DOCSLIB.ORG

COMMUNIA Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COMMUNIA Final Report Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report ECP‐2006‐PSI‐610001 COMMUNIA http://COMMUNIA‐project.eu/ Final Report Deliverable number/name Deliverable D1.11: Final Report Dissemination level Public Delivery date March 31, 2011 Status FINAL VERSION TO REVIEWERS Main Author Giancarlo F. Frosio This document incorporates the results of several months of discussions among COMMUNIA members. The main author and the project coordinator wish to thank everyone who contributed, and particularly Lucie Guibault, Paul Keller, Séverine Dusollier and Patrick Peiffer whose comments and analyzes have greatly enhanced this text. eContentplus This project is funded under the eContentplus prograMMe,1 a Multiannual CoMMunity prograMMe to Make digital content in Europe More accessible, usable and exploitable. 1 O.J. L 79 (March 24, 2005), at 1. 1 Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report 2 Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report CONTENTS CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 COMMUNIA FINAL REPORT .................................................................................................................................. 7 WHAT IS THE PUBLIC DOMAIN? ........................................................................................................................... 7 THE VALUE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN FOR EUROPE ................................................................................................. 11 PUBLIC DOMAIN CHALLENGES AND BOTTLENECKS ................................................................................................. 18 THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION STRATEGY ......................................................................... 29 COMMUNIA AND THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC DOMAIN PROJECT ................................................................................ 31 WHAT CAN EUROPE DO FOR THE PUBLIC DOMAIN? .............................................................................................. 34 ANNEX I ............................................................................................................................................................. 40 COMMUNIA PROJECT ........................................................................................................................................ 40 The COMMUNIA Project ............................................................................................................................. 40 The COMMUNIA Network ........................................................................................................................... 40 The COMMUNIA Working Groups ............................................................................................................... 41 The COMMUNIA Meetings and Events ....................................................................................................... 43 The Public Domain Manifesto ..................................................................................................................... 45 The Public Domain Day ............................................................................................................................... 46 The COMMUNIA Essence ............................................................................................................................ 46 ANNEX II ............................................................................................................................................................ 51 THE DIGITAL PUbLIC DOMAIN IN EUROPE ................................................................................................................ 51 Defining the Public Domain ......................................................................................................................... 51 In Search of an Affirmative Definition of the Public Domain .................................................................. 52 Public Domain, Commons, and Cultural Environmentalism ................................................................... 55 The European Public Domain Project and Manifestos ............................................................................ 61 The Value of the Public Domain .................................................................................................................. 65 The Sources of the Public Domain .......................................................................................................... 66 The Size of the Public Domain ................................................................................................................. 69 The Social and Economic Value of the Public Domain ............................................................................ 70 The Public Domain Effect in Action ......................................................................................................... 75 Public Domain and Opportunities of being Digital ...................................................................................... 77 Challenges and bottlenecks ........................................................................................................................ 84 3 Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report Commodification and Enclosure of Culture ............................................................................................ 85 Copyright Extension and Orphan Works ................................................................................................. 90 Copyright Expansion ................................................................................................................................ 96 Moral Rights and the Public Domain Payant ........................................................................................... 99 Technological Enclosure of Culture ....................................................................................................... 100 Contractual Enclosure of Culture .......................................................................................................... 104 Copyright Censorship and Cultural Diversity ......................................................................................... 107 Legislative Process, Legal Uncertainty and Harmonization ................................................................... 113 Public Domain as the Very Goal of Copyright ........................................................................................... 117 ANNEX III ......................................................................................................................................................... 123 COMMUNIA POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................... 123 Recommendation # 1: The term of copyright protection should be reduced. The excessive length of copyright protection combined with an absence of formalities is highly detrimental to the accessibility of our shared knowledge and culture. .................................................................................................. 127 Recommendation # 2: The proposed term extension of copyright protection for performers and sound recordings will harm the public domain and must not be implemented. ............................................. 128 Recommendation # 3: Harmonize Exceptions and Limitations of the Copyright Directive among the Member States and open up the exhaustive list so that the user prerogatives can be adapted to the ongoing technological transformations. ............................................................................................... 