B-Solutions FINAL REPORT by the EXPERT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

B-Solutions FINAL REPORT by the EXPERT Managed by the Association of European Border Regions by an Action Grant (CCI2017CE160AT082) agreed with the Directorate General of Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission. Financed by the European Union. b-solutions FINAL REPORT BY THE EXPERT Advice Case: Juridical obstacles in establishment and financing of trans-national business incubator Advised Entity: Lazdijai District Municipality, LT Expert: Marcin Krzymuski Table of Content: I. Description of the Obstacle II. Indication of the Legal/Administrative Dispositions causing the Obstacle III. Description of a Possible Solution IV. Pre-assessment of whether the Case could be solved with the ECBM V. Other Relevant Aspects to this Case VI. References and Appendix/Appendices if any 1 Managed by the Association of European Border Regions by an Action Grant (CCI2017CE160AT082) agreed with the Directorate General of Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission. Financed by the European Union. I. Description of the Obstacle Lazdiju rajono savivaldybe (Lazdijai Region Self-Government) wants together with Lithuanian and Polish local governments to establish international business incubator in Polish-Lithuanian borderland area. Many local business development agencies, governments and other public institutions have used incubators as a tool to reduce the likelihood of failure and speed up the process of starting a business.1 The main objective of public business incubators is to reduce the costs of doing business by offering a set of services ranging from the provision of space, infrastructures and facilities, to more elaborate services, as well as by offering access to technical and managerial expertise, assistance in business plan development, etc. In the course of talks with actors of cross-border cooperation conducted on 19.9.2019 in Lazdiaji and on 20.9.2019 in Suwałki, the tasks of the incubator are to be substantive support in the form of provision of advisory services (legal, accounting, tax and later financial) for entities planning to start business activity on the Polish-Lithuanian border. At present, the nearest business support centres operate in Suwałki and Kaunas, i.e. far from the border area itself and are not available to entities on the other side of the border. This hampers the creation of joint business projects by natural persons from the border area. However, support for economic development falls within the competence of local authorities in Poland (see Art. 6 of Polish Act on Municipal Self-Government2 - ['all public matters of local importance not reserved by statutes for other entities']) and in Lithuania (Act on Local Self-Government3 - Art. 6 No 38 [“creation of conditions for the development of business and tourism, and promotion of such activities”]). The municipalities are therefore looking for possibilities for a joint and thus cost-efficient provision of these services to the population from the border region. The Polish and Lithuanian law on public finances and cooperation of public entities does not allow for direct financing of activities in foreign self-governments. Financial supervision is based on the assumption that the transfer of public funds abroad is not acceptable. Therefore, from the applicant's point of view, there are no possibilities of establishing of common entities and finance such entities by Lithuanian or Polish municipalities. II. Indication of the Legal/Administrative Dispositions causing the Obstacle Legal obstacles result from both Lithuanian and Polish law regulations. 1 Grimaldi R., Grandi A., 2005, p. 112. 2 Polish Official Journal of 1990 No 16 item 95 with amendments. 3 Lithuanian Law on Local Self-Government, 7 July 1994 No I-533 (Last amended on 15 May 2014 XII-883). 2 Managed by the Association of European Border Regions by an Action Grant (CCI2017CE160AT082) agreed with the Directorate General of Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission. Financed by the European Union. 1. Lithuanian Law Lithuanian Law on Local Governments in Art. 16 (2) point 42 of the Act theoretically allows municipal council to deicide to join inter-national association of local governments with intention to sign cooperation agreements, but there is not written, that it can decide to join and create common company or organizational structure with itself budget. 