Sparkling Wines Class February 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties -
Climate Change Adaptation in the Champagne Region
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION IN THE CHAMPAGNE REGION PRESS PACK – JUNE 2019 Contents P. 3 THE CHALLENGE POSED BY CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHAMPAGNE P. 4 CHAMPAGNE’S CARBON FOOTPRINT P. 7 A PROGRAMME TO DEVELOP NEW GRAPE VARIETIES P. 10 VINE TRAINING P. 11 OENOLOGICAL PRACTICES P. 13 A REGION COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT P. 14 SUSTAINABLE VITICULTURE CERTIFICATION IN CHAMPAGNE THE CHALLENGE POSED BY CLIMATE CHANGE IN CHAMPAGNE GLOBAL WARMING IS A FACT. THE GLOBAL AVERAGE TEMPERATURE HAS INCREASED BY 0.8°C SINCE PRE-INDUSTRIAL TIMES. THE IMPACT CAN ALREADY BE SEEN IN CHAMPAGNE. CLIMATE CHANGE A REALITY IN THE REGION Over the past 30 years, the three key uni- versal bioclimatic indexes used to monitor Water balance local winegrowing conditions have evolved slightly down as follows: Huglin index rose from 1,565 to 1,800 Cool nights index rose from 9.8°C to 10.4°C Compared with the 30-year baseline average (1961-1990), the temperature has risen by 1.1°C ON AVERAGE. Average rainfall is still 700mm/year. Damage caused by spring frosts has slightly increased despite a drop in the number of frosty nights due to earlier bud burst. The consequences are already visible and are indeed positive for the quality of the musts: Over the past 30 years: - 1,3 g H2SO4/l total acidity Earlier harvests starting 18 days earlier + 0,7 % vol natural alcoholic strength by volume These beneficial effects may well continue if global warming is limited to a 2°C rise. However, the Champagne Region is now exploring ideas that would enable the inherent characteristics of its wines to be preserved in less optimistic climate change scenarios. -
Protecting South Australia from the Phylloxera Threat
The Phylloxera Fight Protecting South Australia from the phylloxera threat Wally Boehm Winetitles Adelaide 1996 in association with The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia First published in 1996 by Winetitles PO Box 1140 Marleston SA 5033 A USTR A LI A in association with The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide South Australia 5000 © Copyright 1996 Wally Boehm and The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be copied or reproduced by any means without the written permission of the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Boehm, E.W. (Ernest Walter). The phylloxera fight: protecting South Australia from the phylloxera threat. Includes index. ISBN 1 875130 21 7 1. Phylloxera – South Australia. 2. Grapes – Diseases and pests – South Australia. 3. Grapes – Diseases and pests – Control – South Australia. I. South Australia. Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board. II. Title 634.82752099423 Design and typesetting Michael Deves Printed and bound by Hyde Park Press CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 The Dread of Phylloxera 1 CHAPTER 2 Phylloxera in Australia 13 CHAPTER 3 Phylloxera Legislation 34 CHAPTER 4 Rootstocks and Virus 45 CHAPTER 5 Nurseries and New Varieties 53 CHAPTER 6 Biotypes 58 CHAPTER 7 Vine Introduction Procedure 62 APPENDIX 1 The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Act 1994 71 APPENDIX 2 Vine Variety Introductions to South Australia 75 INDEX 90 Record of Board Membership Chairmen District 2 O.B. SEPPELT 1926–1933 O.B. Seppelt 1926–1933 Keith Leon RAINSFORD 1933–1944 Friedrich William Gursansky 1933–1955 Frederick Walter KAY 1944–1947 O.S. -
Answer Key Certified Specialist of Wine Workbook to Accompany the 2014 CSW Study Guide
Answer Key Certified Specialist of Wine Workbook To Accompany the 2014 CSW Study Guide Chapter 1: Wine Composition and Chemistry Exercise 1 (Chapter 1): Wine Components: Matching 1. Tartaric Acid 6. Glycerol 2. Water 7. Malic Acid 3. Legs 8. Lactic Acid 4. Citric Acid 9. Succinic Acid 5. Ethyl Alcohol 10. Acetic Acid Exercise 2 (Chapter 1): Wine Components: Fill in the Blank/Short Answer 1. Tartaric Acid, Malic Acid, and Citric Acid 2. Citric Acid 3. Tartaric Acid 4. Malolactic Fermentation 5. TA (Total Acidity) 6. The combined chemical strength of all acids present. 7. 2.9 (considering the normal range of wine pH ranges from 2.9 – 3.9) 8. 3.9 (considering the normal range of wine pH ranges from 2.9 – 3.9) 9. Glucose and Fructose 10. Dry Exercise 3 (Chapter 1): Phenolic Compounds and Other Components: Matching 1. Flavonols 7. Tannins 2. Vanillin 8. Esters 3. Resveratrol 9. Sediment 4. Ethyl Acetate 10. Sulfur 5. Acetaldehyde 11. Aldehydes 6. Anthocyanins 12. Carbon Dioxide Exercise 4 (Chapter 1): Phenolic Compounds and Other Components: True or False 1. False 7. True 2. True 8. False 3. True 9. False 4. True 10. True 5. False 11. False 6. True 12. False Exercise 5: Checkpoint Quiz – Chapter 1 1. C 6. C 2. B 7. B 3. D 8. A 4. C 9. D 5. A 10. C Chapter 2: Wine Faults Exercise 1 (Chapter 2): Wine Faults: Matching 1. Bacteria 6. Bacteria 2. Yeast 7. Bacteria 3. Oxidation 8. Oxidation 4. Sulfur Compounds 9. Yeast 5. -
