Data Hub: Best Practices Review CITY FUTURES RESEARCH CENTRE, UNSW SYDNEY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Data Hub: Best Practices Review CITY FUTURES RESEARCH CENTRE, UNSW SYDNEY Data Hub: Best Practices Review CITY FUTURES RESEARCH CENTRE, UNSW SYDNEY UNIVERSITY PARTNERS Contents INTRODUCTION 4 METHODS 7 Framework 7 Literature search 11 BEST PRACTICE SUMMARY 11 THE BEST PRACTICES 13 People and culture 13 1. Establish an organisational strategy to implement a knowledge management system 13 2. Provide support for training and upskilling 13 3. Engage with internal staff and wider community to establish trust 13 4. Address leadership: establish information governance 14 Process 15 5. Conduct and communicate a data inventory 15 6. Establish data agreements 15 7. Publish standards and tools 15 8. Document and publish project information 15 9. Establish protocols addressing security and privacy concerns 16 10. Seek client feedback on the IM system and its implementation 16 Technology 16 11. Adopt open data formats 16 12. Adopt standards for metadata 18 13. Make datasets discoverable via catalogue 20 14. Adopt 5-Star Open Data Scheme 21 15. Publish web services for data visualisation and analysis 21 Page 2 CASE STUDIES 22 1. USA – Roadmap to GeoPortal.gov 22 2. Australian Spatial Data Infrastructure 25 3. New South Wales Government Information Systems 27 4. Western Australia’s Open Data Initiative 30 5. Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network – AURIN 32 6. Australian Healthcare Data Linkage Systems 34 7. City of Greater Geelong 36 8. European Union – INSPIRE 38 9. London Datastore 40 CONCLUSION 42 REFERENCES 43 APPENDIX: ISO/TC211 GEOGRAPHIC STANDARDS 45 Data Hub: Best Practices Review - City Futures Research Centre, UNSW Sydney Page 3 INTRODUCTION In the age of smart cities, governments are investing in the growth of data-driven platforms, services and The last two decades have seen an expansive analytics in order to improve the design, planning, proliferation of spatial data and more recently big management and evaluation of policies and data. This is set to continue with the emergence of projects for sustainable community development. the internet of things (IoT) where there is expected It is in support of this endeavour that agencies like to be more than 50 billion IoT devices by 2020. Data UrbanGrowth NSW need to play a critical role. proliferation and the digitisation of our cities is driving the Smart Cities agenda (Kitchin 2013). In order to achieve the aforementioned smart city goals, governing bodies must exercise organisational The aim of a smart city is to “make better use of will and capacity to harvest intelligence from data public resources, increasing the quality of the services and to translate this resource into policy formation offered to citizens, while reducing the operational and delivery, and new organisations of government. costs of the public administrations” (Zanella et al Effective data and information management (IM) is 2014). The goals for smart cities are articulated integral to this exercise, and perhaps the keystone to further by Batty et al (2012 p.481): governance in the digital age. • Develop new understanding of urban problems It is useful to apply Lee’s (1988) definition of Information Resource Management to describe the • Develop effective and feasible ways to coordinate collection of activities and assets that comprise IM urban technologies at an organisational level: • Set models and methods for using urban data [It] is the planning, organising, controlling, across spatial and temporal scales securing, and integrating of the organisation’s information resources, including; internal and • Develop new technologies for communication external information; software; hardware; and dissemination facilities; information systems budget; and information systems policies, procedures and • New forms of urban governance and organisation methods. • Define critical problems related to cities, transport, energy With the addition of information communication and dissemination to relevant external parties, • Identify risk, uncertainty and hazards in the this definition captures the various aspects of IM smart city relevant to the scale and operation of agencies like UrbanGrowth NSW. Page 4 Purpose of Review a project that supports UrbanGrowth NSW’s City The business of establishing an IM system can be Transformation Lifecycle agenda by establishing a a challenge considering the variety of information clear understanding of the digital ecosystem and assets and data formats, and the practical and legal user requirements needed to inform future forward conditions under which they may be acquired, shared, investment in data delivery services. analysed, re-distributed and communicated. It requires The Connected City Data Hub Scoping Study an orchestration of the organisation’s