DOCSLIB.ORG

Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr. Anna Hardin, (soon to be Dr.) Rutger Jansma, and Dr. Jason Massey, as well as my “writing buddies” Hilary Chart and Ethan Wilensky-Lanford. In Christchurch, Dr. Rawiri Te Maire Tau showed me the meaning of manaakitanga by welcoming me with open arms at the University of Canterbury and providing access to research sites and participants that would have been impossible without his assistance. Kirsty Ameriks and Virginia Irvine were critical allies in integrating me into the community of students and researchers at the Ngāi Tahu Research Centre. Tui Falwasser, Dr. Jessica Halliday, Nigel Harris, Trent Hiles, Joseph Hullen, Rob Kerr, Te Marino Lenihan, Glenn Livingstone, Sacha McMeeking, Don Miskell, Jo i Petrie, Huia Reriti, Aroha Reriti-Crofts, Arapata Reuben, Dr. Ryan Reynolds, Rich Sewell, Jenny Smith, Jamie Stevenson, Regan Stokes, Deon Swiggs, Dr. Eruerua Prendergast-Tarena, Corban Te Aika, Debbie Tikao, Diane Turner, Grace Uivel, Robyn Wallace, and Coralie Winn all shared their time and their thoughts on the meaning of recovery in Christchurch. The story I tell in these pages belongs to them. Jonathan Burn, Gemma Burrowes, Clinton Burt, Timothy Hitchcox, Ryoko Mukai, Sue Ritchie, Keefe Robinson, Robyn Robinson, Taylor Swan, and Rupert Wisternoff all helped to make Christchurch feel like home. To my parents—Judy and Richard Chenu, David and Linda Kensinger—thank you for your unwavering encouragement and financial support. Jim and Linda Artiano opened their home to me whenever I travelled to the field, allowing me to break up the long flights between Minnesota and Christchurch. Finally, to my partner Zachary Kempen, thank you for your patience while I completed this dissertation. ii For Nana, Grandma Filbert, and Mema. iii Abstract This dissertation is an ethnographic case study of the Christchurch Central City Rebuild. Following a series of severe earthquakes near Christchurch, New Zealand between September 2010 and February 2011, the central government declared a state of emergency and passed the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 (CER Act). This act mandated the creation of a new governing body, the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority, to oversee the development and implementation of a recovery strategy and plan for the Central City to be developed in cooperation with the Christchurch City Council and Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, the local Māori tribal authority. I analyze the structure of power established by the post-earthquake recovery legislation through the lens of Rebuild discourse, a discursive regime comprised of multiple political projects that each engaged in recovery in particular ways to enact their specific vision of what future Christchurch ought to be. I argue that the passage of the CER Act and the structure of power it created in post-earthquake Christchurch drew on the legacy of New Zealand’s settler-colonial history to enable the neoliberal settler state in its efforts to dispossess local Christchurch residents of access to their city while also maintaining the ongoing dispossession of the local indigenous group Ngāi Tahu in order to serve the interests of economic and political elites iv Table of Contents List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………….vi List of Organizational Acronyms, Names, and other Abbreviations…………………...viii A Note on Māori Language Use……………………………………………………….....ix Glossary of Māori Terms and Place Names……………………………………………....x Introduction: Unsettling the Settler State………………………………………………….1 Chapter 1: Recovering Christchurch……………………………………………………..44 Chapter 2: Rebranding Christchurch…………………………………………………….75 Chapter 3: Reclaiming Christchurch……………………………………………………100 Chapter 4: Repossessing Christchurch………………………………………………….135 Chapter 5: Revealing Christchurch……………………………………………………..166 Conclusion: Repairing Christchurch……………………………………………………191 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………196 v List of Figures Figure 1: Road closed ahead. Photo by the author, July 2013, pg. 9. Figure 2: Steel frame skeletons and dilapidated remains. Photo by the author, July 2013, pg. 10. Figure 3: Fenced off from the public. Photo by the author, July 2013, pg. 11. Figure 4: Steel supports. Photo by the author, March 2015, pg. 11. Figure 5: My house on Gloucester Street in Central Christchurch. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 12. Figure 6: Corner of New Regent Street and Gloucester Street. Photo by the author, 2015, pg. 19. Figure 7: "Coming Here": site of the future Convention Centre Precinct. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 20. Figure 8: Site of the future Performing Arts Precinct. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 21. Figure 9: Outdoor Reading Room. