DOCSLIB.ORG

Geochemical Characterization of Shallow Sediments from The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geochemical Characterization of Shallow Sediments from The GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SHALLOW SEDIMENTS FROM THE GROUNDING ZONE OF THE WHILLANS ICE STREAM by Kimberly Anne Roush A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Land Resources and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2019 ©COPYRIGHT by Kimberly Anne Roush 2019 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work has been the result of a collaboration including multiple people. To start, I want to thank my advisor, John Priscu, for taking me on, a geologist, as a student, entertaining many days of editing, and reminding me to wear deodorant; Mark Skidmore for his enthusiasm and shared story over many a field season; and John Dore for entertaining my wandering questions with respect to the fascinating field of oceanography. Thank you to Alex Michaud and Tristy Vick-Majors for all that you taught me at the bench, sharing your intrigue for polar science and entertaining my never ending stream of recently coded figures. Thank you to Carrie, Wei, Gus and Amy for their enduring inspiration, support in communicating with R, working with the IC, and creating more organization, structure and logical flow to my presentation abilities. Thank you to my family for seeding my curiosity in science and supporting me in this endeavor. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE WHILLANS GROUNDING ZONE ................. 1 Structure of the Thesis ......................................................................................... 3 Hypothesis and Objectives ................................................................................... 4 Significance of My Research ............................................................................... 6 Background: Glacio- and Antarctic Marine Environments ................................. 10 Ice Shelves and Ice Shelf Basal Melt ................................................................. 10 Grounding Zones ......................................................................................... 13 Historic Importance and Significance........................................................... 15 Grounding Line ........................................................................................... 16 Grounding Zone Wedge ............................................................................... 17 Identification of SLW and the WGZ ............................................................ 18 Importance of the Siple Coast ...................................................................... 20 Physical Controls on Marine Sedimentation....................................................... 24 Subglacial Fluvial Inputs ............................................................................ 26 Ross Sea Circulation, Advection and Ross Ice Shelf Cavity ......................... 27 Basal Fallout ................................................................................................ 32 Bioturbation ................................................................................................. 32 Synthesis ........................................................................................................... 33 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................. 34 2. SEDIMENT POREWATER GEOCHEMISTRY AT THE GZ .......................... 51 Contribution of Authors and Co-authors ............................................................ 51 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 53 Background ....................................................................................................... 55 Physical Characteristics of the Sediment Core ............................................. 55 Water Isotopes ............................................................................................. 56 Dissolved Ions ............................................................................................. 62 Methods ............................................................................................................ 62 Sample Collection and Core Processing ....................................................... 62 Water Column ............................................................................................. 64 Sediment Porewater Extraction .................................................................... 65 Porosity and Particle Density ....................................................................... 68 Porewater Conductivity and Salinity ............................................................ 69 Grain Size .................................................................................................... 70 Grain Composition ...................................................................................... 70 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED Geochemistry............................................................................................... 71 Water Column........................................................................................ 71 Sediment Porewater ............................................................................... 71 Diffusion................................................................................................ 72 Dropstones ............................................................................................. 73 Isotopes ............................................................................................................. 74 Water Column........................................................................................ 74 Sediment Porewater ............................................................................... 75 Results............................................................................................................... 76 Porosity and Particle Density ....................................................................... 76 Porewater Conductivity and Salinity ............................................................ 77 Grain Size .................................................................................................... 78 Grain Composition ...................................................................................... 78 Geochemistry............................................................................................... 