February 1941): 111-15. *“Science and Technology in a Democratic Order.” Journal of Legal and Politi­ cal Science 1 (October 1942): 115-26. “Role of the Intellectual in Public Bureaucracy.” Social Forces 23 (May 1945): 405-15. *“Sociology of Knowledge.” In Twentieth Century Sociology, edited by Georges Gurvitch and Wilbert E. Moore. New York: Philosophical Library, 1945. “Mass Persuasion: A Technical Problem and a Moral Dilemma.” Chapter 7 in Robert K. Merton, Marjorie Fiske, and Alberta Curtis, Mass Persuasion. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1946; Westport: Greenwood Press, 1971. “The Machine, the Worker, and the Engineer.” Science 105 (24 January 1947): 79-84. “Selected Problems of Field Work in the Planned Community.” American Sociological Review 12 (June 1947): 304-12. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review, Summer 1948, 193-210. *“The Role of Applied Social Science in the Formation of Policy.” Philosophy of Science 16 (July 1949): 161-81. “Election of Polling Forecasts and Public Images of Social Science.” [with Paul K. Hatt] The Public Opinion Quarterly 13 (Summer 1949): 185—222. “Comparison of Wissenssoziologie and Mass Communications Research.” In Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. 1949; enlarged edi­ tion, New York: The Free Press, 1968. “Introduction: Sociology of Science.” In Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. 1949; New York: The Free Press, 1968. “Social Scientists and Research Policy.” [With Daniel Lerner] In The Policy Sciences, edited by Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951. “The Research Budget.” In Research Methods in Social Relations, edited by Marie Jahoda, Morton Deutsch and Stuart W. Cook. New York: Dryden Press, 1951. Pp. 342-51. * “Foreword” to Science and the Social Order, by Bernard Barber. New York: The Free Press, 1952. Bibliography 563 “Brief Bibliography for the Sociology of Science.” [With Bernard Barber] In American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Proceedings 80 (May 1952): 140- 54. “Foreword” to Character and Social Structure, by Hans Gerth and C. W. Mills. New York: Harcourt Brace & World, 1953. “The Knowledge of Man.” In The Unity of Knowledge, edited by Lewis Leary. New York: Doubleday, 1955. “Studies in the Sociology of Medical Education” [With Samuel Bloom and Natalie Rogoff] Journal of Medical Education 31 (August 1956): 552-65. * “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science,” American Sociological Review 22 (December 1957): 635-59. “Some Preliminaries to a Sociology of Medical Education.” In The Student- Physician, edited by R. K. Merton, G. G. Reader and P. Kendall. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957. “Bibliographical Postscript to ‘Puritanism, Pietism and Science’.” In Robert K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. 1957; New York: The Free Press, 1968. “Procedures for the Sociological Study of the Value Climates of Medical Schools.” [with Richard Christie] In The Ecology of the Medical Student, edited by H. H. Gee and R. J. Glaser. Evanston, 111.: Association of Ameri­ can Medical Colleges, 1958. “Medical Education as a Social Process.” [With P. L. Kendall] In Patients, Physicians and Illness, edited by E. G. Jaco. Glencoe: Free Press, 1958. “The Scholar and the Craftsman.” In Critical Problems in the History of Science, edited by Marshall Clagett. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1959. “Notes on Problem-Finding in Sociology.” In Sociology Today, edited by R. K. Merton, L. Broom and L. S. Cottrell. New York: Basic Books, 1959. *“ ‘Recognition’ and ‘Excellence’: Instructive Ambiguities.” In Recognition of Excellence, edited by A. Yarmolinsky. New York: Free Press, 1960. “The Mosaic of the Behavioral Sciences.” In The Behavioral Sciences Today, edited by Bernard Berelson. New York: Basic Books, 1960. * “Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.” In American Philosophical Society. Proceedings 105 (13 Octo­ ber 1961): 470-86. *“Social Conflict over Styles of Sociological Work.” In Fourth World Congress of Sociology. Transactions. Louvain, Belgium: International Sociological Association, 1961. 3:21-36. “Notes on Sociology in the U.S.S.R.” [With Henry Riecken] Current Problems in Social-Behavioral Research. Symposia Studies Series No. 10. Washington, D.C.: The National Institute of Social and Behavioral Science, 1962. Pp. 7-14. ^“Resistance to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science.” European Journal of Sociology 4 (1963): 237-82. *“The Ambivalence of Scientists.” Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital. 112 (1963): 77-97. * “Sorokin’s Formulations in the Sociology of Science.” [With Bernard Barber] In P. A. Sorokin in Review, edited by P. J. Allen. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1963. “Basic Research and Potentials of Relevance.” American Behavioral Scientist 6 (May 1963): 86-90. 564 Bibliography “Practical Problems and the Uses of Social Science.” [With Edward C. Dev- ereux, Jr.] Trans-action 1 (1964): 18-21. “Foreword” to The Technological Society, by Jacques Ellul. New York: A. Knopf, 1964. “The Environment of the Innovating Organization.” In The Creative Organiza­ tion, edited by Gary Steiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965. “On the History and Systematics of Sociological Theory” and “On Sociological Theories of the Middle Range.” In Robert K. Merton, On Theoretical Sociol­ ogy. New York: The Free Press, 1967. *“The Matthew Effect in Science: the Reward and Communication Systems of Science.” Science 199 (5 January 1968): 55-63. “Observations on the Sociology of Science.” Japan-American Forum 14 (April 1968): 18-28. “Seminars Without Constraint.” The Columbia University Forum 11 (Winter 1968): 38-39. * “Behavior Patterns of Scientists.” Copublished in American Scientist 57 (Spring 1969): 1-23, and American Scholar 38 (Spring 1969): 197-225. “Insiders and Outsiders: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge.” 1st ed. in Conspectus of Indian Society, edited by R. N. Saxena. Agra, India: Satish Book Enterprise, 1971: 2d ed. in Essays on Modernization of Under­ developed Societies. Bombay, India: Thacker & Co., Ltd., 1971. * “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” 3d ed. American Journal of Sociology 77 (July 1972): 9-47. “The Precarious Foundations of Detachment in Sociology.” In The Phenomenon of Sociology, edited by Edward A. Tiryakian. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts, 1971. *“The Competitive Pressures (1): The Race for Priority.” [With Richard Lewis] Impact of Science on Society 21 (1971); 151-61. *“Pattems of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System.” [With Harriet Zuckerman] Minerva 9 (January 1971): 66-100. *“Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science.” [With Harriet Zuckerman] In Aging and Society. Vol. 3, A Sociology of Age Stratification, edited by Matilda W. Riley, Marilyn Johnson, and Anne Foner. New York:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Email Is Down!
    Today it is hard to imagine daily communication with out email file:///Q:/TechSvcs/MOspace/MOspace%20content/School%20of%20Jo... The E-mail is Down! Using a 1940s Method to Analyze a 21 st Century Problem by Clyde H. Bentley Associate Professor Missouri School of Journalism University of Missouri and Brooke Fisher Master’s Student Missouri School of Journalism University of Missouri 181D Gannett Hall Columbia, MO 65211-1200 (573) 884-9699 [email protected] \ Presented to the Communications Technology and Policy Division AEJMC 2002 Annual Convention Miami Beach, Florida Aug. 7-10, 2000 1 of 19 2/19/2009 1:31 PM Today it is hard to imagine daily communication with out email file:///Q:/TechSvcs/MOspace/MOspace%20content/School%20of%20Jo... The E-mail is Down! Using a 1940s method to analyze a 21 st century problem Abstract When the electronic mail system at a university crashed, researchers turned to a methodology developed more than 50 years earlier to examine its impact. Using a modified version of Bernard Berelson “missing the newspaper” survey questionnaire, student researchers collected qualitative comments from 85 faculty and staff members. Like the original, the study found extensive anxiety over the loss of the information source, plus a high degree of habituation and dependence on the new medium. 2 of 19 2/19/2009 1:31 PM Today it is hard to imagine daily communication with out email file:///Q:/TechSvcs/MOspace/MOspace%20content/School%20of%20Jo... The E-mail is Down! Using a 1940s Method to Analyze a 21 st Century Problem It seldom puts lives at risk and almost always is accompanied by viable alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteen Pages That Shook the Field: Personal Influence, Edward Shils, and the Remembered History of Media Research
