DOCSLIB.ORG

Reforming the Judiciary in Pakistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reforming the Judiciary in Pakistan REFORMING THE JUDICIARY IN PAKISTAN Asia Report N°160 – 16 October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND................................................................................................................ 3 A. ISLAMISING THE POLITY ..............................................................................................................3 B. VALIDATING MILITARY INTERVENTIONS .....................................................................................3 C. DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AND JUDICIAL REFORM......................................................................5 III. ISLAMISING THE LEGAL SYSTEM: INSTITUTIONALISED DISCRIMINATION.......................................................................................................... 6 A. THE BLASPHEMY LAW.................................................................................................................6 B. TARGETING AHMADIS..................................................................................................................8 C. WOMEN AND THE HUDOOD ORDINANCES ..................................................................................10 D. THE FEDERAL SHARIAT COURT .................................................................................................11 IV. RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW ............................................................................ 13 A. THE PENAL CODE: RESTORING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.............................................................14 B. PRIORITISING THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE ...................................................................................15 V. CONSOLIDATING DEMOCRACY............................................................................. 18 A. REVERSING MUSHARRAF’S LEGACY..........................................................................................18 1. Repealing the Seventeenth Amendment ....................................................................................18 2. Restoring the judges...................................................................................................................18 B. ASSESSING THE PPP’S CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM PACKAGE.....................................................20 1. Judicial appointments.................................................................................................................20 2. Judicial accountability ...............................................................................................................22 3. Judicial activism.........................................................................................................................22 4. Ending the doctrine of necessity ................................................................................................23 C. THE ROLE OF THE BAR: REFOCUSING THE LAWYERS’ MOVEMENT ............................................24 D. THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE........................................................................................................26 1. An ideology beyond Pakistan’s borders.....................................................................................26 2. International engagement...........................................................................................................27 VI. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................ 29 APPENDICES A. MAP OF PAKISTAN ...........................................................................................................................31 B. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP ....................................................................................32 C. CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON ASIA............................................................................33 D. CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES................................................................................................36 Asia Report N°160 16 October 2008 REFORMING THE JUDICIARY IN PAKISTAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Pakistan’s return to civilian government after eight years the judicial arm of the state must live up to its respon- of military rule and the sidelining of the military’s sibility to protect and preserve the constitution. religious allies in the February 2008 elections offer an opportunity to restore the rule of law and to review Pakistan’s two largest national-level parties, the Pakistan and repeal discriminatory religious laws that restrict People’s Party (PPP), now in government, and the fundamental rights, fuel extremism and destabilise the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the main country. Judicial reforms would remove the legal cover opposition party, have pledged to undo the legacy of under which extremists target their rivals and exploit military rule. Upon assuming power in March, the PPP a culture of violence and impunity. Ensuring judicial and PML-N, then coalition partners, released scores independence would also strengthen the transition to of political detainees, including lawyers and judges democracy at a time when it is being undermined by arrested during Musharraf’s November 2007 martial worsening violence. law. They also lifted the military regime’s ban on labour and student unions, and committed to enforcing basic Laws that discriminate on the basis of religion and human rights. The coalition government has since un- gender, including the blasphemy law, anti-Ahmadi laws, ravelled, primarily over disagreements on mechanisms Hudood Ordinances and Qisas (retribution) and Diyat to restore over 50 higher court judges, including the (bloody