Portraits and Self-Portraits by Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Portraits and Self-Portraits by Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo1 PERFormiNG THE SELF AND THE OTHER: PorTraiTS AND SELF-PorTraiTS BY DiEGO RIVEra AND FriDA KahLO1 Ellen G. Landau "The Strange Couple from the Land Like Nefertiti and, of course, Frida of the Dot and the Line": although Kahlo herself, Neferisis has thick con- Frida Kahlo used this inscription on spicuous eyebrows. Ojo único, unlike one page of her journal to identify an Akhenaton, has a full fleshy look; so imaginary Egyptian couple she depict- too his child and baby Moses. All ed in accompanying drawings, there is three, in fact, more or less share the little doubt that she intended it to facial qualities of Diego Rivera, Frida have a personal double meaning.2 Kahlo’s husband (whom she actu- Playing both visually and linguis- tically on Amarna ruler Akhenaton 1 This essay was written as a lecture for and his famous consort, Kahlo no the international symposium Diego Rivera: A Transcultural Dialogue, held at the Cleveland doubt generated her fictional charac- Museum of Art (CMA) in February 1999 in ters, Ojo único, Neferisis, and their little conjunction with the opening of Diego Rivera: son, through a multi-layered process Art and Revolution, co-organized by INBA and CMA. I am indebted to William H. Robinson, of psychic associations. Indeed, flanking CMA Associate Curator of Modern Art, for the central fetus, the real historical inviting me to speak on this topic at the sym- spouses face each other in Kahlo’s posium. I would also like to thank Irene Herner, Moses, or Nucleus of Creation, a can- Debby Tenenbaum, and Amy Reed Frederick, as well as Bertha Cea of the American Embassy vas painted in 1945 (probably around in Mexico City, for helping to make this essay the time of her undated diary entry); possible, and Leticia López Orozco for inviting and a contemporaneous statement me to publish it in Cró­nicas. 2 All quotes from Kahlo’s diary are taken clarifies Kahlo’s interest in this pair: "I from the 1995 Abrams English edition. The imagine", Kahlo mused, "that besides pages referenced in this essay are discussed having been extraordinarily beautiful, by Lowe, 213-15, 220, 235. 3 [Nefertiti] must have been ‘a wild one’ Herrera, Frida, 326 and 482, quoting an informal lecture by Kahlo on Freud’s Moses and a most intelligent collaborator to and Monotheism given in 1945 at the home of her husband".3 Domingo Lavin. ally married twice, in 1928 and, after Diego my mother a brief divorce, in 1940). Moreover, Diego my father her word-picture of Nefertiti rather Diego my son deftly encapsulates Frida’s own auto- Diego = me biography. A few pages earlier, Kahlo used Once again, she concludes with a different set of artistic binaries meaningful wordplay: to metaphorize her relationship Diego Universo to Rivera. Here she called herself Diversidad en la unidad. ‘Auxocromo’ and him ‘Cromoforo’: Without a doubt, the diversity She who wears the color and He between Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo who sees the color. was patently obvious to all; indeed, their Since the year 1922. very visible physical discrepancies led Until always and forever. Now in Kahlo’s parents to complain she was 1944. After all the contracting a ludicrous marriage "bet- hours lived through. ween an elephant and a dove".4 Also apparent were the conspicuous distinc- In an annotation clearly meant tions between their oeuvres: the much for Rivera to read, Kahlo assigned her more famous Rivera was primarily a role in their marriage as subordinate, muralist with grand social and political but complementary; "You fulfill", she intentions. By contrast, Kahlo, influenced proclaims, "I receive". by primitive retablos, created small, But was their union really so con- intensely introspective works. But was ventionally gender-specific? In a later there a unity of intention and ethos that diary entry, Kahlo specifically enunci- transcended or linked their opposing ates each and every role she believed personal and artistic characteristics? that Rivera played in her life. Not all I will focus in this essay on of these are typically masculine. Her addressing this question by examin- list reads like a mantra: ing their shared practice of making self-portraits and mutual depictions. Diego beginning Through these, Rivera and Kahlo Diego builder Diego my child 4 Bambi, “Frida es una Mitad”, Excélsior Diego my boyfriend (México City), June 13, 1954, 6; quoted in Diego painter Hayden Herrera, “Beaty to his Beast: Frida Diego my lover Kahlo and Diego Rivera”, in Witney Chad- wick and Isabelle de Courtivron, eds., Signifi- Diego "my husband" cant Others: Creativity and Intimate Partnership. 