DOCSLIB.ORG

Algebra and Grammar: a Peanian Analysis of Everyday English

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algebra and Grammar: a Peanian Analysis of Everyday English Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 Algebra and Grammar: A Peanian Analysis of Everyday English Michele Malatesta* 1. Peano's Latino sine flexione. It is well known that, by following Leibniz's intuition, Giuseppe Peano constructed the Latino sine flexione, i.e. Latin without inflexion. The rules of LSF (Latino sine flexione) are the following: (1) grammatical cases are superfluous since they can be expressed by prepositions; (2) grammatical genders are superfluous as in Chinese; (3) grammatical numbers are superfluous as in Chinese (N.B. Grammatical numbers not arithmetic numbers are superfluous); (4) conjugations of verbs are superfluous: it is sufficient to express the personal pronouns I, You, He, She, It, etc. as in Chinese; (5) verb tenses are superfluous since the time is expressible by means of adverbs as in Chinese. Note that Peano did not axiomatize LSF.1 * Presented at 3rd International Symposium on Systems Research Informatics and Cybernetics, Baden-Baden (Germany), August 12-18, 1991, in the Plenary Session on Logic and Mathematics of day August 16. 1 An attempt to axiomatize LSF is found in FREGUGLIA [1977] 305-317 and [1978] 72-75. In both works, the author given five general axioms and three specific axioms, proves two theorems. “Assiomi generali A.6.1: Siano , , ecc. simboli per elementi grammaticali, allora se = + 21 Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 si ha : = - = - A.6.2: Indichi 0 l'elemento grammaticale «de valore nullo» allora se = si ha - = 0 A.6.3: ± 0 = 0 + = A.6.4: - = - + = 0 A.6.5: ± ( ± ) = ( ± ) ± C Assiomi specifici A'.6.1: V = es + A = habe + N dove es e habe, imperativi latini dei verbi esse e habere, vengono usati secondo l'interlingua per indicare genericamente i verbi essere e avere. A'.6.2: A = que + V = cum + N = V + -nte A'.6.3: N = V + -ore. Teoremi TEOREMA 6.1: L'elemento grammaticale cum ha la stessa funzione grammaticale dell'elemento que habe (nel senso che possono sostituirsi scambievolmente in una generica frase che contenga o l'uno o l'altro). Dimostrazione: Dall'assioma A3.6.2 si ha: A = cum + N applicando ora lo A.6.1 si ha cum = A - N applicando lo A.6.2 " " cum = A + 0 - N " " A.6.4 " " cum = A - V + V - N " " A.6.5 " " cum = (A - V) + (V - N) (i) Sempre dall'assioma A'.6.2 si ha: A = que + V da cui per A.6.1 si ottiene (ij) que = A - V. A sua volta dall'assioma A'.6.1 si ha : V = habe + N da cui per A.6.1 discende (iij) habe = V - N. Sostituendo (ij) e (iij) in (i) si ha cum = que habe, c.v.d. TEOREMA 6.2: Gli elementi grammaticali que es (colui che è), es -nte, habe -ore hanno valore nullo (nel senso che grammaticalmente non rappresentano niente, cioè sono «eliminabili»). Dimostrazione: Dall'assioma A'.6.1 per A.6.1 si ha es = V - A " " A'.6.2 " " " que = A - V " " A'.6.2 " " " -nte = A - V allora: que es = (A - V) + (V - A) = applicando A.6.5 = A - V + V - A = " A.6.4 = A + 0 - A = " A.6.3 = A - A = " A.6.4 22 Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 2. English language trend to Chinese. The English Language is placed at the periphery of the Indo- European Group and, among the Western languages, expresses the maximum trend towards the Chinese. Let we examine the following table: Classical German Classical Italian English Greek Latin Spanish French C ( ) ( ) ( ) indef ( ) + a Art def + + ( ) ( ) ( ) s Subst + + + ( ) ( ) e Adj + + + ( ) ( ) s — attrib + + ( ) ( ) predic G ( ) ( ) + — indef + e Art def + + ( ) + — n Subst NR NR NR NR NR d Adj + + + — + e attrib + — + + — r predic s G n ( ) ( ) + + indef + r u Art def + + ( ) + — a m Subst + + + + + m b Adj + + + — + m e attrib + — + + — a r predic t s = 0 così anche: es -nte = (V - A) + (A - V ) = 0 Dall'assioma A'.6.1 per A.6.1 si ha: habe = V - N " A'.6.3 " " " -ore = N - V per cui analogamente a sopra si ha: habe -ore = (V - N) + (N - V) = 0 c.v.d.” 23 Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 T Past + + + + — e Present + + + + + n Future + + + + — s e s 14/18 14/18 11.18 12.18 3/18 77.77% 77.77% 61.11% 66.66% 16.66% This is a synoptic table of some grammatical categories. It considers only the following languages: Classical Greek, German, Classical Latin, Italian, Spanish, French, English. The sign ‘( )’ shows that a given grammatical part does not exist in the corresponding language; the sign ‘+’ indicates that a given grammatical part