DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2015–2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 Supreme Court of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 Supreme Court of Pakistan Constitution Avenue, Islamabad Ph: 051-9220581-600 Fa x: 051-9215306 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.supremecourt.gov.pk Branch Registry Lahore Nabha Road. Ph: 042-99212401-4 Fax: 042-99212406 Branch Registry Karachi MR Kiyani Road. Ph: 021-99212306-8 Fax: 021-99212305 Branch Registry Peshawar Khyber Road. Ph: 091-9213601-5 Fax: 091-9213599 Branch Registry Quetta High Court of Balochistan Building Quetta. Ph: 081-9201365 Fax: 081-9202244 Published by: Supreme Court of Pakistan Compiled & edited by: Khawaja Daud Ahmad, Additional Registrar (Administration) Saleem Ahmad, Librarian, Supreme Court of Pakistan ii Supreme Court of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 CONTENTS 1. Foreword by the Chief Justice of Pakistan 1 2. Registrar’s Report 2 3. Profile of the Chief Justice and Judges 5 3.1 Profile of the Chief Justice of Pakistan 6 3.2 Profile of Judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan 7 3.3 Chief Justices & Judges Retired During June 2015 to 34 May 2016 4. Supreme Court of Pakistan 35 4.1 Introduction 36 4.2 Seat of Supreme Court 37 4.3 Branch Registries 37 4.4 Supreme Court Composition, June 2015 to May 2016 39 4.5 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 40 4.6 Procedure for the Appointment of Judges of the 42 Supreme Court of Pakistan 4.7 Judicial Commission of Pakistan 43 4.8 Composition of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan 45 4.9 Judicial Commission of Pakistan Rules, 2010 45 4.10 Oath of Office 46 4.11 The Supreme Judicial Council of Pakistan 47 4.12 Code of Conduct for Judges of the Supreme Court and 48 the High Courts 4.13 The Supreme Judicial Council Procedure of Inquiry, 50 2005 4.14 Supreme Judicial Council – Reference No. 205 and 215- 53 SJC of 2014 4.15 Role and Functions of the Chief Justice 53 5. Court Performance 55 5.1 Overview of Judicial Activities 56 5.2 Statement of Court Sessions from June 2015 to May 57 2016 5.3 Institution and Disposal of Cases from June 2015 to 62 May 2016 5.4 Pendency of cases 65 5.5 Institution and Disposal of Petitions & Appeals 65 5.6 Consolidated Statement of Cases 67 6. Statistical Data Analysis 69 6.1 Trend in Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases 70 from 2001 to 2015 6.2 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Appeals in the 74 Supreme Court of Pakistan from 1950 to December, 2015 6.3 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Petitions in the 76 Supreme Court of Pakistan from 1950 to December, 2015 iv Supreme Court of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 CONTENTS 6.4 Institution of Petitions and Appeals over the last six 78 decades 7. Human Rights Cell 79 7.1 Human Rights Cell 80 7.2 Institution, Disposal and Balance of Cases from June 81 2015 to May 2016 7.3 Expatriate Pakistanis’ Wing Institution & Disposal of 83 Cases from June 2015 to May 2016 7.4 Important Cases Decided by HRC 85 7.4.1 HRC No 10153-S/2015 85 7.4.2 HRC No. 16115-S/2015 85 7.4.3 HRC No.24409-S/2015 85 7.4.4 HRC No. 2389-S/2016 85 7.4.5 HRC No.21300-P/2015 85 7.4.6 HRC No 6641-E/2016 85 7.4.7 HRC No. 4008-P/2015 86 7.4.8 HRC No 19306-S/2015 86 7.4.9 HRC 22698-P/2015 86 7.4.10 HRC No 15019-P/2015 86 7.4.11 HRC NO. 26903-S/2015 86 7.4.12 HRC 10687-E/2014 86 7.4.13 HRC 13234-E/2014 86 7.4.14 HRC No. 18406-P/2014 87 7.4.15 HRC No. 25834-P/2014 87 7.4.16 HRC 5765-S/2016 87 8. Important Cases Decided by the Supreme Court 89 8.1 The State through Director Anti Narcotics Force, 90 Peshawar v. Rashm Ali Khan 8.2 Ali Muhammad and others v. Syed Bibi and others 91 8.3 Kareem Nawaz Khan v. The State 92 8.4 Federation of Pakistan v. Durrani Ceramics 93 8.5 District Bar Association, Rawalpindi v. Federation of 94 Pakistan 8.6 Lahore Development Authority v. Ms. Imrana Tiwana 96 8.7 Mumtaz Qadri v. The State 97 8.8 Dr. Zahid Javed v. Dr. Tahir Riaz Chaudhry 98 8.9 Muhammad Ashraf Baig v. NESCOM 100 8.10 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and 8 others 101 v. Syed Kabir Bokhari 9. The Court and It’s Registries 103 9.1 Introduction 104 9.2 The Principal Seat at Islamabad 105 9.3 Branch Registry at Lahore 109 9.4 Branch Registry at Karachi 111 Supreme Court of Pakistan v ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 CONTENTS 9.5 Branch Registry at Peshawar 113 9.6 Information Technology Section 114 9.7 Record Weeding Section 114 9.8 Court Museum 115 9.9 Court Library 120 9.10 Allocated Budget & Expenditure of the Court. 