CAPTIVE BREEDING and HUSBANDRY of Abronia Graminea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Ecology of Lizard Reproductive Output
Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2011) ••, ••–•• RESEARCH The ecology of lizard reproductive PAPER outputgeb_700 1..11 Shai Meiri1*, James H. Brown2 and Richard M. Sibly3 1Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, ABSTRACT 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Department of Biology, Aim We provide a new quantitative analysis of lizard reproductive ecology. Com- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA and Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde parative studies of lizard reproduction to date have usually considered life-history Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA, 3School components separately. Instead, we examine the rate of production (productivity of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, hereafter) calculated as the total mass of offspring produced in a year. We test ReadingRG6 6AS, UK whether productivity is influenced by proxies of adult mortality rates such as insularity and fossorial habits, by measures of temperature such as environmental and body temperatures, mode of reproduction and activity times, and by environ- mental productivity and diet. We further examine whether low productivity is linked to high extinction risk. Location World-wide. Methods We assembled a database containing 551 lizard species, their phyloge- netic relationships and multiple life history and ecological variables from the lit- erature. We use phylogenetically informed statistical models to estimate the factors related to lizard productivity. Results Some, but not all, predictions of metabolic and life-history theories are supported. When analysed separately, clutch size, relative clutch mass and brood frequency are poorly correlated with body mass, but their product – productivity – is well correlated with mass. The allometry of productivity scales similarly to metabolic rate, suggesting that a constant fraction of assimilated energy is allocated to production irrespective of body size. -
Intrasexual Selection Predicts the Evolution of Signal Complexity in Lizards Terry J
doi 10.1098/rspb.2000.1417 Intrasexual selection predicts the evolution of signal complexity in lizards Terry J. Ord1*,DanielT.Blumstein1,2,3 and Christopher S. Evans2 1Department of Biological Sciences, and 2Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 3Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA Sexual selection has often been invoked in explaining extravagant morphological and behavioural adap- tations that function to increase mating success. Much is known about the e¡ects of intersexual selection, which operates through female mate choice, in shaping animal signals. The role of intrasexual selection has been less clear. We report on the ¢rst evidence for the coevolution of signal complexity and sexual size dimorphism (SSD), which is characteristically produced by high levels of male^male competition. We used two complementary comparative methods in order to reveal that the use of complex signals is asso- ciated with SSD in extant species and that historical increases in complexity have occurred in regions of a phylogenetic tree characterized by high levels of pre-existing size dimorphism. We suggest that signal complexity has evolved in order to improve opponent assessment under conditions of high male^male competition. Our ¢ndings suggest that intrasexual selection may play an important and previously under- estimated role in the evolution of communicative systems. Keywords: sexual selection; sexual size dimorphism; visual communication; signal complexity; evolution; the comparative method In many taxa, competition between males over 1. INTRODUCTION resources characteristically produces an asymmetry in The extraordinary diversity of animal signals has body size between the sexes. -
A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus
JEZ Mde 2035 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY (MOL DEV EVOL) 291:339–353 (2001) A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus JANE MELVILLE,* JAMES A. SCHULTE II, AND ALLAN LARSON Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 ABSTRACT We present phylogenetic analyses of the lizard genus Ctenophorus using 1,639 aligned positions of mitochondrial DNA sequences containing 799 parsimony-informative charac- ters for samples of 22 species of Ctenophorus and 12 additional Australian agamid genera. Se- quences from three protein-coding genes (ND1, ND2, and COI) and eight intervening tRNA genes are examined using both parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses. Species of Ctenophorus form a monophyletic group with Rankinia adelaidensis, which we suggest placing in Ctenophorus. Ecological differentiation among species of Ctenophorus is most evident in the kinds of habitats used for shelter. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the ancestral condition is to use burrows for shelter, and that habits of sheltering in rocks and shrubs/hummock grasses represent separately derived conditions. Ctenophorus appears to have undergone extensive cladogenesis approximately 10–12 million years ago, with all three major ecological modes being established at that time. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291:339–353, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The agamid lizard genus Ctenophorus provides ecological categories based on whether species abundant opportunity for a molecular phylogenetic shelter in rocks, burrows, or vegetation. Eight spe- study of speciation and ecological diversification. cies of Ctenophorus are associated with rocks: C. Agamid lizards show a marked radiation in Aus- caudicinctus, C. decresii, C. fionni, C. -
A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS -
Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective
Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget. -
Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia Julie Rej East Tennessee State University
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia Julie Rej East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Paleontology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Rej, Julie, "Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3210. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3210 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Julie Rej May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven Wallace Dr. Chris Widga Keywords: Agamidae, Pogona, Ctenophorus, Tympanocryptis, Hastings Cave, Horseshoe Cave, Western Australia, Squamata, Late Quaternary ABSTRACT Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia by Julie Rej Fossil Agamidae from Western Australia have been the subject of limited study. To aid in fossil agamid identification, Hocknull (2002) examined the maxilla and dentary of several extant species from Australia and determined diagnostic characters for various species groups. In the study here, fossil agamids from two localities in Western Australia, Hastings Cave and Horseshoe Cave, were examined, grouped, and identified to the lowest unambiguous taxonomic level. -
Why Are Females Ornamented? a Test of the Courtship Stimulation and Courtship Rejection Hypotheses
Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arp136 Advance Access publication 22 October 2009 Why are females ornamented? A test of the courtship stimulation and courtship rejection hypotheses Rita Chan,a Devi Stuart-Fox,a and Tim S. Jessopb aDepartment of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia and bDepartment of Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia Female ornamentation was initially thought to reflect genetic correlation with the more elaborate male trait. However, this cannot explain female-specific ornamentation, such as the conspicuous coloration displayed by females of many species during breeding. Females may exhibit distinctive, reproductive coloration to 1) advertise receptivity and stimulate male courtship or 2) advertise nonreceptivity when gravid to reduce male courtship, harassment, and potentially costly copulations. We tested both hypotheses in the Lake Eyre dragon lizard (Ctenophorus maculosus) by quantifying female coloration, using spectroradiometry and a model of lizard color perception, and male and female behavior across the female reproductive cycle. Females develop bright orange coloration on their throat and abdomen during the breeding season, whereas males remain cryptically colored. The onset of orange coloration was associated with enlarging follicles, acceptance of copulations, and escalation of male courtship. Rather than fading once females were no longer receptive, however, the intense orange coloration remained until oviposition. Further- more, despite maximal coloration associated with nonreceptivity, males persisted with courtship and copulation attempts, and females increased rejection behaviors comprising lateral displays and flipping onto their backs (to prevent forced intromission), both of which emphasize the conspicuous ventrolateral coloration. These apparently costly rejection behaviors did not reduce male harassment but did decrease the frequency of potentially costly copulations. -
