DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Full Reportpdf, 2.9 MB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Full Reportpdf, 2.9 MB VKM Report 2019: 17 Pest risk assessment of selected Epitrix species Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment VKM Report 2019: 17 Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) 2019:17 Pest risk assessment of selected Epitrix species Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 16.12.2020 ISBN: 978-82-8259-333-5 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 222 Skøyen N – 0213 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Epitrix pubescens (Udo Schmidt [CC BY-SA 2.0]) Suggested citation: VKM, Johan A. Stenberg, Daniel Flø, Lawrence Kirkendall, Paal Krokene, Beatrix Alsanius, Christer Magnusson, Mogens Nicolaisen, Iben M. Thomsen, Sandra A.I. Wright, Trond Rafoss (2019). Pest risk assessment of selected Epitrix species. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health. VKM report 2019:17, ISBN: 978-82-8259-333-5, ISSN: 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2019: 17 Pest risk assessment of selected Epitrix species Preparation of the opinion The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) appointed a project group to answer the mandate. The project group consisted of four VKM members and a project leader from the VKM secretariat. Two external referees commented on and reviewed the opinion. The VKM Panel on Plant Health evaluated and approved the final opinion. Authors of the opinion Members of the project group that contributed to the drafting of the opinion In alphabetical order after chair of the project group: Johan A. Stenberg – Chair of the project group and member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, P.O. Box 102, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden Daniel Flø – Member of the project group and project leader in the VKM secretariat. Affiliation: VKM. Lawrence Kirkendall – Member of the project group and member of the Panel on Alien Organisms and Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) University of Bergen, Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway Paal Krokene – Member of the project group and member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Division of Biotechnology and Plant Health, P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway Members of the Panel on Plant Health that contributed to the assessment and approval of the opinion In addition to Johan A. Stenberg, Lawrence Kirkendall and Paal Krokene, these are (in alphabetic order before the Panel Chair): Beatrix Alsanius – Member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden Christer Magnusson – Member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Division of Biotechnology and Plant Health VKM Report 2019: 17 Viruses, Bacteria and Nematodes in Forestry, Agriculture and Horticulture, P.O. Box 115, NO- 1431 Ås, Norway Mogens Nicolaisen – Member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology - Entomology and Plant Pathology, Forsøgsvej 1, building 7611, B243, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark Iben M. Thomsen – Member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) University of Copenhagen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frb. C. Sandra A.I. Wright – Member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 801 76 Gävle. Trond Rafoss - Member of the Panel on Plant Health in VKM. Affiliation: 1) VKM; 2) Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Division of Biotechnology and Plant Health Fungal Plant Pathology in Forestry, Agriculture and Horticulture, P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway Acknowledgment VKM thanks the referees Dr. Roel P.J. Potting (Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority) and Dr. Anthony Deczynski (Clemson University) for reviewing and commenting on the manuscript. VKM emphasises that the referees are not responsible for the content of the final opinion. In accordance with VKM’s routines for approval of a risk assessment, VKM received the referees' comments before evaluation and approval by the Panel and prior to publication. VKM would also like to thank Direção Geral De Alimentação e Veterinária, Portugal for their valuable information on the distribution of Epitrix papa in Portugal. Competence of VKM experts Persons working for VKM, either as appointed members of the Committee or as external experts, do this by virtue of their scientific expertise, not as representatives for their employers or third party interests. The Civil Services Act instructions on legal competence apply for all work prepared by VKM. VKM Report 2019: 17 Table of contents Pest risk assessment of selected Epitrix species .................................................... 1 Pest risk assessment of selected Epitrix species ................................................................ 3 Authors of the opinion .................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgment ............................................................................................................ 4 Competence of VKM experts ............................................................................................ 4 Table of contents .................................................................................................... 5 Summary ................................................................................................................ 8 Sammendrag på norsk ......................................................................................... 