DOCSLIB.ORG

Focusing on the Landscape a Report for Caring for Our Country

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Focusing on the Landscape a Report for Caring for Our Country Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System Part A: Fauna A Report for Caring for Our Country Prepared by Industry and Investment, New South Wales Forest Science Centre, Forest & Rangeland Ecosystems. PO Box 100, Beecroft NSW 2119 Australia. 1 Table of Contents Figures.......................................................................................................................................2 Tables........................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................5 Introduction...............................................................................................................................8 Methods.....................................................................................................................................9 Results and Discussion ...........................................................................................................14 References.............................................................................................................................194 Appendix 1 Vertebrate summary .........................................................................................196 Appendix 2 Invertebrate summary.......................................................................................197 Figures Figure 1. Location of protected areas within the Australian Protected Area Network (taken from http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/nrs/science/locations.html). 10 Tables Table 1 Summary of vertebrate taxa in the National Reserve System (NRS). Well Reserved = >45% of Record Sites within PAs; Under Reserved = <10% Record Sites within PAs Large PAs = PAs larger than 1000ha........................................................................................7 Table 2 Summary of invertebrate taxa in the NRS – Codes as for Table 1. ...........................7 Table 3 Area of IUCN category reserved lands within each state of Australia (http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/nrs/science/capad/2006/index.html) ........................10 Table 4 Codes for location distributions ...............................................................................12 Table 5 Vegetation type codes ..............................................................................................12 Table 6 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC) threatened status codes .............................................................................................................................12 Table 7 Codes for more detailed location distributions ........................................................13 Table 8a Anuran species considered extinct .........................................................................14 Table 8b List of anuran species with 30 records or fewer in the ANHAT database. Species in bold are listed as threatened under the EPBC Act. .............................................................14 Table 9 Species of anurans with > 45% of record sites in PAs..............................................15 Table 10 Species of anurans with <10% of record sites within PAs.....................................16 Table 11 List of anuran species recorded from more than 100 PAs .....................................17 Table 12 List of anuran species recorded from fewer than five PAs ....................................18 Table 13 Mammal species considered extinct.......................................................................19 Table 14 Mammal species which account for almost 50% of the total species records in ANHAT...................................................................................................................................20 Table 15 Mammal species with 30 or fewer individual site records in the ANHAT database. .................................................................................................................................................20 Table 16 Mammal species with >45% of site records within the NRS.................................21 Table 17 Mammal species with <10% of ANHAT records located within the NRS............23 Table 18 Mammal species recorded at more than 100 PAs. .................................................23 Table 19 Mammal species recorded from five or fewer PAs................................................25 2 Table 20 Mammal species recorded in five or fewer PAs greater than 1000 hectares. ........26 Table 21 Reptile species that account for approximately 50% of the total species records in ANHAT...................................................................................................................................27 Table 22 Reptile species with 30 or fewer individual site records in the ANHAT database. .................................................................................................................................................28 Table 23 Reptile species with >45% of site records within PAs. .........................................33 Table 24 Reptile species with <10% of ANHAT records located within the NRS. .............37 Table 25 Reptile species recorded at more than 100 PAs. ....................................................38 Table 26 Reptile species recorded from five or fewer PAs...................................................40 Table 27 Reptile species recorded in five or fewer PAs greater than 1000 hectares. ...........42 Table 28 Non-passerine species considered extinct..............................................................45 Table 29 Non-passerine species that account for approximately 50% of the total species records in ANHAT..................................................................................................................45 Table 30 Non-passerine species with 30 or fewer individual site records in the ANHAT database...................................................................................................................................46 Table 31 Non-passerine species with >45% of site records within PAs...............................46 Table 32 Non-passerine species with <10% of ANHAT records located within PAs..........47 Table 33 Non-passerine species recorded at more than 100 PAs..........................................48 Table 34 Non-passerine species recorded from five or fewer PAs. ......................................51 Table 35 Non-passerine species recorded in five or fewer PAs greater than 1000 hectares.52 Table 36 Passerine species that account for almost 50% of the total species records in ANHAT...................................................................................................................................53 Table 37 Passerine species with 30 or fewer site records in the ANHAT database..............54 Table 38 Passerine