79 Water Column........................................................................................ 79 Sediment Porewater ............................................................................... 83 Diffusion................................................................................................ 84 Dropstones ............................................................................................. 84 Isotopes ....................................................................................................... 86 Water Column........................................................................................ 86 Sediment Porewater ............................................................................... 87 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 90 Porosity and Particle Bulk Density ............................................................... 90 Porewater Salinity and Conductivity ............................................................ 90 Grain Size .................................................................................................... 92 Grain Composition ...................................................................................... 93 Geochemistry............................................................................................... 94 Water Column........................................................................................ 94 Sediment Porewater ............................................................................... 96 Diffusion................................................................................................ 99 Isotopes ....................................................................................................... 99 Water Column........................................................................................ 99 Sediment Porewater ............................................................................. 100 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 103 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................... 104 v TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED 3. SEDIMENT POREWATER ORGANIC MATTER ................................................ 110 Contribution of Authors and Co-authors .......................................................... 110 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 112 Methods .......................................................................................................... 116 Sediment Particulate Organic Carbon and Particulate Organic Nitrogen ..... 116 Porewater Dissolved Organic Carbon and Total Dissolved Nitrogen .......... 117 Results............................................................................................................. 118 Sediment Particulate Organic Carbon and Particulate Organic Nitrogen ..... 118 Porewater Dissolved Organic Carbon and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY of the SCOTT GLACIER and WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA
    This dissertation has been /»OOAOO m icrofilm ed exactly as received MINSHEW, Jr., Velon Haywood, 1939- GEOLOGY OF THE SCOTT GLACIER AND WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1967 Geology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan GEOLOGY OF THE SCOTT GLACIER AND WISCONSIN RANGE AREAS, CENTRAL TRANSANTARCTIC MOUNTAINS, ANTARCTICA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Velon Haywood Minshew, Jr. B.S., M.S, The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by -Adviser Department of Geology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report covers two field seasons in the central Trans- antarctic Mountains, During this time, the Mt, Weaver field party consisted of: George Doumani, leader and paleontologist; Larry Lackey, field assistant; Courtney Skinner, field assistant. The Wisconsin Range party was composed of: Gunter Faure, leader and geochronologist; John Mercer, glacial geologist; John Murtaugh, igneous petrclogist; James Teller, field assistant; Courtney Skinner, field assistant; Harry Gair, visiting strati- grapher. The author served as a stratigrapher with both expedi­ tions . Various members of the staff of the Department of Geology, The Ohio State University, as well as some specialists from the outside were consulted in the laboratory studies for the pre­ paration of this report. Dr. George E. Moore supervised the petrographic work and critically reviewed the manuscript. Dr. J. M. Schopf examined the coal and plant fossils, and provided information concerning their age and environmental significance. Drs. Richard P. Goldthwait and Colin B. B. Bull spent time with the author discussing the late Paleozoic glacial deposits, and reviewed portions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary History of Reedy Glacier Brenda Hall Principal Investigator; University of Maine, Orono, [email protected]
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine University of Maine Office of Research and Special Collections Sponsored Programs: Grant Reports 5-30-2007 Collaborative Research: Late Quaternary History of Reedy Glacier Brenda Hall Principal Investigator; University of Maine, Orono, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/orsp_reports Part of the Climate Commons, and the Glaciology Commons Recommended Citation Hall, Brenda, "Collaborative Research: Late Quaternary History of Reedy Glacier" (2007). University of Maine Office of Research and Sponsored Programs: Grant Reports. 154. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/orsp_reports/154 This Open-Access Report is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Maine Office of Research and Sponsored Programs: Grant Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Final Report: 0229034 Final Report for Period: 06/2006 - 05/2007 Submitted on: 05/30/2007 Principal Investigator: Hall, Brenda L. Award ID: 0229034 Organization: University of Maine Title: Collaborative Research: Late Quaternary History of Reedy Glacier Project Participants Senior Personnel Name: Hall, Brenda Worked for more than 160 Hours: Yes Contribution to Project: Brenda Hall has led the mapping effort at Reedy Glacier. She is supervising a graduate student who is working on this project. In addition, she has undertaken all of the radiocarbon work. Post-doc Graduate Student Name: Bromley, Gordon Worked for more than 160 Hours: Yes Contribution to Project: Gordon Bromley is the principal graduate student on the University of Maine portion of this collaborative project.