16 Diego my friend (London: Thames and Hudson, 1993), 119. Reprografía, Frida y sus hermanas Adriana y Cristina, su prima Carmen y el niño Carlos Veraza, 1926. Foto: Archivo Fotográfico Manuel Toussaint/IIE. often portrayed their deepest fee- R i v e r a ’ s v a u n t e d a b i l - lings for their beloved Mexico and ity to embroider the truth was a trait betrayed the complexity of their noticed early, and it took on more personal emotions. of his own gargantuan proportions Imbricated within an admit- throughout his life. In his largely fanciful tedly fractious alliance, their affinities ‘autobiography’, told to Gladys March and polarities –so closely tied to the between 1944 and 1957, he describes strengths and weaknesses of their his first ‘apparition’ of Frida, their 1922 nation– often played out at a level of meeting on the scaffold while he, aged highest intensity when they looked 37, was painting Creation, a mural at inward and at each other. I will exam- the National Preparatory School in ine in particular the performative Mexico City, and she was a 15-year aspects of these portraits analyzing old pre-medical student. "She had them as visual texts, in which Rivera unusual dignity," Diego recalled, "and and Kahlo invent meanings with both self-assurance, and there was a strange individual and national importance. fire in her eyes. Her beauty was that 17 Frida Kahlo, Autorretrato en la frontera entre México y Estados Unidos, 1932, Óleo y collage sobre masonite. Foto: Archivo Fotográfico Manuel Toussaint/IIE. of a child, yet her breasts were well- ity as seen in her incarnation as The developed".5 Liberated Earth, at the Autonomous This event (which prompted University of Chapingo. Frida to tell friends her new ambi- In a particularly evocative passage tion was to have the great painter’s in the March book, Rivera also tells of baby) supposedly took place only his first glimpse of Lupe. Whereas a few days after Rivera began living Kahlo was tiny and doll-like, Marin with Guadalupe Marin, who would was "a strange and marvelous-looking soon become his first wedded wife creature, nearly six feet tall". and would remain his most impor- 18 tant model of voluptuous feminin- 5 March, 75. [Lupe] was black-haired, yet her this remark in a telling way. Hers was hair looked more like that of a not, he pointed out, "an ordinary and chestnut mare than a woman’s. regular beauty", but "the exceptional Her green eyes were so transpa- and characteristic beauty of what she rent she seemed to be blind. Her produces". Reckoning her "a vital force", face was an Indian’s, the mouth Rivera lauded Kahlo’s sincerity (which with its full, powerful lips open, he termed "both tender and cruel"), the corners drooping like those giving a Marxist assessment of "her exac- of a tiger. The teeth showed spar- titude and intensity" as "always reaching kling and regular: animal teeth a universal plane and extension and set in coral such as one sees in playing a social role we would dare to old idols. Held at her breast, her call poetically didactic and rigorously extraordinary hands had the dialectic". Additionally, Rivera acclaimed beauty of tree roots or eagle tal- Kahlo’s "velocity", "absolute frankness", ons. She was round-shouldered, "fantastic logic", and "constant power yet slim and strong and taper- to penetrate the ideas, intentions, and ing, with long, muscular legs that feelings of others". In short, he seems made me think of the legs of a most attracted by her "great possibili- wild filly.6 ties of imaginative creation".8 Notably, Rivera mentions to Although he had certainly taken Tibol his wife’s "ability to stand pain immediate notice of Frida’s budding far beyond the normal". Kahlo had