10 Abbreviations and glossary .................................................................................. 12 Background as provided by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority ...................... 14 Terms of reference as provided by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority ........... 15 Pest risk assessment ............................................................................................ 16 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 16 1.1 Purpose and scope ............................................................................................... 16 1.2 Method and information collection ......................................................................... 16 1.3 Literature search strategy ..................................................................................... 16 1.4 Data collection ..................................................................................................... 16 1.5 Ratings of probabilities and uncertainties ............................................................... 17 2 Pest categorization ...................................................................................... 17 3 Pest taxonomy, biology, occurrence, hosts and regulatory status ............... 19 3.1 Pest identification, name and taxonomic position .................................................... 19 3.2 Taxonomic information ......................................................................................... 19 Identifying species of Epitrix....................................................................... 20 The taxonomic challenge ........................................................................... 20 3.3 Biological information ........................................................................................... 22 3.4 Host plant species ................................................................................................ 23 Host plant species of Epitrix cucumeris ........................................................ 24 Host plant species of Epitrix hirtipennis ....................................................... 24 Host plant species of Epitrix papa ............................................................... 25 3.5 Geographical distribution ...................................................................................... 25 Geographic distribution of Epitrix cucumeris ................................................ 25 Geographic distribution of Epitrix hirtipennis ................................................ 26 VKM Report 2019: 17 Geographic distribution of Epitrix papa ........................................................ 27 3.6 Occurrence of the pests in the PRA area ................................................................ 28 3.7 Regulatory status ................................................................................................. 28 4 Assessment of the probability of introduction and spread ........................... 30 4.1 Probability of entry of a pest ................................................................................. 30 Identification of pathways of entry .............................................................. 30 Probability of the pest being associated with potatoes at origin of shipment ... 33 Probability of survival during transport or storage .......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphological Systematics of the Nightshade Flea Beetles Epitrix
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2016 Morphological Systematics of the Nightshade Flea Beetles Epitrix Foudras and Acallepitrix Bechyné (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) in America North of Mexico Anthony Martin Deczynski Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Deczynski, Anthony Martin, "Morphological Systematics of the Nightshade Flea Beetles Epitrix Foudras and Acallepitrix Bechyné (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) in America North of Mexico" (2016). All Theses. 2479. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2479 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORPHOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE NIGHTSHADE FLEA BEETLES EPITRIX FOUDRAS AND ACALLEPITRIX BECHYNÉ (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: GALERUCINAE: ALTICINI) IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Entomology by Anthony Martin Deczynski August 2016 Accepted by: Dr. Michael Caterino, Committee Chair Dr. Peter Adler Dr. J. Antonio Baeza ABSTRACT The flea beetle genera Epitrix and Acallepitrix are revised for America North of Mexico, building on a prior preliminary revision of the genus Epitrix by the author (Deczynski 2014). Four new species are described: Epitrix cuprea sp. nov., E. rileyi sp. nov., E. latifrons sp. nov., and E. vasinoda sp. nov., bringing the North American Epitrix fauna to a total of 26 species. A key is provided to adults of all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional IPPC Workshops 2015 Surveillance: Working Together to Strengthen Implementation