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 22. Figure 10: Eyes on the City, February 9, 2015. Photo courtesy of Gapfiller, pg. 23. Figure 11 The Port Hills as seen from the beach at New Brighton. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 50. Figure 12: Christchurch as seen from the Port Hills. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 51. Figure 13: Map of Christchurch's street grid prepared by Edward Jollie in 1850. Image courtesy of CERA, pg. 59. Figure 14: CERA's Blueprint for Central Christchurch. Source: Christchurch Central Recovery Plan, March 2014, pg. 76. Figure 15: Canterbury Museum, Photo by the author, July 2013, pg. 81. Figure 16: Christchurch Cathedral as it appeared before the earthquake. Photo by the Author, March 2007, pg. 81. Figure 17: Canterbury A&P Show, an annual celebration of the region's rural heritage. Photo by the author, 2015, pg. 82. Figure 18: Christchurch Central Anchor Projects and Precincts. Image Courtesy of CERA, pg. 85. Figure 19: Future Christchurch Visionarium, Cathedral Square. Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 86. Figure 20: Future site of the Kua Hua Ake Te Ao Community Garden and Cafe before work was begun on clearing the sit. Photo by the author, July 2013, pg. 94. vi Figure 21: Creating community bonds by activating vacant space. Photo by the author, May 2015, pg. 94. Figure 22: In progress: Linwood Community Cafe and Garden. Photo by the author, June 2015, pg. 95. Figure 23: Te Whare Roimata kaumatua (elders) and tamariki (children) performing a karakia (blessing) over the garden area on opening day. Photo by the author, July 2015, pg. 95. Figure 24: Kua Hua Ake Te Ao Community Cafe and Garden opening day hui. Photo by the author, July 2015, pg. 96. Figure 25: Kua Hua Ake Te Ao Community Cafe and Garden as it appeared in February 2016, pg. 96. Figure 26: Te Wai Pounamou, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu headquarters. Photo by the author, March 2015, pg. 101. Figure 27: Tuahiwi marae, ancestral marae of Ngāi Tūāhuriri whanau. Photo by the author, June 2015, pg. 119. Figure 28: Hine Paaka Christchurch Bus Interchange. Photo courtesy of Otakaro Ltd., pg. 129. Figure 29: Gapfiller volunteer "working-bee" at The Commons in Central Christchurch. Photo by the author, May 2015, pg. 136. Figure 30: “DEMOCRACY NOPE.” Photo by the author, 2013, pg. 147. Figure 31: Recovery art at the Smash Palace. Photo by the author, September 2015. Pg. 148 Figure 32: Greening the Rubble's "Gardens of Tranquility." Photo by the author, February 2015, pg. 157. Figure 33: "EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE ALRIGHT" Installation by Martin Creed, Te Puna Waiwhetu Christchurch Art Gallery 2015. Photo by the author, pg. 207. vii List of Organizational Acronyms, Names and other Abbreviations This is a list of commonly used institutional and organizational acronyms and names that appear throughout the dissertation. CCC: Christchurch City Council, local governing body for the Christchurch municipal area CCDU: Christchurch Central Development Unit, organization created by CERA responsible for overseeing anchor project delivery CCRP: Christchurch Central Recovery Plan, a recovery plan developed by CERA, TRoNT, and CCC that outlines the 17 anchor projects and precincts that served as the focus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake of 22 February 2011
    THE MW 6.3 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT THE CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT Sean Wilkinson Matthew Free Damian Grant David Boon Sarah Paganoni Anna Mason Elizabeth Williams Stuart Fraser Jenny Haskell Earthquake Field Investigation Team Institution of Structural Engineers 47 - 58 Bastwick Street London EC1V 3PS Tel 0207235 4535 Fax 0207235 4294 Email: [email protected] June 2011 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. REGIONAL TECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING 6 3. SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS 12 4. NEW ZEALAND BUILDING STOCK AND DESIGN PRACTICE 25 5. PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS 32 6. PERFORMANCE OF LIFELINES 53 7. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS 62 8. DISASTER MANAGEMENT 96 9. ECONOMIC LOSSES AND INSURANCE 108 10. CONCLUSIONS 110 11. REFERENCES 112 APPENDIX A: DETAILED RESIDENTIAL DAMAGE SURVEY 117 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their thanks to the many individuals and organisations that have assisted with the EEFIT mission to Christchurch and in the preparation of this report. We thank Arup for enabling Matthew Free to attend this mission and the British Geological Survey for allowing David Boon to attend. We would also like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for providing funding for Sean Wilkinson, Damian Grant, Elizabeth Paganoni and Sarah Paganoni to join the team. Their continued support in enabling UK academics to witness the aftermath of earthquakes and the effects on structures and the communities they serve is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Sept-Oct 2011 Gtr Progress