assets (e.g. ICT and Roadmap is a collaborative project between resources, personnel capacity and know-how, budget, UrbanGrowth NSW, University of New South Wales, and facilities) and operational procedures and policies. University of Western Sydney, and University of This review is a complementary activity to the Wollongong. The following diagram contextualises the Connected City Data Hub Scoping Study and Roadmap, project in relation to the components of UrbanGrowth’s City Transformation Lifecycle initiative. Figure 1: Context of the UrbanGrowth Data Hub in UrbanGrowth’s City Transformation Lifecycle initiative Infrastructure Data NSW Analytics Centre Industry Greater Sydney Commission University of NSW Urban Growth NSW Western Sydney University Data University of City Transformation Wollongong Visualisation Mapping Data Hub University of Technology Mapping Sydney Thinking Cities University of Newcastle Funding University CIties of Sydney Macquarie University Building Cities Living Cities City Data Hub seeks to review existing datasets The diagram below maps a vision for an IM system against UrbanGrowth’s information management to support UrbanGrowth’s operations. The map needs and assist in identifying where data agreements summarises the components and functions of an and partnerships with custodians may be beneficial IM enterprise. for UrbanGrowth. Data Hub: Best Practices Review - City Futures Research Centre, UNSW Sydney Page 5 Portfolio Projects CoP filesharing news publications Collaboration Social media Information Knowledge brokers standards Brokering City Transformation Data Hub metadata Body of Data Knowledge Open Restricted Visualisation Analytics Virtual Reality Mapping 3D City Dashboards Figure 2: Components of UrbanGrowth’s information management vision This review will present case studies of IM system The next section provides a description of the implementations deployed internationally and within framework and method used to produce this review. Australia. It seeks to summarise best practices in This is followed by a summary of best practices, and information and data governance that would be case studies that exemplify such practices in their IM applicable to UrbanGrowth NSW. implementations. Page 6 METHODS 3. Technology This dimension addresses requirement of ICT Framework instrumentation to be able to collect spatial data, as well as the integration of data and Dimensions of Information Management system implementation metadata formats, and collaborative platforms/ The review categorises activities related to the software. The technology used to store, implementation of IM systems into three dimensions: catalogue and make data accessible must allow People/Culture, Process and Technology. This for the data asset’s interoperability between categorisation is adopted as a summary of the different platforms, across different agencies IM facets discussed in literature concerning the and perhaps even across different time periods. integration of ICT into an organisation’s business and The system architecture must be able to provide operations (Weippert & Kajewski 2004; Cabrera et al contingencies for making existing data accessible 2001; Gold et al 2001):be transformative, as can be and usable by other existing systems and other seen in the table below. potential uses of the data in the future, as well as have mechanisms to allow the integration of data 1. People/Culture from various sources and accommodation for new types of data. This dimension addresses the ‘human capital’ part of IM; it includes the technical skills and Capability Maturity Model competencies required, the fostering of good data The review will apply the capability maturity model management habits and sense of responsibility in recommending the order of best practices to for data, and the provision of incentives for such apply. This kind of framework has been used behaviour; as well as presence of a collaborative by businesses in the IT industry to assess their culture at work to promote knowledge transfer. organisational performance, as well as in other project Komninos (2011) describes this aspect of IM management contexts. The authors believe that this as the dimension where ‘amplification’ can kind of open-ended framework may be advantageous take place; where mechanisms are put in place for organisations that are seeking a roadmap to to ensure that members of the enterprise incrementally optimise their IM program. or community that run, support and use the Given that the urban data landscape is subject knowledge infrastructure have the skills or can to disruption in digital delivery services and that upskill to be able to contribute and co-create enterprises face risks associated with digital information—thereby amplifying the capabilities obsolescence—an open-ended framework that of the information and data infrastructure.
