Herpetology Notes, volume 11: 819-823 (2018) (published online on 27 September 2018)

The amplectant and aggressive calls and notes on the reproductive behaviour of the Porthole ( taeniopus)

José M. Serrano1,2,*

Abstract. The behavioural context at which reproductive calls, other than advertisement call, are performed by anurans has been rarely studied in depth. Herein I describe in detail the vocalization behaviour of a frog whose voice was enigmatic until now. Amplectant and aggressive calls of the porthole frog Charadrahyla taeniopus (Günther, 1901) are described showing their differences in temporal and spectral characteristics. The number of produced calls from each type fluctuated in an alternate pattern over the 28 minutes recorded. Although some signal of assortative mating was detected in the pair size correlation test, no statistical differences were detected between the body size of amplectant and by-stander males.

Keywords. Anuran communication, sounds repertoire, fluctuating behaviour, stream breeder frog

Introduction 1980; Bowcock et al., 2008), and are of potential interest for the evolution of anuran communication (Schmidt et Anurans rely on acoustic signals for communicating al., 1990). in diverse contexts. After the pioneering publication Stream have adapted their calling behaviour to of Bogert (1960), vocal signals of anurans are usually overcome the running water noise, by emitting high- referred to as calls and traditionally defined in relation frequency harmonics in their vocalizations, some to the context in which they are produced (Wells, 1977; reaching the ultrasonic domain (Dubois and Martens, Wells and Schwartz, 2007). More recently Toledo et al. 1984; Narins et al., 2004, Vargas-Salinas et al., 2014), (2014) defined anuran call types and pointed out that a or displaying visual cues (Preininger et al., 2013) to correct classification of calls is a complex task in many communicate with conspecifics. Alternatively, some cases, particularly when these are highly variable or low stream species like Rhinella arunco and Rhinella occur in different contexts; e.g., aggressive calls (Greer and Wells, 1980). Female-attracting advertisement spinulosa do not produce advertisement calls but calls produced by males are by far the most studied amplectant calls (Penna and Veloso, 1981). Some vocalization in frogs (Wells and Schwartz, 2007), stream-dwelling species exhibit vocal sacs but their while other acoustic signals also produced in mating advertisement calls have never been recorded and only contexts like aggressive and amplectant calls remain increased fieldwork could to resolve whether these frogs understudied. By instance, amplectant calls have been produce low amplitude and sporadic sounds or have rarely reported in anurans (Toledo et al., 2014; Köhler evolved true voiceless (Emerson and Berrigan, 1993). et al., 2017), although they are continually performed by The genus Charadrahyla is a group of stream frogs some species during long reproductive clasps (Picker, distributed in tropical southern Mexico. Males of some species from the genus form chorus where callers and non-callers get involved in scramble competition for the acquisition of mates (Duellman, 2001). Males and females of the porthole frog C. taeniopus are usually 1 Posgrado, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, found between canopy vegetation of cloud forests near México. to permanent and generally quiet streams. The species 2 Present address: Programa de Fisiología y Biofísica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Independencia 1027, has sexually dimorphic colour and body shape patterns 8380453, Independencia, Santiago, Chile. (Duellman, 2001). The female dorsum is reddish, while * Author e-mail: [email protected] the dorsum of males is yellow-green bright, and their 820 José M. Serrano

