DOCSLIB.ORG

Dossier Xnet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Technopolitical innovation for citizen action Real Democracy for the 21st century Transparency and public information: end of corruption and impunity TECHNOPOLITICS THE USE OF NETWORKS TO TRANSFORM REALITY Optimal propagation processes, combining the ability to change and adapt with maintaining a stable identity over time WHAT WE HAVE LEARNT FROM THE NET AND HOW IT CAN BE EXTRAPOLATED TO ALL SPACES OF STRUGGLE The !nternet is not "ust a tool; it is an epoch in history The Internet is both a tool and a battle ro!nd. Our main asset is surprise: the ability to do the unexpected, unexpectedly and in unexpected places %e have to do our crying elsewhere. %ho, what, how, when, where. &nd above all: why !nvention and e$perience at a time. No #roble$ sho!ld e%er ha%e to be sol%ed twi'e" &ttitude is no substitute for competence. Our time is the historical time, not the psychological time. Herd and cataly t ! 'ustice and (uality %hen you have no imagination, you turn to memory )ederated s*ills. Distributed leadership +articipation and responsibility Recognition and collective intelligence. The importance of the fork Altr"# $ # el% &ne t&at &a n't c($e ("t () t&e cl( et! &ll that is outside of the centre will always be -more”: more representative, more numerous, bigger, freer, more /e$ible, more volatile, newer and, above all, more real WHAT WE HAVE LEARNT FROM THE NET AND HOW IT CAN BE EXTRAPOLATED TO ALL SPACES OF STRUGGLE Representative democracy as the dictatorship of the largest minority over the ma"ority of minorities. We are(!n'o!ntable and !n)lo'atable" We &or* with what &e ha%e" The ob"ective of language. 0o power means no rights. Transform our imaginary so we can subvert reality & strategic attitude to our desires and our nightmares 1urvival itself means learning to see what2s ahead L(*ic # a )eelin*! %ithout pleasure and rage, there’s no empowerment. %ithout empowerment there’s no rebellion. %ithout rebellion there’s no r34volution The +C!lt o, -one."/ %e shouldn2t do the things we like to do, but the things that we can win at: and we’ll end up liking it Then there are ethics, implicit in our actions !t is the direction of -doing. We d( n(t teac&+ ,e &are and $a*n#)y &ared -erce-t#(n ! &ll these steps are anti3natural. They all lead us to what we truly desire. 5oralism is a state of racism and cowardliness at the same time !t is the sense of superiority of the person who does not act 5y heroes are my comrades in the 6ght. Be radi'al1 ask ,or the #ossible" Networ*ed action as a str! le philosoph2 PRACTICAL TE3TS FOR ACTION WORKIN4 NOTES FOR A r)E5OLUTION ./011] 3y S#$(na Le4# Our historic and strategic contribution to 175’s construction along with thousands of other people. http:/8conservas.t*8working3notes3for3a3revolution8 NOTES FOR A r)E5OLUTION 6%ersión 8"9: Sta e t&o: %ices %s ne& ta'tical %irt!es ./01/2 3y S#$(na Le4# 175 as a validation of the innovations we propose. http:/8conservas.t*8tactics8 THE PATH TO THE REAL WORL-TM./011] by Ser*#( Sal*ad( 9ow online communication is changing of/ine politics http:/8www.guerrillatranslation org82:1;8:<81=8the3path3to3the3realworld8 3net – Free Internet or barbaris$ >net’s wor* begins in 2::? under the name of E34AE !t is set up by activists and artists coming from movements defending free culture and the !nternet, the movement for the right to housing @AdeAivienda) and other citizen movements. >net organises and begins to wor* in the defence of sharing, of the free /ow of information and of free culture, promoting a critical debate on copyright, copyleft and licenses. Different dispositives are frequently launched as anon2$ous devices for speci6c issues or campaigns. FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE FREE CULTURE FORUM ./0056-re ent day2 http:88fcforum net/en8 &n international space for the development of proposals coming from civil society !t has produced various programmatic documents such as: ➢ Charter ,or Inno%ation, Creativit2 and A''ess to Kno&ledge http:88fcforum net/en8charter ➢ Sustainable $odels ,or 'reati%it2 in the di ital era http:88fcforum net/en8sustainable-models-for3creativity ➢ Cro&dfunding e>#erien'es in the Spanish state and Catalonia http:882:12 fcforum net/e$periencias-crowdfunding3caracteristicas-retos-ob staculos/ FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE NORMALISATION OF THE O3CARS ./0076/0182 The reatest ,ree '!lt!re show o, all ti$es Each edition shows the most innovative wor* done that contributes to the affirmation of a culture and philosophy adapted to sharing and the digital era, as well as the use of the !nternet as a tool for improving "ustice and the (uality of democracy http:/8$net3x.net8en8get3in3touch3for8the3o$cars8 5ideo +The Best o, the O>'ars.: https:88www youtube com8watchCv=ux4tA*Rn!7c FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE MOLINA PÍRATE ./0052 http:88$net3$ net/molina-pirate Campaign against an agreement promoted by the 1panish 5inister of Culture 3 Eesar &ntonio 5olina 3 that would give private !nternet providers control of citizen’s use of their &D1F connections, favouring multinational communication business and collection societies. The #ublic response to the a ree$ent #ro$oted Minister Molina@s re$o%al ,ro$ o,A'e" 5ideo; https:88vimeo com8;<2317< FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE RE- SOS)TENIBLE ./0106/0112 http:88red3sostenible.net/ & citizen platform, made up by collectives, associations and individuals coordinating to struggle against the 1inde Faw and in defence of the Net&or* Ne!tralit2 and transparen'2 Through this networ*, actions against ACTA are also coordinated SIN-E PÍRATE ./0102 http:88$net3$ net/sinde-pirate &gainst the following 5inister of Culture 3 &ngeles Gonzalez3 1inde 3 and the so3called H1inde Faw", that typified the criminalization of downloads and the obtaining of pro6ts and privileges for telecommunications companies. Po#ular #ressure thro! h the Internet halted its a##ro%al durin PSOE@s o%ern$ent" FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE 0LACKOUT EUROPE in the S#anish state ./0052 http:88$net3$ net/blac*out3europe Eampaign for the 4uropean elections of June 6th 2::<: "we will not vote for parties that want to sell our right of access to the !nternet to private interests.H STOP ACTA in the S#anish state ./0102 http:88$net3$ net/stop-acta &CT& was another offense against cultureJs circulation on the !nternet 0egotiated by a small "club" of countries with the same opinions instead of being democratically debated &CT& bypassed parliaments and international organisations to dictate a repressive logic for the entertainment industries. ACTA &as reBe'ted in the Euro#ean Parlia$ent on Cul2 Dth 89E8" FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE -)E5OLUTION SUMMIT .March 21 t6/8rd 20102 http:88d3evolution fcforum net/ 1imultaneous action to the summit of the 27 4K 5inisters of Culture and their encounter with the 4uropean )orum for Cultural !ndustries in Larcelona. !t was conceived as a real- time chronic of what was going on and a lobbying action It a'hie%ed to s!bstantiall2 $odi,2 the 'ontent o, the reen boo* #ro#osed b2 the Euro#ean Co$$ission. Aideo: https:88www youtube.com8watchCvD<Mz<0+u5nfo INTERNET WONFT 0E ANOTHER TV ./0102 http:88internetnoseraotratv net/ PU0LICATIONS The result of the wor* developed by >net members in different areas of action, has been part of various publications. http:88$net3$ net/en8get3in3touch3for8publications/ http:88$net3$ net/en8get3in3touch3for8research3conferences-and3courses/ FREE CULTURE & INTERNET DEFENSE S!stainabilit2 ,or the -i ital a e TRAINING IN ONLINE ACTION Radical Co$$!nit2 Mana er !ntensive training courses on digital tools and strategies, social networ*s and campaign design for organised citizens. http:/8xnet3$.net8en8get3in3touch3for/training3in3online-action8 How to o deep into the Internet as a battleAeld and how to gain the abilities to organise and amplify our actions, taking advantage of the synergies of the networ*ed society NETWORKED -EMOCRACY & THE STRUGGLE AGAINST CORRUPTION NETWORKED DEMOCRACY ./011 9 -re ent day2 NOT VERTICAL NOT HORIZONTAL NETWORKED -ISMANTLE; ➢ +ut an end corruption to implement a networ*ed democracy 0UIL-; ➢ !nformation transparency ➢ Disintermediation of citizen action ➢ Citizen control of institutions THE STRU44LE A4AINST CORRUPTION THE EN- OF IMPUNITY ./01/6-re ent day2 http:88$net3$ net/en86ght3against3corruption3guide BUGHNX – The X$ailbo> CITIGEN LEAKS AGAINST CORRUPTION The 0!I7nX device is a channel created for safely connecting citizens with evidence of corruption to "ournalists and legal e$perts. http:88$net3$ net/en8get3in3touch3for8$mailbo$3lea*s-against3corruption8 Developed from the lessons learnt from %i*ileaks and wor*ing on scaling3up at local and analogical levels, LuzNn> has now dozens of cases on which the team are wor*ing on to give le al and $edia out'o$es !n parallel, >net gives training for citizens active on the matter of 6ghting corruption CASES UNCO5ERE- THROU4H BUGHNX TO THE -ATE ➢ Llesa’s emails reach the public opinion 3 Report O interview: PLuzNn>, citizens against corruption https:88www youtube.com8watchCv=o>QfI1o=%0* (video 4nglish captionsB ➢ 9ow Eaja 5adrid2s Llack Eards2 scandal was uncovered http:88www publico es8internacional/herederos3assange3dan3caza3rato html ➢ & "udge investigates another corruption plot concerning the Eatalan &A4 http:88www elperiodico com8es8noticias8sociedad8juez3indaga3otra3trama3corrupta3del3av e3catalan3portada3periodico3catalunya3;771=;; ➢ 5inister Fuis de Guindos2 role in PFu$Feaks http:88$net3$ net8de3guindos3en3lu$leaks ➢ 1on 4spases 9ospital Ease and the involvement of
Recommended publications
  • IPRED Versus the Sharing of Culture: Moving Away from Enforcement

