DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCE Amendment 10 (Corrigendum) 10 May 2011 The following aircraft type ratings should be used to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. The inclusion of an aircraft type in the licence does not indicate that the aircraft type has been granted a type certificate under the Basic Regulation and its Implementing Rules Regulation 1702/2003, this list is only intended for the maintenance purposes. In order to keep this list current and type ratings consistent, such information should be first passed on to the Agency at [email protected] in case a Member State needs to issue a type rating that is not included in this list. Notes: Note 1. For aeroplanes in lists 1 and 2, and helicopters in lists 11, 12 and 13, the table of Appendix I include 3 columns: o column 1: TC holder designation o column 2: aircraft model and, when available, the aircraft commercial designation, o column 3: aircraft designation for endorsement on the Part-66 licence. Only the designations in column 3 should be used for endorsing ratings on Part-66 licences. In the tables of the remaining lists 3 to 10 the TC holder designation is added. Note 2. When a modification is introduced by this Decision to an aircraft type rating or to an engine designation in the rating which affect licences already issued, the ratings on the AML licences may be modified at next renewal or when the licence is re-issued. In the following table, the groups of aircraft are defined as follows: List No. Aircraft: 1 Large aircraft (LA). Aeroplanes with a maximum take-off mass of more than 5700 kg, requiring type training and individual type rating 2 Aeroplanes of 5700 kg and below, requiring type training and individual type rating (A-tr) 3 Aeroplanes multiple turbine engines (AMTE) of 5700 kg and below, eligible for type examinations and manufacturer group ratings 4 Aeroplanes single turbine engine (ASTE) of 5700 kg and below, eligible for type examinations and group ratings 5 Aeroplane multiple piston engines – metal structure (AMPE-MS), eligible for type examinations and group ratings 6 Aeroplane single piston engine – metal structure (ASPE-MS), eligible for type examinations and group ratings 7 Aeroplane multiple piston engines – wooden structure (AMPE-WS), eligible for Page 1 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 type examinations and group ratings 8 Aeroplane single piston engine – wooden structure/metal tube-fabric (ASPE- WS), eligible for type examinations and group ratings 9 Aeroplane multiple piston engines – composite structure (AMPE-CS), eligible for type examinations and group ratings 10 Aeroplane single piston engine – composite structure (ASPE-CS), eligible for type examinations and group ratings 11 Multi-engine helicopters (MEH), requiring type training and individual type rating 12 Helicopters – Single turbine engine (HSTE), eligible for type examinations and group ratings 13 Helicopters – Single piston engines (HSPE), eligible for type examinations and group ratings Column 1 includes the TC holder as defined in the TCDS (EASA, FAA or other). For aeroplanes of group 1 and 2 and helicopters, the Column 2 includes the aircraft models as defined in the relevant TCDS (EASA, FAA or other). The following column includes the “commercial designation” when available. Column 3 includes the relevant individual type rating. Only the designations of ratings in column 3 should be used for endorsing individual type ratings on Part-66 licences. Note: aircraft STC data are not included in this table. Changes Corrigendum The subject of the corrigendum of April 2011 in the Annex to the Decision 2010/011/R is to correct the following mistakes: - on page 3, the rating of the Corvette to read SN-601 (PWC JT15D) is corrected; - on page 3, the rating of Airbus A310 (JT9D) which had been erased by mistake is reintroduced; - on page 7 and 8, the ratings of B747 SP are introduced at the right place in the table; - on page 30, the ratings of Aermacchi AL60 were deleted (these ratings were already removed by Decision 2009/016/R); - on page 30, the missing TC holder CESSNA Aircraft Company / Reims Aviation for the Cessna aircraft series is added. Page 2 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 List 1 1. Large aircraft (LA). Aeroplanes with a maximum take-off mass of more than 5700 kg, requiring type training and individual type rating 1. TC holder 2 Aeroplanes Model Commercial 3 Type rating endorsement Designation AIRBUS N 262 A Frégate Nord 262 (Turbomeca Bastan) N 262 B Frégate N 262 C Frégate AIRBUS SN 601 Corvette Aerospatiale SSN-601 (PWC JT15D) Aerospatiale SN-601 (PWC JT15D) A300 B1 Airbus A300 basic model (GE CF6) A300 B2-1A A300 B2-1C A300 B2K-3C A300 B2-202 A300 B2-203 A300 B4-2C A300 B4-102 A300 B4-103 A300 B4-203 A300 C4-203 A300 F4-203 A300 B2-320 Airbus A300 basic model (PW JT9D) A300 B4-120 A300 B4-220 A300 B4-601 Airbus A300-600 (GE CF6) A300 B4-603 A300 B4-605 R A300 F4-605 R A300 C4-605 R Variant F A300 B4-622 Airbus A300-600 (PW 4000) A300 B4-622 R A300 F4-622 R A300 B4-620 Airbus A300-600 (PW JT9D) A300 C4-620 A310-304 Airbus A310 (GE CF6) A310-308 A310-203 A310-221 A310-203 C A310-324 Airbus A310 (PW 4000) A310-325 A310-322 Airbus A310 (PW JT9D) A310-222 Page 3 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 List 1 1. TC holder 2 Aeroplanes Model Commercial 3 Type rating endorsement Designation AIRBUS A310-204 A318-120 series Airbus A318 (PW 6000) A318-110 series Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 (CFM56) A319-110 series A320-111 A320-210 series A321-110 series A321-210 series A319-130 series Airbus A319/A320/A321 (IAE V2500) A320-230 series A321-130 series A321-230 series A330-200 series Airbus A330 (GE CF6) A330-300 series A330-220 series Airbus A330 (PW 4000) A330-320 series A330-240 series Airbus A330 (RR RB 211 Trent A330-340 series 700) A340-210 series Airbus A340 (CFM56) A340-310 series A340-540 series Airbus A340 (RR RB 211 Trent A340-640 series 500) A380-840 series Airbus A380 (RR RB 211 Trent 900) A380-860 series Airbus A380 (EA GP7200) A300F4-608ST Beluga Airbus A300-600ST (GE CF6) AIRBUS One-Eleven 200 series Airbus UK (BAC) 1-11 (RRD Spey) One-Eleven 300 series One-Eleven 400 series One-Eleven 500 series AIRCRAFT L-410 M/UVP Turbolet Let L-410 (Walter M601) INDUSTRIES L-410 UVP-E L-410 UVP-E9 L-410 UVP-E20 Page 4 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 List 1 1. TC holder 2 Aeroplanes Model Commercial 3 Type rating endorsement Designation L-410 UVP-E20 CARGO L-410 UVP-E-LW L-410 UVP-LW L-420 Let L-420 (Walter M601) ALENIA C-27J Alenia C-27 (Allison/RR AE2100) AERONAUTICA ANTONOV AN-26 Antonov AN26 (Ivchenko AI-24) AN-26B ATR-GIE ATR 42-200 ATR 42-200/300 series (PWC Avions de PW120) Transport Régional ATR 42-300 ATR 42-320 ATR 72-101 ATR 72-100/200 series (PWC PW120) ATR 72-102 ATR 72-201 ATR 72-202 ATR 72-211 ATR 72-212 ATR 42-400 ATR 42-400/500/72-212A (PWC PW120) ATR 42-500 42-500 ATR 42-500 42-600 ATR 72-212 A 72-500 ATR 72-212 A 72-600 BAE BAe 146 Series 100 BAe 146/ AVRO 146-RJ (Honeywell SYSTEMS ALF500 Series) BAe 146 Series 200 Page 5 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 List 1 1. TC holder 2 Aeroplanes Model Commercial 3 Type rating endorsement Designation BAe 146 Series 300 AVRO 146-RJ70 AVRO 146-RJ85 AVRO 146-RJ100 AVRO 146-RJ115 HS.748 Series 1 HS748 (RRD Dart) HS.748 Series 2 HS 748 Series 2A HS 748 Series 2B HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1 Jetstream 1 HP.137 (Turbomeca Astazou) HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1 Jetstream 2 Jetstream 200 Jetstream 200 (Turbomeca Astazou) Jetstream 3101 Jetstream 31 Jetstream 31/32 (Honeywell TPE331) Jetstream 3201 Jetstream 32/32EP Jetstream 4100 Jetstream 41 (Honeywell TPE331) Jetstream 4101 BAe ATP ATP (PWC PW120) THE BOEING B707-100 Long Body Boeing 707/720 (PW JT3D) COMPANY B707-100B Long Body B707-100B Short Body B707-300B Series B707-300C Series B720 B720B B707-200 Boeing 707 (PW JT4) B707-200B B707-300 Series B707-400 Series Boeing 707 (RR Conway) B727 