List of Liquidators
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Impact of International Law on the Application of Islamic Law in Saudi Arabia
Hamzah, Dawood Adesola (2015) Impact of international law on the application of Islamic law in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/18432 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Impact of International Law on the Application of Islamic Law in Saudi Arabia Dawood Adesola Hamzah Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD 2015 Department of Law School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Declaration for PhD Thesis I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulation for student of the SOAS, University of London concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person. I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work which I present for examination. -
IN the SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mr. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah C.P.1290-L/2019 (Against the Order of Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 31.01.2019, passed in W.P. No. 5898/2019) D. G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. ...….Petitioner(s) Versus Government of Punjab through its Chief Secretary, Lahore, etc. …….Respondent(s) For the petitioner(s): Mr. Salman Aslam Butt, ASC. For the respondent(s): Ms. Aliya Ejaz, Asstt. A.G. Dr. Khurram Shahzad, D.G. EPA. M. Nawaz Manik, Director Law, EPA. M. Younas Zahid, Dy. Director. Fawad Ali, Dy. Director, EPA (Chakwal). Kashid Sajjan, Asstt. Legal, EPA. Rizwan Saqib Bajwa, Manager GTS. Research Assistance: Hasan Riaz, Civil Judge-cum-Research Officer at SCRC.1 Date of hearing: 11.02.2021 JUDGEMENT Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, J.- The case stems from Notification dated 08.03.2018 (“Notification”) issued by the Industries, Commerce and Investment Department, Government of the Punjab (“Government”), under sections 3 and 11 of the Punjab Industries (Control on Establishment and Enlargement) Ordinance, 1963 (“Ordinance”), introducing amendments in Notification dated 17.09.2002 to the effect that establishment of new cement plants, and enlargement and expansion of existing cement plants shall not be allowed in the “Negative Area” falling within the Districts Chakwal and Khushab. 2. The petitioner owns and runs a cement manufacturing plant in Kahoon Valley in the Salt Range at Khairpur, District Chakwal and feels wronged of the Notification for the reasons, -
LAHORE-Ren98c.Pdf
Renewal List S/NO REN# / NAME FATHER'S NAME PRESENT ADDRESS DATE OF ACADEMIC REN DATE BIRTH QUALIFICATION 1 21233 MUHAMMAD M.YOUSAF H#56, ST#2, SIDIQUE COLONY RAVIROAD, 3/1/1960 MATRIC 10/07/2014 RAMZAN LAHORE, PUNJAB 2 26781 MUHAMMAD MUHAMMAD H/NO. 30, ST.NO. 6 MADNI ROAD MUSTAFA 10-1-1983 MATRIC 11/07/2014 ASHFAQ HAMZA IQBAL ABAD LAHORE , LAHORE, PUNJAB 3 29583 MUHAMMAD SHEIKH KHALID AL-SHEIKH GENERAL STORE GUNJ BUKHSH 26-7-1974 MATRIC 12/07/2014 NADEEM SHEIKH AHMAD PARK NEAR FUJI GAREYA STOP , LAHORE, PUNJAB 4 25380 ZULFIQAR ALI MUHAMMAD H/NO. 5-B ST, NO. 2 MADINA STREET MOH, 10-2-1957 FA 13/07/2014 HUSSAIN MUSLIM GUNJ KACHOO PURA CHAH MIRAN , LAHORE, PUNJAB 5 21277 GHULAM SARWAR MUHAMMAD YASIN H/NO.27,GALI NO.4,SINGH PURA 18/10/1954 F.A 13/07/2014 BAGHBANPURA., LAHORE, PUNJAB 6 36054 AISHA ABDUL ABDUL QUYYAM H/NO. 37 ST NO. 31 KOT KHAWAJA SAEED 19-12- BA 13/7/2014 QUYYAM FAZAL PURA LAHORE , LAHORE, PUNJAB 1979 7 21327 MUNAWAR MUHAMMAD LATIF HOWAL SHAFI LADIES CLINICNISHTER TOWN 11/8/1952 MATRIC 13/07/2014 SULTANA DROGH WALA, LAHORE, PUNJAB 8 29370 MUHAMMAD AMIN MUHAMMAD BILAL TAION BHADIA ROAD, LAHORE, PUNJAB 25-3-1966 MATRIC 13/07/2014 SADIQ 9 29077 MUHAMMAD MUHAMMAD ST. NO. 3 NAJAM PARK SHADI PURA BUND 9-8-1983 MATRIC 13/07/2014 ABBAS ATAREE TUFAIL QAREE ROAD LAHORE , LAHORE, PUNJAB 10 26461 MIRZA IJAZ BAIG MIRZA MEHMOOD PST COLONY Q 75-H MULTAN ROAD LHR , 22-2-1961 MA 13/07/2014 BAIG LAHORE, PUNJAB 11 32790 AMATUL JAMEEL ABDUL LATIF H/NO. -
PUNJAB, KPK, GILGIT Islamabad, AJK