money) law, are part of the legacy of military Supreme Court chief justice, illegally dismissed during rule. Given constitutional cover by military rulers and Musharraf’s emergency. Nevertheless, both parties legal sanction by superior courts unwilling to uphold remain committed to restoring constitutionalism, the fundamental freedoms, these laws have undermined rule of law and judicial independence. Their ability to the rule of law, encouraged vigilantism and embold- reach consensus on the necessary constitutional changes ened religious extremists. These extremists have used to remove the military’s political distortions will deter- them to advance a radical ideology of exclusion, cur- mine the future of the democratic transition. tail free expression and discriminate against women and religious and sectarian minorities. Before the coalition collapsed, during negotiations with the PML-N on restoring the judges, the PPP had put Motivated by self-preservation and self-interest, Paki- together a proposed constitutional package, aimed also stan’s superior judiciary has not just failed to oppose at generating a public and parliamentary debate on Islamic legislation that violates fundamental rights but constitutional reform. While the proposals included has also repeatedly failed to uphold the constitution. useful suggestions on strengthening parliament’s role While superior courts have validated military interven- and undoing the military’s constitutional manipulations, tions, military regimes have manipulated judicial some proposed measures could undermine democratic appointments, promotions and removals, steadily purg- reform, including judicial independence. ing higher court benches of independent-minded judges. This has pushed the judiciary further to the ideological The PPP should, after parliamentary debate and public right. Today, judicial independence is hampered not only consultation, particularly with the bar associations by the state but also by right-wing religious groups. that have played a lead role in fighting military rule, introduce a constitutional amendment package to restore If democratic functioning is to be truly restored, the democratic functioning and the rule of law. Aside military’s politically motivated constitutional and legal from reintroducing constitutionally sanctioned checks changes that have radicalised swathes of Pakistani and balances between the executive, legislature and society must be reversed. If the democratic transition judiciary, any such package should focus on judicial is to be sustained and strengthened, the freely elected reform. An independent, reformed judiciary will not government must respect judicial independence, and only help underpin constitutionalism and the rule of law but could also play a crucial role in preventing Reforming the Judiciary in Pakistan Crisis Group Asia Report N°160, 16 October 2008 Page ii another direct or indirect authoritarian intervention. The guided by the May 2006 Charter of Democracy, government’s democratic credentials and the country’s comprising the chief justice of the Supreme political stability would also be best served with the Court, as its chair; the next two most senior ruling and opposition parties reaching agreement in Supreme Court justices; the four provincial chief parliament on reversing state-driven Islamisation, justices; a member of the Pakistan Bar Council repealing the laws that empower Islamist radicals at (PBC), nominated by the PBC; the president of the cost of the moderate majority. the Supreme Court Bar Association (in matters related to the Supreme Court); and the four The international community should avail itself of the presidents of the High
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REFORM OR REPRESSION? Post-Coup Abuses in Pakistan
    October 2000 Vol. 12, No. 6 (C) REFORM OR REPRESSION? Post-Coup Abuses in Pakistan I. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................2 II. RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................3 To the Government of Pakistan..............................................................................................................................3 To the International Community ............................................................................................................................5 III. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................................5 Musharraf‘s Stated Objectives ...............................................................................................................................6 IV. CONSOLIDATION OF MILITARY RULE .......................................................................................................8 Curbs on Judicial Independence.............................................................................................................................8 The Army‘s Role in Governance..........................................................................................................................10 Denial of Freedoms of Assembly and Association ..............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • File-1 Intro Paes
    Special Bulletin 2002 Karo Kari TorTora, Siyahkari, Kala Kali “There is no ‘honour’ in killing” National Seminar Report 25 November 2001, Lahore PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com The use of any material from this publication is to be acknowledged. Editors: Nabila Malick, Ishrat Saleem, Insha Hamdani Printed by Arqam, Lahore (2003) Tanslation: Mohammad Ali and Ali Zeeshan For funding we thank: Novib, Norad, SDC and Dfid Published by Shirkat Gah Women’s Resource Centre P.O. Box. 5192, Email: [email protected] [email protected] Lahore, Pakistan. P.O.Box. 13871 , Email: [email protected] Karachi, Pakistan P.O.Box. 747, [email protected] Peshawar, Pakistan. PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com Glossary diyat blood money payable to the heirs of a victim in case of murder faislo variously used in Sindhi for the resolution of a dispute, a decision and a judgement; also used to describe the traditional system of adjudication/settlement ghairat honour hadith sayings of the Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) harjana compensation ijtahad interpretation by the Muslim community iwaz compensation in the form of girl or money jirga tribal council kala kali refers to honour killings in Punjab where the victims are accused of illicit relationship (kala being man; kali being woman) karo kari refers to honour killings in Sindh where the victims are accused of illicit relationship (karo being man; kari being woman) khoon-baha blood money kot village mairh a delegation of local notables