Series Boeing 727 (PW JT8D) B727-100 Series Page 6 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 List 1 1. TC holder 2 Aeroplanes Model Commercial 3 Type rating endorsement Designation B727C Series THE BOEING B727-100C Series Boeing 727 (PW JT8D) COMPANY B727-200 Series B737-100 Boeing 737-100/200 (PW JT8D) B737-200 B737-200C B737-300 Boeing 737-300/400/500 (CFM56) B737-400 B737-500 B737-600 Boeing 737-600/700/800/900 (CFM56) B737-700 B737-700C B737-800 B737-900 B737-900ER B747-100B Boeing 747-100 (RR RB211 ) B747-100 Boeing 747-100 (PW JT9D) B747-100B B747-100B SUD B747-200B Boeing 747-200/300 (GE CF6) B747-200C B747-200F B747-300 B747-200B Boeing 747-200/300 (PW JT9D) B747-200F B747-200C B747SP Boeing 747SP (PW Jt9D) B747-300 Boeing 747-200/300 (PW JT9D) B747SP Boeing 747SP (PW JT9D) Page 7 of 43 Annex to ED Decision 2011/003/R 10/05/2011 List 1 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II
    LESSON 3 Significant Aircraft of World War II ORREST LEE “WOODY” VOSLER of Lyndonville, Quick Write New York, was a radio operator and gunner during F World War ll. He was the second enlisted member of the Army Air Forces to receive the Medal of Honor. Staff Sergeant Vosler was assigned to a bomb group Time and time again we read about heroic acts based in England. On 20 December 1943, fl ying on his accomplished by military fourth combat mission over Bremen, Germany, Vosler’s servicemen and women B-17 was hit by anti-aircraft fi re, severely damaging it during wartime. After reading the story about and forcing it out of formation. Staff Sergeant Vosler, name Vosler was severely wounded in his legs and thighs three things he did to help his crew survive, which by a mortar shell exploding in the radio compartment. earned him the Medal With the tail end of the aircraft destroyed and the tail of Honor. gunner wounded in critical condition, Vosler stepped up and manned the guns. Without a man on the rear guns, the aircraft would have been defenseless against German fi ghters attacking from that direction. Learn About While providing cover fi re from the tail gun, Vosler was • the development of struck in the chest and face. Metal shrapnel was lodged bombers during the war into both of his eyes, impairing his vision. Able only to • the development of see indistinct shapes and blurs, Vosler never left his post fi ghters during the war and continued to fi re.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to ED Decision 2013/024/R 10/09/2013
    Annex to ED Decision 2013/024/R 10/09/2013 APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCE The following aircraft type ratings should be used to ensure a common standard throughout the Member States. The inclusion of an aircraft type in the licence does not indicate that the aircraft type has been granted a type certificate under the Basic Regulation and its Implementing Rules, this list is only intended for the maintenance purposes. In order to keep this list current and type ratings consistent, such information should be first passed on to the Agency via contact us in case a Member State needs to issue a type rating that is not included in this list. Notes on when the licences should be modified: When a modification is introduced by this Decision to an aircraft type rating or to an engine designation in the rating which affect licences already issued, the ratings on the AML licences may be modified at next renewal or when the licence is re-issued, unless there is an urgent reason to modify the licence. Notes on aircraft modified by STC: It is not the intention of this document to include all aircraft modified by STCs because a great number of STCs were approved before 2003 and are unknown to the Agency. When an aircraft has been modified by an STC for installation of another engine, the Part-66 type rating of this aircraft may change i.e. from Group 2 to Group 1. This is not reflected in this document. In case the applicant to a licence faces such a case, he/she or his/her competent authority can inform the Agency and a new type rating will be defined by the Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • VA Vol 36 No 10 Oct 2008
