DOCSLIB.ORG

GEOTECHNICAL RECONNAISSANCE of the 2011 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE Version 1: 15 August 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEOTECHNICAL RECONNAISSANCE of the 2011 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE Version 1: 15 August 2011 GEOTECHNICAL RECONNAISSANCE OF THE 2011 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE Version 1: 15 August 2011 (photograph by Gillian Needham) EDITORS Misko Cubrinovski – NZ Lead (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Russell A. Green – US Lead (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA) Liam Wotherspoon (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS (alphabetical order) John Allen – (TRI/Environmental, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) Brendon Bradley – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Aaron Bradshaw – (University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA) Jonathan Bray – (UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA) Misko Cubrinovski – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Greg DePascale – (Fugro/WLA, Christchurch, New Zealand) Russell A. Green – (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA) Rolando Orense – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) Thomas O’Rourke – (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA) Michael Pender – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) Glenn Rix – (Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, USA) Donald Wells – (AMEC Geomatrix, Oakland, CA, USA) Clint Wood – (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA) Liam Wotherspoon – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) OTHER CONTRIBUTORS (alphabetical order) Brady Cox – (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA) Duncan Henderson – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Lucas Hogan – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) Patrick Kailey – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Sam Lasley – (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA) Kelly Robinson – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Merrick Taylor – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Anna Winkley – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Josh Zupan – (University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS 3.0 GEOLOGICAL ASPECTS 4.0 LIQUEFACTION AND LATERAL SPREADING 5.0 IMPROVED GROUND 6.0 STOPBANKS 7.0 BRIDGES 8.0 LIFELINES 9.0 LANDSLIDES AND ROCKFALLS 1. INTRODUCTION The 22 February 2011, Mw6.2-6.3 Christchurch earthquake is the most costly earthquake to affect New Zealand, causing 181 fatalities and severely damaging thousands of residential and commercial buildings, and a significant portion of the city lifelines and infrastructure. However, the scientific and engineering significance of this earthquake goes well beyond the effects of this event alone, because the same region was impacted by an Mw7.1 Darfield six months earlier. Accordingly, there is much that can be learned from comparing the different levels of soil liquefaction, differing magnitudes and seismic source distances, and variable performance of buildings, lifelines, and engineered systems during these two earthquakes, along with the many strong aftershocks. It is rare to have the opportunity to document the effects of one significant earthquake on a modern city with good building codes. It is extremely rare to have the opportunity to learn how the same ground and infrastructure responded to two significant earthquakes. This report presents an overview of observed geotechnical aspects of the Christchurch earthquake; a previous GEER report covers observations from the Darfield earthquake: (http://www.geerassociation.org/GEER_Post%20EQ%20Reports/Darfield%20New%20Zealand_ 2010/Cover_Darfield_2010.html). A unique aspect of the Christchurch earthquake is the severity and spatial extent of liquefaction occurring in native soils. Overall, both the spatial extent and severity of liquefaction in the city was greater than in the preceding Darfield earthquake, including numerous areas that liquefied in both events. Liquefaction and lateral spreading, variable over both large and short spatial scales, affected commercial structures in the Central Business District (CBD) in a variety of ways including: total and differential settlements and tilting; punching settlements of structures with shallow foundations; differential movements of components of complex structures; and interaction of adjacent structures via common foundation soils. Liquefaction was most severe in residential areas located to the east of the CBD as a result of stronger ground shaking due to the proximity to the causative fault, a high water table, and soils with composition and states of high susceptibility and potential for liquefaction. The effects of liquefaction and lateral spreading are estimated to have severely compromised 15,000 residential structures, the majority of which otherwise