134 Recommendation # 4: As a pre‐requisite for unlocking the cultural, educational and economic potential of the public domain, identification of works being in the public domain should be made easier and less resource consuming by simplifying and harmonizing rules of copyright duration and territoriality. .......................................................................................................................................... 134 Recommendation # 5: Digital reproductions of works that are in the Public Domain must also belong to the Public Domain. Use of works in the public domain should not be limited by any means, either legal or technical. .................................................................................................................................. 135 Recommendation # 6: Any false or misleading attempt to misappropriate Public Domain material must be declared unlawful. False or misleading attempts to claim exclusivity over Public Domain material must be sanctioned. .............................................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation # 7: The Public Domain needs to be protected from the adverse effects of Technical Protection Measures. Circumvention of TPMs must be allowed when exercising user rights created by Exceptions and Limitations or when using Public Domain works. The deployment of TPMs to hinder or impede privileged uses of a protected work or access to public domain material must be sanctioned. .............................................................................................................................................................. 136 Recommendation # 8: In order to prevent unnecessary and unwanted protection of works of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ebook Download Public Domain, the 8Th Edition Ebook, Epub
    PUBLIC DOMAIN, THE 8TH EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Stephen Fishman | 9781413324020 | | | | | Public Domain, The 8th edition PDF Book Thank you! Submit a Tip All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published. Through this link , you will find filtered all the songs in the public domain. Plagiarism is defined as intentionally or unintentionally using the ideas, language, or work of another without acknowledgement that such material is not one's own. What does this mean? The 'Other'. Example of "Chasing Citations" when you read something and want to find the original. Pdinfo is a project that provides information, scores and music tracks in the public domain. Pay by Credit Card. Lofting, Hugh. The Adventures of Chatterer the Red Squirrel. Harold Greenlee "His 'eighth major edition' contains a critical apparatus which has never been equaled in comprehensiveness of citation of Greek mss. After some struggles, he managed to build a great source of information for people who need amazing background music for their projects and videos. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. They are public domain works, in the USA and in many other countries. The Princess and the Goblin. Folkscanomy : A collection of books and text derived from the efforts of volunteers to make information as widely available as possible. Navy - contains good information on knots. The part that appears in green is the part corresponding to public domain music. Public Domain Resources from. The copyright on the musical composition is given on all the elements that make up the composition, such as the music and the lyrics.
    [Show full text]
  • IPRED Versus the Sharing of Culture: Moving Away from Enforcement
    March 2011 IPRED Versus The Sharing of Culture: Moving Away From Enforcement Response to the European Commission's consultation on the “Intellectual Property Rights” Enforcement Directive (IPRED). La Quadrature du Net | 1 Executive summary: EU's Internet policy at crossroads More than 10 years after adopting a framework for the development of information society services and the promotion of freedom of expression online, the European Union faces a crucial choice: It can either pursue the promotion of democratic goals and innovation in the digital environment, or remain blind to social and technical realities by enforcing a copyright regime that is at its very core unadapted to the Internet. Sadly, the European Commission's documents regarding the revision of the “Intellectual Property Rights” Enforcement Directive (IPRED) suggests that forces of the status quo could prevail. In the age of the Internet, where any citizen can have access to a global communications infrastructure to access and disseminate culture and knowledge, our legal system must give up on the idea that each instance of transmission of artistic works must be submitted to prior authorization, especially in cases of non-profit transmission. The debate needs to move away from enforcement and focus on financing schemes and business-models that can accommodate widespread social practices, such as non- commercial file-sharing of cultural works, while providing appropriate resources for creative activities. However, the Internal Market Directorate General of the EU Commission, which is supervising the revision of IPRED, appears too much in line with the copyright industry to break away from outdated policies. Even though it has undertaken laudable efforts to create a more integrated single digital market, its determination to repress non-commercial sharing of cultural goods over the Internet is endangering the technical and legal architecture on which are based the democratic and economic potential of the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • You Are Not Welcome Among Us: Pirates and the State
    International Journal of Communication 9(2015), 890–908 1932–8036/20150005 You Are Not Welcome Among Us: Pirates and the State JESSICA L. BEYER University of Washington, USA FENWICK MCKELVEY1 Concordia University, Canada In a historical review focused on digital piracy, we explore the relationship between hacker politics and the state. We distinguish between two core aspects of piracy—the challenge to property rights and the challenge to state power—and argue that digital piracy should be considered more broadly as a challenge to the authority of the state. We trace generations of peer-to-peer networking, showing that digital piracy is a key component in the development of a political platform that advocates for a set of ideals grounded in collaborative culture, nonhierarchical organization, and a reliance on the network. We assert that this politics expresses itself in a philosophy that was formed together with the development of the state-evading forms of communication that perpetuate unmanageable networks. Keywords: pirates, information politics, intellectual property, state networks Introduction Digital piracy is most frequently framed as a challenge to property rights or as theft. This framing is not incorrect, but it overemphasizes intellectual property regimes and, in doing so, underemphasizes the broader political challenge posed by digital pirates. In fact, digital pirates and broader “hacker culture” are part of a political challenge to the state, as well as a challenge to property rights regimes. This challenge is articulated in terms of contributory culture, in contrast to the commodification and enclosures of capitalist culture; as nonhierarchical, in contrast to the strict hierarchies of the modern state; and as faith in the potential of a seemingly uncontrollable communication technology that makes all of this possible, in contrast to a fear of the potential chaos that unsurveilled spaces can bring.
