DOCSLIB.ORG

Against John Lane   

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Against John Lane    Against John Lane R. J. M. I. By The Precious Blood of Jesus Christ, The Grace of the God of the Holy Catholic Church, The Mediation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Our Lady of Good Counsel and Crusher of Heretics, The Protection of Saint Joseph, Patriarch of the Holy Family, The Intercession of Saint Michael the Archangel and the cooperation of Richard Joseph Michael Ibranyi To Jesus through Mary Judica me Deus, et discerne causam meaum de gente non sancta as homine iniquo et doloso erue me Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam Original version: 9/2001; Current version: 12/2009 Mary’s Little Remnant 302 East Joffre St. TorC, NM 87901-2878 Website: www.JohnTheBaptist.us (Send for a free catalog) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS RJMI’ CONDEMNATION LETTER ............................................................................................................... 5 FALSE ECUMENISM ......................................................................................................................................... 5 IN COMMUNION WITH NON-CATHOLICS: DOES NOT PROFESS THE FAITH ................................................................... 7 CONCLUSION: TAKE SIDES ................................................................................................................................ 9 REFUTATION OF LANE’S ACCUSATIONS .................................................................................................. 10 NOTHING TRUE IN IBRANYI’S WRITINGS 9/28 .................................................................................................... 10 THE BAPTISM CONTROVERSY 9/28 .................................................................................................................. 11 Lane’s Reply (9/29): ................................................................................................................................... 11 IMPLIES SAINTS ARE INFALLIBLE 9/28 ............................................................................................................... 12 LATAE SENTENTIAE EXCOMMUNICATIONS 9/29 ................................................................................................. 13 Lane Reply (11/19) ..................................................................................................................................... 15 DOES LANE TEACH MANIFEST HERETICS CAN BE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH? (10/1) .................................................. 15 RJMI Question 1 (10/1): ............................................................................................................................. 16 Lane’s Reply: .............................................................................................................................................. 16 MINOR AND MAJOR EXCOMMUNICATIONS (10/1) ............................................................................................. 16 Lane’s Reply: .............................................................................................................................................. 17 LANE SAYS CUM EX APOSTOLATUS IS NOT IN FORCE (10/1) .................................................................................. 17 LANE TEACHES A POPE CANNOT TEACH HERESY IN FALLIBLE CAPACITY (10/1) ............................................................ 18 RJMI Questions 2 (10/1): ........................................................................................................................... 20 Lane’s Reply (10/15): ................................................................................................................................. 21 PUBLIC DEFECTION FROM THE CATHOLIC FAITH AND PRELATES WHO BECOME INSANE (10/1) .................................... 24 SEMANTICS: MANIFEST VS. PUBLIC & PRESUME VS. ASSUME (10/2) ..................................................................... 26 PUBLIC DEFECTION (10/3) ............................................................................................................................. 28 BAD THEOLOGY & PERTINACITY/OBSTINACY (10/3) ........................................................................................... 29 More Quotes on Presumption of Malice (11/19) ............................................................................................ 32 RJMI Questions (10/3): .............................................................................................................................. 34 DOES LANE IMPLY THE CONCILIAR CHURCH IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH? (10/15) ...................................................... 35 RJMI Questions (10/15): ............................................................................................................................ 37 OPEN LETTER TO JOHN LANE 11/12/2001 ....................................................................................................... 37 LANE EFFECTIVELY DENIES LATAE SENTENTIAE EXCOMMUNICATIONS (11/19) .......................................................... 