DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DELEGATION FOR RELATIONS WITH AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND 12TH EP/NEW ZEALAND INTERPARLIAMENTARY MEETING 26 FEBRUARY - 5 MARCH 2006 AUCKLAND, WELLINGTON, CHRISTCHURCH CHAIRMAN'S REPORT The Delegation travelled to New Zealand from 26 February to 5 March. The delegation was headed by Mr Neil Parish (EPP-ED, United Kingdom). The full list of the participants is appended. MEPs held meetings at the highest level, in particular with the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Helen Clark; the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Hon. Margaret Wilson; the Foreign Minister, the Rt. Hon. Winston Peters; and the Leader of the National Party, Dr Don Brash. Members also met a wide range of Members of Parliament, including the Labour Party, the National Party, the New Zealand First Party, the United Future New Zealand Party and the Green Party. Meetings also took place with the Business Committee of the House of Representatives. On regular occasions during the entire visit the Delegation was accompanied by members of Parliament. The Delegation was briefed by the Heads of Mission of the Member States to New Zealand, including the Delegation of the European Commission, and met also representatives of agriculture, academia and the press. Key items discussed during the meetings were the EU-New Zealand relationship; Common Agriculture Policy reform; development aid to the Pacific region; New Zealand's free trade agreement with China; internal New Zealand politics, in particular the Mixed Member Proportional representation system (MMP) that has been in operation since 1996; the post-enlargement EU and the draft constitutional treaty; world affairs and global security. The Delegation thanks its interlocutors for the excellent exchanges; it looks forward to continuing the interparliamentary dialogue during the return visit to Europe by the Parliament of New Zealand in April 2006. The Chairman of the Delegation would also like to thank all Members for their support and help during the visit. The Chairman would also like to note that Mr Mike Fokker of the Visits and Ceremonial Office of the Department of Internal Affairs and Mrs Cheryl Ferguson of the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives were particularly helpful in dealing with all organisational aspects of the mission. The European Commission Delegation was also very supportive and assisted the parliamentarians during their time in New Zealand. PE 372.922 1 CR/610287EN.doc .25-26 February 2006 The delegation arrived on 25 and 26 February. They held an informal meeting at 1700hrs on 26 February at which the programme was outlined. Monday 27 February 2006 The delegation left Auckland accompanied by Mr Lindsay Tisch, National MP for Piako. They were subsequently joined by Diana Yates, List Labour MP. Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust 0930 - 1100hrs The delegation visited the Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust, which seeks to re- create the environment of New Zealand before mammals were introduced by human beings during the last 1000 years. Members were briefed by David Wallace, Chairman of the Trust. Maungatautari is a forested volcanic cone rising above the Waikato basin. The aim is to restore to the forest a diversity of endangered native flora and fauna, including the kiwi, saddleback and tuatara. NZ$ 14 million is required to build a pest-proof fence around the bush edge of Maungatautari and to create the largest restoration project and wildlife sanctuary in New Zealand. When completed the 47 kilometre fence will cover 3400 hectares. Fences have been constructed to date around two sections of 35 hectares and 65 hectares. The delegation learned that four kiwis had been released in the enclosure, which would provide a valuable refuge for this endangered species. It was noted in particular that farmers and environmentalists were working together on the project, and that it enjoyed huge local support. University of Waikato 1130 - 1330hrs On arrival at the university the delegation took part in a Maori welcoming ceremony. This was followed by a briefing on the Te Kotahitanga Educational Project. The project seeks to address the problem of underachievement of Maori and minority students in mainstream schools. The professional development/research project began in 2001 and is now in its third phase. It has involved nearly 20 schools, 500 teachers and thousands of Maori and non-Maori students throughout New Zealand. There has been a statistically significant improvement in results for both Maori and non-Maori students in schools where the project has been operating. Livestock Improvement Corporation 1400hrs - 1500hrs The delegation attended a series of briefings at the Livestock Improvement Corporation (LIC) The Corporation has a unique database on dairy herds in New Zealand, which provides information on traceability, genetic improvement systems and laboratory automation solutions. PE 372.922 2 CR/610287EN.doc LIC has an annual turnover of NZ$108 million and 26% is invested in product development. It has around 500 full time staff and 1,600 seasonal employees. It is a market leader in areas such as herd testing, milk analysis, herd recording (the "MINDA" service) and research and development. The MEPs learned that dairy farmers in New Zealand operate in a highly competitive market with no government subsidies and that New Zealand has the world's most productive dairy farms. Currently there are 12,751 dairy farms and 3,851,302 cows. The number of farms is, however, declining as the average sizes increase - currently they are 111 hectares with 2.75 cows per hectare. 