1 PUNJAB, KPK, GILGIT ISlAMABAD, AJK S.No. Name & Address 1. Mr. Muhammad Adnan S/o Hafiz Muhammad Usman, House No. 10-A - Gulfisham Colony, Jhang Road Faisalabad 2. Hafiz Muhammad Zubair S/o Abdul Hameed H.No. 339, L-Block Shah Rukn E Alam Multan 3. Mr.Aftab Ahmad S/o Muhammad Yasin Model Town Near Faizan e MadinaMailsi District Vehari 4. Mr.Omer Farooq S/o Muhammad Mustaq H.No.39, St No.12, Block 10, New Multan 5. Mr.M.RashidIshaq S/o Muhammad Ishaq H.No.7, A Waseem Street Nazir Garden Harbanspura, Lahore 6. Syed M. Hammad Syed Shahid Ahmad House no.751,Ravi Block, Allama Iqbal Town, Lahore 54570 7. Mr.Asif Ali S/o Jam Zulfiqar Ali, P/o Garah Maharaja, Chah Ghazi wala Mouza Kapuri Tehsil Ahmad PurSialJhang 8. Mr.Ali Raza S/o M.Faheem W No.6, Khudadad Colony Sher Shah Colony Multan 9. Mr.Faisal Kamran S/o Khadum Hussain H.No. 1080/2, X.E.X Shahi Eid Gha Multan 10. Mr.M.Bilal, S/o M. Yaseen P-245, Green Town Millat Road, Faisalabad 11. Mr.M Faisal Hanif S/o M.Hanif House No.172,Umar Block Shadab Town, Sahiwal Punjab 12. Mr.Muhammad Arsalan H.No. Cat IV- 7 PAEC Colony, Sakhi Sarwar Road D.G Khan 13. Mr.M. Anus S/o Nasir Iqbal, H. No.01, St 86, G-13/1, Islamabad 14. Mr. M.Asif Iqbal S/o M. Iqbal C/o 2 Deputy Director Agriculture (OFWM )King Chowk Sohawa, District Mandi Bahaudin 15. -
World Bank Document
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized PUNJAB EDUCATION SECTOR REFORMS PROGRAM-II (PESRP-II) Public Disclosure Authorized PROGRAM DIRECTOR PUNJAB EDUCATION SECTOR REFORMS PROGRAM (PESRP) SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB Tel: +92 42 923 2289~95 Fax: +92 42 923 2290 url: http://pesrp.punjab.gov.pk email: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized Revised and Updated for PERSP-II February 2012 Public Disclosure Authorized DISCLAIMER This environmental and social assessment report of the activities of the Punjab Education Sector Reforms Program of the Government of the Punjab, which were considered to impact the environment, has been prepared in compliance to the Environmental laws of Pakistan and in conformity to the Operational Policy Guidelines of the World Bank. The report is Program specific and of limited liability and applicability only to the extent of the physical activities under the PESRP. All rights are reserved with the study proponent (the Program Director, PMIU, PESRP) and the environmental consultant (Environs, Lahore). No part of this report can be reproduced, copied, published, transcribed in any manner, or cited in a context different from the purpose for which it has been prepared, except with prior permission of the Program Director, PESRP. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document presents the environmental and social assessment report of the various activities under the Second Punjab Education Sector Reforms Program (PESRP-II) – an initiative of Government of the Punjab for continuing holistic reforms in the education sector aimed at improving the overall condition of education and the sector’s service delivery. -
APPOINTMENT and CONDITIONS of SERVICE) REGULATIONS, 2016 AIM: to Enforce the MDA (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Regulations 2016
DIRECTORATE OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ADMIN BRANCH AGENDA NO. 01 MDA (APPOINTMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATIONS, 2016 AIM: To enforce the MDA (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Regulations 2016. DETAILS/ EXISTING ARRANGEMENTS: 2. MDA (Appointments and Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1980 has remained enforced and are still under implementation since 1980. Over the period of 36 years, 68 meetings of Governing Body have been held and time to time various amendments have been made in the said Regulations and its schedule. If seen critically, the current schedule of Regulations is full of amendments, tailored promotion channels and abolished posts which were otherwise necessary for smooth functioning of MDA. 3. Across the board, it has been observed that promotion criteria for various posts have been shifted from seniority-cum-fitness basis to mandatory trainings and departmental training examination. Recently the instructions of Government of the Punjab for ensuring merit based promotions basing on mandatory training/promotion exam has been received, which is also being placed for adoption by MDA. The same has also been proposed for almost all the posts whether technical or general cadre so that merit based promotions may be ensured. 