Auckland Council District Plan (Waitakere Section)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Waitakere City Council Annual Report 2008/2009
Waitakere08 City Council Annual Report Including Sustainability Reporting 20 09 08This is Waitakere City Council’s Annual Report, including the Sustainability Report 20 2 Introduction // About the Annual Report and Sustainability 09 Contents SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING ACTIVITY STATEMENTS About the City 4 City Promotion 115 From the Mayor 7 Democracy and Governance 117 Report from the Chief Executive Officer 9 Emergency Management 119 Planning and Reporting Cycle 12 West Wave Aquatic Centre 122 How the Eco City has Developed 13 Arts and Culture 124 Stakeholders 15 Cemetery 129 Sustainability Challenges 18 Leisure 132 Community Outcomes and Strategic Direction 22 Libraries 135 Parks 139 QUADRUPLE BOTTOM LINE Housing for Older Adults 143 Social 28 City Heritage 145 Cultural 34 Transport and Roads 147 Economic 38 Animal Welfare 151 Environmental 48 Vehicle Testing Station 153 Awards Received 62 Consents, Compliance and Enforcement 155 GOVERNANCE Waste Management 159 Role and Structure of Waitakere City Council 64 Stormwater 163 Council Controlled Organisations 82 Wastewater 167 Statement of Compliance and Responsibility 98 Water Supply 171 COST OF SERVICES STATEMENTS BY Support and Planning 175 STRATEGIC PLATFORM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Urban and Rural Villages 100 Income Statement 181 Integrated Transport and Communication 103 Statement of Changes in Equity 182 Strong Innovative Economy 104 Balance Sheet 183 Strong Communities 105 Statement of Cash flows 185 Active Democracy 107 Statement of Accounting Policies 187 Green Network 108 Notes to -
31 Mar 2020 Organisation Category Requested Declined Approval
Grants Declined for the period 1 Oct 2019 - 31 Mar 2020 Organisation Category Requested Declined Approval Reason Ashburton Toy Library Inc Community $3,017.00 $3,017.00 Fully Declined 8 Drury Youth Charitable Trust Community $3,166.67 $3,166.67 Fully Declined 1 Waitakere City BMX Club Sport $2,627.38 $2,627.38 Fully Declined 8 Te Ha Ora The Asthma and Respiratory Foundation Charitable Trust Community $4,575.00 $4,575.00 Fully Declined 8 Auckland Basketball Services Ltd Sport $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Fully Declined 8 LU Combined Sports Assn Inc Sport $8,750.00 $8,750.00 Fully Declined 2 Home and Family Society Christchurch Branch Inc Community $15,809.95 $15,809.95 Fully Declined 2 Western Suburbs Soccer Club Inc Sport $7,200.30 $7,200.30 Fully Declined 8 Parent to Parent New Zealand Inc Wellington Community $9,750.00 $9,750.00 Fully Declined 8 Karekare Surf Life Saving Patrol Inc Community $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Paralympics New Zealand Inc Sport $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Suburbs New Lynn Cricket Club Sport $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Fully Declined 8 One Tree Point Bowling Club Inc Sport $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Touch Canterbury Inc Sport $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Croatian Cultural Society of New Zealand Inc Community $59,000.00 $59,000.00 Fully Declined 8 Rosehill College Education $12,643.54 $12,643.54 Fully Declined 3 NZ Barok Inc Community $1,300.00 $1,300.00 Fully Declined 8 Mamau Aotearoa Inc Sport $4,540.00 $4,540.00 Fully Declined 11 Seabrook McKenzie Trust for Specific Learning Disabilities -
Historic Heritage Evaluation Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) Hobsonville Headquarters and Parade Ground (Former)
Historic Heritage Evaluation Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) Hobsonville Headquarters and Parade Ground (former) 135 and 214 Buckley Avenue, Hobsonville Figure 1: RNZAF Headquarters (5 July 2017; Auckland Council) Prepared by Auckland Council Heritage Unit July 2017 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this document is to consider the place located at 135 and 214 Buckley Road, Hobsonville against the criteria for evaluation of historic heritage in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) (AUP). The document has been prepared by Emma Rush, Senior Advisor Special Projects – Heritage; and Rebecca Freeman – Senior Specialist Historic Heritage, Heritage Unit, Auckland Council. It is solely for the use of Auckland Council for the purpose it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. 