95% of dairy products are exported and the total revenue in 2004 was US$7.7 billion. The absence of foot and mouth disease and BSE are great advantages and New Zealand dairy products have an extremely high reputation in the world. There was an additional briefing session on the effects of the recent EU Regulations for Importing Bovine Semen, which set out new rules on testing for the Infective Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR) virus that affects bulls. Dexcel - Greenfield Project 1505 - 1545hrs Dexcel ("Dairying Excellence") is a commercial trust established in 2001 by the New Zealand Dairy Board. It undertakes research and education activities and is funded by a direct levy on dairy farmers who own the company. The delegation witnessed a practical demonstration of the completely automated milking process taking place at Dexcel's Greenfield Project. The Project is located on an area of 43 hectares with 147 cows. Over 95% of the cows' foodstuff is pasture. The project involves milking 24 hours a day and the role of the staff is to monitor the process. Six to seven cows are milked every hour in each of the two paddocks. The aims of the five year project are to reduce labour costs, to improve product quality and to ensure the health and welfare of the animals. The process is currently more expensive than the traditional method of manual milking; nevertheless the project is particularly important in the light of the reduction in the number of young people who are prepared to go into farming in New Zealand. At present the average age of farmers is over 50. PE 372.922 3 CR/610287EN.doc Tuesday 28 February 2006 Meeting with Heads of Mission from EU member states, 0800 - 0910hrs The delegation held a working breakfast with the EU Heads of Mission and/or their representatives where they were given an update on current developments in New Zealand. Key points were as follows: The EU-New Zealand relationship has broadened in the last 20 years beyond a heavy concentration on agriculture. Cooperation on science and technology is now extremely important. Other important areas of cooperation include security and anti- terrorism, the fight against money laundering, and the environment. New Zealanders do not always appreciate how much development aid is currently being provided by the EU to the South Pacific, and there are unfounded fears that the EU is turning its attention away from the region. The EU is, in fact, the second largest donor to the South Pacific after Australia. The new Foreign Minister, Winston Peters, is likely to seek closer ties with the USA and consequently the nuclear issue will become less important. Nevertheless the Prime Minister, Helen Clark, and the Trade Minister, Phil Goff, are keeping a close interest in foreign policy. New Zealand is in the process of opening embassies and expanding trade with Asian countries Although Mr Peters is not in the Cabinet he is committed to following the government line in the area of the portfolio for which he is responsible. The same is the case for the Revenue Minister, Peter Dunne, who comes from the United Future Party. New Zealand needs to learn more about how the EU has developed since enlargement in particular because knowledge about the new member states (apart from the Commonwealth countries of Cyprus and Malta) is limited. Nevertheless the New Zealand side are very keen to develop links. United Future Party - 0925 - 1000hrs Members met with Peter Dunne (Party Leader and Minister of Revenue), Judy Turner (Deputy Leader), and Gordon Copeland (Party Whip). The United Future Party is in coalition with the Labour government and has agreed on a joint policy agenda of 15 points. Peter Dunne holds the Ministry of Revenue and has the right to attend Cabinet meetings when his portfolio is being discussed. At present the arrangement is working smoothly, although there are some areas of difference between the Labour Party and the United Future Party. In particular the United Future Party is more favourable to Taiwan, which is New Zealand's ninth largest trading partner (China is the eighth). United Future recognises Beijing as the legitimate government but maintains unofficial links with Taipei. United Future stands for the devolution of decision making to the lowest possible level.
Recommended publications
  • 20 Settler Society and Postcolonial Apologies in Australia and New