    International Plant Protection Convention Surveillance: Working together to strengthen implementation Regional IPPC Workshops 2015 Surveillance: Working together to strengthen implementation The CPM agreed for an increased emphasis on surveillance in the next several years. This will take place through an Implementation Pilot Programme on Surveillance, which will be a coordinated effort with active participation from contracting parties and RPPOs. The Regional IPPC Workshops are an opportunity to share experiences with surveillance activities such as: current status, upcoming plans, and successes and challenges of surveillance activities within your country. In 2015, Member Countries answered a questionnaire on surveillance circulated by the IPPC Secretariat, and presented a summary on surveillance activities undertaken during the regional workshop. The data provided by Member Countries were extremely rich and useful to define activities to be set in the framework of the Implementation Pilot Programme on Surveillance. The content of the questionnaire for the regions in which an IPPC regional workshop was organized are provided below: Near East and North Africa, Pacific, Central Asia and Eastern Europe, Caribbean and Latin America (in Spanish). Surveillance: An official process which collects and records data on pest presence or absence by survey, monitoring or other procedures (ISPM 5) Question 1: What general surveillance activities take place in your country? (General surveillance is a process whereby information on particular pests which are of concern for an area is gathered from many sources, wherever it is available and provided for use by the NPPO – ISPM 6) 1. NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA Egypt: The general surveillance applied is the mainly through the weed institute which the institute apply on general basis based on the ISPM 6.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND ET MEDITERRANEENNE MEDITERRANEAN POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 4 PARIS, 2018-04 General 2018/068 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List 2018/069 Quarantine lists of Kazakhstan (2017) 2018/070 EPPO report on notifications of non-compliance 2018/071 EPPO communication kits: templates for pest-specific posters and leaflets 2018/072 Useful publications on Spodoptera frugiperda Pests 2018/073 First report of Tuta absoluta in Tajikistan 2018/074 First report of Tuta absoluta in Lesotho 2018/075 First reports of Grapholita packardi and G. prunivora in Mexico 2018/076 First report of Scaphoideus titanus in Ukraine 2018/077 First report of Epitrix hirtipennis in France 2018/078 First report of Lema bilineata in Italy 2018/079 Eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in Brünisried, Switzerland 2018/080 Update on the situation of Anoplophora glabripennis in Austria Diseases 2018/081 First report of Ceratocystis platani in Turkey 2018/082 Huanglongbing and citrus canker are absent from Egypt 2018/083 Xylella fastidiosa eradicated from Switzerland 2018/084 Update on the situation of Ralstonia solanacearum on roses in Switzerland 2018/085 First report of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma fragariae’ in Slovenia Invasive plants 2018/086 Ambrosia artemisiifolia control in agricultural areas in North-west Italy 2018/087 Optimising physiochemical control of invasive Japanese knotweed 2018/088 Update on LIFE project IAP-RISK 2018/089 Conference: Management and sharing of invasive alien species data to support knowledge-based decision making at regional level (2018-09-26/28, Bucharest, Romania) 21 Bld Richard Lenoir Tel: 33 1 45 20 77 94 E-mail: [email protected] 75011 Paris Fax: 33 1 70 76 65 47 Web: www.eppo.int EPPO Reporting Service 2018 no.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorinated Insecticides Volume II Biological and Environmental Aspects
    CRC REVIVALS CRC REVIVALS G.T Brooks Chlorinated Insecticides Chlorinated Insecticides Volume II Biological and Environmental Aspects G.T Brooks ISBN 978-1-138-50533-9 ,!7IB1D8-fafddj! www.crcpress.com Chlorinated Insecticides V olume II Biological and Environmental Aspects Author: G. T. Brooks The University of Sussex Brighton, Sussex England First published 1974 by CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 Reissued 2018 by CRC Press © 1974 by Taylor & Francis CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepper Pest Management
    Pepper Pest Management Kaushalya Amarasekare Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entomology Dept. of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences College of Agriculture Tennessee State University University of Maryland Nashville, Tennessee Extension snaped.fns.usda.gov Goal The goal of this training is to educate stakeholders on arthropods (pest insects and mites) that damage peppers and methods to manage them using integrated pest management (IPM) techniques Objectives Upon completion of this training, the participants will be able to 1) teach, 2) demonstrate and 3) guide growers, small farmers, backyard and community gardeners, master gardeners, and other stakeholders on management of pest arthropods in peppers Course Outline 1. Introduction: background information on bell and chili pepper 2. Pests of pepper a) Seedling Pests b) Foliage Feeders c) Pod Feeders 3. Summary 4. References Introduction Bell /sweet pepper Peppers • Family Solanaceae • Capsicum annum L. • Bell/sweet peppers and chili agmrc.org Peppers: consumed as • Fresh • Dried chili pepper • Ground as spices • Processed (canned, pickled, brined or in salsas) 570cjk, Creative Commons wifss.ucdavis.edu Bell Pepper • 2017: U.S. consumption of fresh bell peppers ~ 11.4 lbs./person • High in vitamin C and dietary fiber • Provide small amounts of several vitamins and minerals • Usually sold as fresh produce Maturity Sugar Content Chili Pepper • 2017: U.S. consumption of chili peppers ~ 7.7 lbs./person • High in vitamin C • Small amounts of vitamin A and B-6, iron and magnesium 570cjk, Creative Commons wifss.ucdavis.edu • Sold as fresh produce and dried (whole peppers, crushed or powdered) pepperscale.com Myscha Theriault U.S. green pepper production • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