    [Show full text]
  • De Angelis Omnia Sunt Communia.Pdf
    In Common The architects of our lives are divided. There are those who insist that there is still no alternative to neoliberalism. Despite the many crises it has provoked, they continue to push for compe- tition in every sphere of life, to widen the wealth gap, to ignore climate change and to pursue the steady dispossession of our rights and commonwealth. Then there are those advocating change, those who seek to persuade us that capitalism can be saved from itself. They conceal capitalism behind a human face. They tell us that environmental disaster can be averted through technological solutions. They say that deeply rooted social injustices can be cured with a little more economic growth. That we’ll be safer with more police on our streets. And yet, we know that capitalism is dying, that its lies have been unmasked, that its grip on our world and our lives is maintained only through expropriations, dependency and commodified desires. In Common is a collection of works that see an end to capitalism without apocalypse. It provides us with techniques for building another world, and it narrates practices of alternatives and theories of hope. It is a glimpse into our shared present, for a future in common. In Common is published by Zed Books under the creative commons license. You are free to share this material, transform and build upon it for non-commercial purposes. Series editor: Massimo De Angelis Already published: Stavros Stavrides, Common Space: The City as Commons Omnia Sunt Communia.indd 1 01/03/2017 14:04 Omnia Sunt Communia.indd 2 01/03/2017 14:04 Omnia Sunt Communia On the Commons and the Transformation to Postcapitalism Massimo De Angelis Zed Books LONDON Omnia Sunt Communia.indd 3 01/03/2017 14:04 Omnia Sunt Communia: Principles for the Transition to Postcapitalism was first published in 2017 by Zed Books Ltd, The Foundry, 17 Oval Way, London SE11 5RR, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • November 11-13, 2010 Hilversum and Amsterdam, the Netherlands Inhoudelijk En financiële Verantwoording Economies of the Commons 2, November 2010
    November 11-13, 2010 Hilversum and Amsterdam, the Netherlands www.ecommons.eu Inhoudelijk en financiële verantwoording Economies of the Commons 2, november 2010 Stichting Nederland Kennisland Keizersgracht 174 1016 DW Amsterdam +31 205756720 / http://www.kennisland.nl 2 / 48 1 ECONOMIES OF THE COMMONS 2 ....................................................................................4 1.1 BELANGRIJKSTE OPGELEVERDE RESULTATEN ........................................................................4 1.2 HTTP://WWW.ECOMMONS.EU/ ..............................................................................................5 1.3 PROGRAM ..........................................................................................................................6 2 BLOGPOSTS ..........................................................................................................................8 TOWARDS A RADICAL ARCHIVE: DE BALIEʼS ERIC KLUITENBERG ..................................................9 WHEN LIBRARIES EMBRACE THE DIGITAL FUTURE: INTERVIEW WITH KB'S IRMGARD BOMERS ......10 ARCHIVING IN CONVERGENCE: EUROPEANA'S DYNAMIC PORTAL ...............................................12 THE NETWORKED VAULT: INTERVIEW WITH MAARTEN BRINKERINK OF THE NETHERLANDSʼ INSTITUTE OF SOUND AND VISION ............................................................................................................................13 WHEN THE COPY'S NO EXCEPTION: INTERVIEW WITH KENNISLAND'S PAUL KELLER ...........15 PETER KAUFMAN ON APPRECIATING AUDIOVISUAL VALUE
    [Show full text]
  • Guarding Against Abuse: the Costs of Excessively Long Copyright Terms
    GUARDING AGAINST ABUSE: THE COSTS OF EXCESSIVELY LONG COPYRIGHT TERMS By Derek Khanna* I. INTRODUCTION Copyrights are intended to encourage creative works through the mechanism of a statutorily created1 limited property right, which some prominent think tanks and congressional organizations have referred to as a form of govern- ment regulation.2 Under both economic3 and legal analysis,4 they are recog- * Derek Khanna is a fellow with X-Lab and a technology policy consultant. As a policy consultant he has never worked for any organizations that lobby or with personal stakes in copyright terms, and neither has Derek ever lobbied Congress. He was previously a Yale Law School Information Society Project Fellow. He was featured in Forbes’ 2014 list of top 30 under 30 for law in policy and selected as a top 200 global leader of tomorrow for spear- heading the successful national campaign on cell phone unlocking which led to the enact- ment of copyright reform legislation to legalize phone unlocking. He has spoken at the Con- servative Political Action Conference, South by Southwest, the International Consumer Electronics Show and at several colleges across the country as a paid speaker with the Fed- eralist Society. He also serves as a columnist or contributor to National Review, The Atlan- tic and Forbes. He was previously a professional staff member for the House Republican Study Committee, where he authored the widely read House Republican Study Committee report “Three Myths about Copyright Law.” 1 See Edward C. Walterscheld, Defining the Patent and Copyright Term: Term Limits and the Intellectual Property Clause, 7 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Stalder Digital Solidarity