2.0 Identification 135 Buckley Avenue, Hobsonville (Parade Ground) and 214 Buckley Avenue, Hobsonville (former Site address Headquarters) Legal description 135 Buckley Ave - LOT 11 DP 484575 and Certificate of 214 Buckley Ave - Section 1 SO 490900 Title identifier Road reserve – Lot 15 DP 484575 NZTM grid Headquarters – Northing: 5927369; Easting: reference 1748686 Parade Ground – Northing: 5927360; Easting: 1748666 Ownership 135 Buckley Avenue – Auckland Council 214 Buckley Avenue – Auckland Council Road reserve – Auckland Transport Auckland Unitary 135 Buckley Avenue (Parade Ground) Plan zoning Open Space – Informal Recreation Zone 214 Buckley Avenue (former Headquarters) Residential - Mixed Housing Urban Zone Existing scheduled Hobsonville RNZAF -
Scheduled Sites Appendix Scheduled Sites Appendix 2 NO
scheduled sites appendix SCHEDULED SITES ON WHICH RETAIL SALES ARE PERMITTED NO. NAME ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 Lower Don Buck Dairy and Chinese Takeaways 9-11 Don Buck Road, Massey Lot 29 DP 20202 2 Sunnybrae Superette 99 View Road, Massey Lot 4 DP 60230 3 Antique and Gift Shop 224 Henderson Valley Road and 2 Parrs Cross Road, Henderson Lot 6 DP 43997 Valley 4 Jalaram Dairy 9 Seabrook Ave, New Lynn Lots 1,3,4 DP 52483 5 Sheridan Superette 7 Sheridan Drive, New Lynn Lots 4,5,6,7 DP 46392 6 Dairy/Fruit Shop 47 Titirangi Road, New Lynn Lot 10 Deeds Plan 520 7 Pop Inn Dairy 466 West Coast Road, Oratia Lot 1 DP 155993 8 Drive In Dairy 3220 Great North Road, New Lynn Lot 2 DP 634 9 Hiran Dairy 3157 Great North Road, New Lynn Lots 5,6 DP 16325 10 Nikau Superette 2 Queen Mary Ave, New Lynn Lot 5 DP 42952 11 Astley Superette 143 Astley Ave, New Lynn Lot 1 DP 38310 12 Sai Superette 2 Barrys Road, Glendene Lot 171 DP 52191 13 Castleford Superette 18 Castleford St, Green Bay Lot 64 DP 60203 14 Oratia Superette 556 West Coast Road, Oratia Pt 536 SO39817 15 Croydon Dairy 143 Titirangi Road, Titirangi Lot 2 DP 51739 16 Waima Superette 84 Woodlands Park Road, Titirangi Pt Lot 1 DP 37794 17 West View Dairy 235 Titirangi Road, Titirangi Lot 4 DP 44621 18 Waitakere Superette 31 Township Road, Waitakere Lot 1 DP 54346 19 Taikata Superette and One Vacant 110 Taikata Road, Te Atatu Lot 1 DP 41424 20 Laingholm Beach Store and Takeaways Western Road, Laingholm Lot 274 DP 19098 21 Opportunity Shop 66 Victory Road, Laingholm Lot 9 DP 19099 22 Keiths Video Superette and Takeaways 428 Don Buck Road, Massey Lot 15 DP 41037 23 Tobys 120 Park Road, Titirangi Lot 2 DP 69071 24 Delegats Wine Estate 230 Hepburn Rd, Glendene Lot 2 DP 1931 25 Lincoln Vineyards Ltd 130 Lincoln Road, Henderson Lot 1 DP 64958 scheduled sites appendix 2 SCHEDULED SITES ON WHICH SERVICE STATIONS ARE PERMITTED NO. -
Soil Information Inventory: Patumahoe and Related Soils October 2018 Soil Information Inventory 16
Soil Information Inventory: Patumahoe and related soils October 2018 Soil Information Inventory 16 Soil Information Inventory 16: Patumahoe and related soils Compiled from published and unpublished sources by: M. Martindale (land and soil advisor, Auckland Council) D. Hicks (consulting soil scientist) P. Singleton (consulting soil scientist) Auckland Council Soil Information Inventory, SII 16 ISBN 978-1-98-858922-0 (Print) ISBN 978-1-98-858923-7 (PDF) 2 Soil information inventory 16: Patumahoe and related soils Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Dr Jonathan Benge Position: Manager, Environmental Monitoring, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Date: 1 October 2018 Recommended citation Martindale, M., D Hicks and P Singleton (2018). Soil information inventory: Patumahoe and related soils. Auckland Council soil information inventory, SII 16 © 2018 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. This publication must not be used in any way for any commercial purpose without the prior written consent of Auckland Council. Auckland Council does not give any warranty whatsoever, including without limitation, as to the availability, accuracy, completeness, currency or reliability of the information or data (including third party data) made available via the publication and expressly disclaim (to the maximum extent permitted in law) all liability for any damage or loss resulting from your use of, or reliance on the publication or the information and data provided via the publication. -
Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents' Survey
Public Transport for the Waitakere Ranges Residents’ Survey - Summary Report Prepared by Buzz Channel and Auckland Transport September 2017 Waitākere Ranges Public Transport Survey – Summary Report Page 1 of 69 Executive summary Auckland Transport and the Waitakere Ranges Local Board have been investigating what Public Transport services may be needed in the Waitakere Ranges area. In March/April 2016, Auckland Transport held a survey for residents of the following areas: French Bay, Henderson Valley, Huia, KareKare, Konini (Kaurilands Rd, Daffodil St, Konini Rd), Laingholm, Oratia, Parau, Paturoa Bay, Piha, South Titirangi, Te Henga (Bethells Beach), Waiatarua, Wood Bay and Woodlands Park. These areas were targeted because they either have no current public transport service, have limited service, or were having services removed when the new West Auckland bus network was implemented in June 2017. Participation In total 839 feedback forms were received. The areas with the highest participation were Huia/Cornwallis/Parau with 116 residents from this area responding, followed by Wood Bay/French Bay/Paturoa Bay/South Titirangi with 108 respondents, and thirdly Piha with 101 respondents. Initial findings In order to determine if there is sufficient demand for any new services, data was grouped by potential routes; i.e. feedback from people who lived in the same area and whose chosen destinations could be accommodated by the same route, was analysed together. In most cases the numbers of people who said they would use each of these potential routes, and how often they said they would use them, was not sufficient to operate a viable bus service. However, two possible scheduled services were identified which could be viable and would warrant further investigation. -
2009 Report Formatted
Corporate Responsibility Report 2008/09 From the Chairman This Corporate Responsibility Report is being released at a time of global economic turmoil. New Zealand is not immune from the pressures that are buffeting world markets and national economies. It is salutary to consider that the causes of our present difficulties derive in large part from unwise investments in the housing sector in the USA. It is also noteworthy that many governments around the world have put in place infrastructure investment packages designed to stimulate a rapid recovery from recession. Many of these are environmental enhancement and new housing projects. For our part, the Board of the Hobsonville Land Company is delighted that we have the final go-ahead from our Government for the Hobsonville Point development. The investment in creating a new town of 3000 houses will provide a real stimulus for the regional economy in the years ahead. This is a greenfields project, one where we start from scratch and design a new town. It is a big job and our Board has been committed from day one to applying best practice in urban design to maximise the quality of the finished product. We have a fantastic site with great natural attributes and we are determined to create a living and working environment with high amenities and a cohesive community. Our commitment to best practice includes applying modern environmental principles within the overall spending cap. We have looked carefully at stormwater management and how that can be integrated into the landscaping of the site. We are ensuring that houses are warm, comfortable and healthy by considering solar orientation and including high levels of insulation. -
Community to Hospital Shuttle Service
Is other transport assistance Total Mobility Scheme available? The Total Mobility Scheme is a subsidised taxi Best Care for Everyone Yes, there are several options available to those service. The scheme is available to people who qualify. who are unable to use public transport due to the nature of their disability. It works using vouchers that give a 50% discount on normal National Travel Assistance (NTA) Policy taxi fares. The scheme is part-funded by the NTA helps with travel costs for people who New Zealand Transport Agency and managed need to travel often or for long distances to get by the local authorities. to specialist health or disability services. The MAXX Contact Centre can provide the To receive this service, you need to be referred contact