    Greening the Rubble Project September-October 2011 News Monthly progress report from Christchurch Project Worker to Living Streets Aotearoa Executive (managers) and to 'Make Shift' Steering Group (advisors, including CCC.) These mid-month reports coincide with financial reporting to LSA, and aim to brief the participants in Make-Shift Steering Group and Strategy meetings, set for Tuesday 25 October. Wet weather has curtailed a few outdoor sessions for volunteers, but overall this has been a productive period. We have new volunteers coming forward most weeks, additional sponsors secured and more sites being offered than we can work on at once, so a wait list is emerging. In Sept - our daffodils on Victoria Street and at right - Headlines are: de-construction of Victoria Green has begun, with relocation of gabions under Kowhai flower buds look healthy although the way to three sites; landscape designs are prepared for these three sites and commissioned for transplanted trees have lost many leaves after their a new roadside trio near the Lichfield Temporary Bus Exchange; outdoor furniture has been move to planters. Kowhai subsequently in flower. built for us by Hagley Community College students; and we are planning contributions of materials to two sites being organised by others: trees and path surfacing for the landscape at ‘Restart’ container shops in Cashel Mall (Tony Milne for Lincoln Uni.) and turf for a summer artwork installation site in Sydenham (Peter Majendie, with CCC). Over $1,300 more has arrived in donations in September through the ‘Silty’ block sales by Urban Paving Ltd. An additional site in Ferry Road has been informally surveyed and feasibility assessment started.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnection to Cleared Site in Christchurch Architecture for the Rememberer
    Reconnection to Cleared Site in Christchurch Architecture for the Rememberer Abigail Michelle Thompson A thesis submitted in ful! lment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture (professional), The University of Auckland, 2012 Fig 1: Project. Surface study model by author. Abstract The loss of life and buildings due to the devastating and continuing earthquakes in Canterbury (since 9th September, 2010) have created a need to examine the issue of memory with concerns to architecture in a New Zealand context. This thesis was initiated with concern to addressing the cleared (destroyed, demolished) buildings of Christchurch and architecture’s role in reconnecting Cantabrians mnemonically to the cleared sites in their city. This is an investigation of architecture’s ability to trigger memories in order to speci! cally address the disorientation experienced by Cantabrians subsequent to the loss of built fabric in their city. The design intention is to propose an architectural method for reconnecting people’s memories with site, which will have implications to other sites throughout the city of Christchurch. Consequently, two signi! cant sites of destruction have been chosen, the Methodist Church site at 309 Durham St (community) and the house at 69 Sherborne St (domestic). With the only original material left on these cleared sites being the ground itself, two issues were made apparent. Firstly, that ground should play a signi! cant role in substantiating the memory of the site(s), and secondly the necessary task of designing a mnemonic language without tangible links (other than ground). Collective memory is examined with regards to theory by Maurice Halbwachs, Piere Nora, and Peter Carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations and Consents Committee 18 June 2015
    REGULATION AND CONSENTS COMMITTEE AGENDA THURSDAY, 18 JUNE 2015 AT 9AM IN COMMITTEE ROOM 1, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET Committee: Councillor David East (Chair) Councillors Tim Scandrett (Deputy Chair), Ali Jones, Glenn Livingstone and Paul Lonsdale Principal Advisor Committee Adviser Peter Sparrow Barbara Strang Telephone: 941-8462 Telephone: 941-5216 INDEX ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. PART C 1. APOLOGIES 1 PART B 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST 1 PART B 3. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 1 PART B 4 BRIEFINGS 1 PART B 5. UPDATE OF THE BUILDING CONTROL AND CITY REBUILD GROUP 3 PART B 6. MONTHLY REPORT ON RESOURCE CONSENTS 11 1 REGULATION AND CONSENTS COMMITTEE 18. 6. 2015 1. APOLOGIES 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have. 3. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 4. BRIEFINGS 4.1 Councillor Tim Scandrett will provide the Committee with a verbal update from the Mayoral Quality Regulation and Review Taskforce 4.2 Unit Manager from the Building Control and City Rebuild Group will brief the Committee on the Continuous Improvement Programme. 2 3 REGULATION AND CONSENTS COMMITTEE 18 .6. 2015 5. UPDATE OF THE BUILDING CONTROL AND CITY REBUILD GROUP Contact Contact Details Executive Leadership Team Building Control and City Y Peter Sparrow: 5018 Member responsible: Rebuild Director Officer responsible: Residential Consent Unit Y Mark Urlich 8106 Manager Author: Residential Consent Unit Y Mark Urlich 8106 Manager 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide the Regulation and Consents Committee with the May 2015 update of the Building Control and City Rebuild Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon Runners Wary of Cracks Zontal Rather Than Vertical
    press.co.nz SATURDAY & SUNDAY, JUNE 4-5, 2011 Retail $2.60 New faults fail to dull optimism Paul Gorman findings released yesterday are 25km long. While it had the Science reporter preliminary and that more potential to generate a quake of research is needed. between magnitude 6.0 and 7.0, Three confirmed new faults and The most important missing there was ‘‘no strong evidence’’ two other areas of likely active piece of the puzzle are results from aftershocks were migrating off- faults have been identified near the underground surveying of shore onto any fault structures in Christchurch by scientists what has become known as ‘‘the Pegasus Bay, he said. examining seismic hazards around gap’’. Pettinga said the sub-surface the city. Survey lines in the aftershock- Port Hills fault, responsible for the Extensive surveying over the rich area between the eastern end deadly February 22 magnitude 6.3 past two months has uncovered a of the Greendale Fault and the quake, showed up on a survey 25-kilometre-long fault under the western tip of the Port Hills fault along the beach from Waimairi sea off Kaiapoi. Two faults run were completed only last Saturday. Beach to the tip of Southshore, as almost directly below central Canterbury University geologi- did another less clear fault further Christchurch and two patches cal sciences Professor Jarg Pet- north. containing possible small faults – tinga , who has directed the A north-south survey line down one off the Brighton coast and the seismic surveying work, said the Barbadoes St also showed an second just north of Port Levy and analysis was under way but it underground fault below about Pigeon Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral Working Group Recommendation Report
    CATHEDRAL WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 Released by the Minister supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration This document and its contents are confidential and shall not be distributed, published, copied or reproduced without the express written permission of the Minister Supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration and the Church Property Trustees. VERSION ISSUE DATE REASON FOR ISSUE AUTHOR APPROVED FOR ISSUE 1 28.10.16 Draft for Review Bianca Hurrell, RCP Marcus Read, RCP 2 31.10.16 Draft to include Bianca Hurrell, RCP Marcus Read, RCP comments from Working Group Chair Regeneration 3 01.11.16 Edited and Proofed Anna Komink, Axiom Marcus Read, RCP Final Draft to CWG / Bianca Hurrell, RCP 4 07.11.16 Updates following Bianca Hurrell, RCP / Marcus Read, RCP / CWG meeting Anna Komink, Axiom Geoff Dangerfield, CWG Christchurch 5 21.11.16 Updates as Geoff Dangerfield, Geoff Dangerfield, provided to CWG CWG / Marcus Read, CWG / Marcus Read, for review RCP RCP 6 24.11.16 Final Draft providedGreater Geoff Dangerfield, Marcus Read, RCP / to CWG for review CWG / Marcus Read, Geoff Dangerfield, RCP CWG 7 25.11.16 Final Copy Geoff Dangerfield, Geoff Dangerfield, CWG / Marcus Read, CWG / Marcus Read, RCP RCP supporting Minister the by Released ii CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Recommendations 7 3.0 Introduction 9 4.0 Background and Context 12 5.0 Values and Requirements of the ChristChurch Cathedral 13 6.0 Heritage and Archaeological Review Regeneration16 7.0 Structural Review 21 8.0 Regeneration of the Square 27 9.0 Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand
    FIFTIETH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 7 August 2013 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Freepost Parliament, Adams, Hon Amy Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 6831 Minister for the Environment Wellington 6160 (04) 817 6531 Minister for Communications Selwyn National [email protected] and Information Technology Associate Minister for Canter- 829 Main South Road, Templeton (03) 344 0418/419 bury Earthquake Recovery Christchurch Fax: (03) 344 0420 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Ardern, Jacinda List Labour Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9388 Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 472 7036 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 817 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6445 Ardern, Shane Taranaki–King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Auchinvole, Chris List National (04) 817 6936 Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament, Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings (04) 817 9392 Bakshi, Kanwaljit Singh National List Wellington 6160 Fax: (04) 473 0469 [email protected] Freepost Parliament Banks, Hon John Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Leader, ACT party Wellington 6160 Minister for Regulatory Reform [email protected] (04) 817 9999 Minister for Small Business ACT Epsom Fax
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic, Geotechnical, and Seismologic Context And
    GEOLOGIC, GEOTECHNICAL, AND SEISMOLOGIC CONTEXT AND DISPLACEMENTS OF LAND AND BUILDINGS AT SELECTED SITES OF CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL OWNED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DAMAGED DURING THE 2010-2011 CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF KEY FINDINGS Dr. Mark Quigley Associate Professor of Active Tectonics and Geomorphology School of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne, and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury On behalf of report co-authors Dr. Brendon Bradley Associate Professor of Engineering Seismology and Director of QuakeCORE Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury Dr. Bruce Deam Senior Research Engineer Tonkin & Taylor Ltd – Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Project Office 15 Barry Hogan Place, Addington, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand With assistance in map production from Elyse Armstrong Tonkin & Taylor Ltd – Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Project Office University of Canterbury Consultancy Report CN4600001360 25 November 2015 INTRODUCTION The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (CES) in New Zealand’s South Island caused extensive and recurrent damage to land and infrastructure within the Central Business District (CBD) of Christchurch. The University of Canterbury (Dr. Mark Quigley and Dr. Brendon Bradley) and Tonkin and Taylor (Dr. Bruce Deam) was commissioned by Christchurch City Council to investigate land and building damage for seven key CCC assets listed in Table 1. WGS84 coordinates and completion dates for the significant structures are also listed for
    [Show full text]
  • 80 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    80 bus time schedule & line map 80 Lincoln/Parklands View In Website Mode The 80 bus line (Lincoln/Parklands) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) City: 9:54 PM (2) City & Ara Institute: 8:14 AM (3) Lincoln: 6:54 AM (4) Lincoln Via City: 6:52 AM - 9:22 PM (5) Parklands: 7:30 AM (6) Parklands Via City: 7:21 AM - 8:52 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 80 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 80 bus arriving. Direction: City 80 bus Time Schedule 42 stops City Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 9:54 PM Monday 10:54 PM Lincoln University 21 Ellesmere Junction Road, New Zealand Tuesday 9:54 PM Gerald St Near Springs Rd Wednesday 9:54 PM Gerald St Near Murray Pl Thursday 9:54 PM 55 Gerald Street, New Zealand Friday 9:54 PM Gerald St Near West Belt Saturday 9:54 PM 22 Gerald Street, Lincoln Gerald St Near Kildare Tce Kildare Terrace, Lincoln 80 bus Info James St Near Boundary Rd Direction: City 25 James Street, New Zealand Stops: 42 Trip Duration: 36 min Birchs Rd Near Grangewood Dr Line Summary: Lincoln University, Gerald St Near 1 Liffeyƒelds Drive, New Zealand Springs Rd, Gerald St Near Murray Pl, Gerald St Near West Belt, Gerald St Near Kildare Tce, James St Near Birchs Rd Near Barton Fields Dr Boundary Rd, Birchs Rd Near Grangewood Dr, Birchs 593 Birchs Road, New Zealand Rd Near Barton Fields Dr, Birchs Rd Near Robinsons Rd, Birchs Rd Near Hamptons Rd, Birchs Rd Near Birchs Rd Near Robinsons Rd Glenwood Dr, Springs Rd Near Birchs Rd, Prebbleton, 342 Birchs Road, New Zealand Springs
    [Show full text]
  • Members Contact Details As at 10 November 2020.Xlsx
