DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of The The History of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America The American Orthodox Catholic Church Old Catholic Orthodox Church Archbishop Gregory Morra, OSB Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Episcopal Imprimatur of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide Old Catholic Orthodox Church This history of the church is hereby released under the authority of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide which is a direct blood descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church chartered in 1927 by Metropolitan Platon and later led by Archbishop Aftimios Ofiesh of Brooklyn, New York and eventually recognized as The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America. In its current form the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide and the Old Catholic Orthodox Church subsidiary recognizes the contributions of the early fathers of this historic church in the person of Metropolitan-Patriarch Denis M. Garrison (Emeritus) through the lineage of Archbishop Aftimios of blessed memory as the true spiritual father of the Church. Therefore, the Holy Synod hereby confers its official imprimatur on the history of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide as a direct historical descendant of the American Orthodox Catholic Church as outlined in this document. Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB Metropolitan By the Authority of the Holy Synod of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide On this 27th day of February (NS) Anno Domini 2013 Feast of Saint Raphael Hawaweeny of Brooklyn The History of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide The history of the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide, hereinafter referred to as the “ŒCOCW,” has a long and glorious status, based upon its succession from the original American Orthodox Catholic Church, originally created as “The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America.” The American Orthodox Catholic Church was chartered in 1927 by Metropolitan Platon, primate of the then Russian Metropolia in an attempt by canonical Orthodox authorities to create an autocephalous Orthodox Church distinctively North American in expression and practice. The American Orthodox Catholic Church in its early years was ably guided by a young man by the name of Abdullah Aftimios Ofiesh as Archbishop of Brooklyn. The charter for this new church body on the North American continent was established in a letter from Metropolitan Sergius I (Stragorodsky), the 17th patriarch of Moscow and all Russia, which indicated that autonomous Orthodox churches could be founded outside Russia and granted to the new church body the full name “The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America,” informally referred as “The American Orthodox Catholic Church”. A portion of that letter of authority stated: “We hereby, on this 2nd day of February (new Style) in the year 1927, charge one of our number, His Eminence the Most Reverend Aftimios, Archbishop of Brooklyn, with the full responsibility and duty of caring and providing for American Orthodoxy in the especial sense of Orthodox Catholic people born in America and primarily English-speaking or any American residents or parishes of whatever nationality or linguistic character or derivation not satisfactorily provided with proper and canonical Orthodox Catholic care, +Archbishop Aftimios of Brooklyn ecclesiastical authority, teaching and ministrations of the Church or who may wish to attach themselves by the properly and legally provided means to an autonomous, independent, American Orthodox Catholic Church ... a distinct, independent, and autonomous branch of the Orthodox Catholic Church... (pp. 34-35).” In the creation of the Standing Conference of the Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA) and similar earlier Orthodox bodies, this attempt at establishing a canonical Orthodox body to serve Orthodox Christians in North America met with less than favorable reception. This is evidenced by the continued attempt today of creating an autocephalous or autonomous Orthodox jurisdiction and the obstacles impeding such development by jurisdictions headquartered in the “mother” countries. Despite these obstacles, the American Orthodox Catholic Church continued in its mission to establish viable Orthodox jurisdictions on North American soil that reflected American or New World sensibilities. One luminous development in this attempt to establish a truly North American Orthodoxy was the consecration of Bishop Sophronios (Anthony Bishara) of blessed memory as Bishop of Los Angeles with Episcopal responsibility for all parishes under the Russian Orthodox Church and all territory west of