Materials and Methods A breeding aggregation of C. taeniopus located in a region of cloud forest in Central Veracruz, Mexico, known as “El Riscal” (19.4822°N, 96.9978°W; 1600 m altitude) on the night of 26 November 2007 was found during the search for the syntopic species miotympanum. The area of the perennial stream where the group of callers was located was low flowing and silent, with pools having a maximum 0.5 m deep and 1.5 m wide, muddy bottom, submerged leaf litters and some algae. The vocal activity was recorded with a digital recorder Olympus DS30 (built-in stereo microphone, 44 kHz sampling rate, 16-bit resolution) was positioned from ~ 50 cm above the centre of the calling group with an arm stand. To avoid interrupting reproductive and aggressive interactions focal recordings of closely calling individuals were not attempted. Detailed descriptions of the behaviour observed were dictated onto the recording. After recording the vocalizations, snout-vent length (SVL) of amplectant pairs and unpaired males were measured using a calliper (error = 0.1 mm). Acoustic analysis of isolated, non-overlapping calls in the recordings was carried out using Sound Ruler 0.9.6.0 software (Gridi-Papp, 2007). Call duration, note duration, and inter-note interval duration were measured from oscillograms and the dominant frequency was measured using the automated mode employing the Figure 1. Photographs of the porthole frog Chraradrahyla Hamming window and FFT with 1060 samples. The taeniopus showing: A) a couple of male and female in context in which calls were produced and the difference amplexus; B) the breeding aggregation during scramble observed in their acoustic properties were used to competition behaviour. define the types of calls based on Köhler et al. (2017). The number of the different type of calls observed was counted using two-minute bins. The relationship among the sizes of males and females snouts are narrow and pointed relative to females (Fig in amplexus was estimated to evaluate the occurrence of 1A). The mating season of C. taeniopus extends from size-assortative mating. Spearman correlation index was late fall to mid-winter (Duellman, 2001), corresponding applied with this purpose due to the small number of to the period of cold rains known as “nortes,” originated pairs observed. Body sizes of amplectant and unpaired in the Gulf of Mexico (Williams-Linera, 2007). Eggs males were compared with the non-parametrical U- are laid in streams, where tadpoles probably develop Mann-Whitney test. All statistics were performed using until the following summer or fall (Duellman, 2001). R statistical software v.3.0.2 (http://www.r-project. Charadrahyla taeniopus has not been observed to org). vocalize in the wild, despite having bilateral vocal slits (Duellman, 2001). The main purpose of this manuscript Results is to describe for the first time the calling behaviour and acoustic emissions of C. taeniopus, including the A group formed by 32 males and 11 females of C. temporary sequence of exchange for two types of calls. taeniopus was observed spread over two meters along Additionally, data on the size of amplectant individuals the stream. This group was detected by the scramble was used to evaluate whether size-assortative mating noise of calls and repeated jumps on water. The vocal might be occurring in this species. activity of the group was recorded for 28 minutes, The amplectant and aggressive calls of the Porthole Frog 821

Figure 2. Oscillogram, spectrogram and power spectra of amplectant and aggressive calls of Charadrahyla taeniopus. A) Representative amplectant call consisting of a series of three notes composed by two pulse groups, the power spectrum corresponds to the double pulse of the first note. B) Representative aggressive call, the power spectrum corresponds to the second note.

starting at 22:45 h. Two different types of calls were physical contact with other males during scrambling produced by males of C. taeniopus in different social competition and in attempts to displace other males contexts during a breeding aggregation and these from amplexus (Fig. 1B). The vocal sacs did not were clearly distinguishable in spectrograms and inflate markedly during the broadcast of both types of oscillograms. Amplectant calls were emitted by males calls, rather than that, remarkable muscular thoracic holding a female in amplexus (Fig. 1A). Vocalizations contractions in direct contact with the female dorsum referred as aggressive calls were produced by males in were observed. 822 José M. Serrano

Table 1. Acoustic characteristics of amplectant and aggressive calls produced by a group of Charadrahyla taeniopus males in a Table 1. Acoustic characteristics of amplectant and aggressive calls produced by a group of Charadrahyla taeniopus breeding aggregation.males Abbreviations: in a breeding aggregation. DF= dominant Abbreviations: frequency, DF= CD= dominant call frequency,duration, ND=CD= call note duration, duration, ND= IN= note inter duration, note interval duration, NN= numberIN= inter of notes.note interval Averages duration, with NN= ranges number in parenthesis of notes. Averages are shown. with ranges in parenthesis are shown.