belongs to the corresponding language and has inflections; the sign ‘ — ’ denotes that a given grammatical part belongs to the corresponding language but is without inflexions; the signe 'NR’ shows that a given grammatical part belongs to the corresponding language but is not remarkable from the inflexion standpoint. Classical Greek has cases, and therefore inflexions, in the definite articles, in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. German has cases, and therefore inflexions, in the indefinite and definite articles, in substantives and in attributive adjectives. Classical Latin has cases, and therefore inflexions, in substantives and in attributive and predicative adjectives. Italian, Spanish, French and English do not have cases. Classical Greek has genders in the definite articles, in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. German has genders in the indefinite and definite articles, in substantives, in attributive adjectives. Classical Latin has genders in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. Italian, Spanish and French have genders in the indefinite and definite articles, in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. English has genders in substantive but they are not relevant 24 Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 from the inflexion standpoint. Classical Greek has grammatical numbers in the definite articles, in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. German has grammatical numbers in the indefinite and definite articles, in substantives, in attributive adjectives. Classical Latin has grammatical genders in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. Italian, Spanish and French have grammatical numbers in the indefinite and definite articles, in substantives, in attributive and predicative adjectives. English has grammatical numbers only in indefinte articles and in substantives. Classical Greek, German, Classical Latin, Italian, Spanish and French have tense inflexions in the past, in the present and in the future. The English language, apart from the verb to be and the indicative present of to have, has tense inflexions only in the third singular person of the indicative present. With regard to examined grammatical elements and leaving aside the substantive gender which is not remarkable for its own inflexions, note the following: - in Classical Greek the inflexions are 14/18 equal to 77,77 %; if we consider that this language has no indefinite articles, then we obtain the following inflexion number 14/15 equal to 93,33 %; - in German the inflexions are 14/18 equal to 77,77 %; - in Classical Latin the inflexions are 11/18 equal to 61,11 %; if we consider that this language has no indefinite and definite articles, then we obtain the following inflexion number 11/12 equal to 91,66 %; - in Italian, Spanish, French the inflexions are 12/18 equal to 66,66 %; if we consider that these languages have no cases, then we obtain the following inflexion number 12/13 equal to 92,30 %; - in English the inflexions are 3/18 equal to 16,66 %; now, if we consider that this language has no cases, then we obtain the following inflexion number 3/13 equal to 23,07 %. Therefore, whatever statistical criterion we choose when we analyze West languages, English is the one with the lowerst number of 25 Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 inflexions, and, consequently, the one nearest to Chinese. At this point we see that a Peanian analysis of English is very easy. 3. English without inflexion. Now we construct an artificial English language by reducing every English verb to its theme, by selecting among relative pronouns the only pronoun that, and by eliminating every inflexion from the verbs to be and to have. We study EWI (English without inflexion) by means of algebraic equations analogous to those in Peano's De derivatione and Algebra de grammatica. We shall give two distinct axiomatic patterns: in the first one we take as axioms four laws of standard algebra without proving their independence, as is usual in abstract algebra handbooks;2 in the second one, the most rigorous, we put as axioms three linguistic equations whose independence we prove. 4. First axiomatic version. 