    [Show full text]
  • Rb-Sr Provenance Dates of Feldspar in Glacial Deposits of the Wisconsin Range, Transantarctic Mountains
    Rb-Sr provenance dates of feldspar in glacial deposits of the Wisconsin Range, Transantarctic Mountains q F/XUR.E ' I Department of Geology and Mineralogy and Institute of Polar Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, J H MERCER ' °hi°43210 ABSTRACT than those of feldspar in the plateau till and range only from 0.46 to 0.66. Nevertheless, three feldspar fractions form a straight line on Glacial deposits in the Wisconsin Range (lat. 85° to 86°30'S, the Rb-Sr isochron diagram, the slope of which indicates a date of long. 120° to 130°W) of the Transantarctic Mountains include a 576 ± 21 Ma. The difference in the date derived from the feldspar of deposit of till on the summit plateau at an elevation of 2,500 m the glaciolacustrine sedimeyt may be caused by the presence of a above sea level and glaciolacustrine sediments along the Reedy component of Precambrian feldspar derived from the East Antarc- Glacier. The plateau till and underlying sediments consist of six tic Shield. units that appear to record the replacement of ice-free, periglacial conditions by ice cap glaciation of pre-Pleistocene age. Alterna- INTRODUCTION tively, the plateau till may have been deposited by the East Antarc- tic ice sheet either when it was thicker than at present or when the The glaciation of Antarctica in Cenozoic time was an important Wisconsin Range was lower in elevation. Feldspar size fractions event in the history of the Earth, the effects of which continue to from the plateau till have Rb/Sr ratios that increase with grain size influence climatic conditions and sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilulissat Icefjord
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1149.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Ilulissat Icefjord DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: DENMARK CRITERIA: N (i) (iii) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (i): The Ilulissat Icefjord is an outstanding example of a stage in the Earth’s history: the last ice age of the Quaternary Period. The ice-stream is one of the fastest (19m per day) and most active in the world. Its annual calving of over 35 cu. km of ice accounts for 10% of the production of all Greenland calf ice, more than any other glacier outside Antarctica. The glacier has been the object of scientific attention for 250 years and, along with its relative ease of accessibility, has significantly added to the understanding of ice-cap glaciology, climate change and related geomorphic processes. Criterion (iii): The combination of a huge ice sheet and a fast moving glacial ice-stream calving into a fjord covered by icebergs is a phenomenon only seen in Greenland and Antarctica. Ilulissat offers both scientists and visitors easy access for close view of the calving glacier front as it cascades down from the ice sheet and into the ice-choked fjord. The wild and highly scenic combination of rock, ice and sea, along with the dramatic sounds produced by the moving ice, combine to present a memorable natural spectacle. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Located on the west coast of Greenland, 250-km north of the Arctic Circle, Greenland’s Ilulissat Icefjord (40,240-ha) is the sea mouth of Sermeq Kujalleq, one of the few glaciers through which the Greenland ice cap reaches the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Extending Anomalous Miocene Volcanism at the Edge of The
    1 Evidence for Extending Anomalous Miocene Volcanism at the Edge of the 2 East Antarctic Craton 3 4 K. J. Licht1, T. Groth1, J. P. Townsend2, A. J. Hennessy1, S. R. Hemming3, T. P. Flood4, and M. 5 Studinger5 6 1Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 7 USA, 2HEDP Theory Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 3Department of 8 Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, 9 NY, USA, 4Geology Department, St. Norbert College, DePere, WI, USA, 5NASA Goddard Space Flight 10 Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 11 12 Corresponding author: Kathy Licht ([email protected]) 13 14 Key Points: 15 x Olivine basalt, hyaloclastite erratics and detrital zircon at Earth’s southernmost moraine 16 (Mt. Howe) indicate magmatic activity 17- 25 Ma. 17 x The source, indicated by a magnetic anomaly (-740 nT) ~400 km inland from the West 18 Antarctic Rift margin, expands extent of Miocene lavas. 