    [Show full text]
  • P L D 2007 Supreme Court 202 [Shariat Appellate Jurisdiction
    P L D 2007 Supreme Court 202 [Shariat Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Abdul Hameed Dogar, Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, Mian Shakirullah Jan, Dr. Allama Khalid Mahmood and Dr. Rashid Ahmed Jullundhari, JJ NAZEER alias WAZEER---Appellant Versus THE STATE---Respondent Criminal Appeal No.53(S) of 2001, decided on 18th October, 2006. (On appeal from the judgment of Federal Shariat Court, dated 8-2-2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No.128/I of 2000 with M.R.41/I of 2000). (a) Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)--- ----S.10(3)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302(b) & 201---Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), S.12---Oaths Act (X of 1873), S.5---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 203- F(2-B)---Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider; whether Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 was applicable to the case; whether judicial confession made on oath could be used against the accused for sustaining death sentence; and whether such confession made on oath was admissible in evidence and could have been acted upon. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- --Ss. 164 & 364---Oaths Act (X of 1873), S.5---Judicial confession---Administering of oath to accused---Scope---Contention that confessional statement recorded on oath, if causes no prejudice or injustice to accused is admissible in evidence---Validity---Provisions of Ss.164 and 364, Cr.P.C. invariably apply to all sorts of statements---Confessional statement recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C. on oath is violative of S.5 of Oaths Act, 1873, which prohibits
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 SCMR 1824.Pdf
    TaxHelpline Case No. 153 of 2004 Supreme Court of Pakistan Cr. Petitions Nos.21 and 22/K of 2003, heard on 13th April, 2004 Present: Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J., Javed Iqbal and Abdul Hameed Dogar, JJ Akhlaq Ahmed Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for the Petitioner. M. Ilyas Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ms. Wajahat Niaz, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau---Petitioner Vs Agha WAZIR ABBAS and another---Respondents ORDER NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, C J.-----The Stale through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau (NAB), petitioner (in both petitions) has impugned the judgment, dated 8- 2-2003 of a learned Division Bench, High Court of Sindh, Karachi, whereby Criminal Accountability Appeals Nos.31 and 32 of 2002 were allowed and the respondents in both petitions were acquitted of the Reference filed against them, under section 10 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 and the sentences of seven years' R.I. and fine of Rs.25,00,000 each or in default thereof three years' S.I. and disqualification for a period of ten years from holding any representative office/office in the service of Pakistan, were set aside and they were ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. 2. The prosecution case against respondent Agha Wazir Abbas, an Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer in the Excise Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi and respondent Abdul Hameed, Manager of Messrs Standard Wine Company (Pvt.) Ltd. was that they along with the absconding accused, namely, Riaz Hassan Khoso, Abdul Razzak Abbasi, Asif Ikhlaq Ahmed and Saleh Muhammad Rahu were guilty of forging import and transport permits, evasion of vend fee and fee of cess charged on transport permits for the disposal of liquor, thereby caused loss of Rs.38,287,290 to the public exchequer.
    [Show full text]
  • Aurat Foundation
    ResearchedMaliha Zia and Written By Pakistan NGO Alternative Report Riffat Butt onExecutive CEDAW Summary– 2005-2009 (With Updated Notes - 2009-2012) Articles 1 – 4: ReviewedNeelam Hussain By Naeem Mirza Definition of Discrimination; Policy Measures Nasreen Azhar to be undertaken to Eliminate Discrimination; Guarantee of Younas Khalid Basic Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on an Equal ArticleBasis with 5: Men; Temporary Special Measures to Achieve ArticleEquality 6: Article 7: Sex Roles and Stereotyping Article 8: Trafficking and Prostitution Data Input by Aurat Article 9: Political and Public Life Foundation’s Team Participation at the International Level Article 10: Mahnaz Rahman, Rubina Brohi Nationality Article 11: (Karachi), Nasreen Zehra, Article 12: Equal Rights in Education Ume-Laila, Mumtaz Mughal, Article 13: Employment (Lahore), Shabina Ayaz, Article 14: Healthcare and Family Planning Saima Munir (Peshawar), Economic, Social & Cultural Benefits Haroon Dawood, Saima Javed Article 15: (Quetta), Wasim Wagha, Rural Women Article 16: Rabeea Hadi, Shamaila Tanvir, General RecommendationEquality before the 19: Law Farkhanda Aurangzeb, Myra Marriage and Family Imran (Islamabad) Violence against Women ChaptersImplementing Contributed CEDAW By in Pakistan DemocracyBy Tahira Abdullah and Women’s Rights: Pakistan’s Progress (2007-2012) Decentralization,By Ayesha Khan 18th Constitutional Amendment and Women’s Rights MinorityBy Rubina WomenSaigol of Pakistan: A Case of Double Jeopardy By Peter Jacob and Jennifer Jag Jewan Prepared By ii ThisAll publication rights is provided reserved gratis or sold, subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than in which it is published and without a similar condition being imposed on the subsequent publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feudal Tentacles: Is Feudalism Dead