the Mississippi River. These developments were signs of potentially great success, however, with the erection of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North and South America the struggle for primacy by the “mother” churches increased, causing extensive difficulty for Archbishop Aftimios and the fledgling American Orthodox Catholic Church. Nevertheless, the battle continued even after the resignation of Archbishop Aftimios following extensive opposition by newly arriving Orthodox churches on the North American continent. In fraternal respect, the ŒCOCW refrains from enumerating the many unchristian trails that plagued the original founders of the Church and instead focuses on the canonical foundation of the successor jurisdictions of this original Orthodox Church in North America. Following many major challenges and the legal loss of the American Orthodox Catholic Church cathedral located in New York City in 1932, Archbishop Aftimios consecrated two new bishops to carry on this difficult work in the persons of Bishop Ignatius (Nichols) as Archbishop of Washington. Bishop Ignatius is recognized by many to have been the first convert Orthodox bishop in America (Damick, 2009). This assertion attests that Orthodoxy is not a recent addition to the North American religious landscape or North American cultural and ethnic +Archbishop Ignatius of Washington communities. To this leadership was added Bishop Joseph Zuk as Bishop of New Jersey and leader of the newly established Ukrainian Orthodox Church in the USA, being consecrated by Archbishop Aftimios and Bishop Sophornios Beshara in New York City to serve the Ukrainian Diocese. Bishop Joseph died in Florida in 1934 following a long illness (History of Ukrainian Orthodox Church, 2012). This brief history illustrates the official status of the American Orthodox Catholic Church as established under the unquestioned canonical authority of the Russian +Bishop Joseph Zuk of New Jersey Orthodox Church. An equally important highlight of this early Orthodox jurisdiction is the work accomplished by Metropolitan Sophronios Bishara, who is widely credited with the establishment of Western Rite Orthodoxy on the North American continent. This particular event has resulted in unqualified influence on North American Orthodoxy and is an accomplishment of which Archbishop Aftimios would be eminently proud. Out of these humble beginnings, the American Orthodox Catholic Church has operated under different names and has experienced many difficulties being beset by various internal coupes, desertions, and capitulations. However, despite stories of its demise following the retirement of Archbishop Aftimios and deaths of its early leaders such as Metropolitan Sophronios Bishara (1934), the American Orthodox Catholic Church has continued its difficult life and to date is an active Orthodox entity in a country of increasing ethnic, cultural, language, racial diversity, along with extensive diversity in liturgical complexity and beauty. +Metropolitan Sophronios Bishara On August 28, 1985, the Holy Synod of the American Orthodox Catholic Church following the unexpected death of Metropolitan Francis (Ryan), Bishop Denis Garrison was elected to succeed Metropolitan-Patriarch Francis, as Metropolitan-Patriarch c (Garrison) as Primate VIII of The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America/American Orthodox Catholic Church. Metropolitan- Patriarch DENIS was installed and enthroned by the Holy Synod on April 5, 1986 at St. Nicholas Orthodox Catholic Church in Eldersburg, Maryland, at the Council of Baltimore of the North American Holy Synod. +Metropolitan Denis Garrison From the hands of Metropolitan-Patriarch DENIS (Garrison), the church was renamed the Ecumenical Orthodox Catholic Communion. Metropolitan-Patriarch DENIS ably and unselfishly served the church from 1985 through 2005. In January 2005, Metropolitan-Patriarch DENIS resigned as Primate VII and the Church was placed in the hands of Archbishop Scholarios-Gennadius III, OSB as Chairman Pro Tempore with the intention of restructuring the church for service in the 21st century, with the reestablishment of all orders, titles, ecclesiology, and Episcopal privileges held and exercised by Metropolitan-Patriarch DENIS and his predecessors. In 2008, The Holy Synod renamed the Church as the Œcumenical Canonical Orthodox Church Worldwide (ŒCOCW) as a direct successor of The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America/American Orthodox Catholic Church. Following a special synod called by the bishops of the ŒCOCW, Archbishop Jorge Rodriguez-Villa was elected as Metropolitan-Patriarch of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parish Pastoral Council Guidelines
