DOCSLIB.ORG

Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean Major Trends Affecting Families in Central America and the Caribbean Prepared by: Dr. Godfrey St. Bernard The University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago Phone Contacts: 1-868-776-4768 (mobile) 1-868-640-5584 (home) 1-868-662-2002 ext. 2148 (office) E-mail Contacts: [email protected] [email protected] Prepared for: United Nations Division of Social Policy and Development Department of Economic and Social Affairs Program on the Family Date: May 23, 2003 Introduction Though an elusive concept, the family is a social institution that binds two or more individuals into a primary group to the extent that the members of the group are related to one another on the basis of blood relationships, affinity or some other symbolic network of association. It is an essential pillar upon which all societies are built and with such a character, has transcended time and space. Often times, it has been mooted that the most constant thing in life is change, a phenomenon that is characteristic of the family irrespective of space and time. The dynamic character of family structures, - including members’ status, their associated roles, functions and interpersonal relationships, - has an important impact on a host of other social institutional spheres, prospective economic fortunes, political decision-making and sustainable futures. Assuming that the ultimate goal of all societies is to enhance quality of life, the family constitutes a worthy unit of inquiry. Whether from a social or economic standpoint, the family is critical in stimulating the well being of a people. The family has been and will continue to be subjected to myriad social, economic, cultural, political and environmental forces that shape it. In fact, policy makers should consider the impact on families when determining a host of social policies concerning the well being of children, older persons, the development of human capital, the accumulation of national wealth and promotion of sustainable development. This paper is concerned with reviewing important trends affecting families in the region. It focuses on the range of factors associated with five major trends that are known to impact upon family life. These trends may continue to have implications for different forms of family living in the years ahead. The major trends are: (i) Changes in family structure: focusing on smaller size households, delayed marriage and childbearing, increased rates of divorce, and single parenthood, (ii) Increased migration, (iii) Demographic ageing and its social and economic implications, (iv) The HIV/AIDS pandemic, and (v) The impact of globalization on families. Regional Coverage: Central America and the Caribbean Though characterized by different levels of development, the historical legacy of the countries of Central America has spawned relative homogeneity across the region with respect to linguistic traditions, ethnic composition and cultural expression. Belize, despite its British heritage and membership within the Caribbean Community (Caricom), displays many of the vestiges and social artifacts of its Hispanic neighbours and the 1 country may have more in common with its Central American neighbours than its Anglophone partners. Regarding population size, the countries of Central America exhibit considerable differences. The largest country, Mexico has more than 103 million inhabitants. For the other countries population size ranges from 12 million in Guatemala to almost 7 million in Honduras, 6.5 million in El Salvador, 5.4 million in Nicaragua, 4 million in Costa Rica and 3 million in Panama. While the countries of Central America are contiguous mainland nations, the countries of the Caribbean are primarily small island states, the majority having a very small land area and population size. Only Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago have populations in excess of one million and among these five countries, the population sizes are extremely variable, ranging from 1.3 million in Trinidad and Tobago to 12 million in Cuba. Interestingly, Belize is the only country in Central America with a population size that is consistent with those of the majority of Caribbean islands that have populations not exceeding 350,000. Unlike Central America, the Caribbean Sub-Region is much more heterogeneous despite being much smaller. The historical legacy of the islands was varied and the linguistic diversity of the region shows this. The Caribbean boasts four linguistic regions – the Anglophone, Francophone, the Hispanic and the Dutch-speaking - with each region bearing socio-cultural vestiges that are uniquely associated with its colonial past. The ethnic character of populations in Central American countries is comprised mainly of mestizo and Amerindian persons. In several of these countries, there are small sub- populations of African descent, many of whom may have had ancestral origins in Caribbean territories. Though being part of the Caribbean, the populations of the two Hispanic Caribbean countries, namely Cuba and the Dominican Republic, exhibit demographic characteristics that are more like those of Central American countries. With respect to the Anglophone Caribbean, populations are principally of African descent with much smaller sub-populations of East Indian, Mixed, European and Middle Eastern origins. In the Caribbean countries, Trinidad and Tobago is a model of ethnic diversity as persons of East Indian and African origin collectively account for at least 80 per cent of the country’s population, each group accounting for a similar proportion of the total population. Except for Haiti that has an overwhelmingly large proportion of persons of African origin, the Francophone and Dutch-speaking Caribbean generally have substantial populations of European or mixed origins. Religion is a dominant feature in the lives of individuals and its value is usually reinforced within families. Christianity and in particular Catholicism, has been a dominant force throughout Central America and the Caribbean, while Protestant denominations predominate especially in the Anglophone Caribbean. In countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, Hinduism and Islam are major religions that also have profound influences on family life. Generally speaking, these religions are characterized by doctrines and teachings that have profound implications for family life, including the formation of unions, spousal roles, procreation and decisions surrounding the socialization of offspring. 