    Personal Influence’s fifteen-page account of the development of mass communication research has had more influence on the field’s historical self-understand- ing than anything published before or since. According to Elihu Katz and Paul Lazarsfeld’s well-written, two- stage narrative, a loose and undisciplined body of pre- war thought had concluded naively that media are powerful—a myth punctured by the rigorous studies of Lazarsfeld and others, which showed time and again that media impact is in fact limited. This “powerful-to- limited-effects” storyline remains textbook boilerplate Fifteen Pages and literature review dogma fifty years later. This article traces the emergence of the Personal Influence synop- That Shook the sis, with special attention to (1) Lazarsfeld’s audience- dependent framing of key media research findings and (2) the surprisingly prominent role of Edward Shils in Field: Personal supplying key elements of the narrative. Influence, Keywords: Paul Lazarsfeld; Edward Shils; Elihu Katz; media research; history of social Edward Shils, science; disciplinary memory and the The bullet model or hypodermic model posits Remembered powerful, direct effects of the mass media. Survey studies of social influence conducted in History of Mass the late 1940s presented a very different model from that of a hypodermic needle in which a Communication multistep flow of media effects was evident. That is, most people receive much of their Research information and are influenced by media secondhand, through the personal influence of opinion leaders (Katz and Lazarsfeld 1955). —Joseph Straubhaar and Robert LaRose (2006, 403) By JEFFERSON POOLEY Jefferson Pooley is assistant professor of media and communication at Muhlenberg College.
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL LAZARSFELD—THE FOUNDER of MODERN EMPIRICAL SOCIOLOGY: a RESEARCH BIOGRAPHY Hynek Jerábek
    International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol. No. –/ $. PAUL LAZARSFELD—THE FOUNDER OF MODERN EMPIRICAL SOCIOLOGY: A RESEARCH BIOGRAPHY Hynek Jerˇa´bek ABSTRACT Paul Lazarsfeld contributed to unemployment research, public opinion and market research, mass media and communications research, political sociology, the sociology of sociology, the history of empirical social research, and applied sociology. His methodological innovations—reason analysis, program analyzer, panel analysis, survey analysis, elaboration formula, latent structure analysis, mathematical sociology (especially the algebra of dichotomous systems), contextual analysis—are of special importance. This study responds to the critiques of Lazarsfeld’s ‘administrative research’ by Theodor W. Adorno, of ‘abstract empiricism’ by Charles W. Mills, and of the ‘Columbia Sociology Machine’ by Terry N. Clark. The paper discusses the merits of the team-oriented style of work presented in Lazarsfeld’s ‘workshop,’ his teaching by engaging in professional activities in social research and methodology, and his consecutive foundation of four research institutes, Vienna’s Wirtschaftspsychologische Forschungsstelle, the Newark Uni- versity Research Center, the Princeton Office of Radio Research, and the Bureau of Applied Social Research at Columbia University in New York. By his manyfold activities, Paul Lazarsfeld decisively promoted the institutionalization of empirical social research. All these merits make him the founder of modern empirical sociology. One hundred years have passed since the birth of the founder of modern empirical sociology, Paul Lazarsfeld. Without him, sociology today would not know terms and concepts such as panel study, opinion leader, latent structure analysis, program analyzer, elaboration formula, reason analysis, and many others. Lazarsfeld’s influence on empirical sociological research, market and public opinion research, and communication research has been much stronger than most of us realize.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnic Factor in the Future of Inequality. INSTITUTION Center for Migration Studies, Inc