sustained only minor to moderate damage directly due to inertial loading from ground shaking. Liquefaction also had a profound effect on lifelines and other infrastructure, particularly bridge structures, and underground services. Minor damage was also observed at flood stopbanks to the north of the city, which were more severely impacted in the Darfield earthquake. Due to the large high-frequency ground motion in the Port Hills numerous rockfalls and landslides also occurred, resulting in several fatalities and rendering some residential areas uninhabitable. Following the earthquake, a geotechnical reconnaissance was conducted by a joint NZ-US team. The NZ and US members worked as one team and shared resources, information, and logistics in order to conduct a thorough and efficient reconnaissance covering a large area over a very limited time period. The observations presented in this report resulted from reconnaissance 1-1 efforts that started immediately following the earthquake by the NZ team members and by US team members over a period of six days (2–8 March 2011). However, because access to the CBD was limited during the time of the US main contingent’s visit, two US members performed a reconnaissance visit at a later date, with the main focus of the visit being the performance of lifelines and building foundation systems in the CBD. The team included the following members: Assoc. Prof. Misko Cubrinovski – NZ Lead (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Assoc. Prof. Russell A. Green – US Lead (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA) Mr. John Allen – (TRI/Environmental, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) Dr. Brendon Bradley – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Assist. Prof. Aaron Bradshaw – (University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA) Prof. Jonathan Bray – (UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA) Mr. Greg DePascale – (Fugro/WLA, Christchurch, New Zealand) Mr. Duncan Henderson – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Mr. Lucas Hogan – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) Mr. Patrick Kailey – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Dr. Rolando Orense – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) Prof. Thomas O’Rourke – (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA) Prof. Michael Pender – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) Prof. Glenn Rix – (Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, USA) Ms. Kelly Robinson – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Mr. Merrick Taylor – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Mr. Donald Wells – (AMEC Geomatrix, Oakland, CA, USA) Ms. Anna Winkley – (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand) Mr. Clint Wood – (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA) Dr. Liam Wotherspoon – (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Support for the GEER participants in this work was provided from grants from the U.S. National Science Foundations (NSF) as part of the Geo-engineering Extreme Event Reconnaissance (GEER) Association activity through an NSF RAPID GRANT and CMMI-00323914. The GEER Team reconnaissance was performed in coordination with teams from EERI. (Note that Thomas O’Rourke was a member of both the GEER and EERI Teams, with his travel support coming from both organizations). Primary support for the New Zealand participants was provided by the University of Canterbury, the University of Auckland, and the New Zealand Earthquake Commission (EQC). However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the associated organizations and funding agencies. We particularly appreciate Mike Jacka from Tonkin and Taylor, Christchurch, who provided valuable information related to liquefaction-induced damage to residential properties and CPT data. Josh Zupan, University of California, Berkeley, CA, Sam Lasley, Virginia Tech, 1-2 Blacksburg, VA, and Brady Cox, Fayetteville, AR, assisted the reconnaissance, data management and preparation of this report. Josh Zupan (University of California, Berkeley) and Dr. Bruce Deam (University of Canterbury) assisted with posting of the report. 1-3 2. SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS Regional seismicity and historical earthquakes New Zealand straddles the boundary of the Australian and Pacific plates, where relative plate motion is obliquely convergent across the plate boundary at about 50 mm/yr in the north of the country, 40 mm/yr in the center, and 30 mm/yr in the south (DeMets et al. 1994). The complex faulting associated with the changing orientation of the subduction zones in the northeast and southwest, causes predominantly dextral faulting through the axial tectonic belt in the center of the country. As a result of this complex faulting, New Zealand is a region of distributed seismicity, in that the relative movement of the Australian and Pacific plates are not accommodated by one or two faults in a narrow zone, but by many faults across
