DOCSLIB.ORG

Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX GAVIN OSBOURNE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY MOSAICS OF POWER: SUPERSTITION, MAGIC AND CHRISTIAN POWER IN EARLY BYZANTINE FLOOR MOSAICS VOLUME 1 SEPTEMBER 2014 3 UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX GAVIN OSBOURNE THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY MOSAICS OF POWER: SUPERSTITION, MAGIC AND CHRISTIAN POWER IN EARLY BYZANTINE FLOOR MOSAICS SUMMARY This thesis argues that some Early Byzantine floor mosaics had, in addition to a practical and decorative role, a supernatural function. By this I mean the images and words depicted within the mosaic were perceived as devices to attract powers from a supernatural dimension, for the benefit of those that walked over the mosaic or the building that housed it. The thesis is ultimately a discussion of the Byzantines’ beliefs in the power of art and text, and how they were believed to intervene and affect everyday life. My examination is carried out with a focus on the floor mosaics produced between the fourth and seventh centuries in the Byzantine Empire. Using an iconographic methodological approach, the thesis explores how certain images and words incorporated within mosaic designs can be seen in supernatural terms. To do so, comparable material objects with clearer supernatural functions will be examined. Primary sources that indicate how certain motifs were perceived to bring about powers will also be analysed. In this thesis, I analyse the different kinds of devices that were depicted to attract supernatural powers and explore why those devices were believed to have the ability to generate powers. The thesis illustrates how power could be seen as being rooted in Christianity, magic or more unclear sources. Expanding on this discussion, I explore how a single mosaic could incorporate elements from several sources, dispelling scholarship that portrays the Early Byzantine period as predominately influenced by Christianity. The other key function of the thesis is to emphasise the fact that mosaics can be considered in terms of the conscious design process of their construction, placing them within the same category as gemstones and icons in terms of purposeful objects. 4 CONTENTS Volume 1 Acknowledgements 6 List of Abbreviations 7 List of Maps and a List of Illustrations 8 Note to the Reader 15 INTRODUCTION 16 The Aims of the Thesis 24 Approaching Mosaics of Power 28 The Power of Objects and Images in Early Byzantium 38 Beliefs and Multivalence of Powers 41 An Outline of the Thesis 54 CHAPTER ONE: THE POWER OF SYMBOLS 57 A Set of Symbols at Adeitha 58 Antioch: Symbols on the Threshold 71 Protective and Beneficial Symbols at Beit Mery 77 Zahrani: the Repetition of Motifs 82 CHAPTER TWO: THE POWER OF CREATURES 89 ‘Like when the Phoenix Renews its Burden Limbs’: The Phoenix at Antioch 91 ‘Immunity From Decay’: The Peacock at Carthage 97 Unusual Depictions: The Anguipede at Antigoneia 102 Good Fortune through Horses and Chariots at Thugga 107 5 CHAPTER THREE: THE POWER OF PERSONIFICATIONS 113 The Depiction of Humans in Floor Mosaics 113 The Lack of Christian Figures 117 Personifications; the New Saints 118 Ktisis’ Foundational Powers at Kourion 122 ‘The Fruitful Mother of All Things’: Ge at Antioch 128 Safety and Enjoyment at the Baths 133 ‘Smilingly You Have Watered the Land’: The Nile at Sepphoris 135 Good Fortune at Kos 138 CHAPTER FOUR: THE POWER OF WORDS: INSCRIPTIONS 145 Beneficial Powers at Kourion 146 ‘The Ghastly Example of the Perishing Envious’ 151 From Explicit to Implicit: The Christianisation of Supernatural Inscriptions 156 Literal and Rhetoric Interpretations 161 CONCLUSION 166 APPENDIX 174 BIBLIOGRAPHY Primary Sources 188 Dictionaries and Lexicons 193 Secondary Sources 194 Volume 2 ILLUSTRATIONS 226 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). I thank them for their generosity and for placing faith in me; this project would not have been possible without them. With all my heart I thank my supervisor (and idol) Liz James, who patiently guided me through the past three years with wit, generosity, structure and kindness. I could not have wished for a better supervisor. I thank her for the ‘so whats?’ and for telling me to ‘get on with it’ when I should have been getting on with it. I owe a great amount of gratitude to friends, peers and faculty at the University of Sussex. My second supervisor, Flora Dennis, always made herself available for support and advice, most memorably on a particularly bad afternoon. Stephen Wharton kindly read drafts, offered advice and assurance. Rebecca Raynor and Wendy Watson were key PhD role models. Their feedback, friendship and assistance mean more than they will ever realise. I also owe a great deal of thanks to Michelle O’Malley, Francesco Ventrella, Maurice Howard, Simon Lane and Bente Bjørnholt, who have provided vital input along the way. I also thank several of the philosophy and SPT doctoral students, many of whom I shared an office with, in particular Elaine O’Connell, Jacob Berkson, Jana Elsen and Patrick Simon Moffett Levy. This thesis would not have been written without my two great friends Sally Johnson and Mike Davy. They have practically endured the PhD process with me. If it were not for their friendship, kindness, time and constructive criticism, this thesis would have been in a worse state. A ‘thank you’ cannot even get close to conveying my appreciation to them. I look forward to returning their generosity in whatever way I can. I am grateful to the Warburg Institute, the Institute of Classical Studies, the British Library and the National Art Library, all of whom kindly allowed me to use their invaluable libraries and resources. I also thank the library at the University of Sussex, especially William Teague in the interlibrary loan department who had to deal with what must have seemed an endless supply of requests. I thank Hazel Johannessen for teaching me ancient Greek and Fiona Haarer for providing me with a travel grant for that course. I also thank Carole Cox, Marilyn Chapman, Katherine Hegarty, James Clark and Jo Stoner. Lastly, I could not leave out my gratitude to my four-legged canine friend Shelley, whose love and affection carried me through many of the challenges of the thesis. I thank all of those that made the imperfections in this thesis less imperfect. Faults in this thesis are not a reflection on them; any faults are mine and mine alone. 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Betz Hans Dieter Betz (ed.), The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation: Including the Demotic Spells, 2nd edn (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992). DOP Dumbarton Oaks Papers Mommsen CT Theodosiani libri XVI, ed. Theodor Mommsen and Paul M. Meyer, Vol. 1 (Berlin: Apud Weidmannos, 1954). MRNA Katherine M. D. Dunbabin, The Mosaics of Roman North Africa: Studies in Iconography and Patronage (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978). PDM Papyri demotica magicae PG Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Graeca, ed. by Jacques- Paul Migne (Paris, 1857-66). PGM Papyri graecae magicae Pharr CT Clyde Pharr (ed.), The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1952). PL Patrologiae Cursus Completus Series Latina, ed. by Jacques-Paul Migne (Paris, 1844-55). Preisendanz Karl Preisendanz (ed.), Papyri graecae magicae: Die griechischen Zauberpapyri, 2 vols (Stuttgart: Verlag B. G. Teubner, 1974). 8 LIST OF MAPS Map 1. Map detailing the locations of the floor mosaics discussed in the thesis. Source: author. Map 2. Map detailing the mosaics that come from the Middle East area in the thesis. Source: author. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Floor mosaic at the church of St George, Adeitha. Jordan. Date 637. Source: Michele Piccirillo, The Mosaics of Jordan, ed. by Patricia M. Bikai and Thomas A. Dailey (Amman: American Center of Oriental Research, 1992), p. 306. Figure 2. Line drawing of the plan of the church of St George at Adeitha. Source: Michele Piccirillo, The Mosaics of Jordan, ed. by Patricia M. Bikai and Thomas A. Dailey (Amman: American Center of Oriental Research, 1992), p. 306. Figure 3. Sculpture with the head of a goddess, possibly Aphrodite. First or second century. Marble. Height: 0.40 m. National Archaeological Museum, Athens, Greece (Inventory number: EAM 1762). Image downloaded: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/- ISo9GIUCOCs/UnpqSD4sNZI/AAAAAAAA3Jg/xu6pKOBY9ts/s1600/ 3514-156.jpg [accessed 29 May 2014]. Figure 4. Crosses in the border at the east end of