Call type DF (Hz) CD (s) ND (ms) IN (s) NN Amplectant 1707 2.21 10.85 0.19 5.3 (n= 358) (692 – 2670) (0.05–11.82) (0.66 –31.68) (0.03 – 0.38) (1 – 31) Aggressive 1436 0.45 18.64 0.08 5.5 (n= 320) (775 – 2497) (0.107–1.19) (1.92 – 37.57) (0.04 – 0.25) (1 – 13)

Acoustic characteristics of amplectant and aggressive high motor activity in which males struggled and calls produced by C. taeniopus are listed in Table 1. jumped restlessly. The air temperature measured at the Amplectant calls (N= 358) included bouts of notes (1 beginning of the recording period was 15.6° C, and – 31) containing (5 – 7) harmonics, with a dominant relative humidity measured at five cm above the stream frequency (692 – 2670 Hz) corresponding to the first surface was 92.5%. These environmental conditions to third harmonic. The notes were formed by one to remained constant throughout the recording period. three pulses, the first pulse formed typically by lower All 11 females observed in the group were clasped by amplitude than the following (Fig. 2A). Aggressive males. Females collected had a SVL mean ± SE = 68.45 calls (N= 320) consisted in bouts of un-pulsed and ± 7.35 mm and were larger than the 21 collected males frequency modulated notes having a longer duration (mean ± SE =59.91 ± 1.93 mm). The size of males and (1.9 – 37.6 ms) and regularly more harmonics (4 – 9) females in amplexus was positively correlated (n = 11 than amplectant calls. The dominant frequency (775 pairs, Spearman r=0.83; p< 0.05) but sizes of solitary (n = – 2497 Hz) occurred typically on the second harmonic 10) and amplectant males did not differ (Mann-Whitney although in some calls the first or third harmonics were U =5; p<0.05). The solitary males were separated by a the dominant (Fig. 2B). distance visually estimated among 5 – 120 cm of the Both call types were produced in alternating bouts pairs and some of them attempted to disrupt amplectant of activity that lasted about four to six min during the pairs. Such sporadic attempts by solitary males to observation period (Fig. 3). During recording, bouts displace clasped couples were unsuccessful during the of aggressive calls were produced during periods of entire observation period. The solitary males followed the group of 11 amplectant pairs as they moved upstream and occasionally out of the water. During the recording period, the mating aggregation moved upstream approximately 12 m. Most of the couples in amplexus were situated at the end of the observation period over an area of approximately 5m2 along the stream where the water depth was between five and 50 cm. The morning after, egg clutches were found at the site. Several dozens of egg strings, typical of this species (Duellman, 2001), remained on the muddy edge of the stream and others were submerged, attached to the walls and fallen branches or leaf litter on the stream.