chest, Rivera apparently did not feel polio as a child which withered one of similarly moved to rhapsodize either her legs, a physical characteristic she verbally or visually about the sexual shared with the Aztec God of War. nature of her physical characteristics, In September 1925, while a student except to admire her mustache and at the Preparatory School, she was her eyebrows. The latter seemed to impaled by a rod in a bizarre collision him "like the wings of a blackbird, between a tram and a bus. According their black arches framing two extra- ordinary brown eyes". (Frida, on the 6 Ibíd., 74. other hand, fixated –in her diary and 7 For Diego’s description of Frida, see in humorous drawings– on what she March, 102; for Frida’s of Diego, Abrams edi- considered Diego’s most erotic body tion of her diary, 17, commentary by Lowe, 213. parts: his breasts and "flower-foun- 8 See Rivera, "Frida Kahlo and Mexican tain", her petname for his penis!).7 Art", Boletin del Seminario de Cultura Mexicana, Diego did describe Frida to Raquel v. 1 (oct., 1943) and Raquel Tibol, "Frida Kahlo, artista de genio", La Prensa (Buenos Aires, Tibol in 1953 as "an extraordinarily Argentina, July 12, 1953), excerpts reprinted in handsome woman," but he qualified Tibol, "An Exchange of Looks", 65-66.
Recommended publications
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • El Museo Mural Diego Rivera Realiza Recorrido En Lengua Náhuatl, En El Contexto Del Día Internacional De Los Museos
    Dirección de Difusión y Relaciones Públicas Ciudad de México, a 19 de mayo de 2019 Boletín núm. 713 El Museo Mural Diego Rivera realiza recorrido en lengua náhuatl, en el contexto del Día Internacional de los Museos Este proyecto de inclusión y acceso al arte fortalece el papel de los museos como espacios de encuentro Se trata de un acercamiento a la diversidad cultural del país y a la obra del artista El Museo Mural Diego Rivera celebró con un recorrido guiado en lengua náhuatl en torno al mural Sueño de una tarde dominical en la Alameda Central, que el artista guanajuatense pintara entre julio y septiembre de 1947. El recorrido, además de abordar el contenido de la obra, también alude la historia del recinto. Esta actividad del Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes y Literatura (INBAL), realizada en el marco del Día Internacional de los Museos, se llevó a cabo en colaboración con el Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas (INALI). “El proyecto abordó los temas que ofrecemos durante nuestras visitas tradicionales, sólo que en náhuatl. Se habló sobre la historia del mural y de los personajes que aparecen, que fueron protagonistas de la historia de nuestro país. Este es un recorrido no sólo de acercamiento a la obra de Rivera, sino, particularmente, a la diversidad cultural que existe en el país”, señaló en entrevista Marisol Argüelles, directora del recinto. “El mural concentra varias etapas de la historia de México. Se explica el momento histórico, quiénes son los personajes, el papel de éstos dentro de la historia y de la composición pictórica y se alude a algunas reflexiones que el artista hace a través de su obra.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAMA ACADÉMICO Imagen De Portada
    Museo Nacional de Arte PROGRAMA ACADÉMICO Imagen de portada: Gabriel Fernández Ledesma (1900-1983) El mar 1936 Óleo sobre tela INBAL / Museo Nacional de Arte Acervo constitutivo, 1982 PROGRAMA ACADÉMICO Diego Rivera, Roberto Montenegro, Gerardo Murillo, Dr. Atl, Joaquín Clausell, David Alfaro Siqueiros, Lola Cueto, María Izquierdo, Adolfo Best Maugard, Pablo O’Higgins, Francisco Goitia, Jorge González Camarena, Rufino Tamayo, Abraham Ángel, entre muchos otros, serán los portavoces de los grandes cometidos de la plástica nacional: desde los pinceles transgresores de la Revolución Mexicana hasta los neomexicanismos; de las Escuelas al Aire Libre a las normas metódicas de Best Maugard; del dandismo al escenario metafísico; del portentoso género del paisaje al universo del retrato. Una reflexión constante que lleva, sin miramientos, del XX al XXI. Lugar: Museo Nacional de Arte Auditorio Adolfo Best Maugard Horario: Todos los martes de octubre y noviembre De 16:00 a 18:00 h Entrada libre XX en el XXI OCTUBRE 1 de octubre Conversatorio XX en el XXI Ponentes: Estela Duarte, Abraham Villavicencio y David Caliz, curadores de la muestra. Se abordarán los grandes ejes temáticos que definieron la investigación, curaduría y selección de obras para las salas permanentes dedicadas al arte moderno nacional. 