3.1 Syntax Let ‘A ’, ‘B ’ be symbols of grammatical elements. Let ‘A’ (Adjective), ‘V’ (Verb), ‘S’ (Abstract Substantive), ‘Es’ (Ending of Abstract Substantive) be the names of grammatical elements. The signs ‘0’, ‘+’, ‘-’, ‘=’ belong to the language. RULES OF FORMATION - 0 is a grammatical element; 2 Amongst others see P. J. HIGGINS [1975] 7 sgg. Freguglia also does not give any proof of independence of the algebraic axioms of Peano's Algebra de grammatica. See FREGUGLIA [1977] and [1978] cit. 26 Metalogicon (1992) V, 1 - all the adjectives, verbs and abstract substantives belonging to the English language are grammatical elements and the words ‘that ’, ‘with ’, ‘to’ are grammatical elements; the sign ‘Es’ i.e. “Ending of Abstract Substantive” is a grammatical element; - the names of grammatical elements are grammatical elements; - if A is a grammatical element, then +A and -A are grammatical elements; - if A and B are grammatical elements, then A +B and A -B are grammatical elements; - if A and B are grammatical elements, then A =B is a linguistic equation; - if A =B is a linguistical equation, and A = 0 or B= 0, then A =B is a satisfied linguistic equation; - there are no other grammatical elements nor linguistic equations nor satisfied linguistic equations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Perfect Language and the Mathematicians
    Jekyll.comm 1 – marzo 2002 Mathematicians and the perfect language: Giuseppe Peano’s case By Daniele Gouthier, Nico Pitrelli and Ivan Pupolizo Master’s Degree Course in Scientific Communication – ISAS – Trieste – Italy Attempts to create an International Artificial Language (IAL) have kept pace with the evolution of modern science. Ever since Galileo’s time, scientists have been interested in how to create a perfect language (the adjective “perfect” takes on the meaning of “universal” or “unambiguous” depending on the period) capable of supporting communication at a horizontal level i.e. within the scientific community, and at a vertical level, i.e. between scientists and the public. The first goal of this article is to describe briefly how this need for a perfect language developed over the past years. Special attention will be spent on the mathematicians’ role, especially Giuseppe Peano’s. The second goal is to illustrate how Giuseppe Peano’s contribution to this debate proved twofold and led to various conclusions. The Italian mathematician played a leading role in the creation of a perfect language, both at a horizontal and a vertical level. On the one hand, there is his successful attempt to introduce a standard logical and symbolic system of notation, which became essential for communication among mathematicians. On the other hand, there is the complete failure of his ambitious Latino sine flexione (Latin without inflection), a perfect language which died with its creator. Introduction People have been interested in the creation of a perfect language for more than two thousand years. From ancient Greek philosophers to present PC programmers, the search for a universal language is ever present in the history of culture and, more specifically, of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Esperanto?
    Fiat Lingua Title: The Contemporary Esperanto Speech Community Author: Adelina Solis MS Date: 01-12-2013 FL Date: 01-01-2013 FL Number: FL-000010-01 Citation: Solis, Adelina. 2013. “The Contemporary Esperanto Speech Community.” FL-000010-01, Fiat Lingua, <http:// fiatlingua.org>. Web. 01 Jan. 2013. Copyright: © 2013 Adelina Solis. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Fiat Lingua is produced and maintained by the Language Creation Society (LCS). For more information about the LCS, visit http://www.conlang.org/ The Contemporary Esperanto Speech Community by Adelina Mariflor Solís Montúfar 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 3 1.1 Definitions 4 1.2 Political support for a universal language 5 1.3 A brief history of language invention 9 1.4 A brief history of Esperanto 14 1.5 The construction, structure, and dissemination of Esperanto 17 1.6 Esperanto and the culture question 24 1.7 Research Methods 29 Chapter 2: Who Speaks Esperanto? 34 2.1 Number and distribution of speakers 34 2.2 Gender distribution 47 Chapter 3: The Esperanto Speech Community 58 3.1 Terminology and definitions 58 3.2 Norms and Ideologies 65 3.3 Approach to language 70 Chapter 4: Why Esperanto? 81 4.1 Ideology-based reasons to speak Esperanto 83 4.2 Practical attractions to Esperanto 86 4.3 More than friendship 94 4.4 The congress effect 95 4.5 Esperanto for the blind 100 4.6 Unexpected benefits 102 Chapter 5: Esperantist Objectives 103 5.1 Attracting new speakers 103 5.2 Teaching Esperanto 107 Chapter 6: Conclusion 116 Works Cited 121 2 Chapter 1: Introduction When we think about invented languages, we may think of childhood games.