122 9.11 Staff Welfare Fund 125 9.12 Beneficiaries of Al-Mizan oundationF Fund 126 9.13 Beneficiaries of Begum Qurrat-ul-Ain Ramday Welfare 126 Trust 9.14 Organizational Chart of the Court 127 10. Pictorial Presentation of Events 129 11. Activities of the Chief Justice of Pakistan and Judges 159 11.1 Federal Judicial Academy 160 11.2 Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan 162 11.3 Foreign Tours of the Chief Justice and Judges 167 11.4 Activities of the Chief Justice and Judges in the 168 Principal Seat and Branch Registries 11.5 Judges of the Supreme Court Nominated to Various 170 Committees, Tribunals and Academic Bodies 12. Supreme Court of Pakistan and the Media 171 13. Information on the Administration of Justice 207 13.1 Present Composition of the Federal Shariat Court and 208 High Courts 13.2 Sanctioned Strength of Judges in Subordinate Judiciary 211 13.3 Strength of Law Officers at the Office of Attorney 211 General for Pakistan 13.4 Strength of Law Officers at the Office of Advocate 212 Generals 13.5 Strength of Law Officers at the Office of Prosecutor 212 General / Director General (Prosecution) 13.6 Advocates on the Rolls of the Supreme Court 213 13.7 Strength of Advocates Enrolled with the Bar Councils 213 13.8 Affiliated Law Colleges with Universities 214 13.9 Judicial Hierarchy 217 14. Former Chief Justices, Judges and Registrars 219 14.1 Former Chief Justices of Pakistan 220 14.2 Former Judges of the Supreme Court 221 14.3 Former Registrars of the Supreme Court 224 vi Supreme Court of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 Justice for All Judicial Anthem The toil, the sweat, the tears and the blood, Make up the labor for the land begot. The freedom is won, but the chains are clung, There are miles to cover, The voyage is tough and the weather is rough, The odyssey begins; The Founder declares his vision Of Democracy, Faith, Tolerance and Compassion. Discriminate the State shall not Thou may belong to any religion, creed or caste. Oh! The vision is distorted, the march is thwarted, Castles in the sand, babes in the woods, Recipes of fall abound in the books. The nation is cut, the land is bled When the message is lost, a die is cast, The wages are loud, Beware of the clouds. Long live the message, the Lamp and the rays That glow The Temple, which holds the scales, Pinning the dreams, the hopes and the oath Of Justice for All By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, Former Chief Justice of Pakistan Supreme Court of Pakistan vii Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali Chief Justice of Pakistan ANNUAL REPORT June 2015 - May 2016 Foreword by the Chief Justice of Pakistan (In the name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful) The publication of Annual Report by now is a number of Judges remained busy in conducting regular feature of the working of this Court. The proceedings of the Inquiry Commissions constituted Report furnishes essential information about the by the Government to resolve issues of great composition, jurisdiction, functioning of the Court national importance, in the meetings of the Judicial and its offices; mode of appointment of Judges and Commission for appointment of Judges as well as important decisions pronounced during the period in the proceedings of the Supreme Judicial Council under report, etc. It also exhibits the performance pertaining to complaints filed against the Judges of of the Court, through the statistical data, in a simple the Superior Courts. yet comprehensive manner and highlights the achievements made in the course of its working. During the period under report, two Hon’ble Chief Justices – Mr. Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk and Mr. Justice Almost every court system in any modern State is Jawwad S. Khawaja – laid down the robes on attaining confronted with the issue of heavy backlog of cases. the age of superannuation. Two of the Hon’ble Ours is no exception. It is a chronic problem, which Judges, namely, Mr. Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmani and continues to haunt the system of administration of Mr. Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry also laid down the justice. The issue is aggravated by an ever increasing robes. All of us greatly appreciate their legal acumen litigation. This calls for a concerted effort on the and the great services rendered by them to the cause part of all the stakeholders – the Judges, lawyers, of justice and the constitutionalism.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2000

