DOCSLIB.ORG

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Canonical Form Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Canonical Form Of THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law and in Oriental Law: A Comparative Study With References to the Application of Catholic-Byzantine Law to Selected Pastoral Concerns In Eastern Europe. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Canon Law Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Canon Law © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Benone Farcas Washington, D.C. 2010 The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law and in Oriental Law: A Comparative Study With References to the Application of Catholic-Byzantine Law to Selected Pastoral Concerns In Eastern Europe. Benone Farcas, J.C.D. Director: John Beal, J.C.D. Book IV of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, title VII, chapter V and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, title XVI, chapter VII, article VI govern the canonical form of marriage. In many ways the provisions of the two codes are similar; in some instances, however, they differ. Both the similarities and the differences have pastoral consequences, especially in cases of mixed marriages or in territories where a hierarchical organization of various Oriental Catholic churches sui iuris does not exist. The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the canonical form of marriage by comparing the Latin and Oriental canonical legislations and analyzing the pastoral consequences that arise when laws concerning canonical form of marriage are applied in specific areas, especially in light of recent political and social changes in Eastern Europe. This comparative study of the canonical form of the marriage in the Latin and in the Catholic Oriental law, especially within the Byzantine rite, begins with an historical overview of the issue in both the Latin and the Byzantine traditions focused on specific documents and circumstances that had a significant impact on the evolution of canonical form. Subsequently, it considers the treatment of the canonical form of marriage in the 1917 Codex Iuris Canonici and post-codal legislation concerning the oriental churches, especially the motu proprio Crebrae allatae. Afterward this dissertation surveys the evolution of the issue in the conciliar and post-conciliar legislative documents. The same comparative method is applied in analyzing the present law as expressed in the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the 1990 Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. Finally, this dissertation analyzes selected pastoral issues peculiar to Eastern Europe after the fall of the communist governments. This last section investigates canonically a few concrete problem situations related to the canonical form of marriage and proposes a tentative solution for each one. This study reveals how important is for those involved in pastoral work to be acquainted with both Latin and Oriental matrimonial legislation within the context of interecclesial relationships and within the prospect of today‟s increasing global mobility. This dissertation by Benone Farcas fulfills the dissertation requirement for the doctoral degree in canon law approved by John Beal, J.C.D., as Director, and by Ronny Jenkins, M.A., S.T.L., J.C.D., and Robert Kaslyn, S.J., J.C.D.as Readers. ____________________________________ John Beal., J.C.D., Director ____________________________________ Ronny Jenkins, M.A., S.T.L., J.C.D., Reader ____________________________________ Robert Kaslyn, S.J., J.C.D., Reader ii This work is dedicated first of all to my father, Gheorghe Farcas, who entered eternal life on July 14, 2001, and my mother, Maria Farcas, who has prayed me through all my years of education. They first taught me to respect the laws of God and of the Church. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. x GENERAL INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………............................ 1 CHAPTER ONE THE CANONICAL FORM OF MARRIAGE IN RITE OF LATIN LAW AND THE RITE OF MARRIAGE IN EASTERN LAW Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………......... 8 A. The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law ………………………………………… 10 1. Clandestine Marriages ……………………………………………….………………... 10 2. The Council of Trent ………………………………………..…………………..……... 14 a. The conciliar debates at Bologna …………………………..……….…………… 14 b. The debates at Trent …………………………………………..…….…………… 18 c. The Decree Tametsi ………………………………………….……..……………. 25 d. Shortcomings of the Decree Tametsi …………………………………..……....... 29 3. The Post-Tridentine Legislation ..................................................................................... 36 a. The historical, religious and social circumstances ................................................. 36 b. The Benedictine Declaration ................................................................................. 39 c. Pertinent provisions issued after the Benedictine Declaration .............................. 43 d. The Decree Ne temere ............................................................................................ 45 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 47 B. The Rite of Marriage in Eastern Law ................................................................................ 49 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 49 1. The Development of Liturgical Celebration of Marriage iv in the Byzantine tradition ............................................................................................... 51 2. The Development of Liturgical Rite of Marriage in other Oriental Traditions .............. 