39 False Analogy .................................................................................................................................................. 42 RJMI Question 1 (11/19): ........................................................................................................................... 43 Violent Hands on the Pope and Tolarati and Vitandi Heretics ........................................................................ 43 RJMI Question 2 (11/19): ........................................................................................................................... 48 Classes of Heretics .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Ad Evitanda Scandala ...................................................................................................................................... 49 Public Defection and Automatic Excommunication ........................................................................................ 50 WARNING AGAINST SOURCES (11/19)............................................................................................................. 51 NO ANSWERS FROM JOHN LANE (12/31) ......................................................................................................... 51 RJMI QUESTION 1 (10/1): ............................................................................................................................ 52 RJMI QUESTIONS 2 (10/1): .......................................................................................................................... 52 RJMI QUESTIONS (10/3): ............................................................................................................................. 52 RJMI QUESTIONS (10/15): ........................................................................................................................... 53 RJMI QUESTION 1 (11/19): .......................................................................................................................... 53 RJMI QUESTION 2 (11/19): .......................................................................................................................... 53 3 4 RJMI’ Condemnation Letter J.M.J. Mr. John Lane, First things first before I refute your silly, foolish, dishonest, and deceptive refutation of the teachings of the Catholic Church as found on my website. My duty as a Catholic obliges me to profess the Catholic faith. That duty obliges me to condemn you as a non- Catholic heretic and schismatic. You, sir, are an abomination in the eyes of God and are under His severe wrath, along with anyone associated with you in religious matters in anyway. No, John, I am not a diplomat, or a politician, or a compromiser—traits that belong to the secular realm. I am a Catholic whose duty is to clearly speak the truth and admonish and condemn the sinner, when it applies, and if I do not, then woe to me. “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman to the house of Israel: and thou shalt hear the word out of my mouth, and shalt tell it them from me. If, when I say to the wicked, Thou shalt surely die: thou declare it not to him, nor speak to him, that he may be converted from his wicked way, and live: the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity, but I will require his blood at thy hand. But if thou give warning to the wicked, and he be not converted from his wickedness, and from his evil way: he indeed shall die in his iniquity, but thou hast delivered thy soul.” (Ezechiel 3:17- 19) False Ecumenism Mr. John Lane, you are not Catholic on many counts, the most obvious of which I will now mention, so that a simple child of good will can see. There is only one Catholic Church and one Catholic faith (Eph. 4:5). Catholics are not to associate with, or converse on an equal basis with non-Catholics in religious matters. Your website is a tangled web of contradictions the equals that of the Conciliar Church, of which you are still a member of by way of association. Your website is nothing more than a Vatican III false ecumenism for traditionalist heretics and schismatics of the pseudo-intellectual stripe, who are “ever learning and never attaining to the knowledge of the truth” (2Tim. 3:7). A room full of Protestants and Schismatics will profess many individual truths while contradicting one another in areas of dogmatic truth regarding the faith and unity of the Church. In no way can such a congregation, as is the World Council of Churches, represent, or be, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canon Law and Ecclesiology II the Ecclesiological Implications of the 1983 Code of Canon Law