species with 45% or more of their record sites in PAs. .........................54 Table 39 Passerine species with <10% of ANHAT records located within the NRS...........55 Table 40 Passerine species recorded at more than 100 PAs..................................................56 Table 41 Passerine species recorded from five or fewer PAs. ..............................................60 Table 42 Passerine species recorded in five or fewer PAs greater than 1000 hectares.........60 Table 43 Dragonfly and damselfly species that account for approximately 50% of the total species records in ANHAT. ....................................................................................................61 Table 44 Dragonfly and damselfly species with 10 or fewer individual site records in the ANHAT database....................................................................................................................62 Table 45 Dragonfly and damselfly species with >45% of site records within the NRS. ......65 Table 46 Dragonfly and damselfly species with <10% of ANHAT records located within the NRS...................................................................................................................................66 Table 47 Dragonfly and damselfly species recorded at more than 50 PAs...........................67 Table 48 Dragonfly and damselfly species with records in five or fewer PAs and PAs of 1000 ha or more. .....................................................................................................................67 Table 49 Butterfly species that account for approximately 50% of the total species records in ANHAT...............................................................................................................................70 Table 50 Butterfly species with 10 or fewer individual site records in the ANHAT database. .................................................................................................................................................71 Table 51 Butterfly species with greater than 45% of site records within the NRS...............73 Table 52 Butterfly species with <10% of ANHAT records located within the NRS............75 Table 53 Butterfly species recorded at more than 100 PAs. .................................................77 Table 54 Butterfly species recorded from five or fewer PAs and five or fewer PAs larger than 1000 hectares...................................................................................................................77
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dragonfly Survey Report
    Moorebank Precinct West Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Part 4, Division 4.1, State Significant Development September 2016 TACTICAL GROUP MOOREBANK PRECINCT WEST Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Author Adam Costenoble Checker Kate Carroll Approver Ketan Patel Report No 001 Date 26/09/2016 Revision Text Final This report has been prepared for Tactical Group in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for AA009335 dated July 2016. Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. REVISIONS Prepared Approved Revision Date Description by by Adam 001 26/09/16 For submission to DPI Fisheries Ketan Patel Costenoble V i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Aims of this Report ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Consultation .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Five New Species of the Open-Holed Trapdoor Spider Genus Aname
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 35 010–038 (2020) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.35.2020.010-038 Five new species of the open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Anamidae) from Western Australia, with a revised generic placement for Aname armigera Mark S. Harvey1,2, Karl Gruber2, Mia J. Hillyer1 and Joel A. Huey1,2,3,4 1 Collections and Research, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia. 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 3 Adjunct, School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia. 4 Present address: Biologic Environmental Survey, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 is widely distributed throughout Australia, and currently contains 44 named species. Using a combination of morphological and molecular data, we describe fve new species from the Wheatbelt, Mid-west and Goldfelds regions of Western Australia: A. exulans sp. nov., A. lillianae sp. nov., A. mccleeryorum sp. nov., A. phillipae sp. nov. and A. simoneae sp. nov. The female holotype of Aname armigera Rainbow and Pulleine, 1918 from near Mullewa was examined and found to belong to the genus Proshermacha Simon forming the new combination P. armigera (Rainbow and Pulleine, 1918), comb. nov. KEYWORDS: taxonomy, systematics, molecular phylogenetics urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98828964-6150-465D-B5AE-1480DA0D454E INTRODUCTION Castalanelli, Framenau, Huey and Harvey, 2020, a The open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname species from Western Australia recently described in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam's Emerald Dragonfly
    Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly - Archaeophya adamsi December 2013, Primefact 187, Third edition Fisheries Ecosystems Unit, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute Description The Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly (also called Horned Urfly) is a moderately large, robust Dragonfly. Larvae grow to about 23mm in length and have a large two-lobed frontal plate on the head (see Figure 1), which distinguishes them from any other species found in NSW. The adults have a brown-black body with yellow markings, and a slight green or bluish metallic reflection on some parts. The abdomen length is around 46 mm and wingspan around 75 mm. Habitat and ecology Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly larvae have been Figure 1: Adult Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly (Photo: found in narrow, shaded riffle zones with CSIRO Entomology) and larva (Photo: J. Hawking, moss and abundant riparian vegetation (often Line drawing: G. Theischinger) closed canopy) in small to moderate sized creeks with gravel or sandy bottoms. Introduction All dragonflies are predatory. The larvae stalk or ambush aquatic prey while the adults The Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly (Archaeophya capture prey while flying. adamsi Fraser) is one of Australia’s rarest Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly larvae may live, in dragonflies. Only a small number of adults have particular cases, up to 7 years and undergo ever been collected, and the species is only various moults before metamorphosing into known from a few sites in the greater Sydney adults. Adults are thought to live for a few region. Some remaining areas of habitat are months at most. under threat from urban, industrial and agricultural development.