54 3. Matrimonial Legislation in the Eastern Roman Empire ................................................. 58 a. Civil matrimonial legislation .................................................................................. 60 b. Theological and canonical approach to the matrimonial rite ................................. 65 4. The Development of the Oriental Rite of Marriage in Selected Countries of Eastern Europe ............................................................................................................ 67 a. The matrimonial rite in the Russian Orthodox Church in 17th and 18th centuries......................................................................................... 68 b. The Matrimonial rite in Moldavia and Walachia ................................................... 75 c. The marriage legislation of the Romanian Oriental Catholic Church in Transylvania ....................................................................................................... 78 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 86 CHAPTER TWO THE CANONICAL FORM OF MARRIAGE IN THE 1917 CODEX IURIS CANONICI, IN MOTU PROPRIO CREBRAE ALLATAE, AND IN CONCILIAR AND POST- CONCILIAR DOCUMENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................. 88 A. The Canonical Form of Marriage in 1917 Codex Iuris Canonici and in Motu Proprio Crebrea Allatae ............................................................................... 90 I. The form of marriage ....................................................................................................... 91 1. The pastor ............................................................................................................... 94 a. In Latin law ........................................................................................................ 94 b. In Oriental law ................................................................................................... 96 2. The local Ordinary ................................................................................................. 97 3. The local Hierarch .................................................................................................. 98 v 4. Witnesses ............................................................................................................. 100 5. Sacred rite ............................................................................................................ 103 6. Delegation vs. faculty .......................................................................................... 105 II. Assistance at marriage .................................................................................................. 106 1. Time of assistance ................................................................................................ 106 2. Place of assistance ................................................................................................ 110 3. Ritual affiliation ................................................................................................... 112 4. Manner of assistance ............................................................................................ 114 5. Assistance at marriages of Catholic faithful of different rites ............................. 115 6. Delegation to assist at a marriage ........................................................................ 122 7. Requirements for licit assistance at marriage ...................................................... 131 III. The extraordinary form of marriage ........................................................................... 139 IV. Persons subject
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History of The
    The History of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America The American Orthodox Catholic Church Old Catholic Orthodox Church Archbishop Gregory Morra, OSB Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Episcopal Imprimatur of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Old Catholic Orthodox Church This history of the church is hereby released under the authority of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide which is a direct blood descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church chartered in 1927 by Metropolitan Platon and later led by Archbishop Aftimios Ofiesh of Brooklyn, New York and eventually recognized as The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America. In its current form the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide and the Old Catholic Orthodox Church subsidiary recognizes the contributions of the early fathers of this historic church in the person of Metropolitan-Patriarch Denis M. Garrison (Emeritus) through the lineage of Archbishop Aftimios of blessed memory as the true spiritual father of the Church. Therefore, the Holy Synod hereby confers its official imprimatur on the history of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide as a direct historical descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church as outlined in this document. Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Petition for Marriage Permission Or Dispensation