8 de octubre Decadentismo al Modernismo nacionalista. Los modos de sentir del realismo social entre los siglos XIX y XX Ponente: Víctor Rodríguez, curador de arte del siglo XIX del MUNAL La ponencia abordará la estética finisecular del XIX, con los puentes artísticos entre Europa y México, que anunciaron la vanguardia en la plástica nacional. 15 de octubre La construcción estética moderna.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear All, Thank You So Much for Taking the Time to Read This Early Draft Of
    Dear all, Thank you so much for taking the time to read this early draft of what I hope to turn into the fifth chapter of my dissertation. My dissertation analyzes the ways in which the political role of artists and cultural institutions in Mexico have changed in the wake of a series of political and socio-economic transformations commonly referred to as the country’s “twin” neoliberal and democratic transition. This chapter is a direct continuation of the previous one, in which I analyze the way the state directly commissioned and deployed art during the official bicentennial commemorations of Independence and the centennial commemorations of Revolution in 2010. In this chapter, my goal is to contrast these official commemorations with the way members of the artistic community itself engaged critically in the commemorative events and, by extension, with the state. I am testing many of the arguments here, as well as the structure of the chapter, and I am looking forward to any suggestions, including the use of theory to sustain my arguments. To situate this chapter, I am pasting below a one-paragraph contextual introduction from the previous chapter: 2010 was one of the most violent years in Mexico’s recent history. The drug war launched by president Felipe Calderón a few years earlier was linked to over fifteen thousand homicides, and the visual and media landscape was saturated with gruesome images of the drug war’s casualties. That same year, Mexico commemorated two hundred years of independence and one hundred years of revolution. But despite the spectacular (and expensive) attempts to make the state’s power highly visible, the celebrations were marked by public indifference, resistance, and even outright hostility, and fell far from being an innocent expression of collective festivity.
    [Show full text]
  • La Voz De Esperanza
    I must confess that I’m not great at math (though, I thought I was). I thought we were celebrating 20 years of Calaveras in La Voz this year! The frst issue of Calaveras appeared in November, 1999. The Math La Voz de says it’s been twenty years (2019-1999 = 20)—but my fngers say twenty-one! If you count the frst Esperanza issue starting in 1999 and continue on your fngers November, 2019 to 2019, it’s 21 years of Calaveras! So we missed the Vol. 32 Issue 9 20th! Still, we must celebrate! And we are—starting Editor: Gloria A. Ramírez with the cover of this issue. Design: Elizandro Carrington Cover Art: Dream of a Sunday Afternoon in Diego Rivera’s, Dream of a Sunday Afternoon in Alameda Central Park (Sueño de Alameda Central Park /Sueño de una tarde una tarde dominical en la Alameda Central) painted circa 1947 is a massive mural, dominical en la Alameda Central by Diego Rivera 4.8 x 15 meters, located at the Museo Mural Diego Rivera in Mexico City, next to Contributors the Alameda Park in my favorite part of Mexico City, Centro Historico, the historic Gloria Almaraz, Ellen Riojas Clark, Victor M. center of Mexico. The mural depicts famous people and events in Mexico’s history Cortez, Moisés Espino del Castillo, Anel Flores, Ashley G., Rachel Jennings, Pablo Martinez, from conquest to colonization and the Mexican Revolution happening all at once—as Dennis Medina, Adriana Netro, Kamala Platt, hundreds of famous personalities stroll through or spend time at the Alameda Central Rosemary Reyna-Sánchez, Carla Rivera, Norma Park that was created in 1592.