2. The exclusive competence of the municipal council shall be as follows: (…) 42) taking of decisions on joining municipality unions, co-operation with municipalities of foreign states or joining international self-government organisations; In Art. 22 (4) of the Law on the Management, Use and Disposal of State and Municipal Assets is written that the municipality may invest the assets by acquiring shares of a public limited company or private limited company that is to be founded or increases its share capital by giving more than 50 per cent of the votes to the state or municipality (municipalities) at the general meeting of shareholders. It is not clear what will happen and how should be counted number of votes if entity will be created by more than one local-government and if self-governments will be from two different countries. 4. The State or a municipality may invest the assets by acquiring the shares of a public limited liability company or a private limited liability company being incorporated or increasing its authorised capital, which grant over 50 per cent of votes to the State or the municipality (municipalities), or to them collectively, at a general meeting of shareholders. Additionally, in Point 6, Paragraph 1 of Art. 22 of the Law on the Management, Use and Disposal of State and Municipal Assets4 is written that Local governments may create international entities if it foreseen in other laws. Problem is that till now, there are no such laws or implementing rules. 1. Investment of state and municipal assets shall mean the transfer, as a contribution, of assets belonging to the State or a municipality by the right of ownership: (…) 6) in the course of acquiring units offered by an investment fund established in the Republic of Lithuania or another EU Member State or a state of the European Economic Area and investing the accumulated funds in the Republic of Lithuania, which is a private capital collective investment undertaking. This point shall not apply to the investment of municipal assets. 4 Law on the Management, Use and Disposal of State and Municipal Assets of 12.5.1998, No VIII-729 (last amended on 17 November 2015 No XII-2023) 3 Managed by the Association of European Border Regions by an Action Grant (CCI2017CE160AT082) agreed with the Directorate General of Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission. Financed by the European Union. 2. Polish Law Polish law also generates some obstacles to effective cooperation in this area. a. Creation Of Joint Units By Local Governments Also according to Polish law, it is not possible to establish joint municipal units with foreign self- governments. The Act on Municipal Self-Government in Art. 64 allows for the creation of the so-called inter-communal association and Art. 84 of private-law associations. However, these entities may be established only with Polish local government units. Art. 64 1. In order to perform public tasks jointly, municipalities may form intercommunal associations. Art. 84 1. In order to support the idea of local self-government and to defend common interests, municipalities may form associations, including with poviats and voivodships. International associations of local and regional communities are an exception. Polish municipalities may accede to such associations on the basis of Art. 172 (2) of the Polish Constitution5, Art. 84a of the Act on Municipal Self-Government and the Act of 15.9.2000 on the principles of accession of local government units to international associations of local and regional communities6. However, as follows from the provisions of the Act, Accession to the association may not be associated with the transfer to it or to any of the members associated in it of the performance of public tasks of the joining local government unit (Art. 3 of the Act). Art. 3 Accession to the association may not be associated with the transfer to it or to any of the members associated in it of the performance of public tasks of the joining local government unit, or real estate or property rights to intangible assets vested in that unit. These powers as well as the constitutionally guaranteed right to cooperate with local and regional communities of other countries stem from the commitments made by Poland following the ratification of the European Framework Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities and Authorities, signed in Madrid on 21.5.1980.7 b. Transfer Of Public Funds Abroad Similarly, local government entities, as units of the public finance sector, do not have the right to make transfers of public funds abroad. The interpretation made by the supervisory authorities with regard to Art. 220 and Art. 221 of the Act on Public Finance8 therefore excludes, for example, the granting of targeted subsidies by the Polish self-government to foreign entities. Thus, subsidies for activities 5 Polish Official Journal of 1997 No 78 item 483 with amendment. 