    302 THEOLOGICAL TRENDS Canon Law and Ecclesiology II The Ecclesiological Implications of the 1983 Code of Canon Law Introduction N A PREVIOUS article, published in The Way, January 1982, I gave an I outline of the highly centralized and clerical view of the Church that was common in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This was the view of the Church that was expounded in most seminary text-books on the subject. It was this notion of the Church, too, that was reflected in the 1917 Code of Canon Law, and I indicated a number of examples of this centralized approach from the 1917 Code: local customs as such were considered undesirable (C.5); bishops were forbidden to grant dispensations from the general law of the Church, unless the faculty to do so had been expressly granted them by the Pope, or the case was particularly urgent. I also indicated that this same theological outlook was evident in the whole structure and content of Book II of the 1917 Code. I went on then to show how the second Vatican Council put forward a doctrine of the Church which puts greater emphasis on the importance of the local Church. The universal Church is now seen not primarily as a society of individuals, but as abody with different organs, each having its own proper characteristics, a communion of churches, together making up the Catholic Church. In this second article, I shall consider how this conciliar teaching has influenced the structure and contents of the new Code of Canon Law, promulgated by Pope John Paul II on 25 January of this year, 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Clergy Sexual Abuse Meets the Civil Law Thomas P
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 31 | Number 2 Article 6 2004 Catholic Clergy Sexual Abuse Meets the Civil Law Thomas P. Doyle Catholic Priest Stephen C. Rubino Ross & Rubino LLP Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas P. Doyle and Stephen C. Rubino, Catholic Clergy Sexual Abuse Meets the Civil Law, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 549 (2004). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol31/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CATHOLIC CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE MEETS THE CIVIL LAW Thomas P. Doyle, O.P., J.C.D.* and Stephen C. Rubino, Esq.** I. OVERVIEW OF THE PROBLEM In 1984, the Roman Catholic Church began to experience the complex and highly embarrassing problem of clergy sexual miscon- duct in the United States. Within months of the first public case emerging in Lafayette, Louisiana, it was clear that this problem was not geographically isolated, nor a minuscule exception.' In- stances of clergy sexual misconduct surfaced with increasing noto- riety. Bishops, the leaders of the United States Catholic dioceses, were caught off guard. They were unsure of how to deal with spe- cific cases, and appeared defensive when trying to control an ex- panding and uncontrollable problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selection of Bishops: Exploring Canonical Alternatives
    The Selection of Bishops: Exploring Canonical Alternatives John Huels, OSM Richard R. Gaillardetz In this essay we will address an issue of church polity. While doctrinal disputes on questions related to justification, the filioque or sacramental theology have received more attention, it is the concrete questions of church polity which may constitute the greater obstacle to the achievement of full visible union among the Christian churches. With that in mind we will focus our attention on the concrete processes related to the selection of bishops. While this might seem a fairly secondary, administrative concern, in fact, the current procedures for the selection of bishops, insofar as they reinforce perceptions of the Catholic church as a monolithic, quasi-monarchical institution, play a highly symbolic role in ecumenical dialogue. A significant revision of these procedures might go a long way towards dispelling these perceptions. We recognize, of course, that not all Christian churches acknowledge the need for an episcopate which succeeds to the authority of the college of apostles. On the other hand, the last two decades have seen a growing convergence in ecumenical dialogue toward affirming the value of such an episcopate. The influential Lima document, Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry, affirmed the importance of episcopal ministry and called for those Christian traditions without an episcopate to reconsider their position on Selection of Bishops -- 2 this question.1 A revision of current canonical procedures within the Roman Catholic church, to the extent that they would clarify the nature of the episcopate as an apostolic service to the church, might help these traditions decide in favor of such an episcopate.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA the Canonical Form Of
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law and in Oriental Law: A Comparative Study With References to the Application of Catholic-Byzantine Law to Selected Pastoral Concerns In Eastern Europe. A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Canon Law Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Canon Law © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Benone Farcas Washington, D.C. 2010 The Canonical Form of Marriage in Latin Law and in Oriental Law: A Comparative Study With References to the Application of Catholic-Byzantine Law to Selected Pastoral Concerns In Eastern Europe. Benone Farcas, J.C.D. Director: John Beal, J.C.D. Book IV of the 1983 Code of Canon Law, title VII, chapter V and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, title XVI, chapter VII, article VI govern the canonical form of marriage. In many ways