2 Demographics, Social Structure and Quality of Life1 The formation and dissolution of unions and in particular, patterns associated with such life stage events are critical to the process of family formation. In Central America and particularly in the Caribbean, consensual unions have persisted alongside unions characterized by formal marriage. While family formation has been triggered by women’s participation in visiting relationships primarily in young age groups and notably in the twenties, common-law unions and formal marriage continue to be the main platforms upon which procreation and families are formed during women’s lifetime. This pattern has been supported by Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in the 1980s and 1990s in a number of Central American and Caribbean countries.2 Around 1950, there was considerable variation in the proportion of persons in consensual unions relative to all persons in union, such proportions ranging from 10 per cent in Chile, 50 per cent in Panama and almost 75 per cent in Haiti. In the Anglophone Caribbean in the early 1980s, (Mc Kenzie 1993) about two-thirds of all women were in formal marriage or a common-law relationship with the remaining one-third either in visiting unions, no longer in union or never in a union. There was little variation between the patterns observed across the countries, a principal exception being in Trinidad and Tobago where substantially greater proportions of women were involved in formal marriage due mainly to its East Indian sub-population. The 1987 Demographic and Health Surveys in Trinidad and Tobago, found that 41 percent of the women aged 15-49 years were currently married, 13.5 per cent were in common-law unions and 14.3 per cent in visiting unions. Formal marriage and common-law unions have persisted and are likely to be the basis of conjugal unions of women in the Caribbean Sub-Region. For selected Central American and Caribbean countries, Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the distribution of women aged 15-49 years according to marital status for specific periods in the 1980s and 1990s. In general, findings in the various countries support the view that with the exception of teenagers, women are most frequently found either in formal marriage or in consensual unions. Common-law and visiting unions have traditionally been formations associated with individuals from lower socio-economic groups in Caribbean societies. Nonetheless, recent orientations indicate the prevalence of common-law unions has increased among women from middle and higher socio-economic levels (Mc Kenzie, 1993). There used to be an emphasis on respectability and maintenance of the status hierarchy through approved family behaviour, with 1 Notwithstanding the proliferation of typologies to classify union status in Central America and the Caribbean, the paper seeks to combine union and marital status to obtain a profile of the conjugal status of women in the region. Using women as the point of reference to evaluate family structures in Central
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adoption Policy
    Adoption Policy West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Bureau for Children and Families Office of Children and Adult Services Jane McCallister, Director, Children and Adult Services Carla Harper, Program Manager II, Children and Adult Policy Revised September 16, 2015 Contents 1.0 Introduction and Overview ............................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Mission and Vision ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Philosophy ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Legal/Regulatory Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 2.0 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 How Children Enter the State’s Custody .................................................................................. 12 3.1 How Children Enter Foster Care ............................................................................................ 12 3.2 Legal Authority for Adoptive Placement ................................................................................ 12 3.3 Permission to Accept Guardianship ...................................................................................... 13 3.4 Required Consents
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Adoption Sibling Visitation Dawn J