Discussion

Figure 3. Number of amplectant (dashed line) and aggressive Calling behaviour of C. taeniopus reported in this (continuous line) calls produced by males of a breeding group study refutes the idea that this is a voiceless frog. The of the porthole frog Charadrahyla taeniopus composed of repertoire of calls produced by males was associated about 11 females and 32 males throughout the recording with two general contexts: amplexus with females and period on 26 November 2007. the aggression between males. Amplectant calls similar The amplectant and aggressive calls of the Porthole Frog 823 to those produced by C. taeniopus have been also Campbell, J.A, Blancas-Hernández, J.C., Smith, E.N. (2009): described for Anaxyrus americanus (Price and Meyer, A New Species of Stream-breeding Treefrog of the Genus 1979; Schmidt et al., 1990), R. arunco and R. spinulosa Charadrahyla () from the Sierra Madre del Sur of Guerrero, Mexico. Copeia 2009: 287–295. (Penna and Veloso, 1981), and Pelobates cultripes Duellman, W.E. (2001): The hylid frogs of Middle America, 2nd (Lizana et al., 1994). Aggressive calls of C. taeniopus Edition. Ithaca, USA, Society for the Study of and occurred during encounter, fighting and displacement Reptiles. contexts involving physical contact between males Emerson, S. B., Berrigan, D. (1993): Systematics of Southeast as has been described for other species (Köhler et al., Asian ranids: multiple origins of voicelessness in the subgenus 2017). Limnonectes (Fitzinger). Herpetologica 49: 22–31. In C. taeniopus, the number of aggressive and Gridi-Papp, M. (2007): Sound ruler. Acoustic Analysis. Version 0.9.6.0. Available at: http://soundruler.sourceforge.net. amplectant calls peaked in an alternating sequence Köhler, J., Jansen, M., Rodríguez, A., Kok, P., Toledo, L.F., during the recording period which could indicate Emmrich, M., Glaw, F., Haddad, C.F.B., Rödel, M.-O., Vences, that male-male confrontation and female stimulation M. (2017): The use of bioacoustics in anuran : theory, behaviours alternate in these breeding aggregations. terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Nevertheless, the drivers of this fluctuating behaviour Zootaxa 4251: 1–124. or the events that triggered the amplexus between males Lizana, M., Marquez, R., Martin-Sánchez, R. (1994): Reproductive and females were not detected. biology of Pelobates cultripes (Anura: Pelobatidae) in Central Spain. Journal of Herpetology 28: 19–27. Streams typically emit noise in the 400 – 3000 Hz Mendelson III, J.R., Campbell, J.A. (1999): The taxonomic status range (Narins et al., 2004; Penna et al., 2005). Male of populations referred to chaneque in southern Mexico, aggressive and amplectant calls of C. taeniopus contain with the description of a new treefrog from Oaxaca. Journal of low to mid frequencies somewhat above the frequency Herpetology 33: 80–86. range of the study steam which produced very low noise. Penna, M., Veloso, A.M. (1991): Acoustical signals related to Given these considerations, the stream noise would reproduction in the spinolosus species group of Bufo (Amphibia, have a reduced effect on the sound communication in Bufonidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 59: 54–60. this species. Penna, M., Pottstock, H., Velasquez, N. (2005): Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the The knowledge about calling behaviour within temperate austral forest. Behaviour 70: 639–651. the genus Charadrahyla is deeply uncertain. Verbal Picker, M. (1980): Xenopus laevis (Anura: Pipidae) mating and simple descriptions have been made from the systems – a preliminary synthesis with some data on the female advertisement calls of C. nephila, C. chaneque and C. phonoresponse. Southern African Journal of Zoology 15: 150– tecuani (Mendelson III and Campbell, 1999; Duellman, 158. 2001; Campbell et al., 2009). Apart from C. taeniopus, Price, R.M., Meyer, E.R. (1979): An amplexus call made by the detailed in this manuscript, it is unknown if similar calls male American toad, Bufo americanus (Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae). Journal of Herpetology 13: 506–509. are produced in equivalent mating contexts by other Schmidt, R.S., Kemnitz, C.P., Hudson, W.R. (1990): Origin species of the genus. Detailed studies on the sounds of anuran calling: description of toad releasing. Journal of of these species, backed by a robust phylogeny on Experimental Zoology 254: 338–342. Charadrahyla would provide a more comprehensive Toledo, L.F., Martins, I.A., Bruschi, D.P., Passos, M.A., Alexandre, picture on call evolution in these anurans. C., Haddad, C.F.B. (2014): The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethologica 18: 87–99. Acknowledgements. This work was partially supported by the Wells, K.D. (1977): The social behavior of anuran amphibians. scholarship CONACYT No. 204479. Mario Penna and Rene Animal Behaviour 25: 666–693. Murrieta-Galindo made important suggestions to improve this Wells, K.D., Schwartz, J.J. (2007): The behavioral ecology of manuscript. anuran communication. In: Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians, p. 44–86. Narins, P., Feng, A.S., Fay, R.R., Eds. New York, USA, Springer. References Williams-Linera, G. (2007): El Bosque de niebla del centro Bogert, C.M. (1960): The influence of sound on the behavior of de Veracruz: Ecología, historia y destino en tiempos de amphibians and reptiles. In: Animal Sounds and communication fragmentación y cambio climático. Xalapa, Mexico, Comisión p.137–320. Lanyion W.W., W.W. Tavolga, Eds., Port Jervis, Nacional para el Conocimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad and USA, Lubrecht and Cramer. Instituto de Ecología A.C. Bowcock, H., Brown, G.P., Shine, R. (2008): Sexual Communication in cane toads, Chaunus marinus: what cues Accepted by Ariel Rodríguez influence the duration of amplexus? Animal Behaviour 75: 1571–1579.