    Contact Salutation/Title Job Title Electorate Party Parliament Email Allan, Kiritapu Hon Member for East Coast East Coast Labour Party [email protected] Andersen, Virginia Member for Hutt South Hutt South Labour Party [email protected] Ardern, Jacinda Rt. Hon. Member for Mt Albert Mt Albert Labour Party [email protected] Baillie, Christopher List Member ACT New Zealand [email protected] Bayly, Andrew Member for Port Waikato Port Waikato National Party [email protected] Belich, Camilla List Member Labour Party [email protected] Bennett, David Hon List Member National Party [email protected] Bennett, Glen Member for New Plymouth New Plymouth Labour Party [email protected] Bishop, Christopher List Member National Party [email protected] Boyack-Mayer, Rachel Member for Nelson Nelson Labour Party [email protected] Bridges, Simon Hon Member for Tauranga Tauranga National Party [email protected] Brooking, Rachel List Member Labour Party [email protected] Brown, Simeon Member for Pakuranga Pakuranga National Party [email protected] Brownlee, Gerard Hon List Member National Party [email protected] Cameron, Mark List Member ACT New Zealand [email protected] Chen, Naisi List Member Labour Party [email protected] Chhour, Karen List Member ACT New Zealand [email protected] Clark, David Hon. Dr. Member for Dunedin Dunedin Labour Party [email protected] Coffey, Tamati List Member Labour Party [email protected] Collins, Judith Hon Member for Papakura Papakura National Party [email protected] Court, Simon List Member ACT New Zealand [email protected] Craig, Elizabeth Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Electorates and Electoral Populations: 2013 Census Embargoed Until 10:45Am – 07 October 2013
    Number of Electorates and Electoral Populations: 2013 Census Embargoed until 10:45am – 07 October 2013 Key facts The number of electorates will increase from 70 to 71 at the next general election. The number of North Island general electorates will increase from 47 to 48. The number of Māori electorates will remain at seven. The number of general electorates in the South Island is set at 16 by the Electoral Act 1993. In a 120-seat parliament (excluding any overhang seats), a total of 71 electorates will result in 49 list seats being allocated. This is one less list seat than in the 2011 General Election. The Representation Commission can now review the electorate boundaries for the next general election. Liz MacPherson 7 October 2013 Government Statistician ISBN 978-0-478-40854-6 Commentary Electoral populations increase since 2006 Number of electorates will increase Twenty-one current electorates vary from quota by more than 5 percent Enrolments on Māori roll increase Electoral populations increase since 2006 The general electoral population of the North Island is 2,867,110, up 176,673 (6.6 percent) from 2006. For the South Island it is 954,871, up 33,872 (3.7 percent) from 2006. Based on the latest electoral population figures, the electoral population quota (the average population in an electorate) is 59,731 people for each North Island general electorate and 59,679 people for each South Island general electorate. The general electoral population quota has increased by 2,488 people for the North Island and by 2,117 people for the South Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltccp) 2009-2019
    Living Streets Canterbury submission on draft Environment Canterbury Long Term Council Community Plan (LTCCP) 2009-2019 27 April 2009 Name of Submitter and Living Streets Canterbury Co-ordinator, Wendy Everingham, on Submitting Organisation behalf of Living Streets Canterbury Postal Address Living Streets Canterbury C/O of Wendy Everingham Living Streets Canterbury Co-ordinator 1/4 Harmans Road Lyttelton Phone 328 9093 or 328 8359 Email [email protected] Introducing Living Streets Canterbury Living Streets Canterbury is a Christchurch based pedestrian advocacy group established in 2004 as a branch of Living Streets Aotearoa. Everyone walks and uses the footpaths some people do so with aid or support. Living Streets represents the interests of all types of walkers,many of whom also use public transport. Living Streets Aotearoa vision is “More people walking more often”. For more information about Living Streets Aotearoa see www.livingstreets.org.nz We wish to speak to our submission in Christchurch. Please send Living Streets Canterbury at the above address a copy of the Officers' Report as soon as it is available, to enable our group to make a more efficient and useful oral submission. General comments The Government's priorities for land transport have a focus on the sustainable movement of people and freight (Government Policy Statement on Land Transport Funding 2009/10-2018/19). The Canterbury Regional Land Transport Strategy 2008–2018 (RLTS) sets the direction for land transport in the region over the next ten years and also emphasises sustainability. The Canterbury Transport Regional Implementation Plan (2008-2038) (CTRIP) has been developed specifically to ensure there is a coordinated approach to delivering the RLTS so should reflect the priorities of the RLTS.
    [Show full text]