    [Show full text]
  • Latinidaj Planlingvoj (AIS-Kurso, 1 Studunuo)
    Vĕra Barandovská-Frank: Latinidaj planlingvoj (AIS-kurso, 1 studunuo) La Latina apartenas al la italika grupo de la hindeŭropa lingvofamilio (tiu ĉi lingvofamilio ampleksas i.a. preskaŭ ĉiujn eŭropajn lingvojn, ekz. grupon ĝermanan kaj slavan), el la Latina evoluiĝis etnaj lingvoj nomataj Romanaj ( = latinidaj), precipe itala, romanĉa, sarda, franca, okcitana, hispana, kataluna, galega, portugala, gudezma, rumana, moldava. Latinidaj planlingvoj estas similaj al la Romanaj lingvoj kaj ofte imitas ilian evoluon. Latina skribo (el la greka kaj etruska alfabetoj): originale 20 majusklaj literoj (maiuscula): A B C D E F H I K L M N O P Q R S T V X . Literon I oni uzis ankaŭ por la sono [j], literon C ankaŭ por G, poste diferenciĝis [k] kaj [g]. U kaj V estis la sama litero: majuskle ekzistis nur V, poste minuskle (minuscula) u: VENIO – uenio (minuskloj evoluiĝis el la mezepoka karolinga alfabeto). En la klasika latina ne estis K, k, J j, U, u, v, W, w, Y, y, Z, z poste trans- prenitaj aŭ el la greka alfabeto (K, U, Y, Z ), aŭ faritaj el jam ekzistantaj literoj (J, W). Restaŭrita prononco: vokaloj longaj kaj mallongaj. La litero V/u estas aŭ konsonanta [ŭ] aŭ vokala [u]; i (j) aŭ konsonanta [j] aŭ vokala [i]. La litero c prononciĝis kiel [k]; qu kiel [kŭ]; au kiel [aŭ]; ae kiel [aj]; oe kiel [oj]. h estis antikve ĉiam prononcata, sed iom post iom malaperis. En helenaj pruntvortoj estis uzataj ch, ph, th [kh]/[ĥ], [ph], [th], poste [k], [p], [t]. La akcento ĝenerale troviĝis sur la antaŭlasta silabo, se ĝia vokalo estis longa, aŭ je la antaŭantaŭlasta, se mallonga, ekz.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities for Passives in Natural and Artificial Languages
    Christo Moskovsky & Alan Libert 101 Journal of Universal Language 5 September 2004, 101-149 Possibilities for Passives in Natural and Artificial Languages Christo Moskovsky & Alan Libert University of Newcastle Abstract The Passive Voice is a category which we find in the large majority of natural languages, and also in most artificial languages. The first major part of this paper offers a survey of passive constructions in a number of typologically distinct natural languages, with the basic aim of presenting the (prospective) artificial language constructor with the range of functional and formal properties of the Passive Voice which occur in natural languages. This survey shows that regardless of the fair amount of variation in the morphosyntactic form of passives that we find in different natural languages, crosslinguistically passives are remarkably uniform in inevitably occurring as a grammatical category marked (synthetically or analytically) on the verb; they are also remarkably uniform in relation to the basic function they perform: passivization inevitably involves demotion of a primary clausal term (the Subject) and in most of the cases also promotion of a non-primary term. The next part of the paper offers an overview of Passive Voice formation and function in artificial languages, which will provide the language constructor with a good idea of some of the ‘design’ decisions taken with regard to this grammatical category. Finally, the paper briefly discusses various design issues in relation to economy, explicitness/ambiguity, 102 Possibilities for Passives in Natural and Artificial Languages functionality, and learnability and presents some specific recommendations with regard to the possible design of passives in an artificial language.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrality of International Languages*
    Haitao Liu 37 Journal of Universal Language 7 September 2006, 37-64 Neutrality of International Languages* Haitao Liu Communication University of China Abstract This paper focuses on the neutrality of international languages. First, a derivation of the concept of “neutral language” from “inter- national communicative act” is provided; it is argued that an acceptable neutral language for international communication can only be an artificial language. Certain characterizations of consciously created languages are discussed. The paper distinguishes two types of neutrality: communicative neutrality and linguistic neutrality. All planned languages are communicatively neutral, but their linguistic neutrality varies, reflecting the diversity of language design principles. Given that absolute linguistic neutrality unattainable, it becomes reasonable to construct a language based on certain control languages plus linguistic universals. We introduce the term “deneutralization” to designate a process whereby a neutral language changes into an ordinary language. The paper also shows that Esperanto has not become deneutralized. Keywords: international language, neutrality, deneutralization, artificial language, planned language, universal language, Esperanto * I am grateful to Detlev Blanke for insightful discussion. I’d also like to thank Probal Dasgupta for providing detailed comments and correcting my English. 