DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Greenfield Wisconsin Comprehensive Plan Adopted: 12.15.2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Greenfield Wisconsin Comprehensive Plan Adopted: 12.15.2020 CITY OF GREENFIELD WISCONSIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED: 12.15.2020 City of Greenfield Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Common Council Plan Commission Michael Neitzke, Mayor Michael Neitzke, Chair Denise Collins, District One Donald Carlson, Member Bruce Bailey, District Two David Schilz, Member, Park & Recreation Board Karl Kastner, District Three Representative Pamela Akers, District Four Christine Hallen, Member Shirley Saryan, District Five Ald. Karl Kastner Robert Krenz, Alternate Steve Rogers, Member Brian Weis, Member Vandewalle & Associates City Staff Scott Harrington, AICP, Principal Planner Kristi Porter, Community Development Manager Jackie Mich, AICP, Project Manager Andrew Stern, Planner Dan Johns, AICP, Associate Planner Ben Rohr, AICP, Assistant Planner Elona Bartnick, Associate Designer Dan Eckberg, AICP, GIS Planner Nicole Anderson, Project Assistant Vandewalle & Associates 247 West Freshwater Way, Suite 530 Milwaukee, WI 53204 (608) 988-8631 www.vandewalle.com Adopted: December 15, 2020 i City of Greenfield Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements Page intentionally left blank Adopted: December 15, 2020 ii City of Greenfield Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of this Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Planning Process ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 General Regional Context ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Summary of Public Input .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Goals, Objectives, Policies, Programs, and Recommendations .................................................................................. 2 Organization of this Plan ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter One: Issues and Opportunities ................................................................................... 5 A. Opportunity and Targeted Sites Analysis ................................................................................................................ 5 Map 1: Jurisdictional Boundaries ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Map 2: Metro Connections ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Map 3: Priority Special Interest Areas ........................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter Two: Agricultural, Natural, and Cultural Resources ............................................... 19 A. Natural Resource Goals, Objectives, and Policies ............................................................................................... 19 B. Natural Resource Programs and Recommendations: Putting the “Green” Back in Greenfield .................. 20 Figure 1: Example of Vegetative Buffer ......................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 2: Urban Heat Island ......................................................................................................................................... 23 Map 4: Natural Features ............................................................................................................................................. 25 C. Cultural Resource Goals, Objective, and Policies ................................................................................................ 27 D. Cultural Resource Programs and Recommendations .......................................................................................... 27 Chapter Three: Land Use ......................................................................................................... 29 A. Existing Land Use Inventory & Pattern ................................................................................................................ 29 B. Existing Land Use Map Categories ........................................................................................................................ 29 C. Existing Land Use Pattern ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Table 1: Existing Land Use Totals for the City of Greenfield ........................................................................................ 30 Map 5: Existing Land Use .......................................................................................................................................... 33 D. Future Land Use ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 E. Land Use Goals, Objectives, and Policies ............................................................................................................. 35 F. Land Use Programs and Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 36 Map 6: Future Land Use .............................................................................................................................................. 39 G. Special Interest Areas (Smart Growth Areas) ....................................................................................................... 42 H. Other Land Use Programs and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 53 Chapter Four: Transportation .................................................................................................. 55 A. Transportation Goals, Objectives, and Policies ................................................................................................... 55 B. Transportation Programs and Recommendations ............................................................................................... 56 Map 7: Existing Transportation Network ................................................................................................................... 59 Chapter Five: Utilities and Community Facilities ................................................................... 61 A. Utilities and Community Facilities Goals, Objectives, and Policies ................................................................. 61 C. Utilities and Community Facilities Programs and Recommendations ............................................................. 