    [Show full text]
  • Angelina Beloff Como Misionera Cultural: Una Revalorización De Su Arte»
    GUERRERO OLAVARRIETA, Ana Paula (2017). «Angelina Beloff como misionera cultural: una revalorización de su arte». Monograma. Revista Iberoamericana de Cultura y Pensamiento, n. 1, pp. 177-193. URL: http://revistamonograma.com/index.php/mngrm/article/view/12 FECHA DE RECEPCIÓN: 17/10/2017 · FECHA DE ACEPTACIÓN: 7/11/2017 ISSN: 2603-5839 Angelina Beloff como misionera cultural: una revalorización de su arte Ana Paula GUERRERO OLAVARRIETA Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de México [email protected] Resumen: ¿Por qué estudiar a Angelina Beloff? ¿Qué relación tiene con el contexto mexicano? Los estudios que hay acerca de Angelina Beloff se han centrado bajo la sombra de Diego Rivera, con quien tuvo una relación de diez años. Por consiguiente, la investigación está encaminada a tener un acercamiento más crítico a su obra y a su desempeño laboral en Europa y en México del siglo XX. La presente investigación busca rescatar a Beloff dentro del contexto de los artistas mexicanos de la época. Sin hacer un recuento biográfico, toma como referencia diversos textos que la mencionan, para sustentar y debatir junto con los que han excluido la figura de Beloff dentro de la historiografía mexicana. Asimismo explica por qué es relevante estudiar a esta artista extranjera que decidió vivir en nuestro país junto con otras figuras del medio artístico contemporáneo. Palabras clave: Angelina Beloff, extranjera, arte mexicano, exclusión, historiografía. Abstract: Why study Angelina Beloff? What relationship does she has with the Mexican context? Studies about Angelina Beloff have been centered under Diego Rivera's shadow, with whom she had a relationship for ten years. Therefore, the investigation is driven to have a more critical close up to her art work and her job performance in Europe and Mexico during the Twentieth Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomova Prace
    f UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE Filozoficka fakulta DIPLOMovA PRAcE 2006 Petra BINKOvA ,.... Charles University in Prague Faculty of Philosophy & Arts Center for Ibero-American Studies Petra Bin k 0 v a The 20th Century Muralism in Mexico Ibero-American Studies Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Josef Opatrny 2005 1 I ! , i Prohlasuji, ze jsem disertacni praci vykonala samostatne s vyuzitim uvedenych pramenu a literatury. V Praze dne 25.1edna 2006 Petra Binkova , ) , ," ! !I·' ' i 2 i L Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein To J.M., R.S. and V.V . ... because of all of you, I do feel sane. 3 L LIST OF CONTENTS Introduction ..............................................................................05 Chapter I Mexican Mural Renaissance and an Apex of the Mexican School ...................................................... 15 Chapter II The Mexican School after 1950: Facing the Rupture ..................................................................................... 32 Chapter III Mexican Muralism After the Mexican School (1970s-1980s) ......................................................................... 51 Chapter IV Mexican Muralism After the Mexican School (1990s) .......................................................................71 Chapter V Mexican Muralism After the Mexican School: The Most Recent Developments ......................................... 89 Conclusion ............................................................................. 116 Bibliography ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La Secretaría De Cultura Da Conocer Nombramientos En Museos Del INBAL
    Comunicado No. 79 Ciudad de México, viernes 15 de febrero de 2019 La Secretaría de Cultura da conocer nombramientos en compañías y museos del INBAL Las compañías artísticas promoverán nuevos esquemas de producción artística, una perspectiva nacional, enfoques de inclusión social, igualdad e interdisciplina Se creará la Red Nacional de Museos para fortalecer su gestión y mejores prácticas de servicio La Directora General del Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes y Literatura (INBAL), doctora Lucina Jiménez, por acuerdo con la Secretaria de Cultura, licenciada Alejandra Frausto, en cumplimiento con la normatividad vigente, y luego de diversos diálogos con comunidades artísticas, da a conocer nuevos nombramientos y confirmaciones de las personas que tendrán la responsabilidad