38 Neutrality of International Languages 1. Introduction Today English is already a global language (Crystal 1997), but many people still consider that it is not an ideal solution for international communication. Wright (2000: 246-247) mentions one reason for this in her book on the role of language in nation-state building and European integration: “They [artificial languages] are ideally suited to the role [of lingua franca] since they are not the languages of European nations of states.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Constructed Language and Linguistic Theory Marc Van Oostendorp To
    Constructed language and linguistic theory Marc van Oostendorp To appear in: Klaus Schubert (ed.) Planned language: From plan to reality. Association Belgique de Linguistique Appliquée, 2000. 0. Introduction ‘Natural language’ is arguably the most central concept within linguistic theory —it defines its object of study —, but it is hardly ever discussed outside the first pages of introductory textbooks. It is usually taken for granted that everybody knows what the label means, and that it can be applied to American English, Yidiny and Eastern Javanese, but not to tonal music, the programming language Prolog, or the languages of the Elves in the novels of J.R.R. Tolkien. Many interlinguists — those scholars concerned with the study of consciously planned languages meant for international communication — follow this line of reasoning to some extent, if they defend the validity of their interest in Esperanto (cf. Schubert 1989, Tonkin and Fettes 1996 for fairly recent overviews). They argue that Esperanto is markedly different from other planned languages, because it has been used in a much wider range of communicative situations, because it has become associated with a separate ‘Esperantist culture’, or because it is learnt by children as one of their native languages. For this reason, Esperanto would have started to differ from its competitors: it would be the only ‘language project’ that has succeeded in becoming a ‘real (natural) language’. This line of argumentation is examined in this article. I study the relevance of some planned or constructed languages other than Esperanto, viz. Interlingua, Ido, Europanto and Spocanian. These have been made up in slightly different ways, all serve different goals and different philosophies have guided the construction of their respective grammars.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistica E Filologia È Inclusa in ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
    Linguistica e Filologia è inclusa in ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences) Internet: http://aisberg.unibg.it/handle/10446/6133 I contributi contenuti nella rivista sono indicizzati nelle banche dati Modern Language Association (MLA) International Bibliography e Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts (LLBA), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) e Web of Science Licenza Creative Commons : This journal is published in Open Access under a Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). You are free to share – copy, distribute and transmit – the work under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Volume pubblicato dal Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Culture Straniere e finanziato con fondi di Ateneo di ricerca. ISSN: 1594-6517 Linguistica e Filologia 40 Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Culture Straniere UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI BERGAMO 2020 BERGAMO UNIVERSITY PRESS sestante edizioni Direzione della rivista Giuliano Bernini , Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Direttore responsabile Régine Delamotte , Université de Rouen Klaus Düwel , Universität Göttingen Edgar Radtke , Universität Heidelberg Comitato editoriale Maria Grazia Cammarota , Università degli Studi di Bergamo Ada Valentini , Università
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Two Planned Languages And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Research Information System University of Turin CHAPTER TWO PLANNED LANGUAGES AND LANGUAGE PLANNING: THE CONTRIBUTION OF INTERLINGUISTICS TO CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION FEDERICO GOBBO A new science is developing, Interlinguistics–that branch of the science of language which deals with the structure and basic ideas of all languages with the view to the establishing of a norm for interlanguages, i.e. auxiliary languages destined for oral and written use between people who cannot make themselves understood by means of their mother tongues. —Otto Jespersen (1931) Since the end of the 19th century up to the first half of the 20th century, the quest for “a norm for