6 Polish Official Journal of 2000 No 91 item 1009 with amendment. 7 Polish Official Journal of 1993 No 61 item 287. 8 Polish Official Journal of 2009 No 157 item 1240 with amendments. 4 Managed by the Association of European Border Regions by an Action Grant (CCI2017CE160AT082) agreed with the Directorate General of Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission. Financed by the European Union. conducted by an entity located abroad, even if it acts for the benefit of Polish entities, are generally excluded. The so-called subsidies within the framework of the so-called European projects are an exception. III. Description of a Possible Solution The following solutions are possible: starting with an interpretation of the previously presented national regulations open to cross-border cooperation (e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Lithuanian Synagogues: from the First Descriptions to Systematic Research
    arts Article Lithuanian Synagogues: From the First Descriptions to Systematic Research Vilma Gradinskaite Independent scholar, 05224 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: The article presents an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania during the four major historical periods of the country—Lithuania in the Russian Empire (1795–1918), Vilnius Region in the interwar period and the independent Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940), the Soviet period (1940–1990), and the independent Republic of Lithuania restored in 1990. Each chapter of the article deals with the issues of synagogue research, heritage conservation and management, while the part about the restored independent Republic of Lithuania and modern days includes topical issues related to synagogue restoration, commemoration and putting them into operation. The study uses two different sources: archival materials and publications. Written sources and publications are reviewed in chronological order and start from the end of the 18th century. The study employs several research methods—the historical descriptive method, the comparative method and the analysis method. Keywords: Lithuania; synagogues; conservation; restoration; renovation; rebuilding; management; commemoration 1. Introduction The article presents several fields of study: (1) a review of the first descriptions of synagogues in Lithuania; (2) an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania; and (3) a brief reference to synagogue restoration, renovation, rebuilding, commemoration and putting into operation—topics which are currently particularly live in Lithuania today. It is not possible to understand the existing trends in synagogue research in Lithuania without considering the country’s past—the times of the Russian Empire, the interwar period and the Soviet period.
    [Show full text]
  • Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve Action Plan Baltic Environmental Forum Lithuania Elvyra Mikšytė, Justas Gulbinas, Audronė Alijošiutė - Paulauskienė
    Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve Action Plan Baltic Environmental Forum Lithuania Elvyra Mikšytė, Justas Gulbinas, Audronė Alijošiutė - Paulauskienė 1. Case Area Description The Dovinė River Catchment covers an area of approximately 588.7 km2 and is located in the southern part of Lithuania (see Figure 1). The basin is one of the small catchment areas of the larger Neman river basin, which covers around 75% of the territory of Lithuania and is the 4th river basin in size in the whole Baltic Sea Region. The Dovinė river catchment is located in the southern Lithuania (see Figure 2) and consists of a network of rivers and water bodies formed by five big lakes (Dusia 23,3 km2, Zuvintas 9,3 km2, Figure 1. Location of Dovinė Catchment area. Simnas 2,4 km2, Giluitis 2,4 km2, Amalvas 1,9 Source: Nature Heritage Fund km2) and a number of rivulets and small lakes (see Annex 1). Within the borders of the basin lies one of the oldest and most unique protected areas of Lithuania – Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve. The reserve lies in the junction of three municipalities (Alytus district municipality, Lazdijai district municipality and Marijampolė municipality). This one of the most valuable Natura 2000 territories in the country hosts valuable habitats for biodiversity, breeding and feeding areas for protected species, especially migratory birds (see Figure 2). Figure 2. A gaggle of geese flocking in Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve during migration. Source: Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve Directorate 1 A lot of species found in the area are listed in the Birds Directive Annex 1 and the Habitats Directive Annex 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Rural Development – Potential of Ecotourism in Lazdijai Research Paper Nord+ 2018 Intensive Field Course