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 22 June New Zealand Gazette 2173
    22 JUNE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 2173 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Name Address Date of Registration Alexander, Richard David Elwell P.O. Box 176, Hokitika 23/10/63 Anderson, William Wayne P.O. Box 4000, Christchurch 1/12/74 Annett, Paul James P.O. Box 13443, Christchurch 216180 Ashby, Martin John Stony Flat Road R.D. 2 Loburn, Rangiora 7/4/85 Aubrey, Ronald Alfred P.O. Box 966, Christchurch 31/10/61 Baker, Robert Keith P.O. Box 43, Christchurch 18/5/49 Bamford, Simon John Knowles Landcorp Private eag, Christchurch 8/3/89 Barraclough, Christopher Charles P.O. Box 13633, Christchurch 26/10/78 Barwell, Alfred George 23 Corfe Street Upper Riccarton, Christchurch 4 21/11/68 Beatson, Mark Andrew P.O. Box 2532, Christchurch 5/4/86 Beauchamp, John Murray 213A Mt Pleasant Road, Christchurch 8 18/2/77 Bennett, Gerald Malcolm P.O. Box 34 Diamond Harbour, Canterbury 6/10/64 Bennett, William Daniel P.O. Box 356, Christchurch 19/2/74 Bilbrough, Allan Ingram P.O. Box 356, Christchurch 28/3/61 Bilbrough, Nicola Robyn P.O. Box 356, Christchurch 28/2/88 Black, Herbert David P.O. Box 13443, Christchurch 26/5/78 Blackburn, Peter Grosvenor P.O. Box 13443, Christchurch 2319177 Blackman, Brian Joseph 8 Eva Street, Greymouth 8/12/76 Blake, William P.O. Box 13341, Christchurch 2017179 Bradley, Michael Guthrie Misty Hills R.D. Duvachelle, Banks Peninsula 5/10/65 Bridgeman, Christopher Orlando Eskhead Station R.D. Harwarden, North Canterbury 15/6/67 Bridges, Christopher James 1 Te Awakura Terrace, Christchurch 8 13/9/84 Bright, Grant Noel Park Road R.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake of 22 February 2011
    THE MW 6.3 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT THE CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT Sean Wilkinson Matthew Free Damian Grant David Boon Sarah Paganoni Anna Mason Elizabeth Williams Stuart Fraser Jenny Haskell Earthquake Field Investigation Team Institution of Structural Engineers 47 - 58 Bastwick Street London EC1V 3PS Tel 0207235 4535 Fax 0207235 4294 Email: [email protected] June 2011 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. REGIONAL TECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING 6 3. SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS 12 4. NEW ZEALAND BUILDING STOCK AND DESIGN PRACTICE 25 5. PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS 32 6. PERFORMANCE OF LIFELINES 53 7. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS 62 8. DISASTER MANAGEMENT 96 9. ECONOMIC LOSSES AND INSURANCE 108 10. CONCLUSIONS 110 11. REFERENCES 112 APPENDIX A: DETAILED RESIDENTIAL DAMAGE SURVEY 117 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their thanks to the many individuals and organisations that have assisted with the EEFIT mission to Christchurch and in the preparation of this report. We thank Arup for enabling Matthew Free to attend this mission and the British Geological Survey for allowing David Boon to attend. We would also like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for providing funding for Sean Wilkinson, Damian Grant, Elizabeth Paganoni and Sarah Paganoni to join the team. Their continued support in enabling UK academics to witness the aftermath of earthquakes and the effects on structures and the communities they serve is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaiapoi Street Map
    Kaiapoi Street Map www.northcanterbury.co.nz www.visitwaimakariri.co.nz 5 19 To Woodend, Kaikoura and Picton North To Rangiora T S S M A I L L I W 2 D R E 62 D I S M A C 29 54 E V A 64 E To Pines, O H and Kairaki 52 U T 39 45 4 57 44 10 7 63 46 47 30 8 32 59 9 38 33 24 65 11 37 66 48 18 16 23 61 26 20 17 27 25 49 13 58 14 12 28 21 51 15 22 31 41 56 50 55 3 1 35 Sponsored by 36 JIM BRYDEN RESERVE LICENSED AGENT REAA 2008 To Christchurch Harcourts Twiss-Keir Realty Ltd. 6 MREINZ Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Phone: 03 327 5379 Email: [email protected] Web: www.twisskeir.co.nz 40 60 © Copyright Enterprise North Canterbury 2016 For information and bookings contact Kaiapoi i-SITE Visitor Centre Kaiapoi Street and Information Index Phone 03 327 3134 Adams Street C5 Cressy Ave F3 Lees Rd A5 Sneyd St F2 Accommodation Attractions Adderley Tce E2 Cridland St E4 Lower Camside Rd B4 Sovereign Bvd C5 1 H3 Blue Skies Holiday & Conference Park 32 F4 Kaiapoi Historic Railway Station Akaroa St G3 Cumberland Pl H2 Magnate Dr C5 Stark Pl D5 2 C4 Grenmora B & B 55 Old North Rd 33 F4 Kaiapoi Museum And Art Gallery Aldersgate St G2 Dale St D4 Magnolia Bvd D5 Sterling Cres C5 3 H3 Kaiapoi on Williams Motel 35 H3 National Scout Museum Alexander Ln F3 Davie St F4 Main Drain Rd D1 Stone St H4 64 F6 Kairaki Beach Cottage 36 H5 Woodford Glen Speedway Allison Cres D5 Dawson Douglas Pl G4 Main North Rd I3 Storer St F1 4 F3 Morichele B & B Alpine Ln F3 Day Pl F5 Mansfield Dr G3 Sutherland Dr C6 5 A5 Pine Acres Holiday Park & Motels Recreation Ansel Pl D5 Doubledays