    PARISH PASTORAL COUNCIL GUIDELINES “Building up the Community of Believers” Archeparchy of Winnipeg 2007 ARCHEPARCHY OF WINNIPEG PARISH PASTORAL COUNCIL GUIDELINES I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 1. Origin ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Nature................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Pastoral Character............................................................................................................ 4 4. Pastoral Reflection............................................................................................................ 5 II. CHARACTERISTICS...................................................................................................... 6 1. Membership....................................................................................................................... 6 2. Leadership ......................................................................................................................... 8 3. Executive.......................................................................................................................... 10 4. Committees ...................................................................................................................... 11 5. Meetings..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical Committee Guidelines and Policies
    DIOCESE OF NEW WESTMINSTER Guidelines and Policies for the Canonical Process Leading to the Appointment of a Parish Incumbent, Associate Priest, or Assistant Priest January 2003 Table of Contents Introduction _______________________________________________ 3 When the First Meeting is Called______________________________ 3 The Canonical Committee ___________________________________ 3 The Parish Profile __________________________________________ 3 Advertising _______________________________________________ 4 Applications ______________________________________________ 5 The Bishop’s Advisory Committee on Appointments (BACA) ______ 5 Interviewing _______________________________________________ 6 Post-Interview _____________________________________________ 7 Appointment ______________________________________________ 7 Licence___________________________________________________ 7 Resignations ______________________________________________ 7 Timeline __________________________________________________ 8 General Comments _________________________________________ 9 2 Guidelines and Policies for the Canonical Process Revised January 30, 2003 Introduction The role of the Canonical Committee is to provide parish leadership and representation in the selection process of an Incumbent, Associate Priest or Assistant Priest. During this process the committee will work with the Bishop’s Office, the Regional Archdeacon and the Bishop’s Advisory Committee on Appointments. These guidelines do not apply to the appointment of a Curate for a two-year placement,
    [Show full text]
  • Multinormativity Emerges from Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations for Ecclesiastical Benefices in 19Th-Century Brazil
    ADMINISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR VERWALTUNGSGESCHICHTE BAND 5, 2020 SEITE 96–115 D O I : 10.2478/ADHI-2020-0007 Multinormativity Emerges From Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations for Ecclesiastical Benefices in 19th-Century Brazil ANNA CLARA LEHMANN MARTINS Introduction1 Nineteenth-century Brazilian ecclesiastical and discipline, the setting of diocesan limits, the control administration can be recognised as the object of a over norms issued by the Holy See, etc.4 Despite the system of multilevel governance orientated by a wide nationalist waves observed during the 19th century, the range of normative resources. Not only the local clergy, Brazilian Church was not excluded from contact with but also imperial institutions and the Roman Curia were the Holy See. On the contrary, the administration of engaged in diocesan administration. The responsibility imperial dioceses involved, to a greater or lesser extent, of the Empire of Brazil (1822–1889) towards Catholic interaction between local ecclesiastical authorities and institutions (churches, monasteries, seminaries, etc.) Roman dicasteries via the sending of reports, dubia, in its territory was due to the maintenance of royal requests for faculties and validations. patronage (padroado) after the country’s independence.2 This system of multilevel governance5 operated in Brazil echoed to some extent the legal pattern that had a scenario of coexistence of norms created/interpreted underlain the relationship between ecclesiastical and by different institutions and actors, in different secular powers in Portugal since the early modern historical periods. Matters of Church administration, period,3 but the novel Empire did so within a framework such as ecclesiastical examinations for the provision of of transition between the Ancien Régime and 19th- benefices (in Portuguese: concursos eclesiásticos para century liberal constitutionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Permission to Publish