    20 Settler Society and Postcolonial Apologies in Australia and New

    sites: new series · vol 5 no 1 · 2008 – article – SETTLER SOCIETY AND POSTCOLONIAL APOLOGIES IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND Jennifer Lawn Abstract From the 1990s onward, collective apologies for historical injustices prolifer- ated in political arenas across the globe, usually in response to intense activism by wronged parties or their descendants. Addressing this turn to symbolic reconciliation, I ask how such apologies might realign relationships between the Crown, indigenous communities, and settler society, with particular focus on apologies for the stolen generations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children forcibly removed from their families in Australia, and on Treaty of Waitangi settlements in Aotearoa New Zealand. Interpretations of collective apologies as purely calculable, impossible, or self-interested transactions are rejected. Instead, I regard apologies as a powerful mode of discourse capable not only of acknowledging wrongdoing on the part of State authorities, but also of generating new forms of historical consciousness and collective identity within settler society. However, the extent of settler engagement in the politics of collective apologies varies greatly between Australia and New Zealand. introduction Observing a recent ‘spate of apologies for the mistakes of the past’, Deborah Montgomerie asks: The personal is, as the slogan goes, political. But does that mean that the converse is true too? Should we extend the courtesies and conventions of personal life to politics by apologising for our collec- tive misdemeanours? … Is this a matter of etiquette or intellectual substance? (2003: 4). Montgomerie is referring to the late twentieth-century proliferation of restitu- tion cases in which official bodies, governments, and institutions apologise for 20 SITES: New Series · Vol 5 No 1 · 2008 their roles in committing large-scale historical injustices.
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism

    Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism

    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
  • China's Political Influence Activities Under Xi Jinping Professor

    China's Political Influence Activities Under Xi Jinping Professor

    Magic Weapons: China's political influence activities under Xi Jinping Professor Anne-Marie Brady Global Fellow, Wilson Center, Washington, DC; Department of Political Science and International Relations University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand In September 2014 Xi Jinping gave a speech on the importance of united front work— political influence activities—calling it one of the CCP’s “magic weapons”. The Chinese government’s foreign influence activities have accelerated under Xi. China’s foreign influence activities have the potential to undermine the sovereignty and integrity of the political system of targeted states. Conference paper presented at the conference on “The corrosion of democracy under China’s global influence,” supported by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, and hosted in Arlington, Virginia, USA, September 16-17, 2017. Key points: • CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping is leading an accelerated expansion of political influence activities worldwide. • The expansion of these activities is connected to both the CCP government’s domestic pressures and foreign agenda. • The paper creates a template of the policies and modes of China’s expanded foreign influence activities in the Xi era. • The paper uses this template to examine the extent to which one representative small state, New Zealand, is being targeted by China’s new influence agenda. Executive Summary In June 2017 the New York Times and The Economist featured stories on China's political influence in Australia. The New York Times headline asked "Are Australia's Politics too Easy to Corrupt?,"1 while The Economist sarcastically referred to China as the "Meddle Country."2 The two articles were reacting to an investigation by Fairfax Media and ABC into the extent of China's political interference in Australia,3 that built on internal enquiries into the same issue by ASIO and Australia's Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet in 2015 and 2016.
  • Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand

    Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand

    FIFTIETH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 7 August 2013 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Freepost Parliament, Adams, Hon Amy Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 6831 Minister for the Environment Wellington 6160 (04) 817 6531 Minister for Communications Selwyn National [email protected] and Information Technology Associate Minister for Canter- 829 Main South Road, Templeton (03) 344 0418/419 bury Earthquake Recovery Christchurch Fax: (03) 344 0420 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Ardern, Jacinda List Labour Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9388 Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 472 7036 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 817 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6445 Ardern, Shane Taranaki–King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Auchinvole, Chris List National (04) 817 6936 Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9392 Bakshi, Kanwaljit Singh National List Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 473 0469 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Banks, Hon John Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Leader, ACT party Wellington 6160 Minister for Regulatory Reform [email protected] (04) 817 9999 Minister for Small Business ACT Epsom Fax
  • The 2008 Election: Reviewing Seat Allocations Without the Māori Electorate Seats June 2010

    The 2008 Election: Reviewing Seat Allocations Without the Māori Electorate Seats June 2010

    working paper The 2008 Election: Reviewing seat allocations without the Māori electorate seats June 2010 Sustainable Future Institute Working Paper 2010/04 Authors Wendy McGuinness and Nicola Bradshaw Prepared by The Sustainable Future Institute, as part of Project 2058 Working paper to support Report 8, Effective M āori Representation in Parliament : Working towards a National Sustainable Development Strategy Disclaimer The Sustainable Future Institute has used reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of such website or other source. Published Copyright © Sustainable Future Institute Limited, June 2010 ISBN 978-1-877473-56-2 (PDF) About the Authors Wendy McGuinness is the founder and chief executive of the Sustainable Future Institute. Originally from the King Country, Wendy completed her secondary schooling at Hamilton Girls’ High School and Edgewater College. She then went on to study at Manukau Technical Institute (gaining an NZCC), Auckland University (BCom) and Otago University (MBA), as well as completing additional environmental papers at Massey University. As a Fellow Chartered Accountant (FCA) specialising in risk management, Wendy has worked in both the public and private sectors.
  • What the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Aimed to Do, Why It Did Not Succeed and How It Can Be Repaired