Olivier Horiot Profile
Olivier Horiot Profile In the southern-most part of the Champagne region, the Côte des Bar in the Aube department, there is the town of Les Riceys, where the slopes are blessed with the portlandian formation of Kimmeridgian chalk, that same great stuff that is the foundation of the finest Chablis and Sancerre. Except here the idea was to plant Pinot Noir on these chalky slopes, do a long maceration, often using whole bunches, and then age it a few years (at least 3) before release -- not exactly your average deck wine. Olivier Horiot took over the estate of his father Serge in 1999; though it bears his name due to inheritance, his wife Marie is essential to day to day operations and runs the cellar. They immediately started using organic and some biodynamic practices, as well as highlighting specific parcels in the effort of being more terroir-focused. In order to make the Rosé des Riceys, the Horiot do a very strict selection of grapes from two separate sites - en Valingrain and en Barmont - vinifying them separately. The wines start with about 10% of the grapes foot-trodden at the bottom of the cuve, then whole bunches are added. Macerations usually last 5-6 days, with pumping over twice a day. After the wine is racked into older barrels, it remains there for a few years before being bottled without fining or filtration. The Horiot also produce 4 Champagnes: a Blanc de Noir from the en Barmont site named Sève, two blends of multiple parcels, 5 Sens and Métisse, as well as a quirky, unexpected Champagne produced with the Arbane grape, aptly named Arbane. -
The-Fly-121719.Pdf
SPARKLING Anima Mundi ‘cami dels xops’ macabeu + penedes spain ‘18 15 | 50 Montesissa ‘Rosissima’ barbera + emilia romagna italy ‘18 ROSE MAGNUM100 Vins Contes ‘pow blop wizz’ cab franc + touraine france ‘18 ROSE 63 Early Mountain Vineyards ‘petillant-naturel’ blaufrankisch virginia usa RED 57 Werlitsch ‘sekt’ chardonnay styria austria NV 120 Domaine La Boheme ‘festejar’ gamay d’auvergne loire valley france ‘15 ROSE 74 Christophe Mignon ‘brut nature’ pinot meunier champagne france NV 110 Olivier Horiot ‘solera brut nature’ arbane + champagne france NV 138 Marie Courtin ‘efflorescence extra brut’ pinot noir champagne france ‘13 135 Marie Courtin ‘resonance extra brut’ pinot noir champagne france ‘14 130 Georges Laval ‘cumieres brut nature’ chardonnay + champagne france NV 158 WHITE Vinateros Bravos ‘la ruptura’ muscat sur chile ‘18 12 | 46 Domaine Kox ‘cotes de remich’ elbling wellenstein luxembourg ‘18 LITER 9 | 32 Peter Lauer ‘barrel x’ riesling mosel germany ‘18 14 | 48 Mosse ‘chenin’ chenin blanc anjou france ‘18 18 | 60 Mosse ‘chenin’ chenin blanc anjou france ‘18 MAGNUM 120 YoYo ‘restake’ carignan gris + banyuls france ‘18 95 Microbio ‘correcaminos’ verdejo castilla y leon spain ‘18 58 Johannes Zillinger ‘numen’ sauvignon blanc weinviertel austria ‘16 105 Stein ‘alfer holle 1900’ riesling mosel germany ‘17 120 Valentin Morel ‘les trouillots’ chardonnay jura france ‘16 85 Les Vignes Herbel ‘la pointe’ chenin blanc loire france ‘07 140 Domaine de L’Ecu ‘muscadet classic’ melon de bourgogne loire fr ‘18 44 Francois Chidaine ‘les bournais’ -
The Second Once in a Lifetime Dinner Two Years Ago We Offered a Unique Dinner and Tasting That, in Retrospect, Certainly Deserved the ‘Once in a Lifetime’ Description
The Second Once In A Lifetime Dinner Two years ago we offered a unique dinner and tasting that, in retrospect, certainly deserved the ‘Once in A Lifetime’ description. Now we will try to match that experience, returning to Splendido, still the finest dining destination in Toronto, with a new set of rare (and we hope, spectacular) wines. The theme this time will be the First Growths of Bordeaux, primarily from the year 1971 – supplemented by a couple of other First Growths that are a bit younger. The 1971 wines are now 40 years old – past their flush of youth, but will have developed the complexity that only comes with time. The previous year 1970 was the first great ‘modern’ vintage with super-ripe grapes and large production (similar to 1982). The Bordeaux prices leapt upwards and 1971 (which only yielded half the quantity of 1970) fell under