    THE PERMISSION TO PUBLISH A Resource for Diocesan and Eparchial Bishops on the Approvals Needed to Publish Various Kinds of Written Works Committee on Doctrine • United States Conference of Catholic Bishops The Permission to Publish A Resource for Diocesan and Eparchial Bishops on the Approvals Needed to Publish Various Kinds of Written Works Committee on Doctrine • United States Conference of Catholic Bishops The document The Permission to Publish: A Resource for Diocesan and Eparchial Bishops on the Approvals Needed to Publish Various Kinds of Written Works was developed as a resource by the Committee on Doctrine of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). It was reviewed by the committee chairman, Archbishop William J. Levada, and has been author- ized for publication by the undersigned. Msgr. William P. Fay General Secretary, USCCB Excerpts from the Code of Canon Law: New English Translation. Translation of Codex Iuris Canonici prepared under the auspices of the Canon Law Society of America, Washington, D.C. © 1998. Used with permission. Excerpts from the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches: New English Translation. Translation of Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium pre- pared under the auspices of the Canon Law Society of America, Washington, D.C. © 2001. Used with permission. First Printing, June 2004 ISBN 1-57455-622-3 Copyright © 2004, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo- copying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, with- out permission in writing from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANGLICAN CHURCH in NEW ZEALAND 1945 to 2012
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. AN ANATOMY OF ANTIPODEAN ANGLICANISM: THE ANGLICAN CHURCH IN NEW ZEALAND 1945 to 2012 A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at Massey University, Albany New Zealand Volume 1 Noel William Derbyshire 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Abstract xiii Acknowledgements xv Abbreviations xvii Chronology xix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 The Demographic Context 33 2.1 Introduction 33 2.2 Trends in Affiliation 34 Anglican Affiliation 34 Christian Affiliation 35 Other Religions 39 The ‘Nones’ 40 2.3 Variables in the Religious Profile 41 Age 42 Fertility 43 Gender 45 Ethnicity 47 2.4 The Geography of Anglicanism 48 Major Urban Areas 50 Auckland 50 Sunbelt Areas 54 Southern South Island 54 Central North Island 55 2.5 Reliability of the Census as a Measure of Religious Affiliation 56 2.6 Conclusions 59 Chapter 3 Finance 61 3.1 Introduction 61 3.2 Parish Finances 63 Parish Finances: 1945-60 64 Parish Finances: 1960-75 and the Wells Campaigns 66 Parish Finances: 1975-2010 71 3.3 Stipendiary Ministry 74 3.4 Diocesan Finances 79 “What does it cost to run the Diocese?” 80 The Impact of Wells 83 Sources of Diocesan Incomes 85 3.5 The General Synod 87 The General Church Trust 89 i Diocesan Contributions 90 3.6 St John’s College Trust 92 3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Service of the Divine and Sacred Liturgy of ... John Chrysostom. Transl
    600100664N THE DIVINE LITURGY OF S. CHRYSOSTOM. f * i SERVICE OF THE 23ftune anli £>arreij liturgp : OF OUR HOLY FATHEB I JOHN CHRYSOSTOM. i * TRANSLATED FROM THR GREEK ACCORDING TO THE IDCBOLOOION, AND COMPARED WITH THE SLAVONIC. LONDON : JOSEPH MASTERS, ALDERSGATE STREET, AND NEW BOND STREET. HDCCCLXVI. *- -TttnrrtlfT. I LONDON I ritlNTKD BY JOSEPH MAfTEBS AND ION, ALDEBSO.VTE STREET. LITURGY. EiturflB of the <ttatecf)umen0. The Deacon goeth out from the Bema, and standing in the accustomed place, ami adoring thrice, saith. Bless, Master. The Prir.it aloud : Blessed be the kingdom of the Fa- thee, and of the Son, and of the Holt Ghost, now and ever, and to the ages of ages. The Choir. Amen. The Deacon, or if there be nam, the Priest : In peace let us pray of the Lorp. b 2 THE DIVINE LITUBGY The Choir. Kyrie eleison. For the peace from above, and the salvation of our souls, let us pray of the Loed. The Choir. Kyrie eleison. For the peace of the whole world, the welfare of the Holy Churches of God, and the union of them all, let us pray of the Loed. The Choir. Kyrie eleison. For this holy house, and them that with faith, reverence, and fear of God, enter into it, let us pray of the Loed. The Choir. Kyrie eleison. For our Archbishop (natnejthe hon ourable Presbytery, the Diaconate in Cheist, all the clergy and the people, let us pray of the Loed. The Choir. Kyrie eleison. For our most religious kings, in the keeping of God, all their court and their army, let us pray of the Loed.