the provisions of the two codes are similar; in some instances, however, they differ. Both the similarities and the differences have pastoral consequences, especially in cases of mixed marriages or in territories where a hierarchical organization of various Oriental Catholic churches sui iuris does not exist. The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the canonical form of marriage by comparing the Latin and Oriental canonical legislations and analyzing the pastoral consequences that arise when laws concerning canonical form of marriage are applied in specific areas, especially in light of recent political and social changes in Eastern Europe. This comparative study of the canonical form of the marriage in the Latin and in the Catholic Oriental law, especially within the Byzantine rite, begins with an historical overview of the issue in both the Latin and the Byzantine traditions focused on specific documents and circumstances that had a significant impact on the evolution of canonical form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic University of America Heresy By
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA HERESY BY ASSOCIATION: The Canonical Prohibition of Freemasonry in History and in the Current Law A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Canon Law Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctorate in Canon Law By Edward F. Condon Washington, D.C. 2015 ABSTRACT Despite the remarkable continuity, over the centuries, of the Catholic Church’s condemnation of Freemasonry and the clarity of her rationale for doing so, the current canonical discipline of Catholic-Masonic issues is the subject of considerable confusion. The canonical prohibition of Catholic membership of a Masonic Lodge, or society, was expressly articulated in canon 2335 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, which attached a penalty of excommunication, latae sententiae. Further canonical effects explicitly linked to Masonry were contained in six additional canons spread throughout the Code. The 1983 Code of Canon Law contains no explicit mention of Freemasonry. Canon 1374 provides for indeterminate penalties for those who joins societies which “plot against the Church”, but there is no consensus of what the canonical definition of plotting (machinationem) means, nor which societies, if any, might be intended by the canon. This dissertation seeks, through historical analysis of the origins of Freemasonry itself, and the Church’s teaching against it, to correctly place Freemasonry, specifically membership of a Masonic society by a Catholic, within the penal law of the 1983 Code. Chapter I traces the origins of Freemasonry and the Church’s opposition to it, through to the codification of the 1917 Code of Canon Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Prajak Boonphao Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Canon Law, Saint
    CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN PASTORAL CARE OF PERSONS IN MARRIAGES BETWEEN ROMAN CATHOLICS AND BUDDHISTS IN THAILAND Prajak Boonphao Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Canon Law, Saint Paul University, Ottawa, Canada, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Canon Law Faculty of Canon Law Saint Paul University, Ottawa © Prajak Boonphao, Ottawa, Canada, 2020 ii ABSTRACT Marriage is an institution based on natural law. Every person has the natural right to marriage which is, however, affected by cultural and social conditions. The pastors of the Church, therefore, have to make every effort to understand the particularity of situations within which marriage and family are lived today and respond accordingly through their pastoral action. Thailand is considered a Buddhist country due to the fact that the vast majority of its population is Buddhist. Most marriages celebrated in the Catholic Church are non- sacramental because a Buddhist is the spouse of the Catholic party. Canon 1086 of the 1983 Code states that due to the impediment of disparity of worship, a marriage between a person who was baptized in the Catholic Church or received into it and a non-baptized person is invalid. A dispensation from this impediment must be granted by the competent authority in order for the union to be valid. The conditions stated in cc. 1125–1126 must be taken into account for a dispensation to be granted. The thesis identifies the actual pastoral problems faced by persons in marriages with the disparity of worship and canonical questions faced by Church authorities; it also proposes canonical-pastoral responses to such cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Volunteers