    IPRED Versus the Sharing of Culture: Moving Away from Enforcement

    March 2011 IPRED Versus The Sharing of Culture: Moving Away From Enforcement Response to the European Commission's consultation on the “Intellectual Property Rights” Enforcement Directive (IPRED). La Quadrature du Net | 1 Executive summary: EU's Internet policy at crossroads More than 10 years after adopting a framework for the development of information society services and the promotion of freedom of expression online, the European Union faces a crucial choice: It can either pursue the promotion of democratic goals and innovation in the digital environment, or remain blind to social and technical realities by enforcing a copyright regime that is at its very core unadapted to the Internet. Sadly, the European Commission's documents regarding the revision of the “Intellectual Property Rights” Enforcement Directive (IPRED) suggests that forces of the status quo could prevail. In the age of the Internet, where any citizen can have access to a global communications infrastructure to access and disseminate culture and knowledge, our legal system must give up on the idea that each instance of transmission of artistic works must be submitted to prior authorization, especially in cases of non-profit transmission. The debate needs to move away from enforcement and focus on financing schemes and business-models that can accommodate widespread social practices, such as non- commercial file-sharing of cultural works, while providing appropriate resources for creative activities. However, the Internal Market Directorate General of the EU Commission, which is supervising the revision of IPRED, appears too much in line with the copyright industry to break away from outdated policies. Even though it has undertaken laudable efforts to create a more integrated single digital market, its determination to repress non-commercial sharing of cultural goods over the Internet is endangering the technical and legal architecture on which are based the democratic and economic potential of the Internet.
  • For the Encouragement of Learning