    What the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Aimed to Do, Why It Did Not Succeed and How It Can Be Repaired

    169 WHAT THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT AIMED TO DO, WHY IT DID NOT SUCCEED AND HOW IT CAN BE REPAIRED Sir Geoffrey Palmer* This article, by the person who was the Minister responsible for the introduction and passage of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, reviews 25 years of experience New Zealand has had with the legislation. The NZ Bill of Rights Act does not constitute higher law or occupy any preferred position over any other statute. As the article discusses, the status of the NZ Bill of Rights Act has meant that while the Bill of Rights has had positive achievements, it has not resulted in the transformational change that propelled the initial proposal for an entrenched, supreme law bill of rights in the 1980s. In the context of an evolving New Zealand society that is becoming ever more diverse, more reliable anchors are needed to ensure that human rights are protected, the article argues. The article discusses the occasions upon which the NZ Bill of Rights has been overridden and the recent case where for the first time a declaration of inconsistency was made by the High Court in relation to a prisoner’s voting rights. In particular, a softening of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, as it applies in the particular conditions of New Zealand’s small unicameral legislature, is called for. There is no adequate justification for maintaining the unrealistic legal fiction that no limits can be placed on the manner in which the New Zealand Parliament exercises its legislative power.
  • Innovation in New Zealand Statute Law

    Innovation in New Zealand Statute Law

    WHAT IS DISTINCTIVE ABOUT NEW ZEALAND LAW AND THE NEW ZEALAND WAY OF DOING LAW - INNOVATION IN NEW ZEALAND STATUTE LAW Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer President, Law Commission Paper delivered to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Law Commission, Legislative Council Chamber, Parliament Buildings, Wellington, 25 August 2006 What is this paper about? 1 The threshold question is to define what this paper is about.1 Tests as to what is innovative tend to be subjective. What is meant by “innovative” in the first place? The Oxford English Dictionary makes it plain that innovation is the action of innovating; the introduction of novelties; the alteration of what is established by the introduction of new elements or forms. In one sense, every statute is an innovation. The term is also susceptible to a distinction between those statutes that are innovative as to form and those that are innovative as to policy. Some statutes are known for the novelty and boldness of their policy. Others for the use of intricate and novel legislative techniques, for example the claw back provisions of the Treaty of Waitangi (State Enterprises) Act 1988.2 Some lawyers may admire particular legislative techniques that have no great impact except to implement faithfully the policy of the Act. And that policy may be of no great significance. On the other hand, statutes that are simple in drafting terms may raise enormous controversy leading to a difficult and long parliamentary passage. 2 Contemplating the difficulty of selection, I informally surveyed the Law Commission lawyers as to what they considered to be the three top innovative pieces of legislation in New Zealand.
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices

    Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices

    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
  • Ak2 : the Coming of Age of a New Auckland

    Ak2 : the Coming of Age of a New Auckland

    AK2 : THE COMING OF AGE A NEW AUCKLAND PREVIOUSLY UNAVAILABLE PREVIOUSLY AK2 : THE COMING OF AGE OF A NEW AUCKLAND AK2: The Coming of Age of a New Auckland Published June 2014 by: Previously Unavailable www.previously.co [email protected] © 2014 Previously Unavailable Researched, written, curated & edited by: James Hurman, Principal, Previously Unavailable Acknowledgements: My huge thanks to all 52 of the people who generously gave their time to be part of this study. To Paul Dykzeul of Bauer Media who gave me access to Bauer’s panel of readers to complete the survey on Auckland pride and to Tanya Walshe, also of Bauer Media, who organised and debriefed the survey. To Jane Sweeney of Anthem who connected me with many of the people in this study and extremely kindly provided me with the desk upon which this document has been created. To the people at ATEED, Cooper & Company and Cheshire Architects who provided the photos. And to Dick Frizzell who donated his time and artistic eforts to draw his brilliant caricature of a New Aucklander. You’re all awesome. Thank you. Photo Credits: p.14 – Basketballers at Wynyard – Derrick Coetzee p.14 – Britomart signpost – Russell Street p.19 - Auckland from above - Robert Linsdell p.20 – Lantern Festival food stall – Russell Street p.20 – Art Exhibition – Big Blue Ocean p.40 – Auckland Museum – Adam Selwood p.40 – Diner Sign – Abaconda Management Group p.52 – Lorde – Constanza CH SOMETHING’S UP IN AUCKLAND “We had this chance that came up in Hawkes Bay – this land, two acres, right on the beach.
  • ELECTORAL CHANGE, INERTIA and CAMPAIGNS in NEW ZEALAND the First Modern FPP Campaign in 1987 and the First MMP Campaign in 1996