4. The regulations include two parts namely appointment and the condition of service for MDA employees and its Schedule. Extensive efforts have been put in for making this schedule practicable. An effort has been made that no post may remain stagnant and mostly post has been given promotion prospects. The same did not exist in the current Schedule. There were many discrepancies as already mentioned above which have also been rectified. -
List of Category -I Members Registered in Membership Drive-Ii
LIST OF CATEGORY -I MEMBERS REGISTERED IN MEMBERSHIP DRIVE-II MEMBERSHIP CGN QUOTA CATEGORY NAME DOB BPS CNIC DESIGNATION PARENT OFFICE DATE MR. DAUD AHMAD OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 36772 AUTONOMOUS I 25-May-15 BUTT 01-Apr-56 20 3520279770503 MANAGER LIMITD MR. MUHAMMAD 38295 AUTONOMOUS I 26-Feb-16 SAGHIR 01-Apr-56 20 6110156993503 MANAGER SOP OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT CO LTD MR. MALIK 30647 AUTONOMOUS I 22-Jan-16 MUHAMMAD RAEES 01-Apr-57 20 3740518930267 DEPUTY CHIEF MANAGER DESTO DY CHEIF ENGINEER CO- PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY 7543 AUTONOMOUS I 17-Apr-15 MR. SHAUKAT ALI 01-Apr-57 20 6110119081647 ORDINATOR COMMISSION 37349 AUTONOMOUS I 29-Jan-16 MR. ZAFAR IQBAL 01-Apr-58 20 3520222355873 ADD DIREC GENERAL WAPDA MR. MUHAMMA JAVED PAKISTAN BORDCASTING CORPORATION 88713 AUTONOMOUS I 14-Apr-17 KHAN JADOON 01-Apr-59 20 611011917875 CONTRALLER NCAC ISLAMABAD MR. SAIF UR REHMAN 3032 AUTONOMOUS I 07-Jul-15 KHAN 01-Apr-59 20 6110170172167 DIRECTOR GENRAL OVERS PAKISTAN FOUNDATION MR. MUHAMMAD 83637 AUTONOMOUS I 13-May-16 MASOOD UL HASAN 01-Apr-59 20 6110163877113 CHIEF SCIENTIST PROFESSOR PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISION 60681 AUTONOMOUS I 08-Jun-15 MR. LIAQAT ALI DOLLA 01-Apr-59 20 3520225951143 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SECURITY EXCHENGE COMMISSION MR. MUHAMMAD CHIEF ENGINEER / PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY 41706 AUTONOMOUS I 01-Feb-16 LATIF 01-Apr-59 21 6110120193443 DERECTOR TRAINING COMMISSION MR. MUHAMMAD 43584 AUTONOMOUS I 16-Jun-15 JAVED 01-Apr-59 20 3820112585605 DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER PAEC WASO MR. SAGHIR UL 36453 AUTONOMOUS I 23-May-15 HASSAN KHAN 01-Apr-59 21 3520227479165 SENOR GENERAL MANAGER M/O PETROLEUM ISLAMABAD MR. -
Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, J
Stereo. H C J D A 38. Judgment Sheet IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Case No: W.P. 5406/2011 Syed Riaz Ali Zaidi Versus Government of the Punjab, etc. JUDGMENT Dates of hearing: 20.01.2015, 21.01.2015, 09.02.2015 and 10.02.2015 Petitioner by: Mian Bilal Bashir assisted by Raja Tasawer Iqbal, Advocates for the petitioner. Respondents by: Mian Tariq Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan. Mr. Muhammad Hanif Khatana, Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Anwaar Hussain, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Tariq Mirza, Deputy Secretary, Finance Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore. Nadeem Riaz Malik, Section Officer, Finance Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore. Amici Curiae: M/s Tanvir Ali Agha, former Auditor General of Pakistan and Waqqas Ahmad Mir, Advocate. Assisted by: M/s. Qaisar Abbas and Mohsin Mumtaz, Civil Judges/Research Officers, Lahore High Court Research Centre (LHCRC). “The judiciary should not be left in a position of seeking financial and administrative sanctions for either the provision of infrastructure, staff and facilities for the judges from the Executive and the State, which happens W.P. No.5406/2011 2 to be one of the largest litigants….autonomy is required for an independent and vibrant judiciary, to strengthen and improve the justice delivery system, for enforcing the rule of law1.” Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, J:- This case explores the constitutionalism of financial autonomy and budgetary independence of the superior judiciary on the touchstone of the ageless constitutional values of independence of judiciary and separation of powers. 2. Additional Registrar of this High Court has knocked at the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, raising the question of non-compliance of the executive authority of the Federation by the Provincial Government, as the direction of the Prime Minister to the Provincial Government to enhance the allowances of the staff of the superior judiciary goes unheeded. -
Lahore High Court Lahore
Stereo. H C J D A 38. Judgment Sheet IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Case No: W. P. No.115949/2017 Maple Leaf Cement Factory Versus Environmental Protection Ltd. Agency, etc. JUDGMENT Date of hearing: 21.12.2017 Petitioner by: M/s. Mansoor Usman Awan, Shazeen Abdullah and Hussain Ibrahim, Advocates. Respondent (s) M/s Asma Hamid and Anwaar Hussain, by: Additional Advocates General, Punjab. Mr. Arshad Mehmood, Secretary, Mines and Mineral, Government of the Punjab. Mr. Zafar Javaid, Director, Mines and Mineral, Government of the Punjab. Mr. Muhammad Javaid, Superintendent, Mines and Mineral, Government of the Punjab. Mian Ejaz Majeed, Deputy Director (L&E), EPA. Mr. Asim Rehman, Deputy Director (EIA), EPA. The fate of the Creation is the fate of the humanity. - E.O.Wilson1 Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, C.J:- Facts: Brief facts, as argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner, are that the cement plant of the petitioner was set up in the year 1956 by the West Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation with the 1 The Creation - An appeal to save life on Earth – by E.O.Wilson P.14 W.P. No.115949/2017 2 production capacity of 3000 tonnes per annum. The cement plant was privatized in the year 1992 when the petitioner company purchased the same. The production capacity of the plant at that time of the purchase of the plant by the petitioner was 4000 tonnes per annum. Later on the production capacity of the cement plant was enhanced by the petitioner and Line-II of the plant was added in the year 2007 with an additional production capacity of 7,000 tonnes per annum. -
The Pakistani Lawyers' Movement and the Popular
NOTES THE PAKISTANI LAWYERS’ MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR CURRENCY OF JUDICIAL POWER “I support the lawyers,” said the Pakistani farmer on the train from Lahore, “because if Musharraf can do whatever he wants to this man, the Chief Justice of Pakistan, then none of us is safe.”1 It was the summer of 2008, and for several months Pakistani lawyers had been leading protests seeking the restoration to office of sixty-plus superior court judges,2 including Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, who had been suspended by President Pervez Musharraf.3 The farm- er’s response to questions about his thoughts on the protests was typi- cal of Pakistanis at the time in its clear-headed articulation of the symbolic importance of the lawyers’ struggle and in its implicit under- standing of the central function of an independent judiciary. Indeed, the Chief Justice was the closest to a personal embodiment of “the law” that one could find in Pakistan. If even he served at the pleasure of a dictator — so the story went —the capacity of the law to constrain this dictator and protect ordinary Pakistanis was perilously weak. In March 2007, Chaudhry refused the urging of five generals to re- sign and was removed by Musharraf. Two years later, with Musharraf in exile and a civilian government in power, nationwide protests re- turned Chaudhry to his position atop the nation’s highest court.4 Af- ter twenty-four months of struggle, the lawyers’ movement thus ended with an improbable victory. Moreover, in a nation where the courts historically have followed the dictates of the military and allowed for the repeated subversion of the country’s constitutions,5 the restoration ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 Interview with Pakistani farmer, on train from Lahore, Pak. -