    Annual Report 2000

    Mohtasib (Ombudsman)’s ANNUAL REPORT 2000 WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN)’S SECRETARIAT ISLAMABAD – PAKISTAN Tele: (92)-(51)-9201665–8, Fax: 9210487, Telex: 5593 WMS PK E-mail: [email protected] A Profile of the Ombudsman Mr. Justice Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, the Senior Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan was administered oath of the Office of Acting Ombudsman of Pakistan by the President of the Islamic Republic of Paki- stan at Aiwan-e-Sadr (President’s House), Islamabad on 10th February, 2000. Mr. Justice Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri has rich experience in the legal profession and the judiciary, acquired over a period of about 38 years. His Lordship was born on 1st February, 1937 at Mansehra, NWFP. He received his school education in Lahore, obtaining distinctions and did B.A. (First-Class-First) from Abbottabad in 1960. He obtained his LL.B degree from the University Law College, Peshawar in 1962 and joined the Bar in February, 1963. After qualifying the West Pakistan P.C.S. (Judicial Branch) Exami- nation, he was appointed as Civil Judge on 7th March, 1966. After serving at various stations as Civil Judge and Senior Civil Judge, he was promoted as Additional District and Sessions Judge on 6th July, 1974 and as District and Sessions Judge on 24th October, 1974. His Lordship served as Judicial Commissioner, Northern Areas, from June, 1979 to December, 1982. He remained Special Judge, Customs, Taxation and Anti-smuggling (Central), Peshawar from March, 1983 to September, 1984. He took-over the charge as Joint Secretary, Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs (Justice Division), Islamabad on iii 12.9.1984.
  • Election Management and Party Decision Making in Pakistan1