Cranial Osteology of Moloch Horridus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae)
Records of the Western Australian Museum 25: 201–237 (2009). Cranial osteology of Moloch horridus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) Christopher J. Bell1, Jim I. Mead2 and Sandra L. Swift2 1Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geosciences, Box 70357, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614 USA. E-mails: [email protected] & [email protected] Correspondence to: Christopher J. Bell; [email protected] Abstract – We provide a detailed description of the cranial and mandibular osteology of the Australian agamid lizard, Moloch horridus, based on a series of eight skeletal preparations and minimal preparation of a single specimen preserved in alcohol. Articulated and disarticulated material permits the de- scription of individual elements and their articulations, and a preliminary assessment of patterns of cranial and mandibular variation within Moloch. Preliminary comparisons of osteological features of Moloch with those of other Australian agamids indicate that many elements of the skull and mandible of Moloch have specialized morphology. Basic knowledge of patterns of skeletal variation within and among Australian agamids is insufficiently established at present to permit reliable hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships based only on morphology. A paucity of adequate skeletal collections exacerbates the chal- lenges of elucidating patterns of evolutionary morphology for the group as a whole. Nevertheless, our preliminary assessment suggests that at least the max- illa, parietal, pterygoid, supraoccipital, prootic, otooccipital, basioccipital, den- tary, coronoid, and articular-prearticular of Moloch can be clearly distinguished from those of other Australian agamids, and probably can be used to develop a reliable and more comprehensive skeletal morphological diagnosis for Moloch. -
Australian Society of Herpetolgists Species List Of
Australian Society of Herpetolgists Species List of Australian Amphibians and Reptiles - 20 December 2016 Partial list (amphibians, dragons, geckos, turtles and crocodilians) Group Family/Subfamily Genus/Species Subspecies Author Comments Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) Adelotus (1 sp.) Ogilby, 1907 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) A. brevis (Günther, 1863) Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) Heleioporus (6 spp.) Gray, 1841 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) H. albopunctatus Gray, 1841 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) H. australiacus (Shaw & Nodder, 1795) Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) H. barycragus Lee, 1967 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) H. eyrei (Gray, 1845) Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) H. inornatus Lee & Main, 1954 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) H. psammophilus Lee & Main, 1954 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) Lechriodus (1 sp.) Boulenger, 1882 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) L. fletcheri (Boulenger, 1890) Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) Limnodynastes (11 spp, 15 taxa) Fitzinger, 1843 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) L. convexiusculus (Macleay, 1877) Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) L. depressus Tyler, 1976 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) L. dorsalis (Gray, 1841) Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) L. dumerilii Limnodynastes dumerilii dumerilii Peters, 1863 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE (40 spp) L. dumerilii Limnodynastes dumerilii fryi Martin, 1972 Amphibians-frogs LIMNODYNASTIDAE -
Supplementary Materials For
Supplementary Materials for Reptile-like physiology in Early Jurassic stem-mammals Authors: Elis Newham1*, Pamela G. Gill2,3*, Philippa Brewer3, Michael J. Benton2, Vincent Fernandez4,5, Neil J. Gostling6, David Haberthür7, Jukka Jernvall8, Tuomas Kankanpää9, Aki Kallonen10, Charles Navarro2, Alexandra Pacureanu5, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff11, Kelly Richards12, Kate Robson-Brown13, Philipp Schneider14, Heikki Suhonen10, Paul Tafforeau5, Katherine Williams14, & Ian J. Corfe8*. Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods Supplementary Text Figs. S1 to S5 Tables S1 to S5 1 Materials and Methods Choice of fossil specimens. All Morganucodon and Kuehneotherium specimens are from the Early Jurassic St Brides Island fissure suite, from Glamorgan, South Wales, UK (1, 44). The two genera co-existed on a small landmass during the Early Jurassic marine transgression (Hettangian-early Sinemurian, ~200 Ma) (45). Thousands of their bones and teeth were washed into karst fissures that have subsequently been revealed by quarrying. The Morganucodon and Kuehneotherium specimens used for cementum analysis are from the Natural History Museum, London, UK (NHMUK) and Morganucodon femora specimens from the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, UK (UMZC). Morganucodon specimens are Morganucodon watsoni from Pontalun 3 fissure in Pontalun quarry (now Lithalun), excavated in 1962-1963 (44, 45). Kuehneotherium specimens are from three Glamorgan fissures in Pontalun and Pant quarries; Pontalun 3, Pant 2 and Pant 4. Although the Pant 2 Kuehneotherium collection is more extensive, teeth are poorly mineralized and so produced relatively fewer usable increment counts. Pontalun 3 and Pant 2 fissures have a relatively impoverished fauna, and Pant 4 has a more diverse biota (45). -
PUBLIC OFFICER:- R Longmore (1983-2007).; Scott Keogh (2008-)
THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 43 History of Office Bearers Formation Committee (April 1964):- MJ Littlejohn (Convenor); State Reps IR Straughan (Qld), FJ Mitchell (SA), HG Cogger (NSW), G Storr (WA), RE Barwick (ACT), JW Warren (Vic), AK Lee (Editor). First AGM (23 August 1965):- President MJ Littlejohn, Vice-President NG Stephenson, Secretary-Treasurer AA Martin, Asst Secretary-Treasurer KJ Wilson, Ordinary Members FJ Mitchell and IR Straughan, Editor AK Lee. PRESIDENT:- MJ Littlejohn (1965-69); AK Lee (1969-70); HG Cogger (1971-73); J de Bavay (1974); H Heat- wole (1975-76); GC Grigg (1976-77); MJ Tyler (1978-79); GF Watson (1979-81); AA Martin (1981-82); RS Seymour (1982-83); R Shine (1983-84); GC Grigg (1984-86); J Coventry (1986-87); RE Barwick (1987-88); J Covacevich (1988-91); M Davies (1991-92); R Shine (1992-94); A Georges (1994-6); D. Roberts (1996-98); M Bull (1998-9); R Swain (1999-2001); Sharon Downes (2001-03); J Melville (2004-2005); Dr Jean-Marc Hero (2005-2007); P Doherty (2007-2008); M Thompson (2008-) VICE-PRESIDENT:- NG Stephenson (1965-67); RE Barwick (1967-69); HG Cogger (1969-70); MJ Littlejohn (1971-72); MJ Tyler (1973); HG Cogger (1974); J de Bavay (1975-76); H Heatwole (1976-77); GC Grigg (1977-79); MJ Tyler (1979-80); GF Watson (1981-82); AA Martin (1982-83); RS Seymour (1983-84); R Shine (1984-86); GC Grigg (1986-87); J Coventry (1987-88); RE Barwick (1988-91); J Covacevich (1991-92); M Davies (1992-94); R. Shine (1994-6); A Georges (1996-98); D Roberts (1998-99); M Bull(1999-2001); R Swain (2001-2003); S Downes (2004-5); J Melville (2005-2007); J-M Hero (2007-2008); P Doherty (2008-) SECRETARY/TREASURER:- AA Martin (1965-67); GF Watson (1967-72); LA Moffatt (1973-75); J Caughley (1975-76); RWG Jenkins (1976-77); M Davies (1978-83); G Courtice (1983-87); J Wombey (1987-99); S Ke- ogh (1999-2003); N Mitchell (2004-5). -
Herpetology, Fourth Edition Pough • Andrews • Crump • Savitzky • Wells • Brandley
Herpetology, Fourth Edition Pough • Andrews • Crump • Savitzky • Wells • Brandley Literature Cited Abdala V, Manzano AS, Nieto L, Diogo R. 2009. Comparative myology of Leiosauridae (Squamata) and its bearing on their phylogenetic relationships. Belgian Journal of Zoology 139: 109–123. [4] Abts MA. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the chuckwalla. Ecological Monographs 57: 215–232. [16] Adalsteinsson SA, Branch WR, Trape S, Vitt LJ, Hedges SB. 2009. Molecular phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of snakes of the family Leptotyphlopidae (Reptilia, Squamata). Zootaxa 2244: 1–50. [4] Adams MJ. 1993. Summer nests of the tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) from the Oregon coast range. Northwestern Naturalist 74: 15–18. [3] Ade CM, Boone MD, Puglis HJ. 2010. Effects of an insecticide and potential predators on green frogs and northern cricket frogs. Journal of Herpetology 44: 591–600. [17] Adkins-Regan E, Reeve HK. 2014. Sexual dimorphism in body size and the origin of sex- determination systems. American Naturalist 183: 519–536. [9] Aerts P, Van Damme R, D’Août K, Van Hooydonck B. 2003. Bipedalism in lizards: Whole-body modelling reveals a possible spandrel. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 358: 1525–1533. [10] Afacan NJ, Yeung ATY, Pena OM, Hancock REW. 2012. Therapeutic potential of host defense peptides in antibiotic-resistant infections. Current Pharmaceutical Design 18: 807–819. [1] Agarwal I, Dutta-Roy A, Bauer AM, Giri VB. 2012. Rediscovery of Geckoella jeyporensis (Squamata: Gekkonidae), with notes on morphology, coloration and habitat. Hamadryad 36: 17–24 [17] Agassiz L. 1857. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America, Vol.