    Green Rural Development – Potential of Ecotourism in Lazdijai Research Paper Nord+ 2018 Intensive Field Course University of Latvia University of Vilnius University of Eastern Finland 23. April – 4. May 2018 Margarita Kairjaka, Paulė Tamašauskaitė Patrik Hämäläinen, Franziska Wolff VILNIUS 2018 Table of contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Theoretical framework .................................................................................................................... 5 Lazdijai district municipality ...................................................................................................... 5 Tourism and ecotourism in Lithuania ......................................................................................... 5 The role of the European Union and Cross border cooperation ................................................. 7 Communities and connections .................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 9 Results and discussion .................................................................................................................. 11 Interviews
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in Magdeburgian Cities of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Late- 16Th and Early-17Th Century 1 Gitana Zujienė
    LITHUANIAN historical STUDIES 19 2014 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 83–110 THE DEATH PENALTY IN MAGDEBURGIAN CITIES OF THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE LATE- 16TH AND Early-17TH CENTury 1 Gitana Zujienė ABSTRACT In the article, based on the acts of Magdeburg Law and the court books of Magdeburgian cities, the issue of the death penalty in Magdeburgian cities of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania is analysed. The most often imposed death penalties are discussed. There is an analysis of which crimes they were given for. Their use is compared with data from Poland and some Magdeburgian cities in Western Europe. Along with baptism, German city, or Magdeburg, Law came to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. Lithuania’s capital Vilnius 2 received such a charter first, following the example of Cracow, on 22 March 1387. Soon afterwards, it was given to Brest, 3 Kaunas, 4 and perhaps Trakai. 5 By the middle of the 17th century, several dozen cities in the grand duchy used it. The charter was granted to smaller cities following the example of larger ones. For example, on 26 July 1531, the privilege was given to Voinė on the example of Brest, 6 in 1616 to Joniškis on the example of the Magdeburgian city of Kaunas. 7 1 This article is prepared in fulfilling the Research Council of Lithuania within the framework of the ‘National Lithuanian Studies Development Programme for 2009–2015’ funded project ‘The Death Penalty in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 14th to the Early-17th Century: Theory and Practice’ (LIT-5–18).
    [Show full text]
  • Dėl Laikinų Vietinio Reguliaraus Susisiekimo Autobusų Maršrutų Ir Jų Tvarkaraščių Nustatymo
    Elektroninio dokumento nuorašas LAZDIJŲ RAJONO SAVIVALDYBĖS ADMINISTRACIJOS DIREKTORIUS ĮSAKYMAS DĖL LAIKINŲ VIETINIO (PRIEMIESTINIO) REGULIARAUS SUSISIEKIMO AUTOBUSŲ MARŠRUTŲ IR JŲ TVARKARAŠČIŲ NUSTATYMO 2018 m. birželio 12 d. Nr. 10V-492 Lazdijai Vadovaudamasi Lietuvos Respublikos vietos savivaldos įstatymo 29 straipsnio 8 dalies 2 punktu, Lietuvos Respublikos kelių transporto kodekso 4 straipsnio 3 dalimi, Leidimų vežti keleivius reguliaraus susisiekimo kelių transporto maršrutais išdavimo taisyklių, patvirtintų Lietuvos Respublikos susisiekimo ministro 2006 m. vasario 14 d. įsakymu Nr. 3-62 „Dėl Leidimų vežti keleivius reguliaraus susisiekimo kelių transporto maršrutais išdavimo taisyklių patvirtinimo“, 10 ir 12 punktais, Lazdijų rajono savivaldybės tarybos 2003 m. rugpjūčio 12 d. sprendimo Nr. 5TS-137 „Dėl vietinio susisiekimo autobusų maršrutų Lazdijų rajone“ 1.2 papunkčiu ir Vežėjo (operatoriaus) parinkimo viešųjų paslaugų įsipareigojimams vykdyti Lazdijų rajono savivaldybėje sutarties Nr. 2018-05-23/53-97, 2018 m. gegužės 23 d. pasirašytos Lazdijų rajono savivaldybės administracijos ir uždarosios akcinės bendrovės „Lazdijų autobusų parkas“, 1 ir 3 punktais bei atsižvelgdama į UAB „Lazdijų autobusų parkas“ 2018-06-12 suderinimą Nr. 2-2376 „Dėl autobusų eismo“: 1. N u s t a t a u: 1.1. Laikinus vietinio (priemiestinio) reguliaraus susisiekimo autobusų maršrutus ir tvarkaraščius, kuriais važiuos UAB „Lazdijų autobusų parkas“ priklausantys autobusai, nuo 2018 m. birželio 18 d. iki 2018 m. rugpjūčio 31 d. (įskaitytinai) (laikini vietinio (priemiestinio) reguliaraus susisiekimo autobusų maršrutai ir jų tvarkaraščiai pridedami); 1.2. Kad nuo 2018 m. birželio 18 d. iki 2018 m. rugpjūčio 31 d. (įskaitytinai) Lazdijų rajono savivaldybės administracijos direktoriaus 2016 m. sausio 26 d. įsakymo Nr. 10V-64 „Dėl vietinio reguliaraus susisiekimo autobusų maršrutų ir jų tvarkaraščių nustatymo“ priede nurodytais vietinio (priemiestinio) reguliaraus susisiekimo autobusų maršrutais ir tvarkaraščiais autobusai nevažiuos.