de fortalecer la promoción nacional e internacional de las compañías artísticas, así como la vocación de los 18 espacios museísticos que dependen del INBAL, con especial énfasis en la recuperación del diálogo entre el arte moderno y el arte contemporáneo mexicano, el manejo de sus colecciones, así como las itinerancias nacionales e internacionales. Compañías Artísticas Las compañías artísticas del Instituto han iniciado la redefinición de los modelos de producción artísticas de sus respectivas disciplinas que tomarán en cuenta la itinerancia nacional, la coproducción nacional e internacional, la interdisciplina, así como enfoques de promoción de la igualdad y la inclusión social. En la Compañía Nacional de Danza se crea una Codirección, la cual tendrán a su cargo la
    [Show full text]
  • Diego Rivera and the Left: the Destruction and Recreation of the Rockefeller Center Mural
    Diego Rivera and the Left: The Destruction and Recreation of the Rockefeller Center Mural Dora Ape1 Diego Rivera, widely known for his murals at the Detroit Institute ofArts and the San Francisco Stock Exchange Luncheon Club, became famous nationally and internationally when his mural for the Radio City ofAmerica (RCA) Building at Rockefeller Center in New York City was halted on 9 May 1933, and subsequently destroyed on 10 February 1934. Commissioned at the height of the Depression and on the eve of Hitler's rise to power, Rivera's mural may be read as a response to the world's political and social crises, posing the alternatives for humanity as socialist harmony, represented by Lenin and scenes of celebration from the Soviet state, or capitalist barbarism, depicted through scenes of unemployment, war and "bourgeois decadence" in the form of drinking and gambling, though each side contained ambiguous elements. At the center stood contemporary man, the controller of nature and industrial power, whose choice lay between these two fates. The portrait of Lenin became the locus of the controversy at a moment when Rivera was disaffected with the policies of Stalin, and the Communist Party (CP) opposition was divided between Leon Trotsky and the international Left Opposition on one side, and the American Right Opposition led by Jay Lovestone on the other. In his mural, Rivera presented Lenin as the only historical figure who could clearly symbolize revolutionary political leadership. When he refused to remove the portrait of Lenin and substitute an anonymous face, as Nelson Rockefeller insisted, the painter was summarily dismissed, paid off, and the unfinished mural temporarily covered up, sparking a nationwide furor in both the left and capitalist press.
    [Show full text]
  • Catrinas Y Judas En El Universo Decorativo Del Estudio De Diego Rivera Catrinas and Judas in the Decorative Universe of Diego Rivera´S Studio
    Res Mobilis Revista internacional de investigación en mobiliario y objetos decorativos Vol. 8, nº. 9, 2019 CATRINAS Y JUDAS EN EL UNIVERSO DECORATIVO DEL ESTUDIO DE DIEGO RIVERA CATRINAS AND JUDAS IN THE DECORATIVE UNIVERSE OF DIEGO RIVERA´S STUDIO Ariadna Ruiz Gómez1 Universidad Complutense Madrid Resumen El artista mexicano Diego Rivera encargó dos viviendas para él y Frida Kahlo al arquitecto Juan O´Gorman, quien les realizó un proyecto completamente moderno, usando un lenguaje lecorbusiano basado en un funcionalismo radical, de paramentos lisos, sin decoración. En el interior sigue las mismas premisas y diseña desde el fregadero de la cocina a los muebles, todo dentro de una estética minimalista y sencilla. Lo que sorprende al estudiar el mobiliario y los elementos decorativos del estudio de Rivera es que han perdurado los muebles de metal que diseñó O´Gorman, además de los que el muralista fue comprando, la mayoría realizados por artesanos este punto en el que centramos nuestra investigación, el que Rivera adornó su estudio con más de 140 enormes piezas, algunas de más de dos metros de altura, realizadas en cartón, que representan esqueletos y figuras de judas. Palabras clave: Diego Rivera, Frida Kahlo, catrinas, Judas, cartonería Abstract The Mexican artist Diego Rivera ordered the houses for Frida Kahlo and himself to the architect Juan O´Gorman who makes a project completely modern, using a Lecorbusian language based on a radical style smooth walls, without any decoration. Inside he follows the same principles and designs from the kitchen sink to the furniture; everything is done in a simple and minimalist way.