interlanguages” was a hotly debated issue among linguistic scholars and amateurs. In fact, about 1,000 language projects were proposed in that period, especially in Europe: the strongest effort for cross-cultural connection ever made (Albani-Buonarroti 1994). What can be inferred from it, in terms of language planning? Is there any relation or analogy between the issues encountered in natural language planning contexts (e.g. officialization, language revitalization, standardization) and interlanguage planning? Are there any general rules that can be deduced from the main historical developments of the above mentioned “quest”? Although Tauli (1968) considered interlinguistics as “the science of international language planning” (i.e. a branch of the science of language planning) very few linguists involved in language planning paid attention to interlinguistics until now. In this analysis of planned international language, the role of language amateurs will not be underestimated.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Fluffy Bunnies
    In Praise of Fluffy Bunnies Copyright © 2012, Richard Forsyth. Background Reading John Lanchester's Whoops!, an entertaining account of how highly paid hotshot traders in a number of prestigious financial institutions brought the world to the brink of economic collapse, I was struck by the following sentence: "In an ideal world, one populated by vegetarians, Esperanto speakers and fluffy bunny wabbits, derivatives would be used for one thing only: reducing levels of risk." (Lanchester, 2010: 37). What struck me about this throwaway remark, apart from the obvious implication that derivatives were actually used to magnify risk rather than reducing it (doubtless by carnivores ignorant of Esperanto), was its presumption that right-thinking readers would take it for granted that Esperanto symbolizes well-meaning futility -- thus highlighting the author's status as a tough-minded realist. This is just one illustration that disdain for Esperanto in particular, and auxiliary languages in general, pervades intellectual circles in Britain today, as in many other countries. And if you dare to raise the subject of constructed international languages with a professional translator or interpreter be prepared not just for disdain but outright hostility. Of course professional interpreters are among the most linguistically gifted people on the planet, and can't see why the rest of us shouldn't become fluent in half a dozen natural languages in our spare time. (Not to mention the fact that a widespread adoption of Esperanto, or one of its competitors, would have a seriously negative impact on their opportunities for gainful employment.) Thus Esperanto has become a symbol of lost causes, to be dismissed out of hand by practical folk.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Drapeaux Des Langues Construites
    Les Drapeaux des Langues Construites Patrice de La Condamine Résumé Depuis toujours, les hommes oscillent entre la préservation de leurs identités particulières et leur besoin d’appartenance à des communautés globales. L’idée d’universel et de recherche de la “fusion des origines” hante leur cœur. Dans cet esprit, des langues construites ont été élaborées. Qu’elles soient à vocation auxiliaire ou internationale, destinées à de vastes aires culturelles ou à but strictement philosophique. Des noms connus comme Volapük, Espéranto, Ido, Bolak, Interlingua, Occidental. Mais aussi Glosa, Kotava, Lingua Franca Nova, Atlango. Ou encore Folskpraat, Slovio, Nordien, Afrihili, Slovianski, Hedšdël. Sans parler du langage philosophique Lojban1. Le plus intéressant est de constater que toutes ces langues ont des drapeaux qui traduisent les messages et idéaux des groupes en question! La connaissance des drapeaux des langues construites est primordiale pour plusieurs raisons: elle nous permet de comprendre que tous les drapeaux sans exception délivrent des messages d’une part; que l’existence des drapeaux n’est pas forcément liée à l’unique notion de territoire d’autre part. Le drapeau est d’abord et avant tout, à travers son dessin et ses couleurs, un “territoire mental”. Après avoir montré et expliqué ces différents drapeaux2, nous conclurons avec la présentation du drapeau des Conlang, sorte d’ONU des Langues construites! Folkspraak Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Vexillology, Washington, D.C., USA 1–5 August 2011 © 2011 North American Vexillological Association (www.nava.org) 1 Sélection de noms parmi d’autres. 2 Une trentaine environ. 175 LES DRAPEAUX DES LANGUES CONSTRUITES introduction A nous tous qui sommes réunis ici pour ce XXIVème Congrès International de la vexillologie à Washington, personne n’a plus besoin d’expliquer la nécessité vitale qu’ont les hommes de se représenter au moyen d’emblèmes, et nous savons la place primordiale qu’occupent les drapeaux dans cette fonction.