Annual Report 2015–2016
SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 Supreme Court of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 Supreme Court of Pakistan Constitution Avenue, Islamabad Ph: 051-9220581-600 Fa x: 051-9215306 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.supremecourt.gov.pk Branch Registry Lahore Nabha Road. Ph: 042-99212401-4 Fax: 042-99212406 Branch Registry Karachi MR Kiyani Road. Ph: 021-99212306-8 Fax: 021-99212305 Branch Registry Peshawar Khyber Road. Ph: 091-9213601-5 Fax: 091-9213599 Branch Registry Quetta High Court of Balochistan Building Quetta. Ph: 081-9201365 Fax: 081-9202244 Published by: Supreme Court of Pakistan Compiled & edited by: Khawaja Daud Ahmad, Additional Registrar (Administration) Saleem Ahmad, Librarian, Supreme Court of Pakistan ii Supreme Court of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 CONTENTS 1. Foreword by the Chief Justice of Pakistan 1 2. Registrar’s Report 2 3. Profile of the Chief Justice and Judges 5 3.1 Profile of the Chief Justice of Pakistan 6 3.2 Profile of Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan 7 3.3 Chief Justices & Judges Retired During June 2015 to 34 May 2016 4. Supreme Court of Pakistan 35 4.1 Introduction 36 4.2 Seat of Supreme Court 37 4.3 Branch Registries 37 4.4 Supreme Court Composition, June 2015 to May 2016 39 4.5 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 40 4.6 Procedure for the Appointment of Judges of the 42 Supreme Court of Pakistan 4.7 Judicial Commission of Pakistan 43 4.8 Composition of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan 45 4.9 Judicial Commission of Pakistan Rules, 2010 45 4.10 Oath of Office 46 4.11 The Supreme Judicial Council of Pakistan 47 4.12 Code of Conduct for Judges of the Supreme Court and 48 the High Courts 4.13 The Supreme Judicial Council Procedure of Inquiry, 50 2005 4.14 Supreme Judicial Council – Reference No. -
Judicial Statistics of Pakistan 2002
Judicial Statistics of Pakistan 2002 Annual Reports of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court & the Provincial High Courts NATIONAL JUDICIAL POLICY MAKING COMMITTEE c 2003 National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee This Annual Report is published by the Secretariat of the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan This report can be viewed at the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan website http://www.ljcp.com.pk. Comments and sugges- tions may be sent to the Secretariat of the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad. Tel: 051-9220483 Fax: 051-9214416 email: [email protected]. Contents 1 FOREWORD 1 2 SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 5 2.1 Foreword by the Chief Justice of Pakistan ....................... 5 2.2 Judicial Statistics ..................................... 7 2.2.1 Court Performance During the Year 2002 .................... 7 2.2.2 Distribution of Work: The Principal Seat of the Court and Branch Registries 8 Statatement of Court Sessions, 2002 at Principal Seat, Islamabad ...... 8 Branch Registry, Lahore ............................. 10 Branch Registry, Karachi ............................. 11 Branch Registry, Peshawar ............................ 11 Branch Registry, Quetta ............................. 11 2.2.3 Statistics on the Institution and Disposition of Cases During the Year 2002 .12 2.2.4 Some Visible Trends ............................... 22 Analysis of the Pending Balance ......................... 27 Pending Balance According to Age of Cases as on 31-12-2002 ......... 29 Data for the Last Five Decades: Increase in Institution of Cases as Compared to Increase in the Number of Judges ................. 30 2.3 Budgetary Statistics ................................... 35 2.3.1 Expenditure During the Last Financial Year 2001–2002 ............ 35 2.3.2 Budgetary Allocation for the Year 2002–2003 ................