19 x Data corroborate lithospheric foundering beneath southern Transantarctic Mountains based 20 on location of volcanism (duration < 5 my). 21 22 Abstract 23 Using field observations followed by petrological, geochemical, geochronological, and 24 geophysical data we infer the presence of a previously unknown Miocene subglacial volcanic 25 center ~230 km from the South Pole. Evidence of volcanism is from boulders of olivine-bearing 26 amygdaloidal/vesicular basalt and hyaloclastite deposited in a moraine in the southern 27 Transantarctic Mountains. 40Ar/39Ar ages from five specimens plus U-Pb ages of detrital zircon 28 from glacial till indicate igneous activity 25-17 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Explorer's Gazette
    EEXXPPLLOORREERR’’SS GAZETTE GAZETTE Published Quarterly in Pensacola, Florida USA for the Old Antarctic Explorers Association Uniting All OAEs in Perpetuating the History of U.S. Navy Involvement in Antarctica Volume 7, Issue 1 Old Antarctic Explorers Association, Inc Jan-Mar 2007 Photo by Charlie Henke Pensacola, Florida Gus Shinn and Que Sera Sera 50th Anniversary of First Aircraft Landing at the Geographic South Pole The First Time was Pretty Hairy Compiled by Billy-Ace Baker N 31 OCTOBER 1956, GUS SHINN BECAME THE FIRST Planning for this event started in May 2005 at the Opilot to land an aircraft at the Geographic South Pole. Antarctic Deep Freeze Association reunion in Biloxi, MS On 31 October 2006, the Gulf Coast Group (GCG) of when Gus declined, out of modesty, to be interviewed by a th the OAEA helped Gus celebrate the 50 Anniversary of this National Science Foundation video crew. It was determined major milestone in aviation and Antarctic history. The at that time if there was to be a 50th Anniversary celebration celebration was hosted by the National Museum of Navy in Pensacola we would have to start working on Gus to Aviation and was open to the public. Over 300 people allow us to honor him, his crew, and Que Sera Sera. It took attended the 1 p.m ceremony held in the Blue Angel Atrium almost a year and a lot of arm-twisting before Billy of the museum. The speakers, local dignitaries, and guests Blackwelder and I finally talked Gus into a small ceremony attended a luncheon commencing at 11 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • PECS Definitions and Rulings
    POLAR EXPEDITIONS CLASSIFICATION SCHEME (PECS) ! DEFINITIONS AND RULINGS The Polar Expeditions Classification Scheme is a grading system for extended, unmotorised polar expeditions, crossings or circumnavigations, collectively referred to as Journeys. Polar regions, modes of travel, start and end points, routes and types of support are defined under the scheme and give expeditioners guidance on how to classify, promote and immortalise their journey. PECS uses three tiers of Designation to grade, label and describe polar journeys - a Label (made up of Label Elements), a Description and a MAP Code. Tiers are only an indication of information density. PECS does not discriminate between Modes of Travel. Each Mode is classified under the scheme allowing same-mode journeys to be compared while allowing for superficial cross-comparison. PECS is able to accommodate new modes of unmotorised travel as they develop without impacting on labelling or definitions. Journeys using engines or motors for propulsion, for any part of the journey, are not covered by PECS. PECS concentrates primarily on journeys of more than 400km in Antarctica, Greenland and on the Arctic Ocean however journeys in other polar areas and of less than 400km one-way linear distance that do not include the Poles or significant features on their line of travel may be classified on an informal basis under this scheme. Journeys choosing to use PECS must abide by PECS terminology. Shorter journeys should be labelled accordingly ie. Last Degree South Pole or Double Degree North Pole etc. All rulings and determinations are at the discretion of the PECS Committee. POLAR EXPEDITIONS CLASSIFICATION SCHEME "1 VER190220 CONTENTS 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 Science Planning Summaries