the Martyrium of Babylas outside of Antioch, Turkey (detail). Fourth or early-fifth century. Mosaic. Source: Ernst Kitzinger, ‘The Threshold of the Holy Shrine: Observations on Floor Mosaics at Antioch and Bethlehem’, in Kyriakon: Festschrift Johannes Quasten, Vol. 2, ed. by Patrick Granfield and Josef A. Jungmann (Münster Westf: Aschendorff, 1970), fig. 1. Figure 5. Detail of Solomon’s knot. Source: author. Figure 6. A Herakles knot on a fragment of a Coptic gravestone. Sixth century. Stone relief. Coptic Museum, Cairo, Egypt. Source: Eunice Dauterman Maguire et al., Art and Holy Powers in the Early Christian House (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989), p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Journey in Pictures Through Roman Religion
    A Journey in Pictures through Roman Religion By Ursula Kampmann, © MoneyMuseum What is god? As far as the Romans are concerned we think we know that all too well from our unloved Latin lessons: Jupiter, Juno, Minerva, the Roman Triad as well as the usual gods of the ancient world, the same as the Greek gods in name and effect. In fact, however, the roots of Roman religion lie much earlier, much deeper, in dark, prehistoric times ... 1 von 20 www.sunflower.ch How is god experienced? – In the way nature works A bust of the goddess Flora (= flowering), behind it blossom. A denarius of the Roman mint master C. Clodius Vestalis, 41 BC Roman religion emerged from the magical world of the simple farmer, who was speechless when faced with the miracles of nature. Who gave the seemingly withered trees new blossom after the winter? Which power made the grain of corn in the earth grow up to produce new grain every year? Which god prevented the black rust and ensured that the weather was fine just in time for the harvest? Who guaranteed safe storage? And which power was responsible for making it possible to divide up the corn so that it sufficed until the following year? Each individual procedure in a farmer's life was broken down into many small constituent parts whose success was influenced by a divine power. This divine power had to be invoked by a magic ritual in order to grant its help for the action. Thus as late as the imperial period, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid, Fasti 1.63-294 (Translated By, and Adapted Notes From, A
    Ovid, Fasti 1.63-294 (translated by, and adapted notes from, A. S. Kline) [Latin text; 8 CE] Book I: January 1: Kalends See how Janus1 appears first in my song To announce a happy year for you, Germanicus.2 Two-headed Janus, source of the silently gliding year, The only god who is able to see behind him, Be favourable to the leaders, whose labours win Peace for the fertile earth, peace for the seas: Be favourable to the senate and Roman people, And with a nod unbar the shining temples. A prosperous day dawns: favour our thoughts and speech! Let auspicious words be said on this auspicious day. Let our ears be free of lawsuits then, and banish Mad disputes now: you, malicious tongues, cease wagging! See how the air shines with fragrant fire, And Cilician3 grains crackle on lit hearths! The flame beats brightly on the temple’s gold, And spreads a flickering light on the shrine’s roof. Spotless garments make their way to Tarpeian Heights,4 And the crowd wear the colours of the festival: Now the new rods and axes lead, new purple glows, And the distinctive ivory chair feels fresh weight. Heifers that grazed the grass on Faliscan plains,5 Unbroken to the yoke, bow their necks to the axe. When Jupiter watches the whole world from his hill, Everything that he sees belongs to Rome. Hail, day of joy, and return forever, happier still, Worthy to be cherished by a race that rules the world. But two-formed Janus what god shall I say you are, Since Greece has no divinity to compare with you? Tell me the reason, too, why you alone of all the gods Look both at what’s behind you and what’s in front.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Information: Title: the Realm of Janus: Doorways in the Roman