63 Table 2: Utilities and Community Facilities Timetable .................................................................................................. 64 Map 8: Community Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 65 Adopted: December 15, 2020 iii City of Greenfield Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Chapter Six: Housing and Neighborhood Development ..................................................... 67 A. Housing and Neighborhood Development Goals, Objectives, and Policies .................................................. 67 B. Housing and Neighborhood Development Programs and Recommendations .............................................. 68 Figure 3: Preferred Multi-Family Residential Development Layout ................................................................................ 69 Chapter Seven: Economic Development ............................................................................. 73 A. Assessment of Desired Economic Development Focus .................................................................................... 73 Table 3: Strengths and Weaknesses for Economic Development ...................................................................................... 73 B. Economic Development Goals, Objectives, and Policies .................................................................................. 75 C. Economic Development Programs and Recommendations .............................................................................. 76 Figure 4: Preferred Layout for Indoor Retail, Service, and Community Facility Development (Small to Moderate Scale) . 78 Figure 5: Preferred Layout for Indoor Retail, Service, and Community Facility Development (Large Scale) ..................... 78 Figure 6: In-Vehicle Sale and Service (e.g,. Gas Stations, Fast Food Restaurants) ......................................................... 79 Figure 7: Neighborhood Business, Community Facilities, Mixed-Use ............................................................................. 79 Chapter Eight: Intergovernmental Cooperation .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Century of Scholarship 1881 – 2004
    A Century of Scholarship 1881 – 2004 Distinguished Scholars Reception Program (Date – TBD) Preface A HUNDRED YEARS OF SCHOLARSHIP AND RESEARCH AT MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY DISTINGUISHED SCHOLARS’ RECEPTION (DATE – TBD) At today’s reception we celebrate the outstanding accomplishments, excluding scholarship and creativity of Marquette remarkable records in many non-scholarly faculty, staff and alumni throughout the pursuits. It is noted that the careers of last century, and we eagerly anticipate the some alumni have been recognized more coming century. From what you read in fully over the years through various this booklet, who can imagine the scope Alumni Association awards. and importance of the work Marquette people will do during the coming hundred Given limitations, it is likely that some years? deserving individuals have been omitted and others have incomplete or incorrect In addition, this gathering honors the citations in the program listing. Apologies recipient of the Lawrence G. Haggerty are extended to anyone whose work has Faculty Award for Research Excellence, not been properly recognized; just as as well as recognizing the prestigious prize scholarship is a work always in progress, and the man for whom it is named. so is the compilation of a list like the one Presented for the first time in the year that follows. To improve the 2000, the award has come to be regarded completeness and correctness of the as a distinguishing mark of faculty listing, you are invited to submit to the excellence in research and scholarship. Graduate School the names of individuals and titles of works and honors that have This program lists much of the published been omitted or wrongly cited so that scholarship, grant awards, and major additions and changes can be made to the honors and distinctions among database.
    [Show full text]
  • Studio Art | 120 Credits
    EXAMPLE FOUR-YEAR PLAN STUDIO ART | 120 CREDITS MAJOR CORE ELECTIVES FRESHMAN YEAR FALL Courses SPRING Courses SYM 110 Leadership for Social Justice 3 Science 3 ENG 110 Introduction to College Writing 3 ENG 120 College Research Writing 3 College Level Math 3 SEA 101 Search for Meaning 4 Drawing 3 3-Dimensional Design 3 2-Dimensional Design & Color Theory 3 Adobe Technology Principles 3 TOTAL 15 credits TOTAL 16 credits SOPHOMORE YEAR FALL Courses SPRING Courses World Languages 3 History 3 Theology 4 Literature 3 Oral Communications 2 Painting 3 Ceramics 3 Art History 3 Art History 3 Studio Option 3 Professional Practices 1 TOTAL 15 credits TOTAL 16 credits JUNIOR YEAR FALL Courses SPRING Courses Behavioral Science 3 Humanistics Option 3 Philosophy 4 3D Studio Option – Sculpture 3 Art History 3 2D Studio Option – Photography 3 2D Studio Option – Figure Drawing 3 Elective Course 3 Studio Option 3 Elective Course 3 TOTAL 16 credits TOTAL 15 credits SENIOR YEAR FALL Courses SPRING Courses 3D Option – Art Metal 3 Studio Option 3 2D Option – Printmaking 3 Career Seminar 3 Studio Option 3 Elective Course 3 Elective Course 3 Elective Course 3 Elective Course 3 TOTAL 15 credits TOTAL 12 credits UPDATED MAY 2020 This example four-year plan is intended to outline the number and types of courses a student might take in order to fulfill the degree, major, core and elective requirements to graduate. Students meet with their academic advisor each semester to review progress toward fulfilling their degree requirements. Sponsored by the School Sisters of Notre Dame Mount Mary University | 2900 North Menomonee River Parkway | Milwaukee, WI 53222 | (414) 930-3024 | mtmary.edu MOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY STUDIO ART SCHOOL OF ARTS & DESIGN Mount Mary studio art students engage in a curriculum that develops CAREER OPPORTUNITIES their abilities in multiple methods and media while supporting individual A degree in studio art leads to interests in content and visual language.