    Graduate Theological Foundation CATHOLIC VOLUNTEERS: Theology and Practice, with Special Reference to the 1997 Papal Instruction Ecclesiae De Mysterio A Dissertation Submitted in Candidacy for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By the Reverend David James Mulvihill South Bend, Indiana Convocation 1999 ABBREVIATIONS AA Second Vatican Council, Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity Apostolicam actuositatem, AAS 58 (1966), 837-864; in English: Abbott, 489-521; Flannery I, 766-798. AAS Acta Apostolicae Sedis, Rome 1909- The Vatican gazette, published a varying number of times each year, with the original text of the most important Vatican documents. The text is usually in Latin. Abbott Documents of Vatican II, ed. Walter M. Abbott, S.J. Chapman, 1966. AcDocVat Acta et Documenta Concilio Oecumenico Vaticano II apparando, Series I, (Antepreparatoria), vols. I-IV, Indices. Vatican City, 1960-1961; Series II, (Preparatoria), vols. I-III. Vatican City State 1964-1969. AcSynVat Acta Synodalia Sacrosancti Concilii Oecumenici Vaticani II, vols. I-IV, Indices. Vatican City, 1970- AG Second Vatican Council, Decree on the Church’s Missionary Activity Ad Gentes: AAS 58 (1966), 947-990; in English: Abbott, 584-630; Flannery I, 813-856. AkK Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht (Innsbruck, 1957-); formerly Mainz (1862-). ASS Acta Sanctae Sedis, Rome 1865-1908. Beginning with 1909, this Vatican gazette, with the original text of the most important Vatican documents, had a name change to Acta Apolisticae Sedis. c. “canon” in the 1983 Code of Canon Law. CIC prefixing a number indicates the canon in the 1917 Code of Canon Law. For other places such as the Lex Ecclesiae Fundamentalis, the word canon is not abbreviated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chair Is Still Empty: a Reply to John Salza (Part 2) by Gregorius
    The Chair Is Still Empty: A Reply to John Salza (Part 2) by Gregorius www.NovusOrdoWatch.org This second installment of our response to Milwaukee-based attorney John Salza’s critiques of sedevacantism will focus on Mr. Salza’s second article, “Sedevacantism and the Sin of Presumption,” published in April of 2011 in Catholic Family News. It is also available online from Salza’s web site, at http://www.scripturecatholic.com/feature-articles/CFN%20-%20Sedevacantism%20and%20the%20Sin 20of%20Presumption.pdf Evaluating “Sedevacantism and the Sin of Presumption” as a whole, it is by no means an exaggeration to say that the essay is an extremely shoddy work of intolerably poor scholarship, indeed nothing short of a canonical and theological disaster. Even though the author managed to include as many as six footnotes this time – definitely a step up from his first article, which had none – it would have been good if the references in those footnotes actually supported his case. What is more, the entire paper reads as though it had been put together in a hurry, perhaps to meet a publication deadline, almost as though it were merely a rough draft rather than the finished product. One might expect such from a sophomore in college who’s trying to “wing” a paper he didn’t want to write in the first place, but not from a man who holds a doctorate degree in law and presents himself as a competent apologist on matters of Church law and theology. His writings are being treated by some as though they were the ultimate rebuttal to the sedevacantist position, when in fact they are hardly more than an embarrassing pseudo-scholarly attempt to defend the apostasy of the New Church as somehow “not proven” or “not provable.” Put bluntly, when a man who claims to be the Pope invites demon worshippers to pray for “peace” and facilitates their satanic rituals by providing them with rooms to use for this purpose in a Roman Catholic monastery, smart-alecky questions like “How do you know he’s pertinacious?” and ridiculous excuses like “Maybe he doesn’t know better” are simply out of place.
    [Show full text]
  • Canon Law and the Human Person John J
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 2003 Canon Law and the Human Person John J. Coughlin Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation John J. Coughlin, Canon Law and the Human Person, 19 J. L. & Religion 1 (2003-2004). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/726 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CANON LAW AND THE HUMAN PERSON Rev. John J. Coughlin, O.F.M f I. INTRODUCTION This article explores the unity of law and theology in the 1983 Code of Canon Law [hereinafter CIC-1983].' The unity has remained critical since canon law emerged in the ancient Church.2 From the origins of the primitive Christian communities through the patristic era, the Church manifested a tension between charism and office, spirit and law? The medieval canonists achieved a great synthesis of the reason of law and faith of theology.4 The unified theory helped to form the basis t Professor of Law, Notre Dame University School of Law. J.C.D., J.C.L., Pontifical Gregorian University; J.D., Harvard Law School; Th.M., Princeton Theological Seminary; M.A., Columbia University; B.A., Niagara University. The author wishes to thank Monsignor William J. Toohy, Esq., and Professors John Finnis, M. Cathleen Kaveny and John Mansfield for their many helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Church and State Relations in the Constitution of Malta