    Pakistan Perspectives Vol. 21, No.2, July-December 2016 Study of the Emergency Rule in Pakistan, 2007 Khan Faqir & Fakhrul Islam Abstract Some of the steps of public interest litigation that the judiciary took in 2007 were considered as a threat to the military government of Pervez Musharraf. He dismissed the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, on the charges of corruption. This presidential move was not against the chief justice of Pakistan but against the judiciary. The executive intent to tarnish and erode judiciary’s image, integrity and authority was countered by a countrywide movement for the restoration of judiciary. A consolidated struggle of the bar and the bench lead to judicial revivalism in Pakistan. ______ Historical background Authoritarianism as a colonial legacy was incorporated in the political system of both Pakistan and India. From the very beginning India quite successfully tried to democratise itself. There ‘the rule of law was ever bent to subserve either executive action in the administration or the will of dominant elements of society’. On the other hand, Pakistan failed to make a worthwhile change to democratic rule after emerging from the debris of British colonialism. The colonial state was quickly replaced by authoritarian rulers, whether civilian or military. History of Pakistan has been defined by uneasy relationships between state institutions and civil society. In its executive-dominated state, the superior courts in particular have played unusually important part in determining the country’s political fate.1 The conflict between Pakistan’s executive orders and judicial authorities dates back to the era of Liaquat Ali Khan when the country was in its teething years.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Chaudhry Court": Deconstructing the "Judicialization of Politics" in Pakistan
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 25 Number 3 Asian Courts and the Constitutional Politics of the Twenty-First Century 6-1-2016 The "Chaudhry Court": Deconstructing the "Judicialization of Politics" in Pakistan Moeen H. Cheema Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Moeen H. Cheema, The "Chaudhry Court": Deconstructing the "Judicialization of Politics" in Pakistan, 25 Wash. L. Rev. 447 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol25/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2016 Washington International Law Journal Association THE “CHAUDHRY COURT”: DECONSTRUCTING THE “JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS” IN PAKISTAN Moeen H. Cheema† Abstract: The Supreme Court of Pakistan underwent a remarkable transformation in its institutional role and constitutional position during the tenure of the former Chief Justice of Pakistan, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry (2005–2013). This era in Pakistan’s judicial history was also marked by great controversy as the court faced charges that it had engaged in “judicial activism,” acted politically, and violated the constitutionally mandated separation of powers between institutions of the state. This article presents an in-depth analysis of the judicial review actions of the Chaudhry Court and argues that the charge of judicial activism is theoretically unsound and analytically obfuscating.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Shariʿa the Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib
    Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review By Shoaib A. Ghias A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Professor Martin M. Shapiro Professor Asad Q. Ahmed Summer 2015 Defining Shariʿa The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review © 2015 By Shoaib A. Ghias Abstract Defining Shariʿa: The Politics of Islamic Judicial Review by Shoaib A. Ghias Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Malcolm M. Feeley, Chair Since the Islamic resurgence of the 1970s, many Muslim postcolonial countries have established and empowered constitutional courts to declare laws conflicting with shariʿa as unconstitutional. The central question explored in this dissertation is whether and to what extent constitutional doctrine developed in shariʿa review is contingent on the ruling regime or represents lasting trends in interpretations of shariʿa. Using the case of Pakistan, this dissertation contends that the long-term discursive trends in shariʿa are determined in the religio-political space and only reflected in state law through the interaction of shariʿa politics, regime politics, and judicial politics. The research is based on materials gathered during fieldwork in Pakistan and datasets of Federal Shariat Court and Supreme Court cases and judges. In particular, the dissertation offers a political-institutional framework to study shariʿa review in a British postcolonial court system through exploring the role of professional and scholar judges, the discretion of the chief justice, the system of judicial appointments and tenure, and the political structure of appeal that combine to make courts agents of the political regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020 Table of Contents