    Digital Solidarity Digital Digital Solidarity Felix Stalder Felix Stalder’s extended essay, Digital Solidarity, responds to / Digital the wave of new forms of networked organisation emerging from and colliding with the global economic crisis of 2008. Felix Stalder Across the globe, voluntary association, participatory decision- Solidarity making and the sharing of resources, all widely adopted Felix Stalder online, are being translated into new forms of social space. This movement operates in the breach between accelerating technical innovation, on the one hand, and the crises of institutions which organise, or increasingly restrain society on the other. Through an inventory of social forms – commons, assemblies, swarms and weak networks – the essay outlines how far we have already left McLuhan’s ‘Gutenberg Galaxy’ behind. In his cautiously optimistic account, Stalder reminds us that the struggles over where we will arrive are only just beginning. Part of the PML Books series. A collaboration between Mute and the Post-Media Lab Mute Books Price €5 £4.25 $6.75 Cover image: Simon Worthington Digital Solidarity Felix Stalder A collaboration between the Post-Media Lab & Mute Books Anti copyright © 2013 Mute Except for those images which originally appeared elsewhere and are republished here, all content is copyright Mute and the authors. However, Mute encourages the use of its content for purposes that are non-commercial, critical, or disruptive of capitalist property relations. Please make sure you credit the author and Mute as the original publishers. This legend is devised in the absence of a licence which adequately represents this contributor’s and publisher’s respective positions on copyright, and to acknowledge but deny the copyrighting performed by default where copyright is waived.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Culture Forum with Special Guest Lawrence Lessig
    Media Advisory Free Culture Forum With special guest Lawrence Lessig For Immediate Release Date: March 23rd, 2006 Time: 11:30 am - 2:30pm Location: 450 Dodge Hall, Northeastern University For: Students, faculty, staff and the public Cost: Free Join us for a lively discussion on issues related to free culture including artistic freedom, the public domain, copyright, control of the media, open access, open source, free software, academic journals, institutional repositories, and consumer rights. Learn about organizations and projects such as Creative Commons and the Directory of Open Access Journals that support open dialogue and public access to creative works—from scientific, scholarly journals to websites, from photography to music, from literature to courseware. What is the free culture movement? A healthy, vibrant culture must continually be improved and refashioned by those who live in it. This requires a thriving public domain and cultural commons that anyone can build upon or reshape. To achieve this ideal, free culture seeks to promote open intellectual property policy and channel the power of technology toward appreciation, creation, and distribution of participatory culture. According to Lawrence Lessig, free culture is concerned with big media protecting the interests of big media over creators. Free culture supports and protects creators and innovators and seeks the transformation of culture through the free exchange of ideas. The Participants A panel of free culture advocates and experts and you! Professor Lawrence Lessig, Founder, Creative Commons & author of Free Culture Derek Slater, Activist, Electronic Frontier Foundation Nelson Pavlosky, Founder, FreeCulture.Org William Wakeling, Associate Dean, Northeastern University Libraries The Design A panel structure to facilitate high-level interaction between the audience and speakers that will enrich general understanding of free culture by means of free culture -- community collaboration and contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Humanities and Future Archives
    Digital Humanities and Future Archives SAMPO VIIRI REPORTS The Finnish Institute is a London-based private trust. Our mission is to identify emerging issues relevant to contemporary society and to act as catalyst for positive social change through partnerships. We work with artists, researchers, experts and policy makers in the United Kingdom, Finland and the Republic of Ireland to promote strong networks in the fields of culture and society. We encourage new and unexpected collaborations and support artistic interventions, research, the creative industries, foresight and social innovation in new, socially central areas. The Reports of the Finnish Institute in Unit 1, 3 York Way N1C 4AE London London is a series of publications, which United Kingdom publishes research, studies and results of T +44(0)20 3764 5090 collaborative projects carried out by the www.finnish-institute.org.uk institute. The reports provide evidence Digital Humanities and Future Archives and ideas for policy-makers and civic by the Finnish Institute in London is society organisations dealing with licensed under a Creative Commons contemporary social and cultural Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License challenges. August 2014 Table of Contents Preface Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2 Methods 3 1.3 Defining Digital Humanities 4 2 The Researcher's Perspective 8 2.1 Access to Historical Resources and Public Interest 8 2.2 New Tools and Methods 14 2.3 Sharing and Preserving 19 2.4 Narrowing Gaps and Building Bridges 20 2.5 Measuring the Impacts