    [Show full text]
  • Runningpostman Newsletter of the Private Land Conservation Program
    The RunningPostman Newsletter of the Private Land Conservation Program April 2009 Building partnerships with landowners for the sustainable management Issue 4 and conservation of natural values across the landscape. ISSN 1835-6141 Department of The Running Postman • April 2009 Primary Industries and Water 1 2 The Running In Postman this Our newsletter is named after Issue a small twining plant that is widespread in Tasmanian dry forests (Kennedia prostrata). Message from the Program Manager 3 The Running Postman is published Living in a shared house, every action has a reaction 4 three times per year, and circulated Managing habitat for wildlife in privately owned reserves 5 to all the participants in the various Private Land Conservation Native grasslands - more than just grass 6 Program (PLCP) initiatives, as well Balancing conservation and production: A landowner’s perspective 7 as other interested groups and individuals. Creating bandicoot habitat - conservation in captivity 8 The PLCP Conservation Covenant Habitat for threatened species - the butterfly Chaostola skipper 9 partners, Land for Wildlife Protecting habitat - saving species 10 members, and signatories Log on and get more for your land 11 to Vegetation Management Agreements now extends to AGFEST 2009 12 over 1000 people. These people Protected Areas on Private Land Program 12 range from graziers and farmers Selling Property 12 with extensive operations in the Midlands, through to people with ten hectare bush blocks on the fringes of Hobart, with just about everything in between. More information regarding the PLCP (and an electronic version of The Running Postman) can be found on the Department of Primary Industries and Water The Running Postman is printed on Monza Satin recycled paper, derived from website: sustainable forests, elemental chlorine free pulp and certified environmental systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010–2011
    Australian Museum 2010–2011 Report Annual Australian Museum Annual Report 2010–2011 Australian Museum Annual Report 2010 – 2011 ii Australian Museum Annual Report 2010 –11 The Australian Museum Annual Report 2010 –11 Availability is published by the Australian Museum Trust, This annual report has been designed for accessible 6 College Street Sydney NSW 2010. online use and distribution. A limited number of copies have been printed for statutory purposes. © Australian Museum Trust 2011 This report is available at: ISSN 1039-4141 www.australianmuseum.net.au/Annual-Reports. Editorial Further information on the research and education Project management: Wendy Rapee programs and services of the Australian Museum Editing and typesetting: Brendan Atkins can be found at www.australianmuseum.net.au. Proofreading: Lindsay Taaffe Design and production: Australian Museum Environmental responsibility Design Studio Printed on Sovereign Offset, an FSC- certified paper from responsibly grown fibres, made under an All photographs © Australian Museum ISO 14001– accredited environmental management 2011, unless otherwise indicated. system and without the use of elemental chlorine. Contact Australian Museum 6 College Street Sydney NSW 2010 Open daily 9.30 am – 5.00 pm t 02 9320 6000 f 02 9320 6050 e [email protected] w www.australianmuseum.net.au www.facebook.com/australianmuseum www.twitter.com/austmus www.youtube.com/austmus front cover: The Museum's after-hours program, Jurassic Lounge, attracted a young adult audience to enjoy art, music and new ideas. Photo Stuart Humphreys. iii Minister The Hon. George Souris, MP and Minister for the Arts Governance The Museum is governed by a Trust established under the Australian Museum Trust Act 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Interesting <I>Laboulbeniales</I> From