    Find information about current Link to project web sites and USAP projects using the find information about the principal investigator, event research and people involved. number station, and other indexes. Science Program Indexes: 2010-2011 Find information about current USAP projects using the Project Web Sites principal investigator, event number station, and other Principal Investigator Index indexes. USAP Program Indexes Aeronomy and Astrophysics Dr. Vladimir Papitashvili, program manager Organisms and Ecosystems Find more information about USAP projects by viewing Dr. Roberta Marinelli, program manager individual project web sites. Earth Sciences Dr. Alexandra Isern, program manager Glaciology 2010-2011 Field Season Dr. Julie Palais, program manager Other Information: Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences Dr. Peter Milne, program manager Home Page Artists and Writers Peter West, program manager Station Schedules International Polar Year (IPY) Education and Outreach Air Operations Renee D. Crain, program manager Valentine Kass, program manager Staffed Field Camps Sandra Welch, program manager Event Numbering System Integrated System Science Dr. Lisa Clough, program manager Institution Index USAP Station and Ship Indexes Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station McMurdo Station Palmer Station RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer ARSV Laurence M. Gould Special Projects ODEN Icebreaker Event Number Index Technical Event Index Deploying Team Members Index Project Web Sites: 2010-2011 Find information about current USAP projects using the Principal Investigator Event No. Project Title principal investigator, event number station, and other indexes. Ainley, David B-031-M Adelie Penguin response to climate change at the individual, colony and metapopulation levels Amsler, Charles B-022-P Collaborative Research: The Find more information about chemical ecology of shallow- USAP projects by viewing individual project web sites.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Compiled by Mike Wing New Zealand Antarctic Society (Inc
    ANTARCTIC 1 Compiled by Mike Wing US bulldozer, 1: 202, 340, 12: 54, New Zealand Antarctic Society (Inc) ACECRC, see Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperation Research Centre Volume 1-26: June 2009 Acevedo, Capitan. A.O. 4: 36, Ackerman, Piers, 21: 16, Vessel names are shown viz: “Aconcagua” Ackroyd, Lieut. F: 1: 307, All book reviews are shown under ‘Book Reviews’ Ackroyd-Kelly, J. W., 10: 279, All Universities are shown under ‘Universities’ “Aconcagua”, 1: 261 Aircraft types appear under Aircraft. Acta Palaeontolegica Polonica, 25: 64, Obituaries & Tributes are shown under 'Obituaries', ACZP, see Antarctic Convergence Zone Project see also individual names. Adam, Dieter, 13: 6, 287, Adam, Dr James, 1: 227, 241, 280, Vol 20 page numbers 27-36 are shared by both Adams, Chris, 11: 198, 274, 12: 331, 396, double issues 1&2 and 3&4. Those in double issue Adams, Dieter, 12: 294, 3&4 are marked accordingly. Adams, Ian, 1: 71, 99, 167, 229, 263, 330, 2: 23, Adams, J.B., 26: 22, Adams, Lt. R.D., 2: 127, 159, 208, Adams, Sir Jameson Obituary, 3: 76, A Adams Cape, 1: 248, Adams Glacier, 2: 425, Adams Island, 4: 201, 302, “101 In Sung”, f/v, 21: 36, Adamson, R.G. 3: 474-45, 4: 6, 62, 116, 166, 224, ‘A’ Hut restorations, 12: 175, 220, 25: 16, 277, Aaron, Edwin, 11: 55, Adare, Cape - see Hallett Station Abbiss, Jane, 20: 8, Addison, Vicki, 24: 33, Aboa Station, (Finland) 12: 227, 13: 114, Adelaide Island (Base T), see Bases F.I.D.S. Abbott, Dr N.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003-2004 Science Planning Summary