details for disability agencies that by your specialist (not your family doctor) to process applications. Call 09 366 6400 see another specialist or to receive specialist services. Both the specialists must be part of a St John Health Shuttle - Waitakere service funded by the government. The St John Health Shuttle provides safe, For example, this could be a renal dialysis reliable transport for Waitakere City residents centre, a specialist cancer service or a child to and from appointments with family doctors, development service. The rules are different treatment at Waitakere Hospital outpatient for children and adults, and for those holding clinics, visits to specialists, and transport to a Community Services Card. Sometimes, a and from minor day surgery. The vehicle is support person can receive assistance too. wheelchair accessible. The service operates Monday to Friday for appointments between How do I contact NTA? 9.30am and 2pm. -
Greening the City: Bringing Biodiversity Back Into the Urban Environment, P. 48-70
Section 2: Nature Friendly Environments — Communities Making it Happen Waitakere’s Green Network, a 10-year anniversary — the challenges and successes of implementing a biodiversity programme begun in 1993 Chris Ferkins1 Waitakere City Council Private Bag 93-109, Henderson, Waitakere City, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT In 1993 Waitakere City Council joined a group of some 2000 cities world-wide in taking the path to becoming sustainable cities — a direction that considers the impact our decisions today have on future generations and on the environment the city inhabits; a direction recommended to communities world- wide by The Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, through Agenda 21. When Waitakere City agreed to these recommendations they became the fi rst city in New Zealand to begin realigning to a sustainable objective. The eco city was born and a concept called the Green Network was developed. The Green Network is not just about enhancing biodiversity, but is a ‘healthy habitat for a city’ concept. The key element besides biodiversity is ecosystem services, and both have capacity to enhance the healthy functioning of biological and physical processes, to the benefi t of all living things within the city environment. Waitakere City faces similar challenges to the retention of biological diversity as other large New Zealand cities including land use intensifi cation, the spread of environmentally invasive weeds and the loss of vegetation and habitat. Waitakere however, has also retained signifi cant biodiversity helped by the mix of features that give variety to the landscape including coast, ranges (a large and recovering area of rainforest if somewhat frayed at the edges and in the vicinity of roadways), lowlands (containing fragmented remnant bush and wetland areas) and streams (retaining perhaps surprising levels of biodiversity). -
Waitakere City Council Presentation to the Auckland Regional Growth Forum on the Future of Whenuapai the Importance of Whenuapai Airport to Waitakere City
Waitakere City Council Presentation to the Auckland Regional Growth Forum on the Future of Whenuapai The Importance of Whenuapai Airport to Waitakere City • Civil use of Whenuapai is now Waitakere City’s most important long term development issue – Economic benefits – Transport benefits – City benefits • Live – Work – Play – “Plan B” is a lot worse What Are The Alternatives? • Ongoing use as an Airport • A Public Work • Rural Residential Sites • Waitakere City Council has rights under section 50 of the Public Works Act – The real alternatives are a public work and/or an Airport Whenuapai Area Direct Economic Impact • Defence closure – NZIER calculation (unchallenged) • $250m annual loss to Auckland’s northwest sector • $230m loss to Waitakere City. – 1647 jobs will be lost. 826 families – 2.3% of Waitakere’s GDP – 135% of Council’s total budget • Civil Airport by far the best replacement – BERL analysis – Other concepts are pie in the sky Indirect Economic Impact Auckland Region People Capacity 2050 • North-West Auckland is 70 60 New Zealand’s fastest 50 40 growing population 30 20 10 0 Northern Growth Auckland City Southern Zone Index Region Auckland 2001 = 100 Zone Population 2001 Population Capacity 2050 • 60% of Waitakere Auckland Region People Patterns 2001 and 50% North 60 Shore workers 50 40 leave daily for work 30 20 10 % of Region of Total % 0 Northern Zone Auckland City Southern Zone Population Employment Why Waitakere Wants Whenuapai Developed As A Civil Airport • Economic 9 Local Job Creation 9 Economic Stimulation 9 Supports the development of planned employment areas • Transport 9 Reduced road congestion. $341million gain / no cost 9 More efficent use of exisiting network 9 Improved airport access for >50% Aucklanders 9 Local employment = less travel "Travel time is worth a week's holiday every two months," said Alasdair Thompson, EMA's chief executive. -