    GEOFF ROBISON PRESIDENT, VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATON AirVenture thoughts In my column over the past few 114 ultralights, 131 seaplanes, 40 aero­ 1929 Zenith biplane . .. all three being years you've read my heartfelt at­ batic, and 33 rotorcraft! There were 797 the only flying examples of their type in tempts to offer meaningful descrip­ commercial exhibitors and 2,128 foreign the world. Who can't believe this fairy­ tions about the event we all know visitors from 71 nations; the top three land of make-believe would make Walt as EAA AirVenture Oshkosh. I have nations were Canada with 492, Austra­ Disney blush in disbelief. Harry Houd­ read and enjoyed a number of other lia with 229, and Brazil with 186 (and ini would shrink away in disgrace In the members' writings that have also at­ these are the ones who registered!). There presence ofsuch real magic. And speak­ tempted to share the emotion of this were 37,000 campers and 865 on-site ing of magic, while all of this is unfold­ event. When I read Charlie Harris' media reps (from five different nations)! ing, there Is a guy flying overhead in a offering in the August newsletter of We had more than 500 volunteers in real rocket-powered EZ canard compos­ VAA Chapter 10, it really struck a the Vintage area alone . .. you can just ite! I'm not kidding . .. I couldn't make chord, and I knew right away it was imagine how many volunteers it took this stuffup ifI tried. As I said, you can something that should be shared overall to accomplish this task.
    [Show full text]
  • Raisbeck Performance Systems for Your King
    20142014 RAISBECK PERFORMANCE SYSTEMSRAISBECK FOR PERFORMANCE YOURSYSTEMS KING FOR AIR YOUR LEARJET 31, 35, 36 & 60 Raisbeck’s new Aft Fuselage Locker for the Learjet 60 takes flight. A Message from the CEO Overview of Raisbeck Performance Systems We at Raisbeck Engineering are completing de- velopment and certification of our Lear 60 Aft Fuselage Locker…28 cubic feet of additional baggage space, AND reduced drag at the same time. Certification is scheduled for May 2014, and first production deliveries begin shortly thereafter. We have been working hand-in- hand with Learjet on this program. Over the decades, you and your predeces- James D. Raisbeck, CEO sors have been benefactors of a long line of [email protected] Raisbeck Performance Systems for various ZR LITE Performance System for 30-Series Learjets models of Learjets. The Raisbeck Aft Fuselage Locker for the aisbeck’s ZR LITE Performance Systems provide significantly enhanced performance benefits for In fact, Raisbeck engineers have been de- Learjet 31/35/36 was developed in the mid- RLearjet 31/35/36 models, while providing the highest return on investment available for the veloping systems for the Learjet family since ’90s. More baggage space and less airplane owner and operator. More than 100 Learjet 30 series have now been equipped with Raisbeck’s ZR 1971, and continue drag were the LITE, and the list grows every day. Please contact us if you would like to speak to a satisfied ZR LITE to do so today. This is Raisbeck’s Performance Systems for the results. Learjet Learjet family represents the longest operator and we will provide you with our extensive list of owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudy Arnold Photo Collection
    Rudy Arnold Photo Collection Kristine L. Kaske; revised 2008 by Melissa A. N. Keiser 2003 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: Black and White Negatives....................................................................... 4 Series 2: Color Transparencies.............................................................................. 62 Series 3: Glass Plate Negatives............................................................................ 84 Series : Medium-Format Black-and-White and Color Film, circa 1950-1965.......... 93