    DOCUMENTRESUME ED 141 234 so 01Q 109 AUTHOR Tomasi,, Lydio F. TITLE The Ethnic Factor in the Future of Inequality. INSTITUTION Center for Migration Studies, Inc. , Staten Island, N.Y. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 39p. AVAILABLEFROM center for Migration studies, 209 ·Flagg Pl ace, Staten Island, Ne v York, New York 10 30 4 ($1.00 papertound) EDRS PRICE IIP-$0. 83 Plus Postage. BC .Not Available fromfro ■ EDRS. DESCRIPTORS cultural Background ; cultural Factors, €Cultural Pluralism; Pluralis ■ ; *Ethnic Groups; Ethnic studies; Futures (of society); Gr oup Membership ; Humaneu ■ an Dignity; Immigrants; I ■■ igrants ; • s ocial Change ; Social Developaent; Social Problems;Proble ■ s· Social Responsibility; •social Stratification; Social structure; Social Systems;sys t e ■ s ; Social Values; *Sociology; Theories ; . •United States History · ABSTRACT · The paper analyzes how the attemptatte ■ pt to assimilateassi ■ ilate ethnic groups into Americansociety has contributed to social, economic, ,cono ■ ic , and political inequality. The hy pothesis is that the official model■ odEl of classical sociology bas blinded us to a ·vast range . of social phenomenaphEno ■ ena which must■ o st be understood if we are to cope with the problems the----proble ■ s of contemporary■ porary lAmerica. ■ erica . While not often e xplicit, the American · 1 ■ er ican ideal that ethnic groofs should be incorporated into the melting ■ eltin9 pot bas created a society in which many■ any observable forms of inequality are perpetrated. This stratification analysis extends the concept of poverty beyond the narrow limitsli ■ its of incomeinco ■e to include political and personal relations. Amongl ■ ong issues addressed are _ i ■ ■ igrant immigrant,. social history, acceptance, po ver and elitist vs .
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Microsociologies a “Confronting the State One on One” “Confronting the Cooley-Mead Address Deception Debate
    2008 Photograph by Patricia G. Steinhoff September • olume 71 • Number 3 V Journal of the American Sociological Association The Journal of Microsociologies A “Confronting the State One on One” Cooley-Mead Address Deception Debate Social Psychology Quarterly September 2008 Vol. 71 No. 3 pp. 209–320 SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY Periodicals postage paid (ISSN 0190–2725) at Washington, DC and 1430 K Street NW, Suite 600 additional mailing offices Washington, DC 20005 Prices subject to change. Applied Social Psychology and Managing Understanding Social Problems Buunk and Linda Steg, Abraham P. Rothengatter Talib 360 pp. 978-0-521-86979-9: Hb: $130.00: 978-0-521-69005-8 Pb: $49.00: Climate, and Culture Affluence, Evert Van de Vliert 256 pp. 978-0-521-51787-4: Hb: $85.00: Culture and Psychology Transmission Cultural and Social, Developmental, Psychological, Methodological Aspects Ute Schönpflug 520 pp. 978-0-521-88043-5: Hb: $99.00: 978-0-521-70657-5 Pb: $36.99: econd Edition! 185.00: Hb: 978-0-521-85259-3: 526 pp. 978-0-521-85259-3: Hb: 185.00: Clinical and Educational Applications Carl Haywood and H. Lidz Carol S. 420 pp. 978-0-521-84935-7: Hb: $79.00: 978-0-521-61412-2 Pb: $27.99: Dynamic Assessment in Practice Jutta Heckhausen and Heinz Heckhausen $ S Motivation and Action from Cambridge University Press University from Cambridge Kory Floyd Kory 240 pp. 978-0-521-73174-4: Pb: $24.99: Communicating Affection Behavior and Interpersonal Social Context Culture, Class, and Child Rearing in Class, Culture, Societies Diverse Jonathan Tudge 328 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: an Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 1959 Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal Elihu Katz University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons Recommended Citation Katz, E. (1959). Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2 1-6. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/165 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/165 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal Abstract In the Spring 1959 issue of the Public Opinion Quarterly, Bernard Berelson explains why he thinks that communication research may be dead. The pioneers in this field, he says, have abandoned their original interests and those who have followed neither measure up to the pioneers nor have they anything very new to contribute. In passing, he cites the demise of the Committee on Communication at the University of Chicago as symbolic of this state of affairs. In their replies, Berelson's critics say, in effect, that it is uncomfortable but challenging to have to protest their own obituary. They cite numerous areas of inquiry and a variety of studies which, for them, are indicative of a continued vitality in the field of communication research.