the shadow of the 1970’s and was overlooked. But it has always been rated as a ‘very good’ vintage. The food match last time was superb – and we’re working closely with the same team. The food was prepared to support and showcase the wines. No chef egos here – just a superb feeling for the perfect combination of food and wine, using the freshest ingredients. Again we will occupy the private wine cellar. Our 1971 wines are from Château Lafite-Rothschild, Château Mouton Rothschild and Château Cheval Blanc. We will also feature two superb vintages of Château Margaux, 1983 and 1995 – Margaux had underperformed during the 70’s but after an ownership change in 1977 was completely re-vamped and by 1983 was probably the top- ranked of all the first-growths. -
Innovations Involved in Champagne Production
Innovations involved in Champagne Production circa 1700 - still, unblended, low alcohol (~9%), low tannin, acidic, darkish rosé (oeil de perdrix) - mild fruity/yeasty flavor (verjus pétillant) - sold in barrels in the spring - derived from crushed grapes & made from the first three pressings today - sparkling, blended, 12.5% EtOH, - low tannin, white, delicate complex - minimally fruity, toasty flavor, - 2nd fermentation in spring, - released $18 m after production - sold bottled - derived from whole grape clusters & primarily from the first pressing Knowledge and conditions ~ 1700 - the role of yeasts and bacteria in fermentation and wine ‘diseases’ unknown; - no means of measuring the sugar content of wine (leading to variability in degree of effervescence) - no tirage - cork closures and availablity of glass bottles just appearing - extensive bottle rupture due to the glass irregularity and inability to sustain the carbon dioxide buildup - occurrence of the “Little Ice Age,” (associated with early and late frosts, and poor grape maturation) - riddling unknown; inefficient disgorging procedures Current procedures - manual harvest (aiming for low EBrix) and EtOH 9–9.5% - slow pressing of whole grape clusters - use of oak as fermentation or maturation cooperage individualistic - malolactic fermentation (reduce excess grape acidity) - maturation and clarification until spring - blending to produce the assemblage - addition of a tirage (sugar, yeast, yeast nutrients, fining agent) - second fermentation (~10 EC) - storage for at least 15 -
DRAFT M Ission Brewery California Craft Lager, 4.2% Abv – California, 16 Oz
DRAFT M ission Brewery California Craft Lager, 4.2% abv – California, 16 oz. 8 M other Earth Boo Koo IPA, 6.5% abv – California, 16 oz. 8 Kiushi Brewery Hitachino Nest White Ale, 5% abv – Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan 16 oz 12 NV Allimant-Laugner Crémant d’Alsace Rosé Pinot Noir – Alsace, France 11 / 43 NV Meyer-Fonné Cremant d’Alsace Pinot Auxerrois, Chardonnay, Pinot Blanc/Noir – Alsace, France 12 / 45 NV Léguillette Romelot “Opus No 12” Brut Pinot Meunier/Blanc/Noir, Chardonnay,Petit Meslier – Champagne, France 19 / 60 CHÂTEAU PESQUIÉ FLIGHT – Rhône Valley Wine Flight – 16.50 for 2oz each 2016 Château Pesquié “Terasses” Blanc Viognier, Roussanne, Clairette – Ventoux, France 10 / 36 2014 Château Pesquié “Terasses” Rouge Grenache, Syrah – Ventoux, France 10 / 36 2014 Château Pesquié “Quintessence” Rouge Syrah, Grenache – Ventoux, France 13 / 42 PINOT ME IS TO LOVE ME! – Red Wine Flight – 24. for 2oz each 2014 Comanche Cellars Savaria Vineyard Pinot Noir – Santa Cruz Mountains 14 / 55 2015 Drew Family Cellars “The Fog-Eater” Pinot Noir – Anderson Valley 16 / 68 2014 The Ojai Fe Ciega Vineyard Pinot Noir – Santa Rita Hills 18 / 75 LOCAL LOVE – Wines from Santa Cruz – 20. for 2oz each 2016 Margins Wine Wilson Vineyards Chenin Blanc – Clarksburg, California 12 / 48 2015 Sante Arcangeli Pinot Noir – Santa Cruz Mountains 14 / 59 2014 Domaine Eden Estate Cabernet Sauvignon – Santa Cruz Mountains 14 / 54 2015 Domaine Trotereau Quincy Sauvignon Blanc – Loire Valley, France 13 / 44 2016 Weingüt Nik Weis St. Urbans-Hof Estate Riesling – Mosel, Germany -
Essai De Classement Des Cépages Français En Écogéogroupes Phénotypiques