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturer Air Safety Investigator Contact List DECEMBER 4, 2019
    Manufacturer Air Safety Investigator Contact List Alphabetical by company name. Air Tractor Major Product Lines AT-402, AT-502, AT-602, AT-802 (+1) 940-564-5616 (Primary) 24-hr Phone Number (+1) 940-447-1331 (Afterhours) Fax Number (+1) 940-564-5612 Contact Person(s) Kyle Schroeder, Aviation Safety Investigator Electronic Contact [email protected] 1524 Leland Snow Way Address Olney, TX 67374 USA Airbus Helicopters Eurocopter, Aerospatiale, Messerschmitt Bolkow Bloehm, SNIAS, Major Product Lines Sud Aviation Helicopters (+1) 214-605-9365 (Primary) 24-hr Phone Number (+1) 972-641-8090 Contact Person(s) Seth Buttner, Manager, Accident Investigation Electronic Contact [email protected] 2701 Forum Dr. Address Grand Prairie, TX 75052 USA AmSafe, Inc. Major Product Lines Aircraft restraints and airbag systems 24-hr Phone Number (+1) 602-850-2850 James Crupi, Business Development & Technical Support Mgr. (+1) 602-628-0349 Contact Person(s) Lee Langston, Aviation Program Manager (+1) 602-628-0336 [email protected] Electronic Contact [email protected] 1043 N. 47th Ave Address Phoenix, AZ 85043 USA DECEMBER 4, 2019 Page 1 of 12 Manufacturer Air Safety Investigator Contact List Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. Major Product Lines Whole-aircraft parachute systems (+1) 763-226-6110 (First Responders) 24-hr Phone Number (+1) 651-457-7491 (Main Line) Fax Number (+1) 651-457-8651 Contact Person(s) Enrique Dillon, President: (+1) (305)777-0174 Direct Line Electronic Contact [email protected] 380 Airport Road Address South St. Paul,
    [Show full text]
  • SSK 0980 Rev 1.Fm
    2b LEARJET 23/24/25, 28/29, 35/36 APPROVEDWHITEIN RT 0980 Revision Transmittal Sheet This page transmits Revision 1 to SSK 0980, “Replacement of Air Conditioning Evaporator Assembly”. Rework: No rework is required for aircraft which have complied with previous issues of this document. Summary: This revision adds clamp part number MS21919WDG20 as an alternate to MS21919DG20, removes the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly from the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kits, and adds the AN919-15D reducer to the 2499002-2 and -010 kits. The kit prices are updated. NOTE: Change bars are placed in the left margin of pages where significant changes are located. This revision incorporates the latest document format for Learjet service instructions. The general arrangement of this document may change from the previous issue. Description of Changes In the Planning Information section: Changed the Material Required information section as follows: Updated the 2499002-1 thru -010 kit pricing. In the Material Information section: Changed the 2499002-1 and -009 kit information as follows: Removed Model 25 aircraft serials that were never built, and removed reference to Model 25F. Changed the 2499002-1, -2, -3, -4, -009, and -010 kit information as follows: Added alternate part number clamp. Changed the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kit information as follows: Moved the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly to the “Other materials/parts necessary” table. Changed the 2499002-2 and -010 kit information as follows: Added the AN919-15D reducer. Filing Instructions: This is a COMPLETE revision. Remove and discard all pages of the prior issue and replace them with pages of Revision 1.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Aircraft Designation Systems
    UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION 1910–1995 451 APPENDIX 5 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. by a number to indicate the individual plane of that In order to fully understand the designations, it is type-manufacturer. Under this system: important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been “A” was used for Curtiss hydroaeroplanes “B” for Wright hydroaeroplanes called upon to perform. Technological changes affect- “C” for Curtiss flying boats ing aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding “D” for Burgess flying boats changes in the operational capabilities and techniques “E” for Curtiss amphibian flying boats employed by the aircraft. Prior to World War I, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. This system had been established in 1911 by Captain In the early period of naval aviation a system was Washington I. Chambers, Director of Naval Aviation. developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different The following is a list of the types of aircraft and their aircraft class designations evolved for the various types designations in existence from 1911–1914: of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Designation System 1911–1914 Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. A-1 Curtiss hydroaeroplane (originally an amphib- While reading this section various references will be ian, and the Navy’s first airplane) made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, A-2 Curtiss landplane (rebuilt as a hydroaeroplane) Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval A-3 Curtiss hydroaeroplane Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model A-4 Curtiss hydroaeroplane Designation of Military Aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • CAR Part II Chapter 7 Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Licensing to (Mainly)
    NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT 2019-01 Issue 01 Date of Issue: 14 April 2019 SUBJECT; CAR PART II CHAPTER 7 – CAR 66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ENGINEER LICENSING REASON; The GCAA has recently conducted a review of (CAR PART II Chapter 7) as a result of a Consultative Committee outcome (OTTG). The review has concluded that, there is a need to amend CAR Part II Chapter 7 Aircraft Maintenance Engineer Licensing to (mainly): 1. Introduce the category L licence for hot air balloons with its associated basic knowledge and training requirements; 2. further clarify on the examination process and basic knowledge/experience requirements for the issue and validity of a CAR 66 licence. 3. Transfer content of Appendix 1 to CAR 66.70 into CAR 66.50 and CAR 66.70 including the applicable AMC and GM; 4. create an appendix to identify limitations added to a CAR 66 licence and further define the reason and applicability for each limitation and the implications. The proposed initial entry into force date of the amendment is 01 August 2019. The layout and paragraph numbering may change through the NPA process; however the content will remain the same. This notice is published to announce to the public this amendment and to entitle all concerned parties to: 1. Review the attached proposed regulation; and 2. Submit their comments online through the GCAA website within 30 days from the date of this NPA. Comments must be submitted through the GCAA Website – E-Publication – Notice of Proposed Amendment, using the Action of “Submit NPA Feedback Request.” Comments and Responses may be viewed in the Comments Response Document CRD pertaining to this NPA on the GCAA website.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Designations and Popular Names
    Chapter 1 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. To fully understand the designations, it is important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been called upon to perform. Technological changes affecting aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding changes in the operational capabilities and techniques employed by the aircraft. Prior to WWI, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. In the early period of naval aviation a system was developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different aircraft class designations evolved for the various types of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. While reading this section, various references will be made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model Designation of Military Aircraft. All