    For the Encouragement of Learning

    For the Encouragement of Learning Copyright 1710-2010 Anniversary Forum London, 9 April 2010 “For the Encouragement of Learning” The world’s first copyright law was passed by the English Parliament on 10 April 1710 as ‘An Act for the Encouragement of Learning’. The Queen Anne Statute, as it is known, marked the beginning of modern copyright law. Professor Gillian Davies, author of ‘Copyright and the Public Interest’, describes it as ‘the foundation upon which the modern concept of copyright in the Western world was built’, quoting Halsbury’s ‘Laws of England’, edited by Lord Hailsham, as saying, ‘In changing the conceptual nature of copyright, it became the most important single event in copyright history’ and Barbara Ringer, US Registrar of Copyrights, as saying, ‘It is the mother of us all, and a very possessive mother at that.’ The 300th anniversary provides a unique opportunity to review copyright’s purposes and principles. If today we were starting from scratch, but with the same aim of encouraging learning‚ what kind of copyright would we want? To answer this question, the British Council is organising a series of meetings in London, Shanghai and elsewhere. Our starting point is the question, What is the purpose of copyright? And, once that is agreed, even tentatively, how could we achieve it? Is the list of ‘qualifying works’ the right one? Should copyright arise automatically or should rights be registered? Is ‘copyright’ the appropriate name? How do we balance access and ownership? What are the optimal lengths of copyright terms? What is the role of moral rights, and of personal data and privacy? What do we mean by ‘fair’ in the phrases ‘fair dealing’ and ‘fair use’ and how do we uphold this fairness in practice? Is fairness in a physical world different from fairness in the digital space? How do we define unlawful copying and how do we promote a fair regime of sanctions and penalties? The possibilities of creating and copying have expanded dramatically in recent years.
  • November 11-13, 2010 Hilversum and Amsterdam, the Netherlands Inhoudelijk En financiële Verantwoording Economies of the Commons 2, November 2010

    November 11-13, 2010 Hilversum and Amsterdam, the Netherlands Inhoudelijk En financiële Verantwoording Economies of the Commons 2, November 2010

    November 11-13, 2010 Hilversum and Amsterdam, the Netherlands www.ecommons.eu Inhoudelijk en financiële verantwoording Economies of the Commons 2, november 2010 Stichting Nederland Kennisland Keizersgracht 174 1016 DW Amsterdam +31 205756720 / http://www.kennisland.nl 2 / 48 1 ECONOMIES OF THE COMMONS 2 ....................................................................................4 1.1 BELANGRIJKSTE OPGELEVERDE RESULTATEN ........................................................................4 1.2 HTTP://WWW.ECOMMONS.EU/ ..............................................................................................5 1.3 PROGRAM ..........................................................................................................................6 2 BLOGPOSTS ..........................................................................................................................8 TOWARDS A RADICAL ARCHIVE: DE BALIEʼS ERIC KLUITENBERG ..................................................9 WHEN LIBRARIES EMBRACE THE DIGITAL FUTURE: INTERVIEW WITH KB'S IRMGARD BOMERS ......10 ARCHIVING IN CONVERGENCE: EUROPEANA'S DYNAMIC PORTAL ...............................................12 THE NETWORKED VAULT: INTERVIEW WITH MAARTEN BRINKERINK OF THE NETHERLANDSʼ INSTITUTE OF SOUND AND VISION ............................................................................................................................13 WHEN THE COPY'S NO EXCEPTION: INTERVIEW WITH KENNISLAND'S PAUL KELLER ...........15 PETER KAUFMAN ON APPRECIATING AUDIOVISUAL VALUE
  • Battling Bankers: Insights on Financial Power from the Grassroots

    Battling Bankers: Insights on Financial Power from the Grassroots

    STATE OF POWER 2019 Battling Bankers Insights on financial power from the grassroots Interview with Simona Levi, Alvin Mosioma and Joel Benjamin Worldwide, countless activists are engaged in challenging unjust financial power on a daily basis. Few are financial experts or economists but citizens who through their struggles have gained an understanding of financial power that few academics can rival. TNI had the privilege of talking to three warriors against the international banking cartel – a theatre director in Spain, a tax justice leader in Kenya and a local government campaigner in the UK – to hear about their struggles and the insights they have picked up that have relevance to all of us. Simona Levi, a theatre director and performance artist, is based in Barcelona. With her small group Xnet, she succeeded in getting former IMF chief and Bankia executive Rato and 17 others sentenced to prison in 2018 for their financial crimes and role in Spain’s economic crisis. Alvin Mosioma is based in Nairobi and with others stopped a tax avoidance treaty between Kenya and Mauritius. He helped organise the first World Social Forum in Kenya and is the founding Executive Director of Tax Justice Network-Africa. Joel Benjamin is based in London. His work with Debt Resistance UK has exposed a slew of toxic loans sold under false pretences to local authorities and has prompted major lawsuits, parliamentary enquiries and extensive media coverage. State of Power 2019: Finance 16 What finance-related campaigns are you involved in right now? Alvin: Our work revolves around how to ensure finance works for people.
  • Felix Stalder Digital Solidarity