Recommended publications
  • NSW Government Action Plan: a Ten Point Commitment
    NSW Government Action Plan A ten point commitment to the construction sector June 2018 A TEN POINT COMMITMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR 1 PURPOSE This statement has been developed by the NSW Government’s Construction Leadership Group (CLG) and is endorsed by its member agencies1, all of whom are engaged in the delivery of a large long term pipeline of infrastructure investment on behalf of the NSW Government. The CLG member agencies recognise that This Action Plan covers all Government-procured the NSW Government can only achieve its construction and is designed to: infrastructure objectives in partnership with the » Encourage an increase in the “supply side” private sector, and that this depends on healthy capacity of the sector to meet future demand. ongoing competition between a capable field » Reduce industry’s costs and “down-time” by of construction firms, sub-contractors and the making Government procurement processes industry supply chain – not just now, but for more efficient. years to come. » Develop the skills, capability and capacity of They have therefore jointly committed to a range the construction industry’s workforce. of steps to help improve the capability and » Encourage culture change and greater capacity of the construction sector. diversity in the construction sector and its suppliers. The NSW Government is committed to achieving value for money in construction procurement. » Foster partnership and collaboration between But value for money does not mean obtaining the public and private sectors to drive the lowest price for every project. Rather, it is innovation in the NSW construction sector. about adopting a broader, longer term view about the need to drive quality, innovation and cost effectiveness by fostering a thriving and sustainable construction sector in NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydneymeets East Londonnorth & South of the Thames
    Western Sydney meets East London North & South of the Thames Steering Committee and delegate bios W: westernsydney.org.au | A: PO Box 3201 North Parramatta NSW 1750 Australia September 2019 | Page 1 Western Sydney meets East London North & South of the Thames Study tour Steering Committee - bios Christopher Brown AM Chairman and Founder, Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue Christopher retired as Pro Chancellor of Western Sydney University after eight years as a Trustee and Director, in mid-2019. He continues to serve on the boards of the Western Sydney University Academy and External Affairs Committee. Having served on dozens of government boards over 30 years, he was a member of the Federal/State commission that chose the Badgerys Creek Airport site and then devised an advocacy campaign to secure Cabinet support. He served on the NSW Transport & Planning Blueprint Panel that first recognised Parramatta as Sydney’s second CBD and advises News Corp’s ‘Go West/Project Sydney’ editorial campaign. Christopher chaired the WestLine Partnership, which secured a light rail connection in the Olympic Corridor, and the Western Sydney Rail Alliance, which secured $5+ billion to build north/south rail connections to Badgerys Creek. He was founding Convenor of the Parramatta Partnership Forum and the Committee for Liverpool, and now manages the Canterbury-Bankstown Forum and Advance Blacktown civic leadership forums. He chairs the South Western Sydney Local Health Advisory Board and served as an adviser to the Western Sydney Parklands. Raised and educated in Parramatta, he was awarded Australian Honours for services to industry and community in 2014. Leanne Bloch-Jorgensen Head of Thought Leadership and Insights, Corporate and Institutional Bank, National Australia Bank Leanne has spent more than 25 years in the banking and finance sector, having held a variety of strategic and transactional roles in both major domestic and boutique investment banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft South District Plan
    Draft South District Plan co-creating a greater sydney November 2016 How to be involved This draft District Plan sets You can read the entire Before making a submission, out aspirations and proposals draft District Plan at please read our privacy for Greater Sydney’s South www.greater.sydney and send statement at District, which includes the feedback: www.greater.sydney/privacy local government areas of • via www.greater.sydney For more information Canterbury-Bankstown, visit www.greater.sydney Georges River and Sutherland. • by email: call us on 1800 617 681 It has been developed by the [email protected] Greater Sydney Commission. • by post: or email: Greater Sydney Commission [email protected] This draft District Plan is on Draft South District Plan formal public exhibition until PO Box 257, the end of March 2017, and will Parramatta NSW 2124 be finalised towards the end of 2017 to allow as many people as possible to provide input. This document was updated on 21 December 2016 to address typographical errors and production faults. A detailed list of the errata can be found at www.greater.sydney/content/publications Draft South District Plan Exhibition THIS SEPARATE DOCUMENT DOCUMENT Overview Draft District Maps Background Website Plan Material Dashboard Our vision — Towards our Greater Sydney 2056 Summary The requirements A compilation of Data and Reports How the A draft brochure of the legislative maps and spatial used to inform the draft District Plan is amendment to of the draft framework information used draft District Plan to be monitored update A Plan for District Plan to inform the draft Growing Sydney District Plan You can view these supporting components, as well as Our vision — Towards our Greater Sydney 2056, SOUTH DISTRICT our proposed 40-year vision for Greater Sydney, at www.greater.sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Adding to the Dividend, Ending the Divide #3