ESSAI DE CLASSEMENT DES CÉPAGES FRANÇAIS EN ÉCOGÉOGROUPES PHÉNOTYPIQUES FRENCH GRAPEVINES CLASSED IN PHENOTYPICAL ECOGEOGROUPS ESSAY J. BISSON B.P. 51, 45250 Briare, France Résumé : Les propositions antérieures de structure des cépages français en groupes écogéographiques sont déve- loppées par l'intégration des formes individuelles en unités taxonomiques basées sur la morphologie. Sans que le travail présenté ici puisse être considéré comme certain et définitif, tel quel, il est offert à titre comparatif aux avan- cées de biochimie génétique récemment effectuées. Abstract : Two specialists, NEGRUL (1946) et LEVADOUX (1948) proposed for Europe vine-plants cultiva- ted a classification in natural groups issued from ecogeographical areas relatively closed in their situations and evo- lutions. These ampelographs are complementary in their propositions, Russian for Eastern Europe and French for Western forms. Middle-East is the probable origin of mediterranean viticulture with its vine-varieties then the local wild forms in more septentrional vineyard extensions. After sortotypes or ecogeogroups definitions, anterior structural propositions of French vine-varieties in eco-geo- graphical groups are developped by individual integration forms in taxonomic and morphologic unities. The pre- sent propositions are not immovable nor definitive but as such they may be useful in recent genetic advancements. They can confirm or not some new biochemical diagnosis. Mots clés : Vitis vinifera, cépages, ampélographie, taxonomie Key words : Vitis vinifera, vine-varieties, ampelography, taxonomy INTRODUCTION Aujourd'hui, la mise au point de méthodes biochi- miques d'identification et de codage génétique La taxonomie ampélographique classique basée (BOURSIQUOT, 1987 ; CUISSET 1997 ; BOWERS essentiellement sur la morphologie des cépages condui- et MEREDITH, 1997) viendra confirmer ou infirmer sit NEGRUL (1946) et LEVADOUX (1948) à les résultats obtenus par les observations morpholo- proposer la notion de sortotype ou de groupe écolo- giques. -
Wine-List-2-14-2020.Pdf
Wines & Beers Wine List 2004- 2019 February 14, 2020 “What is the definition of a good wine? It should start and end with a smile” William Sokolin Contents Sparkling ................................................................................................... 4 Whites ........................................................................................................ 4 Rosé ........................................................................................................... 5 Reds ........................................................................................................... 5 Champagne and Sparkling Wines .......................................................... 6 White Wines ........................................................................................... 7 Light Body Whites Wines .................................................................... 7 Medium Body Whites Wines ............................................................... 9 Full Body White Wines ...................................................................... 10 Rosé & Orange Wines........................................................................... 11 Red Wines ............................................................................................... 12 Light Body Reds .................................................................................. 12 Medium Body Reds ............................................................................ 13 Medium Body Reds ........................................................................... -
CROIX D'irval (France, Champagne
CROIX D’IRVAL (France, Champagne, Coulommes la Montagne) BACKGROUND: Jean Servagnat is in his early 30s and left his bank career in 2010 to pursue wine making. His family has been in Champagne for many generations, living at Irval and owns a 4.5 hectares vineyard at Coulommes la Montagne, between Reims and Epernay. Historical references to the property name are pretty easy to track down. Croix d’Irval brings together ancient roots and history as a large cross stands at the top of a roof at Irval, linked to the crusades during the 14th century. Now, this powerful cross represents the family ‘savoir-faire’ and values, fashioned by time, by the understanding of the nature around them and by high quality requirements. The cuverie is in neighboring Vrigny and is state-of-the-art. Jean currently blends 50% of harvest juice (for bottles commercialized in 2016, 2012 vintage) with 50% reserve wine (in 2016, wines from older vintage, mainly 2011 and 2010) from older family plots of 2.5 additional hectares. In 2020, the family’s 20-yr rental agreement on these vineyards will expire and Croix D’Irval will possess 7 hectares in total (including 2.5 ha in Sermiers). A PREMIER CRU CHAMPAGNE: The current offering of Croix D’Irval Brut 1er Cru comes from 25-year old vines in Coulommes. The interesting blend is 70% Pinot Meunier (plus equal parts Chardonnay and Pinot Noir), producing a clean, structured but fruity profile with lasting minerality. The color is a beautiful pale hue and the bubbles are elegant and persistent.