    [Show full text]
  • BILANCIO DI SOSTENIBILITÀ 2019 2019 DI SOSTENIBILITÀ BILANCIO Dichiarazione Nonfinanziaria Aisensideld.Lgs.254/2016
    BILANCIO DI SOSTENIBILITÀ 2019 BILANCIO DI SOSTENIBILITÀ 2019Dichiarazione Non Finanziaria ai sensi del D.Lgs. 254/2016 BILANCIO DI SOSTENIBILITÀ 2019 Dichiarazione Non Finanziaria ai sensi del D.Lgs 254/2016 GRUPPO FINCANTIERI GRUPPO FINCANTIERI I NDICE LETTERA AGLI STAKEHOLDER 4 La qualità al centro 112 Un dialogo costante 118 FINCANTIERI IN NUMERI 8 Per le nostre persone 120 Puntiamo ad attrarre i talenti 121 UN GRUPPO SOSTENIBILE 11 Formiamo e valorizziamo le nostre 124 La nostra identità 12 persone per l'eccellenza La nostra strategia di sostenibilità 19 Diversità e inclusione come ricchezza 128 Il nostro impegno per la salute e la sicurezza 131 UNA GOVERNANCE RESPONSABILE 37 Benessere per le nostre persone 137 Corporate Governace e Politica 38 Ascoltiamo le nostre persone 142 di Remunerazione Per la comunità 144 Il nostro sistema di controllo interno 44 Le nostre linee d'azione 146 e la gestione dei rischi Dialoghiamo con le comunità e le istituzioni 153 Le nostre regole per un agire corretto 46 Rispettiamo i diritti umani 51 FINCANTIERI PER L'AMBIENTE 154 Proteggiamo i dati e le informazioni 55 Per ridurre i nostri impatti 156 Il nostro sistema di gestione 158 FINCANTIERI PER LA SOCIETÀ 59 Investiamo per l'ambiente 170 Per l'economia e il mercato 60 Tuteliamo la biodiversità 171 Valore economico per gli stakeholder 62 Per promuovere la sotenibilità 172 Il nostro indotto economico 68 Le nostre navi sempre più green 172 Per l'innovazione 70 Sensibilizziamo i nostri partner 182 Siamo innovatori 70 all'ecosostenibilità Collaboriamo
    [Show full text]
  • Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary
    Watershed Restoration Plan Menomonee River Chapter 1: Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction The primary purpose of this Watershed Restoration Plan (WRP) is to identify specific actions that can be implemented between 2010 and 2015 to improve water quality within the Menomonee River and its tributaries and present general recommendations for activity beyond 2015. These actions have been identified based upon a consideration of many factors, including overall effectiveness, scientific underpinning, regulatory considerations, and stakeholder goals. This WRP describes the characteristics of the Menomonee River and its watershed, focusing on those topics that are directly related to implementation (Figure 1-1). Information provided includes existing (Baseline Year 2000) and Year 2020 land uses, Baseline Year 2000 and Year 2020 water quality conditions, and the most significant sources of pollution. Water quality goals selected by the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (SWWT), based upon scientific, regulatory, and stakeholder considerations, are also presented and explained, as are the load reductions that will be needed to meet those goals. The reductions are based upon projected loads for the Year 2020 and as such account for future growth. This WRP is the culmination of historical and recent activity to protect and restore water quality within the greater Milwaukee region. Most significantly, it builds upon the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU) and Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) 2020 Facilities Plan and incorporates the input from members of the SWWT and its associated Menomonee River Watershed Action Team (WAT) and Science Committee. 1.2 Key Elements of the Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan This WRP follows the Clean Water Act guidelines for developing effective watershed plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Germantown 4/18/20
    April 18, 2020 //Volume 29, Issue 16 MENOMONEE FALLS SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL (262) 251-7774 • N91 W17194 Appleton Ave. RESTAURANTS Mon. & Fri. 10-6; Tues, Wed, Thurs. 10-7; Sat. 10-3 $ WATCH (262) 238-6397 PAGE 5 5.00 BATTERY discoverhometown.com YOUR FIRST SOURCE FOR LOCAL NEWS, SPORTS & ADVERTISING INSTALLED WITH THIS AD Falls incumbents re-elected N64 W24576 Main St. to Village Board Sussex • 262-246-6808 Incumbents on the Menomonee up for election on the Menomonee Falls Village Board were re-elected Falls Village Board. Melinda McShane TAKEOUT during the April 7 election while the was elected with 4,663 votes while AVAILABLE challenger upset the incumbent for Eric Pelzer also joined the board with village president in Sussex. 