    Felix Stalder Digital Solidarity

    Digital Solidarity Digital Digital Solidarity Felix Stalder Felix Stalder’s extended essay, Digital Solidarity, responds to / Digital the wave of new forms of networked organisation emerging from and colliding with the global economic crisis of 2008. Felix Stalder Across the globe, voluntary association, participatory decision- Solidarity making and the sharing of resources, all widely adopted Felix Stalder online, are being translated into new forms of social space. This movement operates in the breach between accelerating technical innovation, on the one hand, and the crises of institutions which organise, or increasingly restrain society on the other. Through an inventory of social forms – commons, assemblies, swarms and weak networks – the essay outlines how far we have already left McLuhan’s ‘Gutenberg Galaxy’ behind. In his cautiously optimistic account, Stalder reminds us that the struggles over where we will arrive are only just beginning. Part of the PML Books series. A collaboration between Mute and the Post-Media Lab Mute Books Price €5 £4.25 $6.75 Cover image: Simon Worthington Digital Solidarity Felix Stalder A collaboration between the Post-Media Lab & Mute Books Anti copyright © 2013 Mute Except for those images which originally appeared elsewhere and are republished here, all content is copyright Mute and the authors. However, Mute encourages the use of its content for purposes that are non-commercial, critical, or disruptive of capitalist property relations. Please make sure you credit the author and Mute as the original publishers. This legend is devised in the absence of a licence which adequately represents this contributor’s and publisher’s respective positions on copyright, and to acknowledge but deny the copyrighting performed by default where copyright is waived.
  • Are Eu Governments Taking Whistleblower Protection Seriously?

    Are Eu Governments Taking Whistleblower Protection Seriously?

    ARE EU GOVERNMENTS TAKING WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION SERIOUSLY? Progress report on transposition of the EU Directive Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. www.transparency.org The Whistleblowing International Network is an international membership organisation and leading centre of global civil society expertise and innovation in whistleblowing law and practice. whistleblowingnetwork.org Are EU Governments Taking Whistleblower Protection Seriously? Progress Report on Transposition of the EU Directive Supported by a grant from the Open Society Policy Center in cooperation with the Open Society Initiative of Europe (OSIFE), part of the Open Society Foundations. Author: Marie Terracol Contributors: Anna Myers, Ida Nowers and all the country experts (listed on page 30) Reviewers: Matthew Jenkins, Adam Földes, Julius Hinks, John Devitt, Jan Dupák, Carina Paju, Nick Aiossa Cover: Miikka Luotio / Unsplash.com Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of February 2021. Nevertheless, Transparency International and the Whistleblowing International Network cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-168-6 2021 Transparency International and Whistleblowing International Network. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests.
  • Free Culture Forum with Special Guest Lawrence Lessig

    Free Culture Forum with Special Guest Lawrence Lessig

    Media Advisory Free Culture Forum With special guest Lawrence Lessig For Immediate Release Date: March 23rd, 2006 Time: 11:30 am - 2:30pm Location: 450 Dodge Hall, Northeastern University For: Students, faculty, staff and the public Cost: Free Join us for a lively discussion on issues related to free culture including artistic freedom, the public domain, copyright, control of the media, open access, open source, free software, academic journals, institutional repositories, and consumer rights. Learn about organizations and projects such as Creative Commons and the Directory of Open Access Journals that support open dialogue and public access to creative works—from scientific, scholarly journals to websites, from photography to music, from literature to courseware. What is the free culture movement? A healthy, vibrant culture must continually be improved and refashioned by those who live in it. This requires a thriving public domain and cultural commons that anyone can build upon or reshape. To achieve this ideal, free culture seeks to promote open intellectual property policy and channel the power of technology toward appreciation, creation, and distribution of participatory culture. According to Lawrence Lessig, free culture is concerned with big media protecting the interests of big media over creators. Free culture supports and protects creators and innovators and seeks the transformation of culture through the free exchange of ideas. The Participants A panel of free culture advocates and experts and you! Professor Lawrence Lessig, Founder, Creative Commons & author of Free Culture Derek Slater, Activist, Electronic Frontier Foundation Nelson Pavlosky, Founder, FreeCulture.Org William Wakeling, Associate Dean, Northeastern University Libraries The Design A panel structure to facilitate high-level interaction between the audience and speakers that will enrich general understanding of free culture by means of free culture -- community collaboration and contribution.
  • Deliverable 5.3 National Dissemination Workshops