Auckland Transport
AUCKLAND TRANSPORT – BUILDING A SUCCESSFUL ORGANISATION FROM SCRATCH – AN ENGINEER’S PERSPECTIVE Jacqueline Robson Manager Investigation and Design North, Auckland Transport, Auckland, New Zealand Abstract Auckland Transport was formed as a result of the Local Government (Tamaki Makaurau Reorganisation) Act 2009. The legislation provided for the dissolution of the eight local and regional authorities in Auckland on 31 October 2010. Auckland Transport is a Council-Controlled Organisation that combines the transport expertise and functions of the former local and regional councils. Auckland Transport is a Road Controlling Authority and is responsible for all of the region’s transport services (excluding state highways) from roads and footpaths to cycling, parking and public transport. On 1 November 2010, 848 people, from various backgrounds and from eight very different local authorities, came together for the first time to take on new roles in new areas and/or new teams. Two years later, Auckland Transport has demonstrated a step-change in the delivery of transport infrastructure and is achieving or over-achieving on almost all of its performance measures. How did this happen? Was it by accident or by design? This paper describes, from an engineer’s perspective, the challenges encountered, the obstacles overcome and some of the methods employed in creating the successful organisation that Auckland Transport is today. Key Words Auckland Transport, council, amalgamation, capital works, investigation, design, project management. Introduction are the budget holders for the projects and have an overarching view of the entire project Auckland Transport (AT) came into being on lifecycle from planning to construction. They 1 November 2010 and, for the first time in also have particular responsibility for Auckland’s history, all of the city’s transport managing professional services contracts to functions and operations fell under the deliver the investigation and design phases of management of one organisation. -
Discovering the Hindrance of Walking and Cycling in Auckland’S Urban Form
DISCOVERING THE HINDRANCE OF WALKING AND CYCLING IN AUCKLAND’S URBAN FORM. MEYER NEESON A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Urban Design at the University of Auckland, 2020. Abstract Active transport is a fundamental element in a city’s movement network that promotes a sustainable and resilient urban future, yet can only be viable in an urban setting that supports small-scale infrastructure with appropriate street environments. The 1950’s planning regimes have been dominant within Auckland’s transport development with perpetuated traditional aims of increased efficiency and high level infrastructure which enables travel in the comfort of a private vehicle. Attitudes have formulated the urban fabric through funding and investment intervention which resulted in a strong motorway network and low density, sprawling residential suburbs. Psychological public response to this environment is reflected in the heavy reliance on the private vehicle and low rates of walking and cycling. Although Auckland’s transport framework identifies the need for walking and cycling to actively form a strand of Auckland’s transport network, institutional and intellectual embedded ideas of the 1950’s prevent implementation on the ground. The failure of Auckland’s urban form was highlighted in the period of the Covid-19; post lockdown the public reverted back to old transport habits when restrictions were lifted. This pandemic put our city in the spotlight to identify its shortfalls and the urgent need to support a resilient future. Therefore, this research aims to discover the inherent infrastructure and funding barriers that hinder the growth of walking and cycling as a transport method in Auckland.