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical Aspects of the Relationship Between the Patriarch and the Synod of Bishops in a Patriarchal Church
    CANONICAL ASPECTS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATRIARCH AND THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS IN A PATRIARCHAL CHURCH by James SALAMY Research Seminar – DCA 6395 Prof. John HUELS Faculty of Canon Law Saint Paul University Ottawa 2018 © James Salamy_2018 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 – A PERICHORESIS OF THE ONE AND THE MANY ........................................................1 1.1 – Practical Advantages .........................................................................................................1 1.2 – Definitions.........................................................................................................................1 1.2.1 – Patriarch ...................................................................................................................1 1.2.2 – Synod of Bishops .....................................................................................................8 2 – THE POWERS OF THE PATRIARCH AND THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS ..................12 2.1 – Intermediate Authority ....................................................................................................12 2.2 – In Relation to the Patriarchal Territory ...........................................................................15 2.2.1 – Inside the Patriarchal Territory ..............................................................................19 2.2.2 – Outside of the Patriarchal Territory .......................................................................27 3 – THE ALLOCATION OF POWER ......................................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    E2032 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks October 1, 2007 Never one to shy away from the tough ices to those in need, it also is ‘‘a wonderful National Flood Insurance Program to include questions, Paul earned his reputation as being place for the community to come together and coverage for wind damage. a tough but fair interviewer, whose only moti- connect,’’ says executive director Deanna Multi-peril coverage, or the coverage of both vation was to provide his listeners with the Euritt. wind and flood risk in one policy, has proven most up-to-date information available. Novato has a very strong sense of commu- especially important in the aftermath of Hurri- He has given back to the Kearney commu- nity, she explains, and it is because of the canes Katrina and Rita as survivors continue nity in so many ways—as an instructor, a vol- community’s support that the center exists and to struggle to receive fair compensation for the unteer, and a member of many local commu- continues to operate. ‘‘We’re very grateful to damages they experienced. Private insurers nity boards—yet I fully expect this service to the City of Novato and all the residents who have used anti-concurrent causation clauses continue. live here who have been very generous not to deny payment for damages on the grounds I wish him well in his retirement and I hope only with their financial contributions, but with that the damages occurred as a result of he knows how much he will be missed. their time.’’ flooding, which is covered by the Federal gov- f As one donor said, ‘‘God’s been really good ernment.
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical Elections
    <? O , o " c * 4 o c0^ c^:=.,^o^ ^-^^ .'/J^.^ ^^ ^.* ^^ -^"^ H Ct3 CANONICAL ELECTIONS Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THEOLOGY OF THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF CANON LAW By DANIEL M. GALLIHER, O. P., J. C. L. Catholic University of America J9J7 CANONICAL ELECTIONS Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THEOLOGY OF THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF CANON LAW By DANIEL M. GALLIHER, O. P., J, C L. Catholic University of America J9J7 ^v^< iV?7w7 O&^^a^ 4- THOMAS J. SHAHAN, S. T. D., Censor Deputatus. Imprimatur : M. CARD. GIBBONS, Archiepiscopus Baltimorensis. Approbatio Ordinis Nihil Obstat: FR. JOSEPHUS KENNEDY, O. P., S. T. M. FR. AUGUSTINUS WALDRON, O. P., S. T. M. Imprimatur : FR. RAYMUNDUS MEAGHER, O. P., S. T. L., Prior Provincialis. The Rosary Press, Somerset, Ohio 1917 ^ t ^ (^^ CANONICAL ELECTIONS CONTENTS Introduction 5 Historical Concept 7 Juridical Concept 21 Qualifications of Electors 31 Convocation of Electors 45 Persons Eligible 54 The Act of Election 67 Postulation 83 Defects in Election 87 Subsequent Acts 96 Appendix—I. Manner of Electing a Sovereign Pontiff 104 11. Method of Selecting Bishops in the United States 107 Sources and Bibliography Ill — INTRODUCTION There is no institution, perhaps, that occupies a more prom- inent place in the entire history of ecclesiastical legislation than canonical election. For the Church during the almost twenty centuries of her active life has promulgated for no other institu- tion such a vast and varied array of enactments, decrees, and con- stitutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th SUNDAY After PENTECOST