    ARE YOU STILL MY FAMILY? POST-ADOPTION SIBLING VISITATION DAWN J. POST, ESQ., SARAH MCCARTHY, ESQ., ROGER SHERMAN, PH.D. AND SERVET BAYIMLI * I. INTRODUCTION On Kayla’s1 first birthday in July of 1998, she was placed into foster care following allegations that her seventeen-year-old mother neglected her. Kayla was initially placed with her mother in a city-operated home for teenagers with children.2 However, when her mother was no longer able to care for her, Kayla’s paternal grandmother took over as her foster mother.3 Soon after Kayla’s new placement, her mother gave birth to another baby, Copyright © 2015, Dawn J. Post, Esq., Sarah McCarthy Esq., Roger Sherman, Ph.D and Servet Bayimli. * We are practitioners in the child welfare field. Accordingly, much of what is written in this Article is our view of the situation as it currently stands. Also, the case examples mentioned contain confidential information for which citation cannot be provided. However, these cases were handled by or explained to us other attorneys, social workers, or participants in their respective cases. We are indebted to Executive Director Karen P. Simmons for her mentorship and support; Veronica Kapka and Latoya Lennard for their research and work on the narrative interviews; and CPIC Harvard fellows Allison Torsiglieri and Gene Young Chang for their insightful comments and editing. 1 Interview with Kayla, Adoptee, Children’s Law Center New York, in Brooklyn, N.Y. (Nov. 11, 2013) [hereinafter Kayla Interview] (unpublished) (on file with authors). From December 2013 through June 2014, the Children’s Law Center New York (CLCNY) conducted interviews of young people and adults who had experienced the loss of their sibling, as well as adoptive parents who had either encouraged or terminated sibling contact, and were solicited from LinkedIn or at conferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Placement of Children with Relatives
    STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinship Terminology
    Fox (Mesquakie) Kinship Terminology IVES GODDARD Smithsonian Institution A. Basic Terms (Conventional List) The Fox kinship system has drawn a fair amount of attention in the ethno­ graphic literature (Tax 1937; Michelson 1932, 1938; Callender 1962, 1978; Lounsbury 1964). The terminology that has been discussed consists of the basic terms listed in §A, with a few minor inconsistencies and errors in some cases. Basically these are the terms given by Callender (1962:113-121), who credits the terminology given by Tax (1937:247-254) as phonemicized by CF. Hockett. Callender's terms include, however, silent corrections of Tax from Michelson (1938) or fieldwork, or both. (The abbreviations are those used in Table l.)1 Consanguines Grandparents' Generation (1) nemesoha 'my grandfather' (GrFa) (2) no hkomesa 'my grandmother' (GrMo) Parents' Generation (3) nosa 'my father' (Fa) (4) nekya 'my mother' (Mo [if Ego's female parent]) (5) nesekwisa 'my father's sister' (Pat-Aunt) (6) nes'iseha 'my mother's brother' (Mat-Unc) (7) nekiha 'my mother's sister' (Mo [if not Ego's female parent]) 'Other abbreviations used are: AI = animate intransitive; AI + O = tran- sitivized AI; Ch = child; ex. = example; incl. = inclusive; m = male; obv. = obviative; pi. = plural; prox. = proximate; sg. = singular; TA = transitive ani­ mate; TI-0 = objectless transitive inanimate; voc. = vocative; w = female; Wi = wife. Some citations from unpublished editions of texts by Alfred Kiyana use abbreviations: B = Buffalo; O = Owl (for these, see Goddard 1990a:340). 244 FOX
    [Show full text]
  • Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with At-Risk Families
    ISSUE BRIEF January 2013 Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) is a family-centered What’s Inside: treatment approach proven effective for abused and at-risk children ages 2 to 8 and their caregivers—birth parents, • What makes PCIT unique? adoptive parents, or foster or kin caregivers. During PCIT, • Key components therapists coach parents while they interact with their • Effectiveness of PCIT children, teaching caregivers strategies that will promote • Implementation in a child positive behaviors in children who have disruptive or welfare setting externalizing behavior problems. Research has shown that, as a result of PCIT, parents learn more effective parenting • Resources for further information techniques, the behavior problems of children decrease, and the quality of the parent-child relationship improves. Child Welfare Information Gateway Children’s Bureau/ACYF 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20024 800.394.3366 Email: [email protected] Use your smartphone to https:\\www.childwelfare.gov access this issue brief online. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With At-Risk Families https://www.childwelfare.gov This issue brief is intended to build a better of the model, which have been experienced understanding of the characteristics and by families along the child welfare continuum, benefits of PCIT. It was written primarily to such as at-risk families and those with help child welfare caseworkers and other confirmed reports of maltreatment or neglect, professionals who work with at-risk families are described below. make more informed decisions about when to refer parents and caregivers, along with their children, to PCIT programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Children and Stepfamilies: a Snapshot
    Children and Stepfamilies: A Snapshot by Chandler Arnold November, 1998 A Substantial Percentage of Children live in Stepfamilies. · More than half the Americans alive today have been, are now, or eventually will be in one or more stepfamily situations during their lives. One third of all children alive today are expected to become stepchildren before they reach the age of 18. One out of every three Americans is currently a stepparent, stepchild, or stepsibling or some other member of a stepfamily. · Between 1980 and 1990 the number of stepfamilies increased 36%, to 5.3 million. · By the year 2000 more Americans will be living in stepfamilies than in nuclear families. · African-American children are most likely to live in stepfamilies. 