    ELECTORAL CHANGE, INERTIA and CAMPAIGNS in NEW ZEALAND the First Modern FPP Campaign in 1987 and the First MMP Campaign in 1996

    PARTY POLITICS VOL 9. No.5 pp. 601–618 Copyright © 2003 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi www.sagepublications.com ELECTORAL CHANGE, INERTIA AND CAMPAIGNS IN NEW ZEALAND The First Modern FPP Campaign in 1987 and the First MMP Campaign in 1996 David Denemark ABSTRACT Electoral change creates important and competing incentives for political parties, parliamentary elites and candidates to transform their campaign techniques in order to maximize votes under the new realities – a process constrained by continued reliance on familiar techniques. In this article I examine two significant moments of electoral change in New Zealand – from partisan stability to dealignment in the late 1980s, and from an SMP/plurality system to Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) represen- tation in 1996 – as a way of exploring inertia and change in the trans- formation of campaigns at the constituency level. Drawing on findings from in-depth interviews conducted with individuals responsible for the parties’ campaigns in the 1987 and 1996 New Zealand general elections, I explore the extent to which political campaign elites, parliamentarians and candidates responded to incentives to adopt a fundamentally new election campaign logic – in these two cases, dictated by the new tactical centrality of marginal seats and geographically defined constituencies in the modern first-past-the-post (FPP) campaign, and then by the ascend- ancy in their place of the party list vote, issue constituencies and nation- wide campaigns under MMP. KEY WORDS campaigns constituency electoral change mixed member proportional New Zealand Introduction Election campaigns – their strategies, techniques and technologies – are the product of the electoral systems within which they are waged (Katz, 1980).
  • 19 March 2019

    19 March 2019

    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION TUESDAY, 19 MARCH 2019 Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable LINDA DESSAU, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable KEN LAY, AO, APM The ministry Premier ........................................................ The Hon. DM Andrews, MP Deputy Premier and Minister for Education ......................... The Hon. JA Merlino, MP Treasurer, Minister for Economic Development and Minister for Industrial Relations ........................................... The Hon. TH Pallas, MP Minister for Transport Infrastructure ............................... The Hon. JM Allan, MP Minister for Crime Prevention, Minister for Corrections, Minister for Youth Justice and Minister for Victim Support .................... The Hon. BA Carroll, MP Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change, and Minister for Solar Homes ................................................. The Hon. L D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Child Protection and Minister for Disability, Ageing and Carers ....................................................... The Hon. LA Donnellan, MP Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality and Minister for Creative Industries ............................................ The Hon. MP Foley, MP Attorney-General and Minister for Workplace Safety ................. The Hon. J Hennessy, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Ports and Freight
  • House of Representatives List of Members

    House of Representatives List of Members

    FORTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 1 September 2008 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Anderton, Hon Jim Freepost Parliament, (04) 470 6550 Leader, Progressive Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 495 8441 Minister of Agriculture Wellington 6160 Minister for Biosecurity Minister of Fisheries Wigram Progressive [email protected] Minister of Forestry Minister responsible for the 296 Selwyn St, Spreydon, Christchurch (03) 365 5459 Public Trust PO Box 33 164, Barrington, Christchurch Fax (03) 365 6173 Associate Minister of Health [email protected] Associate Minister for Tertiary Education Freepost Parliament (04) 471 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6447 Ardern MP, Shane Taranaki – King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 470 6936 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 439 6445 Auchinvole, Chris List National Wellington 6160 [email protected] (04) 470 6572 Barker, Hon Rick Freepost Parliament Fax (04) 472 8036 Minister of Internal Affairs Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Minister of Civil Defence Wellington 6160 Minister for Courts List Labour [email protected] Minister of Veterans’ Affairs Associate Minister of Justice PO Box 1245, Hastings (06) 876 8966 Fax (06) 876 4908 Freepost Parliament (04) 471 9906 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04)