    Vol. 57, No. 49 4 DECEMBER, AD 2011 25th SUNDAY AFTER PENTECOST: BRIGHT (GOLD) VESTMENTS. Tone 8. Matins Gospel # 3: Mark 16:9-20. The holy and Great-Martyr Barbara and the holy martyr Juliana (286-305); Our Ven- erable Father John of Damascus (749); our ven. Father and priest-martyr Sera- phim, bishop of Phanar. 5:00 PM – DIVINE LITURGY (all English, recited) SATURDAY, DEC. 3 +Dmytro & Daria Drechsler (Family) Fr. Yaroslav There will be no 7:45 am MATINAL LITURGY on SUNDAY, DEC. 4 9:00 AM - DIVINE LITURGY (Ukrainian and Old Church Slavonic; choir) +John & Viola Cashi (Family) Fr. Yaroslav 11:30 AM - DIVINE LITURGY (English; congregational singing) + God’s Blessings on Parishioners Fr. Yaroslav The vespers for the Feast of St Nicholas will be on Monday evening, Dec 5. th 26 MONDAY (ACTS OF PENANCE ARE ENCOURAGED ON ALL WEEKDAYS OF THE ST. PHILIP’S FAST) DECEMBER 5 Our Venerable and God-bearing Father Sabbas the “Sanctified“, meaning “ordained” because in the early Church all monks were called “fathers,” but not all monks were ordained as priests (532); holy martyr Nectarius of Betelia. 9:00 AM +Steve Kurhan (Dolores & Martin Schultz) Fr. Yaroslav 7:00 PM – VESPERS FOR FEAST OF ST. NICHOLAS in the chapel, in English, with blessing of non-perishables DONATED TO THE COLLECTIONS BEING CONDUCTED BY OUR CHURCH AUXILIARY Fr. Yaroslav TH 26 TUESDAY (ACTS OF PENANCE ARE ENCOURAGED ON ALL WEEKDAYS OF THE ST. PHILIP’S FAST) DECEMBER 6 FEAST OF OUR HOLY FATHER AMONG THE SAINTS NICHOLAS THE MIRACLEWORKER, ARCHBISHOP OF MYRA IN LYCIA (TRADITIONALLY CA.
    [Show full text]
  • "And the Son" in Regard to the Eastern
    ON THE CLAUSE “AND THE SON,” IN REGARD TO THE EASTERN CHURCH AND THE BONN CONFERENCE. A LETTER TO THE REV. H. P. LIDDON, D.D. IRELAND PROFESSOR OF EXEGESIS, CANON OF S. PAUL’S. BY THE REV. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. REGIUS PROFESSOR OF HEBREW, AND CANON OF CHRIST CHURCH. SOLD BY JAMES PARKER & CO., OXFORD, AND 377, STRAND, LONDON; RIVINGTONS, LONDON, OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE; AND POTT, YOUNG & CO., NEW YORK. 1876. Project Canterbury edition AD 2002 On the Clause “And the Son,” by Edward Bouverie Pusey. (1876) MY DEAREST FRIEND, YOU wish me to state briefly my thoughts, as to the restoration of intercommunion with the Greek Church, and, as bearing on this, what I desiderate in the propositions adopted at the Bonn Conference, and how they could be modified, so that I could myself accept them. This I do the more readily, because it was partly at my instance that you undertook that journey to Bonn, at much inconvenience, I believe, to yourself, and because I know that we are substantially of one mind on this subject, as on others. I hope that I may do this less unsatisfactorily, if I embody in it, what I wrote, two years ago on this, the saddest of all our sad controversies. For it is, in the end, a controversy as to the Being of God, among those who really believe in God, who prize right and true belief in God above all things, who, each, doubt not that they have the right belief, and who do believe the same one with the other, if they could but look calmly at each other’s mode of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorization for Lay Ecclesial Ministers a Canonical Reflection
    AUTHORIZATION FOR LAY ECCLESIAL MINISTERS A CANONICAL REFLECTION By Paul L. Golden, C.M., J.C.D. Introduction The role of the laity in the ministry of the Church has become more clear and more needed since the close of the Second Vatican Council. Our bishops have discussed, debated and written about the ministry of the laity. They have encouraged lay people to prepare themselves and to accept certain positions in the public ministry of the Church. Out of all this prayer and discussion between Bishops and the laity, we now have a term for members of the faithful who assume leadership roles in the Church: lay ecclesial ministers. I have been asked to offer some canonical reflections on the authorization of these ministers. The Nature and Function of Canon Law I think it is appropriate at the beginning to say a few words about the nature and purpose of canon law in the Church. It has been said that canon law is the practical expression of the Church’s understanding of itself. In formulating the law, the Church translates her theological, liturgical and spiritual teachings into norms and behaviors so that the traditions and life of the People of God can be seen and ordered. Law, then, functions as a witness to the faith, charisma and charity of the Church.1 There are two fundamental types of norms in our law. Some norms describe the basic structure of the Church’s organization, for example, the offices of the papacy and the episcopate and the various organizations in a diocese or a parish.
    [Show full text]