    DAVID MARCHAND STRATÉGIES DE PONTE ET D’ALIMENTATION LARVAIRE CHEZ LA PYRALE DE LA CANNEBERGE, ACROBASIS VACCINII (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures de l'Université Laval pour l’obtention du grade de Philosophiae Doctor (Ph. D.) Département de biologie FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES ET GÉNIE UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL QUÉBEC MAI 2003 © David Marchand, 2003 ii Résumé Chez les espèces d’insectes dont le développement larvaire nécessite plusieurs hôtes, la survie larvaire peut être dépendante à la fois du comportement d’oviposition des femelles et du comportement de recherche des larves. La présente thèse porte sur l'étude de ces deux comportements et leurs possibles impacts sur la performance larvaire de la pyrale de la canneberge, Acrobasis vaccinii (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), une espèce dont chaque larve a besoin de plusieurs fruits de canneberge, Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericacae), pour compléter son développement. Dans un premier temps, j’ai démontré que les femelles en laboratoire pondent significativement plus souvent sur les plus gros fruits disponibles; la taille des larves sortant du premier fruit choisi par la femelle étant proportionnelle à la taille de ce fruit. Cependant, sur le terrain, cette préférence n’a pas été observée et mon étude met en évidence que la période d’oviposition survient tôt dans la saison, dès l’apparition des premiers fruits; ceci impliquant une faible variabilité dans la taille des sites de ponte disponibles. Cette étude démontre également une distribution hétérogène des fruits de canneberge en nature et une variabilité importante dans la production annuelle de fruits entre mes deux années d’étude. Le fait que les fruits puissent être rares certaines années serait une raison conduisant les femelles à accepter les fruits de plus faible qualité (fruits de petite taille).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Ecological Control Methods for Epitrix Spp
    Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 1 (1):Global 95-97, J. Environ.Winter 2015Sci. Manage., 1 (1): 95-97, Winter 2015 DOI: 10.7508/gjesm.2015.01.008 Short Review Paper Chemical and ecological control methods for Epitrix spp. * A. G. S. Cuthbertson The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK Received 25 September 2014; revised 24 October 2014; accepted 20 November 2014; available online 1 December 2014 ABSTRACT: Very little information exists in regards to the control options available for potato flea beetles, Epitrix spp. This short review covers both chemical and ecological options currently available for control of Epitrix spp. Synthetic pyrethroids are the weapon of choice for the beetles. However, the impetus in integrated pest management is to do timely (early-season) applications with something harsh which will give long-term protection at a time when there are not a lot of beneficials in the field. Finding the balance for control of Epitrix spp. is proving difficult. Key words: Chemical control; Epitrix spp.; Potato crops; Pesticide sprays INTRODUCTION The genus Epitrix (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: In North America, where they are native pests, Alticinae) comprises nearly 180 species worldwide. Most Epitrix spp. can be well controlled with insecticides of the species occur in the neotropics (130) and only 12 although the timing of spray applications is critical. and 17 species are known from North America and Monitoring programmes and thresholds for sprays Europe, respectively (Doeberl, 2000). Epitrix species have therefore been developed. Sprays may be justified feed mainly on plants from the family Solanaceae, though when there is more than 1 adult feeding hole on a leaf they may feed on other plant families when their per 10 plants, or more than 1 beetle per 10 net sweeps preferential host is not available (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND ET MEDITERRANEENNE MEDITERRANEAN POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 8 PARIS, 2017-08 General 2017/145 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List 2017/146 Quarantine list of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) 2017/147 EPPO communication kits: new templates for pest-specific posters and leaflets Pests 2017/148 Rhynchophorus ferrugineus does not occur in Australia 2017/149 Platynota stultana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): added again to the EPPO Alert List Diseases 2017/150 First report of Puccinia hemerocallidis in Portugal 2017/151 First report of Pantoea stewartii in Malaysia 2017/152 Citrus leprosis disease is associated with several viruses 2017/153 Brevipalpus phoenicis, vector of citrus leprosis, is a species complex Invasive plants 2017/154 The suppressive potential of some grass species on the growth and development of Ambrosia artemisiifolia 2017/155 Bidens subalternans in the EPPO region: addition to the EPPO Alert List 2017/156 Abiotic constraints and biotic resistance control the establishment success of Humulus scandens 21 Bld Richard Lenoir Tel: 33 1 45 20 77 94 E-mail: [email protected] 75011 Paris Fax: 33 1 70 76 65 47 Web: www.eppo.int EPPO Reporting Service 2017 no. 8 - General 2017/145 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List By searching through the literature, the EPPO Secretariat has extracted the following new data concerning quarantine pests and pests included (or formerly included) on the EPPO Alert List, and indicated in bold the situation of the pest concerned using the terms of ISPM no.