32.3% of black children under 18 residing in married-couple families do so with a stepparent, compared with 16.1% of Hispanic origin children and 14.6% of white children. Stepfamily Situations in America Of the custodial parents who have chosen to remarry we know the following: · 86% of stepfamilies are composed of biological mother and stepfather. · The dramatic upsurge of people living in stepfamilies is largely do to America’s increasing divorce rate, which has grown by 70%. As two-thirds of the divorced and widowed choose to remarry the number of stepfamilies is growing proportionately. The other major factor influencing the number of people living in stepfamilies is the fact that a substantial number of children entering stepfamilies are born out of wedlock. A third of children entering stepfamilies do so after birth to an unmarried mother, a situation that is four times more common in black stepfamilies than white stepfamilies.1 Finally, the mode of entry into stepfamilies also varies drastically with the age of children: while a majority of preschoolers entering stepfamilies do so after nonmarital birth, the least frequent mode of entry for these young children (16%) fits the traditional conception of a stepfamily as formed 1 This calculation includes children born to cohabiting (but unmarried) parents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Major Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on The
    Fayetteville State University DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University Faculty Working Papers from the School of School of Education Education Summer 2008 The aM jor Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on the Professional Experiences of Black Zimbabwean Women Leaders in Higher Education Miriam Chitiga Fayetteville State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/soe_faculty_wp Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Chitiga, Miriam, "The aM jor Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on the Professional Experiences of Black Zimbabwean Women Leaders in Higher Education" (2008). Faculty Working Papers from the School of Education. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/soe_faculty_wp/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers from the School of Education by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Forum on Public Policy The Major Influences of the Boundless-Extended Family System on the Professional Experiences of Black Zimbabwean Women Leaders in Higher Education Miriam Miranda Chitiga, Claflin University, Orangeburg, South Carolina Abstract The article examines the major influences of the black Zimbabwean boundless- extended family system on the professional trajectories of women leaders working within the higher education system of Zimbabwe. The study is based on in-depth interviews conducted with thirty female leaders who shared information about their major family responsibilities. Using an analytical framework that facilitates a critical analysis of the evidence, the paper discusses the persisting significance of the interdependent systems of social stratification, namely race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, and class in the private and public spheres of the female leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Steps to Adoption We Hope This Information Will Make Your Experience a Little Easier
    HOW LONG DOES ADOPTING TAKE? Adopting a child always requires a waiting period of some “Thank you for asking duration. When home studies are presented, the custodial agency for the child must assess the strengths of all the about adoption!” interested families and decide which family can best meet the needs of a specific child. The time frame is not predictable and it can be frustrating for families who are ready and prepared to adopt. A prospective parent who has abilities/strengths to meet the needs for a waiting child with special needs may wait 9 months or more. If you have more questions WHAT KIND OF CHILDREN ARE WAITING? or need additional information: Most of the children who wait are: Please call: • Age six years old or older and have been in foster 1-800-DO-ADOPT care for eighteen (18) months or longer; OR • Have a close relationship with brothers or sisters your local department of social services and are placed with their sibling(s); www.dss.virginia.gov/localagency • Are a minority, based on racial, multi-racial, or ethnic heritage; • Have physical, mental, or emotional condition; or • Have a hereditary tendency, congenital problem, or birth injury leading to substantial risk of future disability. HOW MUCH DOES IT COST TO ADOPT? There is no charge when you adopt a special needs child in the custody of a local department of social services. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE? Adoption assistance, also called subsidized adoption is a means of providing a money payment and/or services to adoptive parent(s) on behalf of a child with special Facebook: Virginia Adopts needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Central America (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua): Patterns of Human Rights Violations
    writenet is a network of researchers and writers on human rights, forced migration, ethnic and political conflict WRITENET writenet is the resource base of practical management (uk) independent analysis e-mail: [email protected] CENTRAL AMERICA (GUATEMALA, EL SALVADOR, HONDURAS, NICARAGUA): PATTERNS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS A Writenet Report by Beatriz Manz (University of California, Berkeley) commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Status Determination and Protection Information Section (DIPS) August 2008 Caveat: Writenet papers are prepared mainly on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. The papers are not, and do not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. The views expressed in the paper are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Writenet or UNHCR. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................ iii 1 Introduction........................................................................................1 1.1 Regional Historical Background ................................................................1 1.2 Regional Contemporary Background........................................................2 1.3 Contextualized Regional Gang Violence....................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Honduras: Background and U.S