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Extraction of Ground Motion Parameters for Scientific Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel
    Guideline for Extraction of Ground Motion Parameters for Scientific Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel Alireza Babaie Mahani Ph.D. P.Geo. Mahan Geophysical Consulting Inc. Victoria, BC Email: [email protected] Website: www.mahangeo.com Executive Summary The Scientific Review of Hydraulic Fracturing in British Columbia (2019) provides the key findings of a scientific panel on the topic of hydraulic fracturing in British Columbia and the associated environmental risks. As indicated in the report, the panel recommends preparation of guidelines for standard calculation of earthquake magnitude and ground motion parameters. Since Babaie Mahani and Kao (2019 and 2020) have addressed the methodology for calculation of local magnitude in two publications, this report deals with standard methodologies for extraction of ground motion parameters from recorded earthquake waveforms. The guidelines include data from both types of seismic sensors that are used for induced seismicity monitoring; seismometers that record ground motion velocities and accelerometers that are designed to record strong ground accelerations at short distances. Waveforms from the November 30, 2018 induced earthquake with moment magnitude (Mw) of 4.6 that occurred in northeast British Columbia within the Montney unconventional resource play are presented for better understanding of the processing steps. Data Formats The standard format that is used to archive earthquake data is called the SEED format (Standard for the Exchange of Earthquake Data; https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/data/formats/seed/). When both the time series data and metadata are archived in one file, the name full-SEED is also used. miniSEED is the stripped down version of SEED that only includes waveform data (https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/data/formats/miniseed/).
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism
    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Street Names: B
    Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information Badger Street Named after Ronald Parklands Badger was a real estate Sylvia Street Information supplied "The property Smith Badger agent and a landowner in by Richard Greenaway market", The Press, (1880?-1946). New Brighton. in 2008. 19 October 1918, p 10 First appears in street directories in 1928. “Obituary, Mr R. S. Badger”, The Press, 18 September 1946, p 5 Baffin Street Named after Baffin Wainoni One of a number of streets Huron Street, “Chester Street West or “Tunnel’s first blast Island in the Arctic in a subdivision between Niagara Street, Cranmer Terrace?”, celebrated”, The Ocean of Northern Ottawa Road, Pages Road Ontario Place, The Press, 28 April Press, 22 July 2011, Canada. and Cuffs Road given Quebec Place, 1959, p 7 p A7 Canadian place names. Vancouver Information supplied in Crescent and Named because Canadian 2005 by Tim Baker in Winnipeg Place. engineers and workers an interview with Also Ottawa lived in the area while Margaret Harper. Road. working for Henry J. Kaiser Co of USA and building the Lyttelton road tunnel. Houses were built for them by Fletcher Construction. After the tunnel was opened in 1964, the Canadians went home and their houses were sold to locals. © Christchurch City Libraries February 2016 Page 1 of 172 Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information OR Named because they were near Ottawa Road. Named in 1959. Baigent Way Named after Steve Middleton Baigent was a former Riccarton/Wigram Baigent.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Badminton Competition
    A HISTORY OF THE BADMINTON COMPETITION A Grade Boys Girls 1990 Aranui High School Burnside High School 1991 Rangiora High School Rangiora High School 1992 Burnside High School Riccarton High School For the WestpacTrust Trophy 1993 Burnside High School Avonside Girls High School 1994 Burnside High School Burnside High School 1995 Burnside High School Burnside High School 1996 Burnside High School Burnside High School 1997 Burnside High School Burnside High School 1998 Burnside High School Burnside High School 1999 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2000 Burnside High School Avonside Girls & Burnside High Schools Amalgamated with B Grade as a Senior Grade 2001 Burnside High School Riccarton High School 2002 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2003 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2004 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2005 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2006 Burnside High School Riccarton High School 2007 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2008 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2009 2010 St Andrews College Burnside High School 2011 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2012 St Andrews College Burnside High School 2013 St Andrews College St Margaret’s College 2014 Burnside High School St Margaret’s College 2015 Christchurch Boys High School St Margaret’s College 2016 Cashmere High School Lincoln High School 2017 Burnside High School Cashmere High School 2018 Burnside High School Burnside High School 2019 Burnside High School St Andrew’s College 2020 Burnside High School St Andrew’s