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2014. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/129.439 Volume 129(2), pp. 439–454 October–December 2014 New and interesting Laboulbeniales from southern and southeastern Asia D. Haelewaters1* & S. Yaakop2 1Farlow Reference Library and Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Harvard University 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A. 2Faculty of Science & Technology, School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Two new species of Laboulbenia from the Philippines are described and illustrated: Laboulbenia erotylidarum on an erotylid beetle (Coleoptera, Erotylidae) and Laboulbenia poplitea on Craspedophorus sp. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In addition, we present ten new records of Laboulbeniales from several countries in southern and southeastern Asia on coleopteran hosts. These are Blasticomyces lispini from Borneo (Indonesia), Cantharomyces orientalis from the Philippines, Dimeromyces rugosus on Leiochrodes sp. from Sumatra (Indonesia), Laboulbenia anoplogenii on Clivina sp. from India, L. cafii on Remus corallicola from Singapore, L. satanas from the Philippines, L. timurensis on Clivina inopaca from Papua New Guinea, Monoicomyces stenusae on Silusa sp. from the Philippines, Ormomyces clivinae on Clivina sp. from India, and Peyritschiella princeps on Philonthus tardus from Lombok (Indonesia). Key words — Ascomycota, insect-associated fungi, morphology, museum collection study, Roland Thaxter, taxonomy Introduction One group of microscopic insect-associated parasitic fungi, the order Laboulbeniales (Ascomycota, Pezizomycotina, Laboulbeniomycetes), is perhaps the most intriguing and yet least studied of all entomogenous fungi. Laboulbeniales are obligate parasites on invertebrate hosts, which include insects (mainly beetles and flies), millipedes, and mites.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg the Short Range-Endemics of the Pilbara Bioregion
    Appendix 3 Supporting Technical Studies Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Prepared for: Covalent Lithium January 2019 Final Report May 2017 Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6014 P: (08) 9285 8722 F: (08) 9285 8811 E: [email protected] ABN: 55 124 110 167 Report Number: 298 Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 31 May 2017 Final Stuart Halse Email 24 November 17 Final V2 Anton Mittra Email 14 January 2019 BEC_Mt Holland_SRE_final_V2_10i2019.docx This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd. i Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Covalent Lithium proposes to mine lithium at the Earl Grey deposit (the Proposal) approximately 100 km southeast of Southern Cross in Western Australia. This desktop review examines the likelihood that short-range endemic (SRE) invertebrates and listed terrestrial invertebrate species occur in the Proposal area and whether these species are likely to be impacted by proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Odonatological Abstract Service
    Odonatological Abstract Service published by the INTERNATIONAL DRAGONFLY FUND (IDF) in cooperation with the WORLDWIDE DRAGONFLY ASSOCIATION (WDA) Editors: Dr. Klaus Reinhardt, Dept Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. Tel. ++44 114 222 0105; E-mail: [email protected] Martin Schorr, Schulstr. 7B, D-54314 Zerf, Germany. Tel. ++49 (0)6587 1025; E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Milen Marinov, 7/160 Rossall Str., Merivale 8014, Christchurch, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] Published in Rheinfelden, Germany and printed in Trier, Germany. ISSN 1438-0269 years old) than old beaver ponds. These studies have 1997 concluded, based on waterfowl use only, that new bea- ver ponds are more productive for waterfowl than old 11030. Prejs, A.; Koperski, P.; Prejs, K. (1997): Food- beaver ponds. I tested the hypothesis that productivity web manipulation in a small, eutrophic Lake Wirbel, Po- in beaver ponds, in terms of macroinvertebrates and land: the effect of replacement of key predators on epi- water quality, declined with beaver pond succession. In phytic fauna. Hydrobiologia 342: 377-381. (in English) 1993 and 1994, fifteen and nine beaver ponds, respec- ["The effect of fish removal on the invertebrate fauna tively, of three different age groups (new, mid-aged, old) associated with Stratiotes aloides was studied in a shal- were sampled for invertebrates and water quality to low, eutrophic lake. The biomass of invertebrate preda- quantify differences among age groups. No significant tors was approximately 2.5 times higher in the inverte- differences (p < 0.05) were found in invertebrates or brate dominated year (1992) than in the fish-dominated water quality among different age classes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Natural Values Within the 2013 Extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area