    [Show full text]
  • PM 7/109 (2) Epitrix Cucumeris, Epitrix 
    Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin (2017) 47 (1), 10–17 ISSN 0250-8052. DOI: 10.1111/epp.12362 European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization Organisation Europe´enne et Me´diterrane´enne pour la Protection des Plantes PM 7/109 (2) Diagnostics Diagnostic PM 7/109 (2) Epitrix cucumeris, Epitrix papa, Epitrix subcrinita, Epitrix tuberis Specific scope Specific approval and amendment This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for adults of First approved in 2011-09. Epitrix cucumeris, Epitrix papa, Epitrix subcrinita and Revision approved in 2016-01. Epitrix tuberis. (https://gd.eppo.int/). This protocol focuses on detection of 1. Introduction Epitrix species in potato. Epitrix subcrinita, Epitrix tuberis and Epitrix cucumeris are flea beetles belonging to the North American species of Epitrix developing on Solanum tuberosum (Solanaceae). 2. Identity Epitrix cucumeris is established in the Azores Islands (Por- Name: Epitrix cucumeris (Harris) tugal) where it was collected for the first time in Faial Taxonomic position: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae Island around 1979 (Boavida & Germain, 2009). In main- EPPO code: EPIXCU land Portugal, E. cucumeris was detected with another spe- Phytosanitary categorization: EPPO A2, EU Commission cies new to science, Epitrix papa, in approximately 2004 decision 2016/1359/EU when unusual damage to potato crops was observed (Oli- veira et al., 2008). Epitrix papa was initially misidentified Name: Epitrix papa Orlova-Bienkowskaja as Epitrix similaris, another North American species Taxonomic position: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae (Orlova-Bienkowskaja, 2015). Both species have also been EPPO code: EPIXPP detected in Spain. To date, E. tuberis and E. subcrinita Phytosanitary categorization: EPPO A2, EU Commission have not been detected in the EPPO region.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect and Mite Pests of Pepino (Solanum Muricatum Ait.) in Japan
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36453 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e36453 Research Article Insect and mite pests of pepino (Solanum muricatum Ait.) in Japan Tadashi Ishikawa‡§, Ken Takahata ‡ Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi-shi, Kanagawa, Japan § Laboratory of Vegetables, Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Atsugi-shi, Kanagawa, Japan Corresponding author: Tadashi Ishikawa ([email protected]) Academic editor: Jenő Kontschán Received: 23 May 2019 | Accepted: 06 Aug 2019 | Published: 13 Aug 2019 Citation: Ishikawa T, Takahata K (2019) Insect and mite pests of pepino (Solanum muricatum Ait.) in Japan. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36453. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e36453 Abstract To further increase the basic knowledge regarding the establishment of pest control for pepino (Solanum muricatum Ait.), we conducted surveys of pepino pests in Japan. Thirty- four insect and four mite species were recognized as pests of pepino plants in the present study. Including the results of previous studies, a total of 41 species of insects and mites have been reported as pests of pepino plants in Japan. Three species, namely onion thrips (Thrips tabaci), two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae), and cotton whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci), are likely the most important insect and mite pests of pepino plants, because they were collected from more than half of the study sites and were much more abundant on pepino plants than the other pest species. Keywords sweet cucumber, pest management, Tetranychus urticae, Thrips tabaci, Bemisia tabaci © Ishikawa T, Takahata K. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Profile for Tobacco in West Virginia
    Crop Profile for Tobacco in West Virginia Prepared: March 14, 1999 General Production Information ● West Virginia ranked 15th in United States tobacco production in 1996 (1) ● West Virginia contributed 0.18% to total U.S. tobacco production in 1996 (2) ● Burley tobacco area harvested a total of 17,000 acres with yields averaging 1,200 pounds per acre and production totaling 2.04 million pounds in 1996 (1) ● Tobacco production value was $3,923,000 in 1996 (1) Production Regions West Virginia's tobacco crop is mainly concentrated in the southwestern region of the state. Mason County is the leading tobacco producing county with 560,000 pounds, followed by Putnam (460,000), Lincoln (440,000), Cabell (290,000), and Jackson counties (110,000). Tobacco production of the aforementioned counties accounted for over 91 percent of the state total in 1996 (1). Cultural Practices A good source of transplants is required to produce a satisfactory tobacco crop. Proper site selection is essential in producing transplants available for field planting when suitable conditions exist (3 and 4). Common characteristics of a good plant bed include: ● A deep, fertile, and well drained soil high in organic matter The Crop Profile/PMSP database, including this document, is supported by USDA NIFA. ● Soil with a slight (5%) southern or western slope ● Exposure to sunshine from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m ● A clean water supply for irrigation ● Being located away from tobacco barns and tobacco trash ● Being located away from tobacco fields to minimize the spread of common pests General Plant Bed Management ● Apply no more than 50 pounds of 12-6-6 tobacco plant bed fertilizer per 100 square yards before fumigation ● Fumigate with methyl bromide when soil moisture is suitable for cultivation and the soil temperature is at least 50 degrees ● Seed bed 70 to 75 days before the normal transplanting date using 0.17 ounce of seed per 100 square yard General Field Management Tobacco field sites should be level to gently rolling with good internal soil drainage.
    [Show full text]