    Election Management and Party Decision Making in Pakistan1

    ELECTION MANAGEMENT AND PARTY DECISION MAKING IN PAKISTAN1 Sameen A. Mohsin Ali (SOAS) Work in Progress – Please do not cite ABSTRACT This paper argues that while the election was definitely a step in the right direction, a great deal needs to be done before democratic consolidation takes place in Pakistan. I argue that electoral mismanagement; the powerlessness of the ECP; and, the intervention of an activist Supreme Court in the run up to the election shaped how parties made candidate selection decisions, and in turn, impacted the voters‘ choices. In order to highlight these issues with the electoral process, I will discuss (1) the structure and staffing of the ECP, linking the notion of bureaucratic agency to malpractices within the Commission; and (2) the powerlessness of the ECP in light of 4 issues that were relevant in the run up to 11 May 2013, leaving a gap for the Supreme Court to fill. This is not a normative argument; instead, this paper present a picture of how the actors involved in the electoral process are interlinked, influencing each other‘s decisions and behaviour, leaving loopholes for other actors to fill. It indicates how these interactions might impact the electoral process in Pakistan, and suggests that further research on the issue may yield observations of interest. INTRODUCTION Following the May 2013 election, there have been numerous accusations of misconduct, mismanagement, and rigging. With some of these accusations, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has dealt promptly and well, for example, re-polling at polling stations in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa where women were barred from voting.
  • Reforming the Judiciary in Pakistan

    Reforming the Judiciary in Pakistan

    REFORMING THE JUDICIARY IN PAKISTAN Asia Report N°160 – 16 October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND................................................................................................................ 3 A. ISLAMISING THE POLITY ..............................................................................................................3 B. VALIDATING MILITARY INTERVENTIONS .....................................................................................3 C. DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AND JUDICIAL REFORM......................................................................5 III. ISLAMISING THE LEGAL SYSTEM: INSTITUTIONALISED DISCRIMINATION.......................................................................................................... 6 A. THE BLASPHEMY LAW.................................................................................................................6 B. TARGETING AHMADIS..................................................................................................................8 C. WOMEN AND THE HUDOOD ORDINANCES ..................................................................................10 D. THE FEDERAL SHARIAT COURT .................................................................................................11 IV. RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW ...........................................................................
  • Building Judicial Independence in Pakistan

    Building Judicial Independence in Pakistan

    BUILDING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN PAKISTAN 10 November 2004 Asia Report N°86 Islamabad/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE STRUCTURE AND HISTORY OF PAKISTAN'S JUDICIARY.................... 2 A. THE STRUCTURE OF PAKISTAN'S JUDICIARY ............................................................................2 B. COURTS AND POLITICS: PRE-1999 ENTANGLEMENTS.........................................................3 C. THE SUPREME COURT AND THE 12 OCTOBER 1999 COUP ..................................................5 III. JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS ............................................... 6 A. THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK.....................................................................................6 B. APPOINTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS IN PRACTICE..................................................................8 C. REFORMING THE APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION OF JUDGES ...........................................11 IV. THE REMOVAL OF JUDGES................................................................................... 12 A. MEANS OF REMOVING JUDGES............................................................................................12 B. REFORMING REMOVALS AND STEMMING CORRUPTION.......................................................13 C. "ADDITIONAL" HIGH COURT JUDGES ..................................................................................14
  • Pakistan Was Suspended by President General Musharaff in March Last Year Leading to a Worldwide Uproar Against This Act

    Pakistan Was Suspended by President General Musharaff in March Last Year Leading to a Worldwide Uproar Against This Act

    A Coup against Judicial Independence . Special issue of the CJEI Report (February, 2008) ustice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, the twentieth Chief Justice of Pakistan was suspended by President General Musharaff in March last year leading to a worldwide uproar against this act. However, by a landmark order J handed down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Justice Chaudhry was reinstated. We at the CJEI were delighted and hoped that this would put an end to the ugly confrontation between the judiciary and the executive. However our happiness was short lived. On November 3, 2007, President General Musharaff suspended the constitution and declared a state of emergency. Soon the Pakistan army entered the Supreme Court premises removing Justice Chaudhry and other judges. The Constitution was also suspended and was replaced with a “Provisional Constitutional Order” enabling the Executive to sack Chief Justice Chaudhry, and other judges who refused to swear allegiance to this extra­constitutional order. Ever since then, the judiciary in Pakistan has been plunged into turmoil and Justice Chaudhry along with dozens of other Justices has been held incommunicado in their homes. Any onslaught on judicial independence is a matter of grave concern to all more so to the legal and judicial fraternity in countries that are wedded to the rule of law. In the absence of an independent judiciary, human rights and constitutional guarantees become meaningless; the situation capable of jeopardising even the long term developmental goals of a country. As observed by Viscount Bryce, “If the lamp of justice goes out in darkness, how great is the darkness.” This is really true of Pakistan which is presently going through testing times.
  • P L D 2007 Supreme Court 202 [Shariat Appellate Jurisdiction