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Identifying and Regulating the Structure of the Labour Market in Depressive Lithuanian Regions
    Journal of Business Economics and Management ISSN 1611-1699 2006, Vol VII, No 4, 223–233 PROBLEMS OF IDENTIFYING AND REGULATING THE STRUCTURE OF THE LABOUR MARKET IN DEPRESSIVE LITHUANIAN REGIONS Algis Šileika 1, Daiva Andriušaitienė 2 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 26 June 2006, accepted 9 Spalio 2006 Abstract. In order to identify labour market problems in the depressive regions of Lithuania and to provide guiding lines in the search for their solution, it is necessary to conduct a systematic analysis of the structure of employable population encompassing the characteristics of segments of employed and unemployed persons as well as individuals not registered with the official labour market. Correlation and factor analysis of eighteen macroeconomic indicators investigating into indicators of all municipalities of the country and depressive regions separately (20 municipalities where the unemploy- ment rate exceeded the average in the country by 1,5 times in 2004) enabled evaluation of the significance of employment and unemployment indicators as well as impact thereof on other indicators chosen for the analysis to feature the trends of social and economic development on national level and in depressive regions in 1996–2004. Apart from special socio- logical research, characterization of the structure and peculiarities of labour force is confined to assumptions of logical analysis, but the invented technologies give grounds to maintain that dynamics of the employment indicator reflects the trends and outcomes of the development of economic activities only to a certain limited extent.
    [Show full text]
  • 1/3 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original
    G/SPS/N/ALB/178 14 August 2014 (14-4725) Page: 1/3 Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Original: English NOTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY MEASURES 1. Notifying Member: ALBANIA If applicable, name of local government involved: 2. Agency responsible: Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Management 3. Products covered (provide tariff item number(s) as specified in national schedules deposited with the WTO; ICS numbers should be provided in addition, where applicable): Live animals (domestic and wild pigs), fresh meat of domestic and wild pigs, semen of domestic and wild pigs 4. Regions or countries likely to be affected, to the extent relevant or practicable: [ ] All trading partners [X] Specific regions or countries: 1. Lithuania: a. in Vilnius county (apskritis): the Ðalèininkai district municipality; b. in Alytus county (apskritis): the Lazdijai district municipality, Varëna district municipality, Alytus district municipality, Alytus city municipality and the Druskininkai municipality. 2. Poland: In podlaskie voivodship: the municipalities of Giby and Sejny with the city of Sejny in sejneñski district; the municipalities of Lipsk and Pùaska in augustowski district; the municipalities of Czarna Biaùostocka, Gródek, Supraúl, Wasilków and Michaùowo in biaùostocki district; the municipalities of Dàbrowa Biaùostocka, Janów, Krynki, Kuênica, Nowy Dwór, Sidra, Sokóùka and Szudziaùowo in sokólski district. 3. Italy: All areas of Sardinia. 4. Latvia: In the district of Rezekne parish Pusa, Mâkoòkalna and Kaunatas; The entire county of Dagda; In the villages Aglonas Ðíeltovas, Grâveru and Kastuïinas; All county Krâslavas; In the district of Parishes Ludza Rundenu and Istria; In the district of the parish of Zilupe PASIENES. 5. Title of the notified document: Order of the Minister of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Management "On some protective measures against the African Swine Fever disease in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Italy" Language(s): Albanian Number of pages: 2 G/SPS/N/ALB/178 - 2 - 6.