    ADDING TO THE DIVIDEND, ENDING THE DIVIDE #3 ISSUES PAPER 14 | JANUARY 2017 CONTENTS OVERVIEW 4 A CITY OF 8M IN 2056: BUSINESS AS USUAL WON’T DO 4 ADDING TO THE SYDNEY DIVIDEND 5 ENDING THE DIVIDE IN A REBALANCED SYDNEY 6 SYDNEY AND THE NEW NATIONAL NARRATIVE ON CITIES 7 PART 1: ADDING TO THE DIVIDEND 8 THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF SYDNEY 8 SYDNEY’S MOMENTUM CONTINUES 11 SYDNEY STANDS OUT – AND HAS COME A LONG WAY SINCE 2012/13 11 PART 2: ENDING THE DIVIDE 12 WESTERN SYDNEY ON THE MOVE…. 12 BUT THE JOBS GAP REMAINS 12 MEASURING SYDNEY’S DIVIDE WITH EFFECTIVE JOB DENSITY 14 GROSS VALUE ADDED 15 LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY 16 INCOME DIVIDE 17 EDUCATION DIVIDE 17 HEALTH DIVIDE 18 KEEP ON KEEPING ON … 19 PART 3: KEY CITY TRENDS 20 COMPACT SYDNEY AND SPRAWLED SYDNEY 20 THE RE-URBANISATION OF THE ECONOMY AND THE RISE OF INNOVATION DISTRICTS 21 PART 4: A DUAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE TWO SYDNEYS 22 OUTCOMES TO ADDRESS THE DIVIDE 23 INNOVATION DISTRICTS 23 A MORE WALKABLE SYDNEY IS AN ECONOMIC STRATEGY 23 A MORE WALKABLE SYDNEY IS A HEALTH STRATEGY 24 MODAL SHIFT TO COUNTERACT SPRAWL AND SPATIAL INEQUITY 26 POOR MOBILITY MEANS POOR SOCIAL MOBILITY 27 EXPAND THE RAIL NETWORK 28 INCREASING EFFECTIVE JOB DENSITY 30 THE ‘30-MINUTE SYDNEY’: FROM MOBILITY TO ACCESSIBILITY 30 TOWN-CENTRE RENEWAL AND THE BENEFITS OF ‘DENSITY DONE WELL’ 32 POLICY INITATIVES TO REDUCE THE DIVIDE 33 THE VERTICAL FISCAL IMBALANCE 33 LEARNING FROM THE US? 33 ENTER THE CITY DEAL 33 CITY DEALS AND CITY SHAPING INFRASTRUCTURE 34 VALUE CAPTURE, USER CHARGES AND FUNDING ‘CITY FOLLOWING’ INFRASTRUCTURE 35 CITY GOVERNANCE 36 CONCLUSION 37 2 COMMITTEE FOR SYDNEY TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX Q STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT Aurecon
    POWERHOUSE PARRAMATTA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX Q STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT Aurecon Powerhouse Parramatta Consultation Summary Report Infrastructure NSW May 2020 Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Project status ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Project overview .................................................................................................................................... 4 Project benefits ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Consultation ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Pre-EIS Consultation approach ...................................................................................................................... 6 Communication and engagement objectives ........................................................................................ 6 Engagement framework ........................................................................................................................ 6 Stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Sydney Commission Annual Report 2018-19.Pdf
    Annual Report 2018/19 Greater Sydney Commission Annual Report 2018/19 October 2019 © Crown Copyright 2019 NSW Government ISBN 978-0-6482729-8-4 DISCLAIMER While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of NSW, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. COPYRIGHT NOTICE In keeping with the NSW Government’s commitment to encourage the availability of information, you are welcome to reproduce the material that appears in Greater Sydney Commission – Annual Report 2018/19 for personal, in-house or non-commercial use without formal permission or charge. All other rights reserved. If you wish to reproduce, alter, store or transmit material appearing in this Greater Sydney Commission – Annual Report 2018/19 for any other purpose, request for formal permission should be directed to the details below. Email: [email protected] Address: Level 5, 10 Valentine Ave, Parramatta NSW 2150 Tel: (02) 8289 6200 or 1800 617 681 Business hours: 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday Cover photograph: Victoria Park – Camperdown, Eastern City District 3 Letter to the Premier The Hon. Gladys Berejiklian MP Premier GPO Box 5341 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Dear Premier, We are pleased to submit for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report for the Greater Sydney Commission for the year ended 30 June 2019. This Report has been prepared in accordance with the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984 and the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Regulation 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for NSW Asset Management Framework Page 2 of 54 Transport for NSW
