Towards Possessive Sentences Classification in English – the Preliminary Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Linguistics and Literature Studies 1(1): 37-42, 2013 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2013.010106 Towards Possessive Sentences Classification in English – The Preliminary Study V.A. Yatsko*, T.S. Yatsko Katanov State University of Khakasia *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2013 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract The paper focuses on the structure of puck; also: an instance of having such control (as in football); predicative possessive constructions described in terms of 2) something owned, occupied, or controlled: property [4]. semantic features distinguished within scope of predication Christian Lehmann [5 p. 7] notes that control of the analysis, viz. causative, agentive, inchoative, egressive, possessum by the possessor is the default assumption and continuative, and stative features. Features that are in insofar the default interpretation of the possessive relation. complementary distribution yield contaminated forms of Such an interpretation excludes from the present analysis possessive constructions: inchoative-causative, sentences, in which X and Y are non-human, see (1) below, as inchoative-agentive, egressive-causative, egressive-agentive, continuative-causative, continuative-agentive. Causative well as sentences expressing family relations: *Nichols has a possessive constructions are taken to be basic since their brother, but he is not a twin. According to a broader structure corresponds to the structure of the prototypical approach possession is treated as a relational concept that situation while the other ones are derived from them by covers relations between persons and their body parts and omission of appropriate semantic features. The structure of products, between persons and their kin, between persons causative possessive sentences is described in terms of and their material belongings, between persons and things componential analysis. they control over, etc. [2 p. 1]. Keywords Possessive Sentences, Predication Analysis, 3. In English the category of possession is manifested on Classification, Causative Semantics, Prototypical Situation different levels of language system. On the morphological level it is realized by the 's (*the Winchester rifle is Alison's); on the lexical level it is expressed by means of possessive verbs, nouns, pronouns, and adjectives with possessive 1. Introduction meaning (own, possess, property); on the syntactic level it is expressed by noun phrases (*They hear a HORN HONKING, In contemporary linguistics possession is regarded as one and turn just as Ben 's car comes flying past them) and of the main categories investigated in a significant number of predicative constructions, in which the possessive relation is works. Summarizing their contents we distinguish the lexicalized in possessive verbs, e.g. *Her mother used to following specific features of the linguistic category of possession. drive her everywhere, and now Alyssa has a car. 1. Possession represents relationship between two entities, According to the way of expressing the category of manifested by the schematic structure X POSS Y, where X possession on the syntactic level languages are divided into and Y are nominal expressions referred to as 'possessor' and Habeo-languages having special possessive verbs, which 'possessee' (or 'possessum') [1 p. 2, 2]. The semantics of take a direct object, and Esso-languages, which have no possessive constructions involves referential characteristics possessive verbs, and in which the idea of possession is of the possessor, the possessee and the possessive relation expressed by the constructions with the verb be [6]. English holding between them (3 p. 2). is a typical Habeo-language since it has a number of 2. The essential feature of the possessive relation is control possessive verbs. that possessor (X) exercises over possessee (Y). Peter Willemse, Kristine Davidse and Liesbet Heyvaert [7] Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary gives the following argue that proper interpretation of possessum's referent definitions of possession: 1) a: the act of having or taking requires analysis of discourse context in which into control; b: control or occupancy of property without corresponding NPs occur thus adding a discourse dimension regard to ownership c: ownership; d: control of the ball or to the study of the category of possession. 38 Towards Possessive Sentences Classification in English – The Preliminary Study Linguistic studies of the category of possession usually the domain of alienable possession and reveal some factors differentiate between nominal possessives and clausal that influence the intensity of possessive semantics and possessives [8]. This paper will concentrate on predicative determine its gradational character. possessive constructions since they have been less The examples of predicative constructions were taken investigated and there is need in new methodologies for their from the Corpus of Contemporary American English [11] analysis. (these are marked with an asterisk) and the British National 4. Linguistic investigations of the category of possession Corpus (marked with double asterisk) [12]. Both corpora are have been focused on developing the taxonomy of available online, which makes it possible to easily verify possessive constructions, characterization of their types and presented data and their analysis. subtypes. John R. Taylor [1 p. 6] provides evidence that the first such taxonomy was created by H. Poutsma in the work dated as early as 1914. Since that time a number of 2. Predication Analysis taxonomies have been created that take into account The term "predication analysis" was introduced by Laurel semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic characteristics of X, Y and Brinton [13 pp. 276-287]. Depending on the distribution of POSS. As we showed earlier [9] the taxonomies have been semantic features of predicates Brinton distinguishes developed within scopes of two approaches. The taxonomic between stative, inchoative, continuative, egressive, approach is based on the principle of a univocal causative, and agentive sentences. Stative predicates and correspondence between the linguistic form and content: any sentences denote an unchanging condition whereas construction that contains lexical and grammatical inchoative sentences denote a change in state or the manifestations of possession is considered possessive. The beginning of a new state. Causative sentences denote restrictive approach holds that lexical and grammatical something effecting a change of state in an entity, and possessive markers can express not only possessive meaning agentive sentences involve a human agent who intentionally but also other types of meaning such as existence or location. and volitionally brings about a change in state in an entity. For example (1) within scope of the taxonomic approach The end or cessation of a state is termed egressive while will be regarded as a possessive sentence (since it features continuative sentences express a continuation of a state. the possessive marker has) while according to the restrictive Stative predicates and sentences are assumed to be basic, approach being possessive in form it is existential by its being analyzed with the stative feature BE; other types of nature. sentences are formed by adding additional semantic features. (1) *The house has several bedrooms In inchoative sentences the predicates are analyzed with the Existential semantics of (1) can be revealed by application stative feature plus an additional inchoative feature COME; of interrogation test, cf.: Are there bedrooms in the house? - causative sentences are distinguished by the additional Yes, the house has several bedrooms. Existential nature of feature CAUSE while the nature of agentive sentences can the sentence is clearly indicated by There + be construction. be represented by the agentive feature DO. Egressive and Other tests used to detect the semantics of possessive continative predicates can be analyzed with COME NEG and constructions include transposition of X and Y; substitution; NEG COME NEG features (ibid pp. 277-281). insertion; deletion; transformation of predicative Brinton's predication analysis is evidently based on the constructions into non-predicative and vice versa. These ideas earlier formulated by David Dowty [14] who tests correspond to those ones used in transformational distinguished between DO, BECOME, CAUSE operators to grammar as constituency tests [10 pp. 24-33). describe the meaning of four verb classes expressing state, Another assumption underlying the restrictive approach is achievement, activity, and accomplishment. Adding two that possessive semantics can vary in its intensity; in some more features BE and NEG allows getting six main predicate contexts it can be completely or partially neutralized. types and six contaminated types thus making up a powerful The aim of this paper is to suggest a novel approach to and flexible methodology for the explanation and description classification of possessive sentences based on predication of predicative constructions. analysis methodology. We will focus on the analysis of We think that Brinton's conception can be best explained causative sentences that, in our opinion, are prototypical to in terms of distributional analysis. Table 1. The distribution of semantic features of predicates Sta- Agen- Egres- Semantic features Inchoa-tive Causa-tive Continua-tive tive tive sive Stative 0 + 0 0 0 0 Inchoa- + 0 – – 0 0 tive Causative 0 – 0 + – – Agentive 0 – + 0 –