    P L D 2007 Supreme Court 202 [Shariat Appellate Jurisdiction

    P L D 2007 Supreme Court 202 [Shariat Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Abdul Hameed Dogar, Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, Mian Shakirullah Jan, Dr. Allama Khalid Mahmood and Dr. Rashid Ahmed Jullundhari, JJ NAZEER alias WAZEER---Appellant Versus THE STATE---Respondent Criminal Appeal No.53(S) of 2001, decided on 18th October, 2006. (On appeal from the judgment of Federal Shariat Court, dated 8-2-2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No.128/I of 2000 with M.R.41/I of 2000). (a) Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)--- ----S.10(3)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302(b) & 201---Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), S.12---Oaths Act (X of 1873), S.5---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 203- F(2-B)---Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider; whether Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 was applicable to the case; whether judicial confession made on oath could be used against the accused for sustaining death sentence; and whether such confession made on oath was admissible in evidence and could have been acted upon. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- --Ss. 164 & 364---Oaths Act (X of 1873), S.5---Judicial confession---Administering of oath to accused---Scope---Contention that confessional statement recorded on oath, if causes no prejudice or injustice to accused is admissible in evidence---Validity---Provisions of Ss.164 and 364, Cr.P.C. invariably apply to all sorts of statements---Confessional statement recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C. on oath is violative of S.5 of Oaths Act, 1873, which prohibits
  • PLD 2001 Supreme Court 607

    PLD 2001 Supreme Court 607

    PLD 2001 Supreme Court 607 Present: Irshad Hasan Khan, CJ. Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, Ch. Muhammad Arif and Qazi Muhammad Farooq, JJ KHAN ASFANDYAR WALI and others---Petitioners versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Division, Islamabad and others--- Respondents Constitutional Petitions Nos. 13, 10, 27, 15, 16, 17, 28, 24, 26, O1, 14,19, 20, 32 and 33 of 2000 decided on 24th April, 2001. (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--- ----Art.184(3)---National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Preamble--- Constitutional petition under. Art.184(3) of the Constitution before Supreme Court--- Maintainability ---Vires of National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999--- Constitutional petitions were admitted for hearing as questions raised therein ,(detailed below) were matters of first impression and of great public importance involving Fundamental Rights, as ordained by Art.184(3 , of the Constitution and there was another circumstance that Supreme Court had commented upon in the case of S Yed Zafar Ali Shah and others v General Pervez Mussharaf, Chief Executive of Pakistan and others reported as PLB 2000 SC 869 that "the validity of National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 will be examined separately in appropriate proceedings at appropriate stage." Following are the common points emerging from the Constitutional petitions for consideration of the Court: "(i) Whether the impugned Ordinance creates a parallel judicial system in disregard of the provisions of Articles 175, 202 and 203 of the Constitution and is violative of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Mehram Ali and others v. Federation and others (PLD 1998 SC 1445)? (ii) Whether section 2 of the impugned Ordinance whereby it deems to have come into force with effect from 1-1-1985 being retrospective contravenes the Fundamental .Right enshrined in _ Article 12 of the Constitution insofar as it creates a new offence of 'wilful default' with retrospective effect? (iii) Whether section 5(r) of the impugned Ordinance which defines `wilful default' negates the.
  • Mr.Justice Salahuddin Mirza ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION

    Mr.Justice Salahuddin Mirza ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION

    Mr.Justice Salahuddin Mirza 08.01.2007 to 07.01.2010 ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION • Matriculation in 1950 from Sindh University (B.V.S. Parsi High School, Karachi). • Intermediate and B.A. from Sindh Muslim College Karachi in 1954. • L.L.B from Sindh Muslim Law College in 1958. • Appeared in the P.C.S. (Judicial Branch) examination of the West Pakistan Public Service Commission in 1959 and qualified the same, standing first in English language. EXPERIENCE • On appointment, his services were placed at the disposal of Lahore Bench of West Pakistan High Court. • First posting at Multan in 1960. Further postings in Lahore, Pakpattan and again in Lahore and Dera Ghazi Khan. • On the break-up of one Unit in 1970, the all West Pakistan Services were bifurcated on the basis of domicile and, since his domicile was of Karachi. • He was repatriated to Sindh and posted in Thatta as Civil Judge and FCM. • Promoted as Additional District & Sessions Judge and posted in Karachi from 1972 to 1974 and at Larkana from 1975 to 1976. • Served as Judge of the Labour Court Sukkur (1977-79) and Judge of Labour Court at Karachi (1979 to 1981). • Promoted as District and Sessions Judge in 1980. • Served in the Law Division, Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad, as Deputy Solicitor/Joint Secretary from February 1981 to March, 1985. • On completion of deputation in the Law Division was posted at Karachi as Chairman Appellate Tribunal (Local Councils) where he served from April, 1985, to April,1988. • Served as the Registrar of the Sindh High Court from April 1988 to September, 1988, when elevated to the High Court.
  • Judgesʼ Library Monthly Newsletter

    Judgesʼ Library Monthly Newsletter

    JUDGES’ LIBRARY MONTHLY NEWSLETTER Vol: 2 Issue: 1 January, 2014 LIST OF BOOKS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY, A JUDGE SPEAKS OUT 2014 AJMAL MIAN OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, THE GOLDEN WARRIOR 2004 (THREE COPIES) LAWRENCE JAMES Oxford University Press, New Delhi, ABACUS, 2005` (ONE COPY) 2004. Hardbound. Book Condition: As During the 1920s—in the aftermath of New. New. Contents Preface. 1. The the Arab revolt against Britain—T. E. early years. 2. England. 3. The legal Lawrence gained global attention, both profession. 4. The High Court of Sindh. for his involvement in the Middle Eastern 5. Acting chief justice high court of anti-imperialist movement, and for his Balochistan. 6. Transfer back to the vivid and sensational writings about his high court of Sindh. 7. The chief justice experiences. Following World War I, his high court of Sindh. 8. Elevation to the appointment as an advisor to Winston Supreme Court of Pakistan. 9. Being Churchill—nearly simultaneous with the superseded. 10. The Judges case. 11. release of an American documentary President's reference no. 2. 12. Judicial about the revolt—further charged the T. crises. 13. The chief justice of Pakistan. E. Lawrence mania. Despite the 14. Final thoughts. Appendices. Notes. emergence of a whole new set of Glossary. Index. A Judge Speaks Out problems in the Middle East, and fueled provides some interesting anecdotes by the classic status of the epic movie and poignant moments from his life Lawrence of Arabia, the T. E. Lawrence his youth his migration at partition mystique continues to fascinate. from Delhi to Karachi in 1947 and the Controversial and provocative, this acclimatization of his family there to revised and updated edition of Lawrence his subsequent entry into the legal James’s acclaimed biography penetrates profession in 1957.
  • Makers-Of-Modern-Sindh-Feb-2020