4,105 votes. Incumbent Mark Nadolski 11AM-1PM The results were announced on received 3,859 votes while Robert & 5PM-8PM April 13. In the village of Sussex, chal- DeKoning received 3,841 votes. lenger Anthony LeDonne was elected While Jill Karofsky was elected the DAILY with 1,712 votes while incumbent state Supreme Court, the majority of W156 N9664 Gregory Goetz received 1,615 votes. Waukesha County residents supported Pilgrim Rd. There were two seats up for election her opponent. Justice Daniel Kelly was Germantown on the Sussex Village Board, with Ron supported by 86,776 voters while 251-1555 Wells being elected with 1,813 votes Karofsky was supported by 54,357 DELIVERY • CARRYOUT while Scott Adkins was elected to a county residents. term on the board with 1,612 votes. A statewide referendum calling for Now Available! Charles Votjas received 1,158 votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Company Telephone Number
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS COMPREHENSIVE SUSTAINABLE MASTER PLAN TOWN OF GREENFIELD MASSACHUSETTS William F. Martin, Mayor Eric Twarog, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Date of Issuance: Wednesday, June 4, 2012 Submission Deadline: Thursday, July 26, 2012 @ 2:00 PM Department of Planning & Development, Town of Greenfield, 14 Court Square, Greenfield, MA 01301 Telephone: 413-772-1549 Fax: 413-772-1309 TABLE OF CONTENTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ADVERTISEMENT ----------------------------------------------------------- 3 INTRODUCTION------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 GENERAL INFORMATION AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ------------------- 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ------------------------------------------------------------- 7 SCOPE OF WORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 EXISTING PLANNING RESOURCES AND ONGOING PLANNING ACTIVITIES ------------------ 15 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 16 PRICE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 EVALUATION CRITERIA------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 PRE-AWARD
    [Show full text]
  • A Park and Open Space Plan for Milwaukee County
    A PARK AND OPEN SPACE PLAN FOR MILWAUKEE COUNTY SUMMARY REPORT MAY 1991 MILWAUKEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURE Summary Report A PARK AND OPEN SPACE PLAN FOR MILWAUKEE COUNTY PROPOSED NEW PLAN COMPLETED kee County. The report provides information on recent park and open space acquisition and devel- In 1977, the Regional Planning Commission pre- opment within the County; incorporates new land pared a regional park and open space plan for use and natural resource inventory and planning Southeastern Wisconsin. That plan was adopted by data; and, as necessary, sets forth revised recom- the Milwaukee County Board in 1978 as a guide mendations on park and open space site acquisition to the acquisition and development of needed park and development within Milwaukee County. The and open space sites and facilities in the County. report also contains a set of park and open space At the request of Milwaukee County, the South- preservation, acquisition, and development objec- eastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission tives and supporting standards relevant to the has prepared a new County park plan. needs and values of the citizens of the County, and identifies the roles which the State and local Adoption and implementation of the plan will, over agencies of government, as well as the County, time, result in the completion of an integrated park should play in meeting park and related open space and related open space system within the County- needs within the County in a fully coordinated, a system which can continue to preserve and cooperative manner. Adoption of the plan by the enhance the natural resource base, while at the County Board and by the Wisconsin Department of same time providing, in an efficient and effective Natural Resources will make the County eligible for manner, opportunities for a wide range of high- up to 50 percent assistance in the acquisition and quality outdoor recreational experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Agazine of History