    Form M2 Revised 9/2009 DIOCESE OF SPOKANE PETITION FOR MARRIAGE PERMISSION OR DISPENSATION GROOM BRIDE Name Name Address Address City, State City, State Date of Birth Date of Birth RELIGION Catholic Catholic Parish: Parish: Place: Place: Baptized non-Catholic Baptized non-Catholic Denomination: Denomination: Unbaptized Unbaptized Scheduled date and place for marriage: The following dispensation and permissions may be granted by the pastor for marriages celebrated within the territory his parish. Otherwise, the petition is submitted to the Local Ordinary. A. Disparity of Cult (C. 1086, a Catholic and a non-baptized person). See reverse side. B. Mixed Religion (and, if necessary, disparity of cult, C. 1124). See reverse side. C. Natural obligations from a prior union (C. 1071 3°). Marriage is permitted only when the pastor or competent authority is sure that these obligations are being fulfilled. D. Permission to marry when conditions are attached to a declaration of nullity—granted only if these stipulations have been fulfilled. (Cf. C. 1684) By virtue of the faculties granted to pastors of the Diocese of Spokane, I hereby grant the above indicated permissions/dispensation. Pastor: Date: (This document is retained in the prenuptial file) See p. 2 of this form for dispensations and permissions reserved to the Local Ordinary (Diocesan bishop, Vicar General or their delegate). Page 1 of 2 Form M2 In cases of Mixed Religion (Catholic and a baptized non-Catholic) or Disparity of Cult, the Catholic party is to make the following promise in writing or orally: “I reaffirm my faith in Jesus Christ and, with God’s help, intend to continue living that faith in the Catholic Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte
    Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa was consecrated as the Roman Catholic Diocesan Bishop of Botucatu in Brazil on December !" #$%&" until certain views he expressed about the treatment of the Brazil’s poor, by both the civil (overnment and the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil caused his removal from the Diocese of Botucatu. His Excellency was subsequently named as punishment as *itular bishop of Maurensi by the late Pope Pius +, of the Roman Catholic Church in #$-.. His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord Carlos Duarte Costa had been a strong advocate in the #$-0s for the reform of the Roman Catholic Church" he challenged many of the 1ey issues such as • Divorce" • challenged mandatory celibacy for the clergy, and publicly stated his contempt re(arding. 2*his is not a theological point" but a disciplinary one 3 Even at this moment in time in an interview with 4ermany's Die 6eit magazine the current Bishop of Rome" Pope Francis is considering allowing married priests as was in the old time including lets not forget married bishops and we could quote many Bishops" Cardinals and Popes over the centurys prior to 8atican ,, who was married. • abuses of papal power, including the concept of Papal ,nfallibility, which the bishop considered a mis(uided and false dogma. His Excellency President 4et9lio Dornelles 8argas as1ed the Holy :ee of Rome for the removal of His Excellency Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa from the Diocese of Botucatu. *he 8atican could not do this directly. 1 | P a g e *herefore the Apostolic Nuncio to Brazil entered into an agreement with the :ecretary of the Diocese of Botucatu to obtain the resi(nation of His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    THE RELIGIOUS STATE ACCORDING TO SUAREZ by John F. Martin, S.J. A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Canon Law, Saint Paul University, Ottawa, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Canon Law ,1 .u Ottawa* Ottawa, Canada, 1984 © John F. Martin, Ottawa, Canada, 1985. UMI Number: DC53636 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform DC53636 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Various circumstances have delayed the completion of this dissertation more than three years beyond the date I had originally anticipated. Accordingly, I wish to thank all those individuals whose patient encouragement has sustained me throughout the course of this project. In the first place, this study was made possible by my religious superiors and my brothers in Christ of the Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus. Two of these are deserving of special mention. Father Joseph P. Whelan, first as Assistant for Formation and Studies, and later as Provincial Superior of the Maryland Province, was the key influence in my embarking upon this work and in its sub­ sequent prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation Joseph Mele
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2008 Homiletics at the Threshold: Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation Joseph Mele Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Mele, J. (2008). Homiletics at the Threshold: Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/919 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOMILETICS AT THE THRESHOLD: POPE BENEDICT XVI‘S INVITATION A Dissertation Submitted to The McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Joseph M. Mele May 2008 Copyright by Joseph M. Mele 2008 HOMILETICS AT THE THRESHOLD: POPE BENEDICT XVI‘S INVITATION By Joseph M. Mele Approved Month Day, 2008 ____________________________ ____________________________ Name of Professor Name of Professor Professor of Professor of (Dissertation Director) (Committee Member) ____________________________ ____________________________ Name of Professor Name of Professor Professor of Professor of (Committee Member) (Committee Member) ___________________________ ____________________________ Name of Dean Name of External Reviewer Dean, The McAnulty
    [Show full text]
  • Against John Lane   