    Paper Information: Title: The Realm of Janus: Doorways in the Roman World Author: Ardle Mac Mahon Pages: 58–73 DOI: http://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2002_58_73 Publication Date: 03 April 2003 Volume Information: Carr, G., Swift, E., and Weekes, J. (eds.) (2003) TRAC 2002: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Canterbury 2002. Oxford: Oxbow Books. Copyright and Hardcopy Editions: The following paper was originally published in print format by Oxbow Books for TRAC. Hard copy editions of this volume may still be available, and can be purchased direct from Oxbow at http://www.oxbowbooks.com. TRAC has now made this paper available as Open Access through an agreement with the publisher. Copyright remains with TRAC and the individual author(s), and all use or quotation of this paper and/or its contents must be acknowledged. This paper was released in digital Open Access format in April 2013. The Realm of Janus: Doorways in the Roman World Ardle Mac Mahon For the Romans, the doorways into their dwellings had tremendous symbolic and spiritual significance and this aspect was enshrined around the uniquely Latin god Janus. The importance of principal entrance doorways was made obvious by the architectural embell ishments used to decorate doors and door surrounds that helped to create an atmosphere of sacred and ritual eminence. The threshold was not only an area of physical transition but also of symbolic change intimately connected to the lives of the inhabitants of the dwelling. This paper will explore the meaning of the architectural symbolism of the portal and the role of doorways in ritual within the Roman empire by an examination of the architectural remains and the literary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Chapter 11: the Roman Republic
    Name Class Date FORMAL Chapter 11: The Roman Republic ASSESSMENT UNIT 4 CHAPTER TEST B Part 1: Multiple CHoice Choose the best answer for each question from the choices available. 1 Where is the city of Rome located? 7 What statement describes the life of the A east of the Apennines on the Italian Peninsula aristocracy? B on the island of Sicily A They lived and worked on small farms. C in the Alps in northern Italy B They owned most of the land and dominated the government. D on the west coast of the Italian Peninsula C They worked at manual labor for very low wages. 2 According to legend, who founded the city D They were craftspeople, teachers, and doctors. of Rome? A Roman gods 8 Which human qualities were important to the ancient Romans? B Romulus and Remus A beauty, grace, elegance C Aeneas and the Etruscans B curiosity, intelligence, imagination D Cicero and Cincinnatus C discipline, strength, loyalty 3 Which of the following did the Greeks introduce D honesty, humor, helpfulness to the early Romans? A the long epic poem 9 What was the legion in ancient Rome? B the grid system for city streets A a group of loyal Senators C stone houses B a group of well-trained professional soldiers D metalworking C a group of elected plebeians D a group of patriarchs 4 Which of the following was NOT a branch of the Roman government? 10 Who defeated the Roman army at Cannae during A executive the Second Punic War? B judicial A Scipio C patrician B Philip V D legislative C Marius D Hannibal 5 What was one result of the plebeian strike in 494 b.c.? A The plebeians were allowed to elect their own representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Magic in Private and Public Lives of the Ancient Romans
    COLLECTANEA PHILOLOGICA XXIII, 2020: 53–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.04 Idaliana KACZOR Uniwersytet Łódzki MAGIC IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LIVES OF THE ANCIENT ROMANS The Romans practiced magic in their private and public life. Besides magical practices against the property and lives of people, the Romans also used generally known and used protective and healing magic. Sometimes magical practices were used in official religious ceremonies for the safety of the civil and sacral community of the Romans. Keywords: ancient magic practice, homeopathic magic, black magic, ancient Roman religion, Roman religious festivals MAGIE IM PRIVATEN UND ÖFFENTLICHEN LEBEN DER ALTEN RÖMER Die Römer praktizierten Magie in ihrem privaten und öffentlichen Leben. Neben magische Praktik- en gegen das Eigentum und das Leben von Menschen, verwendeten die Römer auch allgemein bekannte und verwendete Schutz- und Heilmagie. Manchmal wurden magische Praktiken in offiziellen religiösen Zeremonien zur