    Makers-Of-Modern-Sindh-Feb-2020

    Sindh Madressah’s Roll of Honor MAKERS OF MODERN SINDH Lives of 25 Luminaries Sindh Madressah’s Roll of Honor MAKERS OF MODERN SINDH Lives of 25 Luminaries Dr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh SMIU Press Karachi Alma-Mater of Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Karachi Aiwan-e-Tijarat Road, Karachi-74000 Pakistan. This book under title Sindh Madressah’s Roll of Honour MAKERS OF MODERN SINDH Lives of 25 Luminaries Written by Professor Dr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh 1st Edition, Published under title Luminaries of the Land in November 1999 Present expanded edition, Published in March 2020 By Sindh Madressatul Islam University Price Rs. 1000/- SMIU Press Karachi Copyright with the author Published by SMIU Press, Karachi Aiwan-e-Tijarat Road, Karachi-74000, Pakistan All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any from or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer, who may quote brief passage in a review Dedicated to loving memory of my parents Preface ‘It is said that Sindh produces two things – men and sands – great men and sandy deserts.’ These words were voiced at the floor of the Bombay’s Legislative Council in March 1936 by Sir Rafiuddin Ahmed, while bidding farewell to his colleagues from Sindh, who had won autonomy for their province and were to go back there. The four names of great men from Sindh that he gave, included three former students of Sindh Madressah. Today, in 21st century, it gives pleasure that Sindh Madressah has kept alive that tradition of producing great men to serve the humanity.
  • Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts

    Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts

    Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts Shahnaz Begum Laghari PhD University of York Women’s Studies March 2016 Abstract The aim of this project is to investigate the phenomenon of honour-related violence, the most extreme form of which is honour killing. The research was conducted in Sindh (one of the four provinces of Pakistan). The main research question is, ‘Are these killings for honour?’ This study was inspired by a need to investigate whether the practice of honour killing in Sindh is still guided by the norm of honour or whether other elements have come to the fore. It is comprised of the experiences of those involved in honour killings through informal, semi- structured, open-ended, in-depth interviews, conducted under the framework of the qualitative method. The aim of my thesis is to apply a feminist perspective in interpreting the data to explore the tradition of honour killing and to let the versions of the affected people be heard. In my research, the women who are accused as karis, having very little redress, are uncertain about their lives; they speak and reveal the motives behind the allegations and killings in the name of honour. The male killers, whom I met inside and outside the jails, justify their act of killing in the name of honour, culture, tradition and religion. Drawing upon interviews with thirteen women and thirteen men, I explore and interpret the data to reveal their childhood, educational, financial and social conditions and the impacts of these on their lives, thoughts and actions.
  • 2004 SCMR 1824.Pdf

    2004 SCMR 1824.Pdf

    TaxHelpline Case No. 153 of 2004 Supreme Court of Pakistan Cr. Petitions Nos.21 and 22/K of 2003, heard on 13th April, 2004 Present: Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J., Javed Iqbal and Abdul Hameed Dogar, JJ Akhlaq Ahmed Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for the Petitioner. M. Ilyas Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ms. Wajahat Niaz, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau---Petitioner Vs Agha WAZIR ABBAS and another---Respondents ORDER NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, C J.-----The Stale through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau (NAB), petitioner (in both petitions) has impugned the judgment, dated 8- 2-2003 of a learned Division Bench, High Court of Sindh, Karachi, whereby Criminal Accountability Appeals Nos.31 and 32 of 2002 were allowed and the respondents in both petitions were acquitted of the Reference filed against them, under section 10 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 and the sentences of seven years' R.I. and fine of Rs.25,00,000 each or in default thereof three years' S.I. and disqualification for a period of ten years from holding any representative office/office in the service of Pakistan, were set aside and they were ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. 2. The prosecution case against respondent Agha Wazir Abbas, an Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer in the Excise Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi and respondent Abdul Hameed, Manager of Messrs Standard Wine Company (Pvt.) Ltd. was that they along with the absconding accused, namely, Riaz Hassan Khoso, Abdul Razzak Abbasi, Asif Ikhlaq Ahmed and Saleh Muhammad Rahu were guilty of forging import and transport permits, evasion of vend fee and fee of cess charged on transport permits for the disposal of liquor, thereby caused loss of Rs.38,287,290 to the public exchequer.