    [Show full text]
  • Interlingvistiko
    Interlingvistiko Enkonduko en la sciencon pri planlingvoj 1 2 Universitato Adam Mickiewicz – Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza Interlingvistikaj Studoj – Studia Interlingwistyki Vĕra Barandovská-Frank Interlingvistiko Enkonduko en la sciencon pri planlingvoj Poznań 2020 3 Interlingvistikaj Studoj 1 Redaktanto de la serio – Redaktor serii: Ilona Koutny Redaktanto de la volumo – Redaktor tomu: Ilona Koutny Reviziantoj – Recenzenci: Wim Jansen, Ida Stria Bildo en la titolpaĝo – Obraz na okładce: Katalin Kováts Plano de titolpaĝo – Projekt okładki: Ilona Koutny © Teksto – Tekst: Vĕra Barandovská-Frank © Bildo – Obraz na okładce: Katalin Kováts © Eldono – Edycja: Wydawnictwo Rys Publikigita kun subteno de Akademio Internacia de la Sciencoj San Marino dofinansowane przez Międzynarodową Akademię Nauk San Marino Wydanie I Poznań 2020 ISBN 978-83-65483-88-1 Wydanie: Wydawnictwo Rys Dąbrówka, ul. Kolejowa 41 62-070 Dopiewo tel. 600 44 55 80 e-mail: [email protected] www.wydawnictworys.com 4 Enhavtabelo Antaŭparolo ..................................................................................................................... 9 Enkonduko .................................................................................................................... 11 1. Interlingvistiko kiel scienco ..................................................................................... 15 2. Antikvaj interlingvoj ................................................................................................ 27 2.1. La aramea lingvo ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bahá'í Short Obligatory Prayer in Various Constructed Languages
    Bahá’í Short Obligatory Prayer in Various Constructed Languages Original Arabic ِ ِ ِ ﱠ ِ ِِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ِ ْأَﺷﻬَُد ﻳﺎ إﻟﻬﻲ ﺑﺄَﻧ َك َﺧﻠَْﻘﺗَﻧ ْﻲ ﻟﻌْرﻓﺎﻧ َك َوﻋ َﺑﺎدﺗ َك، ْأَﺷﻬَُد ﻓﻲ ﻫذا ْاﻟﺣْﻳن ﺑ َﻌ ْﺟزْي َوﻗُﱠوﺗ َك َو َﺿ ْﻌ ﻔ ْﻲ َو ْاﻗﺗدار َك ِ ِ ِ ﱠ ِ َوﻓَْﻘِرْي َوَﻏﻧﺎﺋ َك، ﻻ إﻟﻪ َ إﻻ ْأَﻧ َت ُاﻟﻣﻬَْﻳﻣ ُن اﻟﻘَﱡﻳ ُوم . Authorized English Translation I bear witness, O my God, that Thou hast created me to know Thee and to worship Thee. I testify, at this moment, to my powerlessness and to Thy might, to my poverty and to Thy wealth. There is none other God but Thee, the Help in Peril, the Self-Subsisting. Esperanto Mi atestas, ho Sinjoro, mia Dio, ke Vi kreis min, por ke mi konu kaj adoru Vin. Mi atestas ĉimomente pri mia senforteco kaj pri Via Potenco, pri mia malriĉeco kaj pri Via Riĉeco. Ne ekzistas alia Dio krom Vi, la Defendanto, la Mem‐Ekzistanto. Interlingua Io testimonia, o mie Deo, que tu me ha create, pro Te cognoscer e adorar. Io testimonia in iste instante a mie debilitate e a Tie potentia, a mie paupertate e a Tie ricchessa. No existe áltere Deo salvo Tu, le adjutor en perículo, le in se mesmoexistente. Sambahsa Io schahide O mien Div od me has creen kay gnohe Te ed dyines Te, io schahide ye tod tid mien achizia ed Tien augos ed mien sliebe ed Tien force ed mien paupertat ed Tien rey, ne est div ploisko Te iom Behrger ed iom Swobod.
    [Show full text]