    Against John Lane R. J. M. I. By The Precious Blood of Jesus Christ, The Grace of the God of the Holy Catholic Church, The Mediation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Our Lady of Good Counsel and Crusher of Heretics, The Protection of Saint Joseph, Patriarch of the Holy Family, The Intercession of Saint Michael the Archangel and the cooperation of Richard Joseph Michael Ibranyi To Jesus through Mary Judica me Deus, et discerne causam meaum de gente non sancta as homine iniquo et doloso erue me Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam Original version: 9/2001; Current version: 12/2009 Mary’s Little Remnant 302 East Joffre St. TorC, NM 87901-2878 Website: www.JohnTheBaptist.us (Send for a free catalog) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS RJMI’ CONDEMNATION LETTER ............................................................................................................... 5 FALSE ECUMENISM ......................................................................................................................................... 5 IN COMMUNION WITH NON-CATHOLICS: DOES NOT PROFESS THE FAITH ................................................................... 7 CONCLUSION: TAKE SIDES ................................................................................................................................ 9 REFUTATION OF LANE’S ACCUSATIONS .................................................................................................. 10 NOTHING TRUE IN IBRANYI’S WRITINGS 9/28 ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exarch Josif I (1840-1915) (Real Name Lazar Yovchev) Is a Distinguished Bulgarian Orthodox Cleric
    Exarch Josif I (1840-1915) (real name Lazar Yovchev) is a distinguished Bulgarian Orthodox cleric. He was Bishop of Vidin, Metropolitan of the Lovech Diocese and Bulgarian Exarch – Head of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. Lazar Yovchev was born on the 5 of May 1840 in the enlightened town of Kalopher at the foot of the Balkan mountain. Studious and curious student during the primary school, he later became a teaching assistant of Botio Petkov, well known teacher in Kalopher and abroad. Supported by affuent Kalopher citizens living in Tzarigrad (Istanbul) he continued his studies in the Grand People’s School in Fener (in Turkish - Fener Rum Erkek Lisesi) and later in the French College (Tzarigrad). With the fnancial help of the Kalopher community he enrolled in 1864 in the prestigious Literary Faculty of the Sorbonne University (Paris). After three years study there he transferred to the Law School of the same university, which he graduated with a Bachelor degree and license to practice law. After six years in France, Lazar Yovchev returns to Tzarigrad and works at the Central Court of Commerce. In the same time he is active in political journalism and translation. He became a Board Member of the Macedonian Bulgarian Union (Makedonska Bylgarska Drujina). He was also invited to become a Secretary of the Joined Exarchate Council (Smesen Exarchiiski Syvet). Thanks to respect and popularity and without a formal ecclesiastical education, in 1872 the newly ordained monk becomes Coadjutor of the Exarch (equal to a Bishop reverence) under the monk name Yossif. In the next 3-4 years Bishop Yossif actively participates in the organization of the newly independent Bulgarian Church, travels the Bulgarian lands, meets representatives of the Great Powers, owing to his excellence in French, but mostly because of his ability to negotiate and persuade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtue of Penance in the United States, 1955-1975
    THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Maria Christina Morrow UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2013 THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Chair _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member Mary Ann Spearin Chair in Catholic Theology _______________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ William C. Mattison, III, Ph.D. Committee Member iii ABSTRACT THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation examines the conception of sin and the practice of penance among Catholics in the United States from 1955 to 1975. It begins with a brief historical account of sin and penance in Christian history, indicating the long tradition of performing penitential acts in response to the identification of one’s self as a sinner. The dissertation then considers the Thomistic account of sin and the response of penance, which is understood both as a sacrament (which destroys the sin) and as a virtue (the acts of which constitute the matter of the sacrament but also extend to include non-sacramental acts). This serves to provide a framework for understanding the way Catholics in the United States identified sin and sought to amend for it by use of the sacrament of penance as well as non-sacramental penitential acts of the virtue of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Marriage Nullity Cases in the United States of America from 2016-2018