    [Show full text]
  • Using Campaign GPS Data to Model Slip Rates on the Alpine Fault
    New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics ISSN: 0028-8306 (Print) 1175-8791 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzg20 A geodetic study of the Alpine Fault through South Westland: using campaign GPS data to model slip rates on the Alpine Fault Chris J. Page, Paul H. Denys & Chris F. Pearson To cite this article: Chris J. Page, Paul H. Denys & Chris F. Pearson (2018): A geodetic study of the Alpine Fault through South Westland: using campaign GPS data to model slip rates on the Alpine Fault, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2018.1494006 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2018.1494006 View supplementary material Published online: 09 Aug 2018. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzg20 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2018.1494006 RESEARCH ARTICLE A geodetic study of the Alpine Fault through South Westland: using campaign GPS data to model slip rates on the Alpine Fault Chris J. Page, Paul H. Denys and Chris F. Pearson School of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Although the Alpine Fault has been studied extensively, there have been few geodetic studies Received 11 December 2017 in South Westland. We include a series of new geodetic measurements from sites across the Accepted 25 June 2018 Haast Pass and preliminary results from a recently established network, the Cascade array KEYWORDS that extends from the Arawhata River to Lake McKerrow, a region that previously had few Alpine Fault; slip rates; South geodetic measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral Working Group Recommendation Report
    CATHEDRAL WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 Released by the Minister supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration This document and its contents are confidential and shall not be distributed, published, copied or reproduced without the express written permission of the Minister Supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration and the Church Property Trustees. VERSION ISSUE DATE REASON FOR ISSUE AUTHOR APPROVED FOR ISSUE 1 28.10.16 Draft for Review Bianca Hurrell, RCP Marcus Read, RCP 2 31.10.16 Draft to include Bianca Hurrell, RCP Marcus Read, RCP comments from Working Group Chair Regeneration 3 01.11.16 Edited and Proofed Anna Komink, Axiom Marcus Read, RCP Final Draft to CWG / Bianca Hurrell, RCP 4 07.11.16 Updates following Bianca Hurrell, RCP / Marcus Read, RCP / CWG meeting Anna Komink, Axiom Geoff Dangerfield, CWG Christchurch 5 21.11.16 Updates as Geoff Dangerfield, Geoff Dangerfield, provided to CWG CWG / Marcus Read, CWG / Marcus Read, for review RCP RCP 6 24.11.16 Final Draft providedGreater Geoff Dangerfield, Marcus Read, RCP / to CWG for review CWG / Marcus Read, Geoff Dangerfield, RCP CWG 7 25.11.16 Final Copy Geoff Dangerfield, Geoff Dangerfield, CWG / Marcus Read, CWG / Marcus Read, RCP RCP supporting Minister the by Released ii CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Recommendations 7 3.0 Introduction 9 4.0 Background and Context 12 5.0 Values and Requirements of the ChristChurch Cathedral 13 6.0 Heritage and Archaeological Review Regeneration16 7.0 Structural Review 21 8.0 Regeneration of the Square 27 9.0 Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Setting Seismic Hazard Epicentral Region
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR EARTHQUAKE SUMMARY MAP U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the M8.0 Samoa Islands Region Earthquake of 29 September 2009 Global Seismographic Network M a r s Epicentral Region h a M A R S H A L L l I S TL A eN DcS tonic Setting l 174° 176° 178° 180° 178° 176° 174° 172° 170° 168° 166° C e n t r a l 160° 170° I 180° 170° 160° 150° s l a P a c i f i c K M e l a n e s i a n n L NORTH a d B a s i n i p B a s i n s n Chris tmas Island i H e BISMARCK n C g I R N s PLATE a l B R I TA i G E I s E W N T R 0° m a 0° N E R N e i n P A C I F I C 10° 10° C a H l T d b r s a e r C P L A T E n t E g I D n e i s A o Z l M e a t u r SOUTH n R r a c d E K I R I B A T I s F s K g o BISMARCK l a p a PLATE P A C I F I C G a Solomon Islands P L A T E S O L O M O N T U V A L U V I T Y I S L A N D S A Z TR FUTUNA PLATE 12° 12° S EN O U C BALMORAL C 10° T H H o 10° S O REEF o WOODLARK L Santa k O M Cruz PLATE I PLATE O N T RE N C H Sam sl Is lands oa I NIUAFO'OU a N s n C o r a l S e a S A M O A lan d SOLOMON SEA O ds PLATE s T U B a s i n R A M E R I C A N (N A PLATE T M H .