    [Show full text]
  • The Digital Public Domain
    THE DIGITAL PUBLIC DOMAIN THE DIGITAL PUBLIC DOMAIN21March.indd 1 3/26/12 3:22 PM Melanie Dulong de Rosnay is a researcher at the CNRS Institute for Communication Sciences and associated researcher at CERSA (CNRS University Paris 2) where she is Creative Commons France legal lead. In 2011 she co-founded Communia international association on the digital public domain, which she currently chairs. She works on comparative public policies for open access and on transformation of regulation introduced by distributed architectures. Juan Carlos De Martin is a Faculty Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University and co-director of the NEXA Center for Internet & Society at the Turin Polytechnic (Politecnico di Torino), Italy, which he co-founded in 2006. He is a Professor of Computer Engineering, with research interests focusing on digital media processing and transmission. De Martin also serves as a member of the Scientific Board of the Institute of the Italian Encyclopedia Treccani and of the Biennale Democrazia. THE DIGITAL PUBLIC DOMAIN21March.indd 2 3/26/12 3:22 PM The Digital Public Domain: Foundations for an Open Culture Edited by Melanie Dulong de Rosnay and Juan Carlos De Martin THE DIGITAL PUBLIC DOMAIN21March.indd 3 3/26/12 3:22 PM Open Book Publishers CIC Ltd., 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2012 Melanie Dulong de Rosnay and Juan Carlos De Martin The articles of this book are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Commons for Education Sharing and Using Resources: the Basics
    Creative Commons for Education Sharing and Using Resources: The Basics Clipart Presentation Icon, Open Clipart.org, by ousia, used under Creative Commons Zero 1.0 License (links open in new windows). Creative Commons for Education, Sharing and Using Resources: The Basics by Daniel Stewart (DrStew82) Is licensed under CC BY 4.0. I. Introduction A. Situations B. What is the Creative Commons? C. Understanding the Creative Commons Licenses II. Finding Resources Licensed under Creative Commons. Outline of A. Platforms hosting Creative Commons licensed works. Instruction B. Finding resources. B. Attributing the sources. III. Public Domain resources IV. Become a Contributor Introduction: Situations slide 1 • Have you ever: -had difficulty finding images or other resources like videos or sound files to use in your class without fear of copyright infringement? -wanted to share your own photos, drawings, or other resources for educational use? Clipart Emoticons: Question Face courtesy nicubunu, Open Clipart.org, used under Creative Commons Zero 1.0 License (links open in new windows). Introduction: Creative Commons slide 1 • If either of these situations apply to you, you should learn about the Creative Commons! • What are the Creative Commons? • According to the Creative Commons website: Creative Commons is a nonprofit organization dedicated to building a globally-accessible public commons of knowledge and culture. We make it easier for people to share their creative and academic work, as well as to access and build upon the work of others. By
    [Show full text]
  • EU Copyright Reform Threatens Open Access and Open Science Open Letter to the Members of the Legal Affairs Committee in the European Parliament
    EU copyright reform threatens Open Access and Open Science Open letter to the members of the Legal Affairs Committee in the European Parliament We represent a large group of European academic, library, education, research and digital rights communities and we are writing to express our alarm at the draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, and in particular at the potential impact of Articles 11 and 13. We are concerned that these provisions will create burdensome and harmful restrictions on access to scientific research and data, as well as on the fundamental rights of freedom of information, directly contradicting the EU’s own ambitions in the field of Open Access and Open Science. We therefore urge the Legal Affairs Committee to remove Articles 11 and 13 from the draft Directive. Furthermore, the Committee should ensure that Articles 3 to 9 support new forms of research and education and not work against them. A U-turn on Open Science? 1. We believe that increased digital access, data analytics and open information flows will increase innovation in Europe. The European Commission’s Horizon 2020 programme similarly supports open access to scientific publications and research data as essential drivers of EU global competitiveness. The EU has set an example internationally with its extensive policy work, for example by including Open Access in one of its six European Research Area (ERA) priorities. Moreover, in 2016 at the Competitiveness Council, all of Europe’s ministers of science, innovation, trade and industry committed to Open Access to scientific publications as the default option for publicly funded research results by 2020.
    [Show full text]