    Wisconsin agazine of History Tke Wisco-nsin l^ational Guard on the Mexican Border JOHN p. FINNEGAN Robert M. La Follette, Public Prosecutor DAVID p. THELEN Gothic Stylism in Wisconsin Architecture RICHARD W. E. PERRIN Marshall Academy: A History BEULAH FOLKEDAHL English Immigrants in Wisconsin Published by The State Historical Society of Wisconsin / Vol. XLVII, No. 3 / Spring, 1964 THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN LESLIE H. FISHEL, JR., Director Officers JOHN C. GEILFUSS, President HERBERT V. KOHLER, Honorary Vice-President E. E. HOMSTAD, Vice-President, Treasurer LESLIE H. FISHEL, JR., Secretary Board of Curators Ex-Officio JOHN W. REYNOLDS, Governor of the State MRS. DENA A. SMITH, State Treasurer ROBERT C. ZIMMERMAN, Secretary of State FRED H. HARRINGTON, President of the University ANGUS B. ROTHWELL, Superintendent of Public Instruction MRS. JOSEPH C. GAMROTH, President of the Women's Auxiliary Term Expires, 1964 THOMAS H. BARLAND E. E. HOMSTAD MRS. RAYMOND J. KOLTES FREDERIC SAMMOND Eau Claire Black River Falls Madison Milwaukee M. J. DYRUD GEORGE F. KASTEN CHARLES MANSON FLOYD SPRINGER, JR. Prairie du Chien Milwaukee Madison Milwaukee JIM DAN HILL MRS. VINCENT W. KOCH FREDERICK I. OLSON DR. WILLIAM D. STOVALL Madison Janesville Wauwautosa Madison Term Expires, 1965 GEORGE BANTA, JR. ROBERT B. L. MURPHY MILO K. SWANTON CEDRIC A. VIG Menasha Madison Madison Rhinelander GEORGE HAMPEL, JR. FOSTER B. PORTER FREDERICK N. TROWBRIDGE CLARK WILKINSON Des Moines Bloomington Green Bay Baraboo PHILIP F. LA FOLLETTE WILLIAM F. STARK ANTHONY WISE Madison Pewaukee Hayward Term Expires, 1966 SCOTT M. CUTLIP EDWARD FROMM MRS. HOWARD T. GREENE SAM RIZZO Madison Hamburg Genesee Depot Racine W.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: the Role of Planned Communities
    Greenfield Development Without Sprawl: The Role of Planned Communities Jim Heid Urban Land $ Institute About ULI–the Urban Land Institute ULI–the Urban Land Institute is a nonprofit education and research institute that is supported by its members. Its mis- sion is to provide responsible leadership in the use of land in order to enhance the total environment. ULI sponsors education programs and forums to encourage an open international exchange of ideas and sharing of experiences; initiates research that anticipates emerging land use trends and issues and proposes creative solutions based on that research; provides advisory services; and publishes a wide variety of materials to disseminate information on land use and development. Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than 20,000 members and associates from more than 60 countries representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines. ULI Working Papers on Land Use Policy and Practice. ULI is in the forefront of national discussion and debate on the leading land use policy and practice issues of the day. To encourage and enrich that dialogue, ULI publishes summaries of its forums on land use policy topics and commissions papers by noted thinkers on a range of topics relevant to its research and education agenda. Through its Working Papers on Land Use Policy and Practice series, the Institute hopes to increase the body of knowledge and offer useful insights that contribute to improvements in the quality of land use and real estate development practice throughout the country. Richard M. Rosan President About This Paper ULI Project Staff The Urban Land Institute is recognized as the leading Rachelle L.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Town/East Town
    Approximate boundaries: N-E. Ogden Ave (partial) E. State St;S -E. Clybourn St; E-E-Lincoln Memorial Dr;W -Milwaukee River DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION East Town (also known as Juneau Town) is a densely populated neighborhood with a variety of housing styles. There are many 19th century houses in the Tudor, Queen Anne and Italianate styles integrated with multi-unit apartment buildings and newer condos. The neighborhood has some wide boulevards with green space in the medians. The streets generally follow a grid pattern; the exceptions to this are Water Street and Prospect Avenue. Water Street tracks the bend of the river and Prospect Avenue follows the curve of the bluff over Lake Michigan along Juneau Park. The topography is flat except for a hill that slopes down to the river beginning around Jefferson Street. Most of Juneau Park is in East Town. There are two monuments in Juneau Park--one is a statue of Solomon Juneau and the other of Leif Erikson. Cathedral Square is a small park in the center of the neighborhood and hosts numerous events throughout the year (see outings section and neighborhood photos below). HISTORY East Town owes its origins to Solomon Juneau. In the 1830s Juneau platted the village of Milwaukee and settled there. He began selling plots of land in what was becoming known as Juneau Town. He set the location for downtown when he and his wife Josette opened a trading post at today’s Water Street and Wisconsin Avenue. Juneau went on to become the first mayor of Milwaukee in 1846 and the city’s first postmaster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Housing Affordability Crisis
