The Horticulturist and Journal of Rural Art and Rural Taste 1861-02
THE CENTRAL PARK. Che Central Park —Ho. J. N former articles we have criticised the close planting of the trees, &c.; in the present we propose to say something about the manner and character of the grouping. We had been led to conclude, from the promises made at the in- itiation of the work, that we should now be- hold somet! ing very ‘different from what meets the eye of the visitor. We were told by Mr. Olmsted that we should have an American park, something unique and imposing; instead of which we find copies of what we regard the worst features of European parks, as we find them described. By an American park was meant, of course, something grand and imposing, which “Oh we might have had, and may even still have. The expression, undoubtedly, related mainly to the character and disposition of the trees ; for in no other respect would it be in the least degree apposite. It was no doubt supposed, and very justly, too, that our own grand forests and woodlands, in their composition and individuality, would present a copy | worthy of being reproduced on a small scale. But do we find any thing like || this in the Central Park? Not in the least. There is not the smallest indi- , cation that any thing of the kind has been, or will be attempted. On the con- trary, the teachings of nature, in her grandest manifestations, have been ig- | nored, and stiff and meaningless forms, devoid of expression, have been | adopted in their stead. We regret that the actual condition of things at the || Park should render such criticisms necessary, and we indulge the hope that || such changes will hereafter be introduced as to disarm them.
[Show full text]