    A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Nature Conservation Report 2017/6 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Hobart A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Jayne Balmer, Jason Bradbury, Karen Richards, Tim Rudman, Micah Visoiu, Shannon Troy and Naomi Lawrence. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, September 2017 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (World Heritage Program). Australian Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Tasmanian or Australian Governments. ISSN 1441-0680 Copyright 2017 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Published by Natural Values Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph of Eucalyptus regnans tall forest in the Styx Valley: Rob Blakers Cite as: Balmer, J., Bradbury, J., Richards, K., Rudman, T., Visoiu, M., Troy, S. and Lawrence, N. 2017. A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Native Woodland Conservation Strategy and Action Plans
    ACT NATIVE WOODLAND CONSERVATION STRATEGY AND ACTION PLANS PART A 1 Produced by the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development © Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2019 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from: Director-General, Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, GPO Box 158, Canberra ACT 2601. Telephone: 02 6207 1923 Website: www.planning.act.gov.au Acknowledgment to Country We wish to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land we are meeting on, the Ngunnawal people. We wish to acknowledge and respect their continuing culture and the contribution they make to the life of this city and this region. Accessibility The ACT Government is committed to making its information, services, events and venues as accessible as possible. If you have difficulty reading a standard printed document and would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, such as large print, please phone Access Canberra on 13 22 81 or email the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate at [email protected] If English is not your first language and you require a translating and interpreting service, please phone 13 14 50. If you are deaf, or have a speech or hearing impairment, and need the teletypewriter service, please phone 13 36 77 and ask for Access Canberra on 13 22 81. For speak and listen users, please phone 1300 555 727 and ask for Canberra Connect on 13 22 81. For more information on these services visit http://www.relayservice.com.au PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CONTENTS VISION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Science for Saving Species Research Findings Factsheet Project 2.1
    Science for Saving Species Research findings factsheet Project 2.1 Butterflies on the brink: identifying the Australian butterflies most at risk of extinction In brief Background Terrestrial invertebrates and their Invertebrates are declining globally in high (greater than 30%) chance of habitats are increasingly threatened both diversity and abundance, with extinction. We also identified key by human disturbances, particularly potentially serious consequences threatening processes affecting habitat loss and fragmentation, for ecosystem functioning. Many these species (chiefly inappropriate invasive species, inappropriate fire Australian butterflies are imperilled fire regimes, habitat loss and regimes and climate change. or declining but few are listed fragmentation, invasive species and Continuing declines and extinctions for protection by legislation. climate change), and the research in native terrestrial invertebrate We identified the 26 Australian and management actions needed communities are likely to negatively butterflies at most immediate risk to save them. Mapping of the 26 affect ecosystem functioning. This is of extinction within a 20-year time butterflies’ distributions revealed that because invertebrates play a central frame. We found that one butterfly most are now found only in a single role in many ecological processes, is facing a greater than 90% chance state or territory and many occupy including pollination, herbivory, the of extinction in the next 20 years narrow ranges. Increased resourcing consumption of dead plant and (and may already be extinct), and and management intervention is animal matter, and nutrient cycling, four species have a moderate to required to avert future extinctions. as well as providing a good source of food for other animals. There is urgent need to explore the causes of these declines, and the implications for ecosystems and ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]