    2003-2004 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project websites List of projects by principal investigator List of projects by USAP program List of projects by institution List of projects by station List of projects by event number digits List of deploying team members Teachers Experiencing Antarctica Scouting In Antarctica Technical Events Media Visitors 2003-2004 USAP Field Season USAP Station Schedules Click on the station name below to retrieve a list of projects supported by that station. Austral Summer Season Austral Estimated Population Openings Winter Season Station Operational Science Opening Summer Winter 20 August 01 September 890 (weekly 23 February 187 McMurdo 2003 2003 average) 2004 (winter total) (WinFly*) (mainbody) 2,900 (total) 232 (weekly South 24 October 30 October 15 February 72 average) Pole 2003 2003 2004 (winter total) 650 (total) 27- 34-44 (weekly 17 October 40 Palmer September- 8 April 2004 average) 2003 (winter total) 2003 75 (total) Year-round operations RV/IB NBP RV LMG Research 39 science & 32 science & staff Vessels Vessel schedules on the Internet: staff 25 crew http://www.polar.org/science/marine. 25 crew Field Camps Air Support * A limited number of science projects deploy at WinFly. 2003-2004 USAP Field Season Technical Events Every field season, the USAP sponsors a variety of technical events that are not scientific research projects but support one or more science projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-2005 Science Planning Summary
    2004-2005 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2004-2005 USAP Field Season Table of Contents Project Indexes Project Websites Station Schedules Technical Events Environmental and Health & Safety Initiatives 2004-2005 USAP Field Season Project Indexes Project websites List of projects by principal investigator List of projects by USAP program List of projects by institution List of projects by station List of projects by event number digits List of deploying team members Scouting In Antarctica Technical Events Media Visitors 2004-2005 USAP Field Season USAP Station Schedules Click on the station name below to retrieve a list of projects supported by that station. Austral Summer Season Austral Estimated Population Openings Winter Season Station Operational Science Openings Summer Winter 20 August 05 October 890 (weekly 23 February 187 McMurdo 2004 2004 average) 2004 (winter total) (WINFLY*) (Mainbody) 2,900 (total) 232 (weekly South 24 October 30 October 15 February 72 average) Pole 2004 2004 2004 (winter total) 650 (total) 34-44 (weekly 22 September 40 Palmer N/A 8 April 2004 average) 2004 (winter total) 75 (total) Year-round operations RV/IB NBP RV LMG Research 39 science & 32 science & staff Vessels Vessel schedules on the Internet: staff 25 crew http://www.polar.org/science/marine. 25 crew Field Camps Air Support * A limited number of science projects deploy at WinFly. 2004-2005 USAP Field Season Technical Events Every field season, the USAP sponsors a variety of technical events that are not scientific research projects but support one or more science projects.
    [Show full text]
  • PECS Definitions and Rulings.Pages
    POLAR EXPEDITIONS CLASSIFICATION SCHEME (PECS) ! DEFINITIONS AND RULINGS The Polar Expeditions Classification Scheme is a grading system for extended, unmotorised polar expeditions, crossings or circumnavigations, collectively referred to as Journeys. Polar regions, modes of travel, start and end points, routes and types of support are defined under the scheme and give expeditioners guidance on how to classify, promote and immortalise their journey. PECS uses three tiers of Designation to grade, label and describe polar journeys - a Label (made up of Label Elements), a Description and a MAP Code. Tiers are only an indication of information density. PECS does not discriminate between Modes of Travel. Each Mode is classified under the scheme allowing same-mode journeys to be compared while allowing for superficial cross-comparison. PECS is able to accommodate new modes of unmotorised travel as they develop without impacting on labelling or definitions. Journeys using engines or motors for propulsion, for any part of the journey, are not covered by PECS. PECS concentrates primarily on journeys of more than 400km in Antarctica, Greenland and on the Arctic Ocean however journeys in other polar areas and of less than 400km one-way linear distance that do not include the Poles or significant features on their line of travel may be classified on an informal basis under this scheme. Journeys choosing to use PECS must abide by PECS terminology. Shorter journeys should be labelled accordingly ie. Last Degree South Pole or Double Degree North Pole etc. All rulings and determinations are at the discretion of the PECS Committee. POLAR EXPEDITIONS CLASSIFICATION SCHEME "1 VER161219 CONTENTS 4.
    [Show full text]