    Deliverable 5.3 National Dissemination Workshops

    This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme under grant agreement No 645852 EU Grant Agreement number: 645852 Project acronym: DIGIWHIST Project title: The Digital Whistleblower: Fiscal Transparency, Risk Assessment and the Impact of Good Governance Policies Assessed Work Package: 5 - Dissemination Title of deliverable: 5.3 National dissemination workshops Due date of deliverable: 28.02.2018 Actual submission date: XX Authors: Francesco Calderoni, Martina Rotondi, Riccardo Milani, Marina Mancuso and Ernesto U.Savona Organization name of lead beneficiary for this deliverable: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Transcrime Dissemination Level PU Public x PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Co Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission All rights reserved. This document has been published thanks to the support of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation Programme under grant agreement No 645852. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) only and do not reflect any collective opinion of the DIGIWHIST consortium, nor do they reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the European Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information 1 DIGIWHIST National
  • COMMUNIA Final Report

    COMMUNIA Final Report

    Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report ECP‐2006‐PSI‐610001 COMMUNIA http://COMMUNIA‐project.eu/ Final Report Deliverable number/name Deliverable D1.11: Final Report Dissemination level Public Delivery date March 31, 2011 Status FINAL VERSION TO REVIEWERS Main Author Giancarlo F. Frosio This document incorporates the results of several months of discussions among COMMUNIA members. The main author and the project coordinator wish to thank everyone who contributed, and particularly Lucie Guibault, Paul Keller, Séverine Dusollier and Patrick Peiffer whose comments and analyzes have greatly enhanced this text. eContentplus This project is funded under the eContentplus prograMMe,1 a Multiannual CoMMunity prograMMe to Make digital content in Europe More accessible, usable and exploitable. 1 O.J. L 79 (March 24, 2005), at 1. 1 Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report 2 Deliverable D.1.11 COMMUNIA Final Report CONTENTS CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 COMMUNIA FINAL REPORT .................................................................................................................................. 7 WHAT IS THE PUBLIC DOMAIN? ........................................................................................................................... 7 THE VALUE OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN FOR EUROPE ................................................................................................. 11 PUBLIC DOMAIN CHALLENGES
  • FAKE NEWS Y Desinformacion ------#Fakeyou

    FAKE NEWS Y Desinformacion ------#Fakeyou

    Informe para la acción estratégica y legislativa --------------------- FAKE NEWS Y DESINFORMACIoN ---------------------#FakeYou MONOPOLIOS DE LA MANIPULACIÓN INFORMATIVA [(TUS) GOBIERNOS | PARTIDOS POLÍTICOS | MASS MEDIA (NO PERIODISTAS) | CORPORACIONES] Y RECORTES DE LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIÓN Por Xnet VERSIÓN BETA SIN MAQUETAR ABIERTA A PEER REVIEW [Para correcciones y sugerencias, por favor, copiad la/s palabra/s o párrafo/s que queréis enmendar y mandad redacción alternativa con, si necesaria, motivación indicado el número de página, al email: [email protected]] Coordinación: Simona Levi Autores: Simona Levi, Robert Guixaró y Max Carbonell, Gemma Palau, Elizabeth Bodi, Gemma García, Pol Alberti participantes del Curso de Posgrado Tecnopolítica y Derechos en la Era Digital de la BSM-Universitat Pompeu Fabra dirigido por Simona Levi y Cristina Ribas Con aportaciones de Guillem Martínez, Mariluz Congosto, Alberto Escorcia, Lorin Decarli y Tatiana Bazzichelli (Disruption Network Lab Berlín) Agradecimientos a Alba Gutiérrez, Rubén Sáez, Sergio Salgado, L’entrellat Y en colaboración con Andrew Wainwright Reform Trust Las correcciones de este trabajo se han hecho con fondos de una subvención recibida por Xnet por parte del Ayuntamiento de Barcelona Licencia CC 4.0 by sa Barcelona - 14 de marzo de 2019 VERSION BETA PARA PEER REVIEW By the King. A proclamation to restrain the spreading of false news, and licentious talking of matters of state and government. England and Wales. Sovereign (1660-1685, King Charles II). Re-printed 1672. “C R HONI SOIT QVI MAL Y PENSE By the King. A PROCLAMATION To Restrain the Spreading of False News, and Licentious Talking of Matters of State and Government. CHARLES R.
  • The Practice of Art and AI