    [Show full text]
  • Echo Chambers
    AVOIDING THE ECHO CHAMBER ABOUT ECHO CHAMBERS: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think — ANDREW GUESS BRENDAN NYHAN Department of Politics Department of Government knightfoundation.org Princeton University Dartmouth College [email protected] [email protected] BENJAMIN LYONS JASON REIFLER | Department of Politics Department of Politics @knightfdn University of Exeter University of Exeter [email protected] [email protected] CONTENTS AVOIDING THE ECHO CHAMBER ABOUT ECHO CHAMBERS CHAMBER ABOUT ECHO THE ECHO AVOIDING 4 THE ECHO CHAMBERS CRITIQUE 6 SELECTIVE EXPOSURE: A MORE COMPLEX STORY 13 THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL CONTEXT 15 CONCLUSION | 17 REFERENCES Contents knightfoundation.org | @knightfdn 2 / 25 Is the expansion of media choice good for democracy? Not according to critics who decry “echo chambers,” “filter bubbles,” and “information cocoons” — the highly polarized, ideologically homogeneous forms of news and media consumption that are facilitated by technology. However, these claims overstate the prevalence and severity of these patterns, which at most AVOIDING THE ECHO CHAMBER ABOUT ECHO CHAMBERS CHAMBER ABOUT ECHO THE ECHO AVOIDING capture the experience of a minority of the public. In this review essay, we summarize the most important findings of the academic literature about where and how Americans get news and information. We focus particular attention on how much consumers engage in selective exposure to media content that is consistent with their political beliefs and the extent to which this pattern is exacerbated by technology. As we show, the data frequently contradict or at least complicate the “echo chambers” narrative, which has ironically been amplified and distorted in a kind of echo chamber effect.
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL F. LAZARSFELD February 13, 1901-August 30, 1976
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES P A U L F . L AZARSFELD 1901—1976 A Biographical Memoir by DAVID L. SILLS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1987 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. •*» f PAUL F. LAZARSFELD February 13, 1901-August 30, 1976 BY DAVID L. SILLS AUL FELIX LAZARSFELD was born and raised in Vienna. PIn 1933 he came to the United States as a Rockefeller Foundation fellow. He remained in America at the end of his fellowship, became a citizen, and for three decades was a professor of sociology at Columbia University. He died of cancer in New York City. Although he was trained in mathematics, Lazarsfeld thought of himself as a psychologist; only in midlife did he identify himself as a sociologist. His major interests were the methodology of social research and the development of in- stitutes for training and research in the social sciences. Be- cause of the originality and diversity of his ideas, his energy and personal magnetism, his unique style of collaboration with colleagues and students, and the productivity of the re- search institutes he established, his influence upon sociology and social research—both in the United States and in Eu- rope—has been profound. In the years since Lazarsfeld's death, a substantial number of appraisals of his life and work have been published.1 I shall 1 Appraisals up to 1979 are listed in David L. Sills, "Publications About Paul F.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Analysis: a Method in Social Science Research. In
    10 Content Analysis A method in Social Science Research 1 B Devi Prasad Content Analysis is described as the scientific study of content of communication. It is the study of the content with reference to the meanings, contexts and intentions contained in messages. The term Content Analysis is 75 years old, and Webster’s Dictionary of English language listed it since 1961. In 1952, Bernard Berelson published Content analysis in Communication Research, which heralded recognition for the technique as a versatile tool for social science and media researchers. Some scholars adopted it for historical and political research as well (Holsti, 1968). However, the method achieved greater popularity among social science scholars as well as a method of communication research (Wimmer and Dominick, 1994:163). The development of content analysis as a full-fledged scientific method took place during World War II when the U.S. government sponsored a project under the directorship of Harold Lasswell to evaluate enemy propaganda. The resources made available for research and the methodological advances made in the context of the problems studied under the project contributed significantly to the emergence of the methodology in content analysis. One of the out comes of the project, the book entitled Language of Politics published in 1940s (Lasswell et. al. 1965), still remains a classic in the field of content analysis. Later on, the method spread to other disciplines (Woodrum, 1984). 1 From: Lal Das, D.K and Bhaskaran, V (eds.). (2008) Research methods for Social Work , New Delhi:Rawat, pp. 173-193. 1 Content Analysis. A method of Social Science Research.CSS Definition and purpose of Content analysis Content denotes what is contained and content analysis is the analysis of what is contained in a message.