Sicherheit der bürgerlichen und sakralen Gemeinschaft der Römer angewendet. Schlüsselwörter: alte magische Praxis, homöopathische Magie, schwarze Magie, alte römi- sche Religion, Römische religiöse Feste Magic, despite our sustained efforts at defining this term, remains a slippery and obscure concept. It is uncertain how magic has been understood and practised in differ- ent cultural contexts and what the difference is (if any) between magical and religious praxis. Similarly, no satisfactory and all-encompassing definition of ‘magic’ exists. It appears that no singular concept of ‘magic’ has ever existed: instead, this polyvalent notion emerged at the crossroads of local custom, religious praxis, superstition, and politics of the day. Individual scholars of magic, positioning themselves as ostensi- bly objective observers (an etic perspective), mostly defined magic in opposition to religion and overemphasised intercultural parallels over differences1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complexity of Roman Suicide Carmine Anthony Ruff
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 1974 The complexity of Roman suicide Carmine Anthony Ruff Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Ruff, Carmine Anthony, "The ompc lexity of Roman suicide" (1974). Master's Theses. Paper 937. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE COMPLEXITY OF ROMAN SUICIDE BY CARMINE ANTHONY RUFFA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN CLASSICAL STUDIES MAY 1974 APPROVAL SHEET ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE • . • • . .iv Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . • . • • • • . • • • • • . • 1 II. ANCIENT SUICIDE: A PROBLEM OF SEMANTICS. • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 Latin Citations to Suicide The Absence of A Standard Word Or Phrase III. PHILOSOPHIC SUICIDE . • .11 The Attitude of the Latin Philosophers Toward Suicide The Divergent Views of the Stoic Philosophers The Effect of Cato's Suicide on Stoicism IV. THE TREATMENT OF LUCRETIA'S SUICIDE BY LIVY AND AUGUSTINE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 4 Section I: Livy's Lucretia Section II: Augustine's Denunciation of Lucretia v. SUICIDE IN THE AENEID • • • • • • . .61 Vergii's Development of Dido's Suicidal Personality The Condemnation of Suicides in the Underworld Amata's Suicide CONCLUSION. .80 APPENDIX I • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 83 APPENDIX II • . .86 BIBLIOGRAPHY . .91 VITA . .99 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to acknowledge two people who have influenced and inspired his academic and professional life.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnlydus-4-01-January – Final
    JANUARY [63] 1. I have spoken sufficiently about the fact that the month of January was defined as the beginning of the priestly calendar by King Numa; in it, they would offer sacrifice to the [beings] above the moon, just as in February [they would offer sacrifice] to the [beings] below it. And so, I must speak about Janus—who he is and what idea of him the ancients had. Now then, Labeo says1 that he is called Janus Consivius, that is, "of the council / Senate" [boulaios]; Janus Cenulus and Cibullius, that is, "pertaining to feasting"—for the Romans called food cibus; Patricius, that is, "indigenous"; Clusivius, meaning "pertaining to journeys" [hodiaios]; Junonius, that is, "aerial"; Quirinus, meaning "champion / fighter in the front"; Patulcius and Clusius, that is, "of the door"; Curiatius, as "overseer of nobles"—for Curiatius and Horatius are names of [Roman] nobility. And some relate that he is double in form [64], at one time holding keys in his right hand like a door-keeper, at other times counting out 300 counters in his right hand and 65 in the other, just like [the number of days in] the year. From this,2 he is also [said to be] quadruple in form, from the four "turns" [i.e., the solstices and equinoxes]—and a statue of him of this type is said to be preserved even now in the Forum of Nerva.3 But Longinus vehemently tries to interpret him as Aeonarius, as being the father of Aeon, or that [he got his name because] the Greeks called the year4 enos, as Callimachus in the first book of the Aetia writes: Four-year-old [tetraenon] child of Damasus, Telestorides5..