    Transport for NSW: Asset Management Framework (Submitted as the Transport Cluster Strategic Asset and Services Plan) February 2021 (Final v3.0) Transport for NSW Document history and approval Document history Title: Asset Management Framework (submitted as the Transport Strategic Asset and Services Plan) Document Number: A9117267 Author: Andrew Cooper Issue Date Revision description 1.0 May 2020 First version adopted by Executive Committee 2.0 Draft October 2020 Draft version for submission to Treasury 3.0 draft December 2020 Tidy and style conformance. Minor management edit and copy editing done 3.0 Final February 2021 Final version for submission to Treasury Document approval Endorsed by: Name Signature Date Deputy Secretary Safety, Tara McCarthy 10/02/2021 Environment and Regulation Approved by: Name Signature Date Secretary Rodd Staples 12.02.2021 Copyright: Transport for NSW (2021). 231 Elizabeth Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000. Transport for NSW Asset Management Framework Page 2 of 54 Transport for NSW Table of contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................ 5 1.2 Using this document ........................................................................... 6 2. Asset Management Framework ..................................................................... 8 2.1 Customers & Stakeholders ................................................................. 9 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Document Title
    Transport for NSW Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide This guide applies to all agencies within the NSW Transport cluster Evaluation & Assurance Group Finance & Investment Corporate Services 2019 | Version: 2.0 Foreword Customers are at the centre of everything we do at Transport for NSW (TfNSW). We’re delivering the largest transport infrastructure program this nation has ever seen − $55.6 billion of investment over four years to 2022-23 for game-changing projects like Sydney Metro, light rail, motorways and road upgrades.1 The investment decisions we make today will deliver benefits to the community for decades to come. When making investments for the people of NSW we need to use an evidence-based approach which considers all costs and benefits. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) does exactly that. It balances a complex set of community considerations against limited resources and is the government’s key tool for promoting value-for-money decision-making. The Transport for NSW Cost-Benefit Analysis Guide (Guide) sets out the principles, concepts, methodology and procedures to use when conducting CBA for NSW Transport cluster initiatives. Importantly, the Guide steps through a robust framework for decision-making, as well as how to organise and present the evidence that supports them. It is supported by a suite of products including user-friendly models and recommended economic parameter values. The Guide aligns project evaluation to Future Transport Strategy 2056 outcomes, promoting their consideration from project conception. The use of this guide is encouraged to ensure we consistently put value-for-money and outcomes for the community at the centre of our expenditure decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Electorates for Women's Council Elections - 2019
    ELECTORATES FOR WOMEN'S COUNCIL ELECTIONS - 2019 ELECTORATE 1 - HIGHER EDUCATION (2 delegates) AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY TAFE NSW UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY OF NSW UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ELECTORATE 2 – DISABILITY SERVICES (1 delegate) ACHIEVE AUSTRALIA ARUMA (formerly HWNS) AUSTRALIAN UNITY CEREBRAL PALSY ALLIANCE DISABILITY SERVICES AUSTRALIA HUNTER VALLEY DISABILITY LIFE WITHOUT BARRIERS LIVE BETTER MID NORTH COAST NORTHCOTT THE BENEVOLENT SOCIETY THE DISABILITY TRUST ELECTORATE 3 – OTHER NATIONAL SYSTEMS (1 delegate) ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL NSW AGL MACQUARIE AUSGRID COAL SERVICES PTY LTD CORRECTIVE SERVICES – MTC BROADSPECTRUM DELTA ELECTRICITY EMPLOYED SOLICITORS ENERGY AUSTRALIA NSW ERARING (ORIGIN) FORESTRY CORPORATION FSS TRUSTEE CORPORATION GREYHOUND RACING HARNESS RACING AUTHORITY LAND REGISTRY SERVICES MERCER ADMINISTRATION SERVICES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD. MURRAY IRRIGATION MURRUMBIDGEE IRRIGATION LTD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART NATIONAL ART SCHOOL NATIONAL HEAVY VEHICLE REGULATOR NIDA PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TRANSGRID UNIVERSITIES ADMISSIONS CENTRE WATERNSW ELECTORATE 4 – STRONGER COMMUNITIES – FACS and HEALTH (2 delegates) CHILDREN’S GUARDIAN, OFFICE of the COMMUNITY SERVICES FACS – DISABILITY FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES (CENTRAL OFFICE), DEPT. OF (including Corporate Services, Business HOUSING NSW MULTICULTURAL
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Draft Glenfield Place Strategy …
    Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Draft Glenfield Place Strategy …. December 2020 NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environmentwww.dpie.nsw.gov.au | dpie.nsw.gov.au Draft Glenfield Place Strategy Acknowledgement of Country NSW Department of Planning Industry and Environment acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the land, the Tharawal people, and pays respect to all Elders past, present and emerging. Published by NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment dpie.nsw.gov.au Title: Draft Glenfield Place Strategy …. First published: December 2020 © State of New South Wales through Department of Planning, Industry and Environment 2020. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment as the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to charge others for access to the publication (other than at cost); include the publication in advertising or a product for sale; modify the publication; or republish the publication on a website. You may freely link to the publication on a departmental website. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (December 2020) and may not be accurate, current or complete. The State of New South Wales (including the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment), the author and the publisher take no responsibility, and will accept no liability, for the accuracy, currency, reliability or correctness of any information included in the document (including material provided by third parties). Readers should make their own inquiries and rely on their own advice when making decisions related to material contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions for a Greater Sydney 2017-2056
    Directions for a Greater Sydney 2017-2056 Directions for a Greater Sydney is the approach produced by the Greater Sydney Commission to better integrate land use and infrastructure to deliver a more productive, liveable and sustainable Greater Sydney to 2056. The Greater Sydney Commission has produced Directions for a Greater Sydney in collaboration with the following agencies to better integrate land use and infrastructure to deliver a more productive, liveable and sustainable Greater Sydney to 2056: Department of Premier and Cabinet NSW Treasury Transport for NSW Department of Planning and Environment NSW Health Department of Education Department of Family and Community Services Department of Industry Infrastructure NSW UrbanGrowth NSW 2 Message from the Chief Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer On behalf of the Commissioners and staff of the Greater response. At the Commission, we see that people are Sydney Commission, we acknowledge the traditional the heart of a city and changes to our city must bring owners, past and present, of the lands that include genuine improvements to its productivity, liveability and Greater Sydney. sustainability with tangible benefits to people. We are proud to present this important and We have been given a clear message through our unprecedented milestone document which will form the engagement that Greater Sydney’s stakeholders want foundation for the future planning of Greater Sydney. to see the region’s growth matched with strategically Directions for a Greater Sydney establishes the planned investments, projects and priorities. That is why aspirations for our city over the next 40 years and Directions for a Greater Sydney will be reflected in the has been developed from extensive community and major land use, transport and infrastructure plans being stakeholder engagement in collaboration with the developed in 2017: the Greater Sydney Region Plan, the NSW Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission 41
    NSW Submission Productivity Commission into National Water Reform NSW Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into National Water Reform Introduction NSW remains committed to the principles of the National Water Initiative (NWI) and is progressing a strong program of water reform. This reform program seeks to provide safe, secure and healthy water resources and services to support the growth and development of our regional communities and metropolitan areas while ensuring the protection of our natural environment. The water reforms that NSW is undertaking are consistent with the NWI. NSW notes the scope of the PC’s inquiry aims to avoid duplication with the 2018 inquiry into the effectiveness of the implementation of the Basin Plan and the ACCC Murray–Darling Basin Water Markets inquiry. However, NSW has concerns with the operation of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan and the timeframe for its implementation. In correspondence with the Minister for Resources, Water and Northern Australia, NSW noted that the scope of this inquiry may limit its effectiveness given the strong crossover between the Basin Plan and the NWI. This NSW Submission provides an overview of the key water policies, programs and projects in NSW. Amendments to the NWI and further implementation of the objectives and outcomes of the NWI need to account for the unique context in which we are currently operating. This includes the severe drought conditions affecting nearly of all NSW and much of the country, other extreme conditions caused by climate variability and the Covid-19 pandemic. Drought Despite recent rainfall, NSW continues to experience drought conditions, particularly in the northeast, far west and southeast of the state.
    [Show full text]