    Against All Odds Extreme heat and pressure transforms iron ore dust to a strong and resilient Steel. With vision, hard work and perseverance, Aisha has emulated characteristics of Steel. It stood defiant and steadfast against every challenge thrown its way. Under its exemplary leadership and committed team, Aisha Steel, Against All Odds, has made it this far and is determined to push new frontiers. Contents Aisha Steel Mills Limited Annual Report 2020 Table of Contents Company Overview Performance Analysis 04 106 05 Vision and Mission Statement 108 Analysis of Financial and 06 Company Information Non-Financial Performance 08 Company Profile and Nature of Business 112 Key Operational and Financial Data 16 Business Model 113 Economic Value Added 18 Code of Business Conduct and Ethical 114 Ratio Analysis Principles 118 DuPont Analysis 20 Organization Chart 120 Horizontal and Vertical Analysis 22 Core Values 122 Summary of Cash Flow Statement 24 Critical Performance Indicators 124 Results Reported in Interim Financial 27 Value Chain Statements and Final Accounts 29 Calendar of Notable Events 126 Graphical Presentation of Aisha Steel 30 Salient Policies in Place 129 Cash Flow Statement - Direct Method 130 Share Price Sensitivity Analysis Governance 133 Statement of Value Addition and 36 Distribution 38 Directors’ Profile 48 Directors’ Report Financial Statements 58 Statement of Shares Bought and Sold 134 136 Auditors’ Review Report to the 58 Attendance of Directors in Meetings Members of Aisha Steel 59 Pattern of Shareholding 137 Statement
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle for Pakistan
    ebooksall.com ebooksall.com ebooksall.com SHUJA NAWAZ THE BATTLE F OR PAKISTAN The Bitter US Friendship and a Tough Neighbourhood PENGUIN BOOKS ebooksall.com Contents Important Milestones 2007–19 Abbreviations and Acronyms Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Footnotes Important Milestones 2007–19 Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Select Bibliography ebooksall.com Acknowledgements Follow Penguin Copyright ebooksall.com Advance Praise for the Book ‘An intriguing, comprehensive and compassionate analysis of the dysfunctional relationship between the United States and Pakistan by the premier expert on the Pakistan Army. Shuja Nawaz exposes the misconceptions and contradictions on both sides of one of the most crucial bilateral relations in the world’ —BRUCE RIEDEL, senior fellow and director of the Brookings Intelligence Project, and author of Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America and the Future of the Global Jihad ‘A superb, thoroughly researched account of the complex dynamics that have defined the internal and external realities of Pakistan over the past dozen years.
    [Show full text]
  • Honour Killing in Pakistan
    South Asian Studies A Research Journal of South Asian Studies Vol. 25, No. 2, July-December 2010, pp. 361-411 The Law on Honour Killing: A British Innovation in the Criminal Law of the Indian Subcontinent and its Subsequent Metamorphosis under Pakistan Penal Code Tahir H. Wasti The Islamic College, London ABSTRACT In the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, hundreds of women are killed every year in the name of honour. Such a barbaric and inhuman custom has existed in the subcontinent for many centuries yet under the pre-colonial criminal justice system of India; the perpetrators of such killings were dealt with like the other offenders of murder; without any exception or impunity from prosecution and punishment. However, it was the Indian Penal Code drafted by the British in 1860 that brought in the tradition of treating the offenders of honour killings with leniency and latitude. In 1990, Pakistan introduced its version of ‘Islamic’ criminal law which allowed for compromise between the parties of a murder case. The ‘new law’ reconceptualised the law of culpable homicide and murder in this country. Under the ‘new law’ the offence of murder was not defined as a crime against the legal order of the State but as against the legal heirs of the victim. Since in most honour related crimes the women are killed by their own family members, the new law provided a virtual immunity to the culprits of honour killings. During the past few years, thousands of men and women have been killed in honour-related crimes. This piece of research surveys the history and escalation in honour killings after the enforcement of Islamic criminal law in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction). PRESENT: Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ. Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Mr. Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan Mr. Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday Mr. Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani Mr. Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk Mr. Justice Raja Fayyaz Ahmed Mr. Justice Ch. Ijaz Ahmed Mr. Justice Ghulam Rabbani Mr. Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany Mr. Justice Muhammad Sair Ali Mr. Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja. CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 09 OF 2009 Sindh High Court Bar Association through its Secretary. ….PETITIONER CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 08 OF 2009 Nadeem Ahmed Advocate ….PETITIONER VERSUS Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad and others. ….RESPONDENTS For the petitioner: Mr. Hamid Khan, Sr. ASC. (Const.P.09/2009) Mr. Rashid A. Razvi, ASC. Mr. M. S. Khattak, AOR Assisted by M/s Waqar Rana, Waheed Khalid Khan & Haq Nawaz Talpur, Advocates. For the petitioner: Mr. Muhammad Akram Sheikh, Sr. ASC. (Const.P.08/2009) Assisted by Barristers Ms Natalya Kamal & Syed Shehryar, Advocates 2 For respondent No.1 Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa Attorney General for Pakistan. Agha Tariq Mehmood Khan, DAG Mr. Shah Khawar, DAG. Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR. For respondent No.2. Mr. Muhammad Yousaf Leghari, A.G.Sindh. Raja Abdul Ghafoor, AOR. For respondent Nos.3 & 4. Nemo. Respondent No.5. Not represented. Dates of hearing: 20th to 24th and 27th to 31st July, 2009. JUDGEMENT IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ.- The above Constitutional Petitions bearing Nos. 9 of 2009 and 8 of 2009 involve common questions of facts and law and are disposed of by this single judgment.
    [Show full text]