    [Show full text]
  • UAB Cityform LT Įmon Ės Kodas: 304696907 / Žygio G
    UAB CityForm LT Įmon ės kodas: 304696907 / Žygio g. 97A-101, LT-08236 Vilnius Tel.: +370 616 54100, el. p.: [email protected] Įmon ės kodas: 160297055 / Taikos pr. 88A, LT-51183 Kaunas Tel.: 8 (65) 771999, el. p.: [email protected] PLANAVIMO LAZDIJ Ų RAJONO SAVIVALDYB ĖS ADMINISTRACIJOS ORGANIZATORIUS DIREKTORIUS Kodas Juridini ų asmen ų registre 188714992 Vilniaus g. 1, LT-67106 Lazdijai tel. (8 318) 66 108, el.p. [email protected] TERITORIJ Ų PLANAVIMO LAZDIJ Ų RAJONO SAVIVALDYB ĖS TERITORIJOS DOKUMENTO BENDROJO PLANO KEITIMAS. KONCEPCIJA PAVADINIMAS PLANUOJAMA TERITORIJA Lazdij ų rajono savivaldyb ės teritorija TERITORIJ Ų PLANAVIMO KOMPLEKSINIS DOKUMENTO R ŪŠIS POR ŪŠIS BENDRASIS PLANAS LYGMUO SAVIVALDYB ĖS ETAPAS RENGIMO STADIJA KONCEPCIJA BYLOS ŽYMUO CF-19U-31 TOMAS II DATA 2019 Atest.Nr. Pareigos Vardas Pavard ė Parašas UAB CityForm LT GITANA MINEIKIEN Ė DIREKTOR Ė PROJEKTO ATP1735 GIEDR Ė RATKUT Ė SKA ČKAUSKIEN Ė VADOV Ė PROJEKTO TPV0105 GITANA MINEIKIEN Ė VADOVO KOORD. UAB „Geometra“ EGIDIJUS STAŠELIS DIREKTORIUS UAB „Geometra“ ATP1816 GINTAR Ė KARPAVI ČIEN Ė Architekt ė Lazdij ų rajono savivaldyb ės teritorijos bendrojo plano keitimas KONCEPCIJA TURINYS Darb ą parengusi ų specialist ų s ąrašas .................................................................................................................. 3 Įvadas .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Lazdij ų rajono savivaldyb ės teritorijos bendrojo
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Managing the Implementation of Education Policy in Lithuania: the Role of Small Municipalities
    ISSN 0798 1015 HOME Revista ESPACIOS ÍNDICES / Index A LOS AUTORES / To the ! ! AUTORS ! Vol. 40 (Number 26) Year 2019. Page 11 Problems in managing the implementation of education policy in Lithuania: The role of small municipalities Problemas en la gestión de la aplicación de la política de educación en Lituania: El papel de los pequeños municipios SMALSKYS, Vainius 1; STASIUKYNAS, Andrius 2; GAVKALOVA, Nataliia L. 3 & LASEVIČIŪTĖ, Ugnė 4 Received: 05/04/2019 • Approved: 24/06/2019 • Published 29/07/2019 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusions Bibliographic references ABSTRACT: RESUMEN: This article examines the competencies of local Este artículo examina las competencias de las authorities and how they are being applied in autoridades locales y cómo se aplican en el ámbito de education arena, with reference to prevailing laws and la educación, con referencia a las leyes vigentes y los the planning documents that a local authority must documentos de planificación que una autoridad local adhere to. The paper explores the major problems debe cumplir. El documento explora los principales they confront while managing education in their problemas que enfrentan al administrar la educación jurisdictions. The article concludes that input from en sus jurisdicciones. El artículo concluye que se parents and the wider public is needed if the New necesita