    [Show full text]
  • American Communists View Mexican Muralism: Critical and Artistic Responses1
    AMERICAN COMMUNISTS VIEW MEXICAN MURALISM: CRITICAL AND ARTISTIC RESPONSES1 Andrew Hemingway A basic presupposition of this essay is 1My thanks to Jay Oles for his helpful cri- that the influence of Mexican muralism ticisms of an earlier version of this essay. on some American artists of the inter- While the influence of Commu- war period was fundamentally related nism among American writers of the to the attraction many of these same so-called "Red Decade" of the 1930s artists felt towards Communism. I do is well-known and has been analysed not intend to imply some simple nec- in a succession of major studies, its essary correlation here, but, given the impact on workers in the visual arts revolutionary connotations of the best- is less well understood and still under- known murals and the well-publicized estimated.3 This is partly because the Marxist views of two of Los Tres Grandes, it was likely that the appeal of this new 2I do not, of course, mean to discount artistic model would be most profound the influence of Mexican muralism on non-lef- among leftists and aspirant revolutionar- tists such as George Biddle and James Michael ies.2 To map the full impact of Mexican Newell. For Biddle on the Mexican example, see his 'Mural Painting in America', Magazine of Art, muralism among such artists would be vol. 27, no. 7, July 1934, pp.366-8; An American a major task, and one I can not under- Artist's Story, Boston, Little, Brown and Company, take in a brief essay such as this.
    [Show full text]
  • World History Unit 03 2013-2014.Indd
    Unit 03, Class 15 The Mexican Revolution: Peace, Bread and Land 2013-2014 worldHistory Purpose: Do well fed people start revolutions? Part One: Homework After reading the assigned sections, complete the tasks that follow. The Mexican revolution, p. 722 Remembering the Revolution, p. 723 Reforms in Mexico, p. 724 1. What were the main ideas of the revolt in Mexico? Create three posters below that might be carried in a protest by a poor Mexican. It may be a phrase or a single word. 2. What is a villista? 309 3. The pictures below represent significant persons of the revolution time. Next to each picture, write a two sentence summary of that person’s actions during the period of the 1910 revolution. Porfirio Diaz Francisco Madero Emiliano Zapata 310 Part Two: The Revolution Section A: Video on Mexican Revolution Examine the video and take brief notes on the time period called the Porfiriato. Section B: Visualizing the Mexican Revolution Diego Rivera (December 8, 1886 – November 24, 1957) was a prominent Mexican painter and the hus- band of Frida Kahlo. His large wall works in fresco helped establish the Mexican Mural Movement in Mexican art. Between 1922 and 1953, Rivera painted murals among others in Mexico City, Chapingo, Cuernavaca, San Francisco, Detroit, and New York City. Sueño de una tarde dominical en la Alameda Central or Dream of a Sunday Afternoon in the Al- ameda Central is a mural created by Diego Rivera. It was painted between the years 1946 and 1947, and is the principal work of the “Museo Mural Diego Rivera” adjacent to the Alameda in the historic center of Mexico City.
    [Show full text]