    [Show full text]
  • No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread Via Interpersonal Discussions
    No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions James N. Druckman Northwestern University Matthew S. Levendusky University of Pennsylvania Audrey McLain Temple University Abstract: To what extent do partisan media sources shape public opinion? On its face, it would appear that the impact of partisan media is limited, given that it attracts a relatively small audience. We argue, however, that its influence may extend beyond its direct audience via a two-step communication flow. Specifically, those who watch and are impacted by partisan media outlets talk to and persuade others who did not watch. We present experimental results that demonstrate this process. We therefore show that previous studies may have significantly underestimated the effect of these outlets. We also illustrate that how the two-step communication flow works is contingent upon the precise composition of the discussion group (e.g., is it consistent of all fellow partisans or a mix of partisans?). We conclude by highlighting what our results imply about the study of media, preference formation, and partisan polarization. Replication Materials: The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this arti- cle are available on the American Journal of Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: http://doi:10.7910/DVN/TJKIWN. he last quarter century has given rise to a funda- by partisan media talk to and persuade others who did mentally different media landscape. One of the not watch. The result is that the partisan media influ- T most noted changes, when it comes to politics, ences nonwatchers via a two-step communication flow concerns the expansion of partisan media.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 74-3108
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page{s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • EU 049 804 INSTITUTION PUB DATE AVAILABLE FRCM Eres PRICE DESCRIPTORS IDENTIFIERS ABSTRACT DOCUMENT RESUME LI 002 786 Penland, P
    DOCUMENT RESUME EU 049 804 LI 002 786 AUTHOR Penland, Patrick E. TITLE -Communication fcr Librarians. INSTITUTION Pittsburgh Univ., Pa. Graduate School of Library and _Information Sciences. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 189p. AVAILABLE FRCM Bookstore, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213 ($2.50) ErEs PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$6.L.3 DESCRIPTORS *Communication (Thought Transfer), Communication Problems, Communication Skills, Content Analysis, Cybernetics, *Information Dissemination, *Information Science, *Information Theory, *Information Utilization, Librarians, Library Education, Library Science IDENTIFIERS *Epistemology ABSTRACT This preliminary work in human communication for librarians is designed to help the library profession address itself to significant communication problems. As they relate to the library and information sciences, the three major areas of communication science covered are: (1) History and theory of communication and culture, organization and function of communication institutions, and communication structures in biological and social organization; (2) Transfer of meaning, design and processing of messages in different media, analysis cf message content and systems; and (3) Individual behavior, social interaction and experience, attitude formation and change, public opinion and collective behavior, and the consequence of exposure to various messages. A listing of 253 references is included.(See also LI 002 783 to LI 002 7835.)(Author/MF) "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS COPY- RIGHTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY &thii_ le%Pei/AWL_ TO ERIC AND ORGANIZATIONS OPERATING UNDER AGREEMENTS WITH THE U.S. OFFICE OF EDUCATION. FURTHER REPRODUCTION OUTSIDE THE ERIC SYSTEM REWIRES PER- MISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNER?' 1.: COMMUNICATION FOR LIBRARIANS 1.: Patrick R. Penland Graduate School of Library and Information Science is U.S.
    [Show full text]