la participación de los padres y del público en Public Management principles are to be successfully general para que los principios de la Nueva Gestión implemented. Pública se implementen con éxito. Keywords: local authorities, local self - government, Palabras clave: Autoridades locales; Autogobierno education, public local; Educación; Administración Pública 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alytaus Regiono 2010 – 2020 Metų Plėtros Planas
    ALYTAUS REGIONO PLĖTROS TARYBA ALYTAUS APSKRITIES VIRŠININKO ADMINISTRACIJA ALYTAUS REGIONO 2010 – 2020 METŲ PLĖTROS PLANAS ALYTUS, 2010 Alytaus regiono 2010 – 2020 metų plėtros planas Uţsakovas Alytaus apskrities viršininko administracija Paslaugų teikėjas Viešoji įstaiga „PVC― Ugniagesių g. 1, Alytus Tel. (8 315) 52 127, faks. (8 315) 52 127 www.pvc.lt Alytaus regiono plėtros planas parengtas įgyvendinant Alytaus apskrities viršininko administracijos projektą „Alytaus regiono plėtros 2010 – 2020 metų plano parengimas― (projekto Nr. VP1-4.2-VRM-02-R-11-003), kurį finansuoja Europos Socialinis fondas ir Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė pagal Ţmogiškųjų išteklių plėtros veiksmų programos 4 prioriteto „Administracinių gebėjimų stiprinimas ir viešojo administravimo efektyvumo didinimas― įgyvendinimo priemonę VP1-4.2-VRM-02-R „Regioninės plėtros tobulinimas, regionų plėtros planai ir savivaldybių (ilgalaikiai / trumpalaikiai) strateginiai plėtros planai―. 2 Alytaus regiono 2010 – 2020 metų plėtros planas DALYVAVUSIEJI ALYTAUS REGIONO 2010 – 2020 METŲ PLĖTROS PLANO RENGIME 1. Romualdas Vilniaus prekybos, pramonės ir amatų [email protected] Ambroţevičius rūmų Alytaus filialo direktorius 2. Antanas Alytaus krašto pramonininkų asociacijos [email protected] Andriulionis prezidentas 3. Romas Balčius AAVA RPD Aplinkos ir viešųjų ryšių [email protected] skyriaus vyriausiasis specialistas 4. Vydas Baravykas Lietuvos valstybinio ţuvivaisos ir [email protected] ţuvininkystės tyrimų centro Simno eksperimentinio ţuvų veislyno direktorius 5. Kęstutis Alytaus apskrities Kultūros ir meno [email protected] Bernatavičius tarybos pirmininkas, šokių studijos „Alemana― pirmininkas 6. Ramūnas Alytaus rajono savivaldybės tarybos narys [email protected] Bielevičius 7. Algimantas Alytaus apskrities viršininkas [email protected] Braţionis 8. Pranas Celevičius Varėnos miškų urėdijos urėdas [email protected] 9. Česlovas Daugėla Alytaus miesto savivaldybės meras [email protected] 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Alytaus Regiono Turizmo Plėtros Galimybių Studija
    ALYTAUS REGIONO TURIZMO PLĖTROS GALIMYBIŲ STUDIJA ALYTAUS REGIONO TURIZMO PLĖTROS GALIMYBIŲ STUDIJA Turizmo plėtros galimybių studija parengta įgyvendinant projektą Nr. VP1-4.2-VRM-02-R-12-004 „Alytaus regiono plėtros 2010–2020 metų plano atnaujinimas“. Projektas nansuojamas ES fondų, LR valstybės ir savivaldybių administracijų biudžeto lėšomis pagal Žmogiškųjų išteklių plėtros veiksmų programos 4 prioriteto „Administracinių gebėjimų stiprinimas ir viešojo administravimo efektyvumo didinimas“ įgyvendinimo priemonę VP1-4.2-VRM-02-R „Regioninės plėtros tobulinimas, regionų plėtros planai ir savivaldybių (ilgalaikiai / trumpalaikiai) strateginiai plėtros planai“. ALYTAUS REGIONO TURIZMO PLĖTROS GALIMYBIŲ STUDIJA 1 2 ALYTAUS REGIONO TURIZMO PLĖTROS GALIMYBIŲ STUDIJA TURINYS SANTRAUKA 4 SUMMARY 8 ESAMOS SITUACIJOS ANALIZĖ TURIZMO SEKTORIUJE INFRASTRUKTŪRA IR PASLAUGOS ALYTAUS REGIONE PAGAL SAVIVALDYBES 13 1. Veikiantys turizmo traukos objektai savivaldybėse 14 1.1. Bendra Alytaus regiono esamos situacijos apžvalga 14 1.1.1. Gamtiniai ištekliai 18 1.1.2. Viešasis poilsio ir rekreacijos turizmas 22 1.1.3. Kultūros turizmas 26 1.1.4. Aktyvaus poilsio ir laisvalaikio turizmas 36 1.1.5. Sveikatingumo turizmas 46 1.1.6. Vandens turizmas 50 1.1.7. Dalykinis (konferencinis) turizmas 56 1.1.8. Alytaus regiono savivaldybių pasiekiamumas 60 1.1.9. Apgyvendinimas 64 1.1.10. Maitinimas 70 1.2. Turizmo informacijos centrų veikla ir informacijos sklaida 74 1.3. Turizmo sektoriaus investicijos 80 2. Regiono savivaldybių turimi patvirtinti ir parengti dokumentai (studijos, strategijos) 88 NAUJŲ TURIZMO PLĖTROS PROJEKTŲ PANAUDOJIMO GALIMYBĖS ALYTAUS REGIONE PAGAL SAVIVALDYBES 91 3. Alytaus regiono plėtros 2010–2020 metų plano rezultatų, poveikio, efektyvumo ir organizacinių vykdymo procedūrų įvertinimas 92 4. Naujų, kompleksinių turizmo plėtros projektų identikavimas savivaldybėse 102 5.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Cities of Lithuania
    Population Population Granted city SNo City County Municipality (2001) (2011) rights 1 Vilnius 554,281 535,631 1387 Vilnius County Vilnius city municipality 2 Kaunas 378,943 315,993 1408 Kaunas County Kaunas city municipality Klaipeda 3 Klaipeda 192,954 162,360 1257 Klaipeda city municipality County 4 Siauliai 133,883 109,328 1589 Siauliai County Siauliai city municipality Panevezys Panevezys city 5 Panevezys 119,749 99,690 1837 County municipality 6 Alytus 71,491 59,964 1581 Alytus County Alytus city municipality Marijampole 7 Marijampole 48,675 47,010 1792 Marijampole municipality County Mazeikiai district 8 Mazeikiai 42,675 40,572 1924 Telsiai County municipality Jonava district 9 Jonava 34,954 34,446 1864 Kaunas County municipality 10 Utena 33,860 32,572 1599 Utena County Utena district municipality Kedainiai district 11 Kedainiai 32,048 31,055 1590 Kaunas County municipality Telsiai district 12 Telsiai 31,460 30,011 1791 Telsiai County municipality 13 Visaginas 29,554 28,269 1977 Utena County Visaginas municipality Taurage district 14 Taurage 29,124 27,862 1924 Taurage County municipality Ukmerge district 15 Ukmerge 28,759 27,603 1486 Vilnius County municipality Plunge district 16 Plunge 23,436 23,187 1792 Telsiai County municipality Klaipeda 17 Silute 21,476 20,945 1941 Silute district municipality County Klaipeda Kretinga district 18 Kretinga 21,423 21,452 1609 County municipality Radviliskis district 19 Radviliskis 20,339 19,625 1923 Siauliai County municipality 20 Druskininkai 18,233 16,263 1893 Alytus County Druskininkai municipality
    [Show full text]