    Addressing The Housing Affordability Crisis San Diego Housing Production Objectives 2018-2028 We’re About People “Increase the number of housing opportunities that serve low-income and homeless individuals and families in the City of San Diego” Strategic Plan Goal San Diego Housing Commission September 9, 2016 Message from the President & CEO September 21, 2017 Identifying solutions to the housing affordability crisis in the City of San Diego requires innovation, collaboration, and the will to take action. I commend and thank our City, County, State and Federal elected officials, as well as the San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) Board of Commissioners, for demonstrating their commitment to all three. When SDHC released our landmark report, “Addressing the Housing Affordability Crisis: An Action Plan for San Diego,” on November 25, 2015, we identified 11 recommended actions at the Local, State and Federal levels to reduce housing development costs and to increase production. To date, action has been taken on nine of these 11 recommendations, including the first—to set annual goals for housing production. To facilitate the creation of these goals for the City of San Diego, SDHC, in collaboration with San Diego City Councilmembers Scott Sherman and David Alvarez, the Chair and Vice Chair, respectively, of the City Council’s Smart Growth and Land Use Committee, studied the City’s overall housing production needs, its current supply, as well as its capacity for additional homes. Although the City of San Diego’s housing needs are even higher than previously estimated, the good news is that the City has enough capacity to create sufficient housing to meet our 10-year needs, as identified in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Council Quarterly Report Town of Cary, North Carolina Fy 2018 Fourth Quarter Cary Mayor & Town Council Members
    TOWN COUNCIL QUARTERLY REPORT TOWN OF CARY, NORTH CAROLINA FY 2018 FOURTH QUARTER CARY MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED LEADERSHIP, VISION AND SETTING THE CULTURE OF EXCELLENCE FOR OUR ORGANIZATION AND COMMUNITY. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH EACH OF YOU TO KEEP CARY GREAT. Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Council Member Harold Weinbrecht Lori Bush Ed Yerha Council Member Council Member Council Member Don Frantz Ken George Jennifer Robinson Council Member Jack Smith TOWN OF CARY FY 2018 4th Quarter Report Page 1 IN MOVING CARY FORWARD On behalf of our employees, thank you to for unanimously employees. We’re also pleased that WakeMed Cary shares adopting the FY 2019 budget. The document that will guide our commitment to easing the burdens of the opioid us into 2019 and beyond continues to set high standards epidemic on our community. We look forward to sharing for ourselves and the community and is reflective of the with Council the preliminary results of our Bloomberg exceptional services that our citizens have come to expect. pilot at the Quarterly meeting. Throughout this quarter we have refined our focus to reimagine our organization. This focus requires hard THREE AREAS OF NOTE THIS QUARTER INCLUDE: conversations. It requires self-examination and awareness ■ An update on the continued investment in our to ensure that everyone is playing a meaningful role in regional transit plan; specifically, detailed information shaping the organization we are becoming. To meet the related to the FY 2019 Wake Transit work plan. goals set forth in the Imagine Cary Community Plan, it’s ■ Cary Tennis Park and USA Baseball National Training critical that we align our people — their strengths and Center welcomed back the ACC and NCAA athletics skills — with the processes that we will need in the future.
    [Show full text]