of these references refer to the same system involved in designating aircraft classes. This system is then used to develop the specific designations assigned to each type of aircraft operated by the Navy. The F3F-4, TBF-1, AD-3, PBY-5A, A-4, A-6E, and F/A-18C are all examples of specific types of naval aircraft designations, which were developed from the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Class Designation System Early Period of Naval Aviation up to 1920 The uncertainties during the early period of naval aviation were reflected by the problems encountered in settling on a functional system for designating naval aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Rounds in a King Air Saos–Maximum Slickness
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT APRIL 2016 $3.95 US VOLUME 20 NUMBER 4 Making The Rounds In A King Air SaOS–Maximum Slickness Push And Hold–To Live NBAA Focus APRIL 2016 TWIN & TURBINE • 1 The Worldwide General Aviation & Business Aviation Markets owner/operators and chief pilots of these aircraft ALL RECEIVE Twin &Turbine every month TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE JETS 1 DIAMOND I 40 HAWKER 1000A 34 LEARJET 36A 53 DIAMOND IA 9 HAWKER 125-1A 24 LEARJET 40 CHIEF PILOTS & OWNERS 3 DORNIER ENVOY 3 2 HAWKER 125-1AS 219 LEARJET 45 Aircraft Count 282 ECLIPSE EA500 1 HAWKER 125-3A/RA 193 LEARJET 45XR 47 EMBRAER LEGACY 600 2 HAWKER 125-400A 115 LEARJET 55 4 AIRBUS ACJ319 8 EMBRAER LEGACY 650 29 HAWKER 125-400AS 5 LEARJET 55B 32 ASTRA 1125 158 EMBRAER PHENOM 100 1 HAWKER 125-400B 12 LEARJET 55C 31 ASTRA 1125SP House Ad 82 EMBRAER PHENOM 300 4 HAWKER 125-600A 293 LEARJET 60 63 ASTRA 1125SPX 123 FALCON 10 11 HAWKER 125-600AS 130 PREMIER I 51 BEECHJET 400 28 FALCON 100 113 HAWKER 125-700A 16 SABRELINER 40 Full Page 275 BEECHJET 400A 25 FALCON 200 50 HAWKER 4000 13 SABRELINER 40A 58 BOEING BBJ 4/C Ad 176 FALCON 2000 187 HAWKER 400XP 7 SABRELINER 40EL 391 CHALLENGER 300 21 FALCON 2000EX 21 HAWKER 750 3 SABRELINER 40R 65 CHALLENGER 600 81 FALCON 20C 223 HAWKER 800A 24 SABRELINER 60 58 CHALLENGER 601-1A 17 FALCON 20C-5 2 HAWKER 800B 1 SABRELINER 60A 133 CHALLENGER 601-3A 26 FALCON 20D 335 HAWKER 800XP 2 SABRELINER 60AELXM 56 CHALLENGER 601-3R 3 FALCON 20D-5 14 HAWKER 800XPI 12 SABRELINER 60ELXM 279 CHALLENGER 604 7 FALCON 20E 67 HAWKER 850XP
    [Show full text]
  • How to Gain with Your Plane NASCAR Great Enhances His Conquest II Panel
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT FEBRUARY 2015 $3.95 US VOLUME 19 NUMBER 2 How To Gain With Your Plane NASCAR Great Enhances His Conquest II Panel Flying and Servicing The MU-2 Cold Weather Operating Tips Is The Vmc Demo A Circus Trick? The Worldwide General Aviation & Business Aviation Markets owner/operators and chief pilots of these aircraft ALL RECEIVE Twin &Turbine every month Do you want your marketing message to reach these key decision makers? It will when you advertise in Twin & Turbine TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE JETS 1 DIAMOND I 40 HAWKER 1000A 34 LEARJET 36A 303 CONQUEST I 5 MERLIN IV TWIN PISTON 8 2 ROCKWELL 520 53 DIAMOND IA 9 HAWKER 125-1A 24 LEARJET 40 354 CONQUEST II 13 MERLIN IV-A COMMANDER CHIEF PILOTS & OWNERS 3 DORNIER ENVOY 3 2 HAWKER 125-1AS 219 LEARJET 45 49 KING AIR 100 13 MERLIN IV-C OWNERS 15 ROCKWELL 560 Aircraft Count 282 ECLIPSE EA500 1 HAWKER 125-3A/RA 193 LEARJET 45XR 502 KING AIR 200 105 MITSUBISHI MARQUISE Aircraft Count COMMANDER 47 EMBRAER LEGACY 600 2 HAWKER 125-400A 115 LEARJET 55 12 KING AIR 200C 1 MITSUBISHI MU-2D 21 ROCKWELL 560A 4 AIRBUS ACJ319 9 ADAM A500 8 EMBRAER LEGACY 650 29 HAWKER 125-400AS 5 LEARJET 55B 12 KING AIR 200T 29 MITSUBISHI MU-2F COMMANDER 32 ASTRA 1125 1550 BARON 58 158 EMBRAER PHENOM 100 1 HAWKER 125-400B 12 LEARJET 55C House Ad 203 KING AIR 300 1 MITSUBISHI MU-2G 17 ROCKWELL 560E 31 ASTRA 1125SP 479 BARON 58P COMMANDER 82 EMBRAER PHENOM 300 4 HAWKER 125-600A 293 LEARJET 60 3 KING AIR 300LW 22 MITSUBISHI MU-2J 63 ASTRA 1125SPX 137 BARON 58TC 11 ROCKWELL 560F 123
    [Show full text]