    Statistical Analysis Marriage Nullity Cases in the United States of America from 2016-2018 Introduction Over three years have passed since the reform of the process for the declaration of the nullity of marriage legislated by the Motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus and Mitis et misericors Iesus has gone into effect. Due to the novelty of the Processus brevior coram Episcopo, there is much interest in the way it is being used. Several have already produced statistical studies. There are the two studies for the Ibero- American tribunals.1 In addition, the Canon Law Society of Great Britain and Ireland published in its 2019 Newsletter a statistical analysis for Tribunal activity in 2017.2 There is also the periodical Proceedings of the Canon Law Society of America, which began in 2017 to published the statistics for the briefer process.3 Scope and Method The present study seeks to analyze the statistics regarding the first instance activity of ecclesiastical Tribunals in the United States of America from 2016 through 2018. While some of above-mentioned studies relied heavily on reports of the Central Office of Statistics of the Church, the raw data for this study was gathered exclusively from the Annual Reports on the State and Activity of the Tribunal submitted to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. 4 Certainly this choice placed some limitations on the data intake; however, the report provides a unique data set including the number of appeals lodged by the defender of the bond. Throughout the study, several abbreviations are used: PB, processus brevior coram Episcopo PO, processus ordinarius DV, defensor vinculi 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See (Including Vatican City State)
    COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (MONEYVAL) MONEYVAL(2012)17 Mutual Evaluation Report Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism THE HOLY SEE (INCLUDING VATICAN CITY STATE) 4 July 2012 The Holy See (including Vatican City State) is evaluated by MONEYVAL pursuant to Resolution CM/Res(2011)5 of the Committee of Ministers of 6 April 2011. This evaluation was conducted by MONEYVAL and the report was adopted as a third round mutual evaluation report at its 39 th Plenary (Strasbourg, 2-6 July 2012). © [2012] Committee of experts on the evaluation of anti-money laundering measures and the financing of terrorism (MONEYVAL). All rights reserved. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. For any use for commercial purposes, no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the MONEYVAL Secretariat, Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg or [email protected] ). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PREFACE AND SCOPE OF EVALUATION............................................................................................ 5 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canon Law and Ecclesiology II the Ecclesiological Implications of the 1983 Code of Canon Law
    302 THEOLOGICAL TRENDS Canon Law and Ecclesiology II The Ecclesiological Implications of the 1983 Code of Canon Law Introduction N A PREVIOUS article, published in The Way, January 1982, I gave an I outline of the highly centralized and clerical view of the Church that was common in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This was the view of the Church that was expounded in most seminary text-books on the subject. It was this notion of the Church, too, that was reflected in the 1917 Code of Canon Law, and I indicated a number of examples of this centralized approach from the 1917 Code: local customs as such were considered undesirable (C.5); bishops were forbidden to grant dispensations from the general law of the Church, unless the faculty to do so had been expressly granted them by the Pope, or the case was particularly urgent. I also indicated that this same theological outlook was evident in the whole structure and content of Book II of the 1917 Code. I went on then to show how the second Vatican Council put forward a doctrine of the Church which puts greater emphasis on the importance of the local Church. The universal Church is now seen not primarily as a society of individuals, but as abody with different organs, each having its own proper characteristics, a communion of churches, together making up the Catholic Church. In this second article, I shall consider how this conciliar teaching has influenced the structure and contents of the new Code of Canon Law, promulgated by Pope John Paul II on 25 January of this year, 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • An Explanation of Parish Governance Updated September 30, 2016
    An Explanation of Parish Governance Updated September 30, 2016 Parish of Saint Monica • 2651 Atlantic Avenue • Atlantic City, NJ 08401 • 609-345-1878 • www.accatholic.org An Explanation of Parish Governance for The Parish of Saint Monica 1 The Parish of Saint Monica An Explanation of Parish Governance Purpose of this Document This document offers parishioners a comprehensive yet brief explanation of the governance of the Parish of Saint Monica. It cites several sources relevant to the governance of the parish: Code of Canon Law Decree of the Merger of the Parishes of Atlantic City and Establishment of The Parish of Saint Monica, June 5, 2015 Title 16 of the New Jersey Permanent Statutes, "Corporations and Associations, Religious" Certificate of Consolidation of The Parish of Saint Monica, Atlantic City, N.J., June 24, 2015 Bylaws of The Parish of Saint Monica, Atlantic City, N.J. Guidelines for Parish Finance Councils, Diocese of Camden, December 21, 2006 Guidelines for Parish Pastoral Councils, Diocese of Camden, November 2010 This document is not meant to replace these authoritative documents. Instead, this document is meant to summarize and systematize their substance. Where latitude exists, this document also determines some of the details of governance for our parish. Parish of Saint Monica • 2651 Atlantic Avenue • Atlantic City, NJ 08401 • 609-345-1878 • www.accatholic.org An Explanation of Parish Governance for The Parish of Saint Monica 2 Article I. The Parish in Canon Law Section A. Canonical Definition of Parish "A parish is a certain community of the Christian faithful stably constituted in a particular church, whose pastoral care is entrusted to a pastor (parochus) as its proper pastor (pastor) under the authority of the diocesan bishop." (can.
    [Show full text]