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Analecta Cracoviensia Polonia Sacra 22 (2018) nr 2 (51) ∙ s. 175–199 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15633/ps.2505 Kevin Aquilina1 University of Malta Church and State Relations in the Constitution of Malta The Constitution of Malta (hereinafter ‘the Constitution’), the highest law of the land, regulates the relationship between the Catholic Church and the State of Malta. This is because there are a number of provisions in the Constitution which refer to the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church and to religion as discussed below. First, there is the provision which includes the Catholic religion amongst the state’s symbols. Then there is the provision which regulates the teaching of religion in state schools. Finally, there are provisions in the Constitution which deal with freedom of conscience and worship. It is understandable that the Constitution contains such provisions on the Church and on religion because Malta is a Catholic country. However, this paper recounts, from a historic and le- gal perspective, that recent secularisation trends are eroding the special status that the Church and the Catholic religion have enjoyed in Maltese society and, the more time passes, it appears that Malta is moving in the footsteps of Western Europe of losing its religious character to substi- tute it with a more secular outlook. This is evident from the legislation surveyed in this paper which tends to inspire itself less for the making 1 Professor Kevin Aquilina is the Dean of the Faculty of Laws at the University of Malta.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Goods of the Church: ―By Virtue of His Office, Not Only Has Power Over the Universal Church, but Also Has Pre-Eminent Ordinary Power Over All Particular
    TEMPORAL GOODS OF THE CHURCH DECLINE OF FOREIGN AID AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE CHURCH’S MISSION IN TANZANIA IN THE LIGHT OF C. 1254 OF 1983 CODEX IURIS CANONICI WITH REFERENCE TO THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TANGA DISSERTATION For obtaining the Degree of Doctor of Theology presented to the Faculty of Catholic Theology Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck SUBMITTED TO The Delegate of the Vice-Rector for Studies and Students Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Guggenberger DIRECTED BY Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Rees SUBMITTED BY Sylvester Ludovick Nitunga Innsbruck, Mai 2015 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................. 6 Danksagung .......................................................................................................... 7 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................... 9 Abstract .............................................................................................................. 16 Abstract-Deutsch ............................................................................................... 17 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 19 1.1 Aim and Purpose of this Research ................................................................ 20 1.2 Scope of the Research ..................................................................................... 21 1.3 Expected Result of the Research ................................................................... 21 1.4 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • The Wars of the Roses
    Unit 5: The Fortress Church, Revolution, and the Industrial Age © Jason Asbell, 2019 Unit 5: The Fortress Church, Revolution, and the Industrial Age © Jason Asbell, 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvFl6UBZLv4 © Business Insider, 2015 © Jason Asbell, 2019 This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. © Jason Asbell, 2019 Unit 5: The Fortress Church, Revolution, and the Industrial Age © Jason Asbell, 2019 Alexander VII (7 April 1655 – 22 May 1667) Commissioned St. Peter’s Square Issued Sollicitudo Omnium Ecclesiarum establishing the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception (defined as dogma centuries later) Innocent XII (12 July 1691 – 27 Sep 1700) Issued Romanum decet Pontificem to stop nepotism Clement XI (23 Nov 1700 – 19 March 1721) Made Immaculate Conception a universal feast Innocent XIII (8 May 1721 – 7 March 1724) Ordered that no new members could be received into the Jesuits Issued Apostolici Ministerii to revive adoption of reforms of Trent, especially in Spain © Jason Asbell, 2019 All images public domain Benedict XIII (29 May 1724 – 21 Feb 1730) Repealed worldwide tobacco ban of Urban VII and Urban VIII Clement XII (12 July 1730 – 6 Feb 1740) Completed façade of St. John Lateran, commissioned Trevi fountain Issued In eminenti apostolatus against Freemasonry Clement XIV (19 May 1769 – 22 Sep 1774) Issued Dominus ac Redemptor to suppress the Jesuits Pius VI (15 February 1775 – 29 Aug 1799) Condemned the French Revolution, expelled from Rome by French troops from 1798 until his death Six-month sede vacante period until Pius VII elected © Jason Asbell, 2019 All images public domain Pius VII (14 March 1800 – 20 Aug 1823) Present at (but did not preside over) coronation of Napoleon in December 1804 Expelled from the Papal States by French from 1809 to 1814 Ended suppression of the Jesuits Leo XIII (20 February 1878 – 20 July 1903) First Pope to fully embrace role of Mary as mediatrix, promoted rosary and scapular Supported rights of working classes but opposed Communism St.
    [Show full text]