    [Show full text]
  • Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire
    University of Adelaide Discipline of Classics Faculty of Arts Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire Tammy DI-Giusto BA (Hons), Grad Dip Ed, Grad Cert Ed Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy October 2015 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................... 4 Thesis Declaration ................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 Context and introductory background ................................................................. 7 Significance ......................................................................................................... 8 Theoretical framework and methods ................................................................... 9 Research questions ............................................................................................. 11 Aims ................................................................................................................... 11 Literature review ................................................................................................ 11 Outline of chapters ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Statue of Janus Geminus and the Gates of War
    The Hands of the Double God: The Statue of Janus Geminus and the Gates of War The bronze gates attached to the shrine of Janus Geminus in the Roman forum are well known, and many explanations have been proposed to explain the origin of the counter-intuitive tradition of closing the gates during peacetime and opening them during war. This project seeks to turn attention to another, less studied component of the cult: the bronze statue of Janus behind the gates. It is my intention to demonstrate that it was replaced at some point, almost certainly by Augustus. Ovid (Fasti 1.99) claims that Janus held a staff in his right hand and a key in his left. Pliny (Natural History 34.16.33; cf. Macrobius 1.9.10), on the other hand, claims that Janus was depicted with his fingers shaped so as to indicate the 365 days of the year. How exactly the statue’s fingers indicated the number 35 has been a matter of uncertainty; one recurrent explanation is that the statues fingers were contorted so as to suggest the letters of the Roman numerals for 365: the letters c, l, x, and v. In fact, no such grotesque explanation is necessary. The Romans possessed a tabulation system that used the fingers of both hands to count. The fullest account is preserved by the Venerable Bede in De Temporum Ratione. According to Bede, one would indicate the number 300 with the right hand; one would indicate 65 with the left hand; that this is what Pliny intends for us to understand has the position of Janus’ fingers is confirmed by John Lydus (1.4), who explicitly states that Janus indicated 300 with his right hand and 65 with his left hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome
    HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY Ancient Julius Caesar Rome Reader Caesar Augustus The Second Punic War Cleopatra THIS BOOK IS THE PROPERTY OF: STATE Book No. PROVINCE Enter information COUNTY in spaces to the left as PARISH instructed. SCHOOL DISTRICT OTHER CONDITION Year ISSUED TO Used ISSUED RETURNED PUPILS to whom this textbook is issued must not write on any page or mark any part of it in any way, consumable textbooks excepted. 1. Teachers should see that the pupil’s name is clearly written in ink in the spaces above in every book issued. 2. The following terms should be used in recording the condition of the book: New; Good; Fair; Poor; Bad. Ancient Rome Reader Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to Remix—to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation (www.coreknowledge.org) made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial—You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Companion to Age of Constantine.Pdf
    The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine offers students a com- prehensive one-volume introduction to this pivotal emperor and his times. Richly illustrated and designed as a readable survey accessible to all audiences, it also achieves a level of scholarly sophistication and a freshness of interpretation that will be welcomed by the experts. The volume is divided into five sections that examine political history, reli- gion, social and economic history, art, and foreign relations during the reign of Constantine, a ruler who gains in importance because he steered the Roman Empire on a course parallel with his own personal develop- ment. Each chapter examines the intimate interplay between emperor and empire and between a powerful personality and his world. Collec- tively, the chapters show how both were mutually affected in ways that shaped the world of late antiquity and even affect our own world today. Noel Lenski is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Colorado, Boulder. A specialist in the history of late antiquity, he is the author of numerous articles on military, political, cultural, and social history and the monograph Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century ad. Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 The Cambridge Companion to THE AGE OF CONSTANTINE S Edited by Noel Lenski University of Colorado Cambridge Collections Online © Cambridge University Press, 2007 cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521818384 c Cambridge University Press 2006 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]