    [Show full text]
  • Mylonitization Temperatures and Geothermal Gradient from Ti-In
    Solid Earth Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2018-12 Manuscript under review for journal Solid Earth Discussion started: 7 March 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. Constraints on Alpine Fault (New Zealand) Mylonitization Temperatures and Geothermal Gradient from Ti-in-quartz Thermobarometry Steven Kidder1, Virginia Toy2, Dave Prior2, Tim Little3, Colin MacRae 4 5 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, City College New York, New York, 10031, USA 2Department of Geology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 3School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand 4CSIRO Mineral Resources, Microbeam Laboratory, Private Bag 10, 3169 Clayton South, Victoria, Australia Correspondence to: Steven B. Kidder ([email protected]) 10 Abstract. We constrain the thermal state of the central Alpine Fault using approximately 750 Ti-in-quartz SIMS analyses from a suite of variably deformed mylonites. Ti-in-quartz concentrations span more than an order of magnitude from 0.24 to ~5 ppm, suggesting recrystallization of quartz over a 300° range in temperature. Most Ti-in-quartz concentrations in mylonites, protomylonites, and the Alpine Schist protolith are between 2 and 4 ppm and do not vary as a function of grain size or bulk rock composition. Analyses of 30 large, inferred-remnant quartz grains (>250 µm), as well as late, cross-cutting, chlorite-bearing 15 quartz veins also reveal restricted Ti concentrations of 2-4 ppm. These results indicate that the vast majority of Alpine Fault mylonitization occurred within a restricted zone of pressure-temperature conditions where 2-4 ppm Ti-in-quartz concentrations are stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Structure of the Southern Alps Orogen, South Island, New Zealand
    Regional Geophysics chapter 15/04/2007 1 GEOPHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF THE SOUTHERN ALPS OROGEN, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND. F J Davey1, D Eberhart-Phillips2, M D Kohler3, S Bannister1, G Caldwell1, S Henrys1, M Scherwath4, T Stern5, and H van Avendonk6 1GNS Science, Gracefield, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, [email protected] 2GNS Science, Dunedin, New Zealand 3Center for Embedded Networked Sensing, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA 4Leibniz-Institute of Marine Sciences, IFM-GEOMAR, Kiel, Germany 5School of Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand 6Institute of Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA ABSTRACT The central part of the South Island of New Zealand is a product of the transpressive continental collision of the Pacific and Australian plates during the past 5 million years, prior to which the plate boundary was largely transcurrent for over 10 My. Subduction occurs at the north (west dipping) and south (east dipping) of South Island. The deformation is largely accommodated by the ramping up of the Pacific plate over the Australian plate and near-symmetric mantle shortening. The initial asymmetric crustal deformation may be the result of an initial difference in lithospheric strength or an inherited suture resulting from earlier plate motions. Delamination of the Pacific plate occurs resulting in the uplift and exposure of mid- crustal rocks at the plate boundary fault (Alpine fault) to form a foreland mountain chain. In addition, an asymmetric crustal root (additional 8 - 17 km) is formed, with an underlying mantle downwarp. The crustal root, which thickens southwards, comprises the delaminated lower crust and a thickened overlying middle crust.
    [Show full text]