    The Practice of Art and AI

    Gerfried Stocker, Markus Jandl, Andreas J. Hirsch The Practice of Art and AI ARS ELECTRONICA Art, Technology & Society Contents Gerfried Stocker, Markus Jandl, Andreas J. Hirsch 8 Promises and Challenges in the Practice of Art and AI Andreas J. Hirsch 10 Five Preliminary Notes on the Practice of AI and Art 12 1. AI–Where a Smoke Screen Veils an Opaque Field 19 2. A Wide and Deep Problem Horizon– Massive Powers behind AI in Stealthy Advance 25 3. A Practice Challenging and Promising– Art and Science Encounters Put to the Test by AI 29 4. An Emerging New Relationship–AI and the Artist 34 5. A Distant Mirror Coming Closer– AI and the Human Condition Veronika Liebl 40 Starting the European ARTificial Intelligence Lab 44 Scientific Partners 46 Experiential AI@Edinburgh Futures Institute 48 Leiden Observatory 50 Museo de la Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero Centro de Arte y Ciencia 52 SETI Institute 54 Ars Electronica Futurelab 56 Scientific Institutions 59 Cultural Partners 61 Ars Electronica 66 Activities 69 Projects 91 Artists 101 CPN–Center for the Promotion of Science 106 Activities 108 Projects 119 Artists 125 The Culture Yard 130 Activities Contents Contents 132 Projects 139 Artists 143 Zaragoza City of Knowledge Foundation 148 Activities 149 Projects 155 Artists 159 GLUON 164 Activities 165 Projects 168 Artists 171 Hexagone Scène Nationale Arts Science 175 Activities 177 Projects 182 Artists 185 Kersnikova Institute / Kapelica Gallery 190 Activities 192 Projects 200 Artists 203 LABoral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial 208 Activities
  • Remember Remember, the 4Th of July

    Remember Remember, the 4Th of July

    Remember remember, the 4th of July Internet Freedom in the European Union and the vote on ACTA Master thesis for the Faculty of Humanities, Utrecht University Master program New Media & Digital Culture 2011-2012 Author Lindsy Szilvasi [email protected] August 31, 2012 2 To my grandfather. My hero, my inspiration. Mies ✝2012 3 4 Foreword “Remember, remember, the Fi-h of November, the Gunpowder Treason and Plot. I know of no reason why the Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot... But what of the man? I know his name was Guy Fawkes and I know, in 1605, he aHempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament. But who was he really? What was he like? We are told to remember the idea, not the man, because a man can fail. He can be caught, he can be killed and forgoHen, but 400 years later, an idea can sMll change the world.” “...fairness, jusMce, and freedom are more than words, they are perspecves.” (From the movie V for Vende0a 2005) I would like to express my gratude to a few persons who have given me the support and inspiraon for wri4ng this thesis and have made a valuable contribu4on. First of all, dr. Imar de Vries and Mirko-Tobias Schäfer for the instruc4ons, feedback and evaluaon of this thesis. Secondly, all the Bits of Freedom members for giving me the opportunity of being part of a team that fights for our online liber4es and rights, and for giving me the unique chance of mee4ng other inspiring Internet freedom fighters, including a look inside the European Parliament.