    Honduras: Background and U.S. Relations Peter J. Meyer Specialist in Latin American Affairs Updated July 22, 2019 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL34027 Honduras: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Honduras, a Central American nation of 9.1 million people, has had close ties with the United States for many years. The country served as a base for U.S. operations designed to counter Soviet influence in Central America during the 1980s, and it continues to host a U.S. military presence and cooperate on antidrug efforts today. Trade and investment linkages are also long- standing and have grown stronger since the implementation of the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) in 2006. In recent years, instability in Honduras—including a 2009 coup and significant outflows of migrants and asylum-seekers since 2014—has led U.S. policymakers to focus greater attention on conditions in the country and their implications for the United States. Domestic Situation President Juan Orlando Hernández of the conservative National Party was inaugurated to a second four-year term in January 2018. He lacks legitimacy among many Hondurans, however, due to allegations that his 2017 reelection was unconstitutional and marred by fraud. Hernández’s public standing has been further undermined by a series of corruption scandals that have implicated members of his family, administration, and party, and generated speculation about whether the president has participated in criminal activities. Honduras has made uneven progress in addressing the country’s considerable challenges since Hernández first took office in 2014. Public prosecutors have begun to combat corruption with the support of the Organization of American States-backed Mission to Support the Fight Against Corruption and Impunity in Honduras, but the mission’s mandate is scheduled to expire in January 2020 and Honduran political leaders have expressed little interest in extending it.
    [Show full text]
  • Kin Relationships
    In H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 951-954). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kin Relationships Kin relationships are traditionally defined as ties based on blood and marriage. They include lineal generational bonds (children, parents, grandparents, and great- grandparents), collateral bonds (siblings, cousins, nieces and nephews, and aunts and uncles), and ties with in-laws. An often-made distinction is that between primary kin (members of the families of origin and procreation) and secondary kin (other family members). The former are what people generally refer to as “immediate family,” and the latter are generally labeled “extended family.” Marriage, as a principle of kinship, differs from blood in that it can be terminated. Given the potential for marital break-up, blood is recognized as the more important principle of kinship. This entry questions the appropriateness of traditional definitions of kinship for “new” family forms, describes distinctive features of kin relationships, and explores varying perspectives on the functions of kin relationships. Questions About Definition Changes over the last thirty years in patterns of family formation and dissolution have given rise to questions about the definition of kin relationships. Guises of kinship have emerged to which the criteria of blood and marriage do not apply. Assisted reproduction is a first example. Births resulting from infertility treatments such as gestational surrogacy and in vitro fertilization with ovum donation challenge the biogenetic basis for kinship. A similar question arises for adoption, which has a history 2 going back to antiquity. Partnerships formed outside of marriage are a second example. Strictly speaking, the family ties of nonmarried cohabitees do not fall into the category of kin, notwithstanding the greater acceptance over time of consensual unions both formally and informally.
    [Show full text]
  • How Understanding the Aboriginal Kinship System Can Inform Better
    How understanding the Aboriginal Kinship system can inform better policy and practice: social work research with the Larrakia and Warumungu Peoples of the Northern Territory Submitted by KAREN CHRISTINE KING BSW A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Social Work Faculty of Arts and Science Australian Catholic University December 2011 2 STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP AND SOURCES This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person‟s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the Australian Catholic University Human Research Ethics Committee. Karen Christine King BSW 9th March 2012 3 4 ABSTRACT This qualitative inquiry explored the kinship system of both the Larrakia and Warumungu peoples of the Northern Territory with the aim of informing social work theory and practice in Australia. It also aimed to return information to the knowledge holders for the purposes of strengthening Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing. This study is presented as a journey, with the oral story-telling traditions of the Larrakia and Warumungu embedded and laced throughout. The kinship system is unpacked in detail, and knowledge holders explain its benefits in their lives along with their support for sharing this knowledge with social workers.
    [Show full text]